Hi people, this is Melissa and today is January 26, 2025. I thought I would just try that out because I was listening to different talks from Alan today and he started out March 14, 2007 saying, Hi people, this is Alan Watt.
And he never said that. He'd always say, hi, folks. So there you go. Hi, people. I hope you're all doing well. And I wanted to thank you all for the tremendous support that you have been to me, especially over the last couple of months, and that I am...
just squeezing by and able to pay that huge property tax bill and this is tremendous and I have also kind of started something new with my family where we meet and talk and it's more of a like family support group where we just say what the problems are and we kind of bounce around some ideas and it's been helpful too.
But I simply would not have been able to meet this obligation without your help, and I thank you. I haven't been able to make any other changes that I wanted to on the website, but over time, I will. And hopefully, it's a little bit easier for you to see me
the two big things that I'm hoping that you'll be interested in right now. And the first is Waiting for the Miracle Book because in Book Club we will launch into talking about that in March. And then there is the new Flash Drive project. So again, thank you so much. I also wanted to say for those of you who are reading We, the sci-fi fiction novel,
reading along with myself and Nick Hayes from Hayes Reviews, he said last week, I believe I said that we were going to be talking on January 30. And that gave Nick a bit of a start. So it is not January 30. But in late February, we will be having a recording on that.
And then Saturday, this upcoming Saturday, the 1st of February, in the Telegram channel, we are going to be talking live about Chapter 19, The New Era.
And that will be Graham in Germany, who is covering a couple of sections, and Dan in Canada is covering a section, and I am also covering a section. So I hope that you can join us, and I'm hoping that I'll get that video done not too long after the recording. But February is going to be...
an interesting month because I have some personal things that will take me away from my desk a bit and I'll do the best that I can keeping up but you'll notice that some things will be different and I think that that might be the
the overall of the introductory things that I wanted to remind you of or tell you about, but mostly I want to thank you for ordering, for having subscription donations, for just sending me encouraging emails, and I am, that's just great, you know. I got a card from someone last week who told me to keep going and then keep swimming.
I think that might be, forgive me because I haven't seen the Disney movie, but I think it might be from a movie called Finding Nemo. Just keep swimming. So I am going to keep swimming. There were a couple of things that I wanted to mention, little things that crossed my mind because of other projects that I was working on this week.
I did a recording for Real History, and I spoke with Allison from Virginia. And part of Allison's story was going to art school and creating a piece that had a bit to do, it was a bit of a commentary on art.
America and what may not be good about America you know this idea of American exceptionalism and the the bigness the overdone nests of everything and so you can check that talk out but one of the things that she used for the art piece was a friend of hers was singing
in the style of Marilyn Monroe, rather breathlessly, "Happy Birthday Mr. President." And this was based on the real event where Marilyn Monroe sang "Happy Birthday" to John F. Kennedy. And so when I was illustrating that talk, I actually went and found footage of Marilyn Monroe singing that, coming out on stage and singing at the whole presentation.
It was interesting. The second little visual that I discovered was when I was illustrating the book club video for the last chapter that we covered a couple of weeks ago and I'm just a bit behind on things and so it took me two whole weeks to get to illustrate that video for chapter 18.
And I found footage of when Nikita Khrushchev came to America on a tour and he was shown the sights, so to speak. And one of the sights that he was presented with was a performance and the performance included a vigorous can-can presentation. And can-can is a music called dance music.
from the 1840s. And there is no way to see this, even if you're completely jaded or corrupted, as other than sexually provocative. And if you can imagine what it might be like to be in a musical in France in 1840 and see women flipping their skirts over their heads so that you just see their
pantaloons or pantalettes or whatever they called their underwear, this would have been a shocking sight. So here is Nikita Khrushchev up in the balcony watching this presentation and the vigorous dancers rather athletically exposing their backside. It reminded me of the book, I never can remember the name of it, but Francis Stoner Saunders'
CIA and the Cultural Cold War, something like that. Sorry, I should just keep the book right in front of me so I have it. But one of the ideas of the CIA's involvement with the arts in the Cold War period was to give a demonstration to the Soviet bloc countries
of the freedom that the West and the Western artists had. And so it's now been declassified. It's interesting. This is just one of the more comprehensive books that shows the CIA's involvement in the arts. So I thought of that, and I noticed that Marilyn Monroe was also at one of the events welcoming Khrushchev.
And I think I spotted Liz Taylor in the audience. They didn't make a big deal, but they panned over, and I think that was her. And when the can-can dancers, and for, you know, just look up can-can. And for you people who are old enough, Hollywood made a movie called Moulin Rouge in 2001, and you get a bit of can-can in that.
But I think that one of the Can-Can dancers turned out to be Shirley MacLaine. So this was a big event for Khrushchev. And I just wonder what he was thinking. Because what I was thinking about both Marilyn Monroe's singing to President Kennedy and the Can-Can for Khrushchev was vulgar. This is vulgar.
It's coarse and it's common and it's offensive to good taste. That's what I thought. So at the presidential inauguration that we had about a week ago, Jeff Bezos was there with his fiance. And Jeff Bezos owns Amazon Inc.
and the Washington Post newspaper and Blue Origin. I think he just successfully launched a rocket or some such stunt like that about a week ago. And he's very, very rich. And his fiance was there in her underwear. I think that her underwear was the entire point of the outfit.
And there was a lot of commentary on it. Megyn Kelly, the newscaster, just went off on how she didn't want her daughters to see that or emulate it or her sons to see it. And so that was controversy and soap opera for we little people. We can be upset because she had the audacity, the vulgarity to show up at the inauguration in her brassiere.
So this is the world that we live in, the world that is presented to us. It is vulgar. It's run by billionaires. This is what they are showing us now. This is who is in charge. First, you see, eight years ago, we had President Trump, someone that we were told he's got the money so he doesn't need anything except to go drain the swamp.
And we're given a lot of PR guff like that. But now I think it's all very clearly out in the open. Some time ago, maybe about a year or so ago, I saw a book and the title captured my attention. And it was on sale. I found a cheap copy. And so I purchased it. And it is entitled Controligarchs. And that's a catchy title, isn't it?
And starting left to right, you have Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum. And beside him is Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook. And at the top of the page, top of the book cover, is Bill Gates. And to the other side of Bill Gates is Jeff Bezos. And below Jeff Bezos is George Soros.
So the title is Controligargs, and then it says, Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life. And so it has sat on my table for at least nine months now, and it's
I kind of knew even when I bought it that this would be territory that that I'm already familiar with but like I said it was it was a good title. I did not know the author of the book his name is Seamus Bruner and so today I looked up to see who Seamus Bruner is and the foreword was written by Peter Schweitzer. So
Now I know for sure that I won't be breaking this book in any significant way, but I can pick at it. It might be worth picking at a little bit. Seamus Bruner is the director of research at the Government Accountability Institute. He's the author of Compromised and Fallout, and he has provided research and support for Peter Schweitzer's number one New York Times bestsellers.
Okay, so the Government Accountability Institute is something that Steve Bannon started. And Steve Bannon is the darling of the alt-right or the, you know, the right alternative media and a big promoter of Trump. So, you know, I'll pick through it. I'm not expecting to find anything that I don't really already know.
But the sections are interesting. The first is the good club, that remember the good club, Oprah Winfrey, Ted Turner, all the rich people who got together and said, there's just too many of you. And he covers the great reset, the power grab, the war on farmers, the open society scheme. He tells us to follow the money. That's always a good idea. And then he writes about mainstream mind control and the dystopian present and the end game.
And I think, you know, everybody starts where they are. And some people, even those who are presented as the darling of the alt-right media, there may be some sincerity there. But I noticed flipping through it that it's China, China, China, our enemy China. So, you know, it's not possible to really understand what's happening there.
if you persist in thinking that there is a political solution. And it is not possible to understand what's happening if you think this is a recent power grab or a recent end run around democracy or a recent capture. And no one has done a better job of explaining the
age of this agenda than Alan Watt. So this week many of you may have noticed that Donald Trump on his first day in office, his first full day, so this would be Tuesday he was inaugurated Monday, that he gave about an hour and a half
press conference PR thing that introduced something called the Stargate project. The Stargate project is an American artificial intelligence joint venture created by Open AI
SoftBank, Oracle, and investment firm MGX. The venture plans on investing up to US $500 billion in AI infrastructure in the United States by 2029. It has been planned since 2022 and was formally announced on January 21, 2025 by Donald Trump.
And it's pretty funny too, I think, because the way they named things, it couldn't ever possibly be a mistake. So they've given us the Stargate project for $500 billion worth of AI money.
And that's the Stargate Project. But Stargate Project was a secret U.S. Army unit established in 1977 at Fort Meade, Maryland, a defense intelligence agency. It was formed to investigate the potential for psychic phenomena in military and domestic intelligence applications. It had many different code names, Gondola Wish, Stargate, Grill Flame,
Sunstreak, etc. until 1991 when they were consolidated and rechristened the Stargate project. Its work was primarily involved in remote viewing, the purported ability to psychically see events, sights, or information from a great distance.
And this was handled humorously in the book and the movie, The Men Who Stare at Goats. So no coincidences here. So they're interesting characters. Some of you may know Sam Altman of OpenAI. Some of you may be familiar with the name Larry Ellison, who co-founded Oracle. He's about 80 years old, and he's been in...
Silicon Valley and tech for I don't know 45 years or longer and Masayoshi Sun who is a Japanese billionaire entrepreneur investor philanthropist etc and he is running Softbank an investment company out of Tokyo so
Musk immediately weighed in. There's been a feud for a while with Elon Musk and Sam Altman. They had a joint venture. They had a falling out. So I'll put up some articles. And if anybody is really interested in finding out more about these billionaires who are now
running everything in the United States and because they're multinational corporations and it is one big agenda, this is just the way it is. If you look in your country, if you still think of it as your country, you will find billionaires and tech being touted. That's where we are. So I say out in the open because
I've never seen anything like the lead-up to this presidential election. And Peter Thiel backing J.D. Vance, the vice president, and backing Ramaswamy, who is now the co-of-DOJ, the Department of Government Efficiency, with Elon Musk. So it's billionaires running everything, just to repeat that.
I saw this from a few days ago in the New York Times. A Trump party hosted by Peter Thiel with all of Silicon Valley. The party symbolized the euphoria of the tech industry on the cusp of the Trump presidency. The guest list included Mark Zuckerberg, Sam Altman, Miriam Adelson, and the vice president-elect, who's now the vice president, J.D. Vance.
And it has pictures of them showing up at this mansion of Peter Thiel's in Washington, D.C. on the eve, Saturday evening before the Monday inauguration. Casino mogul, they call her, Miriam Adelson, one of the richest people in the world, arrived a few minutes before the party started, only to be joined shortly after by one of the few people who is richer.
Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive of Meta. I called it Facebook, sorry.
So Miriam Adelson, in case you don't know who Sheldon Adelson was, he died several years ago, but he was a billionaire and they gave liberally hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars to Jewish and Israel causes. And also Miriam Adelson has come out as one of the largest supporters of Donald Trump.
So it's all there. It's all wrapped up in one big who's who party at Peter Thiel's mansion. Alan, in one of the bits here that I'm going to play for you, said, I really don't think that there's competition at this level. And I agree.
And again, I'm saying that, you know, no one presented things as beautifully and clearly as he did about what's really going on. If you are willing to see it, if you can see
step out of the constant narrative, the constant soap opera that tells us that these people are competing with each other and that Musk and Sam Altman are at each other's throats. And Jeff Bezos with his Blue Origin company is neck and neck with
Musk's rocket company and they're you know who's going to make it first and Bezos just had a successful launch and it's all very exciting watching these people isn't it so I I found a couple of things out though about Jeff Bezos not from the book Controligarchs but just some digging around that I was doing online and this was interesting not so much about Jeff Bezos but
but about his grandfather. The story that we get about Jeff Bezos is that his mother remarried and he was adopted by a Cuban immigrant made good. And his mother was 16 when she got pregnant and got married to an 18 year old whose last name was Jorgensen. And then she met Mike Bezos and married him and he adopted Jeff.
And they all just made good. And Jeff Bezos just kind of pulled himself up and went to school and, you know, had this great idea for an online book selling company. So this is something about his grandfather, his maternal grandfather, his mother's father. It's from a substack, Bill Taylor's substack.
Before Jeff Bezos' grandfather helped found DARPA, L.P. Gies was a high-level director at the Atomic Energy Commission.
Now, in Tragedy and Hope Book Club, we have been covering the Atomic Energy Commission quite a bit, learning about who is who and what's going on there and what they did. And I've looked at footage and so forth. So it's interesting. Jeffrey Preston Bezos' mother, Jacqueline Bezos, whose maiden name was Gies, was the daughter of Lawrence Preston Gies, L.P. Gies.
He had a fascinating career in the service of the U.S. government during the four decades following World War II. So it's an interesting story. They talk about something called NUMEC, which was the first commercial license to manufacture weapons-grade uranium. So that was awarded to NUMEC, and that was in Pennsylvania. And in 1965...
It was discovered by the Atomic Energy Commission inspectors that about 300 pounds of weapons-grade uranium, enough to make about six nuclear bombs, was discovered missing. So...
In about 1968, when the Israelis tested their first nuke, the CIA determined that the material came from the Numek plant in Apollo, and the incident became known as the Apollo Affair. I am not going to read this whole article. It's interesting in this substack, but I will...
link to it for you and then i'll just mention here that after leaving the aec the atomic energy commission in 1958 lp geese helped form the advanced research projects agency that's arpa and that has been renamed darpa and also arpa was um
ARPANET, which was like precursor early internet, had the ARPANET, the Advanced Research Projects Agency Network, and this was what they called the first wide area packet switched network with distributed control and one of the first computer networks to implement the TCP/IP protocol suite.
Both technologies became the technical foundation of the internet. Now, ARPA became DARPA, and I'm not sure when that happened, but a long time back.
And DARPA is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, a research and development agency of the U.S. Department of Defense, responsible for the development of emerging technologies for use by the military. And remember, when we're talking about billionaires who just made good all by their we selves and their ingenuity and brains,
Elon Musk's maternal grandfather was Technocracy Inc. So interesting, as Alan said, I really don't think there's competition at this level. There's one last little thing that I want to share with you before I tell you about the regex that I'm putting up. And this is a passage from a book by Jacques Attali.
And the name of the book is "A Brief History of the Future." And on the dust jacket that I have, Henry Kissinger said, "Brilliant and provocative." "A Brief History of the Future: A Brave and Controversial Look at the 21st Century."
So Jacques Attali, economist, historian, cultural critic, and one of the world's most respected political thinkers. He co-founded and served as the first president of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, etc. I think he or his son or one of them, he's also had some UN stuff, and I think there's a little bit of...
Getting your wrist slapped for arms trading in that family, but I don't have it in front of me so We can look at that later. So this is He's talking about the progression into something called First it's going to be a blend of market and democracy and this will be taken over by something he calls hyper democracy and
But he has coined a word, he has taken the word transhuman that we got from Julian Huxley and the way we think of transhuman, I think we're all familiar with that now, but he uses it in a different way. Vanguard players, I shall call them transhumans, will run. They are already running.
relational enterprises in which profit will be no more than a hindrance, not a final goal. Each of these transhumans will be altruistic, a citizen of the planet, at once nomadic and sedentary, his neighbors equal in rights and obligations, hospitable and respectful of the world." Hospitable the way Peter Thiel was when he opened up his home to his fellow billionaires.
