We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Note from Elie 5/23: Letitia James Started It, but Trump's Payback Isn't the Answer

Note from Elie 5/23: Letitia James Started It, but Trump's Payback Isn't the Answer

2025/5/23
logo of podcast The Counsel

The Counsel

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
E
Elie
Topics
Elie: 我认为 Letitia James 对 Donald Trump 的政治目的性起诉和 Trump 团队对 James 的报复行为,形成了一种恶性循环,最终不会有赢家。James 在竞选纽约州检察长时,就明确表示要针对 Donald Trump。在没有实际证据的情况下,James 就断言 Trump 参与了洗钱,并且可以被起诉。James 对 Trump 的起诉基于一个站不住脚的理由,即 Trump 在银行贷款申请中习惯性地高估其资产。James 在审判期间发表了不恰当的庭外言论,暴露了她打击 Trump 的动机。James 所谓的欺诈案受害者是那些已经获得全额偿还并从中获利的银行。Trump 赢得 2024 年大选,部分原因在于民众对 James 和其他检察官过度起诉的反感。Trump 公开表示要报复那些起诉和审判他的人。Trump 团队正在积极寻求对 James 的报复。Stephen Miller 对 James 提出了与 James 多年前对 Trump 相似的指控。Pulte 指控 James 在购买房产时提供了虚假信息,以获得更低的利率。James 否认了这些不当行为的指控,并称其为政治迫害。James 的律师承认 James 的文件中存在错误陈述,但认为这些错误是无意的且不重要的。James 的律师解释说,James 帮助她的侄女购买房产,并且 James 在文件中明确表示该房产不会是她的主要住所。联邦调查局正在调查 James 的案件。James 在回应调查时,不恰当地使用了她作为检察长的公共资源。James 将检察长办公室拖入她的个人麻烦中,可能会使她的同事成为潜在的证人。虽然 Pulte 的指控并非完全没有根据,但要起诉 James 仍然面临挑战,因为 Trump 渴望报复。即使联邦政府起诉 James,也很难定罪,因为证据不足,而且 James 在纽约仍然很受欢迎。James 对 Trump 的政治攻击是错误的,但这并不意味着 Trump 可以用同样带有恶意动机的起诉来报复她。武器化不是武器化的解药。James 发起了这场报复性的混乱,但这并不是结束它的方式。

Deep Dive

Chapters
Letitia James, while campaigning for New York Attorney General in 2018, explicitly targeted Donald Trump, vowing to take him down. After her victory, she pursued legal action against him, culminating in a civil fraud case with a substantial verdict against Trump. However, the case's flimsy nature and the AG's questionable actions during the trial raise serious concerns about political motivation.
  • Letitia James's 2018 campaign platform focused on prosecuting Donald Trump.
  • James declared Trump's guilt before seeing evidence.
  • The civil fraud case against Trump had a questionable basis, and involved questionable actions by James.
  • Multi-billion dollar banks, the purported victims, were fully repaid and profited from the loans.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Support for this show comes from Pure Leaf Iced Tea. When you find yourself in the afternoon slump, you need the right thing to make you bounce back. You need Pure Leaf Iced Tea. It's real brewed tea made in a variety of bold flavors with just the right amount of naturally occurring caffeine. You're left feeling refreshed and revitalized, so you can be ready to take on what's next. The next time you need to hit the reset button, grab a Pure Leaf Iced Tea. Time for a tea break? Time for a Pure Leaf.

Hey everyone, Ellie here, wishing you a happy Friday. Happy Memorial Day, Friday. Hope you have a really nice long weekend, restful long weekend ahead. It's graduation season. It's prom season. We've got both of those coming up in my house. I said this, I think two years ago when my son, my older son graduated. Now my youngest child, my daughter is on her way to graduating in a couple of weeks. They don't prepare you for this part as a parent. I mean, there's plenty about what to expect when you're expecting and what it's like to have a baby and all that.

But the thing that nobody really writes about or gets you prepped for is when the kids leave the house. So I'm dealing with it my ways. I'm flipping through old videos. Do people do that? I'm going back to videos from when they were

three and five and all that. It seems like a different lifetime. Anyway, those of you who are experiencing this as well, I'm sure there are a lot of you out there. I think a lot of our listeners are around the age I'm at and have children around the age of mine. I hear you, I'm with you. It's not easy, but it's also a time to be happy and celebrate. Okay, those are my deep thoughts. Now onto this week's piece. Hope you enjoy. Please send your thoughts, questions, and comments to lettersatcafe.com. ♪♪♪

It's a fact beyond reasonable dispute that Letitia James weaponized her official power as New York's attorney general to pursue Donald Trump for political purposes. It's equally clear that the Trump administration is now targeting James for payback. The downward spiral of prosecutorial retribution has begun and there will be no winners.

