Vaccine Nanobots Spreading to the Unvaxxed? w/ Dr Carrie Berkovich
01:20:05 Share

Well, we're back with Dr. Carrie Berkovich, who joins us again. We've had a lot of great programs with her in the past and her expertise on natural alternative solutions for really the failing corporate health system. It continues to be questioned by more and more people thanks to efforts like Make America Healthy Again by Nicole Shanahan and

Robert Kennedy Jr. Limited as they are within the confines of a deeply corrupt government, it still opens up people who are more unfamiliar with the world of questioning, what your doctor tells you is gospel, to think about it in deeper ways. So how are you doing, Kerry?

I'm doing great. Thank you for asking. And thanks again for having me on your podcast today. Yeah, it's great to have you. And I'm glad you could take a moment away from your sailing there to join us. Yeah, my screenshot. Actually, if I could, I'd put my scuba diving video behind me as my screensaver. Yeah, that's what you had to do. Do a podcast with this while you're scuba diving with the screen protected. That's right.

surrounded by dolphins that would be amazing yeah that's that's a great way to get people to pay attention to their health right you know you always got to find creative ways to make these sometimes dry and complicated topics approachable for everybody so that they can do things to take care of their health so one of the things that we wanted to pick up on is kind of

What's going on with these products? And I want to use, you know, I try to use words that are not picked up because we're on various platforms that still have the fascist censorship going on. So I like to call it the greatest product ever designed in medicine that everybody was told to take. But there's shorter ways to say it. But let's talk about that. You know, people were told to take this product and they're still having some scary experiences.

implications for that. In fact, there was a recent study. What was it that made mainstream media attention where they did a study? Was it Yale where they found some really alarming information that people who had taken these products still had the spike protein in their body way? Like I was over 700 days past, you know, the time they had taken the product initially and that they were demonstrating effects that were similar to HIV and

Yes. Immune carbonization, AIDS? Yes. I mean, as you mentioned, that was on the mainstream and they're still calling it the spike protein. But for the sake of discussion, I call it a synthetic toxin responsible for immediate and delayed negative effects, sometimes resulting in death, in fact.

Just this morning, there is a headline, at least on the Gateway Pundit, that there is a congressman who just died suddenly, which is basically the code word of what happens with a certain injectable product. In fact, I have a nice sad story of my own. Last week, my mentor from dental school died suddenly. And nobody, with the exception of maybe a couple of people, are making any connection to me.

What was the status of taking an injectable, not taking an injectable? And what's really important for people to understand is that this is not a one-off shoot. Oh, I did not get a negative effect when I got injected. Therefore, I'm out of the woods. This is the key problem, which is what we're going to uncover today, that the technology employed in these injectables

is self-replicating, it's nanotechnology. Certain words were used as a red herring to kind of, oh, look over here, not over there, as far as what's really in it. But the idea is that the further away you go from the time of being injected, the less association you will have whether or not it has any merit than your health condition.

And because I deal with people who are trying to optimize their health and I go and I dig deep with sometimes uncomfortable questions, like what happened here? What happened there? And

Or even the people who are so-called in the understanding of what's really going on. Even for those people, sometimes it's very difficult to make that connection of like, are you suggesting that what I did a year, two or three years ago has any merit to what I'm experiencing today? And they said, answer it, yes.

So the study that you're referring to, I think you're correct, it was Yale. There was another one recently published by a Japanese group. But they are still calling it, you know, the words spike protein and all that, you know, it's accumulating. Unfortunately, we should be focusing a little bit more in detail. And I like to call the enemy by the exact words that that enemy is.

And we're going to talk about it, self-replicating nanotechnology that is been employed in this vast sci-op hoax

called mass injections globally and what's really in it and why it's still serious to this day and age. So the study that I'm referencing is the very first study of real-time self-assembly of stereomicroscopically visible artificial constructions in incubating specimens of C19 shots from products by Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Novavax.

The study was published in July of 2024, and the authors are from South Korea, Dr. Lee and Daniel Brody, who is the English scholar from Japan. The publication went to International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research, Volume 3, Number 2, in case the audiences want to refer to this. I've actually made a series of PowerPoint presentation slides that will be attached to the show notes.

The study name, the source where it came from, abstract, as well as the images are there for people to see. That's why we're not going to bother with sharing the screen so we can just move on to kind of going through what happened there. So essentially, the study was broken into two halves.

The first one was looking at toxicity. What do the vial contents do to blood, live blood, as well as semen? And then the second part was what happens with contents of the vials as you replenish moisture with sterile saline or normal saline solution over the period of time, basically over two years in the study and still ongoing, and what is happening under the microscope?

Now, I'm going to make a statement. This is a stereo microscope. Therefore, they can actually see movement. And the magnification is 400x. So not the highest, but that's a whole different story of why we don't have the microscopes that were available at the turn of the century, like by Royal Reif, that actually looked at the movement at 15,000 or 17,000 megabits.

So let's go on to the first portion of this study that looked at toxicity. So basically, as a lot of people have heard, blood clots were happening and those had been injected. Some people were fainting, developing strokes and things like that. And there's a very simple explanation for that. The reason is that when they added the contents of the injectable vial by both productions of actually all three productions of Pfizer's, Moderna and Novavax,

The red blood cells basically formed a wall trying to ward off the invader. But within 30 minutes, majority of the red blood cells were dead.

And what the red blood cells do, they carry oxygen in a simplified view of things. That's why hypoxia or inability to breathe and fainting and having strokes and things like that was one of the commonly reported negative effects after being injected, whether on the spot, two weeks later, two months later, two years later even.

So the toxicity of red blood cells was confirmed. The second toxicity that was confirmed is white blood cells. So those are the cells that are basically engaged in warding off invaders. There are different types of them. I'm not going to go into detail because that's not important for the sake of this conversation. But what is important

is that the contents of the injectable in all three, Novavax, Pfizer, and Moderna, have produced negative effects of killing the white blood cells, essentially fragmenting them, and going specifically after the nuclei, which is where the DNA, the genetic blueprint of the cell is located. So all of those protocols of basically decomposed cells were popping up.

The third damage was to the platelets. Those are the types of blood cells that are responsible for

the bleeding when there is an injury, basically clotting. So when you have injury to platelets, you can have thrombosis, which is too much clotting, or you can have excessive bleeding. So all of those effects were observed in injected people throughout the globe. So basically, the study showed what happens. And by the way, I did not mention the word within 30 minutes. This is what happened within 30 minutes of adding the blood to the contents of the injectable.

The other interesting thing was what happened with semen. And they collected the samples from both people who have received the injection and those who were uninjected. The uninjected were faring a little bit better as far as time of how long it took to produce toxicity. But essentially, after 24 hours of incubation, 99% of the sperm cells were dead.