Together, transhumanism will give birth to planetary institutions and change the course of industrial enterprises. For the benefit of each individual, they will develop essential goods, the most important being a good time. And for the general benefit, a common good whose chief dimension will be a collective intelligence. So think about that.
For the benefit of us, these transhumans, or let's just call them stinkin' rich philanthropists, are going to develop the most important essential good, a good time. Now think about that. If you've got artificial intelligence guiding your good time, as Alan would say, you could be slopping muck in a pig pen and think you're James Bond. You're having a good time.
and for the general benefit, a common good. And he writes, whose chief dimension will be a collective intelligence. Collective intelligence is the Borg. So I thought I might read a whole big chunk of that, but I am going to cut it short because I'm looking at the time and I don't want to carry on too much.
There is one other thing that I want to post, and I will tell you about it quickly. I've mentioned that I was going to be having a conversation with someone on a Telegram channel, and they were not able to be there. They had an illness in the family, and it took them out of the country and changed their schedule. He has a tech background from Silicon Valley, and his name is Aman Jabi.
And I did end up speaking with him just off air, and we had a very nice, long conversation. And we're going to have a chat that I record, hopefully not too long. I have a lot going on, and so does he on the personal front. But he has a presentation that I think is good. I think it's a very good...
recap for longtime listeners to Alan Watt and I think for people who are newly coming into this agenda because as Alan would say from time to time there are always new listeners coming in. He presents the five pillars to enslave humanity and it starts with the internet of things. The internet of things takes all that data and puts it on the cloud. That's the second pillar.
From the cloud, you have artificial intelligence. So the artificial intelligence in whatever form is taking the data and the blockchain factors in next as the fourth pillar. Blockchain technology is the thing to look at.
The crypto in a currency form is just something to talk about or trade if you feel like it. But the blockchain technology is the key to understanding this pillar to enslave humanity. And finally, all of this will work together for cybersecurity. So
All of these billionaires have something in common and the thing that they have in common besides being billionaires, one of the things that they have in common is that what they are working on is what is currently enslaving us and what will continue to rapidly increase in its enslavement capacity. So
I wanted to keep talking about that lovely book that I started reading last week, Leisure, the Basis of Culture, because there were some ideas there that I feel are so important for us that we
not allow ourselves to get caught up in this idea that we're going someplace wonderful and it's a better future with you know, whatever the PR is going to be but that we take steps back and begin to have those moments where we can have wonder and access that which makes us human and
And I was discussing this with a friend and a listener that I had this idea and I wanted to tie it in with artificial intelligence, leisure, and so forth. And so she took a stab at listening to a talk that I suggested. And I don't think she was that keen on it. And so we went back to the drawing board and I gave her another idea. And she said, yeah, that's good. And, you know...
Once I started in on that, I thought, no, that's not what I want to do because I'm always doing things last minute because that's how I work. And so I had this idea just not very long ago that what I was going to do was play like a sampler.
of different places and different talks where Alan talked about artificial intelligence. And as I got going on the project, I got more creative with it. And so I don't even know now, I haven't stopped to count it up, but there might be four or five or six different talks, seven, I'm not sure. And rather than have Alan say what day it was and start with bumper music and all that, I thought, ooh,
I am going to get some soundtrack music from different movies that have to do with artificial intelligence and I'll use those as the segue between the clips where he's talking about artificial intelligence.
And as I'm recording this audio here, I have not done the video yet. I'm hoping that I can find bits of the movies that the music comes from and just use those to illustrate where Alan is talking, even if it doesn't exactly correspond with what he's talking about. In other words, it might be more...
artistic than every image matching his words. But there was one thing that I just wanted to point out because it caught my attention and it reminded me of a conversation that I had with Alan and I thought it was kind of funny and I would share it with you. One of the clips that I'm using, I believe this is the last one because I went in order. I started in 2007 and the last clip, not that it's the last time we talked about it, but I ran out of time.
was July 21, 2019. And this is the poem that went with that. I think on the look of changes. Behavior modification. We're dwindling individuals forlorn. Going deep to resist the sleep. Living rather than conform. And when I saw that, it reminded me of when Alan wrote that title and poem.
And he said, come take a look at this. Tell me if you think people will get it. Well, already he's given me the heads up that there's something to get. So that was a huge head start. Because frankly, if he hadn't said that, I'm not sure I would have gotten it. I think on the look of changes. So I'm like, ah, cake.
Yi Qing, Yi Qing, however you say that. When before I knew anything when I was young, I would say Ai Qing, but I think most people say if they can speak the language, they say Yi Qing.
I Ching on the Book of Changes, because the I Ching is the Book of Changes. It's kind of a divination, maybe fortune-telling kind of thing. I don't know. I never got into it, but I finally did understand it. And I just remember saying something to Alan like, well, I mean, I don't think I would have gotten it if you hadn't helped me out there, but it doesn't really matter if people get it because you just entertained yourself. You had fun, so why not?
