We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode China Fights Tariffs with Tariffs

China Fights Tariffs with Tariffs

2025/2/4
logo of podcast Bloomberg Technology

Bloomberg Technology

AI Chapters Transcript

Shownotes Transcript

Open Source AI is available to all, not just the few. Meta's Open Source is free to use, enabling startups like Nanome to innovate. Here's CEO Steve McCloskey. With Meta's free Open Source AI model, Lama, we built an AI tool that allows us to collaborate with other scientists to discover treatments for diseases. Learn how others are building with Meta's free Open Source AI at ai.meta.com. Open.

Feeling buried in a never-ending to-do list that comes with running a business, managing orders, tracking expenses, it's a lot.

That's where Amazon Business steps in. They've got smart buying solutions like Spend Visibility, a cloud-based system to track your buying patterns so you can optimize your savings, and Bulk Buying, so you can continue to save costs on select products with quantity discounts. Smart, right? Let Amazon Business take care of the admin so you can focus on what really matters, growing your business. Check out Smart Business Buying at AmazonBusiness.com. A Business Prime membership is required to access Spend Visibility.

From the heart of where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond, this is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow. Live from New York, I'm Caroline Hyde.

And I'm Jackie Duvall from San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up, China retaliates with its own tariffs on the United States, including a probe into Google. Plus, Palantir soars to a new record as earnings show untamed growth for its AI software. And Spotify shares also surge to a record after its first annual profit. And we start there with a markets check amid all the record highs in earnings.

Let's get to it with the Nasdaq currently making up for yesterday's sell-off, Jackie. We're currently up more than a percentage point at the moment. And in terms of points contributors, it's all about Palantir. Move on and have a look at what the fundamentals of certain businesses are doing to this index. Palantir up 26%, a new record high. This is we see untamed organic growth when it comes to AI. They win on commercial, they win on government. We'll get to it later in the show. Spotify also had a new record up almost 10%.

as they add to their growing monthly active users and also the first profit ever in terms of an annual profit. They're going to continue that alphabet up to a half percent. Look, they're coming with their earnings after the bell. All eyes on 13% increase in revenue. We'll get to the earnings in a bit. But this is also an antitrust investigation story from China. This is we see China retaliate to the tariff crisis.

potential coming from the United States. We anticipate a call between Xi Jinping and Trump coming soon. But let's delve into the tech implications. Bloomberg's Mike Sheppard is with us in Washington. And look, from a search perspective, Google's not there in China, but Android is.

Android is. And, Caro, you have to think of this also in terms of symbolism as well. Xi Jinping is trying to send a signal to Washington that, hey, I can retaliate too and try to make it hurt by targeting individual companies.

So by going after Google with this antitrust probe, look, the search is not really a factor in China where it really hasn't been operating since 2010. But the company does have some advertising sales and engineering work done there. It does have three offices in three different Chinese cities. So it's not a zero factor. But it is a signal that other U.S. entities, perhaps Apple and perhaps Intel, we saw the Financial Times reporting that

officials in Beijing were weighing whether to conduct a fuller probe of Intel as well. And also, as you and I have talked about before, there is the NVIDIA antitrust probe being conducted by officials in Beijing. And this is over that long ago acquisition by NVIDIA of Mellanox. So they are trying to send a signal with this Google antitrust probe as much as anything else.

Mike, as you mentioned, there's also an NVIDIA probe. So this isn't the first time that Xi Jinping is using a probe like this to retaliate. In the past, have you seen it be an effective negotiating tool?

Well, we're going to find out now whether it works in real time with Donald Trump, because under the Biden administration, it was one equation. But under Donald Trump, it's a very different one. And he may not be looking at this as such a dangerous signal.

Even after having met with Jensen Huang last week, it may not be as big a concern. Really, what we're looking for is the broader negotiation that is going to happen in April. This is really just sort of the opening round in the conversation between China and the U.S. on trade.

The president has ordered, the U.S. president has ordered a review of the phase one trade agreement that he forged at the end of his first term. And we're going to hear more about that in April. So this is just sort of the warm-up act to a bigger conversation. And remember, Donald Trump has talked about imposing

tariffs of up to 60 percent, additional tariffs of up to 60 percent on Chinese goods. And that would really hurt Beijing, which is focusing on its exports to the rest of the world as a way of reviving its domestic economy. Bloomberg's Mike Shepard. Thank you.

And as Alphabet faces a Chinese probe, the company is set to report results today after the closing bell. For what we can expect, Bloomberg's Ryan Vestelica joins us now. Ryan, when it comes to Google, there's cloud search and artificial intelligence as of late. What's top of mind for investors going into this report?

