The spirit of innovation is deeply ingrained in America, and Google is helping Americans innovate in ways both big and small. The Department of Defense is working with Google to help secure America's digital defense systems, from establishing cloud-based zero-trust solutions to deploying the latest AI technology. This is a new era of American innovation. Find out more at g.co slash American innovation.
The Ego Power Plus Savings Event is on at Lowe's. Right now, get a free select Ego 56-volt battery with purchase of a select trimmer, blower, or mower kit. That's a $299 value. Plus, shop today for new and exclusive items you need for your lawn. So get ready for spring with the latest in innovation from Ego, the number one rated brand in cordless outdoor power. Only at Lowe's. We help, you save. Offer valid through 416. Selection varies by location. While supplies last.
This is On Point. I'm Meghna Chakrabarty. The U.S. Merchant Marine is often referred to as the fourth arm of defense alongside the Army, Navy, and Air Force. These are civilian mariners who are critical to sea-based commerce during peacetime and essential for the secure transport of military supplies during wartime.
And the U.S. needs more of them. A lot more. As early as 2017, the Maritime Administration found that the shortage of mariners was significant enough that the nation could not sustain full activation of what's known as the Ready Reserve Force and commercially operated vessels to meet sealift needs. Then-U.S. Maritime Administrator Rear Admiral Ann Phillips speaking with the American Maritime Podcast last March.
We already know there's a mariner shortfall in 2017 pre-COVID. A study was done by the Maritime Administration that showed that over the course of a six-month stand-up, similar to Desert Storm, we were short about 1,800 mariners. Then came COVID. Mariners found themselves stranded. They were not able to leave their ships. They didn't get reliefs. They were stranded overseas in shipyards. They were stranded other places in ports.
People began to leave the industry by voting with their feet, and it became much harder and much more challenging. Well, President Donald Trump has his eye on the American shipping industry. Just last month, in his address to Congress, Trump announced an executive order aimed at reviving U.S. shipbuilding and cutting China's global dominance of the maritime industry.
To boost our defense industrial base, we are also going to resurrect the American shipbuilding industry, including commercial shipbuilding and military shipbuilding. And for that purpose, I am announcing tonight...
that we will create a new office of shipbuilding in the White House and offer special tax incentives to bring this industry home to America where it belongs. We used to make so many ships. We don't make them anymore very much, but we're going to make them very fast, very soon. There's just one small detail. Where will we find the mariners to crew all of these new ships?
As Captain John Conrad on the industry website GCaptain.com writes, quote, military sealift command plans to sideline as many as 19 naval support ships already because there are not enough qualified Americans to crew them. The Trump administration's aggressive focus on ship building could deepen the crisis, end quote.
So the merchant marine is another one of those job sectors that if you're not directly connected to it, you probably don't think about it that much or maybe even at all. However, they are essential to the commercial and security operations of the entire nation. So if this mariner shortage continues, we all may be feeling its impacts eventually.
So we want to understand what's going on and how to fix this today. And Sal Mercogliano joins us to do that. He's associate professor of history at Campbell University and an adjunct professor with the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. He also hosts the What's Going On With Shipping channel on YouTube. Professor Mercogliano, welcome to On Point. Thank you for having me. Can you tell me a little bit more about your own qualifications as a merchant mariner for the United States?
Sure. I was a graduate of one of the six state maritime academies, the New York Maritime Academy, SUNY New York Academy.
And I sailed for the U.S. Navy's Military Sealift Command, which is the largest employer of merchant mariners in the world. I then worked ashore for them, chartering vessels and operating vessels for them. And then I did what many merchant mariners did and swallowed the anchor and came ashore. Swallowed the anchor. But it's forever a part of you, right? So I hear, I understand you hold a merchant marine deck officer license, unlimited tonnage, second mate. What does that mean?
Yeah. As a graduate of one of the state maritime academies, you will graduate with a Coast Guard credential. In my case, it was a deck officer. At the time, it was a third mate, either a third mate or a third assistant engineers. And then you advance up through the ranks by gathering sea time and taking exams. So I have a second mate unlimited, meaning I can sail in the position as second officer on any ship around the world, regardless of tonnage, along with a limited master's license.
Cool. Okay. It's cool. I have to say, I'm just, I'm going to blurt that out a lot of times during this hour. I have a close family friend who captained an LNG tanker for many decades. So you, can you tell me a little bit more, just kind of broadly, about the U.S. Merchant Marine? Like, what do mariners do?
Sure. I mean, mariners operate the commercial vessels for the United States. Every ship on the world's oceans, 100,000 ships sail the world's oceans, are registered in different countries. The U.S. currently has the 21st largest merchant marine in the world. And to operate those vessels, you have to be a U.S. citizen. But more importantly, you have to have the credentials to do it. And that usually means one of two paths.