I think on the look of changes, behavior modification, we're dwindling individuals forlorn, going deep to resist the sleep, living rather than conform. And this is important.
So if you see me less or hear me less, it's not because I don't want to be here yapping at you all the time and talking about Alan and sharing his work with you. I do have some personal things that I've got to prioritize upcoming. So people, have a great week. Join us on Telegram for the next Book Club discussion on Saturday. And I will enjoy being...
able to bring you something soon. Take care. You see, this system we're going into is a feudal type system and those who run the United States and most of the western world under this new system, this new world order, don't believe in democracy whatsoever and they don't believe in human rights. They believe in classes. There are classes of types and you have the aristocracy at the top, then you have a middle helping class of bureaucracies and technocrats
and below that you have the masses according to them the lesser types, the very types that Charles Gault in Darwin was talking about that they were afraid might overtake through overpopulation they'd overtake the elite and wipe them out so they decided to wipe out the masses instead
And that's where we're heading towards. The same guys that had death squads all over Latin America and special forces all over the world slaughtering for the last 50 years are now in charge. And they plan to reduce the population of this entire global plantation of theirs down to a more manageable level. We see it all around us as coming. They've thrown off the sham of democracy, and now they're showing us the iron fist.
Yeah. And this is a real reality that is striking home right now. Their plan is moving toward literally Arthur C. Clarke's 2010 Space Odyssey. Tell us about how some of this predictive programming, some of the materials that are going back literally half a century or more, are being played out
literally in our day right now with actual policies from the International Monetary Fund, the globalization of currencies, the chipping of the populations here in America and over in China, the largest two economies on the planet. Tell how this is all coming together. Well, this is stuff which they put out in science fiction.
beginning around the nineteen thirties without the hoxley's brief new world for the talked about creating new types of purpose needs ideal design i_d_ has other that's other meaning of high-d_ aside you'll design uh... type of human and uh... this in the nineteen thirties he was talking about genetic engineering a whole a whole society of worker bees and it was followed up in the fifties through the future is society that all science fiction writers all the
big ones that you hear of are members of the Futurist Society. The Futurist Society, the top is composed of members of top think tanks that run the world system and they give us predictive programming. They choose the authors, they tell them what to write about and make it exciting for the youngsters. And when you read what's to come, in other words through science fiction, because it's familiar to you, you think it's a natural progression. It doesn't don you
that humankind can go off in a thousand directions, we think we're evolving naturally step by step towards this brave new world. That's called predictive programming. Isaac Asimov was one of the big ones who did all the work on the robots of the future and the cyborgs and the interfacing of human and machine. And now we see it, of course, we're talking about marriage partners in the future who will be mechanical, basically, or very much like
the movie artificial intelligence yeah they've asked other news article yesterday with a talking about this with actual scientists are both marriage
of people marrying robots by 2050. I mean, this is fusion with technology. It's creating a hellish matrix that's literally right out of the movie, and it is very real. They're talking about nanotechnologies to completely re-engineer human lifespan. I know about technologies that are not transhuman. I mean, we're talking about simply improving biology, correcting gene structure problems, correcting the damage and repair of the tissues that can extend human lifespan without changing the very nature of what we are.
We're not talking about transhumanism, but the transhumanists literally want to merge with technology and eliminate 90% of the world population. Yes, and what they're using too is to put doubt in your head about certain things, certain norms, as you call them. And there are certain norms in the world that cannot be changed or they're destroyed. Everything is destroyed when you change real norms, the fundamental norms.
and they've done a darn good job of destroying the family unit and people now are pretty well isolated from each other. They live on computers and communicate through computers in their little boxes all separately from each other. They're on cell phones. It's called a cell phone because you're in a cell. You're a good little worker. Be separate from the rest. That's the hard part in this world is through the transition people are trying to hold on to what they think is normal.
in a time when all the normal has been already destroyed, we're in flux. And when you're in flux, eventually you'll find all new kinds of new norms are brought forth from the top because all culture is coordinated at the top and promoted downwards to the public who simply adapt it to their own lives, adapt the opinions, the views, and all the rest of it.
And that's why we're in flux. We're in flux now because it was intended that all the old world, everything that used to be, has to be destroyed. And we'll have to be all accepting. That's the key to it. All accepting of everything. And that means never-ending acceptance of everything, that it becomes new. And when new types of humans and so on are presented to the public, they've already been conditioned through movies and fiction,
to accept it. After all, we're all human. So it says, even with the movie Artificial Intelligence, we saw that theme being pushed over and over and over again. And the Millennium Man, I think it was called as well, with Robin Williams. I had the same idea to get the message across to the public, what is human? We have trans this and trans that, and now it's going into post-humanism and trans-humanism.
as the old type supposedly dies away and to the average person they think we're just evolving and it's happening as science just opens pages and finds things out for the first time and nothing is further from the truth the sciences that are published to the public and what they apparently discover were known a long long time ago even with genetics that is why in the 1920s
The big players were very confident, published lots of books on the coming society, the eugenical society, where everyone would be programmed scientifically and also eventually it would all lead into a eugenics program with people who are allowed to breed and those who are not allowed to breed.
