Deep Dive
Shownotes Transcript
Hello, everybody. It's Lynn Scott Hagerman, and I have an astounding guest with me this morning. You guys are going to be beyond excited to hear this information. This is Dr. Wei-Ping Yu, and he is a physicist.
physicist, very distinguished physicist. And I want him to and he's also a man of God. And I want him to share he's going to teach us things in language we can all understand, because that's what he does. But he is going to explain things. All of you love to know the truth.
And I know all my followers, all you family and friends, you want to know where have we been lied to and what is the truth as best as we know now. And how is God involved with whoever's story I'm bringing on? So, Dr. Yu, thank you so much for being on today. Thank you for having me on. It's my honor to be able to be on your show.
Well, I'm excited. So we had a lovely conversation before I hit record. So if you will tell people a bit about your background and then reshare that conversation we had before I hit record. It was it was wonderful. OK, my name is Weiping Yu. I have a Ph.D. in engineering physics.
from University of Wisconsin-Madison. Okay. So right now I'm working at NASA as a crew, the vehicle subsystem manager. And I'm the founder of the U-Own theory of everything. It's a physical theory, try to unify all the phenomenons under one particle.
One force, one field, one principle, and one universe. Amen. So I'm going to screen share just a second and let people see. We have a beautiful slideshow, but I want people to see. So this is the Yuan. Is that how you pronounce that? That's correct. Yuan, just like a muon electron, represents the fundamental particles.
Okay, yes. And then this is a summary to your background just so people can take screenshots and I mean this is this is amazing. And you're currently, as you said, with NASA. So,
So tell me, tell my audience the conversation that we had beforehand, because you were explaining to me why you were inspired and motivated to go down this path in the first place.
Yes. The number one thing is I watched Lin's video interview. I was inspired by the mission. She inspired to share her story experience to raise awareness and
and for humanity, you know, try something. I was inspired, you are lying. So I said, oh, okay, maybe I should share with your audience since you are psychologist, right? So I wanted to share my, where did I got this motivation to start sharing my experience with the world? You know, after I got my PhD and then I started to work at NASA,
At one point, I opened up my college notes, the university notes in physics and mathematics.
And I find out so many works. But once I got to, I spent over two decades, over 24 years, studying physics, science. And after I work at NASA, sometimes I feel like, you know, the universe seems like just this way, you know, the life just that way. And I lack of inspiration in my life.
So then I look at my college notes, I feel sad one day. I feel sad. I made such good college notes and I thought that one day I might be using it. But the whole shift of notes after I worked for NASA and especially after I was 50 years old, that's the point. I feel like
I probably would never, never look at my notes again. And nobody else even wanted to look at it. So what is the purpose of my life? Spent so, so many times, make such notes, try to one day to help the world, right? Achieve some goals. I said, what's my goal? And I felt it's very difficult. You know, when you started drawing in daily, trivial life, you know, work. And then I said, okay. So one of my dream,
One of the things I don't want to regret at the time, I said, hey, I don't want on my last breath or on the deathbed, I would regret I spent a whole lifetime to learn physics and without thoroughly understanding how the universe works. So then my goal started to be simple, try to gain understanding of the universe for myself.
Not just like during the school year for the grades, for rankings, or for finding good jobs. And I started truly thinking, say, what is the truth? What is something I still do not understand? So I started this kind of journey, adventure to discover what is the fundamental particles and how to
universe will be called evolve or evolved from there. I think it's fascinating. You were telling me when we were talking that you started at NASA and you realized that you didn't understand what you'd been taught in physics and neither did they. So tell me that part of your story.
Oh, you know, one thing is about we have a lot of theories, right? From the classical theory, that's Newtonian mechanics, right? Everything's in motion. You know, we have a force and how. That's part I'm very good at. And I truly believe I'm expert on that one. But I get lost is somehow now we cannot, based on all the relativities, quantum mechanics, we have so many theories. And we're still waiting for it.
New physics, if you go to a physical conference, because nobody truly understands. So why we still do not have adequate theory to explain anything? We still do not know what is called dark matter.
Dark energy, which dark matter is supposed to occupy. The only matter we're supposed to know is 4% of the real content of the universe. We have 23% of the documentary. We have no clue what they are. We only know supposed their effect. We're missing matter, right? And also we have 67% of what's called dark energy.
We still have so many and we still don't know how gravity works. So I said something's wrong. Something's wrong with physics, right? And with all these things, people still try to develop some string theory, supersymmetry, holographic simulation theory. So why that one? So that's something we found them to be wrong. So then I started to try to say, hey, where is the problem?
with current physics. I wanted to find out what was the problem. And I was fortunate that I said, okay, in order to solve the physical problems, the problems must be related to the smallest particle in the world, the universe. So I started to drill down. What is the smallest particle? What do we look like? And to make the universe work. And then, to my surprise,
I not only discovered a problem with physics, with all the foundations of physics. It's not just started from modern physics. It even started with classical electromagnetism. And then I started a new theory. That's a U-Own theory, which makes everything so simple, simpler. So you studied everything there was to study in physics. Yes. And to help us understand...
this world in this universe, what is the foundation? How is it created? How does it work? And after all those years and all those college notes, and then going to NASA where we all would think our best and brightest are at even there,
you said weren't making sense even to the other scientists to where they would leave the field of physics because it didn't make sense to them what they were being taught right yes I wanted to expand that point you mentioned that yeah we discussed this one I
I found one thing very, very interesting. My colleagues at NASA, okay, I'm not spoken with for NASA, okay? I just express my own opinion, okay? So many of my colleagues, of course, they listened to my talk on the new discoveries, something. So they approached me, they said, hey, my first year at the college is a physics major, right?
But eventually they turned out to most of electrical engineer and mechanical engineer, aerospace engineer or fluid, you know, structural, mechanical, something. So I said, why your turn? They said, after one year, we do not find it make any sense. It's hard to comprehend. And when they raise questions to professor, the professor cannot answer.
they always have a way to deflect, right? Make jokes and say, oh, that's the way it is. And you have to do this way, even though I may not be answering to you. So that's why I believe it.
