Babbage: Science book club
42:23 Share

Hello, this episode of Babbage is available to listen for free. But if you want to listen every week, you'll need to be an Economist subscriber. For full details, search online for Economist Podcast Plus.

From office spaces to F1 races, from factory floors to rigs offshore, from cafe chains to shipping cranes, wherever your people work, TeamViewer brings the power of the digital workplace there too, securely connecting experts, data, devices, and machines, automating support for your IT and OT, enabling everyone and everything to perform at their best.

So discover how TeamViewer can make work, work better, wherever it happens. Learn more at teamviewer.com slash work better. The Economist. Just a short walk away from Trafalgar Square, nestled in the heart of central London, is an underground treasure trove. This is Principia Mathematica by Sir Isaac Newton. So this is from 1687.

It is the work that Newton is probably best known for. This is his description of the workings of the universe. Books have long held a vital place in science, and the Royal Society Library holds some of the most weird and wonderful books of all. In honour of the books that have shaped, spurred and spread science over the centuries, our producer Kunal Patel had a look at some of the Royal Society's more interesting tomes.

My name is Keith Moore. I'm head of library at the Royal Society. So here we have, from 1665, Robert Hooke's book Micrographia. So this is a seriously large book with great illustrations of what one might expect to see through a microscope. And the most famous of the lot is his drawing of the flea. But I kind of like the head louse and various other things in here.

Probably the most famous natural history book of all time is this one. This is Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species. So this is one that Charles Darwin himself presented to the organisation. Books are vital to science because this is one of the ways that scientists circulate ideas. Books are just a wonderful way of

communicating with people. I always like to say that most of my friends are dead people. It's because I read a lot of books. It's a great way of connecting people with ideas, with personalities. I'm Alok Jha and this is Babbage from The Economist. Today we're bringing you something a bit different. The science books that have inspired us. The Economist

Today I'm joined by our producer, Kunal Patel, who, as I understand it, is our resident literary aficionado. Hi, Kunal. It's nice to have you here. KUNAL PATEL: Hi. I've been known to read a book on occasion. Well, this is very exciting.

We all know, if you're listening to this podcast, that we probably enjoy books. We certainly all do here. But tell me what you think is important about the relationship between books and science. Well, I think books are a really accessible medium. A lot of science can be very esoteric, particularly scientific papers. Almost all science is esoteric, you're right. Yeah. And I think books are really the original form of science communication, distilling science down to something that's understandable and evocative.

even beautiful in some senses. And so I remember that even like as a kid, the first thing that kind of got me interested in science is I just had this like massive collection of nature encyclopedias. And I would just pour over the pictures of all these animals and things. So yeah, it was really my gateway drug to science. And I'm sure it's the same for a lot of people who are even vaguely interested in science.

first accessing ideas that are quite complicated and abstract through interesting narratives and books that can explain things like physics or evolution in beautiful stories. They're just wonderful things. And of course, you start with Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species, which in itself is just a nice book to read, even though it is also the original book that introduces the idea of natural selection. Of course, the medium itself allows for more discussion, doesn't it? We try and do that on the podcast, of course, by having chats sometimes.

But books allow you to sort of develop and think about ideas and just take ideas to their logical conclusions or have thought experiments and stuff. Yeah, I think books really give scientists and science writers permission to break the style of academic writing or news writing and really have fun with it and blend science with art a bit more and really lean into that storytelling instinct I think most people have.

which, incidentally, is, as you said, something we try to do on this show. Well, OK, look, this is a special edition of the show then, and I'm very excited about it. You've been putting this together for a few weeks. Tell us what we've got around the corner. Yeah, so with the end of the year coming up, I thought it was about time that we at Babbage reflected on the science books that have inspired us over the years. So a Babbage book club. Exactly. And so to kick things off, Alok, do you have a favourite science book? Well, you know, I've read a lot of science books for work and pleasure and...

The one I keep coming back to, the one I keep rereading, which I suppose I love the most, is The Periodic Table by Primo Levi. It was published in 1975. It's a collection of short stories, and each story is named after a different chemical element from the periodic table. And the idea is that Primo Levi uses chemistry, and specifically the chemistry of the element in question, as a metaphor for some story about life that he wants to tell you.