Good afternoon. I would say that probably the cloud business is probably what people are most curious about right now. We did get Microsoft results last week. They were sort of a mixed bag. They were growing a little bit slower than expected, but that's partially due to some supply constraints. So, you know, cloud has become increasingly important to Alphabet, and I think people are curious to see what growth looks like there. We also got meta results last week, which painted a pretty good picture of the market for online advertising. So it seems kind of safe to assume that a Google search will be at least pretty strong as well.

Any response to DeepSeek mentioned, do you think, Ryan? I'm sure they'll address it. It's sort of an interesting position with respect to DeepSeek. If they do find a way to make their own AI model more efficient, more cost-effective, that's probably going to be great for the stock. It's probably going to be something that's cheered on Wall Street. But it seems like so far, while it did see a little bit of volatility last week when the big sell-off happened and impacted everyone in tech, it's really come back strongly since then. It's trading at a record right now. It's been able to

brush off a lot of issues that you think would take down a stock like this, not only the regulatory and antitrust stuff out of China, but also here in the United States.

I like that you note that shares are at a record high. Ryan Blastellica, we thank you. You've got AMD after the bell as well. There's a lot to get to. And for more market perspective, let's bring in Fiona Sincottage, a senior analyst at Citi Index Financial Markets. Let's just stick with earnings for a moment because we've got record highs abound on the back of certain earnings today. And we look towards Alphabet and AMD. What are you looking to in terms of generative AI still being a winning formula for these companies or not?

I think we have a technical issue there. We're just going to bring her volumes up a little bit more for you. So we spend just a moment just anticipating what Fiona is going to be delving into in terms of

generative AI, the focus on Alphabet, whether or not AMD can steal any of the market share from Nvidia in terms of its offering to data centers and servers. And Jackie, I think we can also be anticipating what all of the trade tariffs and geopolitical anxiety is currently having on the markets. Let's go back to Fiona now. I think we fixed your technical issues, Fiona. Just talk about earnings and fundamentals first.

Yes, that's right. You know, I think AI is still going to be very much and it is still very much a focus as far as earnings are concerned. You know, we know that the investors are still looking to see whether these huge investments that we've seen are going to be bringing returns, are going to be bringing in new revenue streams and stronger revenue streams. And that, I think, is what's sort of helping to keep investors

these stocks at these record levels. There is still a lot of optimism surrounding what AI can do for these stocks. And, you know, the prospect of potentially those costs coming down in the future, again, I think that's a positive as far as users of AI can be concerned.

Fiona, I'm curious if there's a divergence between some of the software names and hardware names, especially as we're seeing geopolitical tensions play out in the form of tariffs that could take a bigger hit to chip makers, for example.

Yes, you know, it's a really good point. And we have been noticing that. And I think that's something that's going to be very much forefront as we get through these earnings as well is, you know, what is the outlook as far as some of those chip stocks are concerned? What is the prospect of exports and tariffs being placed on them, export limitations, which could make the outlook for those chip stocks a little bit more complicated than

Whereas the sort of more software firms, I think they have the potential to have a little bit more freedom as far as their outlook is concerned and potentially could benefit from the outlook even as we see trade tariffs discussions in the market. One of the things I'm curious about is in this new administration, many think that it's going to be pretty friendly when it comes to the Federal Trade Commission. What do you think that bodes for technology?

Yeah, you know, if we do have a sense that there's sort of reduced regulation, we know that that could be really beneficial for technology. And I think it's a really interesting idea, especially when we're considering, you know, what regulation there might have been with regards to big tech, what regulation there could be. Wouldn't

With regards to this idea of AI as well, I think that's still very much an open subject of where regulation may have been. But the fact that we could be looking at a future, at least for the next few years, of decreased regulation is definitely a positive for many stocks in the tech area, but also could be outside of the tech area as well. What are the names, Fiona, that you've been fielding the most calls on?

That's a good one. I think obviously Nvidia has been hugely in focus because of those levels of volatility that we've had. We've also seen Tesla has always been very popular among

our clients as well. But heading towards this week, Amazon and Alphabet are the names that have been up there with our clients. We do see this big focus on the Magnificent Seven and their ability to be able to sort of continue impressing the market with their numbers. And how do you think

the investor base has come out in terms of yes, please spend all costs. This is a rush. This is a war. On the other side, hold on. Do we need this sort of level of data center investment right now? Where are they falling as to that sort of ultimate dichotomy we see faced in the market?