99% of the general population feel the same way. So I try to make the universe actually much, much simpler after I drill down. So where is the problem? And find out in order to solve the problem, I said, we have to find the smallest particle.
to explain the entire universe. So that's why I started to drill. So what is the smallest particle? Where should I look at the smallest particle? That's Sarhojevi. I want you to lead me to ask the questions. So what made you know that to solve the problem of people really not understanding what they were, the professors don't understand what they're being taught,
Students don't understand what they're learning. Once the students get in the workforce, especially a place like NASA, I mean, where our best and brilliant likely are, what they're saying, what they were taught makes no sense. So how did you know to drill down? How did you know the solution was in drilling down to the smallest particle you could find? Excellent questions. If everybody knows that one,
You focus on that when actually you just need to ask five or six questions. Why, why, why? Drawdown. You will find the answer.
Too bad. Not everybody did that one. Since I studied so many years, I thought, you know, the universe cannot be such complex. So where is the problem? So I started to look at where to find the particle, the fundamental particle. I thought, everybody has a problem with light. Right now, the physics has a problem with light. We have three types of different theories.
One theory called light is a particle called photons. Basically, behavior just like a bullet traveling through space, right? Yes, I've heard that. You have a fixed matter, right, materials, and they're traveling across space. So that's particle theory, just like ring drops. Yes. And another theory called light is a wave.
So-called wave. One thing about the wave, wave concept actually is more deeper, more difficult to understand. So whenever talking about the wave, we were thinking about the wave like a water in the pond, right? If you drop a pebble,
So what happens? The pebble creates disturbance, right? The pebble is a particle, right? Or we call it a source of light, light source. It creates disturbance. But how does this light beam be seen by everybody in the universe? Can you imagine, say, in the solar system, we have a sun in the center, right? Right.
What the sun does is create thermonuclear explosions on the surface. So why can we see it? Does that mean the sun can generate the particles in every space, every part of the space to be seen by the whole universe, by everybody in the universe at the same time? Can the sun generate that many particles?
I said that's impossible. So what I did, I did an experiment to find the sun is impossible to generate enough particles to be seen by everybody else, everybody in the universe. So that created the need called the wave concept, which means you have water in the pond, fill up the entire pond.
And then if you drop a pebble in the pond, that creates an initial disturbance. That's what the light source did. And however, why everybody can see the light is because the pond, that's the medium. The pond creates ripples. Yes. Propagates throughout all three-dimensional space. So that's why we can see the ripples. The ripples, that's what we see. That's what we perceive as light. Okay. The ripples. Yes.
Let me emphasize, this is a very important concept. Once you know what light is, you know what happens? So we wanted to know if a light particle, just like sun initially initiated light, right? It's a particle. However, the smaller particle than the light source is what? It's the medium, the particle in the medium. The particles in the pond, right? Right.
That's where I said, hey, some particles smaller than the initial. So that's why I started to draw down. But to make sure this sense, I want to show you an example for your audience. I'm going to demonstrate why light has to be a particle. I'm sorry, has to be a wave, cannot be particle. Okay.
I hope you are right now. You are my first. You are my first student. See if that make any sense to you. Okay. It does make sense. Yes, I'm following you. Yeah. Once you feel, that's how discovery started. Once I understand what light is, then I started to know what the smaller particle is. And then the whole universe, all the mysteries of the universe started to revel in itself.
So, excuse me, I'm going to get my props. Yes. To demonstrate right on the screen. Oh, I love it. I hope that's okay with you. Oh, that's wonderful. So, this is exciting, everyone. What he's discovered is astounding. And we are learning...
The truth in every field and every walk of life. We have been lied to. We have not been told the truth. And I've been bringing all kinds of people to you who have discovered the truth. And now we're going into physics, our foundations. How exciting.
Yeah, got it. Battery? Nine-volt battery, just household battery for alarm clock or for fire alarm. Another, it's a light bulb. Okay. Yes. What happens if I doing this one? Let me see how. If I can see this one. Yeah. Can you see the lights? Yes, I can see the light. You can see the lights, right? Yeah. What if I turn around?
turn positive to negative. Are you going to see light again if I'm doing the same thing? I don't know. You can give a guess, right? I guess no. You guys know because originally it's positive and negative, right? That's right. Oh, wow. I hope you can see. Okay. Yeah.
That's where most people, I do this in my outreach at NASA. Every year we have a family day or something, bring students today. It surprised lots of people. We've been taught the light, if you have a flashlight, if you turn battery around, it's not going to work. But in terms of the principle, as long as electricity goes through the
It goes through the filament, right? Yes. It will create a motion and generate the light. Yes. It doesn't matter which way, positive to negative or negative to positive. Okay. Yeah, clearly. That's the fundamental things that surprise everybody. Yeah. Okay. This is another key point. Okay. The key point is when you see the light, I mean, an auditorium can hold like 500 people. Yeah.
Everyone, so I asked her, I asked her, people sit on the corner, different corner. I said, can you see the lights? Of course we can see. Why are you even ask? I said, imagine if light is a particle, how many particles, how many particles can generate from this little ball to be seen everybody in the auditorium at a different distance, a different angle, different location, different height, right? Right. How many people, how many light particles can generate it?
If you take the wall out, I would be just a little light bulb should be observed by the whole universe, even the fiends, right? How many particles does a little battery can generate particles in the whole universe? No matter where in the universe, you should be able to see it. Of course, you just need just a fiend, right? So I said, that means there's no way
Light can be particle, can be generated by this little battery and create particle occupy every single spot in space. That's right. Impossible. Yep. Does that make sense to you? Yes, it does. And then the alternative, what happens if the space, if the auditorium already filled with the medium, the particle, just like a water, air. In the old days, they may call it, just have a medium, just call it electromagnetic medium.