No normality exists, you see. There is no normality. Anything goes, then society is in flux. You have no normal to compare anything with. And so you have no objections to what's put in front of you, what comes up next, or even what they want to do with you, ultimately.
That's very simple. And eventually there'll be all kinds of different humanoid type creatures. We saw that in the movie Artificial Intelligence. That was part of that. The wicked humans who had a kind of circus for obsolete robot type humans. And they killed them all in the circus for entertainment. People were bad. Humans were bad. And they said that as long as the human mindset...
is there with certain emotions and qualities, then anything can be classified as human. So all these movies, all these shows are part of predictive programming and we never catch on, we never catch on. It's quite... I always say you cannot watch anything and enjoy it, you must study it clinically. Everything must be studied clinically and you'll find out very quickly if you can do that, if you can actually learn that art.
you'll know what they want to leave in your mind. And it's not just to make you happy and pass a couple of hours. It's to implant certain topics within your mind and also give you the conclusions about those topics as well. And that's how it's done. There's an interesting little article here. It's from the Information Week business technology network. Air Force seeks non-lethal city stopper.
Posted by George Hume, December 7th, 2008.
These weapons, just like the HAARP technologies, too, they used them in Gulf War I. That was in the British newspapers. These weapons are designed to shut down cities as well as military communications and weapon systems, not physically destroy them, but they can destroy them, too.
This is well only electrical parts. The U.S. military already has EMP, that's electromagnetic pulse capabilities, but it looks like based on this Air Force solicitation published in the past couple of days, they're about to get more tactical. Combatant commanders...
have expressed desires from additional military options against a variety of electronic systems that are used in military, industrial, civil and asymmetrical applications to provide viable military options to the COCOMs, they call this whole bunch, the Air Force Research Laboratory Directed Energy Directorate's High Power Microwave Division. That's a long term, isn't it? But it's pulsed energy weapons.
seeking to develop and demonstrate the capability and operational utility of a high-power microwave aerial demonstrator. And I'll put the link for that up as well at the end of the show. I'll go to the callers now. I've got Sam from Australia on the line here. There's Sam. Hey, Alan. How are you? I'm hanging in here.
That's good. Listen, I sent you a link just before the show. I just thought your listeners might want to know about it as well. It's an article in today's Sydney Morning Herald, and it's titled, Scientists Develop Way to Display Thoughts. Now, this Japanese research team has come up with a way to basically screen thoughts
your thoughts onto a computer screen. And it's an amazing article to read through because it talks about how that can basically read your mind. Not only can that read your mind...
Because years ago they had, and it has been demonstrated on CBC television with Nick Biggidge on Wendy Mesley's show, and Biggidge also demonstrated it in the European Parliament.
The politicians there, these little gadgets the CIA had back in the 50s, which could put thoughts directly into your head. Now, to understand the technology and the brainwave patterns and so on, to put thoughts into your head electronically, you've got to understand it could be a two-way street, you see. But they had this gadgetry back in the 50s.
No, absolutely. And look, I've been following this kind of technology for a while. You know, I've always been, you know, I started off as, well, what you'd term as a cyberpunk writer. And so I was heavily into looking at this kind of stuff. But it's, yeah, it's scary. So if you look at the fact that now they've got the RFID chip, they've got the brain chip,
They've got ways to actually broadcast feelings or emotions into your brain. They know now they're announcing, that's what's worrying. When they're announcing it, the technology is not that far off to be released.
they're basically your thoughts. There's nowhere to hide. Combine that with nanotechnology, the fact that they can actually put that in your food, theoretically, put it in your food, it can grow, you know, they can start building a computer inside your brain so you don't even have to get it surgically inserted. And I think that's going to be the big thing. You've just got to, you know, they're going to offer you a brain chip
That will come. There's no doubt at all. There's a whole bunch of articles I have here that I haven't read over the air on that very thing of promoting the brain chip by very well-known people who are obviously getting paid to do it. But they said at the 2001 meeting at Loyola University in the United States, this world science meeting, they said they already have it ready to go. That was in 2001, the brain chip. They
They said they have centralized computer, regionalized computers ready to control millions of people. Each region's got these super computers, these create computers set up to control the people. They said the only problem we have now is to convince the public to want it, to take it.
And they said that they will overcome this over the next few years with propaganda through media, novels, movies, and aiming at the children. They'll think it's very exciting. And so it's just a matter of time now until we're all ready to accept it.
Absolutely, and I can already see how they can sell it. I mean, the fact is that what you see is the World Wide Web, the net, the matrix at the moment. That's all converging. I mean, if you have a chip in your brain that alters your perception of reality, then your perception will be your reality. And the big question is who is going to be controlling that? I mean...
are we going to trust these guys? Well, they've already made it quite clear that it's not to help. The top meetings, it's not put out to help the people. They'll literally reprogram the people. You could be a carpenter one day and a surgeon the next, but you won't know, and you'll have no memory of who you are or even the sentience of being an individual. They stated there will be no more individualism. In fact, what they said was it will be impossible for a person to even...
perceive or think of themselves as an individual once they have this chip inserted.
That's right. And so once you have this, you're going to be a sitting duck. They can do whatever they want with you. They have complete control over how you perceive reality. Exactly. This is quite frightening. Anyway, I thought I'd just bring your attention to that. Yes. It's quite cool. Thanks for calling. Thanks for calling. Thanks again. Yeah, that's true. And...
