Jan. 19, 2025 "Cutting Through the Matrix" with Alan Watt --- Redux (Educational Talk From the Past): "Leisure Versus Tunnel Vision"
02:13:52 Share

This is Melissa and today is the 19th of January 2025. I hope that you are all doing well. On the 11th, just a little over a week ago, we had our book club discussion on chapter 18 on the CTTM Telegram channel and this was really led by Lee and Lee is in Taipei, Taiwan and

And it was a good, a very good discussion. Darren from South Africa took a section. I had a section. It was quite a long talk. But even so, I was planning on making a video of it and having it up this week. But what I have done with a significant portion of at least a couple of days is work on the website, some things that I really needed to do.

to let you know about the flash drives for instance and once I got in there you see working with HTML for someone who is not a coder is... it's not fun. It's not my idea of fun at least but this needed to be done and I had a little bit of emotional support and guidance from Andrea in South Africa

who is a graphic artist and she and Darren really moderate the CTTM Book Club channel and she has made beautiful graphics for the channel advertising the upcoming discussions and she led the discussion on I think it was chapter 16

But her help has been invaluable in this process. So I'm kind of in the, well, it's a work in progress. But what you will see is that there have been changes on the website. Once I got in there, I just trimmed up a little bit of text. So the please note with the day's date on it that tells you a few things. I tried to make some of that pop out at us a little better.

and streamline it and you'll see the addition of a couple of graphics regarding the flash drives and that was done by Andrea. And there's another graphic that she did for Waiting for the Miracle which I am encouraging people to purchase because we have decided in book club that this is our next book that we'll discuss and we're going to get going on that in March.

Prince from Las Vegas. I've done a real history with him a couple of times and I've mentioned him. I think Prince is a wise man. And so Prince wisely suggested when we were debating what book we should do next in book club that it should, of course, be Alan's books.

And as I was considering them, I thought, I think we should do Waiting for the Miracle first, because the Cutting Through series of books, it's a different way of reading. As Alan would say, it's nonlinear thinking, and they're so dense with new concepts and thinking outside the box. I thought, well, waiting is maybe what we should start with, Waiting for the Miracle. And

Waiting for the Miracle is really the edited book form of the talks that Alan had with Jackie Petru on Sweet Liberty. And those were, those particular talks used in that book are 1998 to 2000. And Jackie suggested to him, I'm pretty sure that it was in one of the

talks that's featured in the book it may have just been another Jackie interview but Jackie said Alan you should write a book this was before the cutting through books and he said no I'm not gonna do that you know shot it down but as it turned out he did so I think sequentially it'll be good to start with waiting for the miracle and then get into the cutting through books so there you go please visit the website see that and that is the main one

www old-fashioned thing because we all know that now don't we cutting through the matrix.com and you will see some of the little changes and hopefully improvements that I am making and one thing that I have done is updated

the order form. Now I just want to say that if you tell me what you want via email, you really don't have to print out an order form and send it to me. But I've updated the order form, which is the U.S. version and the Canadian version. And that gives you a really good description of what you're going to find on each flash drive. So it may be something that you want to refer to until I can have an easier to access

description for you this will do. I also made a new flash drive page and that gives some basics. As I said this is a work in progress and I'm sure that over the next few weeks I'm going to be able to continue to improve it. Now back to the video that I didn't edit for book club. Lee in Taipei, Taiwan

was speaking to us from a 7-11 in the middle of the night. When we started the recording, it was 2 a.m., and I just thought that that was remarkable dedication to the conversation about the book, and this has been one of the things that

has been most enjoyable for me is people from all over the world who want to participate in reading Carol Quigley's Tragedy and Hope and talking about it. And so I am going to be making a video for that long discussion that we had on Chapter 18 and posting it this upcoming week. The next book club book

gathering is going to be on Saturday the 1st of February at the Telegram CTTM channel and Graham is doing the heavy lifting on this one and Graham I did a real history with G and G Graham and Gabriella and Graham is from Scotland but he lives with Gabriella and

in Germany and they've been together many many years and they're lovely. So he's going to do a couple of sections and I am taking a section and then Dan in Canada is doing a section and I had a great conversation with Dan the other day just about the book and this chapter and some ideas that he had for covering it and

And it was a great conversation because he, when he was young, he, well, he was raised in Sudbury and I never met him, but it was one of these small world conversations where we realized that there were a lot of connections and people that we knew in common. And that was fun.

So that is the book club. Chapter 19, which is, let's see here. I did not have this open, so this is the noisy part where I flip and look for it. It is chapter 19, the new era, 1957 to 1964.

And that is covering the growth of nuclear stalemate, the disintegrating superblocks. Those superblocks are Latin America and the Far East, and then the eclipse of colonialism. So join us for that. Also in the kind of book reading things that we do, I will be speaking with Nick at the end of this month.

the 30th, I believe, and we are going to be covering the science fiction novel from like 1921 entitled We by Yevgeny Zamyatin. And I haven't started reading that. You'll hear why later on, but I will be reading that, of course, in the next couple of weeks. So that is the reading part out of the way.

I had a suggestion from someone a couple of weeks ago, like what they thought would be a good thing, a fun talk to put up around the inauguration. And the inauguration is tomorrow, the 20th of January. And they have this image of Trump as Batman and his character.

vice president Vance would be Robin. And they said, well, you know, I bet Alan has talked about Batman and Robin, and you could probably put something fun together there. And so I did a bit of scouring through the topics and things that Alan covered. And sure enough, I did find

a few different references to Batman, but primarily they centered around some talks that he delivered in July when there was the mass shooting at the theater in Colorado. So this is July, 2012. Sorry. I don't think I gave you the year. And, uh,

It turned out that it wasn't really lighthearted, Batman and Robin, although I think that there is some good symbolism discussion in this one that I'm going to talk to you about. I am not playing it today. So I'm just going to give you a couple of highlights, including the poem. It will tie in with other things today.

that we'll hear about in the redux that I chose and symbolism is symbolism and predictive programming are some key concepts here. So this is July 24, 2012, Alan Watt cutting through the matrix live on RBN. And here is the poem, Not Safe in Your Homes. Okay. And that's spelled like Sherlock, H-O-L-M-E-S. Not safe in your homes.

Government, our savior, it'll train, coddle, and feed you. Forgive us, Homeland Security. We really, really need you.

Faces of newscasters, straight as a poker, parroting exact same stories on the Joker. World's not safe, it's terrifyingly bad. Straight-laced young men suddenly go mad. Everyone obviously needs professional guidance. Birth to death, big brother must have confidence. When everyone is PC, standardized like clones, aberrant behavior will be rectified by drones.

sinister twilight language used to cast a spell. The Joker is a jester, a comedian from hell. Sherlock would figure out why Mr. Holmes would be involved with Batman's legendary tomes. And

So one reason why I didn't choose to play this talk in its entirety is that I felt there was a lot going on here topically. Very interesting talk, and please read the transcript or listen to it. But all in all, it wasn't really covering many of the things that I was thinking about this week. However, and another reason why I chose not to play it is, I'll just say Sandy Hook's

and saying anything that might be outside the box about something that has happened. Is that vague enough for you? So...