So it's no wonder we're now having issues with overall loss of fertility throughout the world and infertility on the rise. And the sperm toxicity is definitely accounting for a lot of, even if there is a conception,

a lot of fetal malformations, abnormalities and fetal growth and so forth. So basically it's been confirmed that both the blood as well as the semen, two vital fluids of the bodies were negatively affected by the contents of these injections.

The other part of the study focused on longitudinal, meaning over time, analysis of what is happening with contents of these vials. So these researchers were very good, and I'm kind of going a little off tangent, but most so-called viral isolation studies are completely fraudulent, and we can talk about it in a different podcast because that actually requires, in my opinion, quite a bit of attention.

So what they used to do is basically produce a toxic soup of antibiotics, antifungals, all sorts of media, fetal serums. And what that did is you couldn't really prove isolation of so-called virus that has been in existence. So what these people did, these researchers, she only used normal saline.

So there were no additives, there was no media, there were no so-called nutrients required for the contents of this injectable to have some sort of an effect. So this is why her study is so important because basically, I'm going to just read a couple of summaries here. What she found out is that within zero to about seven to eight days of just keeping the vials under the microscope and adding saline so they don't dry out,

She observed progressive self-assembly of different types of particles, rods, disc lights, chains, spirals, ball chains, that at first initially started as two-dimensional. And as the time progressed by two to three weeks and beyond, they became three-dimensional.

And they made nanofilaments, ribbons, tapes, spirals, beaded chains, and so forth. So I have included in my slides the actual photos for people to see so they don't take my word for it and they see what kind of garbage is there. What do you mean two-dimensional to 3D? I mean, everything in reality is three-dimensional. 3D, indeed. So you're absolutely right. But what was interesting is that let's say you have

two objects that initially connect with each other. Then they start coiling over each other and create different type of structures. So what was interesting that they found is that these

self-assembling nanotech nanobots were shapeshifters. At first, they were spirals. Then they became disks. Then they became something else. Then some of them were described as, quote, unquote, hydro-like, which is basically one of the parasites. And it was continuing on for days and weeks and, in some cases, over two years. So the self-assembly is a very important part

topic here because most people this kind of relates to the longevity of the effects most people think well if I did not get an inadvertent effect with this injection then I'm out of the woods unfortunately that's not the case and

And what's another situation that another thing that they have discussed in the study is effects of certain external stimuli, such as EMF 5G wireless phone charger. They also looked at the hard drive of the computers. They looked at heat. And just to summarize, what has been found out is that when they were incubating the contents of these vials over time,

When they were subjecting it to normal room temperature, the self-assembly took about two to three weeks. However, when they increased the temperature to about 98.5 Fahrenheit, which is the normal body temperature,

the structure started to self-assemble overnight. And that's important because that's what happens when you inject somebody, it goes directly into your bloodstream and it's under the temperature of what your body is. So the effect of the body temp is absolutely detrimental as far as the production and self-assembly of these nanostructures.

The second effect was observed by the emission of the EMF from the 5G wireless charger. Who observed this? This is the lady in the first? That's the Lee and Brody study. So Dr. Lee is in South Korea and Daniel Brody is in Japan. This is all this one study. How did they measure the 5G effect? They used the voltage meter.

So I have some notes exactly as to what that was. Give me one second. So they were just using the normal 5G towers ambient to their environment? No, no. What they did is they used the wireless charger and put a cell phone on the wireless charger, which was connected to the 5G.

Of the normal town or whatever. Correct. Correct. Yes. In South Korea, to be exact. Somewhere in South Korea. I don't know exactly the name of the town. But basically, the effect of the emission of the EMF by that device...

propelled the self-assembled nanobots to make more structures kind of in an exponential manner. So now we know that the body heat activates it, as well as the 5G EMF energy, electromagnetic frequency that activates it.

They study microwave, they study ordinary microwaves, microwave ovens and Wi-Fi and all that. They studied the Wi-Fi only in this particular experiment, but... 5G or Wi-Fi? Both, Wi-Fi and 5G, both. So as you know, most of our routers are preset to 5G nowadays, used to be 4G. But what's interesting, since we're on the topic of the EMF and this whole technologies thing,

The nanotechnology and nanodevices, I should say, that are below 2400 Hertz do not need to be registered. The medical devices under 2400, so 2.4G, do not need to be registered. But do they still emit the harmful EMFs? Absolutely, they do. But in this particular study, I

That's all she did is she studied the wireless charger, the effects of the 5G. She studied the hard drive connected with a wire to the computer that didn't really produce much, and they looked at the heat. The other important thing was that, and I did not mention it, I should have said it right away at the beginning, is when they just looked at the contents of the vial, the concentrate itself, right?

There wasn't much of the movement. There wasn't that much of the nanotech observed. However, the minute they added the sterile saline, which is basically what's used to make the injectable, the fluid, the minute that was introduced, the self-assembly took a whole different speed. So it's almost like as if they received that command to propagate.

And that's disheartening to understand that these injections are completely programmable and influenced by external stimuli. Because saline is made up of salts, and the salts are what conduct your magnetic fields in your body. It's basically normal saline. It's the equivalent of normal pH in the body. So by itself, it shouldn't really be...

producing any sort of, oh, speaking actually about this for a second, they did test the saline by itself. So they just put a drop of saline on the slide, see what happened with the effect of the 5G, nothing.

And then, so she did have basically a control versus test. But when she put the contents of the vial together with saline and put it on the wireless charger connected to 5G, that's when the self-assembly of the nanobots basically took a whole different level. So the...

Issue that was really brought up here was that not only these nano nanobots, which, by the way, as far as the quantification, she was able to see that somewhere in the neighborhood of 300 to 400 million structures per mil, which is astronomically huge. So the self-assembly and disassembly and the reassembly continued on for over two years.

which tells you that there are... What do you mean it continued on, like continuously in the lab, just sitting there? Yes. How did they monitor it every day? She basically had daily monitoring of her samples, and she continues to do so. The study is still progressing. She published the results. Yeah, go ahead. Was it compounding into a more and more complicated structure or just maintaining random assemblages?

So it was compounding into more complicated structures. The peak occurred anywhere between two to six months. Then some of the filaments showed sign of degradation and then the reassembly a year plus later. Moderna was the worst of the offenders in that way, but Pfizer wasn't that much better.

So basically, the idea is that the contents of these injections act as semiconductors, and that's why they respond to the 5G and proximity to EMF.

So what people need to understand is that that's why the cascade of biological events such as clotting or bleeding or strokes developing, they are going to be linked to whether or not the person who has received the injection is in proximity to the harmful EMF radiation.

