BetterHelp Online Therapy bought this 30-second ad to remind you right now, wherever you are, to unclench your jaw, relax your shoulders, take a deep breath in and out.
Feels better, right? That's 15 seconds of self-care. Imagine what you could do with more. Visit betterhelp.com slash random podcast for 10% off your first month of therapy. No pressure, just help. But for now, just relax.
Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same premium wireless for $15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm
I'm told it's super easy to do at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of $45 for three-month plan equivalent to $15 per month required. Intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. See full terms at mintmobile.com.
Hello, this is Let's Talk About Myths, baby! Except, actually, it's not. Hi, I'm Liv. I'm here with something special today. I am here with another episode of Ancient History Fangirl. This is... I've played a... I guess at least one. I'm trying... Time is a flat circle. I'm here with another episode of Ancient History Fangirl. This time, it's...
honestly, just something I really wanted to put into my feed and to present to you all. Right now, Jen and Jenny, who as you probably know, are two very good friends of mine, so I won't pretend this isn't also that. But Jen and Jenny with Ancient History Fangirl right now are doing this kind of simultaneous series on the sort of
The end of the Roman Empire, as well as some other alternate side quests that I won't pretend I fully understand because they're doing so much and I love them for it. But this episode specifically, I listened to and I just thought immediately I would love to put this
this in my feed. I would love to share it with all of you and have you be aware of this series that they're working on because it is about how Rome fell as an empire, the long and slow decline of it. But in that story is an absolutely unimaginable amount of parallels.
And so without saying much more, I will just say that you can find the rest of this incredible series on the Ancient History Fangirl feed wherever you get your podcasts. I've linked to their website in the episode's description. Make sure you're subscribed to these guys. They are a member of the Memory Collective, just not on the podcast network, but they are a member of the collective. And this episode is about immigration.
forced immigration, migrants, and the horrors of the Roman Empire. And it, you know, it definitely doesn't resemble everything happening right now. And by that I mean, obviously, it absolutely does. But fuck, they did great in this episode. Enjoy. Cruelty is the point.
All day you have tasted the smoke in your throat from a hundred thousand fires all burning in one place. You have never come so close to a city before. Your parents tell you not to be afraid, that there will be other children in this city, other boys like you, boys fled from the fields and forests who speak your language. Maybe some of your friends from the village will be there. You will see them again, they say.
Your mother has filled your head with hope for a warm bed, a night at a hostel, shelter behind high walls. It's that safety you want most. Weeks ago you barely escaped the Huns and you still wake up with screaming nightmares. For days you walk beside the cart. You take turns driving the oxen and walking ahead to kick stones out of their way.
sometimes there are other refugees around you some of them carrying nothing some with entire households on their wagons you play and run with the children darting among the moving wagons avoiding cuffs and curses from the adults
finally after days and days of walking you see the walled city looming in the distance the great gates loom up over your head higher than any building you've seen roman sentries patrol the walls with bows drawn and helmets gleaming
A crowd has gathered outside the gates. Hundreds of ragged refugees. Your parents wait all day in the dust and the heat before they get close to the front. Your father is speaking to the sentries at the gate and there's a tenseness to their voices. You tug on your mother's tunic. Not now, says your mother, and she throws a glance at the door. A tenseness to her you've never seen before. Not even when the Huns were coming. Get in the wagon, she says in a low voice. Under the blankets.
ahead your father and the sentry are arguing their voices raise to shouts before you can move someone seizes your arm in a hard metal grip it hurts it's one of the roman sentries he says something to your mother words incomprehensible falling from his lips as harsh and pure as metal striking metal
The sentry and your father almost come to blows and your mother lunges for you. One of the guards hauls back and strikes her a clean hit to the jaw. She goes down and the crowd rises up in fury and suddenly you are in the middle of a riot. The crowd shoves and shoves and when the sentries draw their swords with a cold metal hiss, that's when they start screaming. You can't see your parents anymore. Only a furious group of refugees raising clubs and their bare hands against Roman steel.
Someone pulls you away from the riots, picks you up and shoves you into a cart, the kind used to transport slaves. It's already full of children and you are all crushed together, pushed against the bars. You still can't see your parents. You shout, where are my parents?
But the Romans ignore you. The cart lurches forward. You grasp at the bars, losing your balance. The children are crying all around you, screaming for their parents. Somewhere in the crowd you think you catch sight of your father, lunging after you as a sword punches through his chest. And then the gate closes.
What did you just see? The cart is through the gates and you fall back away from the bars. Did you see that? Was it real? You must be dreaming. Your father is not dead. He cannot die. Your mother is outside the gates and soon she will find you. You'll wake up soon, in the hostel she promised. Any minute, you'll wake up. I'm Jenny Williamson. And I'm Jen McMenemy.
And this is Ancient History Fangirl. Whew, that feels like a little rip from the headlines there, Jenny. This season, it's really difficult sometimes to read and record and be a part of given the state of the world today. I'm really heartbroken by that cold open, but I'm glad that you wrote it. This is still happening. In our last episode, we took a look at the outside forces driving the engine of the migration era, Hunnic migrations and invasions,
Constant displacement and conflict at the Roman borders. And if you look at that alone, it's easy to get a picture of the migration era as caused by forces outside of Roman control and outside of Roman borders. That isn't the full picture. The reality is that Goths did not live just outside of Rome's borders. They lived inside Rome too, in the heart of the Italian peninsula, side by side with Italians, and also in the outer provinces, in territories that were conquered by force.
Some didn't choose to live in the Roman Empire. The empire came to them, and how they were treated within that empire fueled and fed that violence. It kept the wheel spinning. Goths living inside Rome also revolted during those Gothic wars. They joined with Goths on the outside to wreak havoc whenever they could, and sometimes the Goths on the outside...
became the Goths on the inside and vice versa. I'm feeling like inside and outside Gauls from the Vercingetorix episode, right? Right, the inside and outside Gauls. I mean, it's different because the borders were porous is what I'm trying to say. As Jenny said, these boundaries were porous and Rome's policies about immigrants, citizens, in groups and out groups played a huge role in how things actually played out. This story isn't just about Goths that lived outside Rome. It's
It's also about the Goths that lived inside the empire as everything from slaves to soldiers to free citizens. A huge source for this episode is Douglas Boyne's outstanding book, Alaric the Goth, An Outsider's History of the Fall of Rome. It is such an excellent book, and it's one of the most evocative and thorough I've found in discussing conditions not just outside the Roman Empire on those contentious borders, but inside it as well.