Yeah, I think, you know, when we did see that sort of release last week from DeepSeek, that did just sort of raise questions of disruption and raise those questions over the amount of spending, which had been lingering anyway. But I think at the moment so far and what we've seen from earnings season so far, from the calls that we've listened to, it does seem to be that sense that, OK, for now, this still seems like an idea that spending in IEA

investing in AI is still the way to go. There's still plenty of opportunity out there. I still think we're very much at the cusp of understanding what this AI revolution could mean for these stocks. So I think at the moment, we're just still on that side. I think what the concern would be is actually when we get a little bit further down the line and we're not seeing a return on those investments, that's when we're going to start potentially to see this unraveling. But up to now, that hasn't been the case.

Fiona, I'm curious, but now that you mentioned kind of perhaps companies getting a bit more leeway, especially as you have President Trump really amping up this idea of the AI race, national competitiveness, how long do you think investors will give companies to see whether those investments are actually panning out?

Yeah, that's a really good question, because I think this the whole sort of what we've seen over the last couple of weeks, the last week in particular with this deep seek unveiling is sort of that question of innovation. Is that question of, you know, what's next? How far can this go? And so, you know, investors are curious.

They are optimistic, but they're not going to have an everlasting patience. Obviously, we've seen from Meta, I mean, they were a good example to use from last week's earnings where we've seen some really encouraging outlook and numbers. And then obviously we've seen Microsoft wasn't so well received. So there is sort of this sense that the investors do want to see Meta

some optimism into the future. But I do think that as we head towards the middle and the end of 2025, then I think that's when we're going to really need to start to see these numbers coming in through into stronger revenue streams still and profit margins. Fiona Sincotta, Senior Analyst of Citi Index Financial Markets. Thank you. Coming up, shares of Spotify and Palantir surge to new records on strong earnings. More on that next. This is Bloomberg.

I'm Alpine skier, Michaela Schifrin. I've won the most World Cup ski races in history. But what does success mean to me? Success means discipline. It's teamwork. It's the drive and passion inside of us that comes before all recognition. And it's why Stiefel is one of the fastest growing global wealth management firms in the country. If you're looking for success, surround yourself with the people who will get you there. It's

At Stiefel, we invest everything into our advisors so they can invest everything into their clients. That means direct access to one of the industry's largest equity research franchises and a leading middle market investment bank. And it's why Stiefel has won the J.D. Power Award for Employee Advisor Satisfaction two years in a row.

If you're an advisor or investor, choose Stiefel. Where success meets success. Stiefel Nicholas & Company, Inc., member SIPC and NYSE. For J.D. Power 2024 award information, visit jdpower.com slash awards. Compensation provided for using, not obtaining the award. The average time to hire for most organizations is 30 to 45 days. Are you tired of a costly and lengthy hiring process? Simplify and speed up your recruitment by using the experts at Express Employment Professionals.

Reduce time to hire, cut down on multiple interviews, and lower your recruitment costs. Whether you're looking for contract workers or a new team member, our streamlined recruiting, candidate screening, and hiring process is more efficient than hiring on your own. Visit ExpressPros.com today. Haven't used a staffing company before? We know you enjoy learning new things and keeping up with trends and efficiencies.

Make a change this year with your hiring. Businesses are navigating a hiring landscape that has never been more expensive or regulated. Start at ExpressPros.com to find the location near you. With more than 860 locally owned offices, you'll get the hiring support you need at ExpressPros.com.

Shares of Spotify jumping to a new record as the music streaming company posted another quarter better than expected subscriber growth and its first ever annual profit. For more, Bloomberg's Ashley Carman joins us now. And more than a billion delivered in terms of euros. They're managing to control costs and grow.

Yes, last year was really a story of, unfortunately, lots of layoffs at Spotify. They really cut back on their podcast spending. And then this year, so I guess actually 2024, that was 2023, 2024 was the year of new products really doubling down on these video creators. They say now they're going to be focusing more on the music business. So they've definitely turned a corner.

Ashley, I'm a huge fan of audiobooks and historically this has kind of been a drag on margins for Spotify. What did the company say about its growth prospects in this particular segment?

So really, podcasts were what investors were really worried about when it came to their margins. So they introduced audiobooks back in 2023. And so far, I mean, the company is basically positioning it as they have this profit now. They had their full year of profit. They're able to reinvest in audiobooks.

new verticals like audiobooks, like these video creators. They did say on their earnings call today that there's going to be a little bit of variability when it comes to their gross margin moving forward. But again, I think they're sort of couching it as, well, we showed you guys we can do really well. We do need to start innovating again and really putting out new products. Bloomberg's Ashley Carman. Thank you.

