We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Special Coverage: Trump's New Global Tariffs Spare No Country

Special Coverage: Trump's New Global Tariffs Spare No Country

2025/4/2
logo of podcast Bloomberg Talks

Bloomberg Talks

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
D
Doug Ford
S
Sarah Bianchi
S
Scott Bessent
特朗普提名的财政部长候选人,曾任乔治·索罗斯对冲基金高级管理人,推崇减少预算赤字、放松监管和增加能源生产的经济政策。
Topics
Joe Matthew 和 Kaylee Lyons: 报道了特朗普政府对所有贸易伙伴征收10%基准关税,并对贸易逆差大的60个国家额外征收“对等”关税的新闻。这些关税基于美国计算出的这些国家对美国商品征收的关税和非关税壁垒,并仅收取计算值的一半。具体关税数据显示,中国将面临34%的关税,欧盟为20%,日本为24%,越南为46%。 Scott Bessent: 建议各国不要恐慌或采取报复行动,因为只要不报复,这就是关税上限。美国对其他国家征收的关税有一个上限,之后可以再商讨下限。许多国家已经就关税问题与美国联系,但总统可能会先让局势稳定一段时间再做决定。对中国的关税可能超过50%,因为除了新的关税外,还有20%的芬太尼关税。中国出口芬太尼前体化学品导致美国人死亡,必须停止。美国可能利用与中国的贸易重新调整来谈判,例如抖音等问题,以及人民币汇率。目前美国正专注于关税和税收法案,之后才会与中国进行双边关系谈判,目前没有计划访问北京。他不参与关税谈判,所以不知道4月9日之前是否会进行谈判。他不确定为什么加拿大和墨西哥没有出现在总统展示的关税图表中。股市回调与政府支出减少的“解毒期”无关,而是因为政府支出过高不可持续。美国正在减少政府支出,增加私营部门就业,这可能导致经济指标出现波动,但总体经济仍然强劲。他不关注盘后市场波动,并认为股市下跌与“让美国再次伟大”政策无关。共和党对税收法案的修改意见出奇一致,这得益于特朗普总统的领导。税收法案的修改可能在周六之前完成。税收法案的修改可能包括取消小费税、社保税以及购买美国汽车的回扣等内容。税收法案的修改还包括购买美国汽车的利息可抵税。可以通过削减开支来弥补税收法案修改带来的赤字。税收法案修改可能与提高债务上限有关。税收法案修改的目标是在债务上限达到临界点之前完成。关税既可以增加收入,也可以作为与贸易伙伴谈判的筹码。关税收入不会计入美国国会预算办公室的评分,但会作为背景运行。税收法案修改不需要依赖关税收入,政府还可以通过削减开支来弥补。关税收入和削减开支都不会计入美国国会预算办公室的评分。消费者情绪低迷,通胀预期上升,一些银行下调了GDP预期,这可能导致美联储降息。他认为目前经济仍然强劲,消费者情绪低迷并没有转化为实际行动。他对目前的经济数据并不担心,因为经济仍然强劲。企业高管没有向他表达担忧。除了税收法案和关税外,他还关注乌克兰协议、对伊朗的制裁以及对金融机构的放松管制。 Sarah Bianchi: 美国对许多国家(包括中国、越南和欧盟)实施的高关税将对进口产生重大影响,可能导致美国进口商品的加权平均关税接近30%。美国对所有贸易伙伴征收的关税将达到前所未有的水平。市场对关税的预期可能低于实际情况,企业将努力适应新的关税政策。在4月9日之前达成新的贸易协议不太现实,因为总统提到的问题非常复杂。与其他国家达成新的贸易协议需要很长时间,因为需要解决关税和非关税壁垒等复杂问题。预计需要很长时间才能与欧盟和中国等主要贸易伙伴达成新的贸易协议。要求其他国家取消关税或非关税壁垒比说起来容易做起来难,特别是对于那些依赖关税收入的国家。取消非关税壁垒比取消关税更复杂,因为这需要立法机构的参与。欧盟等国家取消非关税壁垒比较困难,因为这涉及到多个国家和不同的利益。拜登政府保留了特朗普政府的关税,甚至提高了一些关税,但特朗普政府的关税政策是全球性的,这与拜登政府的做法不同。特朗普政府的关税政策与拜登政府的不同之处在于,特朗普政府的政策是全球性的,即使是对盟友也是如此。关税政策难以取消,因此一些关税可能会长期存在。美国加权平均关税不会回到3%的水平。取消免税额对一些行业来说影响很大,但该政策可能存在变数。取消免税额的政策可能存在变数。取消免税额对一些行业(如低价服装行业)影响很大。 Doug Ford: 加拿大对美国新关税政策持谨慎乐观态度,因为加拿大和墨西哥没有被列入受影响国家名单。加拿大和墨西哥没有被列入受影响国家名单,这表明两国合作良好。鉴于加拿大没有被列入受影响国家名单,加拿大不应采取报复措施。加拿大不应采取报复措施,而应与美国保持良好关系,共同建设一个繁荣的北美地区。他希望美国和加拿大都能降低关税,但这可能演变成一场“胆量游戏”。美国和加拿大是邻居,应该保持良好关系,共同应对来自中国的挑战。加拿大将与美国政府合作,以了解新关税政策对加拿大意味着什么。他对美国对汽车进口征收25%关税表示担忧,这将影响汽车零部件的跨境运输。美国对汽车征收关税将增加美国消费者的成本,因为汽车零部件在美加之间多次往返。美加两国汽车产业高度一体化,加拿大向美国出口的汽车中,50%的零部件来自美国。美加两国人民和经济高度一体化,两国应该保持良好关系。他认为加拿大和美国应该保持良好关系,并希望在后关税时代重建贸易关系。他不喜欢与任何人发生个人冲突,包括特朗普总统。美加两国应该保持团结,共同应对来自其他国家的挑战。他与美国商务部长霍华德·卢特尼克关系良好,并希望卢特尼克在确保加拿大不被列入受影响国家名单方面发挥了作用。他与美国商务部长霍华德·卢特尼克关系良好,并尊重他的工作。美加贸易谈判将由加拿大总理领导,各省也会参与其中。他希望保持现有的USMCA协议。他希望加拿大可以向美国供应关键矿物。加拿大和美国应该保持良好关系,并加强贸易合作。他对白宫的声明既不感到意外,也不感到被背叛。他对特朗普总统的商业行为方式表示理解。加拿大拥有丰富的自然资源,可以向美国供应石油、电力和关键矿物。他对美国可能对木材和关键矿物征收关税表示担忧。对木材、汽车和药品征收关税将增加美国消费者的成本。他认为美加两国应该在木材、汽车和药品等领域加强合作,避免征收关税。

Deep Dive

Chapters
President Trump announced new tariffs, imposing a 10% base rate on all trading partners. Additional "reciprocal" tariffs, based on levies imposed by other countries on US goods, will also apply. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discusses the potential for negotiations before the April 9th implementation date.
  • 10% base tariff on all trading partners
  • Additional reciprocal tariffs based on other countries' levies on US goods
  • China faces a 34% rate, EU 20%, Japan 24%, Vietnam 46%
  • Potential for negotiations before April 9th implementation

Shownotes Transcript

When you have bars in the sky, onboard showers and award-winning in-flight entertainment, it's no surprise that Emirates was recently named the best airline in the world. We fly you to over 140 destinations and with partners across the globe, we connect you to another 1,700 cities across six continents. So when we say we're also the largest international airline, what we really mean is...

If you're going there, so are we. Book now on Emirates.com. Fly Emirates. Fly better. When your company has a professional position to fill, are you really seeing the best candidates? You may be missing an untapped resource. Ideal candidates not currently job searching.

People not actively looking, but who may be open to the right opportunity. It can be the difference between a good hire and a great hire. Specialized Recruiting Group is ready to find the top talent you need. Go to srgpros.com right now to get started. How can you grow your business from idea to industry leader? Bring your vision to life with smart business buying tools and technology from Amazon Business. From

from fast, free shipping to in-depth buying insights and automated purchase approvals. They deliver everything you need to achieve your goals. It's not easy to stand out from the crowd. Simplify how you stock up to get ahead. Go to AmazonBusiness.com for support. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News. This is a breaking news update from Bloomberg.

Instant reaction and analysis from our 3,000 journalists and analysts around the world. I'm Joe Matthew alongside Kaylee Lyons in Washington. Kaylee, we finally have some, if not all, clarity on what's going on.

Indeed, as you mentioned, a 10 percent base rate on all trading partners will be imposed and then other countries will face additional charges, reciprocal charges that include non-tariff barriers in the White House calculation that the White House contends it is being lenient here by charging those countries a reciprocal rate only half.

of what the U.S. has calculated is charged on U.S. imports by those countries. So some examples from the graphics that the White House included in this announcement, China will face a rate of 34 percent, obviously, that is materially higher than the 20 percent tariffs, which already were in effect.

on Chinese products. It'll be a 20 percent rate on the European Union, 24 percent tariffs on Japan. For Vietnam, the reciprocal rate is 46 percent. And of course, Joe, we are seeing markets react in accordance with this news as you are seeing currencies and stocks, at least futures, on the move.

Just coming off that announcement from the president announcing a baseline tariff around the United States, as well as reciprocal tariffs on certain trading partners. I'm joined by Treasury Secretary Scott Besson. Mr. Besson, Mr. Secretary, thank you so much for joining Bloomberg TV. So we're going to have the baseline tariffs come into effect first, then the reciprocal tariffs, a little bit more of a different rate for each individual trading partner.

Are you preparing to negotiate with some of these trading partners before that tariff rate comes into effect on April 9th? Well, I think there have been a lot of discussions, but I think we're just going to have to wait and see what would happen. What I would say, Anne-Marie, is I would advise none of the countries to panic. I wouldn't try to retaliate because...

because as long as you don't retaliate, this is the high end of the number. And I think the market could have certainty that this is the number barring retaliation. So we've got a ceiling.

And then we can see if there's a different floor. So you sound like you're ready for negotiation with a number of these partners. Has the European Union, has China, has India, have these countries reached out? Well, they've all reached out, but it's going to be up to President Trump to see what he wants to do. I think the mindset might be to let things settle for a while.

Their tariffs or non-tariff barriers have been on a long time. So we'll see where it goes from here. When it comes to China, they have a much higher rate on this list. On top of that, there's still that 20 percent fentanyl tariff rate. Is all of this coming together to be more than a 50 percent tariff rate for Beijing? Well, yes, I think it is. And I think it's a combination of things. And, you know, again, that

I think China said today that solving the fentanyl crisis depends on taking off the fentanyl tariffs, and I'm pretty sure that's not the way the sequencing is going to work. They're exporting the precursor chemicals and...

every day, every week, every month, Americans are dying and it's going to have to stop. When it comes to places like China, the president has mentioned he's willing to even look at things like TikTok to potentially do a negotiation with them when it comes to tariffs. I'm sure you're looking at things like the yuan. What's on the table when it comes to this trade realignment between Beijing and Washington? Well, we haven't started anything yet. We've been busy with the

with the tariffs. I've been busy, as we talked about earlier. The tax bill is going very well. So I think that we will move toward the bilateral relationship with China now that we've done the multilateral tariffs. Plans for conversations or a trip to Beijing? Nothing eminent.

When it comes to this negotiation, April 9th, these tariffs come in place. Do you plan on having negotiations before that date? Again, I'm not part of the negotiations. So, you know, we'll see.

I am sure that there are going to be a lot of calls. I just don't know if they're going to be negotiations. The president had this huge chart showing all of the different rates. Canada and Mexico notably missing on that chart. Why is that? I'm not sure. Not sure. Okay, I imagine that has to do potentially because they're already in negotiations previously with the 25%. I'm not sure if you saw the initial market reaction. I haven't.

So, equity futures slid on the news. You had talked about how we're in a detox period. Do you feel that we're still in that period or are you starting to get a little bit concerned? Well, the detox period has nothing to do with the tariffs. The detox period is...

off this incredible level of government spending that we've had, an unsustainable amount of fiscal stimulus. And look, that's got to stop. That's got to stop. So, yeah, can we continue weaning ourselves off of that? And as we see public sector borrowing go down, private sector borrowing go up,

Public sector jobs come down. Private sector jobs go up. Is it going to be perfectly symmetrical? No. But we did see an increase of 10,000 manufacturing jobs last month. So, it doesn't concern you today that during the tariff announcement, equity futures sold off when initially they were rallying when the president only announced a 10 percent tariff base, and then they fell when he announced the higher rates for things like the European Union and China?

And, Maria, I've learned not to look what goes on in after-hours markets. Okay. But since the peaks in February, stocks are down 8%. I think the NASDAQ from its high most recently is down 12%. So far, though...

these kind of—this kind of market downdraft so far this year is not concerning you? Well, look, in my old business, I was very concerned about market movements, and I'm trying to be a secretary of treasury, not a market commentator. What I would point out is that especially the NASDAQ peaked on deep-seek day. So, that's a MAG-7 problem, not a MAGA problem.

Okay, so let's talk about what else you've been spending a lot of your time doing. You have been up on Capitol Hill constantly. You are really working on trying to make sure that this administration can extend the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. On top of that, more tax cuts. Right now, how are the conversations going in Congress? Well, I actually think the most underreported story in Washington, not by Bloomberg, of course, is the incredible unanimity

unity amongst Republicans. And I think it's President Trump's leadership. But Mike Johnson, with a very narrow margin, issued the reconciliation instructions. And then he also passed a clean, continuing resolution on the Senate side. They are very attentive. And I think they may have something done by this Saturday.

This Saturday. Okay, that's the start of it, though. That's the start. You recently talked about how you think it's not just going to be tax on tips. No tax on tips. That gets added to this bill. You think reconciliation can include a plethora of what the president has talked about. No tax on tips. No tax on Social Security. Also recently talking about rebates if you buy an American car. How did you get all of that?

this done? The deductibility of interest if you buy an American car, which I'm older than you are, but when I bought my first car, the interest was deductible, but now it's got to be only on American cars. So how do you do all this at the same time that

Market participants, budget fiscal hawks, budget hawks in Congress are concerned about the deficit. How are you going to have this big reconciliation package? Well, I think, as we've seen, there's a lot of room to cut spending. So I think, again, where Republicans have incredible unity is on the spending cuts, as we're seeing.

So, when it comes to the timeline of all of this, I do notice that now reconciliation, it seems to be an agreement between the House and the Senate that they're willing to consider about raising the debt ceiling. Mm-hmm.

So, do you plan on getting this bill done before the X date, which the CBO is saying could be the middle of the summer or September? Well, Anne-Marie, I think you just answered the question for yourself, because if debt ceiling is solved via reconciliation, then it has to be done before we hit the X date. And we're going to go on to the warning track sometime in May or June. So, that's when you plan to get this tax bill done?

That's a goal. So if we could put both these stories together today, the president comes out with tariffs. You're working on the tax plan. He talks about tariffs being revenue raisers to offset the tax bill you're working on. At the same time, you and the president also talk about a negotiation you're willing to do to get reciprocity when it comes to other trading partners. How can it be both revenue raising and a negotiation? Well,

To the extent that the tariffs are higher than what we had, it will raise revenues. And, you know, as far as the negotiations, we'll see. And, you know, I could tell you, though, it's not going to be possible to include the tariffs in the CBO scoring. So that will be something running in the background. And as the president said, we've taken in several hundred billion dollars on the China tariffs. But those those don't get scored.

Do you feel that you need to have enough revenue raised from these tariffs before this reconciliation package comes to play in Congress? Well, I don't think we have to have the revenues raised. And look, you know, we're doing two things. Tariffs are going to raise revenues. And then we're also the—

stamping out waste, fraud, and abuse in the government and bringing down the expenses and spending. And we're not going to get credit for either of those with the CBO scoring. So when your audience, when American people see these CBO scores, they could be large, but there is a substantial amount of tariff income. There's a substantial amount of savings.

While all this is happening, consumer sentiment has definitely taken a bit of a dive. Expectations for inflation have gone up. Banks like Goldman are cutting their GDP forecast, saying potentially the Fed is going to have to cut rates, not the good kind of cuts, the kind of cuts because they're nervous about growth.

How concerned are you that the timing of all this is going to be incredibly challenging because of how the American consumer, how corporate America is feeling at this moment? Well, it tells me a couple of things. One, we've got to get the tax bill done quickly, because that's a confidence builder. And two, we're seeing sentiment surveys from the American people, but we haven't actually seen them take action.

the households actually thought that there were going to be, if their real inflation expectations had increased, what would they be doing? They'd be hoarding goods and they would be demanding wage increases. And neither one of those has happened yet. So at the moment, you're not concerned about some of the soft data we're seeing? No, I see nothing. And one of the

great things, many great things about being a treasury is we have lots of business people come through and everything we're seeing in the economy is still very solid.

And executives haven't voiced any of these concerns onto you? No, there's some idiosyncratic things. But in terms of the expectations actually turning into hard data, none of them have seen it yet. Now that you're working on the tax bill, and of course tariffs at the moment are out of the way, what else is on the agenda for you for the rest of the year? Well, we have a Ukraine deal that's coming up.

We've gone to maximum pressure on Iran, so a big part of Treasury is national security. And then we are doing a big push on deregulating in a smart, safe and sound way the regulated financial institutions, which is going to allow for the private sector, not the government sector, to grow.

When it comes to international, where are you with Ukraine and the mineral deal? I believe we may have a team from Ukraine coming over as soon as the end of this week or the beginning of next week. Ukrainians have, I believe that they've hired counsel. And what we did was after the incident in the White House office,

on, I believe it was February 28th, we were going to sign a four-page deal that was parameters of understanding. And at Treasury, we took the opportunity to move forward to the big deal. So this is the exact same deal that would have resulted from the four-page signature deal. So we've just...

fast-forwarded, and we didn't want to lose any time because we believe this deal is so important for the American people, for the Ukrainian people, and for the peace process. So it sounds like in the next two weeks, you're going to have this deal over the finish line.

It's ready on our side. When it comes to Iran, since you mentioned that, and I know you're going to be focused a lot on international aspects, now the tariffs are done and you have the tax deals underway. When it comes to Iran, do you think we could see secondary tariffs, secondary sanctions? Well, we've already seen sanctions. For the first time, U.S. Treasury sanctioned a so-called teapot refinery, which is a private sector refinery in China.

And they are the buyers of the Iranian oil. And we could see more of that. Wow. Interesting. Treasury Secretary Scott Besant, you've been very generous with your time today. We really appreciate it here at Bloomberg TV. Thank you so much. Good to see you. Good to see you.

Adding her voice to the conversation now is Sarah Bianchi, chief strategist of international political affairs at Evercore ISI and former deputy U.S. trade representative under the Biden administration. Sarah, it's always great to have you here on Bloomberg TV and radio. When we consider the kind of levels we are talking about here, at least for some countries, China, for example, with a rate that could be in total at 54 percent tariffs per

on those imports. How immediate of an impact do you expect that to have? And what's it actually going to do to the level of imports the United States is bringing in?

Well, it's certainly a very, very large impact, and not only on China, but so many other countries. Vietnam's rate is very high, Cambodia, the EU. I think where it is, you know, as was mentioned earlier on your show, our early calculations show we're going to get close to 30% weighted tariff average. That's

You know, that's something we've never seen in this country. And they put the minimum, the universal, in place to try to prevent countries from diverting to other places, these goods. So I think everybody's scrambling now. Do you think this is more than a lot what the market's expected? And people are going to try to figure out how to adjust.

Well, I'm trying to figure out what's next here, Sarah. It is great to have you with us as we try to figure out exactly what the president is intending to happen next. Is it more likely that reciprocal tariffs will take effect on April 9th or that we'll have a series of new trade deals with individual countries between now and then?

Well, that's a very, very short amount of time to do a trade deal. And I think perhaps you could see a couple of countries that would be able to pull something in. But what the president was talking about today is very complicated stuff. What types of not just tariffs, uh,

But non-tariff barriers, farming, agriculture exports, how things are docked and ported. Vietnam and Cambodia, they talked extensively about how China is using those countries to bank shop their products. Those aren't things that you can resolve effectively.

very quickly. So I think that we may get a couple of announcements and certainly countries are ready to go and eager to bring their offerings in. But I think the bulk of this, the EU, China, all of these, these are going to take a lot of time to negotiate. I think folks should be prepared to be patient.

Well, and as the president said in his remarks in the Rose Garden, that the way to get an exemption or if you're seeking one, you should terminate your tariffs, calling on countries to drop their tariffs or those other non-tariff barriers. How much easier is that said than done, Sarah, especially for some of these emerging economies that you're referring to that are more heavily reliant on these levies as an actual source of revenue? Their economic structure is just different than ours.

some countries have very, very high tariff barriers, like India. That, in some ways, is complicated to drop back when we're in a WTO world, which I guess we sort of still are. Normally, you would offer that to other countries as well. I honestly think

I honestly think the non-tariff barriers can be more complicated to address. Some of the ones that they're talking about with the EU, overregulation, digital taxes, that stuff that requires legislatures to get involved. The EU, for example, has a lot of different countries with different stakes in various products. So I think it almost is the non-tariff barriers that are more challenging to work through.

You know, of course, the Biden administration kept Trump tariffs in place and even raised some of them, Sarah. With that in mind, I don't know if you think that was the right move or not, but could some of these be permanent? Well, the Biden administration did keep a lot of the Trump tariffs and add to them in China. And that was very, I think the biggest difference in this administration that we're seeing is this is global. This is a lot of allies, the EU, China.

Canada, Mexico, very integrated supply chains. So a very different approach. The way President Trump thinks about it is very different. He wants to know what's in it for us in the United States, even with close allies, which is not really how Mr. Biden would have thought about it. So I think it's very, very different. Certainly,

Certainly, tariffs are easier to put on than they are to take off. And so, for sure, I do think we will see some remnants of this system. A part of that is going to depend on how the economy performs and how much of a stomach President Trump has to, you know, kind of ride that through.

You know, look, if we're at close to 30 percent from 3 percent where we were on the weighted tariff average, we're not going back to three. We might do something, you know, I don't know if it's eight or 10 or what it is, but we're not going back to where we were.

Well, Sarah, I want to go back to something that Mike McKee was referencing, which was the de minimis exemption. I would note, in addition to the executive order that implements these reciprocal tariffs, the president also signed an executive order today eliminating that de minimis exemption. That will be effective on May 2nd. Obviously, this applicable to low value parcels. How consequential is that decision in and of itself?

Well, they've been on a little bit back and forth on this. It's interesting. I wouldn't I would have thought you would need a congressional legislative fix for that. But but but but they're a bit more. We'll see. You know, we'll see how it sticks, you know, because there does seem to be a lot of back and forth in this space.

Certainly certain sectors, it's a really big issue for some of our companies with like low priced clothing that a lot of it comes in under de minimis. So certain sectors very, very impacted if we do see this go into effect. But this one is wobbled around a little bit. So I'm not ready to say like this is for sure a done deal.

Doug Ford, the Ontario premier, is with us now on Bloomberg TV and radio. It's great to have you with us, Mr. Ford. You've called this Termination Day instead of Liberation Day. What will be the response now from Canada?

Well, let's see where these tariffs go. I'm cautiously optimistic that I never saw Canada or Mexico on that list. And it just goes to show you two great countries working together, collaborating together and building relationships. So, again, I'm cautiously optimistic. I think if that's the case, it's the right thing for both the U.S. and Canada.

Well, and considering Canada was not on that list, we understand the existing regime is in place of the tariffs that are in place with the exemption of goods that are USMCA compliant. Does that mean, sir, at least in your mind, that it wouldn't be appropriate for Canada to retaliate for this at this time? That is correct. If that's the case...

then I would highly recommend to the Prime Minister not to retaliate and let's carry on a strong relationship. Let's build the AMCAN fortress, American-Canadian fortress, around both countries and be the wealthiest, most prosperous, safest two countries in the world. You've suggested that Canada would bring down its tariffs.

if the United States did the same. Does this turn into a game of chicken? Do you believe that the White House would respond accordingly?

Well, I hope so. You know, it's we're neighbors for the last 200 years. And when we show good faith or the U.S. shows good faith, you have to follow. This is a partnership that's going to go on for hopefully several hundred more years and decades to come. And we have bigger concerns, both Canada and the U.S., than each other. We have to keep an eye on other countries like China. Who makes the first move in a game like that?

Well, we'll work collaboratively with the administration and with our prime minister. And he'll be speaking to President Trump, I'm sure, over the next day or so. And we'll be working with Secretary Lutnick to get a clear picture of what this means for Canada.

What about what it means for the auto sector in particular? Because, of course, we learned last week that the president would announce what he made final today, which is that 25 percent tariffs on auto imports will be going into place. Obviously, parts are going to be included in that eventually, sir. So what impact do you expect that alone will have, even if tariffs on or reciprocal tariffs were not applied to Canada today?

Well, I just hope there's no tariffs on auto because parts go back and forth across the border seven, eight times before they get assembled either in Ontario or one of the states, be it Michigan or other U.S. states. It's a system that works and has worked since 1965. I've always said you can't unscramble an egg that's been around since 1965. You have to make the omelet larger. And we're just so much stronger together. We buy as many vehicles as we sell down there.

And the ones that we ship to the U.S., 50 percent of that automobile is U.S. parts. So I think the system is working. It's working well for both countries. And it's a great system, especially Canada is buying 400 percent more vehicles off the U.S. than Mexico does, 200 percent more than any other country in the world. We have an incredible relationship with the two great countries.

They're so integrated on many different sectors. But even the people are integrated. You know, millions and millions of Canadians and Americans travel back and forth across the border. They have family members on both sides of the border. And we just appreciate. And Canadians love Americans. I love Americans. I love the U.S. I spent 20 years of my life there. And I have a tremendous amount of respect and friendships with our American counterparts.

Well, it's interesting to hear you say that, Premier Ford. You've been really careful from the commentary that I've heard to direct your remarks at the Trump administration, at the president himself, as opposed to the American people, suggesting that you're looking to reset our trade relationship here on a more positive level, maybe in a post-tariff world. But we've also heard from the prime minister that our trade relationship, as we know it, is over, which is true.

Well, I believe in never getting personal with anyone, no matter if it's President Trump or Secretary Lutnick. We'll talk about the issues.

We may go back and forth. It's no different than family members around the table. You may disagree, but at the end of the day, you come out united and stronger than ever before. Because again, there's a lot of people that don't see eye to eye with the U.S. and Canada, and especially how close we are. We'll need each other for many years to come.