That's another reason to go to the country, maybe. 100%. 100%. Yeah, get out of the cities. I mean, we can talk about 15-minute city agendas and things like that, but I don't want to deviate too much from the subject. But absolutely, you may remember in my previous podcast, we talked about mitigation strategies, and I was very adamant about turning off your Wi-Fi router at night. Yeah.

No electronics in the bedroom where you sleep, no cell phones. Get rid of the technology like Ring, whatever, Google, Alexa. You don't need any of that. And EMF mitigation by grounding, which is basically putting your bare feet on Mother Earth's

will allow the alternating current, which is man-made damaging current that's running through a lot of these devices, will allow the alternating current to be absorbed by the earth and instead allowing the DC, the direct current, God's made current, the way our bodies are supposed to run, to take prevalence.

So that's why grounding, as simple as it sounds, is one of the mitigation strategies for people who have been injected and those who have not been injected, as we will uncover in a few more minutes why those who resisted the tyranny, I salute you, but we're not out of the woods, unfortunately. So the next thing that the study has focused on, we talked about longevity, we talked about toxicity, is the analysis, what's in these shots?

And before I continue on, I just want to give a shout out to a few researchers, namely La Quinta Columna and those researchers, that's the group in Spain, that were the first on the market to talk about diabetes.

the presence of graphene oxide in the injectables. And they were, of course, ostracized. But at this point, we have multiple centers from different parts of the world that talk about the composition of what's in the jab and why graphene oxide is part of it, which I'll get to in just a second. So La Quinta Columna, Dr. Anna Mihalche, Dr. David Young, a lot of these people have produced very similar outcomes.

And I'm not saying that that's in every single vial, because that's another thing that even people on the so-called freedom movement side tend to kind of get wrapped up too much about. Not a single person on this earth have analyzed every single vial. And having said that, I will also add not a single person on this earth has ever found saline in the vial.

meaning nothing there. It's a speculation that some vials are more harmful than others. And I'd like to reference the work of Sasha Latipova, who is a brilliant researcher, used to be a pharma insider and a researcher. And she's part of the group Enigma. Enigma is not just United States based. Not the band Enigma.

Yes, there was a band enigma indeed, but for Sasha, she's banded together with a lot of researchers in group enigma. And Sasha has published an article in her sub stack, which some people may know, called How Bad Is Your Batch?

And yes, you could type in your lot number and you can figure out if it's bad or less bad or not so bad. But I want to be very, very clear. There is not a single vial that produced just saline, so-called placebo outcome.

So, as we all know, there is no insert on these vials. In other words, the contents are being withheld for a very good reason. And they do all vary. There is no question about it. But the issue that I'd like to make is that if you understand the

biochemical analyses of some of these vials with elemental analyses, which I'm going to get to in just a second. It'll start making sense why things like graphene oxide were popping up on alternative media and, of course, being shut down on mainstream as nonsense, but they're not such nonsense anymore. So in the Korean group, which is the study I'm referencing still... Wait, just a pause, but too long, but...

Did they study the Chinese and the Russian vaccines too in this study? No. So they only had to be exact. I'll tell you what the exact number of vials that was studied here were 50 vials by Pfizer and Moderna with residual liquid, meaning those were the vials that were used to inject people. There were two unopened vials by Pfizer

There was one unopened vial by Moderna and one unopened vial by AstraZeneca. Now,

Interestingly enough, you brought up the issue of Russian and Chinese. I don't know much about Chinese, but the Russian version called Sputnik was supposedly not containing the same vector, in other words, the carrier of this lovely technology. But the vector really does not matter whether it's the so-called carrier

mRNA-based injection, and that's, I'll get there in just a second, why the whole thing could be a red herring too, or adenovirus, which is what Russian Sputnik contained as a vector. The idea that's important here is that when they studied, in this particular Korean study, when they studied the contents of the vial, they found proteins. That by definition,

is not something that was published or talked about. You can call it contamination. But the amount of proteins found was astronomically high and huge. And AstraZeneca, by the way, is the type of the injection that was not based on so-called mRNA. It was using another vector.

So the contents related to proteins tell you that these injectables contain the

So synthetic toxins, some call it spike protein. We went over in my, I think, original podcast that the synthetic spike protein is basically derived from snake venom conglomerates. Synthetic, I mind you. I want to be very, very clear. I don't mean to say that they use snakes to take their venom originally and put in the vial. No, this is synthetic peptides of, you know, that were similar to how...

Yes. Down a notch. It's similar to how ozempic is a synthetic form of the reptile. I mean, the lizard. The Gila monster. Yep. Venom, right? Similarly, how a lot of other drugs, a lot of blood pressure drugs are venom based. Like we talked about lisinopril, lasartan. Yes. I think that's important to take the exotic. Could that possibly be out of the picture there?

Yes. Now, I think is widely considered that and that's on the market and everybody's got it. Nobody disputes. Yes. Yes. No, it's it's the work that was done by Dr. Brian Artis with regards to the.

discovery of what kind of snake venoms and other creature venoms were used, it was actually backed up by other researchers. We talked about Dr. Shetty from South Africa, who also found, I think, like 26 or 30 different venoms when he analyzed the excretions from C19-injected people. So yes, 100%, this is synthetic venoms.

toxin that some people call spike protein. It does not come from the virus. We can talk about the whole idea that not a single virus has ever been purely isolated, including this one. So the idea is that the injections contain dangerous proteins and not to veer too much off, but essentially our immune system is designed to recognize self versus enemy.

So if a foreign protein comes into the body, immune system is supposed to recognize it as enemy and mount an immune response. But if this synthetic toxin is masquerading itself and hiding itself, and this is how it does it, the coating of this synthetic toxin protein is made of pegylated lipids, PEG, which is polyethylene glycol,

is what's used to confuse the immune cells and say, I'm not so bad. Don't worry about killing me or destroying me. So peculated lipids is what's important of why these toxins are persistent in the body because they're evading the immune system in a simplified view. The other thing is that in nature, thanks to the wonderful work of Karen Kingston, who pointed that out,

There are no positively charged cationic lipids. They don't exist. In nature, all good molecules carrying negative charge would actually create the blood flow because two negatively charged particles, basic physics, will not attract each other. They will repel from each other. So in nature, we don't have cationic or positively charged lipids, but this thing certainly produced them. So the presence of protein is an important thing.

The presence of sucrose is an important thing because we'll get there in just a second too. And it also produced acidic pH. The contents of the vials contained sucrose, foreign proteins, which by themselves should never be there. And we can talk about what's in those proteins. A lot of people were focusing on the cancer-promoting sequence called SV40.

