Trump 2.0 or Project 2025?
08:48 Share

Back in April 2023, without a whole lot of fanfare, a conservative political operative named Paul Danz laid out what was basically a political battle plan. What we're doing is systematically preparing to march into office and bring a new army of aligned, trained,

and essentially weaponized conservatives ready to do battle against the deep state. It was called Project 2025, a 900-plus page blueprint for a future conservative president — because it's worth flagging that at this point, President Trump had not yet locked down the Republican nomination — to hit the ground running on day one. It outlined a suite of very conservative policies —

That would, for example, outlaw the mailing of abortion pills and abolish the Department of Education. It even suggests a return to the gold standard.

Democrats saw this as a vulnerability for Trump in the 2024 campaign. And so we saw social media videos like this one from then president and then candidate Joe Biden. Project 2025 will destroy America. Look it up. We saw Saturday Night Live's Kenan Thompson on the stage at the Democratic National Convention holding up a giant bound copy of the plan. You ever seen a document that could kill a small animal and democracy at the same time? Here it is.

After the plan became a Democratic talking point, Trump repeatedly disavowed Project 2025. Here he is on Fox News. I have no idea what it is. It's a group of extremely conservative people got together and wrote up a wish list of things

Many of which I disagree with entirely. They're too severe. But now that Trump is in office, releasing his own detailed plans, a lot of them are strikingly similar to the ones laid out in Project 2025. And one of its chief architects was just confirmed to head the critical Office of Management and Budget. Here's Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. And make no mistake about it, Russell Vogt is Project 2025 incarnate.

Consider this. Trump rejected Project 2025 during the campaign. Now that he's president, is he operating from its playbook? From NPR, I'm Scott Detrow.

This message comes from Schwab. At Schwab, how you invest is your choice, not theirs. That's why when it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices. You can invest and trade on your own. Plus, get advice and more comprehensive wealth solutions to help meet your unique needs. With award-winning service, low costs, and transparent advice, you can manage your wealth your way at Schwab. Visit schwab.com to learn more.

This message comes from A24 with The Brutalist, nominated for 10 Academy Awards, including Best Picture. Starring Adrian Brody, Guy Pearce, and Felicity Jones. Directed by Brady Corbett. The Brutalist, now playing in IMAX and in theaters everywhere.

This message comes from Intuit TurboTax. Now, taxes is matching with an expert backed by tech to get you the most money back at TurboTax.com. Experts only available with TurboTax Live. See guarantee details at TurboTax.com slash guarantees. ♪♪

It's Consider This from NPR. Politico has been looking into where Project 2025's ideas are showing up in Trump's early executive orders. And this past week, they published a breakdown of 37 different examples. Megan Messerly covers the White House for Politico and joins me now. Welcome. Thank you.

So let's start with that list. What are some of the areas where we have seen the clearest echoes of Project 2025 in the action of the White House? The biggest category that we've seen overlap between Project 2025 and the president's orders is in the area of social issues. And that's obviously a broad bucket of things like social

school choice and banning diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, prohibiting transgender troops from serving in the military. But we've really seen this cover a broad swath of policy areas from social issues to immigration and government staffing, energy, foreign affairs, the economy. Like it really touches everything.

every area of President Trump's executive order so far. It wasn't just a policy plan, though, as well. This was a database of potential administration staffers. This was a conservative bench of people who are motivated to quickly dismantle big chunks of the government that they don't like. Have you seen that play out in the first few weeks of this administration?

Absolutely. I mean, if you look at the list in Project 2025, there's this lengthy list of folks who contributed to the project. And there is significant overlap between this list and the folks who are now joining President Trump's administration. He distanced himself from this effort on the campaign trail. But at the same time, you know, I think folks always sort of knew that a lot of these folks were going to end up in the administration.

Many of them are former administration officials themselves, and we're seeing them go back in for Trump 2.0. Some of them are even joining his cabinet. Russ Vogt, the new director of the Office of Management and Budget, his pick for CIA, John Ratcliffe, his borders are, Tom Homan. And it is fair to say that Vogt did write a big chunk of this plan. Absolutely. He authored a whole chapter, in fact, on the executive office of

The president, you know, vote is known for sort of being really in the weeds, these nitty gritty details of really how to use executive branch authority to the fullest extent and even press that in terms of some separation of powers issues. He has this whole belief about empowerment, this idea that the president doesn't actually have to spend the dollars that Congress allows the federal government to spend.

