We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Frederick Crews, "Freud: The Making of an Illusion" (Picador, 2018)

Frederick Crews, "Freud: The Making of an Illusion" (Picador, 2018)

2024/12/31
logo of podcast New Books in Critical Theory

New Books in Critical Theory

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
F
Frederick Crews
Topics
Frederick Crews: 弗洛伊德的生平和著作中存在大量与所谓的“弗洛伊德传奇”相悖的事实。标准传记都受到该传奇的影响而失真。通过对弗洛伊德写给未婚妻玛莎·伯奈斯的1500多封信件的研究,我们可以看到一个与传统认知大相径庭的弗洛伊德形象。他并非一个坚持科学真理、不畏艰难的学者,而是对金钱极其渴望、机会主义、通奸且不关心他人的人。弗洛伊德对可卡因的依赖和使用对其生平和思想产生了重大影响。 弗洛伊德早期对传统的追求与晚年极度自负的转变,需要通过研究其发展阶段来解释,而非仅仅关注其20世纪的著作。他早期渴望获得认可,而晚年则沉浸于自身伟大科学家的形象中。对俄狄浦斯情结的强调是其思想转变的关键。 书中对弗洛伊德的贪婪、投机、通奸和贪财等负面评价并非主观判断,而是基于事实和其同时代人的评价。例如,弗洛伊德本人曾说金钱对他来说是笑气,他的妻子也批评他过于痴迷于金钱。 学术研究与心理治疗在检验理论方面存在根本区别。学术研究需要独立的视角和可检验的假设,而心理治疗更关注疗效而非理论的证实。精神分析学理论概念模糊,难以检验,其疗效也难以客观评估。神经精神分析学试图将神经科学与精神分析学结合,但这并非科学研究的正确方法,因为它预设了精神分析学的正确性。 精神动力学观点认为人的思想存在内在冲突,但这与达尔文进化论的观点相悖,也与对人脑的认知不相符。 作者认为,对弗洛伊德及其理论的批判并非出于愤怒,而是基于冷静的分析。他希望与读者进行对话,并鼓励读者以开放的心态阅读他的著作。 Cassandra Saltman: 作为访谈者,Cassandra Saltman主要负责引导话题,提出问题,并对Frederick Crews的观点进行回应和补充。她对Crews的研究方法、观点以及对精神分析学未来的看法都进行了深入的探讨。她的提问促使Crews进一步阐述了他的观点,并对一些关键问题进行了更详细的解释。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why did Frederick Crews decide to return to writing about Freud after 27 years?

Frederick Crews returned to writing about Freud after 27 years because a friend in Holland, Han Israels, asked him to help adapt a book about Freud. Crews got excited about the project and continued working on it, even after his friend backed out.

Why did Crews focus on Freud's engagement letters to Martha Bernays in his research?

Crews focused on Freud's engagement letters to Martha Bernays because they provided a wealth of information not previously available to the public. These letters, released in 2000, offered a different and more revealing picture of Freud's personality and early life.

Why does Crews argue that the standard Freud legend is a 'complete fable'?

Crews argues that the standard Freud legend is a 'complete fable' because it portrays Freud as a rigorous scientist facing uniform opposition, which is contradicted by historical facts. The legend, created by Freud himself, omits his opportunistic and controversial actions, such as his involvement with cocaine.

Why did Crews stop his narrative of Freud's life at 1905?

Crews stopped his narrative of Freud's life at 1905 to focus on the formative years that led to the development of psychoanalysis. He wanted to understand how a conventional young man became a self-proclaimed world-shaking scientist, rather than analyzing his later fame.

Why does Crews emphasize the importance of an 'empirical attitude' in testing ideas?

Crews emphasizes the importance of an 'empirical attitude' in testing ideas because it ensures that hypotheses are rigorously evaluated against alternatives, leading to the abandonment of incorrect theories. This approach is essential for scientific progress and distinguishes it from the self-validating nature of psychotherapy.

Why does Crews criticize the field of neuropsychoanalysis?

Crews criticizes neuropsychoanalysis because it seeks to find points of convergence between psychoanalysis and neuroscience, rather than conducting rigorous, independent testing. This approach is seen as a cosmetic addition to psychoanalytic lore and does not align with the scientific method.

Why does Crews reject the idea of a 'sunnier model of the psyche'?

Crews rejects the idea of a 'sunnier model of the psyche' because he prioritizes truth and factual accuracy over positivity. He believes that any model of the mind should be based on empirical evidence rather than a desire for a more optimistic view.

What does Crews suggest should happen to psychoanalysis if it is recognized as a pseudoscience?

Crews suggests that if psychoanalysis is recognized as a pseudoscience, it should gradually accommodate itself to common sense and empirical evidence. However, he does not prescribe a specific course of action and leaves it to psychoanalysts to decide their own future.

Why did Crews initially become a Freudian and later reject Freudian theory?

Crews initially became a Freudian in the 1960s because it was fashionable among literary intellectuals. He later rejected Freudian theory after encountering significant criticisms and realizing that many of its concepts were not empirically testable.

What is Crews' current project, and why is it important to him?

Crews' current project is to help get an innocent man out of prison. He believes that the man was wrongly convicted based on flawed ideas and is working to prove his innocence. This project is important to him because it aligns with his commitment to justice and truth.

Chapters
This chapter explores the author's motivation for revisiting Freud's work after a long hiatus, focusing on the discovery of previously unseen engagement letters between Freud and Martha Bernays, which offer a new perspective on Freud's personality. The letters, largely epistolary due to geographical distance, provide a wealth of information not found in previously published works.
  • Revisiting Freud's work after 27 years
  • Discovery of Freud's engagement letters to Martha Bernays
  • Letters provide a different picture of Freud than previously known

Shownotes Transcript

The figure of Sigmund Freud has captivated the Western imagination like few others. One hundred and twenty-five years after the publication of Studies on Hysteria, the good doctor from Vienna continues to stir controversy in institutions, academic circles, and nuclear households across the world. 

Perhaps Freud’s sharpest and most adamant critic, Frederick Crews has been debating Freud’s legacy for over thirty years. His latest work, *Freud: The Making of an Illusion *)(Picador, 2018) challenges us with an extensive psychological profile of the legend here revealed as scam artist. What some analysts might argue to be a 750 page character assassination, Crews maintains is simply a recitation of facts which leaves readers to draw their own conclusions. One might wonder if the story of facts that is conveyed is not itself a counter myth.

Was Freud a megalomaniacal, greedy, cocaine-addled opportunist and psychoanalysis a pseudoscience that has reigned tyrannically over twentieth century thought? Making use of Freud’s extensive letters to Martha Bernays, Crews paints a “damning portrait” (Esquire) of a money hungry, adulterous, and uncaring man. 

How can this portrait be reconciled with the radically meaningful and deeply transformative process many of us know psychoanalysis to be? Is the tyranny of rationality preferable to the tyranny of myth? Does the unmaking of the myth of the man undo the gift of his work?

In this interview Crews responds to questions of what it means to have an empirical attitude, how we should “test” the process of healing, what’s so tempting about Freud, and what should become of psychoanalysis today. Meticulously researched, the Crews of the Freud wars is back again, and he’s going in for the kill shot.

*Cassandra B. Seltman is a writer, psychoanalyst, and researcher in NYC. *[email protected])

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)

Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory)