A New Periodic Table? Dr Weiping Yu Uses Uon Theory to Rethink Chemistry, His New Book
57:36 Share

How would you redesign the periodic table without electron shells? That's huge.

We're back for another program. I'm here with our chief science advisor for A Neighbor's Choice and our physicist, Dr. Yu. How you doing, sir?

Thank you for having me on. I'm doing great. Thank you. Yeah, great to see you again. I wanted to talk about some of the implications of your theory into a downstream field that I do a lot of programs about with other folks, and we did one recently with

a gentleman from Sewing Prosperity. That was a great discussion with him. But, you know, it's the implications of your theory applied to biology and chemistry that I think people are going to be fascinated by because there are implications about, you know, the origins of life, how evolution works within species and adaptations, how chemistry works, the way in which transmutation may be possible, etc.

the way in which the phenomena of consciousness can be understood. But first, let's establish the foundations of Yuan theory, your theory of everything. So Yuan theory is a physical theory. Try to explain all the natural phenomena based on one particle, one force, one field, one principle.

and in one universe. We do not need a high dimensional or multiverse to explain everything happens now. Right.

Well, very good. So if we're going to start with that foundation, then what do you think is the main mistake behind the modern model of the electron? Because that is considered to be settled science. When we talked to Brian Green, the physicist on our program years ago on radio, he did not want to hear you say that the electron...

was up for debate. He said, ladies and gentlemen, I have to stop the show right now and tell you that this is not something to be questioned. Everybody knows the electron is real and do not listen to Dr. Hugh on this matter, but we, but still you persist in saying the electron is not correct. So why is it? What, what is the main reason that we should not consider the electron to be, uh, you know, uh, truth? Uh,

Okay, that took years before I finally realized what's truly wrong with physics because we know even Brian Greene himself does not even believe relativity and quantum mechanics in his bottom of heart. So that's why he considered as a one founder of string theory, even well there. Okay, so you know, whoever come up the new theory, they totally dismiss everything we taught.

you know, things, you know, problem. Okay. He's very smart. I have highly respect to him. But I know if he admit electron is something does not even exist in this universe.

I believe that can impact his life, livelihood, you know, he earned a living by teaching string theory, quantum mechanics, you know, right? So I fully understand. And he truly believed he was teaching. And I fully understand because before him, you know, since what is it, since the 19th century, you know, all the problems, nobody else has been solved until I was

push it to the corner to try to develop something. And I find the so-called negative charged particle. A particle, physical particle can only carry one type of charge.

I thought that this idea is a contradiction to every particle also have a magnetic moment. So that's how I find out. Eventually I find out, oh, so the so-called negative charge contradicting with why you negative charge, you have a positive and then both positive and negative magnetic moment, right? Magnetic poles. And turns out, so electron does not exist as a negative charge particle. It's just a little magnet.

So it should be called electron then, right? It should be called something else, maybe? Exactly. You know, I try to, in my book I'm writing, I try to change the term electron to eons. You know, the huge difference is whenever you talk about electron, people would automatically think about electron is some particles traveling in the...

orbiting the nucleus and traveling in electrical wire as electricity right what i find nothing orbiting no particle ever orbiting in inside of a nucleus inside the atom orbiting anything there's no moving parts and the second thing for electricity there is no free electron traveling

So that's why I said... But haven't they... Won't they say, Brian Green and these folks say that the electron has been well-established, it's been demonstrated, it's been seen, it's been observed in scientific studies, it's been demonstrated in the lab, it's been demonstrated through precise mathematical calculation and prediction. The case is pretty closed here, right? That there is this negative charge particle. So how could you just say...

Because you've made a logical argument therefore that invalidates the empirical evidence that has allegedly been You know behind this electron existing very good questions. I did also a lot of research number one No one ever in this universe. I find out Observe the world charges observe what what is what is a char what a charge it looks like? What is a charge no one ever observe anything?

what they all observe the phenomena. And actually this idea can be easily tested. They use a plasma ball. You just take a look at the plasma ball, generate a lot of lights, right? So that means lots of electrons should be like charge repel, should be an entire film spread all over. If you put your hands on top, I believe David, you interviewed me 80 years ago, right? I put the hands on top of plasma ball.

All the filaments come together, lined up, one by one. What that means? They are now like charge of hell. They have both positive and negative charge, just like an electron, like a yuan. So the yuan is rotating into the other pole, right, to be attracted to it, right? Opposite pole. Oh, yuan is just a little magnet.

However, you know why? Magnets has both positive and negative poles, right? We call them north and south pole. So north actually represents the positive charge or positive, we can, one-to-one correspondence, okay? Yeah.

Does matter behave distinctly or in different ways depending on if it has a net north charge or a net south charge? Oh, you are talking about a mono-charged, it's called a magnetic monopole. So far, there's countless people.

Chainsaw surgery for magnetic monopoles? No, what I'm talking about here is what you, in keeping with your theory, that you don't believe magnetic monopoles exist, but I'm saying that the magnetic dipolar particles or bipolar particles, these positive and negative particles, they can align themselves in different structures, molecularly, to create a negative...

to create a net charge, right? They can be a line to have one extra sticking out that makes it a little bit attractive, right? That's right. It has a local negative, a local positive. Yeah. Do materials change their nature based on whether they have a net north or a net south?

Charge? That's what I'm asking. You put little magnets together and then have a net north or a net south. Does that change any of their behavior or no? No. Just charge. Number, you do not change the material structure, let me tell you.

but you do change the orientation okay each individual particle in your material yeah it's a magnet right so so they normally aligned naturally things cancel each other you know so do not have internal stress you know when you uh however if you put every all the materials all include all the materials we have been observed they put in the high magnetic field

I believe there's one company generated the world's strongest magnetic field in Tampa, Florida. At one time, there was a group of people who tried to invite me to go there, but I could not go. I really wanted to visit their laboratory.

What they have, they have a strong magnetic field, and if you put all the material inside the magnetic field, you will notice all the material behavior, dipolar magnetic effect, you know, kind of floating in the air or in the environment. Yeah. So how do atoms bond if there are no electrons orbiting? That's a really good question. That's the theory.

every single part of chemistry based on that rules. We call it "sheared electron" or "exchanging electron". So that's a different type of ionic bond or this is a covalent bond, a sheared electron. That actually is a mystery to chemistry too. How could, based on the physics, how could the electron orbit constantly

they can share in certain angle and be a stable structure. So this is, they have never been solved. And what I find out, oh, there is, there's totally no so-called free orbiting electron. So it does not have the problem to share electron. So that's the fallacy. That's the mystery. And I think Yuan theory can solve it. So how does it solve it?

Oh, you want to say we do not have this called the orbiting electron, which is negative charge. If we share, how do we share negative charge to negative charge against each other, right? So you want to say no, every single particle is a magnetic particle. You just put a bunch of magnets together, they will stick together. Let me show you. So this can be easily to prove. You just put the magnets together, they will form all the shapes.

Only difference by different geometry. Just like I say, hey, I have a four, a five. So I have a different geometry or this way or that way. And also different number of this proton or neutron. We just say different number of protons. So they're all magnets. So that's why magnetic connection is because of alignment of magnetic force.

So how does the magnetic polarity replace the electron sharing in this bonding? How does it stick together? Oh, because every particle has a magnetic force. Magnetic force has a north and a south. So of course, so if you have a charge, if you have another magnetic ball coming in, I'm going to say, hey, if I have two balls, how are they coming?

they will align themselves. They can find based on the like pole repel opposite pole attract. They will find itself called a self-balanced position. Just for the sake of the audience, they might be saying, okay, this guy's saying everything's a magnet. Okay. So everything's made out of magnets. Can you hold up those two books? Okay. Now, how come they don't stick together? Oh, that's a very good question. Yes.

That's where come out the majority in our life. We do not see magnets, right? Magnets has to special because when you everything has a magnetic, it will interact.

Yeah. Is there any way you can get them to stick together if you change their polarity or anything? Let's see. Can you try? No. Let's see it for the video audience. There is no way I do not have the power to change this one. Gravity cannot do it. Only thing we can do is stick in the high strength, high power magnetic field. Right. They will magnetize them. I

At that time, they can still use it. But, you know, basically the question is, why two books do not stick together? So now you ask this question. Can you show the magnets again? Oh, magnets. You're talking about these magnets? Yeah. Okay, sure. Those are all magnetized? Yeah. Yeah, these are natural magnets. Okay, even though these are magnetized. But this one...

This is a stainless steel ball. Up a little bit. Yeah, okay. Yeah, okay. This is a stainless steel ball. Yeah. That's not a magnet. However, if I connect, it will be magnetized. So if you take a magnet ball and a steel ball just by themselves for a second. Can I see it better, sir? Sure. We see them for the camera.

So break them apart. So what is going on at the chemistry level of that steel ball versus the magnetic ball? Why is one kind of state of stability? If we had two steel balls, they wouldn't do that. What's going on at the chemical level there? Because naturally, two magnetic particles would be canceling each other.

because it forms a neutral particle. That's what the steel ball is. The natural position, you know, you have two magnets, right? The natural position is cancel each other. That's the stable condition. So that's why... Why is that the natural position? Oh, because if it's not cancel each other, you will have a stronger magnetic field.

What happens to stronger magnetic field? We interact with other people too. We attract something, it all will never stop until one day it was called buckled. Once long magnets buckled, become neutral particle because positive and negative neutralized. That's exactly what happens to most of the objects on earth. They are not magnets. However, you said how this magnet is made?

special made under high strong magnetic field polarizer what is going on at the chemical level that makes it polarized there's no change to chemical composition whatsoever it's only changing every particles you know chemical level that means we are talking about molecules right yeah every molecule is a

bipolar magnet, only changing their orientation. Remember? Rotation. It does not change position. There's not missing electron, or does not transmute any parts of it. Yeah. So what is happening as they approach? What is going to happen right now as they approach closer and closer and closer? What's happening at the E1 level?

Subatomic level. What's happening? I hope you can see, right? Yeah. This is a steel ball. And once they come down, there's one thing about the magnetic force. It can send things, objects, over distance. Okay. That's the signature. Through...

Actually through a medium, magnetic field. Now I call it U-on field, U-on magnetic field, which is different than people talking about the ether. Yeah, ether is hypothetical or something, and it's not like a real substance. So in this case, just U-on fluid, liquid. Does that, well, that magnet loses magnetism over time, right? Oh, that's right. Yeah, because of the... What is going on there that makes that? Is that a chemical thing?

No. Just say if you're a magnet, you constantly interact with other things, right? When you interact, what happens? You would be very easily to change orientations. So then you suddenly folded. Okay, then you lost strength. So that's why all the permanent magnets, so-called permanent, still have a lifespan.

Now, what is it about the steel balls, the UON arrangement that allows it to attract to the magnet, but it can't attract? Look, if you touch it to the book, it won't attract, will it? Can we see it? Oh, of course. Of course. If you're two non-magnetized people, so basically two neutral particles does not attract to each other. Right.

Yeah, you have to have a magnet. Which magnet? When magnets go, what happens? Magnets have a strong magnetic moment, right? Changing the orientation of the particles inside of this non-magnetic ion ball, they call the magnetized. So they're changing their orientation. You know, every atom's

between atom has a space in between, right? They allow them to rotate, right? Yeah. So under external magnetic force impact, so the particle can change orientation and be aligned. So then, check. Yeah. I hope I made, does that make sense to you? Yeah. Okay, good. Hopefully to your audience too. Yeah.

How would you redesign-- I have some questions I put down here first. How would you redesign the periodic table without electron shells? That's huge. OK. I don't know I can show you the pictures. First of all, explain what are electron shells in the current model. Oh, the current model is based on the quantum mechanics. Say, hey, every atom has an electron orbiting the nucleus, right?

Because this electron has to generate a special called the light spectrum. So we see light if you see hydrodynamic oscillation and external excitation, it will display different light spectrum, have a special line.

discrete line. So in order to explain how this different line, discrete line, displayed by one atom, so it comes out, hey, electron cannot be only orbiting in one location. It has to be jumping or at several different discrete orbits.

So that's what they call the electron shell is trying to describe a shell that's a different orbit located, you know, used to cut a different energy level. So develop them. I have a picture. I don't think normal people would understand what that means. And also within each shell, electron location, we don't know, you know, based on quantum mechanics, right?

We only try to predict the probability of, not the electron, has to be electron cloud where the most appear location. It will never show you the trajectory, never tell you the position of electron. It's a complete field theory in terms of explanation of chemistry.

Right. Are you going to redraw the elemental? Are you going to give us your periodic table? We're going to have a new periodic table called a structured periodic table. Instead of this is called chemical chemistry, called electron-based periodic table. Wow, you heard it here, folks. Breaking news. We're going to have a new periodic table. Yes. Yes.

How about, is your periodic table going to be similar to Walter Russell's periodic table? I do not know what Russell's work. I do not know. But I don't want to know anybody until I finish my thing. You don't want to be contaminated. Yeah. If you want to have a creative work. Your mind is like in the jury isolation. When your jury decides on a

decision. They try to isolate the jury from reading news or blog posts so to not be influenced by popular opinion or expert opinion to sway them one way or another. Oh, wow. Of course, you can't do that perfectly, right? You know, you've been exposed to ideas already, but you know. But that doesn't help. Why are some reactions energetically favorable in your view? People asking...

Why you want, you know, everything in motion, right? How can you form particles, form big objects, right? Everything we're talking about. So then it requires slowing down the energy, slowing down flow, traveling energy, and then becomes almost quite static, quasi-static. So then the gravitation, I'm sorry, the magnetic force start kicking in, can't hold it together.

How does your model explain ionization? Oh, so-called ionization is turn neutral particle, okay, to a charged particle. So how do you do it? If you have any neutral particles, you just rub it, rub it. Then you find that they start to carry charge, right? Just expose, just call the, what is it? Call the unfolding, unfolding the, the, the, the, the, the, called a neutralized particle, unfolding them.

become then locally charged, means locally magnetopole exposed. So does it result in a charge state due to the field asymmetry rather than an electron loss? Oh, it's not a loss. There's no particle loss whatsoever. Right. That's what I'm saying. Is it yuan field asymmetry that makes it ionized? Not exactly called asymmetry, but just exposed locally

one pole, the other pole attract the object, right? One pole explodes. So then you feel like, oh, this is a positive charge, right? So you feel like attracting that one. But it's only localized phenomena. Globally, every object, if you have a global north, you should have a global south simultaneously. Yeah.

What is an isotope in the Yuan model of chemistry? The so-called isotope means if you already have a charged neutral particle, saturated means you no longer need any additional particles to keep stable. All the elements listed in the periodic table are particular geometry and in a stabilized form.

So, so-called isotopies, we do not change the basic structure. However, on top we have extra neutrons. So you have additional particles there. You know what happens? Number one, even though globally the original base structure is neutralized, is neutral, however at a local point, it is made by the magnetic particles in each point, right?

So in the local point, you could still have particles attached on the surface called extra particles attached on surface, but these particles are not stable. So whenever in motion, like nuclear reaction, this kind of isotopes easily to separate.

Yeah, so that's why. And this isotope. So they're charged. These are charged particles, right? Oh, no. Normally, it will say the isotopes are neutral, extra neutrals.

But you could have extra, you know, neutron and the electron and the proton. Only different by slightly, right? But you don't believe in protons and neutrons. They don't exist, right? Right. They do not. So what is in the Yuan model of chemistry? What's going on with the isotope? What is it? It's not made up of neutrons, right? What is it made up of?

Oh, just another additional particles attached on, additional magnetic particles attached on there. Are they attached in a certain way that makes them structurally different than ions? Oh, yeah, sure. Ion means you have actual global magnetic pole, global nose and sauce. That's ion. But if you attach additional called the neutron particles, the neutral particles, right?

then you may not be changing global magnetic north. You do have neutral particles in Uon chemistry, but it's just an amalgamation of

of bipolar particles in a neutral structure like you mentioned earlier. Yes, yes, you are right. So-called neutral particle is basically all made by magnet. So in terms of chemistry, I want to say we need to discard the chemistry called electron-based chemistry entirely. There's no any place to keep any part of it. So then replace by what?

there is no shared electron, there is no electron called the ionic bond, so electron being pulled by the other part of the exchange particles. None of them correct. So now if you replace with the Ewan theory, everything is a magnetic particle. Magnetic particles naturally connected to each other. So that's why you can make a structured periodic table just based on how many magnetic particles

If you have one, it becomes hydrogen. If you have two, it becomes helium's nucleus. If you have three, it could be a triangle shape. It's all based on geometric shape. You can buy the combination, different combination, you can assemble the Pyrological Table.