Yes, it's possible that it's there in everything or not anything or some of it. But the idea is that the injections contain proteins by themselves, which throws the whole kind of curtain above the word mRNA. Do they truly contain modified RNA?

These researchers from South Korea and Japan, they beg to differ. In fact, I'm going to kind of bring up the work of another researcher that I follow. Her name is Maria Chrysler, and she works with Global Healing Institute, Dr. Edward Group.

And Maria begs to differ in the same way because when she did the analysis, elemental analysis of what was, you know, in the vial reacting with her own blood and she's uninjected. And then looking at it from the perspective of what kind of composition it is. There was yttrium, cesium, tellurium, aluminum, carbon, oxygen, and silicone.

And the distinguishing characteristic is not just the presence of these elements, but the percentage. So a healthy, natural red blood cell contains about 20% oxygen, 0.4% of the silicone.

We will get there in just a sec. But what she found, the contents of the vial, I think she was analyzing Pfizer. When she mixed them with her own blood and she incubated it for, I believe, 26 or 30 days, the red blood cells, her own red blood cells, died, which that's what they're supposed to do within about a day. What happened on day 26 was the weirdest thing.

There were new red blood cells found, but they were not the same as natural human red blood cells. It was synthetic biology of whatever the content of the vial that has reacted with regular human red blood cells, which died later on, extracted certain things like hemoglobin, iron in particular, and then formed a different type of synthetic red blood cell.

And this is what her analysis came about, that the composition of those synthetic red blood cell was nowhere near natural. The silicone was anywhere between 8 to 14 percent. The oxygen was at 40 percent. If you put two and two together and carbon was elevated, too, that's the substrate of making graphene oxide.

So in a sentence, what is the distinction between what they're claiming is in these products and what mRNA is?

Okay. So first of all... And the top line says, what do you think? Like, what's the distinction? I think the distinction is that there is no mRNA per se in majority of these vials. And I'm going to be very careful with my wording. There may be some that contain the modified RNA, maybe not. What's a lot more important that the devil is in the nanotechnology, in the lipid nanoparticles that is the delivery system of the so-called modified RNA. Okay.

Is that the luciferase or whatever or something else? That's one of the enzymes that's present when you do a test. But the self-proclaimed inventor of the mRNA, if you look at his patent, which I read, I believe it was published in either 92 or 94. Who's this? This is Robert Malone. Okay. If you look at his patent...

of the lipid nanoparticle delivery system. That's basically a Trojan horse. That's what he patented. That's a Trojan horse that you can put anything inside of it. The coating of the lipid nanoparticle will fool the immune system to bring whatever the payload you want into the target cell. So LNP or lipid nanoparticles can be bringing in

heavy metals could be bringing in out, you know, extra silicone could be bringing in the modified RNA, but the devil, as far as toxicity is concerned is within the LNP itself. And that's what most people really need to understand that the LNP lipid nanoparticle.

that the lipid nanoparticle, the nanotechnology, is the evil here. Which is in the original 90 patent, 1990. It was about 90 or 92. I talk to Robert Malone frequently. Has he been presented, to your knowledge, has he been presented with this information? And what has his response been? I mean, let's just, like, just on the top level of that. Has he been presented?

So Karen Kingston has confronted with a lot of her writings because her sub stack is not behind the paywall. Everybody can read it. Robert Malone threatened her. There was quite a bit of commotion, um,

Robert Malone threatened her, threatened Karen Kingston. You're talking about like a legal threat? Yes, yes. Remember, he is the DARPA boy. He even admits that, that he's been with a lot of high intelligence ranked officers in his lifetime.

Robert Malone also sued Dr. Jane Ruby and Dr. Peter Bragan and Ginger Bragan for $25 million each, and that suit was thankfully thrown out by the judge as frivolous.

But he was essentially claiming defamation when all they were talking about is the presence of his patents, which are public knowledge, and the fact of whether or not he truly knew what was going on. His travel companion, if we want to go in a little bit off tangent, claimed that he never took the injection, which I don't find too difficult to believe. Well, he's been an outspoken critic of the product.

Well, he has been, but there is a nefarious agenda. In fact, if we want to go further in, when there was a discussion with Daniel Nagasi, who is the Canadian microbiologist doctor who lost his license during this whole COVID pandemic,

Dr. Nagasi basically was on a Zoom call with Dr. Malone, and he specifically asked him about the presence of the enzyme called reverse transcriptase, which allows the contents of whatever your payload is to hijack or be inserted into the subject, the DNA, for replication. And immediately as the word reverse transcriptase was used, Dr. Nagasi was silenced.

So they just, there are a lot of questions. What does that mean, silenced? He was basically told not to discuss this phenomenon because in my, by Malone. Is this a public conversation that's publicly made? There was, Dr. Nagasi has a sub-stack. I don't know if it's behind the paywall. I did read it. So yes, in fact. All of this is new to me, so I can't make an assessment of this publicly.

Either way, I'm allowing people to have an opinion and they have to do their own research. And that's what you encourage people to do too. I mean, it's unfortunate. Russians say unfortunate. We kind of have to stay on the topic of what I wanted to discuss. But this whole...

hoax and a shy up that occurred in the last five years has so many tentacles, and it's so nefarious. You're saying it's like a house of mirrors. There's multiple layers of the deception that the minute you start peeling that onion, more stuff comes out and more stuff comes out. In fact, I'll tell you, the majority of so called freedom movement,

A lot of them turned out to be grifters, too. There are people that are still true to the core. And I'm going to mention their names because I would like people to know those names. Because when you are seeking the truth, there are still some that cannot be bought that will never waver from where they stand. Those. Go ahead. I just want people. Yeah, I just want people to know that.

Some of this stuff that, you know, there's always going to be disputes and disagreements, and some of it doesn't have to be a conspiracy. A lot of it can just be, we talk on this show a lot about mimetic theory, and that's a more high-level anthropological framework, but the implication being that people can be really caught up in a hive mind group think about certain shibboleths or dogmas.

Yes, absolutely. That they take into a problem. And that doesn't mean they're conspiring with some nefarious meeting group, but they just believe in misguided information sometimes or incorrect dogmas that need more deconstruction and more suspicion and...

In other words, what I'm trying to suggest is that a lot of this stuff doesn't have to be just throw up our hands and say it's all this giant web of conspiracy, but rather dramatic groupthink and the blinders that come with that. That's just a part of that. That's very true. See, I used to believe that viruses existed because that was my training.