Either you go through what's called the unlicensed route, you work your way up from the bottom ranks from an unlicensed mariner up into the officer's rank, or you attend either the Federal Maritime Academy, the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point, or one of the six state schools, Michigan, California, Texas, New York, Maine, Massachusetts, etc.
And then you can become a licensed deck officer or engineer. And then, like I said, you can work your way up. The problem we've been encountering is that while we're producing a lot of deck officers and engineers for vessels, not a lot of them are taking the path and going to sea.
Okay, I'm going to come back to that because that's always the heart of the conversation. But again, part of my goal here for this hour is to help people understand what the U.S. Merchant Marine does because I do actually think it's quite invisible to a lot of Americans and we want to change that. So when you say these are U.S., on the commercial side, it's U.S. flagged commercial ships, meaning is that like anything from, and please do correct me if I'm wrong, like a tug to all the way to obviously container vessels? Yeah.
It could be anything from fishing boats off in the Bering Sea, as you would see in Deadly's Catch, to operating large lakers up on the Great Lakes. It could be the tug and barge system you see going past your house on the Ohio or the Mississippi River. And it can be ocean-going vessels, container ships, tankers that travel the world's ocean. What merchant mariners are, they're kind of like the airline pilots of ships.
They get certified and credentialed by the U.S. Coast Guard, and then they operate them in a commercial commercial environment. I should also note that the largest employer of merchant mariners, as I mentioned before, is the U.S. Navy's Military Sealift Command.
One out of five vessels in the U.S. Navy, there's roughly 300 vessels in the Navy. Sixty of them are crewed and operated by merchant mariners. These tend to be auxiliary vessels, the ships that carry fuel, ammunition, and do the underway replenishment. They are the ones that refuel vessels at sea. So on that point, I just want to highlight the historic importance of the merchant marine to the United States military because I was reading yesterday that in the Second World War,
About a quarter million civilian merchant mariners served as part of the U.S. military, called up. And over the course of the Second World War, almost 10,000 of them lost their lives because they were doing that, just that dangerous work you were talking about, about assisting, refueling, resupplying naval ships at that time in the middle of a war.
It's true. If you look at the role of the Merchant Marine throughout history, besides being literally the second law ever written by the U.S. Congress dealt with the Merchant Marine, actually dealt with tariffs of all things that's happening today, but it dealt with commercial Merchant Marine. And throughout the U.S. Navy's history, the Merchant Marine has been essential. In the early wars, they served as privateers, kind of private men of war, officers.
kind of supplanting or, excuse me, reinforcing the U.S. Navy. But in World War II, you saw the merchant marines suffer egregious losses, 733 ships, about 10% of all U.S. merchant ships were sunk, and about one out of every two points, it's about 2.6% casualty rate for merchant mariners. We went from a merchant marine of 25,000 mariners up to 250,000 mariners. And as you note,
about 10,000 of them died. And many of them died right off the shores of the United States. If you want to go to a World War II battlefield, you don't have to travel to Europe or Asia. You can go right off the coast of the United States and find sunken ships on both the East and West coasts. Hmm.
Well, so as you said, the Merchant Marine and its importance to the country dates back to the very founding of the nation, even the Revolutionary War, if we want to be precise about things. So, I mean, in this day and age, though, is it a good job? I mean, at the various ranks that one can serve in the Merchant Marine?
It has been a good job. And like many other jobs, it's kind of lagged behind in its pay salary. The big issue is the type of job it entails. I mean, you sign on to a ship and you can be on that ship anywhere from a month to four months, sometimes even longer. So it's very disjointed. It's very hard to have a stable family life back
home because of the nature, particularly those who sail with the U.S. Navy's Military Sealift Command. That tends to be the one that involves the most amount of sea time. So it's a lot of time away. And, you know, ships are just now starting to catch up with technology that allows communication. So, for example, the biggest innovation on ships recently, if you ask merchant mariners, is Starlink.
the ability to be connected. Lots of times you sail off from the coast of land and you don't have communication again until you step foot on land, which could be weeks at a time. Why are they only catching up just now? It's a good question. Uh, largely it's money. Uh, obviously it's a business and, you know, business deals with cutting costs at all times. And, and crew hasn't been that issue, uh, because we've had kind of a, a surge of merchant mariners, uh,
We've had enough merchant mariners for the unions to pull from. There really hasn't been a big issue to really take care of mariners. That has changed. And one of the things we're seeing right now is shipping unions, shipping companies are doing everything they can to improve the life for mariners and retain them. And that's not just in the United States merchant marine. That's worldwide. What Admiral Phillips was talking about was a global phenomenon, not just the United States.