Infinitely. Wow. So infinite elements await. Infinite elements, yeah. If you try to believe, because different structures give you different... What would those infinite elements look like and what could they be of value to humans? Oh, you know, normally we have a stable structure, like a triangle, a tetrahedral shape. Yeah. You know, right? We like different kind of shapes, right? Some shapes are very stable. You want it.

But some ships, just like if you wanted like uranium, you want to come radioactive materials. So that materials you have to have what is a very unstable. So that's why I call it radioactive material. It can spontaneously discharge, right? Can throw particles away. And that one could be energetic, you know, to create a, what is that?

I don't think a weapon, but you can add it as a medical use, right? Radioactive materials can help you. All those infinite unstable, all those infinite elements are all going to be unstable pretty much, you know, in terms of what we're talking about. That's right. Only the base, basic shape is stable. If you have anything more than that basic shape, you will be unstable. How do catalysts work if reactions aren't electron-based?

Oh, electron iron. Oh, catalysts, just say, you know, you want so-called catalysts, you want to break some bond, bondings. For example, so the so-called catalysts, catalysts try to facilitate a chemical reaction. Facilitates just say, break this one and then become charged and then they form a new substance, right? So you want to have them break. But you do not have enough energy.

So what happens is you put a catalyst. Catalyst is a different type of magnetic particles. So when you have a catalyst, so basically just like sometimes you put water in it. Water could serve as a catalyst, right? Can weaken their bonding and make them break. And then once you make them break, they become charged particles. What happens? They are not going to attract the water particles.

So what happens? It will find another charged particle from a different, you remember, different size, different number of particles. You form different elements. You have different molecules, different substances. So catalyst is just like water here. Can weaken their bonding and then when separated, they connect with other, form the other bond and the water come back together. Water does not even lose any weight, right?

Something just like that. Help you to facilitate reaction, so the separation and the rebinding. Does that make sense to you? I know this is not a simple concept because in chemistry, you would not get this kind of explanation in terms of it's not like electrons show how electrons show how we're influenced by something else. It's totally different. Let's ask. I want to ask this question in the chemistry section of my questions today.

What chemical anomalies does Yuan theory explain better than current chemistry rooted on the standard model as it is? One thing is the standard model does not explain any chemical phenomena with any mechanism. It's all based on the hypothetical or metaphor. There's no mechanism to it.

So that's why quantum mechanics does not even help chemistry. You only hurt the chemistry by impeding chemistry and biology development. So that's detrimental. You might see, yeah, you mentioned about it the other day on the video. I was feeling like anger talking about how, you know, chemistry and biology principles

They're totally based on the nonsense. So that's why nobody even wanted to share their knowledge because I said they knew that knowledge does not make sense to every chemist, to even to biology professors. How can they share something that does not even make sense to them?

I want to apologize for the language I was using last time. I probably talked too general. That's how my thinking is. I always like to generalize. So I may criticize. Sounds like I'm criticizing chemists and biology. Actually not. I have a high respect for them. The problem is the physicists. Supply is the wrong model.

Entire misled the entire scientific field. So I feel angry. It's not because of the hard working, you know, biologists and chemists. They are my allies. They are my friends. And we're supporting each other. Yeah. Well, now that you brought up biology, let's get into some of the basic questions about biology that you on theory can help us understand. And I first wanted to start by asking some questions that would be of interest to our

You know, folks who are fans of the late biologist Dr. Ray Peet, who frequented my program. The first question has to do with energy transfer in cells. Doctor, you define, with your UON theory, you redefine electromagnetic interactions at a fundamental level.

and biology energy transfer within cells, such as ATP's role or mitochondrial function, relies on precise molecular interactions. Exactly. How might the yuan particles' properties reshape our understanding of how energy is generated and utilized in cellular processes, particularly in the context of oxidative phosphorylation? Okay. So basically,

at cell level, you know, protein level, you know, all the proteins is actually the robots. But you think of a robot has to have a power. Who's powering those robots, right? That's exactly, that's called a magnetic, electromagnetic motor. That's what every single particle is a magnetic particle and they fall mean,

And as long as you have oscillation on magnetic particles, you generate electricity, right? So that's where the power is. So at a macroscopic, so we are human, complex human beings. At a macroscopic, you can single function, just like it becomes oscillation like an electrical motor.