Alan says, so in other words, we're going to see a whole bunch of slews of laws coming down the pike because as I say, it literally means they're trying to validate all their snooping on all your mails and what you look at and all your data. And they're trying to validate that you see, and they're trying to validate the fact that they've been personality profiling you for years on the computer. That is what, why, what they're doing with it. And eventually they'll,

now put it in writing and say yeah okay now it's official we've been doing it unofficially now it's official for your safety you understand so he goes on and and says he has a break there station break right at that point but he comes back and says but they do love the occult of course and the occult is a way to smack you in the mouth and show how silly you are but

But also it's part of the spell that they cast on you as well. It gets everyone chatting about it, all the strange things that are happening here. A guy who dresses like the Joker just because he has red hair. It's maybe even a wig for all we know. But the fact is it's so bizarre. It captivates the minds of the people. And then he goes on to say a few things that I don't want to get in trouble for repeating again.

There's some interesting things. The number plate of his car was 119, which is 911 backwards, obviously. And then there's ROC, which is rock, ROC. He said those that have read The Arabian Nights, of course, know that rock was the big flying monster that brought destruction upon the world. And just coincidentally, Taiwan is also known as the Republic of China, which is rock, ROC.

um so it's strange how it all ties together let's see no but rock is also the division of guess what i mean we're talking about batman here penguin books you know the penguin the other arch enemy for science fiction it's just strange how it all ties together and then you find this one here too to do with detective comics that's dc comics

And they used to call them DC Comics. Detective Comics brought in the superheroes. He said used to, but they still do. Okay, so there we go. And he starts to read this about Detective Comics. And why way back when, in 1987, DC decided to celebrate its 50 years with a special story, the Doomsday Book.

it was explained that they knew that it would be a Batman story. And I think that the person said it's dominated, he, Batman, has dominated the DC Comics since 1939, but they wanted to include other aspects, so they brought in Sherlock Holmes. And so Alan reads a little bit more. He said, so it's amazing how you've even got Batman meeting Holmes, where we have the Holmes guy who thinks he's the Joker, etc., etc.,

But as Alan is talking about the symbolism, he says symbology, and it's a cold language in symbology, of course, because it affects the psyche of the listeners. It casts a spell on them, and it does. Even if they don't understand it, it casts a kind of spell. It puts them in a limbo state where they're easily suggest themselves, and then they have to go along with the mainstream out there.

And so they're kind of repeating, nobody's safe. It's scare all these dark forces working on us. So that is that link to the audio. And I will link to the transcript. But in my mind, when my friend and this listener suggests a Batman Robin kind of theme for the inaugural, some of you might remember that Trump's to say Trump did it because, you know, they've got a team, um,

In August of last year, Trump shared some, you know, kind of photo shop of him dressed as Superman. And he was surrounded by his... And they were all dressed as DC Comics heroes. So you've got Trump and then above him is Batman. And the Batman is his vice president, Vance. And then there is...

rfk jr i'm not sure who he is musk is a cyborg or the cyborg and um let's see who else do we have tulsi gabbard is when and vivek ramaswamy is ash

So I think all that's missing is for me to figure out who Kay is. Aquaman, perhaps. Okay, so there you go. The DC comic heroes that are now headed to the White House.

Now, Vivek Ramaswamy pointed out Brahmin class educated for a certain task, obviously. And he is Elon Musk's sidekick in Doge, which is the Department of Government Efficiency. And about, it's been almost a month now, I think, but three weeks ago, there was a huge brouhaha because...

of things that and Ramaswamy and even Trump said about the visa. This is the skilled, particularly in the tech field, but the skilled visa and some interesting articles because basically just in a crude summary and things that Vivek Ramaswamy said,

Here's part of a quote he said, "American culture reiterated mediocrity over excellence for way long and he suggested that certain immigrant communities put it as superior culture that values excellence and produces wildly successful STEM graduates." And the STEM is science, technology, and maths.

This got such bad press from Elon Musk that what he seems to have done was turn sights on the UK and the gang grooming and sex trafficking of young girls. And this seemed to most people who were observing it, myself included, a pretty obvious thing.

pivot so that the bad press he was getting on the comments about the h1b visa would just kind of die down so looking and i will post too there are some other things out there that talk about the what what actually happens in a culture where there's a little bit more freedom and creativity allowed dan that i mentioned that is

going to be participating in the next chapter of the Tragedy and Hope book club discussion. Sent me an article yesterday. He said this is a good article and it quotes Alan Watt. Now I can see that I have spent a lot of time, unfortunately, I think I'll probably stop reading this as soon as I get to

the quote from Alan Watt, which is only about halfway through, and then you can read this for yourself. I also want to say that I looked up the author. This was sent to me from Zero Hedge, but it linked back to this person's substack, Joshua Stileman. And Joshua Stileman, as it turns out, is a writer at the Brownstone Institute. And the Brownstone Institute is a kind of...

libertarian, I guess you could say, institute, and it has become a nexus for dissident writers and thinkers. It has come under criticism by some people, a not favorable feature on the Brownstone Institute. I've spoken with Dr. Petra Buskins, who was invited to speak there

late last year and she is lovely and she thought everyone there was lovely. So I will let people draw their own conclusions about who is controlled opposition and what they're up to. You get a lot of this slung around the internet. Some of it can be helpful and productive. One thing just in thinking of the so-called intellectual dark web is it's a web, right?

So you always have to think for yourself and put things together as much as you can for yourself. But here is a little bit from that article, The Technocratic Blueprint, A Century in the Making, Joshua Stileman, January 15, 2025.

"Humanity will attempt to overcome its limitations and arrive at fuller fruition," declared Julian Huxley in 1957, coining the term transhumanism. By 2022, Yuval Noah Harari would announce its dark fulfillment. Now listen here because we have heard only repeatedly the first part of this Harari quote, but the whole thing is quite thought-provoking.

Humans are now hackable animals. The whole idea of free will, that's over.

Today we have the technology to hack human beings on a massive scale. Everything is being digitized, everything is being monitored. In this time of crisis you have to follow science. It's often said you should never allow a good crisis to go to waste because a crisis is an opportunity to also do good reforms that in normal times people would never agree to. But in a crisis you have no chance so you better do what we, the people who understand,

tell you to do right so that was Harari saying in a crisis you better do what we the people who understand tell you to do

Article continues, "Like Truman Burbank in the Truman Show, we inhabit a world where reality itself is increasingly engineered, and like Truman, most remain unaware of the extent of this engineering until shown the patterns. But unlike Truman's physical dome with its obvious cameras and artificial sets, our manufactured environment operates through sophisticated technological systems and invisible digital constraints.

The mechanics of this reality engineering, from media manipulation to social programming, were explored in detail in our previous analysis. Now we turn to the driving force behind this manufactured world: technocracy, the system of control that makes such reality engineering possible on a global scale.

The technocratic architecture wasn't merely passed down through institutions, it flowed through bloodlines. At the heart of this dynastic web sits Thomas Henry Huxley, known as Darwin's bulldog, who helped establish scientific materialism as the new religion while serving on the influential Rhodes Round Table.

His son, Leonard, carried this torch forward while grandsons, Aldous and Julian, became key architects of the modern world order. These weren't random connections, but rather the careful cultivation of multi-generational power networks.

The connections deepen through marriage and association. Charles Galton Darwin, grandson of Charles Darwin, wrote The Next Million Years in 1952 outlining population control through technological means. His son would later marry into the Huxley line, creating a powerful nexus of influence spanning science, culture, and governance.

This intergenerational project has evolved with technological capability where Rockefeller once declared, "We need a nation of workers

not thinkers. While building his educational information factory, today's technocrats face a different equation. As artificial intelligence eliminates the need for human labor, the focus shifts from creating compliant workers to managing population reduction, not through overt force, but through sophisticated social engineering.

