Frederick Crews returned to writing about Freud after 27 years because a friend in Holland, Han Israels, asked him to help adapt a book about Freud. Crews got excited about the project and continued working on it, even after his friend backed out.
Crews focused on Freud's engagement letters to Martha Bernays because they provided a wealth of information not previously available to the public. These letters, released in 2000, offered a different and more revealing picture of Freud's personality and early life.
Crews argues that the standard Freud legend is a 'complete fable' because it portrays Freud as a rigorous scientist facing uniform opposition, which is contradicted by historical facts. The legend, created by Freud himself, omits his opportunistic and controversial actions, such as his involvement with cocaine.
Crews stopped his narrative of Freud's life at 1905 to focus on the formative years that led to the development of psychoanalysis. He wanted to understand how a conventional young man became a self-proclaimed world-shaking scientist, rather than analyzing his later fame.
Crews emphasizes the importance of an 'empirical attitude' in testing ideas because it ensures that hypotheses are rigorously evaluated against alternatives, leading to the abandonment of incorrect theories. This approach is essential for scientific progress and distinguishes it from the self-validating nature of psychotherapy.
Crews criticizes neuropsychoanalysis because it seeks to find points of convergence between psychoanalysis and neuroscience, rather than conducting rigorous, independent testing. This approach is seen as a cosmetic addition to psychoanalytic lore and does not align with the scientific method.
Crews rejects the idea of a 'sunnier model of the psyche' because he prioritizes truth and factual accuracy over positivity. He believes that any model of the mind should be based on empirical evidence rather than a desire for a more optimistic view.
Crews suggests that if psychoanalysis is recognized as a pseudoscience, it should gradually accommodate itself to common sense and empirical evidence. However, he does not prescribe a specific course of action and leaves it to psychoanalysts to decide their own future.
Crews initially became a Freudian in the 1960s because it was fashionable among literary intellectuals. He later rejected Freudian theory after encountering significant criticisms and realizing that many of its concepts were not empirically testable.
Crews' current project is to help get an innocent man out of prison. He believes that the man was wrongly convicted based on flawed ideas and is working to prove his innocence. This project is important to him because it aligns with his commitment to justice and truth.
The figure of Sigmund Freud has captivated the Western imagination like few others. One hundred and twenty-five years after the publication of Studies on Hysteria, the good doctor from Vienna continues to stir controversy in institutions, academic circles, and nuclear households across the world.
Perhaps Freud’s sharpest and most adamant critic, Frederick Crews has been debating Freud’s legacy for over thirty years. His latest work, *Freud: The Making of an Illusion *)(Picador, 2018) challenges us with an extensive psychological profile of the legend here revealed as scam artist. What some analysts might argue to be a 750 page character assassination, Crews maintains is simply a recitation of facts which leaves readers to draw their own conclusions. One might wonder if the story of facts that is conveyed is not itself a counter myth.
Was Freud a megalomaniacal, greedy, cocaine-addled opportunist and psychoanalysis a pseudoscience that has reigned tyrannically over twentieth century thought? Making use of Freud’s extensive letters to Martha Bernays, Crews paints a “damning portrait” (Esquire) of a money hungry, adulterous, and uncaring man.
How can this portrait be reconciled with the radically meaningful and deeply transformative process many of us know psychoanalysis to be? Is the tyranny of rationality preferable to the tyranny of myth? Does the unmaking of the myth of the man undo the gift of his work?
In this interview Crews responds to questions of what it means to have an empirical attitude, how we should “test” the process of healing, what’s so tempting about Freud, and what should become of psychoanalysis today. Meticulously researched, the Crews of the Freud wars is back again, and he’s going in for the kill shot.
*Cassandra B. Seltman is a writer, psychoanalyst, and researcher in NYC. *[email protected])
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory)