The Truth About Alice in Wonderland
40:30 Share

Hi, I'm your host, Kate Lister. If you would like Betwixt the Sheets ad-free and get early access, sign up to History Hit. With a History Hit subscription, you can also watch hundreds of original documentaries with top history presenters and enjoy a new release every single week. Sign up now by visiting historyhit.com forward slash subscribe.

Nordstrom brings you the season's most wanted brands. Skims, Mango, Free People, and Princess Polly, all under $100. From trending sneakers to beauty must-haves, we've curated the styles you'll wear on repeat this spring. Free shipping, free returns, and in-store pickup make it easier than ever. Shop now in stores and at nordstrom.com.

I used to think buying foundation online was impossible. How am I supposed to find my shade when I can't even get it right in store? Then I discovered Il Makiage. I took their AI-powered quiz to find my custom match, and wow, this foundation is literally my skin in a bottle. The undertone and coverage are spot on. It's so neutral and weightless, I can't even tell I'm wearing makeup.

Plus, with Try Before You Buy, you can try your full size at home for 14 days. Take the Power Match Quiz now at ilmakiage.com slash quiz. I-L-M-A-K-I-A-G-E dot com slash quiz. They

They say opposites attract. That's why the Sleep Number Smart Bed is the best bed for couples. You can each choose what's right for you, whenever you like. You like a bed that feels firm, but they want soft? Sleep Number does that. You want to sleep cooler, while they like to feel warm? Sleep Number does that too. Why choose a Sleep Number Smart Bed? So you can choose your ideal comfort on either side. Sleep Number Smart Beds start at $999.

Prices higher in Alaska and Hawaii. Exclusively at a Sleep Number store near you. See store or sleepnumber.com for details. Hello, my lovely Bertwixtas. It's me, Kate Lester. You are listening to Bertwixta Sheets. But before we can go any further, I do have to tell you, this is an adult podcast spoken by adults to other adults about adult things in an adult way covering a range of subjects and you should be an adult too. Now, you know, I normally mess around with what we call the fair do's warning because fair do's, we did warn you.

But this is actually quite a serious fair dues warning. This episode is covering allegations of child abuse and indecent images of children. So you might just not want to listen to that today. And in which case, do feel free to scroll back through our back catalogue and we will catch you next time. A golden afternoon in 1862, a rowing boat meanders steadily up river, making its way through the bells and chatter of Oxford.

Aboard there are two grown men and three young girls fidgeting in the warm sun. Heavy picnic baskets are weighing the boat down in the water and the girls' small hands regularly slip from the oars.

One of the men in the boat is reclined, eyes closed as he conjures up a new world for his young companions. With frequent interruptions and the odd childish squeal of delight, the world of Underground, later to be known as Wonderland, is formed and young Alice is placed squarely in the middle of it.

What do you look for in a man? Oh, money, of course. You're supposed to rise when an adult speaks to you. I make perfect copies of whatever my boss needs by just turning it up and pushing the button. Yes, social courtesy does make a difference. Goodness, what beautiful dance. Goodness has nothing to do with it, Jerry. Oh.

Hello and welcome back to Betwixt the Sheets, the history of sex scandal and society with me, Kate Lister. It's rare to find somebody who has never met Alice. Whether they met her in Tim Burton's 2010 movie, the 1951 Disney classic or in the books themselves, it's almost certain that you would have met Alice somewhere.

Long blonde hair held back with an Alice band, big eyes and rosy cheeks, a blue dress with puffed sleeves and a white pinafore. She could often be found chasing anthropomorphic white rabbits down rabbit holes and having tea parties with mad hatters. But where did she come from?

In this episode of Betwixt the Sheets, we are going back to that boat in Oxford to find out more about the author Lewis Carroll, whose real name was Charles Ludwig Dodson, and in particular, his relationship with the real life Alice. Joining me today to tease apart this very complex story is Will Brooker, Professor of Film and Cultural Studies at Kingston University. So let's crack on.

Hello, and welcome to Betwixt the Sheets. It's only Will Brooker. How are you doing? I'm doing so well, thank you, Kate. Very nice of you to have me on. Oh, I mean, how could we not have had you on for this particular subject? Are you ready to ruin a few childhoods? I hope to preserve and cherish a few childhoods, actually. I think we'll come out of it. Well, I don't want to spoil anything. Right, this is interesting.

We are in controversial territory with, well, whenever you've got an author that is as cherished as Lewis Carroll is, and especially if it's to do with childhood stuff, they become quite sacred. But,

But can I ask you before we even get into discussing who this man was and what the controversy may or may not have been? Do you remember when you first read or saw Alice in Wonderland, what your first contact with it was? I sure do. And it's quite precious to me. So, I mean, we have to accept I might be biased. My mum gave me her copy of it. In fact, I think she first gave me her copy of Through the Looking Glass rather than Alice in Wonderland. It was when I was seven.

which is the approximate age of Alice in the books. And it said, William Brooker, your turn now.