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink recently made this shift explicit, explaining how AI and automation will reshape population dynamics.

In developed countries with shrinking populations, these countries will rapidly develop robotics and AI technology. The social problems that one will have in substituting humans for machines will be far easier in those countries that have declining populations.

His candid assessment reveals how technological capability drives elite agendas. As human labor becomes less necessary, population reduction becomes more desirable. Climate change messaging, declining birth rates, and the normalization of euthanasia aren't random developments but logical extensions of this evolving agenda.

In 1937, a British science fiction writer imagined a future where all human knowledge would be instantly accessible to everyone. Today we call it the Internet, but H.G. Wells saw more than just technology.

The world has a world brain to which ultimately all knowledge is to be addressed, he wrote, and it has a nervous system of road, railway, and air communication, which is already beginning to bind mankind into a whole. His vision went beyond mere information sharing.

Through the open conspiracy, he called for a movement of all that is intelligent in the world, explicitly advocating for technocratic governance by a scientific elite who would gradually assume control of society. The open conspiracy must be, from its very inception, a world movement, and not merely an English movement or a Western movement. It must be a movement of all that is intelligent in the world.

Wells here laid out this schema for a class of educated, rational individuals who would lead this global transformation. Even his fictional work, Shape of Things to Come, reads like a blueprint, particularly in its description of how a pandemic might facilitate global governance.

Now I can see that it's going to take me longer to read this than I hoped, so I'm just going to scroll. He next talks about Julian Huxley at UNESCO and a philosophy in which the world should be run by scientific world humanism.

And he cites the interview that Alan Watt has oft cited, the Mike Wallace, Aldous Huxley interview, where Huxley said that they would overwhelm the populations with rapid technological change, and this would make them lose their capacity for critical analysis. So he called this control through overwhelm.

Then he goes on to cite Zygmunt Brzezinski's Between Two Ages, describing the technotronic era marked by surveillance and quoting from Brzezinski, the technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society.

Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.

Then there's some Internet of Bodies and some Orwell and some Cecil Rose and the Round Table, some Carol Quigley and Tragedy and Hope. I mean, obviously, we know that this writer has listened to a fair bit of Alan Watt. He goes from the Round Table and Chatham House and the Council on Foreign Relations to Alice Bailey's vision, the externalization of the hierarchy.

written over several decades, published in 1957, where she outlines a vision for global transformation that parallels many current UN initiatives.

And then there is Kissinger saying, a new world order will emerge. The only question is whether it will arise out of intellectual and moral insight and by design, or whether it will be forced on mankind by a series of catastrophes. And there is Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum and the Young Global Leaders. And there is Bernays and Klaus.

his techniques. So I'll read a little section here. We can see, like I said, that this writer has listened to a fair bit of Alan Watt. Edward Bernays, nephew of Sigmund Freud, developed the psychological framework

that would become modern marketing and social media manipulation. This family connection was no coincidence. Freud's psychological insights about human nature would be weaponized by his nephew into tools for mass manipulation. This pattern of family influence continues today. The co-founder of Netflix, Mark Bernays Randolph,

is Edward Bernays great-great-great-nephew, demonstrating how these bloodlines continue shaping our cultural consumption. The techniques of engineering consent and managing public opinion that Edward Bernays pioneered now operate through digital platforms at unprecedented scale, setting the stage for the phenomenon of predictive programming.

Predictive programming operates by presenting future control systems as entertainment, normalizing them before implementation. When reality mirrors fiction, the public has been preconditioned to accept it. This isn't mere coincidence. These narratives systematically prepare populations for planned transformations. As theorist Alan Watt explains,

Predictive programming works to create a psychological conditioning in our minds through a Pavlovian-like process. By repeatedly exposing people to future events or control systems through entertainment media, the responses become familiar, and those events are then accepted as natural occurrences when they manifest in reality.

Then he goes on to write that Hollywood serves as the primary vehicle for normalizing technocratic ideas. And he highlights a few movies and TV shows which consistently present future scenarios that later become reality. This article continues getting into the Fabian Society and the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations. There's a bit of Bill Gates and Jonas Salk and

Also, the Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson, I'm not sure that he ties them to the Macy Conference. I don't see that, but they were part of that Macy Group, Macy Conference that Alan Watt talked about. There's Club of Rome and Limits to Growth. This is, to me, it's like a little recap of a lot of Alan Watt. I will link that for you.

This is an abrupt and obvious edit, but I had made this video and got to thinking about it. I read you the article I shared with you, this article called the Technocratic Blueprint, which I thought had much good in it and was in many ways a great distillation of

of things that Alan Watt has told us for many, many years. The author is Joshua Stileman and I mentioned that he was a Brownstone Institute writer. And other than that, I know nothing about him. But when I read the article, I got down to his tools for resistance. Okay, so understanding their vision gives us power.

And in a way that's true. He gives us some individual actions, family and community building, and then systemic approaches. There are a lot of people that put out good information and have some systemic approaches that I disagree with, and I'm just going to point this out. He said, he writes, "Support and develop decentralized technologies."

We have a failure of imagination, but for most people this comes down to some kind of anarcho-capitalism or cryptocurrency scheme, decentralized blockchain for your neighborhood, your digital neighborhood. Build alternative economic structures is one of his prescriptions. So

That being said, the Brownstone Institute, as I mentioned, was started by Jeffrey Tucker. And again, I don't know too much about him. I hear that he is a decent human being. He's worked for Ron Paul.

Lou Rockwell, lots of people that some of you will be familiar with. It says here in Wiki that he's an American libertarian writer, publisher, entrepreneur, and advocate of anarcho-capitalism. This is a theory that says, quite rightly, that government institutions aren't necessary. He also has, in the past, promoted or been an advocate of Bitcoin. So,

I'm going to post an article that I just found from a socialist publication called Jacobin. Cryptocurrency is a giant Ponzi scheme. And I think there's a lot of truth in this. And perhaps that Ryan, who I spoke with on the latest Real History, said it most succinctly when we were discussing this. And he said, cryptocurrencies are a pyramid scheme.

So that is it. I just wanted to put this in again. I don't know this man, and there's a lot that we don't have time to pay attention to, but really having a firm grounding in the basis, in the firm grasp of the basics of this system and knowing that something so heavily promoted by the World Economic Forum is

cannot be, even if we think we're doing it in an independent community, it cannot be for our own good. We have to really think outside the box. David Hughes, David A. Hughes, has an interesting idea that he calls the camps. What camp are you in in terms of getting to the truth? And so simply he says that Camp 1 is

is most people. And camp one, they blindly believe whatever the government and the mainstream media tell them, and they are unable to think for themselves. He says, for those who make it out of camp one into camp two, then a decoy narrative awaits, and that is promoted by organized fake dissidents.

Because it is a military operation, Camp 2 is vaster than most skeptics of Camp 1 would ever expect. It has fake heroes relentlessly promoted on alternative channels. And they, as he writes here, hoover up opposition voices. And so this is where...

We get ideas that we can consider such as controlled upper opposition, controlled opposition and who is financing this controlled opposition with what we used to call Patriot Radio or the alternative media falls into camp two. This is the alternative. And David A. Hughes goes on to write, very few people make it out of camp two into camp three where the truth awaits.

And I was thinking about that, Alan and me, my desk, trying to communicate with people that I think have an ability to think outside the box. That our little Camp 3, it's so tiny and so far removed from Camp 2 that, yeah, I just hope that you can see and read smoke signals.

When I returned from Canada, there had been some family that I had not been in touch with for a long time. And early, a cousin of mine came a great distance to visit me. And we had always been close, younger. And just over the years, less and less contact. And then there you go. So she was here, and we enjoyed each other's company. I would call her a camp one friend.

And that's all there is. She's in camp one, but I love her. And she was just kind of, you know, well, what was Alan really into? And, you know, I knew that there were a lot of things that would be completely offensive and just freak her totally out. And so I thought, well, I'll play her my favorite podcast and my favorite talk of his blurb. Sorry. I will play her my favorite blurb. Sing your song and steal some time.

And she listened to a bit of it, maybe 10 minutes. I played it. We were just sitting at the kitchen table. And I could tell that she was losing interest. And I paused it. And she just said, so Alan was a philosopher. And I said, yes, I guess he was. Yes, he was a philosopher.

And she wasn't really interested in continuing, so I did not bother to play anymore. But after Alan passed away, for at least a year, in the days and the weeks and the months when I had so many big decisions and problems and things to attend to, the question that I would ask myself over and over all day long, every day, is what would Alan do?

What would Alan do? What would Alan say? What would Alan think about this? How would Alan take care of this? And I was completely dependent on that thought process for quite a while. I just didn't want to make a move or go in any direction or make any decision until I had sort of conferred with him, if you will, in that process of what would you do? What do you think? How would you handle this?

And what I realized is that over time, I didn't seem to need to ask that question so much. It just became natural to me to know, okay, yeah, that's what Alan would do. That's how he would approach this. And then it just became kind of second nature for me.

But I mentioned the other day that I'd had a bit of an epiphany about how things were. I, you know, I said in brief, it's that I can't do that. I can't be that person who says, you know, like me, subscribe to me and tries to game the system of how you build up this massive social media empire. It's just me here. And I, I, that, that, that seems to be against the grain of who I am.

But I asked the question again, what would Alan do? And the answer that I got is, well, he's not here to stop me from working myself to death. And that kind of reframed everything because as hard as we worked, as long as our days could seem, we'd watch a movie or two in the evening. We'd have a laugh or go for a walk, take the dog for a walk or whatever.

Look up at the stars. That was one of Alan's favorite things to do, was stargazing. And I've mentioned the screen tent in the summer and sometimes in the winter. It was just being outside all bundled up, looking at the sky. But he really loved that. It was a wonder-filled, contemplative, reflective kind of thing for him. And so that is my simple epiphany.

The question that I asked myself as I'm reassessing what can I do to make this support me, how can I work harder, more efficiently, etc., etc., but I kept saying, how can I work harder? And the answer that I finally arrived at is, I can't. I have to return to a place of being more receptive. And last week, someone sent me an email and said, I wanted to see if you might be interested in this book.

It's by a philosopher, German philosopher, who's deceased now. He was Catholic. His name is Joseph Piper. And the title of the book is Leisure, the Basis of Culture. And I said, oh, yes, I'd very much be interested in that. And not only will I put it at the top of my stack, I won't even put it at the top of my stack. As soon as it arrives, I will start to read it. And it arrived, and I did. The foreword is by James V. Schall.

He's a society of Jesuits. He's saying, when a culture is in the process of denying its own roots, it becomes most important to know what these roots are. We had best know what we reject before we reject it. If we are going to build a chair, the first thing we need to know above all else is what a chair is. Otherwise, we can do nothing.

We are not a culture that never understood what a human being was in his nature and in his destiny. Rather, we are a culture that having once known these things has decided against living them or understanding them. Indeed, we have decided to reject most of them, almost an act of defiance as an act of pure humanism, as if what we are is not first given to us.

We have let an empty future that we propose to make our own, that we propose to make by our own standards, become the ideal over and against a real past that revealed to us what man really was and is. Namely, a being open to wonder who did not create himself or the world in which he dwells.

And I thought that sentence, it really encapsulated Alan. Someone who was full of wonder, open to wonder, always wondering. In the foreword, Schall goes on to write, there's a little Machiavelli and a little Descartes and a little philosophizing, etc. But he said,

What is at issue in the word leisure? A famous Greek word from which we get the word school is both an inner, worldly, and a transcendent understanding of the highest things. Following Aristotle, we realize that something divine lies in our knowing of what is.

At the very beginning of this little book, and it is a short little book, Piper has two quotes. The first is from Plato. But the gods, taking pity on mankind, born to work, laid down the succession of recurring feasts to restore them from their fatigue and gave them the muses and Apollo, their leader, and Dionysus as companions in their feasts.

And in looking into Joseph Piper a little bit, this is something he wrote called In Tune with the World, a Theory, a Theory of Festivity. And I liked this little quote.

When a festival goes as it should, men receive something that is not in human power to give. In celebrating festivals festively, a man passes beyond the barriers of this present life on earth. The second little quote in the introduction to this little book is, Be still and know that I am God. Psalm 4610. And Alan liked that one, and in fact...

He wrote a Christmas composition for us entitled Be Still and Know. This gets right back to Ramaswami and Musk. They would work us to death. These who mock us by pretending to be superheroes, they would work us to death because we are their slaves. This is how they see us.

Joseph Piper writes, "The concept of 'intellectual work' may be traced back and explored in terms of various historical sources. It implies in the first place a very definite view of the mode and manner of man's intellectual knowledge. What happens when we look at a rose? What do we do as we become aware of color and form?"

Our soul is passive and receptive. We are, to be sure, awake and active, but our attention is not strained. We simply look insofar that is as we contemplate it and are not already observing it. For observing implies that we are beginning to count, to measure, to weigh up.

Observation is a tense activity, which is what Ernst Junger meant when he called seeing an act of aggression. To contemplate, on the other hand, to look in this sense means to open one's eyes receptively to whatever offers itself to one's vision. And the things seen enter into us, so to speak, without calling for any effort or strain on our part to possess them.

There can hardly be any doubt that that or something like it is the way we become sensorially aware of things.

But what of knowledge, the mind's spiritual knowledge? Is there such a thing as a purely receptive attitude of mind in which we become aware of immaterial reality and invisible relationships? Is there such a thing as pure intellectual contemplation to adopt the terminology of the schools? In antiquity, the answer given was always yes. In modern philosophy, for the most part, the answer given is no.

Then he goes on to write about intellectus, ratio and intellectus. And by intellectus, he is talking about something, the capacity of simplex intuitus, that simple vision to which truth offers itself like a landscape to the eye. I thought that was beautiful. He writes...

Philosophers of antiquity looked upon the active effort of discursive thought as the properly human element in our knowledge. It is the ratio they held which is distinctively human. The intellectus they regarded as being already beyond the sphere allotted to man, and yet it belonged to man, though in one sense superhuman.

the purely human by itself could not satiate man's powers of comprehension for man of his very nature reaches out beyond the sphere of the human touching on the order of pure spirits. So I've talked way too long. I had a lot on my mind today. I thank you for listening and I encourage me to do what Alan would do. And that is make some time and every day to wonder,

I was also sent another lovely little book this week, and I thank you all for sending me little things that brighten my day. And this was called The Jade Flute, Chinese Poems in Prose. And I opened it up to the very first page. There's a lovely illustration, and the first poem is contentment. And the second is, I have seen a road.

I have seen a road that wanders in green shade that runs through sweet fields of flowers. My eyes have traveled there and journeyed far along that cool, fine road. But I will never really walk that road. It does not really lead to where she lives. When she was born, they bound her little feet with leather bands. My beloved never walks the road of shade and flowers.