James started it when she ran for New York AG and won in 2018, primarily on an explicit platform of vote for me, fellow resistance warriors, and I'll nail Donald Trump. James tweeted that if elected, she would be leading the resistance against Donald Trump in New York City. She solicited campaign donations by vowing to take down the president. Before she had access to any evidence,

James declared conclusively that Trump, quote, engaged in a pattern and practice of money laundering and, quote, can be indicted for criminal offenses. The day after she won office, still having seen no actual evidence, the new AG exalted, quote, we're going to definitely sue him. We're going to be a real pain in the ass. He's going to know my name personally, end quote. For what?

Who knows? Just something. James did sue Trump, of course, and she won for the moment. After a circus-like bench trial focused on Trump's habitual overvaluation of his assets in bank loan applications, New York State Judge Arthur Angoran found Trump civilly liable for fraud and slammed him with damages amounting to over $500 million, including continually mounting interest. During the trial, James made a series of whispers.

wildly inappropriate out-of-court statements that would ordinarily get a prosecutor fired. At one point, she publicly branded Trump and his family members as liars while they were testifying. Despite the judge's verdict, James' theory of liability was so flimsy that it barely concealed her previously acknowledged motivation to stick one to Trump by any means available. The purported fraud victims...

were multi-billion dollar banks who were repaid in full on their loans to the Trump organization and made millions in profits through interest payments. Unsurprisingly, a New York appellate division panel voiced pointed skepticism of James's victimless case and seems poised to either substantially reduce the verdict or to throw it out altogether.

Just months after the verdict, Trump won the 2024 election, a result that was in some immeasurable but significant part a popular rejection of the overkill tactics deployed by James and other prosecutors who filed criminal charges against him. Before and after he won, Trump, like James,

made no secret of his passion for blood sport. He constantly vowed retribution on the campaign trail against his prosecutorial and judicial tormentors, including by name James N. N'Goran. And now his administration is working hard towards that ignoble goal. On April 13th, about a month ago, seemingly out of nowhere, Trump posited on social media that James was, quote, a totally corrupt politician and, quote, a wacky crook.

The very next day, Trump-nominated Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte sent a formal referral letter to the Justice Department. Pulte wrote that, quote,

White House advisor Stephen Miller offered an inflammatory take that paralleled James's uninformed, conclusory declarations years before. Miller said, quote, she is guilty of multiple significant serial criminal violations.

Pulte's allegations focus on two properties. First, he claims that in 2023, James bought a property in Virginia and falsely claimed in the paperwork that it would be her primary residence, which would result in lower interest rates. And according to Pulte's referral, James repeatedly certified falsely that a five-unit building she owns in Brooklyn contains only four units. Certain favorable loans are available only to owners of buildings with four or fewer units.

James has denied wrongdoing. An AG's office spokesperson called the investigation, quote, weaponization and declared that James, quote, will not be intimidated by bullies no matter who they are. James herself publicly dismissed the allegations as baseless.

James's personal attorney, Abby Lowell, who has made a career representing high-profile political players, including Hunter Biden, offered an impassioned but nuanced response in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Justice Department. Lowell concedes that James's paperwork did contain certain mistaken statements,

but argues that they were both inadvertent and insignificant. Lowell explains that James was helping her niece buy the property in Virginia and that James had made clear elsewhere in the paperwork that the home would not be her primary residence. And Lowell notes that the property in Brooklyn was in fact used as a four-unit dwelling, not five, and that official city paperwork at certain points stated that the building had four units.

The FBI confirmed this week that they're on the case. Director Kash Patel said during a Fox News interview, which apparently is how the administration now makes its formal announcements. This case, I can tell you, is being handled by our professional pros who are subject matter experts reporting directly to headquarters.

Well then, our professional pros, they got the heavy hitters on this one. James has again displayed dubious ethical instincts in her response to the pending inquiry. She has inexplicably chosen to use the resources of her public office, the AG's office, to respond to the investigation. James issued a statement through the AG's official spokesperson, and she reportedly plans to use state funds to cover at least some of her legal expenses. This is a dreadful,

idea. By dragging the AG's office into her personal mess, James has made some of her colleagues into potential witnesses and subjected them to subpoenas. Prosecutors might ask the AG's spokesperson, for example, what James initially said to him or her about the allegations. There's no privilege there. And it's unclear how the AG can justify using New York state taxpayer money to fund her personal criminal defense.

I have no idea if James ultimately will find herself on the other side of an indictment. The former prosecutor in me sees Pulte's allegations as something more than frivolous, but decidedly less than compelling at this point. Then again, Trump has openly pined for a payback prosecution, and it's hard to envision Bondi and the Justice Department denying him the thrill of retribution in the name of measured prosecutorial discretion.

If the feds do indict James, they're going to have a hellacious time convicting her. The evidence as we currently know it is decidedly mixed, whereas prosecutors must ultimately prove criminal intent beyond a reasonable doubt. And James remains a popular political figure in New York who has twice been elected comfortably to statewide office as AG in 2018 and then in 2022. It'll be tough finding a jury willing to convict her unanimously.

James was wrong to target Trump politically from her perch as AG, but that gives Trump no license to pay her back with an equally ill-motivated prosecution. Weaponization is no antidote to weaponization. James started this retributive mess, but this is no way to end it. Thanks for listening, everyone. Stay safe and stay informed.