What if the space is already filled with this one? And then the light bulb just creates oscillation, just disturbance in the field. What happens? Creates ripples. So everybody in the universe
at least in the visible universe. You can see light. That means the light is a wave propagated to your eye. You do not see the original light source. But the light source created the disturbance called vibration. The vibration has a certain period. The length of each period, that's called wavelength. So the wavelength...
The ripple created the wavelength, interact with the medium, propagate. So that's what we see the light. So then, you know what happens? I thought, "Aha, so light source, whatever, you know, have a light source, is not the smallest. I'm looking for the smallest particle, right?" Right. And that's called a fundamental, ultimate, the constitute of matter. Right.
And is that called, what is it called? Adam in Greece terms. So Adam is an indivisible rigid solid sphere. We're all taught that. We're all taught. No.
If that's the one, then we're going to stuck with everything the current theory have. There's a slight difference. I hope that that one. So I think this demonstrated the need for light propagation needs for medium. Does that make sense to you? It does make sense.
I know a lot of ladies are more, somehow, I just feel, grasp a concept
especially when I talk figuratively, you know, talk about it. I find ladies grasp that were faster than men. Okay. There's no, because men's more logical. Analytical. That's right. Yes, they are. And that's good. Analytical. Is that because the left brain is more analytical? Have a right brain. And it turns out, is that it turns out more logical?
what is it, pictorial, you know. Yes, pictorial, yeah. More whatever the concept, right? So I wanted to demonstrate another thing for you. Yeah. Still about the light. You know why I focus on so much about the light? I want everybody thoroughly understand. Yes, thank you. If you understand the light has to be propagated through medium. Yes. So that's why I did, I use many measures to convince myself.
oh my goodness, there's some medium there. You know, under the current theory, especially the special relativity theory, that would require no medium. The particles traveling
Any particle traveling at a speed of light, it has completely empathy vacuum space, right? Yes, that's right. That's right. Otherwise, you cannot have the speed of light. You have a complete empathy on the resistance, right? Right. So that's why I want to show you
show you another demonstration. Once you deeply agree with, "Oh, light has to have a medium," then we can focus on what's the particles, smallest particles in the medium. Okay. Yeah, I love this. So we're finding, we're hearing truth, folks.
We're hearing truth. You heard Dr. Yu talk about that he has been looking into this at the smallest particle level. He's been guided by God as he does this. And you heard starting out,
the best and the brightest of all, what they're trained. It makes no sense to the professors. It makes no sense to the students. It makes no sense to the physicists, the scientists. So something is really wrong. This explains our whole world. Things don't make sense. And now we're coming to a point of the great awakening and the great exposure where we're all learning the truth together. All right, I'm ready. And you'll see,
I have three transparent films. Yes. Are you able to see through from the screen? Oh, okay. Yeah. Okay. I try to see through myself. Okay. So you can see through these three transparent films, right? Yes. You know the purpose I try to demonstrate is that light cannot be particle. Okay. That's the purpose. So now let's assume I'm using counter-argument. Let's assume light is a particle. Okay. Okay. So you see...
Light can go through individual transparent films. Yes. And also I stack them together. Yeah. So if light is a particle, so light can go through three of them, right? Right. So light, what is the logical response for if I take one away, only leave two transparent films here? Yes. So if I stack them, so light should be able to
the light should be able to go through two of them. Right. That's very logical, right? If light can go through three of them, light should be able to go through two of them until... Oh, wow! What you do? I don't get it. You no longer see through it. You may see reflection, okay? Right. You cannot see through it, right? So now you said, what did I do? Right. I did this. I rotate. Right. And why would that make a difference like that? So...
Why you rotate, suddenly light goes through. If I not rotate, light being blocked. Right. That means what? That means light cannot be particle. If a particle can go through three transparent film, so the particle should have nothing to do with I just rotate the angle. Is that right? Right. It should have nothing to do with that. Yes. So that means...
something else is in work. You almost there. Once you gather these two, I have to convince myself many, many different ways.
- Sure. - To conclude that we have to have a medium. - Yes, yes. - So now you see, so since the rotation, so what happens to these are, to these are transparent films. So these are basically is like a blind, is all stacked, all stacked the one way. You say like a blind, all stacked the one way. So a lot of light only goes through slit in horizontal ways or in vertical ways, but not in the other way.
So what happens? When light is a vibration, you know, anything vibrates. When you vibrate, the vibration has a plane, right? Whenever you want something to vibrate, vibration has to do plane. So in light, we call the polarized plane. So it means wave. Whenever you have a wave, wave vibrates has a plane. So in order to see light, we have to see the wave, the whole wave, vibration wave.
There's no particle involved, okay? Right. If a particle can go through, it can go through too. The reason it has no, it cannot see, you cannot see them is because light is not a particle. It's a wave. Now I try to explain why wave can do the magic things. Yeah. So,
Wave have a vibration plane. You have to see the whole kind of valleys and the peak. Yes. The vibrating whole period. Valley peak in order to see this wave and in order to perceive that light. So then, so these have one direction, the polarizer. Allow to say, in this case, allow light to vibrate this way. Go through. So we can see the whole position, polarizer.
whole trace of light, the wave. So it means peak to valley to medium, the whole cycle. What happens if I turn this around? So it blocks the wave. So X and the Y direction. So the wave from the wave oscillation, the wave cannot propagate through. So what do we see? However, if it's a particle, particle can go through it. In wave, wave cannot go through.
So that's where I said, oh my goodness, the truth is right under our nose. Yes. Right. So now I just want your audience, give a test of your audience. So now we know light is a wave. Wave needs a carrier, needs a medium, just like water in the pond, right? Yes. So what happens if I slide in this? I still have another one, right? Yeah.