When you were working aboard ship, I guess mostly in the 90s, how long would you be at sea at times?
I sailed for a military sailor's command, and we were really doing long sea terms. I mean, the very first ship I sailed on, I was on for 11 months. So it was a long time. And usually they were doing about six months at sea at a time and then coming off for maybe about a month or two. The norm in the industry today is about one on, one off. So if you're doing a month or two months, you'll get one or two months off.
The exception, again, is military seal of command, which tends to operate a little bit longer because it operates under federal leave policies.
Well, we are speaking today with Professor Sal Mercogliano. He's an adjunct professor at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy and an associate professor of history at Campbell University. Also host of the What's Going On With Shipping YouTube channel. And Professor Mercogliano, when we come back, obviously we're going to dive deep. I'm sorry. I'm trying to stay away from the maritime puns, but I can't help it. We're going to dive deep into what's causing the shortage in merchant mariners and what we can do to fix it. This is On Point. On Point.
Support for On Point comes from Indeed. You just realized that your business needed to hire someone yesterday. How can you find amazing candidates fast? Easy, just use Indeed. There's no need to wait. You can speed up your hiring with Indeed.
So, Professor McCogliano, when did this happen?
knowledge of the shortage of merchant mariners first start surfacing? Back in the 80s, that's where we saw a really precipitous drop in the number of vessels that were sailing due to a series of policy decisions made. And we're seeing that reflected today with decisions by the Trump administration about creating an office of shipbuilding and the recent U.S. Trade Representative Section 301 report
on Chinese practices, we saw the merchant marine begin this drop. And so if you look at 1990, for example, at the time of the Persian Gulf War, we had about 450 ships that were involved or flagged in the U.S. merchant marine. These are ships over a thousand gross tons. Today, we're sitting at about 190 vessels.
And so this has been a kind of just slow, gradual decline that's been taking place. But as Admiral Phillips noted in your previous set, uh,
One of the reasons that we've seen this really get exasperated more than anything else was COVID. COVID created this moment in global shipping where merchant mariners either got stuck on their ships or got stuck not being able to get to their ships. And when you cause a disruption like that, it led to a lot of mariners deciding to leave. And there are a lot of other opportunities out there now. The wages for mariners hasn't really kept up.
as we've seen inflation take hold. And so for especially those in the entry positions, there's a lot of decisions made that I don't want to be away from home months at a time when I can get a job working somewhere else, particularly an engineer who can work in a power plant versus being on a ship out in the high seas gone for two to four months at a time. So we need to make the industry or the career much more attractive, right? I mean, so are these things changeable?
The pay, you already said that in terms of the aboard ship time, that's changed pretty significantly. What do you think are the main obstacles standing in the way of recruiting more merchant mariners now?
I think it's one of the things that you mentioned at the very beginning. It's a untold, hidden career path. Most people know very little about it. They don't even know it exists. For many people, it is a golden opportunity to advance. I mean, you can go to one of the state maritime academies online.
You can go to the Federal Merchant Marine Academy, which has billets open nearly every year for nothing. And you can get a career that will give you a six-figure salary very quickly. And more importantly, if you accrue debt, you can pay that off very quickly. It's just this is an industry that has really hidden below the radar. And it has a lot to do with the industry itself. It doesn't like to be in the limelight because usually whenever you talk about ships –
it tends to be a disaster. It tends to be something has gone wrong. And so they tend to shy away. And now they're reversing that. You know, I talk a lot with the maritime unions who recruit mariners and they're having to go out for the very first time, many of these mar, these unions to recruit new members. This has been something that hasn't happened in the past. Usually they're turning people away. That's not the case right now. And so I think
Education and more importantly, using new tools like social media to really demonstrate what a career in the merchant marine is all about needs to be done. Because it does seem like all the things you're saying make it really attractive. A, I don't know. I'm kind of an adventure loving person. It seems like an adventure. You could you said you could go to a merchant marine academy for free almost. Yeah.
For the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy is actually a federal academy just the same as West Point is and just the same as Annapolis. And even the state schools, which are, you know, I would argue not the most expensive schools to go to. But if you look at the return on investment that they have and the job placement afterwards, you can very quickly, you know, rid yourself of any sort of student debt with the jobs that are available to you. But going back to the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, to be clear, if you get accepted –
You don't have to pay for it. You don't. And you do have a service requirement for the military for a reserve commission. But if you sail actively on your license –
You can waive that. And I think, you know, one of the things that has changed too for merchant mariners, and I think this is another issue is, is that, you know, the job of the merchant Marine has changed a bit, you know, back in the day that it's, it's kind of been romanced. You go to many ports, you sit there and you can go visit today. It's much more businesslike you pull into port and ships do not want to stay in port very long because they lose money doing that. They want to come in, they want to offload and they want to go out. So it's a very high tempo of operation. It is a, a,
a type of operation with very small crews on board. Whereas you may see an aircraft carrier with three to 4,000 people on board. You get a ship larger than an aircraft carrier, a ship like the ever given that got stuck in the Suez back in 2021 at a crew of 22 on board. That was a 1300 foot long ship. 22. Holy cow. 22, very minimal. And those 22 are working in different parts of the ship.