Another earnings story, Palantir stock surging to a record after it posted a full year revenue forecast that exceeded analyst estimates, driven by a, quote, untamed AI demand. CEO Alex Karp said this on yesterday's earnings call. We are at the way beginning of our trajectory. We are at the way beginning of a revolution. And we plan to be a cornerstone, if not the cornerstone company in driving this revolution in the U.S. over the next three to five years.

For more on Palantir, Gil Lurie, a managing partner at DA Davidson, joins us now. He has a neutral rating on the stock with a price target of $105. Gil, Alex Karp called this a revolution. He made clear that the company is poised to benefit as global conflict rises, especially with China. But they also touted its commercial business on its call and in its letter. What do you make of that segment? And are you confident in its growth prospects?

Yeah, the commercial segment is doing phenomenally well because Palantir is addressing the need in the market. There's a deep need in the market for implementing AI solutions that can add insight and decision-making support.

And Palantir has a combination of an existing set of products that they've developed over the years, as well as a very strong professional services group that can help companies implement AI solutions quickly. They're uniquely positioned to do that, and they're really riding the AI wave right now. So does that vindicate a price-to-earnings ratio, a price versus future earnings that is currently trading at almost 200 times? This is a phenomenal valuation. Yes.

Yes, it is. It's orders of magnitude higher than comparable companies. But the reality is that right now there is no comparable company. Palantir is the only company at this size that is not only going to grow more than 30%, it's doing so as it accelerates growth. The rest of the software complex has seen decelerating growth, and very few companies at this size can even approach 30%.

Let's just talk about that growth, though, because if you go back to 2022 and we heard from William Blair analysts talking about this, he made a commitment to bringing in about four and a half billion in terms of revenue. So actually, he's undershot that. Are you worried about the undershooting of a three year target here? Not right now, because, again, on the commercial side, they have a tremendous amount of momentum with enterprise customers that want AI solutions to quickly go

going to Palantir to do that. And then on the government side, they're having great success with Department of Defense, which is likely to continue under this administration, given the focus on digital, given the focus, the proximity of people in Palantir to this administration. And then they also have really big wins, like in the UK, National Health Services. That drove a

lot of the growth this quarter as well. So they're hitting on all cylinders right now. They have a ramp to continue to grow at these rates, even if they didn't reach some of those ambitious goals they've set in the past. Potentially one of those ramps could be Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, which came up on last night's call. I'm curious if that is factoring into how you're thinking about the stock.

It does, because the government is running a lot of outdated software that was developed sometimes in the '80s or '90s with code that can only be maintained by people that are retiring. There's a huge need to update all the software code in the government, and again, especially in units of the Department of Defense. And this is what Palantir has been focused on for more than 20 years.

So with a little bit more of a sense of urgency from the government, Palantir is very well positioned to get a lot more of that business. Again, extending the ramp in the government sector where previously maybe they were still fighting for turf, now they have a much more straight line towards getting that progress. But international growth, Gil, that's going to be hit if we do see geopolitical tensions. And they are seeming...

to lose that sort of growth trajectory in an international sales perspective.

That's right. Outside of the US and the UK, they're having challenges in Europe. And part of it is the political identity. This company is a mission-driven company. They state very clearly that they're there to defend Western civilization, and especially the United States, and putting America first, which again fits very well with this administration in the US. But in Europe, that rubs some people the wrong way.

They don't necessarily see that mission as a reason to buy software, and that's where Palantir's not doing as well.

Now, there are some political landscape shifts in Europe, and we'll see how those play out. I'm getting real-time messages from hedge fund telemetry, for example, really questioning the market capitalization here, Gil. You talked about why it's vindicated, its unique offering. But just tell us about your price point, because it's actually where the price is currently for the stock. Would you upgrade it?

We prefer other companies that have similar growth trajectories and similar ramps. Specifically in this case, Snowflake and Datadog will also ride the AI wave in their own way, and they're trading at a fraction of the multiple. So if Palantir is trading at 70 times revenue and 170 times cash flow, Snowflake and Datadog are trading more like

15 times revenue and 50 times cash flow, which are much more palatable valuations. And that's why those are our buy ratings in this sector. Gil Luria, it's great to catch up with you. Thank you, DA Davidson.

