The colonists protested the Tea Act and Coercive Acts because they viewed them as oppressive measures by Parliament. The Tea Act of 1773, while making tea cheaper, was seen as a way to enforce taxation without representation. The Coercive Acts, passed in response to the Boston Tea Party, closed the port of Boston and restricted colonial self-governance, leading to fears that similar harsh penalties could be imposed on other colonies.
By 1773, early Americans consumed nearly three-quarters of a pound of tea per person annually. Tea symbolized British identity and participation in the British Empire's consumer culture. It was a way for colonists to feel connected to Britain, as they consumed the same goods as their counterparts in Britain, Ireland, and Scotland.
Smuggling was widespread in the tea trade, with a significant portion of tea consumed in Britain and its colonies being smuggled. The Navigation Acts attempted to regulate trade, but they were often ignored. Smuggling allowed colonists to bypass taxes and access cheaper tea, which was a common practice even in Britain, where most tea was smuggled.
The Tea Act of 1773 had two main elements: it renewed a tax cut from the Townshend Acts to make legally imported tea competitive with smuggled tea, and it allowed the East India Company to ship tea directly to the colonies without auctioning it in London. This bypassed middlemen, reducing costs but also angering colonial merchants who felt excluded from the trade.
The Boston Tea Party and other tea protests politicized tea, turning it into a symbol of resistance against British taxation and oppression. These acts of defiance, particularly the destruction of tea in Boston, unified colonists against British policies and led to the Coercive Acts, which further galvanized colonial opposition and set the stage for the American Revolution.
The Continental Association, established by the First Continental Congress in 1774, was a boycott of British goods, including tea, to protest the Coercive Acts. While it created a sense of unity and common cause among the colonies, it was not entirely effective. Many colonists continued to consume tea and other British goods, and the boycott's economic impact was limited due to the colonies' smaller population compared to Britain.
With the outbreak of the American War for Independence in April 1775, the focus shifted from consumer politics, such as boycotts, to the politics of revolution and war. The symbolic meaning of tea and other consumer goods diminished as the conflict escalated, and the practicalities of warfare took precedence over symbolic acts of resistance.
The Boston Tea Party played a significant role in shaping historical memory by becoming a symbol of colonial resistance to British oppression. However, much of the popular narrative, such as the destruction of all tea and the monopolization of tea sales by consignees, was exaggerated or false. Bostonians, in particular, shaped the story to emphasize their role in the resistance, while other colonies had different responses to the tea crisis.
During the early days of the American Revolution, British Americans attempted to sway their fellow Britons with consumer politics.
In 1768 and 1769, they organized a non-consumption movement of British goods to protest the Townshend Duties. In 1774, they arranged a non-importation and non-exportation movement to protest the Tea Act and Coercive Acts.
Why did the colonists protest the Tea Act and Coercive Acts? Why did they chose to protest those acts with the consumer politics of a non-importation/non-exportation program?
James Fichter), the author of Tea: Consumption, Politics, and Revolution, 1773-1776), joins us to explore the Tea Crisis of 1773 and the resulting non-importation/non-exportation movement the colonists organized after Parliament passed the Coercive Acts.
Show Notes: https://www.benfranklinsworld.com/401) Sponsor Links
Complementary Episodes
Episode 112: The Tea Crisis of 1773) Episode 160: The Politics of Tea) Episode 228: The Boston Massacre) Episode 229: The Townshend Moment) Episode 296: The Boston Massacre: A Family History) Episode 337: Early America’s Trade with China) Episode 375: Misinformation Nation) Episode 390: The Objects of Revolution)
Listen!
Helpful Links