I said, hey, light was able to go through three of them. So now I put two of them, block the light. So what happens if I put this one back in? Yeah, I put a third back. Are you able to see through it or not? Just give a guess. Yeah, I would say no. Yeah, because the light is being blocked. Right. And I'm not going to change this one. Right. So how come if I put another layer in there, even put it in the middle,
You still cannot see through, right? That's right. Can't. That's based on the concept of light is a particle. When we believe a particle, there's no way. Particle being blocked by two, how could a particle be going through three? Right. Look at it. I put it in the middle and it slides. I hope you can see. I can see. Yes, I can see. Slide from the
Now, you can see the background. You can see my screen. Yes, I can. Are you able to see? But you cannot see this part, right? That's right. I can't. Why is this? That's the wave phenomenon. The only explanation is the wave. There's no way. If you use particle theory, particle being blocked by two, how in the world do you put the third one in? It becomes transparent again.
wave phenomena. So I don't want to go into side, you know, because the wavelengths are so small. So that's why it only partially, 30, 45 degrees allow partially wave go through. And you see, I put 45 degrees, allow partially the wave to go through. And if somebody, I don't want it to be there, but just let the audience to come out and answer themselves. That's the assignment for wave property of light.
So you can leave that window and we can discuss it because that's going to take time. When I do a demonstration at the Kennedy Space Center, we just had to bring students today to work. So I left as assignment. I said, now you know what light is. Light 100 percent wave have nothing to do with particle whatsoever. Whenever we see sunlight, I just want to emphasize, whenever we see sunlight,
There is no particle traveling from the sun to go through the space after eight minutes at the speed of light, reaching to our eye at the speed of light. There's no particle. If that was true, we're going to be blind. Something traveled at the speed of light hit our eyes. So what we really see is the sun, the thermonuclear just created disturbance in this called electromagnetic medium.
just create ripples. And these ripples traveling through space. When we see the light, it's what? It's the particles in the medium. The particles in the medium, in the ripples, right? The next twilight is vibrating. The ripples is vibrating. It's transverse vibrating.
So what we see light is the disturbance of light source and create the repose wave. The wave propagates. Wave propagates is only propagates. You know how wave propagates is a vertical, is called a transverse.
So say if a wave vibrate vertically this way, the wave front goes horizontal 90 degrees. So that we call the transverse wave. But you don't have to care about that. The effect is when we see light, it is the particles next to our eyes vibrating, just vibrating. Wow. So based on, I'm sure whenever you explain this to students visiting at the Kennedy Space Center, they're probably like, what?
This is not what we're taught. What are you saying? Right. Completely different. Yes. And how does this knowledge change our world, change our perception, change the foundation of what all of you guys were taught that wasn't correct, that our world is based upon? Very good question. So then once I realized
the light is a wave, means wave have some kind of medium. So I was looking for smallest particle. The smallest particle, the fundamental called a building block of the matter. So I said, hey, now I find the particles in the medium are smaller than the light source, say electron, right? Like electron create the light, right? Electron motion.
And so I said, okay, so what's the particles in this medium? So now you follow my thoughts? Yes. And then we all know one thing is about it. The light wave or some particle, doesn't matter, is called electromagnetic. You know, sometimes the classical theory defines light as an electromagnetic wave.
Yes. So what happens? So that means this medium must have
Electromagnet must have a magnetic property. Yes, that's right. How can you carry an electromagnetic wave if this wave itself does not have an electromagnetic property? Does that make sense to you? Totally. If you can follow me, now I can see. If you can follow me, by the end, you will be better than most of the physicists and professors.
Just like my co-anchor. I'm a co-anchor called aNeighborsChoice.com. Yes. So that's mine. And he's a major. He's a communication major in college, right? Now he's talking about the physics now. Oh, sure.
I wanted to make sure you understand the properties of the medium. Once you know the properties of it, then you know what kind of particle can make this medium. Right. Does that make sense? Makes sense. Okay. I'm going to demonstrate with you. Probably, this is the only time I can demonstrate something for me from the very, very fundamental. One step at a time.
So maybe your audience like it. Maybe general public could like that one too. Okay. I'm going to demonstrate what the property of the medium. Once I know the property of the medium, then I can guess, right? So what particles make the medium?
Make sense to you? Yeah, it does. Yeah. Oh good. Another demonstration. So very exciting. This is a morning podcast. A very exciting morning. Okay. I can hardly wait. I hope you can see. I can. I use a golf ball and a spring. Elastic materials. Okay. Elastic materials in the world. You know, one thing is about all the materials.
Include the water, liquid, solid, liquid, or even gas. We are compressible, right? Everything can be compressed. However, you release the bouncing back. That means every material has elasticity. Does that make sense to you? Yes, it does. If no elasticity, you compress it, it will stay there. That's called a plastic deformation. You start there. We know you compress, you compress, the bouncing back. Yeah.
So I said, okay, the properties of, I'm going to focus on the property of the medium, right? In order for the medium to propagate the light, it has to have elasticity. If you, if you disturb one part, you know what happens? The rest of the medium vibrates with them. That's right. So that's why I said, okay, the medium has to be elastic. You follow me? Yes. Now,
If you make notes, your notes will be very, very important for audience to follow. I think when I take notes, it's like, okay, yes, got it. So now we started the property of the medium. And now we said that in order for medium to propagate light, it has to be elastic. So you have a disturbance at one point, it will propagate through the water, right? So, you know, okay. So now water force make elasticity.
Did you see my questions go deeper, right? Yes, yes. From the light, we know we need a medium. Yes. From the propagation of the medium, we try to understand what's the property of the medium. It has to have elasticity. Yes. Now, let's go one step deeper. Another question. See, if we keep asking our questions, we will still drill down to the fundamental particles. Yes.
Yes. Because you are such a, you're a psychologist, right? You're such a good listener. Okay. So thank you. I hope, I hope your audience can follow you and you can make an explanation to your audience what I'm heading to, right? They're following you. Trust me. If I am, they am. Oh, good. So what makes things elastic?
I just tell you. I'm not questioning. I know. I wouldn't answer anyway. Did you see I have three magnets? Did you see magnets? Oh, yeah. Oh, that's cool. That looks fun. I put it on the toy. My son sometimes, hey, this color distracting, you know.