I mean, it's quite, quite frequent. You just see people during mealtimes. And so it is a little bit isolating. And that's why it was so important to start seeing the advent of Starlink on ships so that people can have communication. It was a very solitary life. And for some, they like that. Others like the idea of going to these ports and seeing things. But even, you know, in U.S. ports, for example, when foreign ships come in,
The mariners aren't usually allowed off the vessel. We saw that with the Dolly in Baltimore. That crew was restricted to the vessel because they didn't have visas. So they were literally restricted either to the vessel or to small areas of the ports where there may be a bar or an entertainment center for them to go to, but very little for them to do going out beyond the gates. They're just not allowed.
Now, I definitely hear that about the potential isolation, right? Because, I mean, a 1,300-foot vessel is massive, and there's only, what, like you said, 22, 20-ish people that could be crewing these ships.
But on the other hand, what does it say about the nature of the job that it takes so few people to crew what I presume are some pretty complex maritime systems? Does it mean that the people on board have to know a lot about different aspects about how to run the ship or is it that the ships are that highly automated you can have a few crew members?
No, I mean, these crews are highly trained. When you look at the curriculum at Maritime Academies and you look at the jobs that are required by the mariners on board, they have to be absolutely self-sufficient. They have to be able to do repairs. They have to be able, should there be an accident or a fire on board, as we saw with a collision recently off the east coast of England, the ships have to be able to handle emergency situations.
So they are extremely well-trained. And one of the other issues I would argue with mariners now, it's not just the question of getting your initial license and heading out to sea. It's maintaining that license. There is a lot of requirements, a lot of kind of continuing education that needs to be done. So even though you may sail for two months and be off for two months, you may spend half that time ashore doing recredentials, recertifications, because
We have to, as a U.S. merchant mariner, abide not just by U.S. Coast Guard regulations, which are the regulatory body that certifies merchant mariners,
But you also have to meet what are called IMO, the International Maritime Organization. This is the UN shipping arm that sets requirements for all merchant mariners around the world. So you may think, OK, I'm going to have two months off. But in truth, you may have barely a month because you're going to school, you're taking tests, you have to be recertified. It's a long process. And I will also add that in the United States,
The licensing procedure, which is under the U.S. Coast Guard, the main licensing office for merchant mariners to go to sea is located in West Virginia.
And it's not exactly the most efficient organization in the world. We've got problems with getting licenses done, certifications done, because it's a fairly low priority for the U.S. Coast Guard. Okay. Well, I mean, on the one hand, we definitely want to have rather strict licensing requirements, right? We want qualified people aboard these ships. But I take your point about the efficiency of the process.
Seems like there's a lot of room for improvement there. I want to step back a little bit here, Professor McCogliano, and ask you something about
the U.S.'s position as a commercial maritime force over the past several decades. Because I had mentioned this earlier, that when President Trump announced his executive order regarding the shipping industry, it was very, very, very—or it is very, very focused on shipbuilding—
And to provide some background there, China being the biggest player on the shipbuilding scene right now, I understand that the market share for Chinese-built ships went from around 5% in the late 90s, early 2000s, to now more than 50%, and that the country controls...
What, 95% of shipping container production just for that one type of vessel. Okay, that's on the shipbuilding side, but is that sort of connected in part and parcel to a general decline in the United States shipping industry, including the mariner shortage?
I think it's a symptom of the decline because when the U.S. made a very conscious decision at the end of World War II that it was going to be a sea power, and by sea power, I mean a naval power. It really kind of deferred the issue of commercial. We did a lot of things to basically help other merchant marines around the world. So, for example, we sold a lot of the World War II vessels to repopulate merchant marines of our neighbors.
We helped create what are known as open registries, nations like Panama, Liberia, and the Marshall Islands that provide low-cost shipping. We were the nation that facilitated that. We, through the Marshall Plan, allowed countries to rebuild shipyards that had been destroyed by World War II.
We created a lot of the innovations today that we see in shipping. You know, three of the greatest innovations in global shipping today, the container, the super tanker and the mega cruise liner were all created by Americans. It was Malcolm McLean. It was Daniel Ludwig and it was Ted Aronson, who was born in Israel but became an American citizen.