And I don't anymore. And I can substantiate it, but that's not for today's discussion because that's another whole topic and I don't want to skim through this. But since we were talking about subject of a few names to really pay attention to,

Dr. Paul Alexander has been true to himself, never wavered. Paul's a good friend of mine. Well, you should talk to him about Bobby Malone. I do all the time. Yeah, well. He is not a fan. I have found, let me tell you, like, look, I have, in every field that I go into, okay, whether it's the seed oil topic or it's the keto world or the carnivore world or the high sugar world or the paleo world or whatever,

physics world or the economics world or the libertarian world or all the different worlds I go into, every time I spend time in those communities, inevitably, I'm always running into these people who hate each other and say every nasty thing about it. So that doesn't mean to hand wave

all of the personal grievances away. I'm not doing that. I'm just saying for me, it's like, it comes with the territory, any niche topic that you get into, you're always going to find, well, that guy doesn't, you know, I've seen it a million times, you know, I, cause I like to, you know, bring people together to cross pollinate ideas. So when I bring people in the nutrition world, I could take someone within every little granular niche and find six vicious rivals

You agree on everything except ABCDEFGHI, but not, you know, the next letter. No, that's very true. So my point is to just say having that understanding, I don't, until I see the information that discredits someone completely, I don't like to pick sides about, you know,

you know this person you can't talk to that person or this person or that person so no it's and and that's true i mean you you have to have an open mind but from what i've been at this honestly since the inception i mean my first article on this whole psyop came in february 2020

before the whole lockdown garbage happened and before the world went crazy. So I've been at it for five years and I've changed a few of my

ideas as well. Right. And you wouldn't want someone to go back in time and accuse you of being a part of the conspiracy. Right. You were saying something that wasn't. Well, like, like I said, I used to, I used to talk about the gain of function of the virus. I no longer talk about it because it's the gain of fiction at this point. And there is a reason for it because it's a very easy thing. I may as well say this. It's a very easy thing to say, Oh, there's gain of function.

Virus did not escape from whatever, what market in China. It came from the lab in China. But all that couldn't be further away from the truth. You can see a lot closer association. It's actually United States, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, the lab of Ralph Baric. That's where it came from. It has nothing to do with China. I don't want to speak out out of turn, but I think Dr. Harvey Risch said that it came out of China.

That Chapel Hill lab. Did you hear from Arby Risch from Yale? Absolutely. A few times. I think he mentioned Chapel Hill. He's an epidemiologist. Yeah. So, and if we want to really connect the dots, we can find the parallels and development of bioweapons in the labs in Ukraine, former Soviet Union that were set up by none of the United States DOD. And there are,

There's numerous accounts of that. I mean, I know Tucker Carlson talked about it being accused of being conspiracy theories, but basically, if somebody wants to look up Luger, L-U-G-E-R, Act, they can see exactly where those labs, how they were taken up, how they were funded.

where hunter biden falls into play the company called metabiota so we don't need to look at china china i'm not saying i love what's happening in china god forbid no but we need to look a lot closer to home to what really started this whole psyop operation so but let's go back didn't dr artist say it was in the water too or something though well

That's what I'm saying. There's just a lot of different rabbit holes you can go. If you were, I'll tell you a couple other funny things. So when they tried to say that there is a test for this virus, uh,

And the test is called PCR, polymerase chain reaction, which was invented by Dr. Kerry Mollis, who mysteriously died in the summer of 2019. Yeah, in Los Angeles in the middle of the heat, supposedly died of pneumonia. Dr. Mollis has explicitly said several times on its own record, this test is amplification test. It's not a diagnostic test.

And in order for this test to pick up something, you need to give that something information. It's called a primer. So unless you tell this test to look for A, B, C, D, E, F, it's not going to find a miraculously novel virus.

And the sequence that they have been testing against, I may as well give you a little piece of information on that, has been discovered by Dr. LeMaird when she ran 16 commercially available PCR tests through the genetic program called BLAST, BLAST Technologies. When she ran the sequences from 16 different labs, she found that every single one of them was homo sapiens. In other words, they were testing us against us.

And the reason is very simple. We as humans are not all that unique. We are composed of about 3.4 billion base pairs of genetic sequences, nucleotides. To give you an idea, an onion has 11 billion base pairs. And the reason is very simple. An onion is completely self-sufficient versus we humans depend on a whole slew of things called microbiome. In fact,

The average number of bacterial and other cells outnumber us in the relation of 10 to 1. So, for instance, we share 60% of our genetic material with a banana.

So if let's say there is a sequence found in a banana and found in a human and found in a bird, it's not unique to a banana or human and a bird. It's cross-reacted. So that's why the whole idea of the PCR test is so fraudulent from the beginning. It's not a quantifiable test and there is no novel sequence. It was all coming from known sequences in human-based genome.

which may as well make a parallel. If you hear people saying, oh, I've been tested for bird flu or my chickens have been tested for bird flu using PCR tests, that's a non-starter. There's no such thing.

That's why it's a humongous hoax. Now, there is an agenda why it's there. We can talk about that later. But by itself, remember, PCR is non-diagnostic. And take it from the horse's mouth. The inventor himself, who had sparred with Fauci on numerous occasions, we can go back to AIDS epidemic, had said it numerous times. This test is not to diagnose any disease.

So we kind of took a little bit off tangent here, but I did want to get to the idea of, since we've talked about the necessity of everybody paying attention right now, not just those who took an injection, but those who stood up to medical tyranny, yet they're not out of the woods. And the phenomenon that I'm going to refer to is called shedding. Now,

If somebody told me this two, three, four years ago that I would have to be concerned about it, I would say, well, yes, I've actually experienced the symptoms of shedding because I was working with people who received injections in close proximity for two years. Did I experience certain problems? Yes. But I didn't think of why it's there and why it could propagate until I saw what I did with the work of Maria Chrysler, who works with the Global Healing Institute.

And essentially, the phenomenon of shedding was discussed in the article by the Korean and Japanese authors that we just referred to a few minutes ago, Lee and Brody. And the shedding is actually very simple to explain. Essentially, they incubated, they took skin particles from the person who received the injection and suffered seizures and brain damage.