And as my mum has now passed, it's even more special to me, you know, in her handwriting on the Fontys piece. So she was handing it on like a, well, she's handing on her own childhood copy. So, yeah, really special for me. Why do you think that text is as precious as it is in the whole canon of children's literature? Well, I mean, we must know I read the sequel first.

first, which is kind of odd. That's my mum's fault. It's kind of funny to give someone the sequel first. So Through Looking Glass has always been my favourite of the two. And I think it's quite a lot of critics' favourite because it's more considered and intentional and it's kind of more sophisticated. It's more planned, basically. I do wonder sometimes...

how important Alice in Wonderland is still to kids and to modern culture. I've got a six-year-old. I don't think he knows who she is. And I wonder if most people would know her through Disney or Tim Burton. But for a long time, during Carol's lifetime, the book was certainly cherished as a kind of a childhood favourite. After he had died in World War I, it became sort of symbolic of a lost childhood, a lost period, a period of lost innocence.

And between the wars, it still symbolised something which was recently passed and now lost. And then, not each decade, but each sort of major cultural period, I think, has had its own Alice, like Freudian Alice, psychedelic Alice. The 2000s, which is what I... Well, the 90s, actually, and 2000s, which I was writing about when I last significantly wrote on Alice. That was when these discourses around protecting children and paedophiles came into play.

I think one of the reasons why it did become such a big text is if you try and place it within the context of Victorian literature, it was sort of one of the first, if not the first, children's texts to just be an explosion of imagination and nonsense. Up to then, children's literature had been very much sit down, sit up straight and say your prayers. Yeah, it was irreverent.

very irreverent, which is funny because he was a reverend, Dodgson, Carroll, but it was irreverent. So maybe Dodgson was a reverend and Carroll was irreverent. It's got his parodic sermons and moral rhymes in it. So it was actively subverting what children are normally told to do. Yeah. And I think part of the lasting appeal, I think, is that it's about a child's perspective on adult life and adult society.

Whatever other interpretations we put on it, it's about how strange, sometimes oppressive and complicated and unfair adult society with its rules seem to a kid. And if kids do connect with it now, then I think that could be the meaning they're taking from it. Let's talk about the man himself. So Lewis Carroll is a pen name. What is his real name and what's his origin story? His name is Charles Litwidge Dodson.

Now, I've learned from all my friends in the Corollian societies that it's not Dodgson, but Dodson. Dodson, okay. Yeah, and Charles Lutwidge became sort of reversed...

and I think de-Latinized into Lewis Carroll. So Charles Litwidge was sort of reversed and then adapted and translated a little bit. So that's a sort of rather labored joke. I was going to say, but all accounts and then try and summarize them, but actually all accounts are so different. And I think that's part of the trouble with Carroll. There's lots of different sides to him and there's not a lot that's really known about him personally. We know the facts of his life,

He grew up with several sisters. He was producing sort of doki pamphlets for the family from a young age, pretty much lived his life Oxford in the same rooms there, lecturing mathematics, wrote books about logic.

and also wrote these two incredible Alice books. And The Hunting of the Snark, which happens in what we would now call the same sort of universe, you know, the Alice universe or whatever. I quite like the fact that you've got sort of crossover monsters between the two. They're clearly in the same environment. And then later works, which are supposedly for children. I've never liked them. Sylvie and Bruno, two massive volumes of that. For me, sort of turgid.

sentimental, twee, just don't work at all. Some people like them more than I do. To me, he never really produced anything as good as the Alice books and The Hunting of the Snarkers, an interesting sort of... It's a long poem about what the title says, hunting a mythical beast. Very unusual for this man to have done it as well, because I remember...

reading all of these essays and I've endlessly heard people say, oh God, he was off his tits on LSD. He must have been because Alice became really important to the psychedelic 60s movement as well. But from what I know of him, he was really quite dull and awkward. He was a mathematician. He was in the church. He didn't really like talking to people. Most of the descriptions I've heard of him was that he was awkward.

Yeah, about the psychedelic thing, I think that's an example of people having the Alice and the Carol that they want for their own period. Because from inner culture in the 1960s where people are doing LSD and mushrooms, a book with a chapter where there's a caterpillar telling you to eat this bit of the mushroom and you'll grow big and small, it's in the Grace Slick song, White Rabbit.