When she was born, they bound her little heart with leather bands. My beloved never listens to my song. And I think that that is a good entrance into this blurb that I am playing for you today from Alan Watt. Tunnel vision brought to you by those with vision. And he said...

I always think of the world of the individual as a set of tunnels parallel to each other. The individual, depending on where he is born, education, career, and lifestyle, will fit into one of the tunnels, pre-made tunnels.

then they will go through their lives never realizing there are parallel tunnels. That's tunnel vision. It's also tunnel thinking. People, once they're in the tunnel and they've accepted it, when the curiosity of childhood ceases and the media and daily routine takes over, they stop questioning for themselves. They've been trained that everything they need to know will be told to them by the authorized media. So I think that the...

The little Chinese girl with her feet bound that this anonymous poet has written about is us when we're born into this tunnel and we cannot escape. We are bound there. And it is sad. It is a tragedy. But in my kind of new, my new year, new found commitment to not work myself to death, I was, I just caught a glimpse at the top of the stairs of

at my cats by the front door. And there's a doormat on the inside of the door. And a little crack of sunlight was coming through the bottom of the door. And I saw that one cat was playing with the mat and playing with the little sliver of sunlight. It was about an inch long and about a quarter inch wide. And it looked like a little worm of sunlight. And the other two cats were looking on

As the first cat, she lifted up the mat and she kind of attacked it and she swiped at the little light sliver. And that lasted about 30 seconds and then it was gone. And I thought, if I was in my constant work mode, I would have missed that. And it was a lovely little scene. And I'm glad that I didn't. And I hope that you have a good week, that you forgive me for speaking so long today.

that you visit the website and see some of the changes that are there that hopefully makes it a little bit easier for you to see what's going on. And I wish you a week with a bit of wonder. Take care. Hi, folks. I'm Alan Watt. This is Wednesday, the 6th of June, 2007. And this is CuttingThroughTheMatrix.com. I always think of the world...

of the individual is a set of tunnels parallel to each other. The individual, depending on where he's born, education, career and lifestyle, will fit into one of the tunnels, pre-made tunnels. Then they will go through their lives never realizing there are parallel tunnels. That's tunnel vision, but it's also tunnel thinking. People, once they're in the tunnel and they've accepted it,

When the curiosity of childhood ceases and the media and daily routine takes over, they stop questioning for themselves and are then trained that everything they need to know will be told to them by the authorized media. This didn't happen by chance. The understanding of the psychological tunnel syndrome was known in ancient times too.

by philosophers that led your class that had time to think after they'd been educated in the old ancient mysteries which to a great extent were devoted to how people and peoples can be controlled. They are sciences in other words. Sciences accumulated over millennia of observation on humanity.

Sciences which were never forgotten or lost. But sciences, because they depend on using these techniques of tunnel creation for the general people, were never shared with the general people. We find today, for instance, that after the events, long after events, a new, different and often truer version of reality or a past event is given to us by the government of the day.

with no explanation, it's just that a generation or more has passed. Those who are growing up in the present don't care about the big tricks, the big cons that were pulled in the past over the people. It's also the revelation of the method, a form of legality of the rules by which an elite go by. Very few people have the ability to think outside of their tunnel once they

They have passed a certain stage in growing up. Growing up is a difficult time for most people, especially today with the dysfunctional families, the new definitions of families, or no family at all, where the state brings you up in foster care. A very old idea which was promoted for a long time, even from Plato's day, in the secret societies of his day, which were aristocratic societies. They were not for the commoner.

The commoner didn't get into the societies until the 1700s when the low-level masonry was created because a middle class would be necessary to manage an industrial age. It also became a sifting ground to find out who could truly keep secrets, who didn't mind that the public were being fooled and conned at every turn, those who would take the rewards and keep their mouths shut.

and turn a blind eye. Lower forms of the secret societies had been given in ancient times. We can go into Mithraism, which paralleled Christianity. Mithraism really initially came from India, as much of religion has. In fact, many people thought that Mithraism was just another version of Christianity, with similar stories where the virtues of an individual human could be groomed and heightened.

Mithraism was given first to a military and slave population. The slaves often became members of the military. The military has always been very important for creating an ongoing world order and fraternities most certainly will stick together. Once in a while we'll have an expose of military massacres where the higher ones get together, write the same reports to justify each other and cover each other

We find the same thing with police, who are all encouraged to join Freemasonry, and often you'll find pictures in people's homes of their sons or daughters, mainly sons, and the sons have their cadet uniform on or the graduation uniform on, and next to that is a photograph of the same person in their Masonic regalia. They cover each other. It's a form of insurance policy belonging to Freemasonry. Part of the appeal to a world order policy

two Freemasons and those who control Freemasons because it's really an arm of those who push towards world order. The Brotherhood of Man is a fantastic idea, yet to get to a Brotherhood of Man you need revolutions ongoing and a standardization system because it's primarily the differences in cultures which lead to conflict. Always understood. Pythagoras, after being taught

by the Egyptian priesthood went to Crotona in Italy which at that time was a Greek colony where he started up his mystery school he recruited the young middle class and elite children, youngsters brought in a vow of silence long long before the Essenes and the later Catholic monks and so on because it's all the same format you see Pythagoras also brought in women young girls

gave them a good education and sent them out almost like spies to marry the upper nobility, to become perfect marriage partners. Then they would start to subvert the minds of the rulers and the younger ones below would foment revolution within the military and overthrow the system. Once it was overthrown, the idea was to bring in a new order, a new order which would amalgamate military armies

and go off and conquer other nations, bringing in the same system, and always seeking out an intelligentsia, an expert class to train the brighter ones to rule in a common system. Revolution has been going on for a long time. Sometimes it takes a hundred or hundreds or thousands of years to complete the great work. The idea of democracy would always be given to people's

in times of transitional change to the new system where they would accept the new system. Democracy gives you an idea or a feeling that you have an input to those who make the decisions at the top. That was to be the cover. In reality, a secret government would always be parallel running the show because human nature, base nature at the bottom with petty jealousies, differences,

took time, they were too time consuming, they caused too much conflict within any society and therefore there would always be a parallel government to deal with all of this, to bypass it, to get things done. Some people are born into this world with the idea that things are simply wrong, which is shocking to those who are born into the world thinking so much is wrong. Most people don't know this.

Those who do know it are shocked to find out that others don't know it. Those who don't know what the problem is, they simply know it's wrong, often have very active minds because they're not brought into the... Those who know the ruling elite, they don't know the answers, they just know everything's wrong. They tend to rebel in small, ineffective ways or become, which is more the rule, self-destructive.

they turn to drugs or alcohol to quieten their minds and to try and fit in with a peer group which doesn't work for them if they're truly capable of understanding the big picture which fewer actually have. It's always a shock to find out how conditioned people really are and yet every day everybody makes decisions in their own personal lives that sets their character that sets their character

concretizes it often until they never change, really, from the age of 20 or 21 right to the day they die. It's fixed, and yet life is supposed to be an ongoing process of maturity and wisdom. It doesn't work that way with most people, especially today in an age where we are under a scientific indoctrination from birth to death. I always remember

Little quotes that I read as I go through libraries when I was very young, trying to find out what was behind the unease I sensed all around me. The Marquis of Halifax, in a book, I think it was, The Moral Thoughts and Reflections, said,

as they think him for not agreeing with them in their mistakes. In other words, you have to step outside of all conditioning, all sticky thinking, because conditioning creates sticky thinking. It creates formats of thought that you're supposed to fall into when you ask certain questions, since they've already given you the pat answers in the past. You have to step out of the world to see it as it really is,