As I say, they have been promoting it through movies and cartoons, and the youngsters think that they're going to get wonderful chips to make them superhuman. Remember, artificial intelligence means artificial. Artificial means not real. It's a fake. It's not the real thing. Personally, I'd rather have the real thing. And that's the thing you're born with. And everything's about power today, for the managed, expertly run society. Now here is...
an article from the National Science and Technology Council. It's got a National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan. It was from last year. Artificial intelligence is a transformative technology. And this is the age of change, transformation. The 21st century was to be the century of all this was to happen. Everything that ever planned in sociology and all the rest of it in the sciences, social science, were to be fulfilled in the managed society.
Anyway, it's a transformative technology that holds promise for tremendous societal and economic benefits. It has the potential to revolutionize how we live. Artificial intelligence, remember. How we live. Agenda 21, 21st century. 2030 and so on. Work, learn, discover and communicate. It can further our national priorities, including increased economic prosperity, yeah, for those who own all.
Improved educational opportunities, meaning if you go along with all the opinions you're given in education, you'll succeed. If you have a mind of your own, you probably won't. And quality of life, an enhanced national and homeland security, because they'll know everything that everybody's doing.
Because of these potential benefits, the US government has invested in artificial intelligence research for many years. Yet, as with any significant technology in which the federal government has interest, there are not only tremendous opportunities, but also a number of considerations that must be taken into account in guiding the overall direction of federally funded research and development in artificial intelligence. So we're paying for all this stuff. All the countries are paying for this.
We always pay for our own change, you might say. Our chains and our change. Because we're to be changed by all. On May 3, 2016, the administration announced the formation of a new NSTC subcommittee on machine learning and artificial intelligence to help coordinate federal activity in artificial intelligence. And they've got strategic plans and objectives for where it's to go. Always dressed up in benefits to society and so on.
So they want to make long-term investments in artificial intelligence research, develop effective methods for human and artificial intelligence collaboration. Rather than replace humans, it says most artificial intelligence systems will collaborate with humans to achieve optimal performance. Really?
Well, who's designing what is optimal performance? Right now, you could go into a mind wipe, you might say, and come out and you'd be utterly politically correct and see all the new in vogue things and you'll be improved. They'll call you improved. Researchers need to create effective interactions between humans and artificial intelligence systems. You're going to be spied on about everything you do. It's bad enough already, but it's going to be an awful lot worse.
understand and address the ethical, legal and societal implications of artificial intelligence. They expect it to behave according to the formal and informal norms to which we hold our fellow humans.
Researchers need to understand the ethical, legal and social implications and to develop methods for designing systems that align with ethical, legal and societal goals. Well, who decides what the ethical goals are? You can also see the changes we're going through now. We don't decide this. It's all given from the top down. Legal, same thing. And societal goals, who decides what societal goals should be?
I mean, those at the top already, in the scientific realms, believe that they should decide what the societal goals are, how you behave, or how you think, what your opinions are, and all the rest of it. Ensure the safety and security of artificial intelligence systems. Develop shared public data sets and environments for artificial intelligence training and testing. We're always getting tested on us, naturally. And measure and evaluate the technologies and so on.
But again, it'll all work out properly because eventually remember, as we know, private property will all be owned. The private property will still be there, but only for the big moguls that will own them internationally across the world, streets and cities in fact, eventually. That's the plan folks. Don't forget, January 21 for the whole 21st century is the end of private property and the end of course of private transportation.
things start to tie together when you understand it. There's even an article that says in Australia you can't afford a house in a big Aussie yet in a city. Buy an island paradise instead. It'll only set you back $385,000 which is half the price of the average small house in some of the big cities in Australia. Ridiculous, but there you go.
as we focus for reality. Also whoever leads artificial intelligence will rule the world and that was President Putin to the Russian children on Knowledge Day and I guess on national television. And of course the ones who already have been chosen to rule the world through AI are showing their teeth now. It isn't just private individuals etc doing it. Although they'll all play their part even to their peer group because that's how
People behave in society, even the persecutors of society will all be PC in their own little worlds of virtue. They have special virtue above everybody else. That's why they have to keep you online.
an article from even june google staff keep the blacklist of conservative and fringe sites it's been admitted to of course and they've been showing their teeth isn't just google it's it's the consortium of this superstructure that said obviously to me to me my mind they're all connected maybe even under wonder one it could be one monopoly basically runs all of these things has to be
I really think they definitely have to interact with each other on so many levels. Another article called Future Work Technology 2050 Global Scenarios. This is from the Millennium Project. I'll put articles up on what they are. So a UN group across the world, actually, through universities. They help, again, coordinate. Everything's coordinated into the oneness system, isn't it?
to standardize everything. Across the whole planet, everything has to be standardized for the new culture that's being brought in internationally and planned for you and what it is, etc. You had no say in the matter at all. The only participation you have is, as I say, you acquiesce, you accept it through your silence and your use of it all. You help it all to happen. But
You'd wish to be a sentient human being. You would at least demand to know what's going on from the characters that are doing it all and why they're doing it. But put this up too and it gives you a lot of what's planned for the future work-wise up to the year 2050 and also what will happen on the way up to that year too.