But you know, little girls love it. I like it, you know. You like it, okay. I do. Did you see I have a magnet? And you know, what happens if I turn this way? Did you see the vibration part? Yes, I do. That's what the elasticity, did you see that's the elasticity part? Elasticity means you displace them, but once you release it, it has a recovery force go back. Yeah. I said, okay.
The medium must be elastic in order to propagate the light. Right. So where does the light, where does the medium come from? Where does the elastic come from? Right. Magnetism.
I can tell your eyes. The other day I was trying to explain some concept to Ashton Forbes. I don't know if you heard of this gentleman. Very smart young man. He has over 250,000, almost 300,000 followers on X. When I explained, I saw his eyes flash. Yeah.
You can see something going on in the Hebrew. I can see similarity from your side. So now we go further. The things that make this medium propagate has to have a magnet. Magnetic has to have a magnetic attraction and a repulsion. So it's not just attraction force. It has a repulsion force to keep them at a distance. Does that make sense? Yeah, it does. Now,
My questions to my students say, hey, if every matter are elastic matter, even diamond, okay, have elastic modules, okay? So, and in order for things to have elasticity, elasticity created by magnetic attraction and repulsion force. Yes. So then I ask, so what kind of, let's assume these are atoms, all the particle of the medium. So what these particles are?
Can you give a guess? No. No, this is your job. My job is to ask questions and understand. Lin, you are smarter than you believe. You may think this is a tricky question. Actually, this is very fun. What particle can create a magnetic force? Magnets.
Oh, so it was not a trick question. Very good. Okay. Yes. In order to create this medium, the particle has to magnetize the force of magnets. Only magnets can create repulsion and attraction. Right. So what's the particle in the medium that carries the light? Because the light wave can be infinitely short.
Right? Right. You can make light vibrate infinitely fast. That means the frequency is infinitely high and wavelengths can be infinitely short. Yes. So that means guarantee you the smallest particle can be infinitely small in this light carrying medium. Well, sure. Yes, that makes sense. And that particle has to have elasticity. Yes. It has to have magnetism. So what is the particle of the medium?
Are you asking me a question? Yes. Yeah. Or are you audience? I feel the pressure. Magnets. Magnets. Just magnet particles. Did you see? I drilled down. Yeah, you drilled down. The smallest particle. Yes. It has to be have a magnet. Without magnet, it's not going to come out with the elasticity. Without the elasticity, the medium cannot carry light. Right. Probably the light. Right. Okay. So now the questions for me, a deeper question now.
is this magnetic particle is the smallest particle in the world. We could have magnetic particles, right? But this particle can be the smallest and the only particle. I'm going to demonstrate that. Oh good, another demonstration. Once you understand this one, you will understand the entire physics. Oh wow. And I didn't even go get a degree.
Oh my goodness, you will find that you did not waste a time and any moment. You will feel like the PhD, most of the PhD started for, like me, 20 decades, right? Right. Probably,
say 24 years, probably 23 years are wasted in our time. You're almost there. I'm almost there. And of course, the 23 years weren't wasted. You had to learn all of that to learn what you didn't believe in. It's like our time here so far on Earth. We've been on Earth for many years, and everything we've learned is wrong. So now we're unlearning. I think it's great.
So now I try to say, remember, we already drew down, say, the smallest particle has to have a magnetic feature, right? That's right. But we don't know is the magnetic particle is the only particle can exist. Right, right. That's why I try to say, yes, if not the magnetic particle, it cannot exist, cannot be observed, and cannot have the universe we have.
So you know where I'm going, right? I do. I'm going to demonstrate. So what happens if a particle is not a magnetic particle? What happens? We, based on the current physics, say, hey, we have called an electron. Have you heard of an electron? Yes, I've heard of electrons. What an electron to you is a negative charge particle. Is that right? Yes. Smallest negative. And also, have you heard of a proton and a neutron? Yes.
Those are bigger than electrons, right? Almost 2,000 times bigger. Exactly will be 18,036 electron mass equivalent to one proton mass. Very good. Almost 2,000 times. And the proton, what a proton? Proton is a positive charge. So my question is,
They are not magnetic particles. You agree, right? They're not. Yeah. They're not magnetic particles. No. They said that they are negative charge and positive charge. Right. Can they exist? So that's my question. So I said, hey, let's assume this is an electron.
And this is a positron. You know, I did not use a proton. You can say this is a proton too, a possible charged particle, right? Since I made the size say electron and positron, they are opposite charged, same mass, okay, opposite charged. So can these things exist?
So I try to prove they cannot exist. You follow me? Wow, okay. You follow me? When you know these cannot exist, you know entire electromagnetic theory. It blows it up. Blows up. Entire physics is talking about what is chemical reaction. Electrons bonded with that one. So you already know the significance. So now I hope you follow my logic. Once you get this one,
You know, you did not waste any time. No, I didn't. Now, I'm going to use this one to demonstrate why electron, the negative charge part cannot exist. Right. Assuming this is a negative charge part. So what happens if I split as two halves? Did you see that one? I did.
You know, I did this one literally, but actually what I mean is figuratively. I hypothetically divide. Because anything, any particles are made by smaller components. Can we say that? Everything has a smaller component, right? And we know electron has a mass, right? Just half of the mass. So what kind of charge, you know, imagine, what kind of charge the half of the electron would carry?
We know electrons carry negative charge particles. Negative charge. So if you say, hey, half of them should have negative charge particle on half of them. Does that make sense to you? Oh, yeah. Logical sense, right? Can we? Okay, this is very important. If we hypothetically divide electrons into smaller pieces, so the smaller piece half would carry negative charge particles based on
everything we learn, right? Logically learn. Can we put them back together? If we have to have two of the negative charge particles, can we put them back together? Can we reunite them together? No, we can't. The reason is like charge repel. That's right. So if we cannot put them together, how does one exist in the first place?