So I guess in a bit more detail, what is it about? Is it a memoir? Yeah, it's part memoir. So there are chapters which are about his family and his upbringing in Italy. So there's chapters like Phosphorus, which is a little detective story, really. So Primo Levi, during his life, he was a chemist and he worked in a paint factory. And

He identifies different elements that are responsible for making paint function, essentially. You don't think about it very much in real life, but, you know, sometimes a batch of paint won't reach the standards you need it to reach or it'll solidify for some reason because an element is missing. And so he uses his time there to explain bits of chemistry to you in his work. But also then he drops in a bit of fiction now and again as well. So there's a few chapters which are essentially tiny little stories about people discovering iron for the first time.

Or my favorite one, which is Carbon, which is the story of a carbon atom from space going all the way through various different star clouds and atoms and different molecules and plants and things on Earth, all the way to being a part of Primo Levi himself. It's like a really interesting, grand sweeping story about the importance of this particular element. And it's done incredibly poetically. So why does that resonate with you?

Well, the thing is, when I read it for the first time, I was told that it's an amazing book and I should read it. And I did, and I really enjoyed it. And I wasn't expecting to love it as much because, you know, I like science in all its guises, but chemistry was my subject that I did not really enjoy that much. I found physics much more interesting. But this book transformed my idea of what chemistry is. It wasn't just atoms and molecules interacting with each other and exploding and smelling in different ways.

But chemistry is not a subject. It's life. It's reality. Every single behaviour is chemical in some part. And Primo Levi in his book does not make life into chemistry. But by talking about chemistry, which is something he loved, then it makes you understand life in a much more profoundly interesting and new way, which I hadn't really thought about. And

One of the things I would say about this book is that Primo Levi famously is a survivor of Auschwitz. So he was a Jew in Italy in the 1940s. He was packed off to Auschwitz. And because he was a chemist, they found use for him as a slave laborer in the chemistry laboratories. So there's a chapter called Sirium and another called Vanadium.

Now, these elements are rare earth metals, essentially, that you use to make batteries. But because he knew how to get them out of different materials, he was able to make elements and chemical compounds for his Nazi superiors, essentially. So they kept him alive. So there's darkness in the book as well. It's not just light stories about life. It's life, it's family, it's chemistry, it's darkness, it's everything.

And from all of that, is there a particular moment or section that really stayed with you? So I think that the chapter on carbon is my favorite because he sort of takes this flight of fancy for a carbon atom being created in the cosmos and then it floats around and ends up on Earth and becomes part of a plant and then it goes into a dinosaur and all these other things.

And I think many writers have tried to do similar things with other things. I certainly have. I wrote a book about water once and I tried to do the same thing with a molecule of water. It's fun, but I didn't do it quite as nicely as Primo Levi. But it's just a rollicking space adventure which ends in the most lovely way. I don't want to spoil it for you because, honestly, it will make your heart stop the way that story ends. Well, apart from the heart-stopping ending, why do you think other people should read the book?

Because it gives you a bit of everything. It's not a science book in the sense it's trying to explain some bit of science to you. It's about life. And it's about this human being, Premier Levy, who's a fascinating human being. And you get little windows of his life. And he's just one of the...

I mean, this sounds like a trite thing to say. He's just one of the best people that's ever lived. He's such a good person. And knowing about his life will enrich you. And this is the way he's decided to tell his story in this particular book. And I think that everyone should know about his life. That sounds beautiful. Thank you very much for giving us an insight into the unknowable mind of Alok Shah. Well, slightly more notable, I hope. Yeah. It's unknowable to me anyway.

Well, all right, to get things going then, which economist correspondent do you think I should speak to first? All right, well, look, why don't we start with somebody who we've spoken to very recently on the show, Rachel Dobbs, our climate correspondent. She's been talking about carbon, geoengineering, all these things. So let's continue the theme. Testing, testing, one, two, three.