Well, and when we consider the various figures in the Canadian government, you yourself included, obviously there are many people in the Trump administration who have had a hand in shaping these policies. I know you've been in contact with the Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, in particular. Do you believe he had a role in making sure Canada was not included on that list today? Well, I'm really hoping. You know, I have a really very good relationship with Secretary Lutnick.

I have a tremendous amount of respect for him. He's an extremely bright business person, a very shrewd negotiator. That's his job, and I understand that. And our job is to make sure we protect Ontario jobs and Canadian jobs as well. But again, we're so integrated, everything from travel to commerce and everything in between.

When we consider the way forward here, Premier Ford, is it going to be on a national level here or will it be by the provinces? Is this something that you've discussed with the prime minister? It will always be on a national level. The prime minister will lead these negotiations and hopefully we can sit down and either get a USCA deal or renew the USMCA deal. And that would be up to President Trump and better

But our prime minister, I'm the chair of the premiers. It changes every year. And we have a great group of premiers. And the prime minister listens to what we have to say. But if your voice will be included in this conversation, what would an appropriate renegotiation of the USMCA agreement actually look like? What changes would Canada be willing to accept?

Well, I thought the USMCA deal that President Trump put together and said there was the greatest deal ever, I'd love to see that stay the way it is. I want to increase trade and be it the critical minerals that China has cut the US off, be it the high-grade nickel or other critical minerals that the US can't get.

There's no one else in the world I'd want to give them to more than our closest friends and allies. That's the way we should operate, in my opinion. We share the same values. There's no two greater countries, an unprotected border, the longest in the world. That's the way it's been for years, and it's worked. And I'd love to see it continue to work.

Well, so how, I guess, in the end, do you feel, Mr. Ford, about what we heard today from the White House? You could frame this as could have been worse. You could also feel betrayed by some of the comments that President Trump delivered.

How would you describe him? Well, I never, yeah, I never take anything personal, be it from President Trump or anyone else. I understand he's a businessman and that's the way he conducts his business. And fair enough, he has a job to do, we have a job to do. And I think any negotiation, we meet in the middle and make sure that we grow two great countries.

and make them the strongest in the world that no one can touch us. We'll ship down all the critical minerals, we'll ship down all the oil that you need and electricity, anything that you need. We have more natural resources than anyone in the entire world. And again, there's no one I'd want to ship it down to more than our great friends and allies.

Well, finally, as you raise natural resources, we do understand based on an official that briefed reporters that coming later, expected shortly, in fact, or possible soon could be action specifically on lumber as well as as well as critical minerals, which you just mentioned with Section 232 tariffs possible soon. What response would you have prepared if indeed those go into place?

Well, I think we've had this lumber war been going on, it seems, for decades. But majority of the homes built in the U.S. are from Canadian lumber. It would jack up the cost of homes immediately. That's the same as the auto sector. It increased the cost of the American people to buy an automobile. Pharmaceuticals, same thing. Seniors that are relying on low-cost pharmaceuticals, that would go up as well.

These are areas that I believe would be beneficial for both countries to move forward and work together and be very cautious when we look at any tariffs on any of those three sectors. All right, Doug Ford, the Premier of Ontario, thank you so much for joining us with reaction to this announcement we just got from President Trump in the White House Rose Garden.

Every business starts with an idea. How can you go from daydreamer to industry leader? Amazon Business accelerates your journey. With smart business buying, get everything you need to grow in one familiar place, from office supplies to IT essentials and maintenance tools. Amazon Business takes the buying experience you know and love from Amazon, plus tools that help you save costs and make insights-based decisions. Ready to bring your visions to life? Learn how at AmazonBusiness.com.

Yeah.

There are presentations.

And then there are Canva presentations. With Canva, you can use AI to take your presentation to the next level. You can generate dynamic slides and text with a simple prompt. You can drag and drop graphics and charts from Canva's media library and add interactive elements to plus up your deck. And with collaboration tools built in, the whole team can work together better. You'll love the presentations you can easily design with Canva. Your clients and coworkers will too. Love your work with Canva presentations at canva.com.