And also stoners would project the Disney movie on campus and, you know, do their thing with it, their substances. And they were absolutely convinced that it was a stoner movie, but you know, not necessarily. That's like seeing it through the framework of the time, isn't it? I,

I think it's pretty definite he didn't do any LSD, although the whole culture around drugs was different then, wasn't it? Opium was more widely available. I'm pretty convinced he didn't. He was a pretty abstemious even drinker. You know, he'd have like a glass of sherry. Actually, I personally think, I think it's a little bit limiting to think that he must have been on drugs to imagine all this stuff.

Because I think it is also possible to have that imagination without being stoned, you know. And also a lot of people get stoned and never write incredible works of literature. So I think it was him rather than anything he was imbibing and ingesting. Some people say that this whole image of him as being dull is also another myth. And he was socially active, socially confident, big in the world of theatre.

like to hang around people of higher ranks, like he liked to get access to royalty and to actors, and that he was a bit of a social mover. So it's funny, isn't it? There's all these myths around him. Yeah. Really contradictory stuff as well. What's your thoughts from someone that's researched him? Do you think that he was quiet and bookish and into his maths? What do you think about him?

I tell you what, I think people contain multitudes, you know, and I think someone could probably look at you or me in different lights asking different people and say, well, you know, I knew the person like this. I think it's quite possible that someone could be all those things at different times in different company with different groups, actually, because, you know, the way you might act with a child you meet on the beach, which he did, and this is partly what, you know, while we now have problems with him, he was very friendly with children that he'd only just met.

It's bound to be different from talking to actors backstage at a theatre. And the way you lecture to a class is going to be different from the way you have a laugh with your friends.

So I think we might just have to accept that some things escape easy definitions, especially because we're not really held by the fact his diaries, firstly, they're really boring. And secondly, some have been destroyed and some have been tampered with, which is partly what leads to this controversy that there are missing bits. And so that helps with the...

the mystery of Lewis Carroll, why would his relatives have destroyed anything? How did the Alice books come about then? We should talk about that. We've got this man who, he's in the church. I can't remember, he wasn't very high up in the church, but he was also a mathematician at Oxford.

Oxford, is that right? Yeah, mathematician, yeah. Where the hell does Alice come from? Well, there's sort of myths around that as well, and we can't know for sure what the facts were of the actual original occasion because it's been kind of retroactively made into the origin story of Alice in Wonderland, this so-called golden afternoon. But basically what happened is...

He and his friend Reverend Duckworth used to socialise with, take the daughters of the Liddell family, the nearby Liddell family,

out on trips and everything. And they had many such trips, nothing much else to do, I suppose. Play in the meadows, go up the Isis, which apparently is what the Thames is called when it goes through Oxford, go up the Isis on a boat and so on. And on one of these trips, as he often did, he would tell the girls stories off the top of his head. And supposedly the story he told on this particular day was an especially good one. And the girls clamoured for him to write it down.

So he went home and in his quarters, you know, he wrote this one down. And Alice was his favourite of the Liddell sisters, Alice. So it starts off as being kind of a story about

Just like you might have a kid and make up stories about them, and then you develop that into a Henry and the Monsters or something, whatever. And then when he shows it to other people and they say, "Oh, Charles, my dear Dodson, there's something in this. This could be a success." Then he elaborates it and makes it cleverer, makes it much longer. Originally had his own illustrations, which clearly show someone who looks a bit like Alice Liddell, who's like a brunette with a bob.

He expands it and he gets John Tenniel, a really good artist who drew for Punch magazine.

to illustrate it. And I think by the time it's published in 1865, a few years later, it's kind of gone quite a long way from the original Alice, partly because Tenniel draws her with long blonde hair. I think that's quite key somehow, that Dodson never said, Carol Dodson, never said, no, no, you've got to make her look like this girl. I think he was actually quite concerned there with commercial success. He was a pretty canny guy. He was in charge of merchandising for...

Alice in Wonderland. He was pretty possessive with the whole sort of what we would now call the brand. I think by the time it was published, actually, it wasn't really about the little girl so much anymore, partly because years had passed and as girls grew older, it was less possible to kind of socialise with them because, you know, as they entered their teens, it wouldn't have been proper. So it starts out, I would say, a story about his favourite little girl from this family told to her and her sisters on what supposedly is like an idyllic

golden afternoon, this mythical boat ride. There's been lots of debate about whether it was actually raining that day and what really happened and so on. But it's important to sort of myth that it's this perfect, perfect afternoon. And it's important that this one story was the best story which he then wrote down. But I think we should remember that the original story isn't the one that was published. That one, you can get it, is called Alice's Adventures Underground. You can see it in his handwriting with his pictures, but that's not the story that was actually published.