And that is not an easy task for most people. Most cannot do it. The conditioning is too great. They'd rather believe that six o'clock news is true. They've been trained to believe. They're being told all there is to know. But their betters have decided for them what they're being told is all they need to know for the present. Pythagoras, who was only one of various revolutionaries trained...

because Egypt exported adepts who went out to foment revolutions, always with the same technique of recruiting the younger, brighter ones, sifting them out through processes of questions, answers and long periods of silence, because those who cannot listen are of no use. Someone who constantly jumps in with questions

as higher truths are being explained to them, is not listening to the answers. You watch first, you look, you listen, as they say in higher masonry. It also shows you that a person who constantly asks the questions before the previous answers have been finished, are really wanting justification of the answers they already believe in. It's like those who say they're seeking truth, but are in reality shopping for a religion or a belief

in which they already have chosen. That is not someone who's looking for truth. There has always been a parallel government down through history, sometimes showing itself in a more overt fashion and at other times hiding behind democracy but never losing control, always shaping the next step and the next step to the future. Those who doubt this should study history. Those who are impatient can find the more recent examples

You should read the report from Norman Dodd. He was the staff director of the Congressional Committee to Investigate the Tax-Exempt Foundations in 1954 for the Rees Commission, the R-E-E-C-E Commission or Committee. Rees was the Congressional Chairman who set up this committee to see why the big foundations, the philanthropists,

the ones with tax-exempt status and incredible amounts of money, why they were funding what seemed to be the communist groups within the United States and abroad. Coming from his perspective, Norman Dodd, D-O-D-D, which was a tunnel where he had swallowed his version of history, went to some of the better schools, as they say, started off in the banking system,

went through the collapse of the great banks and then later was asked to do the Rees Commission or committee investigation on behalf of the Speaker of the House of Congress. He went round the Ford, Carnegie, Guggenheim, Rockefeller foundations and they told him quite bluntly at the top that they took their orders directly from the White House, not from the Congress but from the White House.

Tie that in with Professor Carol Quigley's statement in Tragedy and Hope and in the Anglo-American Establishment that for some time, up to 50 years prior to the writing of their books in the 60s, Quigley states, as a historian of the Council on Foreign Relations, he said there was always a certain amount of competition allowed with the lower congressional parties and individuals involved.

But the ones at the top, the ones in other words that would get to the White House is what he referred to, and the coterie around them had been vetted by a much higher organisation outside of the democratic or republican rule. The idea that was brought in a long time ago into the system was that the democratic appeal was to the common people, the masses of people, to give them an impression of

that they had a say in the direction of their lives and their offspring for times to come. However, it had always been known, including in ancient Greece, that democracy was slow, cumbersome, and when you have party bickering and personal bickering for power, it took forever to get even necessary agendas through. It also meant you had a lot of unnecessary, time-consuming, labour-consuming and money-consuming activities

that were the result of conflicts of parties. It was therefore decided that to keep the people happy, they would promote the idea of democracy, with always the understanding that most people to the elite are classed as base people, creatures of instinct. The profane is what they call them, the masses, etc., the unwashed. Therefore they would be guided, like children are guided. That's why you have good shepherds in every religion.

which means the people are the sheep. Sheep are very dumb animals. Deception is the rule in all of this. And Norman Dodd found out from the Ford Foundation, by the guy at the top, who told him that apart from accepting orders from the White House, and always had been, not the Congress, that the idea was to change society so vastly and greatly in America, but also for the West, though. This is comfortably merged

the Soviet system with that of the Western system. Therefore they were funding all groups, all conflicting groups because through conflict you have compromise down the road. Compromise is a stepping stone towards the next part. Then more conflict, then more compromise the next part. That's how society is guided. The ancients used to say that if you could understand nature

with its opposites, the dialectic, and the opposite of summer is winter, the opposite of spring is autumn, then you could predict the next stage that the public would go through. In other words, you bring them from a spring, you bring them to the summer, you guide them to the fall, you guide them to the winter. Conflict is necessary when you have an agenda, a planned agenda,

And you're dealing with such a variety of mentalities in society, a variety of interests, conflicting interests. And that was the reason given to Dodd that those much higher than the runners of the foundation, the directors of them, and all the other foundations, said there were too many conflicting interests. They could not be reconciled. Therefore, a supra-conflict.

government, you might say, was really in charge. What they didn't tell him is that he'd been in charge for an awful long time because in the 1700s, in the higher Masonic books, they wrote about this. They wrote a lot about it in the French books of the 1700s, of how to guide the world into this new efficient society that would come to be.

They knew that personal interests, group interests, and even business interests would conflict. Therefore, there could only be one dominant minority, as there already was, even in the 1700s. It's now come to pass, as always, 50 years or more after the events, or at least when it started, one part of it has been admitted to, and that is that the CIA had a branch which promoted all of the American culture,

was in charge of everything, fashion, you name it, from the top, including the nihilistic art for artists. All those things which right-wing people would think were communist, radical, nihilistic, were promoted by, not the Soviet Union, but by those within the CIA, and those who worked for the great foundations, as Dodd was told, were primarily ex-OSS people.

precursor of the CIA and CIA members. That's why they got off with what they're doing right up to the present day. That's why you have a Rockefeller who set up the World Council of Churches, Wicca. He loved Wicca. The Y is, you know, Wiccanism. He also loved NSA, NISA, NASA, the head of the Sanhedrin. All these occultic terms they love to use. And it is no different in any other Western country. It's the same system.

The intelligence agencies have compartments, and often one part at the bottom doesn't know what the higher parts are doing. They know not to ask. It's a need-to-know basis. But they all have a top department which not only works with all other intelligence agencies, they are part of the one intelligence agency. Mr. Rockefeller gives out awards, or world citizenship awards, and has for many years to...

Many of the names you're familiar with from newscasts over the years. The world's citizenship idea is very old. Sounds appealing to many people who in lower orders work towards it to think it's a good idea. And it certainly would be if it was leading to a fair and just system. Fair from everybody's point of view. Because legalistically, remember, everything can be interpreted wrongly.

in doublespeak two ways depending on how you view it and we are dealing with deception which specializes in legalistic words which do often have double meanings. We find for instance that every major author and artist from classical to rock music, the ones who guided that, but definitely the big authors especially historians who wrote and rewrote history

with slants to guide your thoughts to conclusions which you would then agree with because you thought you'd been informed were employed by the big foundations they were given scholarships picked at school for their abilities then often put through by the guggenheim foundation in the u.s and others sent off to london for their education their final education

as to their role and what kinds of histories they would write, what slants they would put upon it, what facts they would omit and what alterations they would insert. This is then taught in major schools and generations grow up thinking that what they're being told is true. It's difficult for the average person to get past the shock or even if they can get to the stage of shock. Most can't even do that. They can't believe they've been so carefully groomed and lied to.

and if it occurs to you why would you be lied to in a school isn't a school a good thing to teach you truth but school is really a scientific format of putting you in a tunnel at the top of the greatest foundations and societies the ones who speak equality fairness justice are the biggest liars of all like the politician they tell the people what they want to hear

but always for a different ending, and it will be a different ending always. They believe they must always deceive the great unwashed masses who cannot comprehend the greater things as they rush about their lives and pay off their credit cards and try to pay their rent and buy all the goodies that flood in and are temporarily being made available as we go through this consuming frenzy as though there's no tomorrow.