Boyne really zeroes in on the immigrant experience in Rome leading up to and during Alaric's invasions of Rome. So I'm going to be relying heavily on that here. And we did an interview with him recently. It's called In Search of the Real Alaric. You should give it a listen. Yeah, it's a great interview and he's just really fascinating. I believe you can find him on Instagram. We highly recommend checking out the work he's doing. Yeah.
One of the reasons I haven't done a series on this before and why I struggled so much to understand the full history of the Goths in the Roman Empire was that we're not just talking about one relationship between these two people.
We're talking about many very complex relationships between the Roman Empire and multiple groups of Goths outside the borders and inside. Because while the Goths were outsiders, they were, to some extent, insiders too. They were slaves and slave owners, federati, soldiers in the Roman army proper, merchants and laborers, and everyone in between. There was even a half-Gothic emperor as early as the 200s,
It was Maximinius Thrax. Maybe. I mean, this is a little bit questionable because the only source for this is the historian Augusta, but it's possible. Adding some levity to this dark season, my dog Jake's middle name is Maximinius. He's Max after Maximinius Thrax because Jenny is like, I really think you should name a tiny dog Maximinius Thrax, like a teacup poodle. And Jake's a Yorkie, so pretty close. Yeah, that was like...
the running joke in that episode, I think it was one of the Child Emperor episodes or something. Or no, it was one of the Praetorian Guard episodes, very early episode where we talk about Maximinius Thrax. And like, he was like this big, muscular, manly man. And like, he had such a like, kind of bruiser name that I thought the funniest thing about him was that this is a name somebody should give a tiny dog. Yeah, and it kind of it kind of came back to me a little after I'd started getting the dog used to his first name. So that's his middle name whenever he's naughty.
So moving away from the levity. Oh, are we moving away from the levity now? I mean, we kind of have to. Never to return until this episode is over. I mean, look, this is going to be a long season. It's going to be the first season we can currently run with another season alternating with it that are both the beginning and end of an empire.
So it's going to be a lot of dark stuff, but we will inject levity where we can, including my very silly looking poopy dog. So inside the empire, any individual goth's place in it would have varied depending on social status, geographic location, whether this particular goth assimilated well into Roman society or
and a wide range of other factors. We can't break down every single relationship each Gothic person had with the Roman Empire. That would have been as unique as fingerprints, right? And it's kind of also the experience that, like, many immigrants have in their new countries. Like, they're all different experiences. Like, my experience in the UK as an immigrant in that country is very different from other people's experiences, even though, like, we might have come from the same country. So, again, it is all individual, and you need to kind of, like, keep that in your mind. However...
What we can do is talk about the immigrant experience in Rome and how that would have applied to the Goths broadly and inequities that would have fueled the conflicts that were such a part of the migration era. Here's one thing I want to flag is that racists have argued in the past, based on this history, that it was immigrants who
who were the cause of the Roman Empire's downfall because they didn't assimilate well enough. I thought it was queer people. I thought it was licentiousness. I thought it was, like, climate change. I mean, climate change I would believe. I thought it was the lead in the aqueducts that were slowly making everyone go insane. Well, that I also would believe. Look, these are plausible.
Then there's like, oh, you know, it was all of those brown people, you know, like that's what the racists are saying. Essentially, that isn't what I'm arguing at all. I'm arguing that the way ancient Rome treated its immigrants, its cultural divisions at all levels of society and its violence toward them led to a level of instability that contributed to its unraveling in a way that in some places is shockingly similar to conditions today. We are not blaming the immigrants. We are blaming the inequality and the bigotry. And as you'll see...
There were many immigrants who were not immigrants by choice. They were people in areas that Rome conquered, and then what they would do is settle there and call the indigenous people who already lived there foreigners on their own soil and treat them like immigrants. That's what they would do. So you could just not go into Rome at all and find yourself, quote unquote, an immigrant or a foreigner in the place you've lived all your life. Kind of like the idea of, I don't know, taking over Greenland.
Calling everyone who lives in Greenland foreigners. Yeah, or Canada. Or Ukraine. I don't know. Like, this isn't happening. This isn't applicable to today at all, you guys.
So we're going to talk a little bit about Roman citizenship, which is really complicated. So bear with us. As we said, the conflicts of the migration era weren't just about outsiders being driven out of their homes by the Huns and hurled into the borders of a hostile empire. They were also about Goths inside the empire, disaffected with how things were and joining groups like Alaric's in droves. It was about people on the borders living in Rome's shadow, shut out from opportunities and
and how that experience wound up radicalizing them. Alaric is a prime example of this. His region in Dacia, the pine tree island, had once been Roman territory and then was ceded. His people may have once been considered Roman citizens and were still Romanized.
He was still close to the border, his people still subject to slave raids, and because his people didn't have full citizenship, they could be enslaved, whereas those on the other side, the literal other side of the river, couldn't be enslaved. Wild. At least some of them, the ones that were full citizens.
Exactly. Alaric could probably see over the border, see how life was better, people were more wealthy, and there was more opportunity. Opportunities that should have been open to him, but it turns out weren't. That could have been a big part of Alaric's story, and that's how Douglas Boyne interprets it. I can't tell this story without going in-depth into Roman citizenship.
Which is a thing I also tried to avoid during this podcast. Like there were other opportunities I've had to go in depth into Roman citizenship, but looking just peeling back the hood on that and just looking in, it is complicated, you guys.
There were lots of different levels of citizenship in the Roman Empire. It varied based on time period, location, the social status and rank of the individual in question, their gender, and a range of other factors. The oldest right we have of a right to Roman citizenship is the Twelve Tables.
which dates to roughly 449 BC. The Twelve Tables were an original document outlining the laws of Rome, and while we currently only have fragments, there once would have been a copy of these set up in the Roman Forum for anyone to look at. The Twelve Tables outlines the rights of free citizens of Rome with regard to property, court proceedings, death, and inheritance.
and expectations around public behavior. This one mainly applies to women who must be strictly controlled, naturally, and also weren't citizens. Well, I mean, that's actually not true. I think...
time period, depending on the individual woman's status and stuff. But women were citizens. It's just that they had a lot less rights as citizens, as far as I understand it. You're right. And I take it back. Women could be citizens, but they did not have the same rights. And they most certainly didn't have any votes or the same property rights and stuff that men had. So there's a lot of inequality. And I feel the need to just keep hammering this home when I hear people suggest that women who don't have children should maybe not have as many votes as people who do. Moving on.