There is a lot about Alice and her sisters in the finished text, though, isn't it? Like their cat really was called Diner. And isn't there a poem on the final page that if you read through the first letter of each line, it spells out Alice's name? Alice Pleasance Liddle. Yeah, a nice name. Yeah, the sisters do...

crop up in it and in disguised form in the i believe it's the door mouse who tells a story about three girls who lived in a treacle well elsie lacey and tilly and those are clearly the sisters the lorry bird is like based on what based on you know it's kind of inspired by lorena alice's older sister so there's these there's these little sort of in jokes

but they're quite hidden now. It's not really about Alice and her sisters. You know, really it's about this character called Alice who then appears again in the sequel. And by the time she appears in the sequel, that's 1871, and Lewis Carroll was not really in touch with Alice Little anymore. And there's one key fact that I think is quite interesting.

Whatever we think about whether John Tenniel drew a blonde girl, because this blonde girl that he drew as Alice had appeared in some other of his pictures for Punch. It was like one of his kind of characters, you know, this sort of little miss, prim little miss. In through the looking glass, I like this because it can't really be argued, in through the looking glass, Alice leans out of a boat.

in a river again and her hair touches the water and the original Alice's hair would not have touched the water so to me that strongly suggests at that point he was thinking about the girl in the pictures not the actual girl I think she had evolved from as his character his kind of brand his considerable literary success by that point I'll be back with Will and Alice after this short break Strap in You're in the race with F1 TV Premium

See what the race director sees with custom multi-view. Watch every jaw-dropping moment in live 4K UHD across up to six screens uninterrupted. Experience ultimate live immersion with F1 TV Premium. Available on selected devices.

I used to think buying foundation online was impossible. How am I supposed to find my shade when I can't even get it right in store? Then I discovered Il Makiage. I took their AI-powered quiz to find my custom match, and wow, this foundation is literally my skin in a bottle. The undertone and coverage are spot on. It's so neutral and weightless, I can't even tell I'm wearing makeup.

Plus, with Try Before You Buy, you can try your full size at home for 14 days. Take the Power Match Quiz now at ilmakiage.com slash quiz. I-L-M-A-K-I-A-G-E dot com slash quiz. I'm Josie Santee, health coach, wellness editor, and host of the Every Girl podcast.

where we cut through the noise with realistic, expert-backed advice to help you thrive in every category of life while still loving the person that you already are. And part of loving yourself is being really authentic to you, including the clothes you wear.

In partnership with Nordstrom, we're helping you update your spring wardrobe so your style is fit for your best self. Nordstrom brings you the season's most wanted brands like Skims, Mango, Free People, and Princess Polly, all under $100. From trending sneakers to beauty must-haves, we've curated the styles that you'll wear on repeat this spring. Free shipping, free returns, and in-store pickup make it easier than ever. Show

Shop now in stores and at Nordstrom.com.

Sleep Number does that. You want to sleep cooler while they like to feel warm? Sleep Number does that too. Why choose a Sleep Number smart bed? So you can choose your ideal comfort on either side. Sleep Number smart beds start at $999. Prices higher in Alaska and Hawaii. Exclusively at a Sleep Number store near you. See store or sleepnumber.com for details.

So there's this mythical story that may or may not have happened where he tells this story and they're all punting down the River Thames, but it's not the Thames because it's in Oxford. And Alice was seven and she has two sisters, right? Yes, Edith and Lorena, the younger Edith and the older Lorena. So we're going to have to talk about the Liddell family then, because this is where some of the controversy starts. To come in, what was...

Carol's relationship with the Liddell family. Why was he taking these children out boating? Which is a very nice thing to do, but they must have been pretty close. Henry Liddell was the dean of the college, and so he's Carol's senior manager. He's kind of boss. Lived nearby. I suppose Carol is a

a gentle, nearby bachelor. It was just a nice thing to do. And conventions were quite different then. I don't think it was so unusual that two clerical gentlemen would take out someone else's daughters for day trips. It was considered to be quite an innocent friendship. Okay. But there's more here to be unpicked, I think. The accusations haven't come around because they went boating.

It seems that Carol, the words have been used anything from obsessive or fascination or overly interested or just an affinity for. He liked spending time with children. Yeah, he did. And it's not quite true either, although it's mostly true that he liked hanging out with young girls. And it's really hard to say these things without them sounding awful, actually. It's really hard to say...

Things which were factual and okay in the 1860s without them automatically making me feel, well, how can this be defended? He did mostly like hanging out with girls. And there was some controversy about it, which stems from the fact that, again, a mystery is created by the fact that four diaries are missing.

And several pages are cut out of one diary. And that is when there was a rift with the Liddell family. Do we know what that was about? We don't know for sure, but there's a lot of interesting rumours and interesting stories. The stories might be more interesting than the truth.