All right, first, I guess, just if you want to do a little self-identification. Hi, I'm Rachel. I'm one of the climate correspondents here at The Economist. Rachel, thank you very much for joining me for Babbage's inaugural book club. So what's your favorite science book? My favorite science book is, and the reason I'm laughing is that it is almost entirely fictional, but it is When We Cease to Understand the World by Benjamin Labatut, who is a Chilean author. It was published in 2020, and it is...

It's described as a non-fiction novel. It starts with an essay that is almost entirely factual, apart from the last paragraph. And then to hear the author describe it, it becomes more fictional as the book goes on. And the fiction is like this sort of mad outgrowth that eventually takes over the entire book. But it is primarily about the transition from classical to quantum physics and the scientists involved in that transition against the backdrop of the two world wars. Okay.

Okay. It's a very weird book. And what about it resonates with you so much? So I have always really liked physics and also not really understood physics.

physics. I am somebody who read A Brief History of Time and then had to read A Briefer History of Time and then still couldn't understand it, despite the fact that I'm pretty sure A Brief History of Time is written for children. But what I think it does really brilliantly is, A, it actually makes a lot of very difficult physics concepts comprehensible, but also it looks in kind of very close detail at what drives people to

the sort of obsessiveness and the single mindedness that you need to try and understand some of these concepts. And also, despite them being incredibly cerebral, the extent to which they come out of a desire for order and for

finding certain aspects of the world and humanity kind of incomprehensible. What about that to you is so compelling? One of the things that I've always really liked about science is that science is a very human endeavour. And I think it's actually a very emotional endeavour. I see that a lot in the kind of writing that I do about climate, because it's very much about humanity's continued existence in the world, but it's sort of underpinned by a lot of these very sort of esoteric

like atmospheric physics or the chemistry of the ozone layer or stuff like that. And so I think that I find it very compelling because it couples kind of those two separate drives. Yeah, I feel like that's not a particularly clear answer. That was my favourite answer that you've given. It was lovely. Also, it is just absolutely beautifully written. It's also beautifully translated. Yeah, I started reading it and have not got through it yet.

The thing that drew me to the book is that I read a quote about, I don't know if it's lemon trees that blossom all at once right before they die. Yes. So that is based on something true, which is that does happen at the end of the life of particularly citrus trees, is which they know that they're dying and they put out all of their energy and all of their minerals into making this like terrifying glut of fruit that

in this kind of very creepy, almost kind of gothic horror way. I'm imagining that's the quote that you read. It is, except I read it and I'm like, oh, that's so beautiful. It was not giving gothic horror in my brain. It gives gothic horror in the book, I think. Well, because it's like this mad abundance before something decays, and the abundance is a sign of decay. I saw it as kind of like a swan song kind of thing, like its last kind of bloom of life before. Okay, maybe I'm just more depressive than you are. Is there a particular part of the book that really like...

stood out to you that sticks with you still? A lot of what the book focuses on is the kind of unintended consequences that can come from science. So, you know, the principles that underlie...

Ultimately, the atomic bomb, but also a lot of other warfare, were not the endeavour of the scientists who originally came up with them. Grothendieck, whose name I'm almost definitely butchering, who was an incredibly influential and important mathematician, became incredibly, incredibly disillusioned with it and essentially became something of a hermit in his later life. And that passage I found very emotive in the dual problem of

Wanting to understand incredibly esoteric concepts and also that understanding being based often in distress with the world or being a reaction to or against some kind of emotional lever. And why do you think people should read it? Honestly, I think people should read it, A, because it's an incredibly well executed and

odd piece of writing in that I think it's very rare to approach something that scientific in this kind of very creative way in which you are marrying together sort of fiction and non-fiction. It's beautifully executed. The sleight of hand that he does is amazing. After I read it the first time and then at the end, the sort of degree to which it's fictionalized and how the fiction changes throughout is revealed. I then went and read it again and it is

completely seamless the way that he does it. Right. Thank you very much, Rachel. Who are the economists do you think I should speak to next? I think you should speak next to Ken Kukie because he is a man of very eclectic interests and enthusiasms. And I would be very interested to know what his favorite science book was. Well, would you like to introduce yourself?