Those are some of the biggest innovations. But the U.S. kind of sat there and said, listen, we we don't really care how our goods come to the country. If I'm going to Target and I got to buy a pair of pants, do I care if it came on an American ship or a Panamanian flagship with a Filipino crew? All I care about is it being cheap. And so we you know, we put kind of cost over that. And what that has done is is slowly diminished prices.
The size of the merchant Marine. And what has happened now is a realization is that we're seeing kind of a return to kind of confrontations on the high seas, the Houthi and the Red Sea, the emergence of China, as you mentioned, over the past 25 years.
And so the U.S. is sitting there going, OK, we allowed this to decline at least for the last 40 years in particularly. What can we do to start reversing that trend? It's going to take a long time to reverse it. It's taken a long time to get where we are today. It's not something you can turn around overnight. But I do think that the Trump administration and previous administrations, too, it's not just the Trump administration, have seen this and said, OK, we need to start making some decisions. Do we want to be completely dependent on?
on offshoring our commercial merchant marine. Because what that does is it makes our coastal shipping more expensive. You've heard issues with the Jones Act in the places like Puerto Rico, Alaska, and Hawaii. And then you're seeing it manifest in some really –
you know, high, high kind of visibility problems with Navy shipbuilding recently, because there's not the commercial shipbuilding to build the infrastructure to build naval vessels. Oh, interesting. OK, I'm going to come back to that in a second. But you said something which I'd love a little bit more explanation on that. Are you you're connecting? Is it the merchant mariner shortage or just the general decline in U.S.?
U.S. shipping to, like you said, those confrontations with the Houthi or piracy on the seas. Explain that. Yeah. Sure. I mean, I think you see a general, you know, downward trend in the maritime sector. And I think, you know, merchant mariners are a symptom of that. I mean, you know, who's going to go into an industry that you see the industry is not growing?
And, you know, who wants to join a dying industry? And it's not that the industry can't have potential and it can't provide great jobs. It's just that, you know, what's my future in this? Am I going to be fighting for jobs in the future? Is this going to be a job that in the long term will benefit me as it? And I think what we've seen is, you know, post-war,
Cold War, there was a very conscious decision that, listen, we won the Cold War. The freedom of the seas had been wide open. The world has benefited from global trade. I mean, if you use the same statistic you were talking about with the growth of the Chinese fleet in the year 2000, we were shipping six billion tons of cargo in the world ocean. Last year, we shipped 12 billion tons.
So, I mean, we've doubled the amount of cargo we're moving around the planet. And so, you know, we've seen a great, you know, rise in inner ocean commerce. That's why the most recent tariff announcement is such disrupting is because it has the potential to disrupt that global trade. And what we're seeing is really lots of disruptions in global trade.
We're seeing, again, the emergence of – we had piracy off the coast of Somalia back in the early 2000s. We have the Houthi now in the Red Sea. We see potential confrontations in the South China Sea. And if we're rising back to an issue of contested seas, then having a domestic maritime infrastructure, including a merchant marine, is really important. Understood. Understood.
Okay. So, again, thinking about all the people listening who don't have any kind of familiarity with the Merchant Marine, I do want to talk directly about implications of the shortage again. So on the commercial side, for example, you know, for someone living in the middle of the country, what are the implications of not having enough Merchant Mariners? Right.
Well, I mean, you can see numerous examples of this. Number one, if you're living in Washington State, for example, you're dealing with the Washington State ferry system, which requires merchant mariners. And at times we're seeing ferries not in operation. It's the largest ferry service in the U.S. because of lack of mariners.
If you're living in the central part of the United States, if we don't have mariners to man tugboats and towboats, these are the boats that push barges down the Mississippi from as far up as Minneapolis all the way down to New Orleans, and they haul the grain and the ore that are coming out of the Midwest, then your shipments aren't going to be able to be loaded onto vessels and shipped overseas.
And same thing we see on the Great Lakes when we don't have enough Great Lake endorsed mariners to sail the bulkers up on that region. This directly impacts commerce. And what we see is then issues arise like, well, maybe we should open up our inland waterways to foreign ships and foreign flags and foreign mariners. That doesn't sound like a great idea.