I have seen these cut pages during my research and it is... Have you? Yeah, yeah. You can see them in the British Library. I hadn't realised they actually survived. I saw the pages, the remaining pages with the cuts in them, not the pages. I saw the bit where the pages were cut. Oh, I see. I was going to go, we've solved it. Wow. Well,

Well, OK, there's a lot to this. I saw the bits where the pages were cut and they've been cut with nail scissors by Carol's nieces, it is thought, Violet and F. Manella Dodson after his death. The mystery is, and it is an interesting mystery, that there also exists a piece of notepaper, which I saw in the Dodson family collection of the Surrey History Centre in Glamorous Woking.

which summarises those pages. And the note is kind of in shorthand, so it could be interpreted in different ways. And it says that Carol is supposed by some to be courting Ina. And so different critics have surmised that this could mean that Carol is thought to be courting the mother, who's also called Lorena, or Alice's older sister.

I think the daughter is far more likely because you're not going to call Mrs. Liddle Ina in that familiar way. So he's thought by some to be courting Lorena Liddle, but that's just rumour, isn't it? But rumour would have been enough for a family to distance itself from Carol and it would have been enough, I should say Dodson at this point probably, it would have been enough for Dodson to feel...

kind of both insulted and shocked and that he must do the right thing and for him to hold himself distant. And it's also rumoured that he might have been courting the governess, Miss Prickett. So basically, there's a couple of rumours around that him hanging around the house, he must have had another reason. And I think it could be that in those times with those people, that rumour would have been enough to...

for what seemed like a rift because you had to do the right thing and say, okay, well, no questions asked, I'll stay away then because we can't have that kind of gossip. I can see that. I mean, I'm not sure how old the daughter would have been at this point when this argument rifted. The rift began in June 1863 and Lorena would have been 14. It is supposed by some, and this is one of those things that someone proposed once and because there's no more information, it gets repeated in other places.

biographies until it becomes a thing everyone knows. It's guessed that he may have proposed honourable marriage to Alice. And then some people say, well, if he proposed marriage, it would have been he went to her mother and father and said, could we have an idea in the future if this connection is still there? When it's appropriate, perhaps we could move forward with a view towards marriage.

He wouldn't have actually proposed marriage. But we don't even know that. That's just guesswork. No, we don't know anything at all. No, it's just filling in the blanks. Okay, but he would have been in his early 30s. Yeah, he would have been 31, I think. I'm not sure that people getting married at 14 would have been the normal state of affairs, even in 1865. But we are just filling in the gaps here. We don't know what the rift was. It's all rumour and supposition. They might have just fallen out.

over what they were binge watching on Netflix. You have no idea at all. We have no way of knowing. It could have been Netflix. I mean, who can really say? But this kind of, any kind of shadow of a doubt

would have been enough for people who were about respectability to back off. It didn't really need anything at all. The idea that Carol was courting the governess, Miss Prickett, would have been enough because I think that would have insulted him in terms of class. He would have been, well, of course I'm not. Would this have been widely known at the time? I mean, I completely get that. If there's any kind of whiff of impropriety, there's people with these rumours and they're not true. Yeah, you would. You'd distance yourself. Does that mean that people were gossiping at the time?

I think there would have been Oxford gossip within those circles. Oxford gossip, yeah. Yeah, within those circles. This is before Alice in Wonderland was actually published, though, so a lot of this is really retrospective. My overall view is that people try and find stories about this guy because there isn't really all that much to find, and perhaps there is a lot of complexity. It's just that we don't know it, so we've got these absences that we...

that various biographers have over the years tried to fill. A lot of it is referring to each other's work and then sometimes there's like a new document comes up or some new letters or a new interpretation or something but the evidence is really very scant. One thing that does interest to me is that in terms of his photography of children, which is another thing we've got to consider, as well as hanging out with them, we like to take pictures of them,

And as well as taking pictures of them, he liked to take pictures of them without much clothes on. He did. And as well as that, sometimes they didn't have any clothes on. And again, when you say this sort of thing, I kind of expect people to go, well, how can you possibly still defend Carol? And one of the things I find interesting about that is there was some controversy among Oxford's families about him taking the photographs. It wasn't just that Victorians had a different idea of childhood and that nude photographs...

were far more common as symbols of innocence and cherubs and everything. There was a little bit of pushback from families. I imagine so. Well, but the thing is, what we imagine would be very, very different from what it was in the 1870s, 1880s, because now if someone came around to take pictures of our children...

I mean, I don't even want to go there because it's so... I mean, no, you'd find the police, wouldn't you? It's so obvious. You wouldn't even feel comfortable saying, well, yes, obviously go and have a little river trip with this person, would you? I don't even feel comfortable having it cross my mind. Photography was a really new medium at this point, or at least it was new in the fact that amateurs like Carol was could experiment with it. So there's a newness to it. Right.