And if you think natalism isn't part of empire building, you'd be wrong. We'll get to that, don't worry. Male citizens had certain responsibilities, such as taxes and military service. If you refused to serve in the military, for instance, you might lose your right to vote, and this actually happened in the Second Punic War. Is that the one where Hannibal won over the Alps? Yes.
Yeah, I think so. Because the third one was the big siege. Yeah, I don't know that I'd want to fight in that war with the guy who's like, I'm going to be so badass, I'm going over the Alps with war elephants. But you know. The fun thing is, Jen, you might not have a choice. The battle might come to you. Well, that's actually what he did, right? He went over the Alps. It came to them. Exactly. And then he's just wandering around in Italy, you know, raising towns and trampling your garden with his elephants.
Me and war elephants, we have a very tacit agreement. We're very good friends. You invite them in, you offer them a cocktail. I do. I give them a human gall cocktail. I'm not going to tell them where I got the human gall from, but you know. I have a vat of human gall in the back just in case any war elephants show up and I might have to placate them with drink. Absolutely. I make them a nice little frosé, a little human gall. It's fine. These are survival tactics when shit hits the fan in ancient Rome. Or modern America. Yeah.
So, general rights of citizens included the right to own property, vote, hold civic office, only if you were an aristocrat, and depending on the time period, and also only if you were a man. That depends on the time period. There were times when non-aristocrats, like plebeians, could vote and hold public office. That's not always true. So, your dad, or the male head of the household, had the right to execute you at any time, at any time.
at any age. Although this may have only really been used in practice to decide whether to expose an infant or raise it, the man got to make that decision. So citizenship included, from its earliest history, a man's right to rule life or death over his family. Roman citizens had certain protections. The right not to be tortured, not to be whipped, not to be enslaved, not to be executed, unless by your head of household.
A death sentence could be commuted to voluntary exile, and while some offenses were still death sentences like treason, Roman citizens could not be crucified even for that. Other legal rights included the right to enter into a contract, the right to appeal a court decision, to bring a lawsuit to the court, or be sued and have a legal trial, the right to have your citizenship passed down to your children, and the right not to pay certain taxes and follow certain onerous local rules. Details depend on your location and the time period.
And while those rules seem kind of less dramatic than the ones about enslavement and execution, they were no less important. Because built into citizenship from its earliest times was a mechanism where people on the inside could dominate those on the outside. They had certain advantages.
not just in how the state treated them, but in how they were treated under the law. As I always tell you over and over, I feel like it's my catchphrase, Jenny. When people talk about the vaunted democracy of ancient Rome, we always have to ask democracy for who? Who has a vote and who has a right to take part in that democracy? It's pretty narrow.
It's the same thing here with citizenship, right? Citizenship for who? Rights for who? Even among full citizens, some had the right to vote and hold office while others didn't. Women were technically citizens but they couldn't vote, couldn't serve in public office, their public behavior was severely constricted, severely constrained, and their husbands had rights over them, including the right to execute them or dictate whether they exposed their children.
Sounds like they don't have a lot of bodily autonomy here, Jenny. This doesn't frighteningly sound like something that could happen today. None of this should surprise you because we are still mucking around in the basement of the patriarchy. Yeah, and we're still dealing with people who think that this was a great way to structure a society and live their lives. And of course, enslaved people were not citizens. Their masters had complete control over them.
Freedmen, slaves who had been set free, were not automatically citizens. They had more rights than an enslaved person, but not by a lot. As Rome expanded, it colonized different regions and started taking a carrot-and-stick approach to integrating conquered communities. The stick, of course, was war and occupation. If people didn't accept Roman rule, they could expect any rebellion to be violently crushed.
The carrot was that if they did accept Roman rule, certain people would be afforded at least some privileges of Roman citizenship, all the comforts and luxuries and wealth of being part of the great might of Rome, and for some, a chance for upward mobility that may not have existed among the entrenched power structure of the pre-existing culture, or for the cooperative upper class, a chance to preserve that status in a world that was now completely overturned. And we talk about this in...
An episode that is pretty far back in our history now. It's the Ben Aronovich episode, Rivers of Old Londinium. I feel like that episode was really eye-opening in terms of how the Romans completely overturned existing power structures in the communities that they conquered, which could work in the favor of some people, depending on where and when.
Exactly. And it also like really gave me a different insight into how upending that class system and promoting other people or allowing some people to have more power than would traditionally be given to them, like in Boudicca's case, not acknowledging her rule, created this instability and destabilization and allowed the Romans to sort of put people in charge that would work best for them. And while also sort of eroding the cultural identity and autonomy of the people.
It's divide and conquer. Like the Romans were basically providing incentives to colluders to side with them against their own people by saying, yeah, in our regime, you can be in charge or in our regime, you can have citizenship. You can have all these rights that you didn't have before.
Offering certain people citizenship in that process was just one tool that they had in their arsenal. We really see it at work in situations like, yeah, Boudicca and other places. They did this a lot in Britain. Anyway, when an invasion started, citizenship was sometimes offered individually to local leaders in conquered territories to get them to help the Romans conquer their own people. When Romans expanded into Britain, as Jenny just said, they offered citizenship to some prominent tribal leaders on an individual basis,
to make them allies, and as Rome expanded, it started offering some privileges of citizenship to whole populations. This was usually not full citizenship status as you would get if you were born in Rome to two citizen parents, though. It was varied case by case. The rights varied depending on the place and time period. Some examples of various levels of rights in the Roman Empire include... Or it might be the Roman Republic depending on history.
Latin rights. At the end of the Latin War in 338 BC, the Romans extended certain rights to people living in areas of Italy that had come under Roman control during the war. People had the right to practice business in Rome, the right to move around in Roman-controlled areas without losing citizenship, and some other rights but not full citizenship rights. Socii or federati rights.
Groups that were not in Rome, but allied to Rome or conquered territories, were sometimes given some legal rights as long as they provided soldiers for Roman wars. And this is where a lot of Federati military groups come from.
A lot of friction was caused over the course of Rome's history because of the paltriness of these rights versus the high manpower demands of these conscriptions. Conscription of his people was a key concern of Alaric's. Provincial rights. The provincials were people who lived in conquered areas under Roman control, who had some rights but
Quite a bit less than full citizenship, and it would really depend on the treaty that your leaders had negotiated with Rome when they were conquered. Exactly. Peregrini, and this means foreigner, and refers to anyone living in areas under Roman control.
who had only the most basic sets of rights. Romans considered them immigrants on their own soil. These are the people who are native to this territory who are now being considered foreigners in their own land. I just, my brain is broken.