The world that was envisaged a long time ago was a world of peace for an elite, for the intelligentsia, where they will no longer need to fool the people because through science they would perfect the great masses and to be being better servants. The faith was all to be put in the sciences of psychology, mass psychology, educational psychology,

The psychology of media indoctrination, entertainment indoctrination, where there's always messages, so that we would come to a stage where science would be God. We wouldn't question what are given as facts, because the scientists are only the white-coated priesthoods of today. And in olden times, not so long ago, in fact, people believed everything the priests of any nation, any creed, told them. Now it's just the white-coated scientists.

and rather than talk in Latin, saying things which sound impressive and magical but which you don't understand, you talk in scientific jargon where compiling words and adding them together can make you believe pretty well anything. Eventually this parallel government, this quiet behind-the-scenes government that hid behind charity primarily, philanthropy, would come more and more to the fore

The time limits for this happening were discussed at the setting up of the League of Nations and then further discussed with timetables when they set up the United Nations. Today they're also calling a lot of it public-private partnerships. The idea being that the big international corporations which are part of the foundation system, because they all work together and often money is funneled from one to the other

to the big foundations and back again. They can get the jobs done quicker for the dominant minority rather than having to go through the lower houses of government where they squabble and bicker over egos as the little ones want more and more fame for themselves. But as long as those at the top of all parties are vetted by the same dominant minority, they keep the agendas on track. The conflicts that are caused

as they bring about this world system are many. The most obvious one was understood a long time ago. This isn't the first time in the world where peoples have been moved en masse into another territory and become the victims of squabbles and fights and cultural clashes. Look at the ancient tyrants of the Middle East when they moved whole peoples off their land into other lands. Look at the histories of London today

when the mandated populations within Britain would be moved en masse to the Dominions, as they call them, the Commonwealth. Read the history of the European Union. At least that's what's been made available to us so far. There's other books which are less well-known about it. Where they said a long time ago that the creme de la creme from the schooling systems in all countries would form a new travelling bureaucracy, a nomadic group.

where they travel from city to city across the world with temporary homes serving the dominant minority, the winners and losers in the coming New World Order of Jack Satali. This is already happening. They have European newspapers now. You can look into the jobs section. You'll find that they already have the best in certain professions and jobs moving from their own homelands

to wherever the work is. Well, for every winner, how many losers are there? What happens to them? Well, tough luck. That's what happens to them. In the United States, you're seeing a steady drumbeat to drum up hatred against the incoming Mexicans and others. It's not just Mexicans from Latin America. So that the people will fight the effect of a policy by fighting the people at the bottom rather than going for the cause.

Because the cause sit in lofty towers, in big foundations, and they fund all the movements and associations that bring in and promote integration. They're unscathed, and it's a sad thing when people turn, when ordinary people turn on ordinary people from another country because their policies are pushing them in to yours. Rockefeller said in one of his speeches that

that the current generation is the cannon fodder for this part of their agenda. Cannon fodder, those are his words, as the changes are to occur. I have it on tape. That's what it is. That's what we are to these people, the elitists that can give us great sounding words of integration and peace and prosperity, etc. While to their own, they talk about the populations being cannon fodder

for the particular change and then he said you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs so the shattered lives the mayhem that ensues as cultures come together into conflict through mass migrations is just unfortunate cracking of eggs to make the omelette the agenda must come to pass and through the conflict you'll find that the totalitarian system that already has everything it needs written into laws

under emergency laws will then be enforced affecting everybody and they will use the conflict to justify it you're on a chessboard and you don't even know you're a pawn norman dodd also found out by going through the records of some of these foundations that they'd all come to the conclusion a long time ago that to unite a world and bring in a new system of living a new way of living new values

which obviously could not simply evolve. They'd have to be taught and doctrinated. That's why they hired all the best authors. They trained them, in fact. They picked them as scholars and gave them scholarships. They knew that war, they could think of nothing more than war. War was the main motivating force for pulling people together into a common cause and to create changes, great change.

That's why it's been used down through the eons. People always think they're fighting for freedom, and often, down the road, it might take some time, you find you've all been had, and that those things that you fought for were all illusions. When you compare it to what you end up with, you can often end up with a worse tyranny than you'd ever imagined. Carl Quigley also said that, and he was a member of the Intelligensic Elite Group,

who chose people to be Rhodes Scholars, who chose them for other scholarships too, and who believed firmly in the agenda. He said that in war, you can get more done in five years of war with bureaucracy springing up, etc. That's what he meant, and laws just ran through on a social level. He says that's how you can do it. For a social change, you get more done in five years of war than 50 years of peace.

That's why you've had wars against drugs, wars against pretty well everything now. Poverty. Nothing ends up the way you thought it would end up because it didn't have the initial intent that you thought it did. It created massive bureaucracies and more and more police powers. More intrusive as you've been trained and have been for the last 40, 50 years to obey and those who were there to serve you

I've been taught gradually to dominate you and train you. Not too long ago I did a talk and I read off on a scientific magazine's site. I demolished their childlike indoctrination of the global warming theory. The next day they pulled it off their site. Last week I talked about this possible station, television station in Holland that was going to

you might say, raffle, a game show type thing, a dying woman's kidneys off to people who needed them. The next day after I talked about it, they came out and said it was a hoax, which I doubt. It was testing the water as a trial balloon, which they do all the time. And the content was true enough because we have been so debased. We're ready now for this kind of thing to be shown as misery, as flaunted in a game show.

as the circuses of ancient Rome are revived, the people are ready because you can overstimulate all faculties until you go into deviancy. And you can have deviant societies and whole populations. When we think about prior to the 50s, the old idea of a mafia, which was started up as a branch, by the way, of Freemasonry, Giuseppe Massini, the revolutionary,

who was trained by Albert Pike, set up the Mafia. He authorised it to come in and gave it its manifesto and its charters. The Mafia were the guys who dealt with all the underworld. They dealt with the baser things in life that people are prone to. Yet we've transformed and transitioned into a society where worldwide, especially across Europe and America, is the same format because all one were already one and have been for your whole life, in fact.

You have to be trained slowly to accept it, that's all. That's the only difference. The governments authorised the starting up of casinos, which at one time was the realm of mafia. Your governments authorised casinos, which had the old boots and glamour and the girls with scanty clothing and all the best attributes that attract people, bright lights, and you lose your money. In the earlier days, when they brought in these casinos...

I think they came into Britain around the 70s in selected areas. Supposedly, we were told to lay our fears and to camouflage the fact that your government was now, and always was, the mafia. The money collected would go to charity, of course. They always hide behind charity and good works. And, the big kicker, your national debt will get paid off. And everyone says that's wonderful because we've got such massive national debts to international bankers.

Yet years later you find, well, everything still goes up, taxes still go up, the debt gets bigger. We're never told how much of the debt is paid off by the big casinos. And when you have money going towards hospitals which are run by our tax money in the first place and who gets fixed sums every year, not so much fixed, they always spend every penny they have, big rush at the end of the year, the financial year, to spend all they have or they won't get the same next year.

How could they possibly accept donations which would then deduct from the money that are allocated by the government? Where does this money go that they're given? Think about it. The corruption at the top is and always has been astronomical because the world of the profane, the unwashed masses, as they say, is there to serve them.

