We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Immediate and 12 months follow up of function and lead integrity after cranial MRI in 356 patients with conventional cardiac pacemakers

Immediate and 12 months follow up of function and lead integrity after cranial MRI in 356 patients with conventional cardiac pacemakers

2014/1/1
logo of podcast Medizin - Open Access LMU - Teil 21/22

Medizin - Open Access LMU - Teil 21/22

Shownotes Transcript

Background: Conventional cardiac pacemakers are still often regarded as a contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We conducted this study to support the hypothesis that it is safe to scan patients with cardiac pacemakers in a 1.5 Tesla MRI, if close supervision and monitoring as well as adequate pre- and postscan programming is provided. Methods: We followed up 356 patients (age 61.3 +/- 9.1 yrs., 229 men) with single (n = 132) or dual chamber (n = 224) cardiac pacemakers and urgent indication for a cranial MRI for 12 months. The scans were performed at 1.5T. During the scan patients were monitored with a 3-lead ECG and pulse oximetry. Prior to the scan pacemakers were programmed according to our own protocol. Results: All 356 scans were completed without complications. No arrhythmias were induced, programmed parameters remained unchanged. No pacemaker dysfunction was identified. Follow-up examinations were performed immediately, 2 weeks, 2, 6, and 12 months after the scan. There was no significant change of pacing capture threshold (ventricular 0.9 +/- 0.4 [email protected] ms, atrial 0.9 +/- 0.3 [email protected] ms) immediately (ventricular 1.0 +/- 0.3 [email protected] ms, atrial 0.9 +/- 0.4 [email protected] ms) or at 12 months follow-up examinations (ventricular 0.9 +/- 0.2 [email protected] ms, atrial 0.9 +/- 0.3 [email protected] ms). There was no significant change in sensing threshold (8.0 +/- 4.0 mV vs. 8.1 +/- 4.2 mV ventricular lead, 2.0 +/- 0.9 mV vs. 2.1 +/- 1.0 mV atrial lead) or lead impedance (ventricular 584 +/- 179 O vs. 578 +/- 188 O, atrial 534 +/- 176 O vs. 532 +/- 169 O) after 12 months. Conclusions: This supports the evidence that patients with conventional pacemakers can safely undergo cranial MRI in a 1.5T system with suitable preparation, supervision and precautions. Long term follow-up did not reveal significant changes in pacing capture nor sensing threshold.