It's time now for Talking Tech. First up, Salesforce cutting jobs at its latest fiscal year gets underway, according to a source who says, in fact, more than 1,000 roles will be affected. This comes even as the company is simultaneously hiring workers to sell new AI products. Plus, Grab, check out the shares, jumping on the back of the news that it is weighing a takeover of rival GoTo at a valuation of more than $7 billion. The firms are the two biggest ride-hailing providers in Southeast Asia and have held on and off talks for years.

And shares of German chipmaker Infineon also surging, this time the most in nine months after the company's forecast revenue beat analyst expectations. A bright spot in an industry that's been grappling with long-standing slump. A situation which would not be held, though, by tariffs, says the company's CFO.

A major escalation of the tariffs is not included in our guidance because we still are not giving up in advocating for free trade. We do not see that as positive for the industry. So an escalation of tariffs and counter tariffs would be negative. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Caroline Hyde in New York.

And I'm Jackie Davalos in San Francisco. Quick check on these markets, Jackie, because we're making up for yesterday's sell-off. We're up more than 1.3% on the NASDAQ. Big points contribution coming from the likes of NVIDIA, from Alphabet that has numbers after the bell, but also from Palantir that had its numbers after the bell yesterday. Boy, we are riding high. We are a new record high. Let's move it on to Palantir that currently jumps 26%. The valuation is absolutely extraordinary on this software stop, as we're hearing from key DA Davidson analysts saying, look,

Look, ultimately, this is a unique story in software, and they continue to outperform. We've got government contracts, we've got commercial contracts. It's all about the U.S. in this age of geopolitical risk. But, Jackie, we're looking at plenty more.

Elon Musk's government takeover has been swift and chaotic. Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner writes in today's tech newsletter that just in two short weeks, Musk has become a bit of a human wrecking ball in Washington. He joins us now for more. Kurt, you write that this isn't a movie that we haven't seen before. Could you walk us through perhaps the differences between how Elon Musk is running Doge right now versus his previous takeover of Twitter?

Yeah, well, the number of similarities is going to be a lot longer, I think, than the number of differences. I think anybody familiar with that Twitter takeover is seeing a very familiar playbook

play out right here, right? It's showing up, cutting off access for people, offering buyouts with literally the same language in the email that he's giving people, kind of bullying his way into these systems, right? And anybody who tries to get in his way is suddenly showing up on leave. And in Twitter's case, it was being fired. And so I think the biggest difference here and what I wanted to really hammer home in this morning's tech newsletter is

is that you know which what are you doing this with a privately held company that that he bought with private money right this is the US government this is the ramifications of what he's doing to cut the government is going to affect all of us as citizens here and it doesn't necessarily strike me as well that the

the tactics are the same, the stakes are much higher here, I think. They are, but some people like it. Look, Palantir, the CTO, was on the call saying that Palantir's real competition is a lack of accountability. And in fact, they think Doge is going to bring meritocracy. It's going to bring transparency to government. So even though it is this sort of wrecking ball, could it have positive impacts for companies here?

Yeah, so I think in much the same way he succeeded in cutting costs at Twitter, I have no doubt that he will cut costs at the U.S. government and find things that, quite frankly, all of us would be scratching our heads saying, wait, we were paying for what? We were spending X number of millions on what, right? I have no doubt that those things exist and that they will –

hopefully be uncovered. But I also think that there are probably a lot more thoughtful ways to go about doing this. I think the thing we know from Elon over covering him for years and watching him with all his companies is he tends to not worry about the collateral damage, right? He just simply says,

the goal is to cut costs we'll do whatever it takes to get there and you know everything else that happens as a side effect so be it well those side effects I think at a at a national scale could just be really significant and so for me I would prefer to see someone who's you know maybe moving a little slower on at you know to try and make sure that we don't have any of these downstream effects that we've seen at some of his companies when he moves this quickly

- Kurt Wagner, thanks so much. And do check out, of course, the tech in-depth newsletter from Bloomberg's journalists around the world. You can subscribe on Bloomberg.com/newsletters. But let's keep this conversation going when it comes to Doge. Jennifer Palka is with us, senior fellow at the Nishkinen Center and former President Barack Obama's deputy chief technology officer. And interestingly, you just recently co-authored a report providing perhaps a roadmap for improving government performance, structural, cultural challenges,

Do you in any way see the positives of this doge drive, Jennifer? I think I hoped to see positives. I've been a big advocate for real significant renovation of government for a long time. And as Kurt said, I've been hoping that it would move faster. I think unfortunately what we're seeing is moving far too fast and not with the right intent.