Low Freemasons really think the profane are just the ignorant, the baser people, the pool, the same pool that they came from themselves, and that by self-improvement, as if by rote and wearing silly little outfits with aprons that squares their offspring that comes from the genitals, that's why it covers the penis, they will make a better world, whereas the brighter ones who get up way past the usual degrees...

clue in as to its true intent but it's hard to attack charitable foundations. The word charity itself is so nice as they pretend to help the widow and orphans. An allegory for something much deeper and not what you think. Three years ago the United Nations had a special documentary out on its future world state. China was picked as the model for the world state and

And they showed you how the Chinese big festivals put on by the government, with all the acrobats and so on, making big, almost like cake-like structures, the gato of human beings all working in unison. This was a symbol of everything and everybody working together. They're applauded for their one child per family policy. We've all to copy this tradition.

for only one part of the whole agenda. The agenda is the never-ending story because humankind is the building material and it's up to those at the top, not the creators but the architects. Architects can only take material that's already in existence and through science understand how to use it or perfect it, as they say. Just like in Egypt, Osiris was the allegory

for the church of those in the higher mysteries and Osiris was the body. Same story in countless religions because they're all given from the same source. Different names. To finish off I'd like to just mention that since the 50s at least the same CIA which ran the culture, industry and left-wing and right-wing groups and funded them and had them in conflict at least openly in the papers on the surface

Neither side, neither followers knowing they're being guided, also ran what's called the Patriot business. And it truly is a business which has been going on for a long time. I remember an elderly woman in her 80s calling up a talk show when the Patriot business was primarily on the AM and shortwave radio worldwide. Hearing the usual stuff about terror, terror, terror, here's the antidote by this.

And she said, I've watched this for years, my whole life, she said, and nothing changes except the agenda goes on. And it's true. We are the best informed slaves in existence that ever were in existence. And the Patriot business takes two formats. One is to sell you all the gold and the silver, even though it will be useless to you at the end, because in their own business plan, you'll be throwing it in the streets. It's very heavy stuff to carry, if you've got beans as well to carry, perhaps, or water.

And it's only worth what the person who's going to barter the goods that you want decides on, ultimately, in a crisis situation. The other part is the whole alternate health industry, which is also run by the same groups, who are under the guise of discussing illnesses, being programmed to be terrified and hypochondriacal. And at the end, they always give you the solutions and the antidotes, which are terribly expensive.

That is the only type of outlet that a person like myself can even be heard upon or these shows. That's the format because there are no free independent outlets out there. There's some, yeah, there's blog spots and so on, but that's temporary too. They said before they gave us the internet access.

They coined the term the information wars. These people are ready for wars. They don't wait for them starting and say, what shall we do about it? Let's counter it. They set it up in advance. So they expect everything like this to happen. The other shows I get on are primarily the New Age type shows, the Art Bell clones, which are meant to fascinate people. They cater primarily to the New Age, the New Age set up again by the same people at the top.

to bring in a new way to also disable the minds of people to lessen cohesion with people because new agers are taught really that the me syndrome is all important it's my journey it's my me me me I and when that happens you've just given away your ability to survive because people get through great crisis in history by helping each other and you can meditate all you want you can also

learn all your breathing rhythms, etc., or hyperventilate and see spots before your eyes for altered states. But if an experience doesn't have purpose to it, it's just a dream. True experiences are rare. Very few have the ability to have them, because all work, ultimately, is not done by repetition of formula. The work is done by the mind working upon yourself and analyzing you.

the good and the bad and the ugly. The New Agers are taught to look upon the positive, so they don't want to know what's happening in the world, so they've been deactivated from participating and being indignant about the horrors that are happening and will happen. Then after I'm on some of these New Ager shows, they'll have some guy on about having sex with a space alien, so to the listener who doesn't know too much,

When he thinks of me, when I'm spouting out facts, he'll wrap it up with all of the other stuff, the dreaming, until it's all meaningless. What I've said becomes fantasy to them. It's wrapped up with the fantasy. That's the sad state of the world. It's the true state of the world. And nothing grabs people's attentions more than escapism into the supernatural. People who crave the supernatural won't achieve it.

people who want power and that's mainly why individuals go into it is to find power would abuse it there are other people who truly believe they can mix science with religion or those things that religion talks about or promotes yet science itself has been directed for hundreds if not thousands of years to a specific ending you can't use something which is intended

to dominate you. It didn't come with two handles, it came with one handle and those who design these sciences hold the handle. You can't have a bit of one and the other. You can't have your cake and eat it too, as they say. Science will not help. Science is designed to alter humanity into better servants. Science is designed to give massive life extension

to a small dominant minority. They will not extend it to others because they have a population depopulation agenda on the go at the same time. Why would they give you life extension? Think about it. They don't think you're so special. Part of the whole Darwinian concept was to indoctrinate people into a belief in evolution. Then around the 1800s, 1900s, they talked about how evolution jumps, just jumps a whole range

of improvement into another type of evolution. The great leap forward, they call it. And that's what's been drummed into people who've been brought up by comic books with the superstars with superpowers through science. You must want your chains. It makes it so much easier when you put your hands out to be cuffed voluntarily. Never ends up with a good ending, though. Yet people are expecting the great leap forward and everyone thinks they're special.

And I'll be one of the chosen to get all the great benefits that science is going to confer upon the privileged few. The only hope the good people left in this world have is to help each other, to promote humane values, to point out the injustices and the horror that's been done in the name of progress and science. When we devalue human life, and we have drastically devalued

Right in the 20th century to the present, we are devaluing ourselves. When we casually take euthanasia, which again is legal in Holland, it's state-authorized. When we take these things as normal, because the eugenics program always was run by the elite, and the agenda for eugenics is run by an elite. They've never stopped, never will stop, because they've never faltered or altered their course.

They set their plans and they work towards them. And if they seem to back off for a little while, they come back again, often under many guises, but they eventually get what they want because the people are diverted off into other areas of crisis or economic depression or personal mishaps in a dysfunctional society as their relationships fall apart, intentionally so. Only by helping each other

Not by being stupid and turning the other cheek to the psychopaths. There's plenty of them in today's world. And all strata of society. Will this alter, this course alter? And it won't alter for everyone. People are deciding their futures. Even the ignorant are deciding their future. Because we all have personal choices daily. And the beginning of all understanding comes with reflection upon oneself. And when you ask, who am I? What am I?

That's the path that leads you to questioning everything. Because you make decisions all along in your search for yourself. And your decisions do affect others, even in your personal life, all the time. Ultimately, you don't need a God to forgive you. The hardest thing that people have in life, if they still have some morality, natural morality or conscience in them, the hardest thing is being able to forgive yourself. Gods can always forgive.

So don't fight with each other. Conflict is managed by intelligent people who understand the sciences. Those who follow the leaders in ethnic groups, racial groups, creeds, be very careful because the survival of those people over there also defines your own survival. When we don't care or have empathy for people who are being blown up or bombed elsewhere in the world or starved to death,

We're condemning ourselves because one day it will come round to you and who will be there to weep for you or help. That is part of the survival instinct to help others in distress. It truly is because as you help others, you help yourself. Maybe not immediately in the same way, but it's the best insurance policy for survival there is. I speak to those who are looking and searching

I hope to fill in the gaps that have led you to where you are, give you the information. And it's uplifting to see young people here and there across the world who are catching on and maybe diverted from going into the circle, the round and round circle of trying to quieten their minds by drugs or alcohol or destructive means. For myself and Hamish, it's good night and may your God or your gods

Show me prison. Show me jail.

Show me a prison man whose face is run and panned And I'll show you young men with many reasons why And there about for a fortune may go you or I Show me and I'll leave

Show me a train, show me a hobo who sleeps out in the rain. And I'll show you a man with many reasons why. And there but for fortune may go you.

Thank you.

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

Thank you.