We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode How the civil service system changed American government

How the civil service system changed American government

2025/1/14
logo of podcast On Point | Podcast

On Point | Podcast

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
D
David Lewis
D
Donald Moynihan
J
Jacqueline Simon
K
Kash Patel
M
Meghna Chakrabarty
P
Philip K. Howard
R
Russell Vogt
V
Vivek Ramaswamy
Topics
Meghna Chakrabarty: 本期节目讨论了美国公务员制度的历史和现状,以及候任总统特朗普计划进行的改革。特朗普计划解雇数万名政府工作人员,并用效忠于他的人员取代他们。这引发了人们对美国公务员制度未来走向的担忧。 Donald Moynihan: 1883年之前的美国联邦政府运作模式是“战利品制度”,总统可以将职位分配给其政治支持者,这导致了腐败和低效的政府运作。内战后,政府失职和浪费的后果日益凸显,促使人们呼吁改革。詹姆斯·加菲尔德总统遇刺事件进一步推动了公务员制度改革。 《彭德尔顿法案》要求所有公务员职位申请者参加资格考试,以此引入基于能力的选拔机制。该法案的实施减少了政府腐败,提高了政府效率。然而,美国的行政部门仍然保留着相当程度的政治色彩,存在大量的政治任命职位。 1978年的《公务员改革法案》旨在使公务员制度现代化,并减少政治化。然而,绩效考核的客观性难以保证,且绩效奖励机制未能有效实施,导致许多公务员获得优秀绩效评级,缺乏问责制。 目前,联邦政府面临着吸引和留住年轻人才的挑战。我们需要在现代化和非政治化的前提下进行改革,以提高政府效率和服务质量。 Vivek Ramaswamy: 我认为应该解雇75%的华盛顿联邦公务员,因为他们根本不配拥有这份工作。 Kash Patel: 我将对华盛顿特区的政府官员进行大规模调查,为我们的总统清除障碍。 Russell Vogt: 我们希望通过改革让公务员感到恐惧,从而影响他们的工作积极性。 Philip K. Howard: 现行的公务员制度缺乏问责制,难以解雇表现不佳的员工,这已经演变成了一种反绩效制度。 Jacqueline Simon: 大幅裁减联邦公务员并不会显著减少政府开支,反而会削弱政府保护公民的能力,例如食品安全监管。公众往往忽视联邦公务员为公民所做的工作。 David Lewis: 美国宪法对联邦政府官僚机构的运作机制没有详细规定,其发展主要依靠政治决策。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

WHY did the United States establish a civil service?

The U.S. established a civil service to address the rampant corruption and inefficiency of the "spoils system," where government jobs were awarded based on political patronage rather than merit. This system led to unqualified individuals holding important positions, hindering effective governance. The assassination of President James Garfield by a disgruntled office seeker further fueled public outrage and demands for reform, culminating in the Pendleton Act of 1883.

How did the Pendleton Act of 1883 change the federal government?

The Pendleton Act introduced merit-based selection for federal jobs through qualifying exams. While it didn't immediately abolish the spoils system, it marked a turning point by establishing the principle of merit as a basis for public sector employment. This led to a gradual shift towards a professionalized civil service, reducing corruption and improving government performance.

How did the federal workforce change after the Civil War?

The federal workforce grew significantly after the Civil War, as the government expanded its role in response to societal changes like mass immigration and urban growth. This expansion highlighted the inadequacies of the spoils system, as the demand for competent government officials increased.

How does the size of the U.S. federal workforce compare to other countries?

While the U.S. government is large, its federal workforce, comprising about 1.9% of the civilian workforce, is proportionally smaller than many peer nations. However, the U.S. relies heavily on private contractors, creating a "shadow workforce" that contributes to federal services.

What were some of the problems with the "spoils system"?

The spoils system was plagued by corruption, inefficiency, and lack of accountability. Unqualified individuals often occupied key positions, leading to poor governance. Examples include the mismanagement of the veterans' pension system and the collector of the Port of New York embezzling millions. The system also placed a heavy burden on presidents, who spent significant time dealing with job seekers.

WHY was Chester A. Arthur an unlikely champion of civil service reform?

Chester A. Arthur was a product of the spoils system, having held the patronage-based position of collector of the Port of New York. His rise to the presidency was linked to powerful pro-spoils figures. However, the assassination of President Garfield, attributed to a disgruntled office seeker, shifted public opinion and pressured Arthur to embrace reform.

What are the primary functions of the majority of federal civilian employees?

Approximately 71% of non-postal federal civilian employees work in areas related to national security, homeland security, or veterans affairs. These areas generally receive broad public support and consequently, larger budgets.

What is Schedule F, and why is it controversial?

Schedule F is an executive order that would allow a president to reclassify certain civil service positions as political appointments. This would effectively strip these employees of their job protections and make them easier to fire, raising concerns about politicizing the civil service and undermining its nonpartisan nature.

Chapters
Before 1883, the US federal government operated under the "spoils system," where winning presidents awarded jobs to political supporters, regardless of qualifications. This led to corruption, poor performance, and a lack of accountability. The system was especially problematic after the Civil War, as government grew and the consequences of its failures became more severe.
  • Spoils system: "to the victor belong the spoils", presidents awarded jobs to supporters
  • Corruption and poor performance marked this era
  • Government was small enough for the president to know most employees
  • Post-Civil War growth led to increased issues

Shownotes Transcript

The Pendleton Act of 1883 established a non-partisan civil service. President-elect Donald Trump says he’ll upend the law, firing non-partisan employees and replacing them with loyalists. We'll look at how the U.S. came to have a civil service in the first place.