I have heard it argued that it was all right for him to be photographing nude children because he kind of recreates it in this sort of classical Greek way that they look like cherubs. I've never been quite convinced by that because I've not found other examples of children being photographed.

nude to make the argument that this is completely within the standards of the time. I have heard comparison with Carol's contemporary, Julia Margaret Cameron, who also took photographs of children. And I've also heard comparison with greeting cards at the time, which would feature ostensibly nude babies. You wouldn't see anything because they're terrobs. So there was a kind of different culture around the innocence of youth there, that there wasn't so much to be

protected and we should never see it, but there was no shame in looking at it because it was so inherently innocent. But then to our eyes now, some of the pictures look suggestive. There's a picture of Alice Liddell. There's two, I think, in fact. Alice is a beggar girl. Yeah, quite a famous picture, that one. Part of her chest is uncovered. Yeah, and no one would take that now. And yeah, he dresses them up in different ways, in sort of imaginative poses. He puts them as part of tableaus. The

The nudes, I think there are four extant nudes and others. The nudes were always in a vast minority. He took pictures of all sorts of other things like, you know, one is of a fish skeleton, for instance. So as you say, he was a pioneer in relatively new technology and art. And I suppose technology and art together would have particularly fascinated him. This guy who's on one level really logical and on one level really imaginative.

So he would have been like, you know, one of the few people practicing photography. And it was novel in that way. And he was an expert in something which is far more complicated than, you know, now we all carry a camera. But this involved, you know, chemicals and putting a canopy over my head and, you know, telling people to stand still for 30 seconds. So it's a very complicated process.

His pictures are, as you say, sort of tableaus in costume, a lot of them. The nudes, which I think still exist, they're pretty twee and sentimental and sort of mawkish. They're coloured and they're like nymphs on a beach sort of idea. You know, they're in situations, you know, stranded on a rock somewhere, like the Lost Boys or... I know that the argument is that, you know, it was a different time period.

But I think we need to look at the context of the time. I had a student who did that once for a master's research project. They looked into this to try and see what was the context of the time. And they made a really strong argument that there was actually a fetishization of young girls and virgins at this time, if you look through erotica and pornography. Not that we've got any evidence that's what Carol was doing, but...

There's also quite a strong narrative that young girls at this time were highly sexualised. But we don't know if that's what Carol was doing. If that was like what I would like to call an active discourse, if that was a dominant discourse at the time, then I would be persuaded by that. You know, I go where the evidence goes, basically. If someone could show me, and no doubt they could, that there was this kind of culture of fetishising young girls, then Carol wouldn't have been unaware of that at all. He was really culturally...

I mean, we can't rule out the possibility. He genuinely did have a... Predilection, yeah. Yeah, I think what we can be sure about is I don't think he ever acted on it, unless we count taking photos of action, which nowadays we absolutely would. Taking photos of children is absolutely an abusive action. We obviously can't know what was in his head. I don't think he thought what he was doing was wrong. I think the pushback from families was mostly because the girls were like 14, 15, 16.

And it was no longer appropriate because now they were young women rather than girls and they were entering a different sort of social category. Again, wouldn't it be interesting to know what he was thinking? Or what his relationship with the children were. I mean, do we have anything... Like when Alice Little grew up, for example, because I know that we don't have... There's no smoking gun. Nobody who had any... Because he had lots of these child friendships.

And none of them have accused him of anything improper. Nobody has said anything. This is all us looking back at what's there and trying to work it out. What was his relationship with these? Who were they, the girls in the pictures or like his child friends? Yeah, you're absolutely right. For what it's worth, all these girls who grew up into the early 20th century speak so highly of him. But then on the other hand, these days we wouldn't necessarily count that as proving anyone was innocent because it could be a trauma response or...

whatever or false memories. So by contemporary standards that doesn't mean too much but you're absolutely right there's no one who says 'oh that Lewis Carroll, you know, I always felt really uncomfortable with him'. They say the opposite and yeah I don't know. Who were the girls? They were like children of friends. Sometimes they were people you met on the beach. You used to go to Eastbourne a lot, hang out there and you know it sounds awful now but you used to go down to the beach with things like toys and safety pins to pin up their skirts and so on and drawing stuff.

stuff that almost seems grooming by today's standards but maybe it was perfectly innocent and so he used to make these child friends and their guardians and parents would let them come around his house and he's born and then and this is something we have as evidence he would write letters to them and so we do have the letters and a lot of those letters are

Actually, mini-masterpieces like the Alice books, they're really charming and clever. They're sort of, you know, "Now come now, can you do this puzzle? I'm sure even a baby could do this puzzle, so please tax your brain over this." There are all sorts of games and pictures in these letters, which seem absolutely not just fine, but really, really nice.