Yeah, a noted example of that is the Welsh. We talk about that in our series on the conquest of Britain, which starts with the Druids episode, Last Stand of the Druids. So these were just some of the classes of Roman citizenship that you might have. There are many others. And if you didn't have full 100% Roman citizenship rights, you would be at a class disadvantage. You might not have the right to vote or run for office. So you couldn't have a say in determining the rules of your own community.
Your kids might not automatically be citizens, so they would have fewer rights than you do. You might not have the right to marry anyone outside your own citizenship class.
You might not have the right to leave any inheritance to your children on your death. We see this at work with Boudicca. So you couldn't build wealth for later generations. You could be at a disadvantage in the courts if, say, a full citizen wanted to challenge your ownership of land or property. Full citizens were automatically favored by the courts if there was a dispute. A full citizen could theoretically just take your house or land, as I understand it. I'm not 100% sure, but that's what it seems like to me.
And if you had a legal dispute, you might not have the right to bring it up in court. Your local law enforcement could torture you with impunity if they thought you had information about a crime. You could be whipped or sentenced to death or be crucified. You might not have the right to not be enslaved, meaning you could be enslaved. You might be facing conscription, willing or not, because of the terms of the treaty that your leaders made with the Roman government. And a lot of times those treaties were kind of treaties at knife point, you know?
Oh, absolutely. Yeah. These are treaties made by the conquered with the conqueror. Exactly. So you weren't getting the best terms. These weren't things that were being negotiated with people having equal footing to, you know, make certain concessions for each other, right? This is very much lose everything. I would say it really does depend. Some places the Romans would probably give them better terms depending on how much it would cost to conquer.
fully conquer them versus negotiate this treaty with them. Probably also the time period what was going on back in Rome and where their resources could be spent. You know, other wars that might be happening that would take away from it if they had to conquer a certain place. It's a complicated issue, but for the most part, these treaties were not being negotiated on equal terms. There's definitely...
times in Roman history where they're in the midst of fighting a war and then some other fire breaks out over here and the emperor has to negotiate a settlement with the people he was just fighting with so he can go and put out that fire. And I would guess, I'm not 100% sure, but I would guess that in those cases, those people maybe get better terms. This heavily varies on the individual circumstances.
But yeah. Yeah, and we are speaking in broad strokes here. So there were different levels of rights or lack of rights for women, freedmen, freed enslaved people, immigrants, and others of differing social classes in various territories under different Roman treaties at different times.
To sort through it all, we would need an ancient Roman law degree, probably an advanced law degree. But let's just say that from the beginning, the Romans were very, very used to vast inequalities in their society where large groups of people were treated differently under the law. They were used to full citizens having every advantage, including lawmaking and legal privileges over conquered peoples who now lived in the empire not by choice but by conquest.
And this of course led to and fed into interpersonal dynamics of derision, contempt, and violence against those deemed "other" even when those others were in fact legally fellow Romans. In 212 AD, the Emperor Caracalla issued the Edict of Caracalla which granted all free men and women full Roman citizenship. All free men would have all the same rights as full citizen men and all free women the same rights as full citizen women. This did not include slaves.
No.
The old habit of looking down on the other went too deep, and legal inequities remained. First off, women and men still didn't have the same rights, let's not get crazy, and enslaved people still had absolutely no rights or bodily autonomy because this is still the worst.
The Edict of Caracalla also didn't apply to the Dedetici, a broad category of people living in conquered regions, various types of immigrants and former enslaved people who had committed serious wrongdoings before being manumitted, or, and this is key, had been punished by their masters for doing wrong, whether they did wrong or not. Having
committed serious wrongdoing, that's a thing that your master determines about you, whether or not you actually did that thing. I don't think there's any mechanism of investigation here. So if you lived on the border of the Roman Empire, if you were part of a society that had been conquered by the Romans, you still might have lesser rights than other Roman citizens, even after the Edict of Caracalla.
And use code ACAST at checkout.
Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same premium wireless for $15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today.
I'm told it's super easy to do at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of $45 for three-month plan equivalent to $15 per month required. Intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. See full terms at mintmobile.com.
My husband and I recently realized that neither of us were getting the sleep we deserved. So we sat down and talked about our ideal beds. For him, soft as feathers. For me, firm as a plank. This would be a huge issue if it weren't for the Sleep Number smart bed.
Thankfully, with our new Sleep Number smart bed, we can each dial in our desired sleep number settings to our ideal comfort and finally get the sleep we deserve. Plus, the Climate Series feature makes sure our bed stays nice and cool through the warm summer months. Why choose a Sleep Number smart bed?
So you can choose your ideal comfort on either side. And now it's the Sleep Number Everything Smart Bed Sale. Every smart bed and base are on sale during our Memorial Day event. Up to 50% off, limited time, exclusively at a Sleep Number store near you. See store or sleepnumber.com for details.
This is Jenny Williamson from Ancient History Fangirl here to tell you about my upcoming scorching romance novel, Enemy of My Dreams. In the last days of the Roman Empire, a desperate princess and a brutal gothic warlord forged a dangerous alliance.
Julia, only daughter of the Emperor of Rome, lives a life of excess and freedom. But when her father dies and her teenage brother takes the throne, he will stop at nothing to seize control of both the Empire and his wayward sister. And now Alaric of the Visigoths, a ferocious warrior who has battled Rome for years, has come to the capital to bargain for his homeland. Realizing how perilous her position is, Julia impulsively turns to Alaric, the Empire's sworn enemy, and the one man who can make Rome tremble.
Best-selling author Elodie Harper says, quote, this is a hugely entertaining Roman world romandicy with a hilarious heroine and smoldering hero whose adventures in love and war are set against the backdrop of the last dangerous days of an ancient empire. Enemy of My Dreams is available wherever books are sold.
So Jen, around this time, you might be wondering, if you were ambitious and wanted the upward mobility that came from buying fully into the system, could you rise in status and gain full Roman citizenship? Could your citizenship rank change? So the answer is that it depends.
And for what I understand, it's kind of rare, there were ways to do this. One way was military service. As a member of a conquered people, at some times, depending on a lot of things probably, you could earn Roman citizenship if you served in the Roman auxiliaries like Alaric did, I think. So some people with lesser citizenship privileges joined the military voluntarily to improve their status.
but many others were conscripted without their consent because of a treaty their leaders signed with Rome. This may have been a major factor in at least some Gothic wars and rebellions that we told you about in the last episode.
