Deutsch initially linked free will to the many-worlds interpretation in 'Fabric of Reality,' but later changed his view, emphasizing that free will is a creative act where humans bring something new into the world, rather than being caused by earlier events or the state of the universe at the Big Bang.
Deutsch attributes the origin of suffering to a combination of ignorance and anti-rational memes, which create psychological blocks that prevent people from improving their existing answers or solutions.
Deutsch believes that free will and downward causation are related but cautions against understanding free will in terms of causation, as it risks misunderstanding. Instead, he suggests thinking in terms of explanation, where decisions are creative acts rather than caused events.
Deutsch does not think genes coerce humans in a meaningful sense, especially in modern times. He argues that while genes may have coerced humans in prehistoric times due to lack of food, today's coercion comes more from societal structures and anti-rational memes rather than biological impulses.
Deutsch initially supported the Omega Point theory in 'Fabric of Reality' but later felt it had been refuted by observation. He distinguishes his view from Tipler's, stating that while Tipler relies on specific physical mechanisms, Deutsch is more interested in the possibility of humans overcoming cosmological challenges through knowledge and technology.
Deutsch argues that stochastic processes, or physical randomness, do not exist. Instead, what we call randomness in dice rolls or other events is unpredictability due to the complexity of the system, not true randomness. He suggests that probability theory is a useful mathematical model for fairness and unpredictability, but not a reflection of physical reality.
Deutsch is critical of panpsychism, particularly its claim that consciousness exists at the level of fundamental particles. He believes that while humans may feel vulnerable to the idea that consciousness is just atoms, panpsychism is an attempt to avoid this by attributing consciousness to all matter, which he finds unscientific and unnecessary.
Deutsch does not see genes as coercive forces in modern humans. He argues that while genes may have influenced behavior in prehistoric times, today's behavior is more shaped by societal factors, anti-rational memes, and individual choices rather than biological impulses.
Deutsch's principle of optimism holds that humans are inherently creative and capable of improving the world, with only a tiny minority causing net harm. He believes that suffering arises from ignorance and anti-rational memes, not from human nature itself, and that humans can overcome these challenges through knowledge and progress.
Deutsch explains that human minds are universal explainers, meaning they can understand and create explanations for any problem. This universality is tied to the hardware of the brain being a universal computer, which allows for the execution of any program, including creative and novel explanations.
Our Christmas gift to you this year is episode 100: an interview with The Man (TM) himself!
Bruce stumbles over himself fan-boying as he asks all his burning (but geeky) questions about cosmology, the omega point, and probability. How do Deutsch and Tipler differ on optimistic end-time cosmology? Is the omega point refuted by observation (Deutsch) or not (Tipler)? Does heat death contradict the principle of optimism? Is it a bummer? Does stochasticity really not exist? And is it rational to wear a mask during COVID? How do you apply epistemology to a question like that when you lack enough data to severely test your theories but still need to make a decision?
Peter asks: Are free will and downward causation related? Do our genes attempt to coerce us? Why are explanatory and computational universality so confusing? And what if studies show that authoritative parenting is best for children?
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/four-strands/support)