We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode HoP 454 - By Appointment Only - Political Philosophy in the Second Scholastic

HoP 454 - By Appointment Only - Political Philosophy in the Second Scholastic

2024/10/13
logo of podcast History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps

History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
P
Peter Adamson
Topics
Peter Adamson: 本期节目探讨了第二经院哲学,特别是伊比利亚半岛经院哲学家对政治权力的来源和合法性问题的思考。他们关注的核心概念是“dominium”(统治权),并非简单的统治或所有权,而是指对某物的合法控制。莫利纳认为,人类对其自身行为拥有自然统治权,但上帝才是人类身体的主宰。在国际法下,私有财产的引入使得人们可以对他们合法拥有的东西拥有统治权。动物没有权利,因为拥有权利和统治权的前提是能够运用理性。莫利纳将权利定义为积极的,而非消极的,即权利指向的是你控制的特定事物。政治统治权并非自然法的一部分,而是人类设立的产物,即使人类天生具有形成政治共同体的倾向。政治权威是人为的措施,因为人类的堕落导致了对法律的需求;政治权威必须遵守自然法,但允许不同的政府形式存在。政府的合法性取决于人民的同意,而非政府的类型;无论采用何种体制,目标都是相同的:人们服从国家权力是因为这样做是理性的。经院哲学家的政治理论与其因果论之间存在联系:国家的建立在某种意义上是自然的,因为人们有追求共同利益的自然愿望;但在另一种意义上,国家是人为的,是通过理性过程建立的。伊比利亚经院哲学家的理论为霍布斯铺平了道路,但他们的理解更为乐观:人们并非为了逃避自然状态的战争而接受政治统治,而是为了实现共同利益。对伊比利亚经院哲学家而言,政治生活是人类追求建立和繁荣共同体的理性表达和手段,而非权宜之计。经院哲学家认为婚姻在某种意义上是政治的,涉及正义关系;婚姻源于亚当和夏娃,即使没有罪恶,人类也会追求某种形式的共同体。经院哲学家对婚姻的论述中,女性的地位出奇地平等,尽管他们也认为妻子应该服从丈夫;共同体比生育在他们对婚姻的理解中更为核心。根据桑切斯的观点,婚姻并非天生永久的;基督教信仰中的婚姻永久性是效仿基督与教会之间不可破裂的联系,而非自然理性。苏亚雷斯认为,即使人类理性认识到国家对保障公共福利的必要性,人民仍然需要自愿决定建立国家。在苏亚雷斯的社会契约理论中,人民通过建立政治安排,创造了先前不存在的秩序和统一;只有在此之后,才能谈论“共同体”。苏亚雷斯理论中的社会契约似乎是虚构的,难以想象所有的人类在现代通讯技术出现之前就达成了任何默契。关于政治权威的来源存在一个先有鸡还是先有蛋的问题:共同体需要有权力才能形成统一的共同体,但只有在成为统一的共同体之后才能拥有和行使这种权力。维多利亚和莫利纳认为,人类天生就拥有对其自身(更具体地说,对自身身体和自由)的权威,并可以将这种权力转移给统治者;奴隶制是不自然的。苏亚雷斯试图调和人类天生拥有权威和政治统治只能通过自愿选择建立的观点。苏亚雷斯认为,权力最初存在于人民之中,但上帝的行动与人民的决定相结合,才能将一群个体转变为一个适当的政治联盟。萨拉斯批评苏亚雷斯的观点,认为如果个体的人民没有足够的权力来形成共同体,那么上帝必须增加必要的权力,这破坏了政治统治的自愿性和契约性。另一种对苏亚雷斯观点的解读是,自愿的同意行为能够创造新的权力,如同许诺或宣誓一样。在苏亚雷斯的观点中,所有的政治权威最初都是民主的,因为人民首先将自己构成一个拥有自治权的集体;理想情况下,他们不会保持民主,而是选择任命君主。苏亚雷斯的理论预示了霍布斯和其他早期现代社会契约理论家,但也具有其时代特征,体现了耶稣会精神。加入耶稣会类似于签订社会契约,成员自愿服从等级制度,追求共同利益和上帝的荣耀;同意理论也适合天主教知识分子。苏亚雷斯的政治哲学部分是为了反驳新教的观点,即他们的统治者是由上帝派遣来捍卫和传播宗教改革的;天主教坚持世俗统治者并非由上帝任命,而是由人民意志决定,这与教皇的权力形成对比。16世纪的宗教争论促进了重要的思想突破,一些思想的出现往往被错误地认为是在一个世纪或更久之后才出现的。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

What is the concept of dominium in the Iberian Scholastics' political philosophy?

Dominium refers to lawful control over something, where the dominus is the lawful controller. It applies to both personal actions and private property, which are governed by the law of nations.

How do the Iberian Scholastics define a right?

A right is defined as a capacity to do something, obtain something, or demand it. It is positively directed at something particular under one's control, not merely the absence of legal prohibition.

Why do humans need political authority according to the Iberian Scholastics?

Political authority is needed because humans are not perfectly good and require laws to ensure the common welfare. It is an artificial measure introduced due to the fall from grace.

What is the role of consent in the Iberian Scholastics' view of political authority?

Consent of the people is crucial for the legitimacy of a government, regardless of its form. It is through voluntary decision that people create an order and unity among themselves, forming a commonwealth.

How do the Iberian Scholastics compare their political theory to Hobbes' view?

While both acknowledge the need for political authority to escape a state of nature, the Scholastics view political life as a natural expression of human aspiration for community, unlike Hobbes' more pessimistic view of it as the lesser of two evils.

What is the role of marriage in the Iberian Scholastics' political philosophy?

Marriage is seen as a political alliance involving justice and mutual aid, reflecting the natural desire for community. It is considered a perfect society created through voluntary cooperation.

How does Suárez explain the origin of political authority?

Suárez suggests that authority resides originally in the people, who then voluntarily decide to form a commonwealth. Divine action cooperates with human decision to create a proper political union.

What is the significance of the social contract in Suárez's political theory?

The social contract represents the voluntary act of people coming together to form a commonwealth, creating the power to govern themselves, which they can then transfer to a sovereign or retain for democratic self-governance.

How does Suárez's political theory relate to the society of Jesuits?

Suárez's theory mirrors the structure of the Jesuit order, where individuals voluntarily choose to join and submit to an authoritative hierarchy, striving for the good of all and the glory of God.

Why did Catholic intellectuals embrace the consent theory of political authority?

Catholic intellectuals, like Suárez, emphasized the voluntary nature of political authority to distinguish it from the divine dispensation of the Pope's power, countering Protestant claims about the legitimacy of Catholic monarchs.

Chapters
This chapter explores the Iberian Scholastics' theories on political power, focusing on the concept of dominium and its connection to rights and ownership. It discusses the scholastic view of the origin of political authority, its relationship to natural law, and different forms of government.
  • Scholastics viewed dominium as lawful control, extending to actions and possessions.
  • Political dominion is artificial, arising from human decisions, not natural law.
  • Consent of the people, not government type, legitimizes rule.
  • Scholastic views on marriage highlight community over procreation, with surprisingly egalitarian aspects.

Shownotes Transcript

Suárez and other Iberian scholastics ask where political power comes from and under what circumstances it is exercised legitimately.