Peter Heather mentions how some of the Gothic rebellions can be timed to military campaigns that the Roman emperors were waging and were probably at least partially caused by mass mobilization of Gothic populations inside the Roman Empire who did not want to fight in those wars. In other words, the Goths rebelled when they were too heavily conscripted.
But also, as I said, some Goths enlisted voluntarily, sometimes to improve their status in the Roman world. And also one other key thing about the army is it was steady pay. And that was kind of rare outside of that setting. Absolutely. And, you know, you're talking about people who have been moved around and may or may not have like a actual home that is theirs. You know, like this would give them a steady pay, some kind of roof over their head, be it a tent or whatever, like they would have
things that they maybe didn't have before or were having problems getting within, like, Roman society for a host of reasons. One of those things would be land, because you could become a landowner after your service. There would be these land grants for veterans. And land grants for veterans is always this big contentious beast that emperors were dealing with. Like, where would they get the land? Where would they put the veterans? The veterans weren't getting the land. They were promised. So now we have a revolt. You know, like, this is kind of a big theme. But theoretically, you could...
retire after your service in the military and be a landowner with a significantly higher status in life than you had when you began. So this is one of the ways that you raise your status in the system. This is still something that does happen for people to get citizenship. This is part of how my grandfather got citizenship when he came over from Italy in the
in the 20th century. So, you know, we still do this. You know, it's not something that has changed. Free college, you know, other benefits for veterans. Like, there's still that promise we have now in America, theoretically, that you enter the military and you can come out with all these benefits that can boost your status in life. And it's something that can give you another path to citizenship. I certainly know that that was the case in the mid-20th century. I suspect it probably is today, too. So...
I don't know what Alaric's citizenship status was, but it's possible he was one of those ambitious people, born on the edge of an empire on the wrong side of the river, who tried to rise through the ranks and gain citizenship from the inside. Being
Being denied his ambitions was radicalizing to him. That's one way to write his story. Douglas Boyne takes this view. And if this is not true for Alaric, or completely true for him, it certainly was for many of the people who followed him.
But the inequities weren't just about the laws on the books about what citizenship rights various people had. It also had to do with Romanitas, colloquially known as the Roman way of life. Who had it and who didn't? This is where those biases were in play that kept certain people down regardless of the edict of Caracalla. Having Romanitas meant being culturally Roman, and while it was vaguely defined, it
It implied in-groups and out-groups. Douglas Boyne tells us that, quote, mockery and derision, end quote, was part of the immigrant experience, as many Romans saw new immigrants as not being sufficiently culturally Roman. And here's another quote from Douglas Boyne. Quote, citizens and non-citizens still lived side by side, sometimes in the same Roman village,
but they had widely different legal rights. The language of the bureaucracy variously categorized these immigrants as allies, federati, transfers, dedetici, or fortunate ones, laeti. But they stayed confined to these categories of Latin legalism with no mechanism for attaining full citizenship status. As a result, foreigners could...
regularly expect ridicule through no fault of their own for their ethnic dress, their language, or the cultural practices they brought with them. Everyone insults the immigrant, the 4th century Latin poet Claudian sneered. I mean, to be fair, Claudian sneered at everybody. Like, he was big on the sneering. Douglas Boyne tells us that as the empire moved into the 400s, a sense of virulent xenophobia grew. Roman poets and playwrights worked anti-immigrant themes into their most popular works.
Aristocrats decorated their gardens with statues of conquered, quote, noble savages dying or committing suicide. Drunk crowds at chariot races would chant for immigrants to be thrown out of cities just as, you know, part of their rambunctiousness. Despite the fact that, as Boyne points out from a Roman writer, quote, the Roman people had always been dependent on the help of these same foreigners for their livelihood. Gosh, Jen, does this sound familiar? I don't know, Romanitas, American eyes.
Make America something something. Something about assimilation. English is now the national language of the country. And yet we depend on these same immigrants for our livelihood. Yeah.
stop because I'm just like, I get that like depressed laugh where I'm just like, if I don't laugh, I'll cry. I mean, look, once you see it, you can't unsee it. And we are giving you guys all of this so that you can live in it with us and not unsee it. And also so you have a framework to understand what's happening and, you know, to help you look at ways in which you can dismantle this way of thinking in your own lives. Yeah.
Romanitas. Romanitas. Romanitas.
The Goths wore beards and had long hair. They wore trousers and animal skins. Moustaches! Fantastical moustaches. Civilized Romans. Romans with the real Romanitas. Romanitas! They found the Gothic culture weird, incomprehensible, and violent. They did not assimilate well. At least, according to this account. And Douglas Boyne explains it like this. Quote,
After Caracalla's law, to be treated with dignity in the later empire always depended on how one dressed, how one spoke, and how one behaved. The acceptance of immigrants in Alaric's time was not, as it were, based on tolerance or on open-mindedness or even on protected legal principles. It was based on a self-righteous sense of
of Roman cultural superiority. Basic rights were never guaranteed, for apart from its volumes of laws and the emperor's occasional declarations, the ancient Romans lacked any formal drafted constitution. If the lowliest Roman citizen disapproved of how a foreigner looked,
sounded, or acted, there was no recourse from this discrimination. Foreigners were at the mercy of these racial and ethnic structural biases and suffered disproportionately for them. Even soldiers felt slighted in their day-to-day routines.
There's an example of a violent clash involving a local Gothic community that occurred in the 380s AD, probably while Alaric was still a teenager. It happened in Thessaloniki, a Greek town on the northeastern border of the Aegean Sea. Thessaloniki was a seaside resort town with a robust sports culture, and in that town, there were a lot of chariot racing hooligans. A military officer named Butheric had a renowned charioteer arrested for pederasty.
He was trying to rape a miner in a tavern? At the time, the punishment for pederasty was death, and you would think that this would be a fairly straightforward case. But Butheric, the Roman soldier doing the arresting, was a goth. And this was a really popular sports star. When he arrested the charioteer, the crowd rioted, not just because their favorite charioteer was arrested, but also because of pent-up xenophobic rage against goths in general, this goth in particular.
I know. A furious mob captured Butherik and hanged him in the circus. And that's not like the fun circus. That's like the circus Maximus, I'm guessing, or like a track pretty much. I think it's like the chariot racing track. I think so. Yeah. I think.
It was also the fun circus, like just a different fun circus. Well, it was a racing circus. It wasn't like the elephant one. So you probably would see that more in like the arena, but it wouldn't be fun for the elephants. Right. Fun for who, Jen? Fun for who? This is the story of my life.