So we do have that. And we have his diaries, which sort of say, you know, met a wonderful little girl today. I place a white stone by this day, meaning it was a special day. At the same time, and this, because we have so little evidence to go on, some people have seized on the fact that also in his diaries, there are these desperate prayers for forgiveness and forgiveness.

absolution of sin. And so people have argued about what that could be about. Some people say it's just him being too hard on himself because he was so saintly. Any divergence from a perfect life would have tormented him. Some people say it was masturbation or nocturnal emissions, wet dreams, which obviously even a man like him would have had. We can't know. So again, it's like guesswork. Is it he felt really guilty about something he'd done or did he feel guilty about any kind of

desires that troubled him in the middle of the night as they would any person, pretty much. Any kind of dreams? Or was he just being really harsh on himself because he hadn't done as much work that year as he told himself? But in the diaries, there are these tormented dreams like, dear Lord, please save your forsaken servant and purge me of this and let me start anew and refresh. He had a troubled conscience, but we can't know why, can we? No, we can't.

I'll be back with Will and Alice after this short break. If you're a parent or share a fridge with someone, Instacart is about to make grocery shopping so much easier. Because with family carts, you can share a cart with your partner and each add the items you want. Since between the two of you, odds are you'll both remember everything you need.

And this way, you'll never have to eat milkless cereal again. So minimize the stress of the weekly shop with Family Carts. Download the Instacart app and get delivery in as fast as 30 minutes. Plus, enjoy $0 delivery fees on your first three orders. Service fees apply for three orders in 14 days, excludes restaurants. I'm Josie Santee, health coach, wellness editor, and host of the Every Girl podcast.

where we cut through the noise with realistic, expert-backed advice to help you thrive in every category of life while still loving the person that you already are. And part of loving yourself is being really authentic to you, including the clothes you wear.

In partnership with Nordstrom, we're helping you update your spring wardrobe so your style is fit for your best self. Nordstrom brings you the season's most wanted brands like Skims, Mango, Free People, and Princess Polly, all under $100. From trending sneakers to beauty must-haves, we've curated the styles that you'll wear on repeat this spring. Free shipping, free returns, and in-store pickup make it easier than ever. Show

Shop now in stores and at Nordstrom.com. It's so difficult because if this happened today, it would be a crime. There are laws against it. You can't do that at all. So you have to constantly try and contextualize it.

And then also you are filling in the gaps. Very difficult because from a modern point of view, a crime has been committed, but we can't know what was going on inside his head. We should remember as well that this is a very controversial topic within crime

Carolian studies, and it has been for a very, very long time, and will be viciously debated by lots and lots of different people. When did this even start to come to light? Well, actually, it's not very much debated because among Carolians, the strictly agreed consensus is he did nothing wrong and that any insinuations are poisonous.

Because I'm a bit more distant from that circle now, I feel a bit more kind of removed from it. But at the time when I was hanging around in those circles, the only thing you could possibly say was, this is judging a man unfairly by contemporary standards. Yeah, yeah. When did it come to light? Well, his nephew, Stuart Collingwood Dodson, very shortly after Carol's death, wrote the first biography.

And it was basically the sky was the same on earth. How much we're going to miss the wonderful Lewis Carroll and how wonderful he's left these gifts behind for generations. It's the kind of book you'd expect your nephew to write. And pretty much at the same time, I suppose, his nieces were pretty much the same time burning the diaries and cutting the pages out. So if we join these things up, it does look like a sort of cover-up job, doesn't it? Then, as I say, I think we have the Carroll that we deserve and that we create. It was the rise of

Freudianism into popular culture and understanding. So you're talking about the 40s, really, when just like in cinema, you get kind of psychological film noir around that time. That's when people start to use

A version of psychoanalysis to think, well, what was the unconscious? What was going on there? And that's when the story about his obsession with Alice really emerges. It was haunted by Alice all his life. It doesn't help that he wrote a poem about Alice. Still, she haunts me phantom wise. I think it says Alice moving under skies never seen by waking eyes, which almost seems to be saying the quiet bit out.

out loud. But that's when it's like, what's the unconscious motivation? He must have been obsessed with this girl, Alice, all his life. And then various biographers, as I say, just try to come up with a slightly different version of what they've got. But it really says more, I think, about the frameworks we use at the time than it does anything about Lewis Carroll. It's so complicated, really. It's a bigger picture to me about how do we talk about stuff in the past? Do we apply our own

views and knowledge to it, or is that completely anachronistic? The same way, could we talk about Oscar Wilde in terms of LGBT culture and rights and everything? I have these discussions in class. Is it right to say Oscar Wilde was gay? Well, in a sense, no, because the term gay didn't enter into popular culture until the 20th century. So

But then what should we call our school world? I wouldn't want to call them the terms which were used at the time. And even homosexual sounds a bit over-formal. No. Now, do you see what I mean? Can we use contemporary terms to describe the things?