Makes sense to you? Are you still following me? Yeah, I'm still following you. I hope your audience will follow me. I'm sure they are. The conclusion is that the so-called negative charge particle cannot exist. So the current definition of electron, hostron, or we say, hey, proton, cannot exist. No, it can't. And now that's the implication. Now let me tell you, if we cannot...
What kind of implication we have for physics? You're right. Yep. This is the physics model we have, right? Yes. Let me turn the light a little away from there, okay? Or this model. Yes. This is called, you know, that's the current physical model. It's based on this one. So we have an electron, R1.
free orbiting on the orbitals, you know, around the nucleus. Yes. That's our foundation. Yes. Of everything. Yes. Right? What's next? I try to, this foundation is fundamentally wrong. This model does not even exist. Right, right. Are you still following me? I said, this is the foundation of physics and this is not correct. We do not have these items like this one.
something else that we've been told that isn't true. I'm astounded at it. I'm listening. Okay. How we conclude that model? How we derive that model?
Science are not scientists. We have a lot of best and brightest ones, right? Initially, they based on the beliefs. I believe this is J.J. Thompson discovered electron and named the electron as a negative charged particle in 1897. In 1897. It's 19th century. And he named the electron as negative charged particle. What happens? And then
And he won Nobel Prize for that. And then somebody else discovered positron, I would say, called a proton. At least three people win Nobel Prize for that. And then somebody discovered neutron. You have a next-gen particle, you have a neutron particle.
and also with Nobel Prize. And then based on the carbon, if you have an electron and have a nucleus made by proton and neutron, how can they fit together? How this particle fits together? The only way is orbiting. They cannot contact. If contact, you know what happens, called the
matter-antimatter annihilation. Matter loss. That wouldn't be a good thing. That wouldn't be a good thing. So that's why the only thing they can keep in balance, say, if this is nucleus, electron cannot in contact, have to keep in motion, right? Right. And have to certain velocity. Right. It's a fraction of the speed of light. You know how speed, you know. Yeah. For every atom. So that's why we come out with this atomic model.
Yeah, yeah. Basically says every atom has so much motion, so many energies. And where comes this energy? Where comes this force? What keeps them constant motion? Nobody can explain. And that would make, if that is true, that would make every single atom be a perpetual motion machine. Yes, it would.
Right? Yes. And the atom is the most stable structure. So that's why we have atomic clock because we believe atoms are vibrations. You measure the frequency, vibration frequencies, right? So that's why we can make atomic clock. That's the most accurate clock right now we have. It's based on atomic model. Yep. So if every single atom is a perpetual motion, where comes the energy?
And physics, you know, physics know one thing. Very few things we can agree together. But the one thing we do agree, there's nothing called a perpetual motion machine. Because everything, all the motions, you have frictions, you have drags, you have interacts with neighboring, like every particles, right? Interacting with neighbors.
How can the energy that does not dissipate under every single atom constantly in motion like a perpetual motion machine? So that doesn't make sense, right? It does not make sense. And then, so you know, now you know the reason what's wrong with the atomic bomb, because we're assuming electron is a negative charge. Yes. Assuming protons are positive charge. Yes. That's the root cause. Yeah. And what happens if this is wrong?
this is wrong means this atomic model would not be correct, totally incorrect. There's nothing orbiting them. Just like we observed, you know, we have a lot of laboratory images of atoms, right? There's nothing rotated based on all the energies. There's nothing rotated. But we still blindly believe somehow inside of us believe. So now I want to tell you what the consequences
This is the latest and the greatest physics theory. Oh my goodness, the image is a mirror image, okay? That's quantum mechanics. That's called the standard model of particle physics. That's the latest and greatest theory of humankind. If you look at the center model, the center...
The little, what is it, blue-ish, the center, that's considered of the nucleus. Made by, did you see those things have protons and neutrons? And the proton neutrons are made by even smaller particles called quark. We don't have to care. But you know, what about the yellow ring, the outside ring? That's where the orbital is, right? Electrons orbiting that one.
What that means, entire, the latest, greatest physics we are teaching in the universe on every textbook, physical textbook, unfounded. Unfounded. Well, they...
I'm astounded at how people can just make stuff up, get Nobel Prizes, and then teach us all their fantasies as if it was all true. And then we all base everything we do on these fantasies that people make up to get Nobel Prizes when I could do it. You know, I mean, I could sit here and make stuff up, Dr. Yu. I think your work does propel you towards winning Nobel Prizes.
Thank you. Nobel Peace Prize. Nobel Peace Prize. Not physics, no. No, that's what you need. You know, I do have a pushback. I noticed one professor, a very smart and a very prominent professor. I don't want to say his name. And he made a video about
try to counter my point. They say, hey, Dr. Weeping Yu said electrons can be split into two.
Even though I said this hypothetically, you don't have to actually speak it right, hypothetically. Just imagine what happens tomorrow. He disagreed. And he also disagreed. Oh, you mentioned about gravity. Gravity is not a fundamental force. He said, since Albert Einstein developed the general theory of relativity,
Gravity defined of the bending of the space and the time, you know. Geometric something. I don't know anybody truly understand. If you understand your work, that make no sense. Right, right. And he also, hey, W claims there is no called, oh, there is no free electrons orbiting the atoms. He said, since we thought,
Over 100 years, we know there's an electron orbiting the nucleus. Wow. He shoots the pictures. Okay. Wow. You know, I have no personal feeling against him. He's respectful.
physical processors at the West Coast, a very famous professor, and he's leading with the research and made lots of presentations. I believe somebody mentioned about that he's almost a Nobel Prize winner. You can do the research, okay? Yes, yes. Somebody mentioned about the things, say, hey, somehow Dr. Yu said there is no strong nuclear force and weak nuclear force does not exist.