So if you want to renovate government, that's sort of like pulling it back down to the studs. What we're seeing now is really pulling up the core foundations of our government, the principles on which it was established, and that is not going to increase state capacity, which is what our report is about. State capacity is just the ability of government to achieve its policy goals. We have incredibly important challenges that we need to face as a government. We need a stronger state, not a destroyed state.

Jennifer, you've talked about how government and perhaps some political parties more than others have focused too much on process, not outcomes. How in a perfect world could you see perhaps Doge playing a role in advancing technology, really helping government perform better?

We certainly do need more focus on outcomes over process. We don't need no process. And what's happening right now is not just looking deeply at what processes could be simplified, but actually not respecting the law.

And what I had hoped Doge would do is go in and say, OK, these things can be cleaned up. Oh, and by the way, some of these laws are holding us back. Let's go to Congress and have them fixed so that we can operate in a more streamlined and outcomes-oriented way. Instead, they're just sort of rolling roughshod over the law, which is, again, sort of the principle of our government and very dangerous.

I mean, if you were to give lawmakers perhaps some advice on how to clean some of this up, how to regain some of the trust and credibility that perhaps Doge can bring, what advice would you bring them?

Well, we have four major pillars that we think need to happen, and they should happen regardless of Doge. I think we're in a very chaotic moment, but there will be moments when we can look back at this agenda. We essentially say four things. If you want a government that can do what it says it's going to do, you need to be able to hire the right people and fire the wrong ones. You need to reduce the procedural bloat. You need to invest in digital and data infrastructure in smart ways, not just cutting people off, but actually building what does work.

And lastly, we need to close the loop, the feedback loop between policymakers and the outcomes that actually come from our laws and policies. Right now, we're just sort of putting things out there and hoping that we get what we want without doing what the private sector does, which is really say, is this working as we're going? Can we check in? Can lawmakers and others sort of

work with the executive branch in new ways to say, let's tweak this as it goes along so that we get the outcomes that our laws and policies intend. I still think all of these things can be done, but it's very hard to do it in the current environment of chaos and fear. Chaos, fear, but also speed. And that's often what the private sector brings. And as you say, a lot of your

offerings and prioritization here feel like very private sector orientation of prioritizing talent and streamlining processes. Realistically, if they didn't, as you quote, "run rush-shod," if they went along with Congress, how much longer would that take? Are the incentives of politicians aligned with ultimately remaking with efficiency?

I think the incentives of politicians come from the people and that the people need to ask their politicians to be more focused on the how of government and not just the what. Whatever you want government to do, it has to actually be able to do it. And I think if the people say, look, this matters how we are structured to achieve our policy goals, they will ultimately be responsive to that. Right now, again, it's very hard because there's so much chaos going on. But I do think we'll get to a place where that conversation can happen.

Yes, it would be a little bit slower, and yes, I have called for things to move faster, but the core foundations of our government are good and we should be protecting them right now as well. Is Elon, is the so-called Department of Government Efficiency the right arbiter of this if they do it in the right way?

Elon, I think, has shown that he's not going to do it in a way that's consistent with the core values of our government, unfortunately. We still need it done, but we need it done probably first at the state and local level so that we can show how to do it right and then bring it back to the federal government and do it the way that it needs to be done for the American people.

Jennifer Palka, Senior Fellow at the NIS Cannon Center, we thank you. Now coming up, Edith Young from Race Capital joins us next on the state of crypto under the Trump administration. This is Bloomberg.

Success. It's discipline. It's teamwork. It's the drive and passion inside of us that comes before all recognition. It's the best in each of us made better by the best in all of us. Whatever success looks like to you, Stiefel is invested in yours. That's why Stiefel is one of the fastest growing global wealth management firms in the country. So when you're ready to chase success, our financial advisors are ready for you at

At Stiefel, we invest everything into our advisors so they can invest everything into their clients. That means direct access to one of the industry's largest equity research franchises and a leading middle market investment bank.

And it's why Stiefel has won the J.D. Power Award for Employee Advisor Satisfaction two years in a row. If you're an advisor or an investor, choose Stiefel, where success meets success. Stiefel Nicholas & Company, Inc., member SIPC and NYSE. For J.D. Power 2024 award information, visit jdpower.com slash awards. Compensation provided for using, not obtaining the award.

The average time to hire for most organizations is 30 to 45 days. Are you tired of a costly and lengthy hiring process? Simplify and speed up your recruitment by using the experts at Express Employment Professionals.