So that's why all the motions, all the powers is due to the oscillation of magnetic field. And where comes this oscillation? Sunlight or chemical reaction. Sunlight is an electromagnetic wave, right? Creates an external disturbance. So that's why it creates energy. And that energy...

resonant with your fundamental particles, you know, create a resonant. And so you can forming those kind of robots, you know, create a wind, just like a pump. Can pump something out but not allow the in, and to transport from one place to another place and carry things with you. How they carry? Of course, use a magnetic force, right? They do not use hands to grab them, right?

You've discussed how Yuan theory accounts for electromagnetic phenomena differently than classical physics. Gilbert Ling's work suggests cells lack a traditional lipid bilayer and operate as a magnetic gel-like matrix. Oh, that's good. Could the Yuan's interactions with cellular components like water or proteins...

provide a physical basis for Ling's model, particularly in how cells maintain their energetic coherence. Fundamental principles. If he met, this is called a magnetic field. Yeah, he said he does not believe that there's a...

a traditional cellular membrane, like in traditional that, that basically cells are like little, little bags with, with water inside. He thinks that they're actually magnetic gel. Wow. They're, they're magnetically polarized, like a little gel.

I pay respect to him. Yeah. So whoever can see, this is a deep. He was the one that, he's the one that went on to help create the MRI, MRI technology. Oh, okay. I didn't know. So that's why, you know, you know, Ashton and Forbes, my friend, he's got, he has a question on me for me this Friday. So, you know, about the MRI principles. Yeah. Okay.

Well, Gilbert Ling's principles are the one, he's the one that helped create that technology. Oh, okay. He believed, his theory argues that intracellular water is polarized and oriented and thus dynamically structured. That fits well with your model, right? Exactly. Everything can be polarized. So the reason it can be polarized is because everything made by dipole magnets. Yeah. I call the ions. Okay.

Let's talk about electromagnetic influence on hormones. Hormones? Hormones. Okay. I'm not a medical doctor, right? Yeah. So hormone to me, if anything has a strong impact to human behavior, right? Hormone levels, you know, it must be highly magnetized, highly strong, has a stronger magnetic field.

Water's role in biology. Gerald Pollack's work on exclusion zone water aligns with my views on the gel-like cyst cytosol. Your UON theory seems to offer a new lens on how light and electromagnetic fields interact with matter. Could UONs explain the structuring of water and cells, particularly how it contributes to the energetic properties of the cytosol or supports enzymatic function?

I can only talk about it in principle, right? In principle, the field, it has to be coherent from all the structure.

Yeah, so it's all you through this, the bio. In your discussions, you've mentioned resonance as a key phenomenon in Yuan theory, affecting everything from antibiotics to consciousness. How might resonance at the Yuan level influence biological processes like protein folding, enzyme kinetics, or even intercellular communication? And could this explain why certain frequencies, such as classical music, seem to benefit living systems?

Yes, you know, all the energy exchange, right, through vibration. And the vibration can influence, but vibration create the propagation. Vibration disturb locally, right? Propagation through the Yuan field. So that's where influence goes away. In order to have the biggest impact. So this influence has to be exactly create a resonance on the receiving end.

So that's why when they resonate with you, they receive the message. If they are not resonant with you, they just do not even aware your existence. So I do believe resonance is a very, very important phenomenon. And in order for people to be influenced, it has to have the same frequency, same channel basically, right? Similar biological or the magnetical structure.

Challenging biochemical dogma. I've long questioned mainstream views like the rigid cell membrane model or the oversimplified role of ATP. Your UON theory challenges foundational physics. In chemistry, how might UONs redefine our understanding of molecular bonds or reaction rates, particularly in metabolic pathways where energy efficiency is critical, like glycolysis or the Krebs cycle?

I just give you general principle answer, you know, because it's all interactions through magnetic force, right? So that's all the boundings through force. Of course, you can influence them through magnetic interactions.

from the environment or from external force or through vibration, create the internal oscillation and you know vibration can create resonance, can break particles apart. Consciousness and cellular energy. You've explored consciousness as potentially tied to yuan interactions in the universe. In my view, consciousness relates to the energetic state of cells.

particularly brain cells under thyroid influence, how could yuan-mediated electromagnetic fields contribute to the energetic coherence required for consciousness? And might this connect to metabolic rate at the cellular level? That's interesting. Yeah, every single, you know, consciousness itself is sensing through magnetic field, through magnetic force.