In retaliation, the Emperor Theodosius sent more soldiers of Gothic descent into the city, slaughtering as many as 7,000 men, women, and children in the span of three hours. That was how the Romans calmed things down, which no doubt did not inflame racial tensions at all. The story is that this was a pointed...
Slaughter of Roman citizens by Gothic soldiers in particular because Theodosius wanted to send a message. Stamping down your xenophobia with an act that no doubt is going to inspire a lot more xenophobia. I mean, I just love how these lawmakers understand how to sort out a problem and not just pour gasoline on it. Wait.
Wait. Dump a bucket of gasoline on that fire. So this event in general is not well documented. Not all ancient sources agree on the details, but this is just one example of how violent the tensions between Gothic immigrants and other Romans could get. And this wasn't the only instance of that violence. Here's another one.
From around the same time period. If you listened to our episode on Alaric, or in any of the episodes previously to this one because I've talked about it a lot, you already know how, in the year 376 AD, a group of Goths living just north of the Danube on the western coast of the Black Sea, Alaric's people, were pushed over the Danube River and into Rome by invading Huns.
Fleeing violence, 30,000 people tried to cross the river in rafts made out of hollow logs. Many drowned. Those who survived were warehoused in refugee camps. The emperor sent food, but corrupt Roman soldiers sold it and left the refugees to starve. Those Gothic refugees eventually broke out of the camps, and some never made it into the camps as this particular group of Goths wasn't the only one affected by the Huns.
People were pouring over the borders in droves. This event became known as the Gothic Refugee Crisis of 376.
Douglas Boyne tells us that hostility toward immigrants, Goths in particular, led to atrocities when Gothic refugees were forced into Rome. Quote, this generalized hostility probably explains why, as Goths crossed the border in 376, lacking much money with which to purchase food or water, many fell victim to the border guards who preyed on the immigrants' vulnerabilities. The
The new immigrants were acting like wild animals who would escape from their cages, the Romans said. Goths made decent cooks and butlers, but why were they camped in their wagons on Roman land? Demoralized Gothic men, the heads of families, learned to be wary. Dinner invitations were extended by enthusiastic Roman soldiers with the pretense of camaraderie. Only the Goths never came home after the purported meal.
So Boyne talks about how luring foreign dignitaries to assassination banquets had kind of become a tool
of Roman statecraft by this point. That is so fucked up. It happened to inconvenient leaders that the Romans wanted gone. But Boyne tells us here that it was also happening to ordinary people. Roman soldiers would lure Gothic men, leaders of their communities, to dinners, perhaps with promises of cooperation and protection for their people, only to murder them. Because, yeah, the Romans are the bad guys here. When people are like, oh, Rome was such a shining democracy on a hill. Absolutely.
know if they know about the assassination banquets. I don't know if they do, but they do now. Now they can't unsee it. Douglas Boyne continues, quote, At the Danube border, nervous Roman cities increasingly often locked their gates when they saw ragged Gothic mothers with children coming to the markets. Jourdain says that some Gothic parents relinquished their children to slavery during these hard years because they concluded it was better to lose liberty than life. One Roman called the human trafficking morally justifiable.
So the refugee crisis eventually led to one of the Gothic Wars from 376 to 382 AD. And this Gothic War is a prime example of how the migration era conflicts were caused not just by factors outside the Roman borders, but by those inside Rome to do specifically with Roman culture and xenophobia that fueled the conflict.
And there's one event I want to zero in on here. The year was 377 AD. The refugee Goths had broken out of their camps. Refugee Gothic women and children with no money were causing tension in Roman towns by existing and needing help. Romanized Goths who lived among the Romans for years were joining the rebellion. And in this incendiary environment, border guards started separating Gothic boys aged about 8 to 10 from their parents at the border.
The plan was to distribute these boys among Roman families in various cities and towns, separating them from their cultures and ensuring they grew up with the appropriate amount of Romanitas. So what the Romans were afraid of was a large group of armed Goths inside their borders who might get violent, which was really already happening. They wanted to cut the next generation off at the knees. I mean, ask Arminius how that went down when they did that to him and his people.
Ask Butherick how it went down. Ask Germanicus where those eagles are. Right. Seriously, like the way that the Romans wanted to tap down on xenophobic violence was adding more xenophobic violence to the fire. This does not at all sound like something that could happen right now in today's world. No, never mind. Separating children from their parents at the border. Parents and children who are fleeing violent situations in their own homeland who don't have a choice.
and then not keeping good records to put people back together once the crisis has been managed. No spoilers. So, Gothic boys were being separated from their parents at the border and fostered in Roman homes. Again, does this sound familiar? The soldiers were also separating Gothic wives and daughters from their families and taking them as sex slaves. This was also the fate of boys that the soldiers found attractive.
So, this is how Douglas Boyne describes it. Quote, State resources were soon allocated to implement the border separation policy in full. An office of the Roman government was set up to oversee the relocation program, and a military appointee received a government salary to manage it.
The rugged plateaus and cities beyond the Taurus Mountains in Roman Asia were identified as suitable holding pens for the children. Gothic children were forced to say goodbye not only to a familiar landscape of childhood memories but their actual parents, grandparents, and siblings. No documentation was ever kept, as far as historians know, that would have identified the children or helped reunite them with their families. An obvious paper trail, in fact, is quite likely what the Roman government wanted to avoid.
Cruelty was the intention. Many gothic parents never saw their sons again. Have you heard the saying, cruelty is the point, about the MAGA movement? Yep. Cruelty was the intention. This is a playbook. Some of these people in charge know exactly what they're doing and they're taking some shit out of history's darkest corners, excavating it, not to understand and avoid it.
They're weaponizing it again. Inflicted on us in modern times. Cruelty is the point. Not long after this, in the summer of 378, the Emperor Valens traveled to the Danube frontier to personally neutralize the violent bands of Gothic bandits ravaging the countryside. A
A battle erupted, the Battle of Adrianople, and Valens was wounded by an arrow. He was taking refuge in a farmhouse when the Goths set it on fire. At least, that's one version of his death. I'm cool with that version. There are multiple versions, and I will go into detail on all of them in a later episode. Get excited. The Romans were incensed.
Because of the death of their emperor. Due to a problem they created. But anyway. Absolutely. Before the next emperor could even give an order, the Roman official overseeing the separation program enacted his revenge. He gave orders to the officials in all towns and cities where the Gothic boys were housed. Quote, call an assembly on your own. Offer financial assistance to all the boys placed with Roman families. Gather the refugee children in the marketplaces and town squares.