Reduce time to hire, cut down on multiple interviews, and lower your recruitment costs. Whether you're looking for contract workers or a new team member, our streamlined recruiting, candidate screening, and hiring process is more efficient than hiring on your own. Visit ExpressPros.com today. Haven't used a staffing company before? We know you enjoy learning new things and keeping up with trends and efficiencies.

Make a change this year with your hiring. Businesses are navigating a hiring landscape that has never been more expensive or regulated. Start at ExpressPros.com to find the location near you. With more than 860 locally owned offices, you'll get the hiring support you need at ExpressPros.com.

Senator Bill Hagerty will introduce legislation today to create a framework for stablecoins. This is the latest push among Republicans to create a crypto-friendly guideline for the industry that's a priority for President Trump. Let's bring in Edith Young for today's VC Spotlight, general partner at Race Capital, an early-stage Silicon Valley VC fund investing in all things infrastructure.

Edith, why don't you walk us through what this new administration means for the crypto landscape and how you're thinking about potential opportunities going forward?

Yeah, so one of my predictions for 2025 is for President Trump to create the Bitcoin Reserve. And this is only his third week in office, and I don't have all the tea leaves yet. But I did spend some time digging into how the U.S. government holds our other reserve asset today. Let's take gold as an example. It's actually managed by the Treasury Department.

And the U.S. actually holds over 8,100 tons of gold reserves today and is managed by the Treasury Department. And what's really interesting in particular is being oversight by the Inspector General of the Treasury Department. And this role is currently vacant. No one is in this role today.

And what's also really interesting is that that role is supposed to do custody, security, audit, and set all the policy around gold. So for us as US to think about, should we have a Bitcoin reserve? The key thing I think for the administration and of course, David Sachs, our crypto star to think about is why do we want a reserve? And historically is really for to hedge against inflation,

At the same time, you know, and of course, we already, U.S., already have over 200,000 of Bitcoin in custody today. But the key thing is really is the government do need to diversify. But Bitcoin is fluctuating quite a bit. Is this something that we really want to do? And I guess this afternoon we'll find out more.

You, of course, are well known for your backing of Solana. So perhaps I dare say slight talking of book to say there should be digital asset reserve rather than perhaps just a Bitcoin reserve, plain and simple. But I'm interested as to what the stablecoin adoption or indeed clarity can bring to actual us using crypto more easily with real tangible benefits that isn't just about asset purchases.

Yeah, absolutely. I'm actually very, very bullish on stablecoin in general. I think in 2024, over $200 billion of stable market cap, which is over 50% increase year over year. And particularly what I'm really interested in is the whole concept of open pay-fi technology.

infrastructure and I think is really really aligned with President Trump the administration with the executive order which is all about strengthening American leadership in digital finance so think about it the more the US dominated stablecoin being adopted means we need to kind of think about really is the traditional pay fight means credit card

remittances, cross-border payment, and all these old infrastructure is slow, it's expensive, and Visa was actually established in 1958.

58, 66 years ago. It's a long time and this rail is very old. So having like stable coin, particularly US dominated, I think will drive more use case for US dollar and it will really, really align with and think through the whole infrastructure is not only about transaction layer, which is Solana,

at the finance layer, which is human finance, and more so is also compliance, KYC security. So there are a lot of other opportunities for venture to invest and pay attention to. - You mentioned President Trump's executive order. His rhetoric has also brought some volatility to the sector. I mean, just this weekend, we saw huge liquidations, this risk off trade in crypto.

Curious if you find that U.S. dependency on how the headlines here at home are really driving those movements. Is crypto a little too S.U.S. dependent at the moment?

I think crypto, in some sense, is the other way around. The United States needs crypto innovation. Before President Trump, the Biden administration really has been using lawsuits to manage the whole policy. This is really not the way to go. I think the Trump presidency, in particular with the new crypto czar,

really set the stage as now the America wants to be in the leaders, the forefront of this. And I think in general, it set a really positive tone. Although everything's been is again, as I said, mentioned earlier, it's only been third week and I really don't know what's going to happen. But I think the whole world is watching and really looking out for the U.S. leadership in crypto stablecoin and Bitcoin.

Should have it involved a meme coin from the president and indeed the first lady? I think President Trump has had a lot of fun with the Trump and the millennium meme coins before his inaugurations and I watched many, many of the crypto exchange leadership including Brian Armstrong and what they say about the meme coin and all of

And all of them basically say a lot of things that happened early in the internet all looked like fun and don't really know what it is. And I think the key thing for as an investor, particularly as a consumer investor to pay attention to, is really about we need to be careful about speculations. The key thing is really about protecting the normal retail investor.