My name is Kenneth Kukie. I'm the Deputy Executive Editor of The Economist. Thank you very much for joining me for Babbage's Book Club. So, what's your favorite science book? The one I want to discuss today that made the biggest impact for me is called A Theory of Everyone by Michael Muthukrishna. What Muthukrishna is talking about

is cultural evolution. Cultural evolution takes the idea that we evolve as a society, but that all that we have, we've inherited from the past and use without thinking about it. That our success as a species is not based on cognition, but based on culture.

But culture, which is, if you will, information that's transmitted from one person to another, from one generation to another, is not seen. You actually have to deliberately stop and see it. Now, his point, though, which is a great one, is that if we stop and look at all of these features of our culture, our institutions, our bureaucracy, our use of money, our educational systems, how it fails, how it succeeds –

What we can do is two things. We can see what worked and what didn't. But more importantly, we can then do a better job of using culture, designing the features of society into having a better future, one that doesn't have some of our shortcomings and our lapses. And so why does this sweeping account of human history and cultural evolution resonate with you as an individual? I am really in a quandary right now.

thinking through a world that looks very different than what I anticipated. The rise of Trumpism, of national populism, Russia invading Ukraine, the terrible situations in the Middle East, as well as the rise of intolerance. The idea that very basic agreements on how we treat each other, just to get on in the world, seems to have frayed and broken down.

I'm curious about first why it's broken down, but also how to repair it, how to build it back up. Because I think we need that. We need to bring that back in. So stepping forward into cultural evolution has opened my eyes into this new domain that I really didn't know existed. And is there a particular moment from the book that really stuck with you? On almost every page, you have a, pardon my French, holy shit moment in which you think,

Like if we were to take this seriously, we would design our institutions like this. We would change laws like this. We would reimagine this process like that. It's a fabulous book because it takes this one idea and it justifies it. It upholds it and substantiates it.

with rigor, and then you're on a rocket thinking about the world in a new way. I think it's really interesting that you've decided to look to the past to find a new perspective on present issues. Is there a particular moment from the book that really stood out to you in that respect? Yes. He cites one of his mentors and collaborators, Joseph Heinrich, a scholar, whose famous aphorism is, "'It's better to be social than to be smart.'"

If you rely on just your individual smartness, you've got to hope that you're going to be good enough to respond to every challenge you face, answer any question that presents itself to you, and do it correctly. And if you're not smart enough, you're dead.

But if it's better to be social than to be smart suggests that you don't need to know the answer. You just need to turn to the other people in your community or in the world who do know the answer to get the answer. And by getting the answer, you happen to also become smarter yourself. But the key thing is that it underscores this idea that

The collective brain is what advances civilization and progress in society, not the individual constituents in it. So what does that mean? It's better to be social than to be smart. It really is a relief for people like myself who didn't come as in doubt as we would like mentally. It's good to know. So, so too, as civilizationally,

You don't want to rely on the lone genius. You do want to integrate people. If you don't have that, if you are blocking half the labor force because they have XX chromosomes and not XY chromosomes, if you do it on grounds of religion or on grounds of race or on grounds of race,

sexual orientation, whatever it is, well, you will underperform as a society. It will be forestalling that potential innovation, those new ideas, those responses to challenges. So in the spirit of being social, who at The Economist do you think I should speak to next? Well, there's a number of people at The Economist who I'd recommend you could speak to next. But the person who I definitely recommend you do not speak to is Emily Steinmark, under no condition should you speak to Emily Steinmark next. Oh, absolutely not.

My name is Emily Steinmark, and I am on the US digital team based in New York. Thank you for joining us all the way from New York. You might recognize Emily from her reporting on our embryoids episode. Thank you for coming back. I'm glad we haven't scarred you. Yeah, no, absolutely. Happy to be back. So let's cut to the chase. What's your favorite science book?