of how many unemployed they'll be, etc. And eventually how many folk will have to stay unemployed and just get paid by the state. The very thing that Bert and Russell talked about with their credits getting dished to them. And you've got to behave because you're monitored as to what you do with the same thing and so on. Article 2, about themselves, the Millennium Project, what they are. It's a think tank established in 1996 under the American Council of
for the 19 nations university that became independent 2009 and has grown to 63 nodes around the world everything is standardized and we pay for all and it's to improve thinking about the future and make that thinking available well you have no say in it folks you're supposed to just adapt it's all done though isn't it they know where they're taking you with all the behaviors and psychologists
But when you hear people, for instance, really screaming about Trump okaying almost about half a million workers in high tech from India, yeah, they should be training them here, absolutely, etc., etc. But they're looking to more. It's more than just that. They're bringing them in from India knowing, you see, that the workers from India still have family values.
See, yours have been destroyed deliberately, but those from India will have strong traditional family values and they will bring in wives or decide because they choose wives and so on. And they'll have big families and they will definitely produce a crop because that's what we are.
the pressing crop's dying off, they'll bring in a crop of workers for the future because they're not getting produced in the West here. Everybody's running around in their tight pants and getting covered in tattoos and
and playing themselves you see they're not having children because that's what they've been trained to do and how you think and so on not to have children not to get married there's been a war on the west for a long time and so many of the big players as i said for instance that like the the maury strong were quite open about it they had a hatred an absolute hatred for for for western people
and the societies they'd built. They've got the biggest curse on the earth, etc., etc. Hasn't changed. And there's elements behind this too that I won't go into here, but it's to do with an occultic system. Even the folk who think they're in it today don't even understand because they're low level. Even if they think they're high level, there's much, much higher levels. But I don't know. It's completely intertwined with what's happening today.
The things that are happening and it right down to even the necessity for population reduction etc That's that is not a new and youth concept at all. So those who are complete existentialists like Wiener was with his cybernetics and the human use of human beings That one he wrote to he was definitely existentialist but you so you have them and then you have all the people down below who go along and
And they play with what they call the New Age allowable and push promoted through television for years and years and years. They call it spirituality. Fine. Fine candles and things and cardboard with paintings on them and stuff like that. It's fine, fine, fine, folks. But you don't know what's behind it at the top, do you? And the big players from the past were really involved and you have no idea.
It's so sad, so sad that people think they're making their own decisions. Everything's got a purpose, even down to the fashion of the things you wear.
because that will that's not kidding you you look at some of them who and they're also proud of how skinny they are they look like anorexic a lot of people i'm not kidding you and it isn't just uh pictures and newspapers and our magazines it's in their own areas even in this side where you'll see it too how they all copy something that's put out for them to copy and they want to be all be the same so i don't want to be a little different you know and yeah
And then they'll start becoming anorexic to fit into all these clothing to look really good because being anorexic is the look now. There's all these stories about vegans and veganism and now they have these paid little armies of NGOs again to attack farmers across the world. And getting away with it folks. That's because it's the agenda and that's what's getting promoted. And you'll be good, good, good when they can hardly see you. You'll be so skinny.
But you're eating all the right things. You're told to eat like your cricket burgers. Remember the cricket burgers? That was a big thing when you pushed and so on. And no meat. You have Laika meats. That's okay. Laika meats, you know. Fake stuff and so on. Because that's all. Your masters have decreed that's the way it's going to be. And they've decreed that you're good if you do what you're told. And most folk definitely will. And they want good social credit scores.
And even though I'm saying it in a jocular fashion, I'm dead serious about it. That's what it's all for. Absolutely. And the people at the top who will probably penalize me for saying all this stuff, and I do get this, will make my life a bit of a hell because they're completely intolerant because this is a totalitarian system you're living in, folks. It is totalitarian. Absolutely. Absolutely. Absolutely. No doubt about it. But everything's the same now, you see. Because you must consent. You must consent.
You see, like Huxley said, you must consent to love your servitude because you're owned, understand. If you use all the stuff you're owned and they have authority over you and they can make your life hell or they can actually close down your life. I'm not kidding you. I'm not kidding you, folks. Think about it. This article, Elon Musk's Neuralink plans to hook humans' brains directly to computers, it says.
He's an entrepreneur. He's a businessman, right? Not an inventor. He says brain chip will ultimately achieve a sort of symbiosis with artificial intelligence. Well, there's your cybernetics right there. This is all from years and years and years ago. Now is the time to bring these people forward to implement them, you see. There you go.
artificial intelligence. So the startup called Neuralink has made its first major public announcement revealing flexible threads designed to link a human brain directly to a computer and so on and so on. They float the idea every so often, even in movies, but it's here. It's because it's here. And these people are really, they're fronts as far as I can see. They're not inventors. They're just put out there with fronting the money basically.
to make it all happen. But a lot of their funding is actually government-backed as well, isn't it? They don't use... Even whoever the backing money is, it's generally coming from government too. The gods, the hidden masters, eh, coming forward, eh? But they're not the masters either. MUSIC PLAYS
♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪
♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪
♪♪