And they incubated, basically put sterile saline on parts of the skin and see what happened. Nanobots came out a few days to a few weeks later. So essentially, we could manifest that if you take skin contact or saliva contact or any bodily fluids contact of a person who has not been injected to the one who has been injected,

There will be transfer and there will be incubation. And that's part of the reason why this NEN attack is now found in blood and urine of uninjected people. Maria Chrysler does a phenomenal job of showing this on NEN.

or microscopy slides. And I did attach a couple of them for the show notes for people to see that the hydrolyte substances and nanotech that I show is not from people who have been injected. It's from uninjected. So how do uninjected get it? Shedding is one, chemtrails is two,

Using produce coated with things like appeal and other garbage is three. The depletion of soils and the poisoning of our soils is four. And the worst of them all is what we call weaponized yeast. And that's the work of the Global Healing Group. So we all know that yeast is yeast. So basically, whatever we use to make breads, pastries, pasta,

So the weaponization of yeast goes back to the 90s. This is not new. But what happens is that you can make this fungus,

grow anything and anything, anything and everything that you will insert into it and then deliver it like a Trojan horse to the body or the human that you're trying to infect. So weaponization of yeast and introduction of nanotechnology into the uninjected is one of the ways why the uninjected

blood now shows the same way of red blood cells sticking together, nanotech found. So when I talk about whether or not there is a difference between injected and a non-injected, from the beginning, you could say everything is dose dependent, which is true. But moving forward, if the uninjected think that they're not infected,

potentially affected by this, they're absolutely wrong, which is why we're going to talk about mitigation strategies. And those are applicable to all of us. And is there a place where you can tell if you have that stuff in you? Well, you can take a live blood analysis and put your life, life, blood, life, life or live, live,

So I'll give you an example. I actually have a few clients that have seen the integrative practitioners at the LifeWorks Center in Clearwater. Very few practitioners, even in integrative medicine, do live blood analysis.

But if you take a little bit of blood, put it under the microscope, usually it's done with dark field for better visualization, you can actually see the effect of red blood cells clumped together. It's called Rouleau. It's like little rope type of formation. So yes, you can see it.

So the other way, which is what I have learned from studying the work of Maria Chrysler, she analyzed her own blood. She's uninjected. And she analyzed her own urine samples after treatment with certain agents, which I'm going to discuss in a few minutes, of how to mitigate the effects of that nanotank in uninjected people's blood. So, yes, you can see it if you're looking at it.

But very few clinics do the lifeblood analysis. It's not unheard of. Actually, one of the prominent researchers, doctors that does it exceptionally well is in South Africa. Her name is Zandre Botha.

And her work is phenomenal. There was also a group in Germany, La Quinta Columna did it in Spain. So yes, you can do it. But what do you what is the argument about what these nanobots are allegedly doing once they're in there? We're just running around and crashing into things or what?

Well, they definitely induce an immune response, which is why the autoimmune diseases are on the rise, as well as so-called turbo cancers. They interfere and damage the DNA. Because remember I mentioned how they are coded with these lipid nanoparticles or lipid layers to kind of evade the immune system from saying, I'm not self, destroy me. So think of it this way. Wherever the circulation goes in, which is part of the problem with the injected people,

whatever the weakest link in the body is already, that's what it's going to destroy. The turbo cancers we can talk about on a different show, the essence of what cancer is. But if you take it with a grain of salt that these injectables form synthetic biology, synthetic parasites, hydrogels, polymers, that's basically what those turbo cancers are spreading all over and setting up shop in different organs.

The other thing is the bigger agenda of it all, what those nanobots do. Well, this is where the transhumanism agenda comes into play. Because the idea is to have the, what we call the Internet of Things connection, the WBN, whole body Internet connection of all things,

So that's the idea of merging humans with non-human and controlling the hybrid, so to speak, or transhumans would be a lot easier, let's say, with the power of we talked about 5G, EMFs and so forth.

So that's the idea of moving towards transhumanism. And that's what is being very heavily emphasized, as uncomfortable as it may sound, when you listen to presentations of the Healing for the Ages. Ages is the acronym for Artists, Group, Ely, and Schmidt. Those are the four doctors that do the conferences as well as monthly masterclasses, educating the public and giving them solutions of what to do.

So that's the bigger picture. And unfortunately, the transhumanism is here to stay. Whether you like or you don't like AI is a different story. I personally feel that AI has no business in medicine, but that's my conviction. But we cannot pretend that it's not here. We have to figure out how to mitigate.

which brings me to the final analyses that I made after reading the article and also analyzing the work of...

the Maria Chrysler, as well as Wendy Roscoe. That's another researcher that works with the ages group. So once we figure out that we're all intoxicated with this synthetic and natural parasites and other nanobots that are bringing God knows what to the system, what are the solutions?

People used to say, well, I have to do a spike protein detox. Again, we already figured out, I don't know what you call spike protein. I call it synthetic toxin. So whether it comes from, if you still believe in viruses from a real thing or synthetic, if you understand that there is a strategy of boosting what your body can do to get rid of non-self,

then the whole disease whack-a-mole is no longer in play. It doesn't matter what they call it, disease X, C19, monkeypox, bird flu, it doesn't matter. Because if you understand that the mitigation detox strategies are basically the same for all of it, you already are two steps ahead of the game. So what are the solutions? The easiest one will start with freebies. Sweating on a daily basis.

Now, it's definitely better if you can implement the infrared sauna because of the cellular effects of the infrared energy. But even if you just show up, either it's a regular sauna or you dress up a little bit more warm when you go work out or just walk around so you induce the sweating, the sweating will over time help you detox these things too.

The other thing that I mentioned the word grounding is to try to utilize the Earth's energy flow and proper frequency to destroy the nanotech in your body by grounding. So that's the free thing. Now, the third free thing is fasting.

Fasting induces the process of what's called autophagy, which in Latin means self-eating. Actually, in Greek, my bad, means self-eating. So when you are fasting for a longer period of time, let's say two, three, four, five days, you will induce natural repair mechanism in your body to start getting rid of all sorts of toxins, synthetic and real.

Now, when we talk about the work that has been shown on live blood and live urine analysis of what breaks down this nanotech, well, I've got the solutions. Number one, terpenes or terpentines.

Now, a lot of people know them as being present in cannabinoids, in pine tree oil, in lemon oil, eucalyptus oil. But essential oils coming from nature have been shown to destroy hydrogel under the microscope. And that's the work of Maria Chrysler that I'm referencing right now.

The second thing that is very interesting is to remove the substrate, which are metals, for this hydrogel polymer to continue to assemble and reassemble. And people may have heard of the process called chelation. Essentially, it's grabbing like a claw of the crab, whatever the heavy metal in the body and pulling it out. And traditionally, chelation has been an IV therapy, not cheap by any means and requiring multiple visits.

Well, Global Healing Group has come out with a product of calcium disodium EDTA, which is a chelating agent that has been shown in vivo, live, to be effective at breaking down polymers and this nanotech. The other one, the element called selenium.

We used to call it birth control for viruses. Well, now I call it birth control for toxins. So selenium is extremely important in basically allowing your own body's mechanisms of immune activation to be there and help, let's say, production of certain enzymes in the body. One is myeloperoxidase to come into play and start breaking down this nanotech.

So we went through terpenes. The other one is enzymes in general, digestive enzymes, which is nowadays very, very important because let's just say the majority of us, unfortunately, don't have proper digestive functions with all the toxins around us. So supplementation with digestive enzymes and hydrochloric acid being part of them is extraordinarily important.