My favorite science book is Madame Curie by Eve Curie, her daughter. And it came out in 1937. Oh, OK. So it's a vintage. It's a vintage. I mean, if I I know this is a podcast, but I would show you my copy, which is super, super old from the like 40s, a sort of lovely hand bandage.

bound book. Where did you manage to get a hold of this lovely hand-bound vintage edition? My dad is a book nerd. He is really into sort of old books that have been bound by hand. And during the height of his obsession with this, he was very keen for everyone else to be into it too, which I appreciate. I'm the same. And so he got me it for Christmas.

Well, I guess you heard it here. If any of you are still doing any holiday shopping, really, really old copies of Marie Curie's autobiography are hit with the kids, apparently. Yeah, I was pleased. Obviously, it's a biography of Marie Curie. But tell us a bit about what it's about. Yeah, I think the thing that makes this book really special is that her daughter, Eve, wrote it. It's

So you get a really intimate look into her life. You see how when she was a child, she wasn't this like prodigy genius that you might expect. She was a normal girl. You see how she was growing up in Poland during the Russian Empire. And you see how she and other people like her had to hustle to even access education. And you follow her to Paris. And when she meets Pierre and just this like fantastic partnership that they forge together.

initially over science, but then they become a couple and start a family. There's something truly, I don't know, it just gives you a sense of how moving science can be as something that brings people together and how moving education and knowledge and just the thirst for that can just animate people's lives. There's a real romanticism to it. And I think, obviously, it's written by her daughter, so you have to kind of keep that in mind. But

I think it does say something about the role that science and the obsession with the work that they were doing, how that really filled their family life. Why does this very holistic portrait of Mercury resonate with you?

I think there are a few reasons. The first one is probably more to do about how the book came into my life. So during the pandemic, I used to call my late grandmother and we would have these discussions around books. She couldn't go to the library. So I had a bunch of books sent to her and we'd talk about them on the phone. And she would go on about this book about Marie Curie that she'd read. And she was like, you must read it because at the time I was a PhD student in physics.

And then my dad gave it to me for Christmas. And it was just this lovely book. And I was really excited to read it. My grandmother got cancer. And actually, it's one of the last books that we managed to discuss before she died. So personally, it's got a huge connection for me. But also, my grandma was a really bright woman. And she didn't have the opportunity to go to high school. It just wasn't really what the girls did at the time. And so...

Something about the way that Mary or Maria really had to fight for her education. It felt like it wasn't that long ago. You know, it felt like these were things that people I knew had to deal with, not to the same extent, of course, but I think for women and other people that have been disadvantaged to just fight for education.

The right to educate themselves and to know more stuff about the world like that really hit home for me. I also just think it's interesting to see Mary Curie as a person outside of her science. She's radical from a young age. She is constantly doing things that she thinks is important, even if it's forbidden by the regime that she lives under. And I think...

Her choice to go to France and like the real sadness it is for her that she can't return to Poland and she can't pursue her career there. It just reminds you that it was a super struggle and...

It's not just remarkable that she was the genius that she was. It was remarkable she got to be that genius despite everything. And that was all I had to say on the propaganda for Marie Curie. I mean, that sounds like there's an insane amount in that book that I mean, already I've learned a lot more about Marie Curie than I knew before. But why do you think people should read it?

Oh, that's a really good question. She was so unusual for her time. I mean, even outside of her time, right? How many women is it that have won the Nobel Prize in physics now? Is it five or something? She was just so, so unusual. And I think we like to imagine genius as being this special, blessed thing, you know, a gift from God sort of situation. And I think in many ways she was totally normal, totally ordinary. She was just completely normal.

obsessed. And I think, you know, she was moved by the same things that everyone else is moved by. It's really an eye opener on how extraordinary and ordinary that she was. Well, thank you for giving us a peek behind the curtain to what inspires you in science writing. Who as the economist do you think I should speak to next?

That's a really good question. The Economist is full of really interesting people. I think you should speak to Jeff Carr. He joined The Economist back in like 1991, which was a year before I was born as a science correspondent. So I feel like he would have just bags of knowledge about stuff. I'm sure he's read tons of books. I can only imagine it will be super interesting. Excellent choice. All right. Well, thank you very much for your time. Thank you.