the Victorians. It's a big discussion for me. It's made so much harder by the fact that we just don't know. We don't have a smoking gun. There was no accusations made. No one was put on trial. No evidence was tested. This is us looking back and feeling intensely uncomfortable. And I'm sure everyone who's listening we've made feel intensely uncomfortable as well. Yeah, sorry about that. It's hard not to, isn't it? It's just what happened, isn't it? It's really hard not to. To be more generous,

I think it's also our type of celebrity culture, which we're now applying back and thinking, well, there must be a smoking gun. It can't be everything that it seems. But what if it can? With all celebrities now, if someone's really well behaved, we're looking for the scandal. What if there isn't a scandal? What if he was just this kind of unusual guy, like the company of kids, also hang out with adults,

really good at logic, not a very good teacher, liked maths, also had an amazing imagination. What if he was just this incredibly unique guy? To be fair, we've never seen a guy like that again, really. But he's just an incredibly individual creator and we should be glad he's got these books. But I think it does say something about our view of celebrity that we're thinking, well, what's the hidden story here? It's possible that there isn't one. As a final question...

Do you think that this information about Carol would shape how we read and understand Alice? This is the question about separating the art from the artist, I suppose. I'm really glad you asked that. Such a massive contemporary issue.

Even this year, maybe no names, we've had authors who are much beloved and have been very important to people for decades who now are involved in accusations of terrible crimes and abuse. So this is absolutely ongoing at the moment on social media. Can we separate the art from the artist? Should we give away our books by a favourite artist who's turned out to be disappointing? Mm-hmm.

Well, I think it's got to be down to the individual. I mean, personally, you know, and I hope I can be forgiven for thinking that my Alice book is precious because my mum gave it to me and it serves an important part of my life. Would I read Alice to my son? That becomes another question, doesn't it? I mean, you know, he likes Minecraft and Mario, so he's not exactly saying, you know, Daddy, what's that book? Please.

Please can I read that Victorian book? You know, if he did, would I try and contextualise it a little bit? Quite probably I would. People are still, you know, Tim Burton made his Alice films quite recently. Alice is still big at Disneyland. Yeah. So it's almost like Alice has kind of become...

almost slightly separated. Even in my own book, like 25 years ago, I said it seems that people still cherish Alice, but they wouldn't want Lewis Carroll to be the one who reads it to their children. I think we're still in that place where we might have to either forget Lewis Carroll or we just think of him as the saintly figure, because I don't think we can hold both ideas in our mind at the same time, that we love Alice in Wonderland as his innocent book, and yet

this guy was really problematic. I don't think we can do it. Perhaps we should be able to entertain contradictions, but I mean, it's difficult. Will, you have been fascinating and challenging to talk to. You've been marvellous. If people want to know more about you and your work, where can they find you?

I work at Kingston University. So if anyone wants to contact me, they can find me on the Kingston University website, I think, and they'd be very welcome to drop me an email. And you've been so fascinating and challenging as well. Thank you so much. I feel we went beyond Carol into some really huge issues of history there. Well, thank you very much. You've been a pleasure. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Thank you for listening and thank you so much to Will for joining me. If you like what you heard, please don't forget to like, review and follow along wherever it is that you get your podcasts. If you'd like us to explore a subject or maybe you just wanted to say hello, then you can email us at betwixt at historyhit.com. We've got episodes on everything from more real wives of dictators to the horrible, awful history of gonorrhoea all coming your way. This podcast was edited by Tom DeLarge and produced by Sophie Gee.

The senior producer was Charlotte Long. Join me again betwixt the sheets, the history of sex scandal in society, a podcast by History Hit. This podcast contains music from Epidemic Sound. I love ravioli. Since when do you speak Italian? Since we partnered with SAP Concur. Their integrated travel and expense platform and breakthrough solutions with AI gave me time back to dive into our financial future. We expand into Europe in 2027, so...

I'm getting ready. Well, you can predict the future? I can predict you'll like that message. What message? Oh, hey, we all got bonuses. You can save for college now. I don't have kids. Hmm, you don't say. SAP Concur helps your business move forward faster. Learn more at concur.com.

I'm Josie Santee, health coach, wellness editor, and host of the Every Girl podcast, where we cut through the noise with realistic, expert-backed advice to help you thrive in every category of life while still loving the person that you already are. And part of loving yourself is being really authentic to you, including the clothes you wear.

In partnership with Nordstrom, we're helping you update your spring wardrobe so your style is fit for your best self. Nordstrom brings you the season's most wanted brands like Skims, Mango, Free People, and Princess Polly, all under $100. From trending sneakers to beauty must-haves, we've curated the styles that you'll wear on repeat this spring. Free shipping, free returns, and in-store pickup make it easier than ever.

Shop now in stores and at Nordstrom.com.