No, it's that potential of, well, if you open it up for shipping, then it becomes trucking, then it becomes airlines. And so really what we want to do is see the opportunities there for mariners to get jobs. And so what we're seeing is a lot of these unions and a lot of these entities and companies are working with high schools and community colleges to really introduce maritime back into the mainstream. We have an organization in the United States called the U.S. Maritime Administration. It is
It is one of the forearms of the Transportation Department. You have road, you have rail, and you have aviation. Maritime Administration is the smallest of the four. Their mission is to promote and discuss and help and assist the U.S. merchant marine, but I would argue they've been underfunded, understaffed,
and basically overwhelmed and they have not been able to do their mission, which is really discuss this issue. And that's why you see things like the ships act introduced by Senator Mark Kelly, uh, Senator from Arizona Democrat, who's also the only merchant mariner in Congress. He's a graduate of the U S merchant Marine Academy. And then, uh, Senator, uh, Kelly, uh, excuse me, uh, Senator Todd Young from Indiana Republican, uh,
This has, as you mentioned, bipartisan support. It has bi-coastal support. It has inland support. I mean, this is one of the few issues, if you ever watch a debate on shipping in the Merchant Marine in Congress, it is the exact opposite of maybe a judicial hearing, which is very contentious. Shipping has very unified support. So Senator Kelly not only was an astronaut and a naval officer, he also graduated from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy? Yes.
And his brother went to my school and was my indoctrination officer. Their twin brother, by the way. Yeah. Very unique relationship. Who knew? Well, I guess the Kellys knew and so did you. We'll be right back. This is On Point. On Point.
Before we return to our conversation about the dire shortage of U.S. merchant mariners, I just want to let you know about a show we're working on for the very near future. Obviously, with President Trump's announcements of even more tariffs, everyone's wondering about how that's going to impact just the cost of living in the United States. So we want to work on a show for next week specifically about groceries and how groceries are profitable.
What are the points in the supply chain that really have an impact on what you end up paying at the cash register at your grocery store? So we would love to hear from you. Have your prices of groceries gone up? Obviously, they went up during COVID. Have they continued to gone up? Have you noticed wild fluctuations even from day to day? What price changes, plus or minus, have shocked you the most? I mean, I don't know. You can even...
Talk to us about what's on your most recent grocery bill and how that compares specifically to, say, a month ago or a year ago. So you can send us your message by using the On Point Vox Pop app. If you don't already have it, just go to wherever you get your apps and look for On Point Vox Pop. That way you can send us a very high-quality message. Or if it's still easier for you, give us a call, 617-353-0683.
So we're talking about grocery prices next week. Today, as I mentioned, we are discussing the dire shortage of U.S. merchant mariners. And Professor Sal Mercogliano joins us today to walk us through this. And, Professor, I just wanted to also ask you again to clarify or just at least add more detail about the national security concerns regarding this shortage. Because I had mentioned earlier, much earlier in the show,
that given the shortage right now of merchant mariners, if there were to be a full activation of what's called the ready reserve force, there aren't actually enough mariners to fulfill that. Explain what that is.
Sure. So the U.S. military has several levels of commercial ships that work for them. They have ships directly employed by military seal of command. These are vessels that do underway replenishment and they're crewed by what are called civilian merchant mariners. These are merchant mariners in the direct employ of the U.S. Navy. And right now we're critically short of them. We're about fourteen hundred people.
Yeah.
Should there be a contingency where we have to activate ships and deploy the U.S. military overseas, much like we did in 1990 and 2003, you call up these reserve vessels, about 60 vessels evenly split between the east, west, and gulf coast.
Those ships are maintained in a five-day readiness status. They have a small crew on board, about nine people on board, but they need about 30 all told on board. So you need to crew them up. And what we have found is that the number of merchant mariners necessary to crew those up and not just to crew them initially, but to maintain them for six months is short. We're estimating somewhere in the range of about 1,600 mariners short of
And those mariners, those extra mariners would be pulled from the commercial merchant marine. And as the commercial merchant marine has shrunk and we're having problems crewing up just normal day-to-day operations of merchant ships, ships sailing with diesel fuel and gasoline, for example, from Corpus Christi, Texas, heading over to Port Everglades, Florida, to give South Florida their needed fuel supply.
Well, we're going to impact that. And so it is a critical, critical shortage. And should we find ourselves in a contingency, we're going to find ourselves without sufficient crews to man these vessels. And that can impact commercial shipping along the U.S. coast. I want to be clear if I'm understanding this correctly. So what you're saying is that regarding this aspect of military readiness, the United States is nowhere near ready.
No, we're not ready. We're unfortunately having to literally ship crews off certain vessels to keep our underway replenishment ships, the ships that refuel vessels at sea, going. And at the same time, if we have a contingency where we need to activate reserve vessels, we're really going to face a kind of Faustian bargain where we're going to have to steal crews off ships.
commercial vessels to crew these military vessels, and that could cause chaos in commercial markets along the United States. I mean, what you're talking about is a shortage of more than 25% of what's needed even in non-emergency times for naval support mariners.
It is critical. It is really at a critical point. It has been raised repeatedly in congressional testimonies by the commanders of the U.S. Transportation Command, the head of the Maritime Administration, the heads of the Military Sealift Command. And I will note that there are efforts to fix this. The current commander of the U.S. Navy's Military Sealift Command, an admiral by the name of Philip Sobeck, is doing stellar work to try to improve the life for the mariners.