I'm Geoffrey Carr and I'm Senior Editor Science and Technology at The Economist. Thank you very much for joining me for Babbage's very first book club. Pleasure. So, what's your favorite science book? Well, I'm going to offer two because they came out at more or less the same time. They're on very similar subjects and they influenced the course of my career.

And the first one is Sociobiology by a man called Edward Wilson, who was at Harvard, now dead sadly. And the other was The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins, who was and remains at Oxford. And can you tell me what they're both about? Well, they're both about the shift...

to a gene-centered view of evolution and particularly in the context of behavior where because you can see the phenotypes which are the expressions of a gene's action on an animal much more easily and do experiments on behavior rather than anatomy. In the 1970s when these books were published they informed the way that animal behavior was being studied and they've led to a

serious change in the way that people look at the nuts and bolts of evolution. So how old were you when you first read them? I would have been 19 or 20. I was an undergraduate and I was a zoologist. And so reading this at that time, why did it resonate with you so much? Well, it was a new thing. And yeah, when you're that age, you like new things. It fitted in with the idea that life is formed and diversified by evolution, which I believed ever since I was capable of believing such things.

but it clarified things in a very nice way. And when I read them, I wanted to do research, but I wasn't quite sure which direction to go in. And I was kind of thinking that marine biology would be an interesting area because there's a much greater diversity of animals in the oceans than there are on the land. And also, in my slightly naive undergraduate mind, I felt it might get you to go to lots of interesting parts of the world.

And when I read these books and thought about this stuff and, you know, talked with my teachers, I actually thought studying animal behavior would be a more fruitful line of endeavor. And that's what I ended up doing. Is there a particular moment or chapter in the book that really stuck out to you? Well, there's one sort of outlier chapter in The Selfish Gene, which looks at not genes, but the idea of what Dawkins called memes.

which are culturally transmitted evolutionary units. I've always found this idea interesting, and if I ever went back to academia, I think I'd look into it. Nobody's ever really quite made it work, although the word meme has itself become, in a new sense, a meme, and is used for an idea that spreads around the internet.

But this is the idea of stuff that spreads culturally from person to person, such as aspects of language, aspects of religion, music, that sort of thing. And how much memes are independently evolving and how much they are contributing to the underlying genetic evolution of people, I think is an extremely interesting question. It's worth reading if you want to see how a wide range of groups of animals might have arrived at social behavior.

from Coral to us. Thank you very much, Geoff. Who at The Economist do you think I should speak to next? Well, I suggest you speak to Abby Bertix, who is the latest recruit to the science section. I recruited her myself and she joined last year, I think. Thank you very much. Would you like to introduce yourself? I'm Abby and I'm a science correspondent at The Economist.

Thank you very much for joining me for Babbage's very first Science Book Club. You're not going to have yourself saying a welcome statement 30 times, or are you? I think I am, actually. It's like an AA meeting. Yeah, a little bit. Science Writers Anonymous. All right, Abby, so what's your favorite science book? Favorite's a really complicated question, Kunal, but one of my favorites is Why Fish Don't Exist by Lulu Miller.

Okay, this is clearly a science book that has stood out to you in some way. What is it about? It's a blend of a lot of different things, which is partly why I like it. There's biography blended with memoir, blended with science, blended with philosophy. And kind of the guiding thread throughout it all is she's trying to make sense of her life. And the guy that she's writing about is also trying to make sense of the physical world.

The person that she's writing about is morally complex, to say the least. He's a eugenicist, so not a great guy. But in spite of that, it leads to some really interesting discussion of science and philosophy, particularly about categories and labels. And at the center of it is the story about taxonomy. On the surface, it's about fish. And a really interesting fact is that

fish as like a taxonomical label, as a category, just doesn't exist. Like we humans take it for granted, we're like, oh yeah, that's a fish. But if you look at the little tree that ends up happening, it's not a nice subtree of fish. Things get really complicated if you look at it too closely.