So it's really the key thing is the power for all the different exchanges to determine which token should be listed to make sure that the U.S. consumer retail investor is being protected. Edith Young from Race Capital, thanks for joining us today.

Let's flip gears into another story we're watching. Elon Musk stepping up his efforts to block OpenAI from restructuring as a for-profit company, claiming it would abandon its public-spirited mission. Now, Musk's lawyers are expected to urge a federal judge to halt OpenAI's conversion plans and a court hearing today. All of this is as OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is currently doing another world tour with the global AI race heating up.

Let's get to that tour with Rachel Metz. He's been in Japan, South Korea. Ultimately, what are we hearing in terms of real innovation and partnership that OpenAI is bringing? Yeah, so this is Sam Altman's second world tour over the last couple of years. This one, he is certainly more well-known. His technology and his company is more established.

And he is making stops in a bunch of different countries, including South Korea, where he had a deal with a really large company focused on social media there. And he's been meeting with SoftBank in Japan. And there's a bunch of other stops as well. Some are focused on meeting with companies

developers, also there's a university in Germany that he's going to hit up. So he's got like a lot of different kinds of people to meet with that are all connected to the company or that he would like to be connected to the company.

Rachel, I'm curious what risks this world tour brings up because obviously the deep-seek developments of last week really amplified this talk about an AI race. Then today we see some retaliation from China on Alphabet in response to Trump's tariffs. So you're seeing tech companies really get caught in the middle. By doing this, is Sam Altman kind of putting himself out there just a little too much?

That's a really good question. There's a lot of diplomacy that needs to come along at this point with heading a really powerful AI company, right? Like this technology has really taken the world by storm over the last couple of years. So there's a lot of talking that has to happen, meetings that have to happen. You have to get a lot of stakeholders invested in what you're doing, either literally invested or figuratively, at least, you know, interested in using the product and buying in

So, I mean, it seems like a reasonably shrewd strategy to, you know, meet with the people that you need to sort of get, at least familiarize them with your face and your company, especially as something like DeepSeek is happening, where people are saying, wait a minute, do we really need to spend this much money to make this AI happen? It's a really interesting time for him to be doing this, that's for sure. Bloomberg's Rachel Metz, thank you.

Tesla sales have fallen in key markets. The electric vehicle maker registered fewer cars in California throughout 2024. Sales of Model 3 fell by 36%. Meanwhile, in France, the EU's second biggest market for battery vehicles, Tesla saw registrations plummet by 63%.

- Kero, meanwhile, EV competition. Well, it's been struggling here in the United States as well, Jackie. Ford, particularly vulnerable with no new EV models coming for two years. Keith Norton has been writing about this in Bloomberg's Big Take, and you call it Ford's EV crisis. Why is it a crisis? Why postponing new models is it making it a crisis, Keith?

Yeah, so they are going to face this kind of EV desert for the next two years where they won't have any new electric vehicle models. They made it what CEO Jim Farley called a big pivot back in August. They canceled plans for a big

electric SUV they said it would have been too pricey and now they're gonna instead focus on lower-priced EVs below $30,000 as well as something called an extended range electric vehicle which has a small gas engine that recharges the battery so that's their new two-pronged strategy which is fine but that means they have no new EVs to sell and their model lineup continues to age for the next two years

Keith, what does this new administration bode for Ford and perhaps other electric vehicle makers, especially with Elon Musk so close to President Trump?

Yeah. And, you know, Elon Musk's Cybertruck is now outselling Ford's F-150 Lightning electric pickup truck, which is not a good turn of events for Ford. Ford also makes one of its other big electric models, the Mustang Mach-E down in Mexico. So if that 25 percent tariff threat comes back, that would add a lot of costs to the Mustang Mach-E. So there is a lot hanging in the balance with the decisions that President Trump makes, not

you know, the least of which that he wants to get rid of that $7,500 tax credit given to EV buyers.

Bloomberg's Keith Norton is a brilliant big take. Go read it. Thanks so much for joining. Now that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Do not forget to check out our podcast. You can find it on the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify and iHeart. And do not forget to tune in for earnings after the bell as well. We've got a whole host, Alphabet, AMD, plenty to be digesting when it comes to earnings. From New York, from San Francisco, this is Bloomberg Technology.

Join Bloomberg in Atlanta or via live stream on February 11th for The Future Investor, Finding the Opportunities. This 2025 event series will examine how companies are investing in their businesses to create efficiencies, innovate their products and services, and improve the customer experience. This series is proudly sponsored by Invesco QQQ. Register at BloombergLive.com slash Future Investor Atlanta.