We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
The Supreme Court’s Season Finale, Explained
2025/6/30
The Journal.
J
Jess Bravin
J
Jessica Mendoza
Jessica Mendoza: 最高法院对普遍禁令做出了裁决，这对特朗普总统来说是一个重大胜利。最高法院的裁决并非关于出生公民权，而是关于下级法院是否有权暂停全国性政策变更。
Jess Bravin: 这一届最高法院的意义，将取决于下一届最高法院的走向。本届最高法院最重要和最受关注的裁决，并非来自常规案件，而是来自紧急案件。最高法院对总统权力和行政部门非常尊重，并且试图保持中立，避免做出针对特朗普的特定裁决。最高法院传递的信息是，他们非常尊重行政权力。最高法院接受了司法部的程序框架，这对特朗普政府来说是一个重大胜利，使其更容易实施政策，但并不意味着他可以为所欲为。这项裁决限制了下级法院制衡行政部门权力的能力，但并不限制最高法院的权力。卡瓦诺大法官指出，无论下级法院的禁令如何，人们都会迅速向最高法院寻求裁决，如果问题足够重大，最高法院很可能会介入。
Deep Dive
The Supreme Court concluded its term with a significant ruling on universal injunctions, limiting the power of a single judge to block executive orders nationwide. This decision, stemming from a case concerning birthright citizenship, was a major win for President Trump. The court's handling of emergency cases is defining this moment in its history.
- Supreme Court ruled on universal injunctions, limiting a single judge's power to block executive orders nationwide
- Decision resulted from a case related to an executive order on birthright citizenship
- Ruling was 6-3 along partisan lines, a major win for President Trump
- Most significant decisions came from the emergency docket, not the regular docket
Shownotes Transcript