So I'm going to show the products here, not because I market them. I buy them myself from Global Healing Group. But basically, this is the same group that's with artists. Yes. Well, Dr. Art is part of the healing for the ages. Dr. Group has his own company called the Global Healing Institute. So this is Dr. Group's products. So this is my amazing trio that I've been using on myself and on my clients.

That consists of Paratrex, calcium disodium EDTA, and toxin binder. And the three of them work together to break down the adenotoxin and have it excrete, come out of the body.

Sweating, heating up the body, especially with infrared energy will help too. Oh, I forgot the other freebie that is available to hopefully most, sunlight exposure. And by sunlight, I mean, do not cover your body with sunscreen. Even 20 minutes a day of direct sunlight exposure will activate because 40% of the sun rays are infrared spectrum. That will activate cellular processes of both healing and destroying the nanotech.

In addition, there is another major player found in nature, and that's bee pollen. I have attached a slide that shows what bee pollen does in the presence of this synthetic parasites, the nanobots in the bloodstream, I believe. Bee pollen helps certain white blood cells called macrophages.

attack and share the information about what they're trying to destroy with others. So essentially forming channels of communication. That's what bee pollen does. And that's not expensive at all for most people to get.

The next thing to consider would be sulfageo frequencies. Now, this is a very interesting subject because it has been shown indeed that certain musical frequencies, certain notes will activate indeed, will raise the vibration of your cells, will change the energy flow, will tune you into the frequency of healing. So sulfageo frequencies, yes, they have been shown in vivo to break down nanotech. Hmm.

So to summarize, we've got fasting, direct sunlight, grounding, infrared sauna, terpenes, EDTA, you know, the tree of products that I showed by global healing. And overall, the sulfage frequencies, enzyme treatments, bee pollen. And overall, remember the idea, if you eat well, think well, and live well, those are

Cannot be under, under emphasis, overemphasized. Those are the pillars of pretty much most people trying to get into their better shape. Understand that there is a solution because this is not hopeless. It's a very, very unfortunate that millions have perished and millions got injured with these injections. But if you can try to come to part to, to terms with it,

and understand that you have the part in your personal healing journey to change that, I think we are closer and closer than we have been to the solution.

Mind you, these products that I showed today, they were not available three, four years ago. This is all the product of pretty much last four to six months of continuous research by Global Healing. So things are evolving. It doesn't mean that everybody has to get that to get relief from these things. It's just, well, it definitely could speed up for a lot of people. And, you know, the good news, these are not expensive. So the whole program,

that I just showed is probably in a neighborhood of 100, $120 for a month. So it's not completely out of reach, but I understand that not everybody's gonna be able to get it. The other thing I wanna emphasize is that,

Doing a program, let's say this active cleanse, detox, whatever you want to call it, you do it once and you think you're out of the woods. That's not the truth either because we're constantly being bombarded with toxins from everywhere. I mentioned chemtrails. I mentioned soil pollutions. I mentioned your food. Yes, I emphasize the necessity to eat organic, but I understand it's just less poisons, not no poisons.

So, and of course, clean water, because they know very well if humans don't have good sources of clean water, life is going to cease to exist too. So definitely think of it the way that a detox is part of daily living. It's not one and done. Sweating cannot be overemphasized. If I were to pick one favorite besides sun exposure, it will be daily sweating. Very good. And there's...

a lot of things out there that people can do to really take their whole life back into their hands. And, you know, I think that, you know, you want to talk about like narratives that are psyops that hold us back. I think entropy is a psyop. And I think, you know, that's one of the things that I've learned from the great Dr. Ray Peet, who was on my show many times before he passed,

as he talks about that, you know, one of the great delusions of the West, he's he believed that, you know, the West was run by a bunch of eugenicists, which is true, and that their dogmas about Darwinistic. Yes. Entropy are also a kind of lie mythology that they foisted upon the public to believe that

that the body is meant to break down in that kind of decay. But I think that Ray, now Ray, Dr. Pete was not an Orthodox, so to so-called like an Orthodox Christian, but he was saying things because he was looking at a lot of the scientists that were coming out of Russia during the Soviet Union that were censored here in the West and still are unknown.

And there's a lot of things that are congruent with my Christian worldview, which suggests that the body is actually meant to live forever, but it's all these stressors.

And that's the good news, right, that we're going to leave everybody with, at least from my perspective. And I think you're nodding along, which is that we don't have to say, oh, man, we were already born to decay. And now we've got all these more things added on. What hope is there? No, actually, the good news is your body is actually meant to eternally thrive.

theoretically, you know, be able to live abundantly throughout much longer than the normal lifestyle that an age that we've accepted as natural.

So there's a lot of work to be done for positive, not just defeatism. Like, oh man, I was already going to deal with the decay that everybody had. And now we've got all these crazy nanobots and things like that. We don't even, we're just barely going to make it. No, that's not the right outlook. Well, as, as I've been preaching for on, on your podcast, many times, the body is meant to be healthy.

The body means to heal itself. We just need to remove the noise that prevents it from doing so. The nanotechnology is there to stay. I didn't even give references, but basically it goes back to 90s when the nanos were used in whatever medical application and control application. So it's here to stay, but you don't have to be afraid of it because if you understand that nanos

If you eat well, think well, live well, and put your body in a balance with nature.

and nurture the fact that you can heal by taking certain hints and certain things, doesn't have to be material, to spiritual wellness is absolutely crucial, which is part of the reason why I'm sure you would agree when they wanted to dampen everything down and bring down the spirits. They closed the churches, they closed the schools, they closed all places of worship. Liquor stores were open, strip clubs were open, Home Depot was open.

So there is an agenda of really breaking up the spiritual connection of the humans. And I didn't even say this, but

We all know that we emit frequencies and we have electromagnetic field around us. Our heart has a six feet electromagnetic field. Does that ring a bell about six feet apart? Yeah. It's evil. It's absolutely nefarious evil. Your brain does not emit the same electromagnetic field. It's about two feet. So if we...

definitely find the spirituality and positive thinking that you're

This is not to, you know, bring you down with all this information that we've discussed today. It's to show you that despite all that, you've got solutions. But my message to people is that don't believe that your allopathic medical doctor, it's not my term, but I like it, is going to bring you solutions here. Not at all. In fact, they are likely that need to be saved. And a lot of them, if they only listen, will learn from you.

But if you understand that you are in control of your destiny and you have the power within your spirit, within your heart to heal yourself and spread it. Remember, we are all connected to the source, to God, all of us. So if one person makes a positive decision and it positively affects the community around them, we all heal. Mm-hmm.