Unfortunately, he is a very hard hurdle to overcome. He is kind of really working behind an eight ball right now, but he's trying to get ahead of it. What's the eight ball? Well, allowing the situation to get to where it is today. So I think the issue we've seen is, for example, in the military seal of command, the crews that sail the vessels operate literally on the same leave policy as someone who works for the U.S. government in Washington, D.C.,
Well, if you work on a ship for four months at a time, you know, every night when you're off off work, you don't go home. You stay on the ship and you work seven days a week. There's no weekends. Every day is Monday on a ship. It's always the same day. Whereas that federal employee has weekends off, holidays off. They can take leave when they want, make it a snow day here or there.
That's not the case for the Mariner. And so that has created a large problem for retaining Mariners, especially in that critical military seal of command, those national defense ships. We swing wildly in this conversation, Professor, from look at all the opportunities you could have if you became a U.S. merchant Mariner to...
It's not as good as a federal job, but you would be, you know, at the beck and call of the United States Navy, for example. So, I mean, I guess that's what the truth is, right? It swings wildly between different points. But let me ask you, Leski, I just want to obviously state for the record that this shortage has been going on under multiple administrations, right? So there's not really one place to point the finger.
But given that, did you want to say something about that? No, I think you're exactly right. And if I could just add one thing, you know, I talk about the difficulty in sailing, for example, on an underway replenishment with the U.S. Navy because of the time at sea. It is the most exciting job I ever had in my life. The idea of taking a ship and sailing it alongside an aircraft carrier at 140 feet.
at 13 knots, about 15 miles an hour while pumping a million gallons of fuel an hour. There's very few rushes in the world that you get better than that. It challenges you as a mariner. It's some of the most precise navigating and engineering work you'll ever do.
And so that's that's the appeal of it. OK, again, I just have to say it sounds so cool. But but I do want to focus for for a minute or two on the fact on what the current administration is doing or could be doing, because they're the ones in charge right now. And I was just reading in some of the the maritime sort of industry press that.
that in terms of oversight of U.S. maritime activities, that this too has sort of fallen victim to doge cuts. Like I'm saying that nine federal committees that advise the Coast Guard on maritime issues have basically been told that they're being paused indefinitely by the Department of Homeland Security. Do you know about that? Do you want to talk about that?
Yeah, those are largely safety committees that were being put on hold. So we've seen that happen across the board with many things. I will note that a lot of the committees that have the kind of more kind of granular day-to-day operation are still in service. These were seen as kind of really overarching committees that are dealing more with long-term policy and safety issues.
So I think one of the things that we've been seeing here is the irony is we're seeing an administration right now that's talking about a lot of cuts. But at the same time, there are exceptions that have been done for merchant mariners, for example, to allow them to be retained in the fleet. So when you had those big announcements about what you're –
bullet point five things and, and, you know, do you want to leave the government? That didn't apply to Mariners. So, cause the, the critical need that was done there. So it is a bit of a mixed message. I will agree with that, that we're having a bit of a mixed message on that. However,
One of the things that I think is really important is the attention that has been drawn to maritime. In 2022, we saw the Federal Maritime Commission, which oversees international trade, be given more power under the Ocean Shipping Reform Act. And now with the Ships Act, which we mentioned earlier, we're going to see even more of that included in that Ships Act is a priority.
program to enhance merchant marine training and to get more people involved into the industry. But I do want to just be specific on what the Doge-related cuts were to these advisory committees. So in January, after President Trump was sworn in, Benjamin Huffman, who was acting secretary of DHS then, ordered the termination of committees that, again, had worked with the Coast Guard,
Forming inspections, regulations and investigations of U.S. vessels, credentialing and licensing and training of mariners, Great Lakes pilotage, that kind of stuff. And in more detail about mariners specifically, one of the committees is the National Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee, which advises on matters regarding training, qualification, licensing, certification and furthering.
fitness of mariners, and the National Merchant Marine Medical Advisory Committee. I mean, none of these things can actually help the problem, right?
It doesn't help the problem, but I can't note from experience talking to members of this committee, they have voiced many issues over the years and they feel like that they haven't been heard either. So I'm not exactly sure how much the committees were really moving the ball, so to speak, on this. I think that there has been such kind of really, you know, kind of overcoming the inertia has been very difficult recently.
to make changes, especially on the credentialing, the licensing, the health certificates. We're running about six months behind in getting health certificates for our merchant mariners to be able to report on board ships. This is something those committees have been talking about for a long time. So I wish the committees had more power than they did. I can't help but to think that this is just so –
Maybe I should just be very understanding because there's – government tends to do this regardless of administration. But it's just utterly bizarre to me that something as important as shipping –
let alone the military support aspect of merchant mariners. Something as important as this has been allowed to wither on the vine as much as it has. I mean, does it really just all link back to what you said earlier, that it's just a matter of money, that people in the commercial sector, leaders in the commercial sector said, well, hey, we can make more money if we don't have as many U.S. licensed merchant mariners working these ships? Yeah.