And then, as the boys were gathered, archers stationed on the walls shot the boys down, one by one, their blood running red in the market squares across Rome.
They were all standing in a town square, these innocent little boys between age 8 and 10, and they were shot by professional archers who were stationed there with one purpose, to kill them and watch their blood stain the Roman streets across the empire and send a message. Fuck you.
This is not the only time the Romans took revenge on Gothic families living integrated in their own cities. Prior to Alaric's last invasion of Rome in the early 400s AD, the official Olympias had the general Stilicho murdered and then gave the order for the families of Gothic federati troops all up and down the Italian peninsula to be murdered in their homes, men, women, and children. For this reason,
30,000 disaffected Roman troops stationed in towns inside Italy joined Alaric in taking their grievance to the gates of Rome itself. Is it any mystery? There was tension between Goths and Romans during this period, exacerbated by the climate change, violent incursions from the Huns, and upheaval of the migration era. This is not a simple story.
It's complicated, and I want to zero in on one of the Gothic wars and tell the story in more detail, because this war, the Gothic War of 376 to 382 AD, was where it all began. It's the melting crucible that gave rise to the Migration Era as it was defined by most historians. But not just that. It's the war that made everything wrought by Alaric possible. This is the moment where everything changed, where the measure of power tilted towards the Goths.
where the Roman Empire, by some accounts, started its centuries-long fall. In the next episode, we'll be telling you the story of the Gothic refugee crisis and of the Gothic War of 376 to 382 in more detail. Because it's the bedrock on which everything else was built. And it's a wild story. Strap in, bring your tissues. So that's it for this week. Join us in two weeks for the next installment in this story.
In the meantime, join us at Ancient History Fangirl at Instagram, Blue Sky, and TikTok. We're most active on Instagram. We still have a Twitter account, which we don't even check anymore. We're still around on Facebook, barely. Or sign up for our newsletter at ancienthistoryfangirl.com. Yeah, our newsletters are a great place to get some insight behind the scenes on what we're working on.
But the best place, the best place to find out what we're working on to get extra episodes, ad-free episodes, is our Patreon. Patreon is literally the reason we can still keep doing this work. We can still keep telling these stories. And, you know, I feel really strongly, I don't want to speak for Jenny, that right now we need as many voices as possible telling history, keeping it alive, and bringing the past to light and showing how the past is indeed prologue and effects are present.
So if you want to help us keep doing this work, become a patron at patreon.com slash ancienthistoryfangirl. So usually this is the point where we thank our Patreon subscribers, but we don't have any to thank this month. So if you sign up, perhaps we can thank you next time we record. So thank you all so much for listening and we will see you whenever we see you next.
Hey everyone, it's Jen and Jenny here, and as an extra special treat, we're giving you an excerpt from the audiobook version of Jenny's novel, Enemy of My Dreams, narrated by the superb Lisa Flanagan. This is the infamous tent scene. Well, one of them. There's actually two tent scenes, but the other one's kind of later on and it's a bit spoilery. So I love this scene so much because it's boozy and funny and kind of sexy, and it introduces some of the side characters that I love in this book.
And I also love it because it's Julia trying to persuade Alaric to come over to her side and not give her away for ransom. And it goes awesome. Julia's machinations go just as well as you'd expect. I love that. And Lisa Flanagan does such a good job with this scene. She really makes it come alive. And I just get such a kick out of this scene. So I just had to share it with all of you. I love reading this scene at readings because it's just so entertaining. I mean, I'm entertained. Are you not entertained?
The book and the audiobook and the e-book are all out in stores, and you can find them wherever books are sold. Alaric thrust aside the door flap with one arm, staring with no small measure of astonishment down at the Princess Julia. She was staring up at him, swaying slightly on her feet and looking surprised to see him in his own damn tent. Alaric glanced at Riga, speaking in Gothic. How the hell did she get in here? Mystery to me. I think she's drunk.
That much was certain. There was a fresh scent of wine on the woman's breath, and an unfocused look to her eyes that spoke of something more. Opium, maybe. He switched to her own imperial Latin. "'Hello, Julia.' "'Send your men away, won't you?' She looked at him beseechingly, the pitch-perfect tone of a manipulator in distress. "'What I have to say concerns your ears alone.' Alaric gave her a particularly nasty smile."
No. Clearly, people didn't tell her that very often. Julia's delicate jaw clenched and her eyes lit with temper. Have it your way. I'll say it right here. She raised her chin. You were talking to the wrong child of Theodosius at that banquet. I'm here to give you an empire. If Julia was capable of one thing in this world, it was holding her liquor.
She'd drunk only enough to drown the fear. But now, craning her neck to meet the barbarian king's gaze, she realized too late that it hadn't worked. She was terrified. His eyes slid to her lips and suddenly she was very aware of his nearness, in a way entirely different than fear. You have my attention, Julia. He gave her a mocking smile. He knew exactly the effect he had on her. Damn him!
and crossed the tent, taking a seat in a battered camp chair. At his signal, one of his men brought her a three-legged stool. Sit. She did. What is it you want? So blunt. If I was a man, I would be given all the courtesies. She needed wine of the non-drugged variety. That would calm her nerves. I believe it's customary to offer refreshment to a royal guest before negotiations. So we ought to negotiate now, he said softly.
But to her surprise, he acquiesced. At another of his wordless signals, someone handed him a wineskin. Alaric poured some onto the ground, speaking in Gothic. Then he drank, muscles moving in the golden column of his throat. A tradition among my people, he told her solemnly, offering her the wineskin. We drink to Vodin that he may grant us wise and fruitful conversation. Julia eyed what he offered with trepidation. She'd never drunk to honor a barbarian god.
She wasn't sure such an action was entirely sanitary, but there was a challenge in Alaric's eyes. He didn't think she had the nerve. Julia snatched the wineskin with firm resolve. Wise and fruitful indeed, she said, smiling through her teeth. Then she put the wineskin to her lips and drank deep. Searing fire streaked down her throat. Bloody hell! She managed, bent in half by a fit of gasping coughs.
What in all the toli is this? Ielu, a liquor made from barley. He watched her struggle with cool dispassion. If it is too strong for you, we have water. A pox on your water. She took another swallow. The bright burning line lit up the inside of her throat again. But this time she was ready. The drink was good. The drink was what she needed. Does she know she's supposed to sip it? Riga asked, sitting cross-legged on the floor.