And why does that idea and this book resonate with you? I think part of it is that I have this like pet idea in my brain at all times that nothing really exists.

which is a little obscure. But I think that the closer you look at anything, like when you're in a plane flying above the ocean and you see, OK, there's the coast, you have ocean, you have sand. It looks like there's a nice clear line between the two. But when you're standing on that beach, there's no clear line. And this kind of pet notion in my mind is that humans hallucinate boundaries that aren't there.

So when we're studying these kind of categories, these things that humans have hallucinated, I don't think they actually exist in real life, which sounds kind of wacky. But every time you look at anything from a scientific point of view, the closer you zoom in, you kind of realize that there is no discrete boundary separating things. That's just what we've made up to make sense of the world.

Yeah, it's really interesting as an idea. In this book, she cuts along the fact that it says more about us and the human condition that we feel the need to put things in nice and neat boxes and understand things in such a compartmentalized, categorized way than it does about the wild and chaotic and mysterious natural world that we're trying to tame. What's your takeaway from this book that we should obliterate all categories?

No, I think pragmatically they serve a really important purpose. But I think it's also really important and interesting to occasionally question their existence. Is there a particular moment or chapter or idea from this book that really stuck with you? I like the notion that if you look at anything, no matter how simple or how much you think you understand it, especially if you think you understand it, looking harder at something...

kind of reveals a lot of complexity and mystery. And that's kind of what a lot of science is. And I just think the fact that everywhere around you,

There are things that we take for granted, categories we take for granted, objects we take for granted, that have infinite mystery and infinite potential of understanding in them is something that would drive me as a scientist and does drive me as a science writer to try to better understand the world around me. I think that's one of my favorite things about Lulu Miller as a writer, as a storyteller, a big Radiolab fan.

And I think the way that they don't take anything for granted, they find all of this wonder and joy in things that you would not expect to find it in is...

What I find very compelling about their work and what also motivates me as a storyteller as well. And she's also got a very good way with words. Yeah, I mean, I want to be her when I grow up. So that's another reason why this book is really awesome to me. And to people who aren't converts to the Church of Lulu Miller, why do you think other people should read it? The way that she writes is just beautiful. It's not a burden on your brain to read it. But I think it's also just...

The excitement and curiosity with which she sees and investigates the world is contagious. Like after reading this book, you'll find yourself more excited to be in whatever mundane situation you might find yourself in because she finds wonder kind of everywhere. Thank you very much for your time, Abby. Thank you, Kunal. I'll be back with Kunal in just a moment.

First, though, if you've been enjoying today's episode of Babbage, there's plenty more recommendations for the holiday season in the pages of The Economist. Every year, my colleagues on the Culture Desk write guides to the finest cultural treats, from the year's best games to films and even podcasts. I'm sure they recommend this one as one of the best, as well as our comprehensive list of books of the year. Don't worry, there's a science and technology section within that, too. You can find a link to those pages in the show notes.

From office spaces to F1 races, from factory floors to rigs offshore, from cafe chains to shipping cranes, wherever your people work, TeamViewer brings the power of the digital workplace there too, securely connecting experts, beta, devices, and machines, automating support for your IT and OT, enabling everyone and everything to perform at their best.

So discover how TeamViewer can make work, work better, wherever it happens. Learn more at teamviewer.com slash work better. Today, our producer Kunal Patel has been speaking to our correspondents about the science books that inspired them. So Kunal, what was it like to get an insight into the inner literary lives of our colleagues?

Well, we always hear from our correspondents on Babbage talking about their reporting or the stories they've been working on. But it was really nice to take a step back from that and see what inspires them to write and talk about science and sometimes what inspired them to get into being a science journalist.

And it was just really lovely to see how excited they all got about all these different books that they'd read. It's always good to hear journalists getting excited about something because otherwise we're all such a cynical bunch that sometimes it's good to just force them back into remembering why they enjoyed the stuff in the first place. And you can excuse some of the cheesiness and strangeness.

schmaltziness right now because it is Christmas time so I think it's okay. Now given that you've talked to all of the correspondents about their books and even got me to talk about my book let's round this off with you then Kunal. So what's the science book that inspired you? What would you choose as your favourite book? So my favourite science book

is How Far the Light Reaches by Sabrina Imbler, which is a memoir told through 10 different sea creatures. Okay, so just tell us a bit more about what the book is about. Yeah, so it is a memoir by the author, but it's told in this way. It's actually quite similar to your book, just, I guess, the biology version of The Periodic Table.