I want to stick on that for a moment because this seems like this is going to be a big fight of the Trump administration. We saw this proposed freeze on federal funding. It got a lot of attention. It was challenged in court immediately. The administration eventually walked it back, at least for now, but they made it clear we want to do this again. You're saying that vote has written about this, has talked about this, this idea that Congress appropriates the money.

The executive branch, in his view and clearly in the view of many people in the Trump administration, doesn't necessarily have to spend it, can choose not to spend it. This is something that was in the plan. So if you look at the plan, he sort of lays out this theory of the case. I will say he doesn't go unnoticed.

quite as far in Project 2025 as he has in other writings and sort of fully laying out his legal theory here on impoundment. But he makes very clear in Project 2025 that he believes that Congress has delegated far too much authority to what he refers to as the fourth branch of government, sort of

the administrative state, the career bureaucrats. And so that's reflected in the federal funding freeze that we saw. A lot of folks I talked to, though, say the rollout of that freeze obviously threw Washington into chaos before the White House sort of walked that

back. But folks now close to vote, you know, are telling me that they expect him to sort of find a clear cut case where this can actually go to court and potentially make its way up to the Supreme Court to determine whether or not they agree with the argument that vote has made that the president does have this authority to say no to congressional spending edicts.

What is the White House saying right now? Because as we laid out, there was such a clear disavowal of this during the campaign. And as you have reported, yet so much of it is actually part of the action plan. Exactly. You know, when we've asked them specifically about, you know, the overlap between many of these executive orders and Project 2025, you know, we haven't gotten a lot of, you know, direct response. But in general, the argument that we're hearing now from the White House is this

idea that, you know, if you look at Project 2025, a lot of these are sort of just longstanding conservative ideas or things that President Trump himself did do during his first term. And so I think the argument there is, OK, yes, these ideas may be in Project 2025, but these are also just reflective of President Trump's priorities.

Have you it's still early. Democrats are clearly struggling with how to respond politically to all of this. Democrats seem to think this was a powerful argument during the campaign. Perhaps it wasn't because they lost. Have you seen have you come across this? Have you looked at this at all? Are Democrats focusing in on this again in this moment?

You know, they are. I think it's to be determined what the impact of that is. I mean, I think a lot of the American public, this label of Project 2025 did stick in their minds. When I was on the campaign trail, people were, you know, bringing it up to me of their own volition. So clearly that messaging really broke through. And that's why Democrats were leading so heavily on it. You know, we've seen Senator Kaine, other members of Congress,

Congress, especially Democrats leading up to votes confirmation, you know, saying like this guy is a Project 2025 author. This is what we warned you about. You know, on the other hand, President Trump is moving forward. He is now elected. You know, so if there are any concerns about Project 2025 from Democrats, from members of the American public, those aren't the folks that hold the levers of power right now. And so it's sort of full steam ahead from the Trump administration.

It's Megan Messerly, White House reporter for Politico. Thank you so much. Thanks for having me. This episode was produced by Connor Donovan. It was edited by Courtney Dorning. Our executive producer is Sammy Yannigan. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Scott Detrow.

Support for NPR and the following message come from State Farm. As a State Farm agent and agency owner, Lakeisha Gaines understands the support small businesses need. Knowing that no business is the same, knowing that we're all impacted by things that are beyond our control like a

And hearing and listening and understanding what's important to a business owner, understanding how much is truly affordable and what makes sense at that moment. Because a three-year psychiatrist is going to be very different than a 20-year doctor. And a two-year sign owner is going to be very different than a one-month restaurant owner who's just trying to figure out what's going to be on the menu next month.

Those are the things that I think are extremely important that come to my experience as a small business owner. It's me figuring out how to help the people that I live with, how to help the people that I work with, how to help the people that I volunteer with. Talk to your local agent about small business insurance from State Farm. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.

This message comes from Warby Parker. What makes a great pair of glasses? At Warby Parker, it's all the invisible extras without the extra cost, like free adjustments for life. Find your pair at warbyparker.com or visit one of their hundreds of stores around the country.

This message comes from Mint Mobile. Mint Mobile took what's wrong with wireless and made it right. They offer premium wireless plans for less, and all plans include high-speed data, unlimited talk and text, and nationwide coverage. See for yourself at mintmobile.com slash switch.