I think it deals a lot with the fact that this is a very bifurcated industry. I mean, everyone in the industry has their own kind of little area. And so if you're dealing with shipbuilders, they're shipbuilders. If you have the maritime unions, you have the unions. And they don't tend to communicate very well together. One of the things that's allowed me to develop a YouTube channel to talk about this is that I look at the industry holistically. And there's not a lot of people who look at the overall industry holistically.
and really can call balls and strikes and figure out, you know, okay, this is what we need to benefit the industry, not just your own little sector, but everything.
And unfortunately, in the U.S. government, there really isn't. The past maritime administrators, and I've known them all, have been very much hamstrung in their ability to really articulate overarching positions. I mean, we haven't had a true national maritime strategy. I mean, we've seen issues come to the forefront. I mean, the Dali in Baltimore, the supply chain crisis.
A lot of those issues were already known to be a problem. The pilots in Baltimore had warned about the bridge. The Federal Maritime Commission had warned about the supply chain crisis years beforehand. Unfortunately, for the maritime sector, which doesn't get a lot of attention, and that's why I thank you for doing what you're doing today, it really needs to be brought to the forefront, and it needs good leadership. And we're just starting to see that really emerge right now. Okay, so just a couple more quick things. You did mention the Jones Act before. Yeah.
which every once in a while has its moment in the public consciousness. Tell me more about what that has to do with the shortage.
Well, the Jones Act initially, when it was passed in 1920, was really a national maritime strategy, something that I hop on quite a bit. I think we need something encompassing like that. It was actually a very broad policy. It dealt with many of the issues we see today. It dealt with the situation in World War I where our foreign shipping was in the hands of foreign ships. We didn't have much control over it. And during World War I,
We saw a situation where our imports and exports couldn't get to the country. And so we passed this very holistic, big, huge, massive policy. Today, most people associate the Jones Act with the coastal trade. This is the trade. This is what requires a U.S. owned, U.S. flagged, U.S. built, U.S. crude ship.
to move cargo between U.S. ports. And so this has an effect on particularly our non-contiguous parts of the United States, Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico. I think we need Jones Act reform. I think Jones Act reform is needed. I think people who ship on U.S. flag vessels should be discounted in their shipments for that. They should be a tax write-off of some kind because it is more expensive to use U.S. anything, whether it's a ship, a plane, a car, a truck.
It's more expensive. But what I don't agree with is the idea that the reason we find ourselves in this situation is solely because of the Jones Act and the fix for this is repeal. I think that's too simplistic of an answer and it misses a lot of the underlying factors that have contributed to this decline that we see. We need a much more complex fix to fix a very complex problem. And unfortunately, that doesn't always communicate very well. Okay, if you had a magic wand-
What would be the first two things that you would want to change in order to build back up the ranks of the U.S. Merchant Marine? Well, I think one of the most important things is to entice cargo onto U.S. flagships. And to do that, there are very several ways you can do that. You can encourage people to ship on U.S. flagships by offering, like I said, those discounts. Cargo is king in commercial shipping. And if you don't have cargo, you don't have ships and you don't have mariners.
So you've got to generate that. And I think, you know, by using discounts, especially in an administration like this, that's using tariffs, it's like, hey, you know what? If you haul it on a U.S. ship, you don't have to pay those tariffs. That would be a very enticing thing that all of a sudden made U.S. ships look very attractive. And then the other thing I would do is really enhance the education and the information distribution on the career paths that are available to
to this. You know, the Seafarers International Union, which is the union that trains the unlicensed crew members, the ABs, the able-bodied seamen, the oilers and the wipers, they have a training program that's completely free. You can go to their training facility in Maryland. You can get your credentials. You can get a job. It is a fantastic education opportunity.
And it pays for itself multiple times over. And we need to do that. We need to get more outreach from the maritime academies to local schools and just make people know that this is an opportunity that's available to them for a great career path. Yeah. Well, as I said a little earlier, a very close family friend of mine, in fact, he's like my uncle, Captain William Good. He served as a U.S. merchant mariner for almost half a century, and he taught me some beautiful maritime phrases, including...
Fair winds and following seas. Professor Mercogliano, thank you so much for joining us. Magna, thanks so much for having me today. And Professor Mercogliano is also host of the What's Going On With Shipping channel on YouTube. Check it out. I'm Magna Chakrabarty. This is On Point.