We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Season 3: (BONUS) Evidentiary Hearing

Season 3: (BONUS) Evidentiary Hearing

2022/3/24
logo of podcast CounterClock

CounterClock
AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
A
Alan Baum
A
Andre Gamage
C
Craig Whitfield
D
Delia D'Ambra
F
Fran Watson
J
Jim Colonies
K
Kathy Hawley
S
Sheila Saunders
T
Tony Beeler
Topics
Delia D'Ambra：本集回顾了自2021年9月8日Jeff Pelley被批准进行证据听证会以来发生的一切。听证会的重点是四个改判请求：律师无效、检察官渎职、快速审判权被侵犯以及新发现的证据。本集还包括对证人证词、物证以及警方调查的分析，并探讨了Bob Pelley在佛罗里达州的过去与其谋杀案的潜在联系。 Alan Baum：承认在处理Jeff Pelley案中关于牛仔裤是否被洗过的证据时，他的工作存在不足，没有充分调查Bob Pelley在佛罗里达州的过去。 Andre Gamage：对Jeff Pelley前律师的投入程度表示担忧，认为他更关注案件的宣传而非案件本身，并提到辩护团队没有充分调查Bob Pelley在佛罗里达州的背景。 Fran Watson：认为检察官在2006年的审判中歪曲了关于牛仔裤的证据，这构成了布雷迪违规行为；认为Jeff Pelley的律师没有有效地为其辩护，没有充分调查Bob Pelley在佛罗里达州的背景；认为Jeff Pelley的快速审判权被侵犯；并认为有新发现的证据可以证明Jeff Pelley的清白。 Craig Whitfield：坚持认为Jeff Pelley的牛仔裤是从洗衣机里取出来的，尽管没有警方的报告支持这一说法；承认在调查Pelley谋杀案之前与前主要侦探John Bowditch进行了广泛的讨论。 John Bowditch和John Cooney：坚持认为Jeff Pelley的牛仔裤是他用来杀害家人的，并且他洗了它们以销毁证据；John Bowditch否认从Jeff Pelley的车里搜出了衣服。 Tony Beeler：作证说Bob Pelley在死前告诉她，他参与了不法活动，并担心有人会杀害他和他的家人。 Kathy Hawley：作证说Bob Pelley告诉她，他在Landmark银行的数据中心发现了非法活动，并将其复制到软盘上。 Tom Cantinos：详细说明了Eric Dawson与Holly家族之间的联系，以及如果1989年印第安纳州的警方知道他在调查Phil Holley及其子孙的犯罪活动，这可能会影响印第安纳州当局对Bob Pelley及其家人谋杀案的调查途径。 Sheila和Irish Saunders：对播客中揭示的关于Bob Pelley在佛罗里达州的信息感到惊讶，并改变了他们对案件的看法；认为检察官在2006年故意隐瞒了重要的细节；对在播客播出后找到之前声称丢失的证据感到惊讶；Sheila还记得在最初的搜查中，警方没有彻底搜查她家对面的沼泽地。 Jackie Pelley：认为检察官故意隐瞒证据；对许多前执法调查人员在证据听证会上作证感到满意；相信她的父亲的佛罗里达州背景与谋杀案有关。 Jim Colonies：在1989年4月30日凌晨听到一辆车在他家附近快速行驶并停在沼泽地附近；在谋杀案发生后向警方报告了他所看到的情况，但他的报告没有被记录在案。

Deep Dive

Chapters
This chapter discusses the evidentiary hearing for Jeff Pelley, focusing on his defense team's arguments that his trial was marred by ineffective assistance, prosecutorial misconduct, and violations of his right to a speedy trial.

Shownotes Transcript

Less than a year after the release of CounterClock Season 3, Jeff Pelley is in an Indiana courtroom for the first time in more than a decade. His defense team has one shot at arguing his post-conviction case. 

Indiana University law professor Fran Watson claims the now 50-year-old, who is serving four consecutive 40 year sentences, deserves a new trial. Over a period of four days in Saint Joseph County Superior Court, Watson argued that Jeff had an ineffective trial attorney in 2006, prosecutor’s committed Brady violations, Jeff’s right to a speedy trial was violated, original and cold-case investigators fabricated evidence, and there was never-before explored evidence tied to Bob Pelley’s past in Florida that pointed to Jeff’s innocence but was repeatedly ignored by prior prosecutors and investigators.

Delia went back in Indiana to report on the updates in the case and let CounterClock listeners in on what she’s been following since Season 3 released.

 

For even more time with CounterClock, follow us on social media.