We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Should offensive species names be changed? The organisms that honour dictators, racists and criminals

Should offensive species names be changed? The organisms that honour dictators, racists and criminals

2024/12/16
logo of podcast Nature Podcast

Nature Podcast

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
B
Benjamin Thompson
C
Carolina Reyes Puig
D
Darren Naish
E
Erin McGee
H
Hemi Whanga
H
Henry Gee
R
Ricardo Rocha
S
Sandy Knapp
T
Theo Delic
Topics
Benjamin Thompson: 我将探索科学中的命名,包括其方法、后果、问题和可能的解决方案。 Henry Gee: 拉丁名在科学中至关重要,因为它确保了全球科学家对同一物种的理解一致。物种命名的拉丁文规则已经放宽,现在可以使用任何语言,只要符合该语言的词源学规则即可。 Sandy Knapp: 林奈的双名法系统对植物命名做出了巨大贡献,并被广泛采用。在18世纪早期,植物和动物的命名很冗长,林奈的双名法系统简化了这一过程。林奈的双名法系统由属名和种名两部分组成。林奈的双名法系统虽然被广泛采用,但其命名规则在很长一段时间内并未得到规范。 Darren Naish: 命名新物种是一个复杂的过程,涉及多个步骤和潜在的失败点。在物种命名中,优先权法规定,第一个发表的名称优先于其他任何名称。命名新物种需要查阅文献,确保该物种尚未被命名;检查博物馆中的标本,以确认其独特的特征;结合解剖学和遗传学证据;向博物馆捐赠一个模式标本。对濒危物种的命名可能引发伦理争议,因为这需要杀死该物种的个体。命名新物种需要在同行评审期刊上发表论文。新物种的名称不能具有冒犯性,不能以命名者本人命名,并且应该朗朗上口。 Theo Delic: 我研究了一种生活在斯洛文尼亚洞穴中的甲虫,它的名字与希特勒有关,这引起了争议。这种甲虫的名字是“Anophthalmus hitleri”,以希特勒命名,这导致了对该物种的非法交易。如果这种甲虫的名字不是以希特勒命名,它就不会引起如此多的关注。 Ricardo Rocha: 以人物命名的物种名称(即同名物种)在非洲脊椎动物中普遍存在,并且主要与殖民强国有关。以人物命名的物种名称(即同名物种)可能产生多种负面影响,包括对个人和社会的影响。关于是否应该更改具有冒犯性的物种名称,存在许多不同的观点,需要进一步讨论。 Erin McGee: 我研究过一种名为Scalloporus yarivai的蜥蜴,它的名字是以一位曾盗窃土著遗骸的人命名的,这让我感到矛盾。以具有负面历史的人物命名的物种名称,即使只是名称,也会带来负面影响。在自然界中遇到种族主义历史会让人感到沮丧。 Carolina Reyes Puig: 在拉丁美洲,以人物命名的物种名称(即同名物种)被认为是有用的,因为它可以帮助筹集资金用于保护工作。我们以一位为厄瓜多尔土著人民权利而斗争的女性的名字命名了一种新的蜥蜴物种,这有助于提高人们对该物种及其栖息地的认识。来自全球南方的研究人员认为,以人物命名的物种名称(即同名物种)对他们很有用,而许多呼吁停止使用这种名称的呼声来自全球北方。分类学是一门被低估的科学,对生物多样性丰富的国家至关重要。 Hemi Whanga: 在使用毛利语命名物种时,需要避免语言和文化上的错误。在使用当地地名命名物种时,需要考虑这些地名的历史背景。在与土著社区合作命名物种时,尊重和信任至关重要;需要建立信任关系,并尊重土著社区的自主权;需要咨询土著社区的意见,并尊重他们的文化。土著社区可能拒绝使用他们的语言或文化元素来命名物种。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why is the naming of species considered one of the most complicated things in science?

Species naming involves a complex system of rules, historical context, and global communication standards, making it a contentious and intricate process.

What is the significance of Latin in scientific species naming?

Latin ensures consistency and global understanding among scientists, as it provides a universal language for naming organisms, regardless of the researcher's native tongue.

Why are some species names considered offensive or problematic?

Many species names are eponyms honoring historical figures, some of whom were racists, dictators, or criminals, leading to debates about their appropriateness in modern science.

What is the controversy surrounding the beetle named Anophthalmus hitleri?

The beetle was named after Adolf Hitler in 1933, leading to unwanted attention and a black market trade in the insect, despite its unremarkable nature.

What are the arguments for and against changing eponymous species names?

Proponents argue that offensive names should be changed to reflect modern values, while opponents emphasize the need for stability in scientific nomenclature and the impracticality of changing millions of names.

How does the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) view the renaming of species?

The ICZN prioritizes stability in nomenclature and does not recommend renaming species unless there are formal nomenclatural reasons, such as a new priority name being discovered.

What recent changes have been made to plant nomenclature to address offensive names?

In 2023, the International Botanical Congress voted to change plant names containing racial slurs, with a committee established to flag future problematic names starting from 2026.

What are the challenges of using indigenous names for species?

The process requires careful consultation with indigenous communities, as naming can imply ownership or cultural missteps, and not all species have local names.

Why do some researchers argue that eponymous names should remain?

Eponyms can serve as tools for conservation, attracting funding and attention to endangered species and their habitats, especially in regions with limited resources.

What is the law of priority in species naming?

The law of priority states that the first published name for a species takes precedence, ensuring stability in nomenclature and preventing confusion among scientists.

Chapters
The episode starts by highlighting the importance of categorization in human understanding and communication, emphasizing the role of names in science. It introduces the concept of binomial nomenclature, a two-part naming system for species, and its significance in standardizing scientific communication across languages and cultures.
  • Categorization is fundamental to how humans interact with the world.
  • Binomial nomenclature standardizes scientific communication.
  • Latin names ensure clarity and consistency in identifying species.

Shownotes Transcript

Categorizing things is central to science. And there are dozens of systems scientists have created to name everything from the trenches on the sea bed to the stars in the sky.

But names have consequences — unintended or otherwise. In our new series What’s in a name we’ll explore naming in science and how names impact the world — whether that’s how the names of storms impact public safety, how the names of diseases impact patient care, or even how the names of scientific concepts can drive the direction of research itself.

In this first episode we’re looking at species names. The modern system of species naming began in the 1700s and has played a vital role in standardizing academic communication, ensuring that scientists are on the same page when they talk about an organism. However, this system is not without its issues. For example, there has been much debate around whether species with names considered offensive — such as those named after historical racists — should be changed, and what rule changes need to be made to allow this to happen.

We speak to researchers about the history of this naming system, how it’s applied and how it might evolve in the face of growing pressures.

Sources

For a full list of sources, please visit https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-04200-9)

Music credits

Premiumaudio/Pond5

Alon Marcus/Pond5

Groove Committee/Pond5

Opcono/Pond5

Erik Mcnerny/Pond5

Earless Pierre/Pond5

Richard Smithson/Triple Scoop Music/Getty Images

​​​​​​​Douglas Romayne/Triple Scoop Music/Getty Images

Sound effects via Pond5

Thick-billed Longspur/​​​​​​​Andrew Spencer) via ​​​​​​​CC BY-NC-ND 2.5)

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy) for more information.