So essentially it goes through ten different sea creatures and relates each one of them through metaphor to some aspect of the author's life. So we have chapters like My Mother and the Starving Octopus, which talks about this deep-sea octopus that basically starves itself for several years while it takes care of its eggs.

And it has this lovely poetic way of writing and it's just incredibly creative and beautiful the way that she takes these animals and ties them to her lived experiences. I mean, already from the examples you've given me, I'm finding resonances with my own mum and my grandma in terms of like people who look after you without sort of looking after themselves. Why does it resonate with you particularly? Are there particular bits of it that you see within yourself?

Yeah, she writes in this really lovely lyrical style. The imagery is so vivid and it's just so deeply emotional. And yet you're learning all of these things about like yeti crabs and how they dance on these vents. And then she's tying it to like finding queer community. And it's just the unexpected nature of the connections between these things that I think is just so lovely. I think it's always the best way to learn about something through a story, through something which we're not expecting to learn something from.

But you find that resonance almost as a sort of side product of the thing you're trying to be taught. I think it's the best books, the best writing of all sorts does all of that. Is there a particular bit of the book that struck a chord with you? Yes. So there's a chapter called How to Draw a Sperm Whale, which talks about whaling. And in particular, after a whale has died, scientists perform necropsies on them. And then it relates that back to...

to a failed romantic relationship that the author had. So it goes between necropsy of a whale, describing how this whale that was killed by... Where is this going? This is fascinating. Well, yeah. It's the wrong word for a relationship, but go on. It goes back and forth between this story of this whale that was killed in a ship strike and then to the author's first...

lesbian relationship when she was in university and how that fell apart. And it's jumping back and forth between these things. And then it also goes back to talk about the history of whaling. And it just draws all of these things together in this lovely way where you're both learning about how humans as a species decimated whale populations. And then also about this very intimate relationship that slowly spun itself out. I love it. It sounds messy and complicated and exactly the kind of story that

would make a fascinating narrative. It sounds amazing. It'll definitely go on my list of books to read. In fact, so will all of the books that our correspondents have recommended. Shamefully, I haven't read any of them. I mean, this is terrible. I thought I read a lot of books in science and I've got another load to add to my list. So thank you to you for having the idea for this episode. And can I ask you one question? What

What was it like seeing Principia Mathematica, you know, Newton's famous book right at the beginning of the show? It was very, very cool. I will say it was not the best thing I saw there. What did you see? My favorite thing in the Royal Salati collections was actually the first ever book of...

cyanotype prints of British algae. This is niche. Yeah. I love it. They're just really beautiful. It's like, so cyanotype printing is you get this ink and then it's exposed to the sun and it turns blue. And anything that hasn't been exposed or is translucent is like a level of white or light blue. And so it's just this book with like page upon page of these

bits of algae that are very like beautiful strands of algae and leaves that were made. Well, I'm glad you got to see that. And it is a special place, the Royal Society Library. Kunal, thank you very much for doing all of this. It's been absolutely wonderful. Thank you for letting me embark on this little passion project. Thank you also to our wonderful correspondents, Rachel Dobbs, Kenneth Kukie, Emily Steinmark, Jeff Carr and Abby Bertix for sharing their wisdom on today's programme.

And thank you for listening to Babbage. Don't forget that if you want to listen to us and all of The Economist's specialist weekly podcasts every week, you'll need to become a subscriber. Treat yourself this Christmas. For your best Economist podcast plus subscription offer, click on the link in the show notes or search the web for Economist podcasts. Babbage is produced by Kunal Patel and Jason Hoskin, with mixing and sound design by Nico Rofast. The executive producers are Jason Palmer and Marguerite Howell.

I'm Alok Chah and in London, this is The Economist.

So discover how TeamViewer can make work, work better, wherever it happens. Learn more at TeamViewer.com slash work better.