So you are messing with their holy grail. I mean, you are messing with their foundational principles, trying to tell them that all of the who we that they have been preaching to everyone else is wrong and they can't take it. You know, so they're going to give pushback. I think it's I think it's fascinating. That's this has happened to every person that I know that I call a truther.
where they have the truth and they're speaking, if it goes against the grain, if it goes against what we've been taught our whole life. Establishment. The establishment. Or against the grain. Yes, that's exactly right. They push back and they can push back hard and they bring the...
highly educated, highly, and I'm putting this in air quotes, very professional, the elite, the biggest of the best to say we're wrong, but it doesn't matter anymore. It's like you said, these degrees, these degrees are rather meaningless, you know, even in physics. I find it fascinating that no matter what the field is, we've just been
not told the truth and they keep regurgitating it and regurgitating it and repeating it as if what was it? Was it Barnum Bailey that said, if you say something over and over and over, people just believe it. So people just. A lie repeat. Someone said that lies repeat a thousand times or becomes a truth. Yes, yes, yes. And we're all here in our own.
areas that God's called us to to dispel the lies with the truth. We have about 25 minutes left. God, how did God play a part in your discovery and in urging you to keep down this path? You know, most of the scientists, just like me, we
When we were starting, we do not think about the particle. Right. But you know what happens? When you drill down the questions, that's where I found that we cannot avoid the particle. You know the reason? They said, hey, if based on your theory, the smallest particle
only particle. I call the U-on, universal particle, U-on. Does now the U-on make sense to you? Oh, it does. Un means particles, right? Yes. U means universal particle, and the only particle. Yes. Is a magnetic particle. So people say, who made this magnetic particle? What's the origin of magnetic particle? Yes. I cannot explain, as you say. It existed forever. Myself, or
Could be simple as God make it. Does that make sense to you? Because I really have no answer. But I thought, okay, that's an easy way to say this is the time we say that who created this matter. And I believe that's the fundamental form of the matter is magnetic matter.
If not a magnet, you know what happens? We cannot combine two particles together. Somebody would say, hey, can gravity combine matter together? No, gravity cannot combine two matter together. Gravity force is too weak, just like sand. You cannot make two sands form a bigger sand, right? There's not enough force. So what force makes them combine? I would say magnetic force.
How big is the magnetic force? Magnetic force equals to 10 to the 36th power of gravity force. You see, 10 to the 36th power. 10 times E, 36 is 0, greater than that. So that's why if we just gravity without this magnetic force, we will never see a particle in our eye anywhere. So the universe will not be exist.
So I hope I gave you answer. See, so when do I find the need God? You know, I would say, oh, no way. There's no way you can. I cannot explain this one. I cannot say who create the magnetism. I cannot explain. Who create matter magnetism?
In the first place, I cannot explain that one. Right? So this is a part of, I believe, oh my goodness, something has created. I want to emphasize one thing. Previously, I talked about in the ancient Greeks, concept of atom is indestructible, indivisible particles. They never mentioned about magnetic particle, means it does not carry magnetism. So in U-Wand theory,
You want the smallest particle is a universal magnet fundamental, magnet particle. Magnet particle, what happens? It carries positive charge and negative charge at the same time. Yes, it does. Yes, it does. Another place I found, you know, I just try to educate myself. Am I able to explain these things?
without incurring a super, you know, super nature, you know, like God or the beings, right? Another way is I read the Bible, a Bible talking about, you know, the consciousness or everybody, you know, said God or Jesus residing in every drop of blood, every particles, every cell, every particles in your body, right? Right. So I said, so what the particles are?
What are the things really reside in every single cell, single particles? You are particles. Yes. That's made up of all the particles in the universe. Wow. And it resides everywhere. So that means there's a magnetic force, the positive and negative, like pole repel and opposite pole attract. That's a fundamental law. Exists everywhere and includes everything.
not the origin of the universe, and include the origin of life, include the origin of consciousness. If you are interested, I can explain. But just say. I'd love your thoughts. Yes, you just share what you want to. Okay, I just share with you about the origin of consciousness. Yes. If you look at the definition of consciousness, right? The definition of consciousness is awareness. Awareness, existence of yourself.
and the surroundings. How can you awareness yourself and the surroundings? Through what? That means you have a through, over distance. You can tell their object. If you have a magnet nearby a refrigerator door, right? It will be attract, pull you in there, it will attract you. And two magnets opposite, they can repel. Right.
Yeah, like who would attract opposite pole. So magnets is something can sense awareness over distance, can sense object over distance. So the consciousness is really a manifestation of magnetic fields.
Wow. Have you think about it? When you thought of, just like we are talking about, we are sharing something, your thoughts may not be contained inside your brain. Do you feel like that? Your thoughts could go beyond the brain, right? That's right. Sometimes it could be so big, you know. Yes. Because the consciousness is stored as electromagnetic signals in this magnetic field. I hope that makes sense to you.
Well, it does. And let me put this in my words and see if it matches what you're saying. So I have always believed, and it has been my experience, that I go to the creation story in Genesis in the Bible, and God created everything. And he did it with words and thoughts. So I have always believed.
Believed that words and thoughts carry a frequency that has creative power, like a ripple effect. And so in my mind, the consciousness, we can start manifesting things in reality by what we think. So for example, during COVID, there was so many lies and people were,
bought into the lies and the fear. And they started thinking and speaking fear, and all of a sudden everything got worse and worse and worse. And I believe that part of that was because we unintentionally created it from that ripple effect of everyone... Resonance, the ripple effect to the entire becomes a group... Yes. Group effect, right? Yes. It's called the herd mentality, is that right? Yes.
And I've always thought, believed, and I do it based on Genesis, God created and we're children of God. So what we say, the frequency that comes, you know, as we speak, we're emitting ripples of frequency. And as we think, that comes out as ripples of frequency and it has creative power outside of us. People resonate with you. When people resonate with you,
the same things resonant theoretically could, the intensity can go through called infinite. Yes. So that's why can manifest becomes, wind sounds could become entire movement. Yes. In the entire universe. Yes. I do. I do. Yes. And whenever we all get together, so we think about the things happening today,
That we're very unhappy with. And your field is one. I mean, physics has never made sense. It hasn't made sense to anyone. And yet they're perpetuating this falsehood there. It's everywhere. I mean, you name the system and it's just perpetuating. And because we didn't know and bought into it by our words and thoughts, we perpetuated things that aren't true. But now we're,
Now we have a break in that perpetual ripple effect, like this conversation. It's like, no, we're stopping that false ripple effect and we're creating a true one, which can change the world. Yes. I feel we are resonating our thoughts. I hope we can generate this wave or even movement fundamentally. Yes.