So that's the fundamental origin of consciousness. It is based on the... You can sense something yourself, and you can sense the environment, you can sense what we call the subjective experiences as identity or something, right? Remain that one. It's all through magnetic field, the magnetism. Elemental transmutation in biology. Your theory touches on the possibility of elemental transmutation, which is radical in physics.

Energy is not a problem. Energy could be from chemical reaction, from light, from lightning.

But the intrinsic structure has to be aligned with the magnetic structure's orientation in general. So we'll leave it there. Any last thoughts about chemistry and summarizing why yuan theory matters for informing us about the truth of chemistry and what chemistry can benefit from? Oh, it can unleash chemistry.

all the people working in the laboratories. Forget about those, what do you call that? Those abstract mathematical concepts, metaphysics or metaphors, that type of concept. Do experiment. Try to treat every single proton, neutron or molecules, atoms, molecules. Treat them just like magnets.

and see how their combination, how their geometry, how they are developed the special function and how to study their properties. I believe now you have a solid theoretical background to do so and I believe instantly people will find 10 or 10 times more new elements by doing real research.

changing the geometry, changing number of particles, and you will develop a lot of new materials and new drugs and serve for all different kind of purpose. I want to ask you, we have a couple questions

Questions from users, if you don't mind. Bob asks for you, can we convert his theories, your UON theory, can we convert his theories to math? Is he building anything with this knowledge? Thank you. Oh, yeah, that's a good question. Of course, I'm changing. First of all, I'm developing called the UON theory of instead of called gravity, you know, this is a generalized, you know, electromagnetic, you know,

equation called the, what is it? The generalized equation include the Coulomb's law and Newton's, the so-called gravity law, I combine them. And also I'm get rid of those singularities in Newton's gravity law and in Coulomb's law. You know, they have a distance r equals zero, right?

When the r equals zero, that becomes infinity. Mathematically, it's not defined. Physically, it does not exist. I'm getting rid of that formulation. And so it did change. And also, I'm dividing a general equation of motion, trying to cover everything, all the different types of motions in a similar equation. But another significant change is that

I'm going to rewrite the Coulomb's law. Oh, no, Ohm's law. Ohm's law never makes sense. Try to simulate the electricity flow like water in a pipe. And also, I'm going to correct the mistake made in James Clerk Maxwell's equation. I believe this is God, this is gospel in electrodynamics. But his equation does have error.

The reason I have an error is that he believes electrons are negative charge particles. So that's why he can come up with this error. But it's not going to have a significant impact. But conceptually, we have to correct those things. Newton's law has to be outdated, has to get rid of. Because of Newton's law,

And then created this called a missing mass. And Galileo, don't you have something to change? Did Galileo have a law? Oh, Galileo so far, Galileo's law, Newton's first law of motion. So that's the inertia, law of inertia. That's actually Galileo's law. That law has to be explained with condition. Wow.

Well, you're going to get Galileo in trouble again. He can't catch a break. Oh, he's a brave man. You know, besides, I thought, you know, Newton think he's standing on the shoulder of giants. The number one would be Galileo. Yeah, which I do believe that.

And you've got to go up against Democritus too, don't you? You've got to get rid of him. Oh, yes. He's the, what is it? I would kind of call it the father of the color. There's a rigid, indivisible atom. Yeah. Atomic. Yeah.

I have high respect to him, okay? You know, also to Galileo. Democritus is where we get the word for democracy, right? I think. Oh, Democritus? I don't know. He's named after it at least. I don't know. Yeah, at that time, what is it, 2,000 years ago? You know, you develop those science theories, that's considered genius. Not like me, you know, after 2,000 years, I'm still, right, I come out. So they are smarter.

Papa Squirrely, another commenter, says, how much does a soul weigh? I don't know if they're being funny, if they really want to know. Are you talking about the soul? The mental soul? S-O-U-L. Yeah, soul.

