They hadn't seen Gladiator since its release in 2000 and wanted to reassess their initial negative impressions, suspecting they might have been overly critical at the time.
The Latin in Gladiator was poorly executed, with grammatical errors and anachronistic phrases, which the hosts found humorous and indicative of a lack of care for historical accuracy.
Ridley Scott is known for creating visually beautiful films, but his lack of attention to scripts often results in inconsistent quality. Gladiator 1, for example, had significant improvised elements and a weak script.
The plot of Gladiator 2 was described as incomprehensible and nonsensical, making the original Gladiator's plot seem coherent in comparison.
In the film, Caracalla was depicted as a small, weak, and syphilitic figure who was easily manipulated by his brother. Historically, Caracalla was a strong, burly man known for his aggressive behavior and military prowess.
Denzel Washington played a significant role in Gladiator 2, and his performance was widely praised as the best element of the film, bringing energy and authenticity to the otherwise flawed production.
Paul Mescal was seen as unconvincing in his role, lacking the anger and intensity expected of a gladiator, and instead coming across as earnest and somewhat passive.
A taster of our first ever bonus episode, a film review show about two roman-inspired films.
Full episode only available on Patreon: www.patreon.com/historyissexy