Perhaps we should tell her, Atolf mused, looking not the least inclined to do it. We can't let her drink all of it. That's the last of the batch. Thorismund sounded distinctly irate. If you piss weasels won't stop her, I will. No. Alaric held up a hand. Let her dig her own grave. Whatever she wanted, she seemed intent on making a fool of herself in getting it. Maybe she'd come to seduce him to her cause, he thought.
eyes lazily tracing the fine lines of her collarbones. Maybe he'd let her try. You've had your drink. Custom demanded they pass the skin back and forth between them, taking small sips as offer met with counteroffer. Julia gave no sign she intended to pass it back. Now speak. Her voice dropped low, the affected purr of a gifted seductress. You plan to ransom me, but I have a better proposition. We share the same enemy.
My brother, put me on his throne and you can have any land you want. Point to a place on a map and it's yours. Not a chance. He had been betrayed for the last time by Theodosius and his children. Put you on the throne. Alaric struggled not to laugh. You, she frowned. You laugh because I was born a woman. I laugh because you were born a lapdog.
Perhaps I should let my people bleed and die to raise one of your brother's peacocks to the purple. It makes just as much sense. The look she gave him could freeze fire. They're cockerels. I wonder, he mused lazily, what would drive an emperor's sister to slip me a knife in the middle of a battle and engineer her own kidnapping? You've met my promised husband.
"Olympius," she said coolly. "I loathe the very ground he stands on." She meant it well enough. The venom in her voice was real, so the woman was running away from her engagement. "And what is this to do with me?" "Honorius ordered me to marry him. The only way to argue with Honorius is with an army at my back." She raised her eyes, blue-green and fierce as a cat in a trap. "Your army."
Julia took another hard slug from the wineskin. If she just kept drinking, she could be Cleopatra. "'You will need allies when the time comes,' she informed the barbarian warlord who was currently glaring at her in an intimidating fashion. "'No one knows the snake pit of Roman politics like I do. You cannot hold Rome by force of arms alone. Take it, maybe, but not hold it. Who says I want to hold it? Maybe I just want to see it burn.'
He bared his teeth in a brutal smile. Grow up, woman. What does it matter if you hate your husband? Marriage does not follow love. It never has. You'd be less of a fool to lie on your back as you were made to do. Julia bristled. A searing flush swept across her body, bright heat just beneath the skin. Outrage choked her throat. The nerve. How far down the peninsula do you think you'll get without support from at least some of the people? She snapped.
Not everyone in Rome is happy at my brother's rise. I could lend your next invasion legit- legitimacy. Somehow her tongue got tangled over the word. And beyond that, money. I have a fortune in villas all up and down the coast. All yours, King of the Goths. She let out a hiccup. When had there become two of him? I think I should sit down. Alaric's reply seemed to come from the bottom of a well. Julia barely heard.
Slowly, she slid off the chair and onto the bearskin rug. Alaric watched the princess slide off the stool and list onto the bearskin like a sinking ship. That last pull from the wineskin had been the one that broke her. He could not trust a thing she said, of course. She was a daughter of Theodosius. She'd shred any agreement the moment it suited her. Even so, he wanted her. Even now. You're already sitting. She ignored that.
He knelt beside her and offered her water, which she regarded with scorn. "'I'd be emperor already if I were a man,' she declared accusingly. "'Certainly,' he drawled. "'Drink.' She took the water skin. Up close she smelled of Iolu and sweat, and beneath it the intoxicating scent of roses. She took a sip and grimaced. "'This is water,' he laughed. "'And what else should it be?'
She stared up at him as if just realizing he was there. Eyes green as gemstones one moment, dark blue the next, like the sea over a vast crevasse. "What else do you want from me, King of the Goths?" Her lush red lips curved in a drowsy, knowing smile. Her hand rested boldly on his arm. A scorching burn. He'd put her in the farthest tent from his. He'd been scrupulously careful.
Do you even know what you're offering, Julia? She let the sentence fall away, her mouth a breath from his, begging to be plundered. Fuck it. He could send his men away, then press her back on this bearskin and take what she offered. He would make her sob for him. It would be his own kind of revenge. I believe I shall take a nap, the Princess Julia announced to the room at large, fingers curling in the bearskin.
I am indisposed. You may all come back later. Come back tomorrow. Then she lay down on her side on Alaric's bearskin rug and let out a particularly loud snork. For a breath, quiet reigned in his tent. Well, Riga said cheerfully. Now what? Let's have a bit of fun with her, Thorismund growled. Show her the consequences of drinking the last of a man's batch.
Maybe tie her to a stake outside, Riga said agreeably. Leave her for the beasts. Not one of you touches her. Alaric spoke softly but with a force that shut them up. The edge of her stola rode up her perfect leg, and he took off his cloak to cover her. There was a thin line of drool dangling from her mouth now. Drool. Alaric shook his head in disgust. He didn't even like this woman.
We cannot take her, Atolf said. She's a distraction. Alaric glanced pointedly at Atolf's new lover, the gothic ex-slave with the calculating eyes who had stayed conspicuously quiet. As if you don't have your own distractions. Do you honestly think the Romans will bargain for her? She's defied her own brother. They'll bargain, Alaric said. The boy emperor can't afford to look so weak as to have his kin kidnapped out from under him.
He lifted his eyes to the twins, who had come bursting into the tent just now. He hadn't the patience for whatever elaborate excuse they'd no doubt invented to explain their failure to keep the princess confined. "Take her back to the tent," he ordered them before they could say a word. He would deal with them later. Then he called his men around him and bent over the maps, the plan for their escape already building in his mind.
The youth mental health crisis is growing, and social media is a major driver. Kids are spending up to nine hours a day on screens, often unsupervised, and studies show a direct link to anxiety, depression, and even suicidal thoughts. That's where Gab comes in. Gab offers safe phones and watches with no internet or social media, just the right tech at the right time. From smart watches for young kids to advanced parent-managed phones for teens, Gab keeps kids connected safely.
safely. Visit gab.com slash getgab and use code getgab for a special offer. That's g-a-b-b dot com forward slash getgab. Gab.com.
Tech in steps, independence for them, peace of mind for parents. Hey, it's Paige from Giggly Squad. Real talk, if there's one store that I absolutely love walking around, it's Sephora. It's my total guilty pleasure. They have amazing brands that other people don't have, and I find something great every time I walk in. And there's...
literally one down the street from me so I do that a lot. It's so fun to shop in the store and online and the products are just too good. No regrets ever. For example, one of my favorite beauty brands is Makeup by Mario who just launched his new lip gloss that I absolutely love. So the next time you're in the market for great beauty, shop all the hottest products and brands only at Sephora.