So, okay. Can you, I do not understand the question. Can you repeat that? I guess he wants to know if you can weigh it. Can you measure the weight of it? Oh, so the measure. I think the only thing I can think about is that there's some thought that when someone dies, that they weigh less, something else or something. Yeah. You know the reason they weigh less? Most people think about you made lots of water, right? Yeah, sure. Of course I believe it. But when's just the second that they die?

They said you can detect way less. That's not because you lost all the matter, mass. No, because you lost strong magnetic field. You know, when you're alive, your head, north head is positive, everything grounded on the earth is negative. You have a strong biological magnetic field. That's what gravity is, right? That's where the weight comes from. You have poles, right?

But once you lost that, suddenly you lost the spirit, suddenly just like people sick. When people sick, it's disoriented. You're strong, being distracted by the certain. You were weighted differently. That's my prediction. If you do not believe me, you can test it. A health person suddenly gets sick. Did you see if he's losing weight or increased weight? Of course, the moment to moment matters.

Curious about how you want, this is Ice Age Ruck on X. Curious about how you want interacts with Dr. Emoto's work with influencing water structure and more applied using water imprinting for human and crop health. Oh, you know, the one thing is we call the structured water, right? The water has a charge. You know, that's exactly demonstrated. The water molecules are magnetic particles.

And I also built the model to explain why the water molecules, you have two so-called two hydrogen

nuclear hydrogen, what is the call the protons right and forming with with oxygen as oxygen, you know, Adam forming when 190 or 100 when 105.9 degrees angle something Yeah, I did a structural to explain that one. So that exactly explain

Every subject, especially this fluid, this subject, you know, of course, they are structured. They're structured matter. So they can form certain patterns.

and certain patterns why easy to uh really reflect the music certain harmonic music create a certain vibration notes right so those vibration notes will create a certain pattern the particles are vibrating and then also create a certain pattern you know harmony and which is also benefit of to human health anything harmony uh with biological life you you benefit to human life so

So I do believe called a structured water and it's healthier. It can retain your water content in your body longer. So that's why keep you healthier, keep your thinking. You know, those water molecules in your body is conducting materials, right?

So then you can quickly thinking or a reductant, you know, you know, all the energy distributed into your entire body. So that's keep you healthy. So, so, so structure order do have a lot of health benefit. Yeah. One last question for today from listeners, Thomas Phillips.

Would it be possible for Dr. Yu to describe some starting points for people who might be interested in his ideas and how they could be applied to the generation of energy, but don't necessarily have a background or education in science? Maybe a book or video or video series? Short answer, the book is coming. And the video, we have a lot of outreach videos available on your website, aneighborschoice.com.

If you find this gentleman, he has all the past videos from 10 years ago. You'll find that one. And the one thing, that's what I do. Try to explain people the NASA after-hours to three, from three years old all the way to 90 years old. I guess he wants to know particularly in the application of energy production.

We've done a lot of episodes on that, but not in, not like a dedicated video series, which, you know, maybe something we could do down the road, right? Oh, yes. Actually, David, you know, already had several projects, worked on several years. And of course, I do believe that this is called the cold, low energy nuclear, you know, reaction. We can make that device work.

And without needing a chemical resource, finding chemical resources. And one of the things that Dr. Yu predicted before we even found its existence was a 24-7 energy panel. We now have that. So, you know, those are things that, you know, from first principles, that's the importance of getting the first principles correct.

So, you know, these things need to be put in a systematic format for people to learn from. So, again, you can follow Dr. U at RealDrU on X, right? And you can also...

As he mentioned, go to our website, aneighborschoice.com, click on Science and You, and you'll see our entire catalog of episodes and a documentary that we did introducing the Yuan theory, as well as episodes about various topics and various guests along the way who have joined us in this scientific journey of discovery. We are watching history unfold in real time, folks, because there's never been a show that has...

help to facilitate and birth a theory of everything in real time for several years, except for a neighbor's choice. So, you know, we have done some historic work here, folks, and there's a lot to come. What you see on the show is the tip of the iceberg of what's to come. So just be

Hang on tight, and we appreciate your comments. And whichever platform you're watching this on, drop us comments, more questions. We'll try to do a little bit more Q&A with Dr. Yu from you guys as well as the questions that I pepper them with on my own. But drop a comment or email us, hello, at a neighbor's choice.com. I'm David Gronowski. Godspeed. Bye.

Thank you.

I took the bull.