I mean, in 2018, I was the only one talking about seed oils in a major market broadcast news setting. There was obviously podcasts that had been talking about seed oils for a long time, but they were relegated to preaching within the niche of the converted, preaching to the choir.

And I was the only guy out there hitting that every day, the dangers of toxic seed oil sludge as the host of a major market FM and AM program that had a national following.

And, you know, at the time that I did that and I was talking about the topic even earlier on my podcast, but we started the show in 2018 on FM and AM. And again, nobody knew what a seed oil was back then. And still a lot of people don't know. But but now steak and shake and all these people are removing seed oils and making a lot of money.

responding, which shows you how quickly things can change so rapidly. And so we just have to be confident and get the information out there, the truth out there. And look, my goal when you're trying to lead things is that you have to learn how to work with as many people in the broadest tent as possible.

And I will work with people who are even sinners like me and even people who are deluded and maybe even in power that could be deluded because you can take like in the Bible, you have King Nebuchadnezzar and all their other kings who were wicked, who end up doing good things. So I always take that as my assumption. Now, obviously, you have to be wise as a serpent and gentle as a dove.

As the master of history, Jesus said, in the way you conduct your discernment. But at the same time, that means you have to work with whoever comes into your life. And if I have an audience with someone who is considered to be this way or that way, or if an audience with somebody else who doesn't like that one, this one thinks that one's a kook, this one thinks that one's an agent, this one thinks that. We can journey together and the journey of the truth will get people to the right place.

And somebody may have a, B and C wrong, but they've got D right. And somebody may have a and B wrong, but they've got C, D and E right. And you just got to let the tapestry of the human story unfold, you know, and that's, that's how it works. So,

You know, like I think I know that this is another one, but I think I think the hatred of sugar is another psyop. But that's for another time. But there's so much that people there's so much that people are, you know, they get angry about, you know, these these assumptions that, you know, this is not this is reality because people's whole whole sense of.

identity gets wrapped around what they believe, right? You nailed it. It's the identity. Exactly. They identify a certain way and becomes a dogma. Yes. So when I hear what you're saying, you know, one side of the, you know, a large swath of even the COVID criticism community would say, oh man,

David, Dr. Carey, she's going off into the fringes. But then other side would say, no, she's on the pioneer of the revolution against the truth. And some of those others that would say she's fringe are exactly what's wrong with the movement or whatever. And that's what human adults have to do. They have to have discernment with their spirit, their magnetic field, their intuition, the right brain, and let that be their guide. Because ultimately, we cannot know

infinite knowledge. We can only go, like you said, a journey. You've had things that you thought and then you update your information along the way. Yes. And all the things, I'm not sure about all the ingredients that you mentioned in those products, but everything that I heard, because I didn't know all the names that you listed, but everything that I heard sounded like generally, you know, things that people would have healthy benefit from, whether what your reference to the Korean study is correct or not.

Like, does that make sense? Yeah. It's not like if this is true, you, this is why you would take it. Yes. Like, no, even if that wasn't true. And even if it's not nano, even if it's gain of function and even if it's spike protein and even if it's viruses exist, like all of these things directionally still go in the right direction is what I'm trying to get at. That's absolutely true. And the solutions that I am,

talking about based on what I have seen, what I have learned, and I'm continuing to learn. I'm actually part of the Healing for the Ages. I belong to their masterclasses because it's absolutely astonishing the amount of information that comes out every month, something new.

So the good news is that all of these solutions, these are not pharma. This all comes from nature. I mean, turpentines, I mean, they've been used for thousands of years. So this is nothing new. One product was calcium, was it? So, no, it's called calcium disodium EDTA. EDTA is a chelating agent, something that grabs onto metals and polymers and pulls them out.

Toxin binder is basically a concoction of zeolite, activated charcoal, fulvic acid, humic acid. So all of these are natural compounds. What do you think about hydrogen tablets?

So hydrogen tablets is not exactly a detox. It's more like food for mitochondria to boost like somebody has brain fog. You can call it an interim solution, basically. When you are healthy, like I experimented on myself, hydrogen tablets don't do much to me.

I already have a bundle of energy throughout the day. I don't have anything that I'm suffering from. However, if you're under the weather and you're feeling fatigue, because one thing that we haven't really mentioned much, but all disease,

is a theft of electrons. Unfortunately, physics trumps biochemistry here. It directs biochemical reactions. So if you understand that, that it doesn't matter what the name of the disease is, you are feeling like you're feeling exhausted, you're feeling fatigued, you don't have energy. You truly don't have energy because your electrons have been stolen.

So the harvest of electrons or theft of electrons is what hydrogen drinks, hydrogen water is basically trying to combat is bring back the energy for your mitochondria to function. But as far as the

part of, you know, breaking up and removing, you know, all these bad solutions from you. No, it's not going to do that, but it's still beneficial for those that are suffering from, like I said, fatigue, brain fog to get better. If you get a cold and you want to get better and feel better, hydrogen water would help. Another one is the benefits of CO2, which I've been exploring. Oh, yes. Looks like Dr. Ray Peet was one of the ones that pioneered this for

audiences in my circle but also uh folks like steve scott at carbo genetics who's developed uh several different ways to get co2 through inhalation or through the body suit that he's developed where you get 100 co2 absorbed through the skin and it's just tremendous i mean i've only just uh

just gotten started with trying some of these different modalities and it's a big, you can just see a lot of health, holistic health improvements taking place. Absolutely. And it's like infrared light saunas. I think these things are going to be really stacked together. And, uh,

People are going to be healthier than ever before if we can get through the rocky period of lies and disinformation and groupthink and so forth. So I appreciate your time. Thank you for coming on again. Do you have an email or anything you'd like to share, a website or anything? So my email, if people want to get in touch with me, if they...

Definitely, I encourage them to look through the stack of slides that will attach to the show notes. But my email is always the best way to reach me. It's drcaryb at gmail.com.

And as far as getting the information that I brought up here, I'm going to mention two more resources because they are important. One is the Healing for the Ages. If you go to that website, healingfortheages.com, a lot of the masterclasses, a lot of the information that I bring up will be there. Now, granted, it is behind the paywall for some of the content, but

I think it's $29 a month that people really want to get through. But I am going to direct the last but not least attention to Dr. Lee Merritt's Rumble channel, which is called TheMedicalRebel.com because she just put out

three parts of five, I believe, on the whole expose why viruses don't exist and how the whole disease guacamole model has to stop. And that's not behind the paywall. I think it's very well put together, not super technical. So I do encourage people for more information on a lot of truth to go to her website, TheMedicalRebel.com or to her Rumble channel, The Medical Rebel, and watch some of her videos. You won't be disappointed.

All right. Thank you, Carrie. I appreciate you coming on. Thanks again. My pleasure. Have a wonderful day.