Yes. Changing our world through technology innovation. One problem I have with the current kind of called the standard model of physics, it has no guidance, no guidance, no principle, no direction to chemistry, have no use to chemistry, only make chemistry super complicated.
Those electrons somehow have to bind in location, but they are not orbiting. If they are not orbiting, then what happens? They can be catastrophic. They're going to impact with the nucleus. We have no guidance, no help to chemistry.
and even counterproductive to biology. Biology is talking about mass. The universe is not chaotic, it started. Universe gradually becomes older, right? So that's why things can grow from quite planets or animals or human beings.
Human is not like eventually dissipated entropy, you know, dissipated becomes useless energy. That's exactly falsehood. So biology professor probably have a stronger support for me. So based on physics, you're talking about the second law of thermodynamics.
Everything becomes dissipated, useless, without structure. So how, why do we see everything come out with life, with growing, with something, is advancing the society, right? And also have no guidance to medicine, to medical, to medical, you know, human health.
nutrition, health, and the medicine, all those kinds of generated so many, you include some called what is a vaccine or some kind of drugs, some cancer therapies only destroy people's immune systems. And eventually people die, not because of the disease itself, becomes a cure, is worse than disease. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. And
All of this, I mean, this is so boiled down so simply to me. What you've discovered simplifies all of this. It just brings such peace and calms everything down to where it's simple. And then that's the foundation to build on. Because you're right. Based on the false foundation they gave us, it's infiltrated everything, biology, medicine, and their culture.
creating worlds that are destructive, believing that we were created in chaos and we're going to disappear and waste to nothing. So they're contributing toward that as opposed to
We're building, we're growing, we're getting better, we're evolving, we're improving. That is not part of our models. That is not part of our biology. I find this astounding, Dr. Yu. I mean, on so many levels, what you've discovered is astounding. It gives us the physics that's the foundation of belief systems that
To be able to, I believe moving forward, we're here to create a better world.
We're not here to continue on believing all these falsehoods we've been told since it appears the 1800s. It appears like that's whenever quite a bit of this started, all these falsehoods in all of our fields. And we're here now to uncover the truth. Well, uncover the falsehoods and explain why they're false and then explain what actually is happening.
And then that way we can take that and remove from our current systems all the falsehoods and put in the truth so that we can build a better world. Yeah? I 100% agree with you. You are on a mission, and I want to join your mission. Make awareness to public. Not only those abused child, right? And even for general public. We are somehow...
some thoughts are still in stone age, in the darkest age. I want to make you one example. Actually, my host, my co-host, David Gnorski, he mentioned, he said that one audience after our radio show sent him a note, somehow Dr. Yu's theory saved his life.
He said he feels tired, lived only in 30s or something, probably will be, will see, get tired of all the material things. And finally, why am I struggling with the universe? I don't understand any of them.
Talking about physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, something. It feels like I'm tired of life. He sent the notes to me. I still kept those notes. Somehow. So I thought the important thing for me is the journey I started to try to understand the universe for my own purpose. So I feel like at peace after I discovered in 2013
over 10 years ago, 12 years ago. And I feel like my mission or my goal of life, maybe that's the God, you know, empowered everybody have their personal journey. And I have a total peace with me. I no longer afraid to die because I already know my final or fundamental form of matter is just a little tiny of nuance, the little magnets.
And what happens after you dissolve yourself? The consciousness, my consciousness could still exist in this universe, in the field, right? The thoughts or something could be still there. However, my physical body, either the fundamental state is a magnetic part, started coming, combined self, started evolving itself, could come back more someday. Maybe not back to this form, but it could be eternally lives in some form.
That's beautiful. That's beautiful. Well, this has been a very lovely discussion. And I'm so honored to have you on my podcast today. And you have taught me so much and opened my eyes to so much that I never
Never knew, as I know, none of my audience has ever heard before. And I love hearing the truth. I love hearing where we haven't been told the truth, what it actually is. So that way we can move forward more peaceful and in a manner to rebuild and create the world that we want.
So thank you so much for your time today. Thank you so much for your knowledge and your expertise and your message. It is a huge blessing to me. Do you have any final words before we close off?
I'll just say, number one, it's such an honor to discuss with a prominent psychologist and just treat this as a human being. So my appreciation. The second thing I wanted you all to know, the universal X-ray is very simple. It's only made by one particle. You know the particle of yuan? Just a little magnetic particle. And all the existing
things are composite particles made by just fundamental magnetic particle. The universe is very simple and with this new discovery, I believe we can have free or cheap energies for everybody and we can develop new technologies. We can transmute the materials into different types
like in old days, alchemy or something, right? But I do believe, you know, if we understand that the structure, the only thing is different than structure. If we understand the fundamental property and it's different structure, once we understand we can make any real earth materials or any precious metals available in your laboratory, we don't have to fight never-ending wars, right?
by the input resource. The universe could be very simple and God is great. It will help everybody. So that's my final words.
Well, amen. And I love that because it gives hope and our ability to create better things for humanity. I love that. And one small correction. I'm not officially a psychologist. It's true. My master's is in industrial organizational psychology, and it's a form of psychology.
And frankly, after all the years of therapy I've had, I feel like a psychologist.
You're probably better than most psychologists just based on their education, based on the degree. Yeah, and I would agree with that. I would absolutely agree with that. So God bless you for being on my show today and having all this knowledge and expertise to give us. And I always close my show with the truth, which is God is absolutely good. Thank you.