We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Merve Emre on emotional intelligence as corporate control (Re-release)

Merve Emre on emotional intelligence as corporate control (Re-release)

2024/12/31
logo of podcast WorkLife with Adam Grant

WorkLife with Adam Grant

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
A
Adam Grant
M
Merve Emre
Topics
Merve Emre: 对情商概念的理解,从最初的质疑其存在的必要性,到深入探讨其在企业中的应用,以及其与社会结构、性别、权力之间的复杂关系。作者认为情商的概念部分源于对情绪劳动的社会学思考,企业利用人们的情商技能来获利。最初被理论化为劳动形式的情商,后来被重新编码为个体能力,掩盖了员工与企业之间的社会关系。作者对情商作为一个可以追溯到个人大脑、身体或思维任何方面的实际品质的观点持怀疑态度。作者对将个体与社会维度分开持保留态度,认为个体对情绪的表达、感知和管理方式与其社会化过程密切相关。虽然有些人可能天生比其他人更擅长管理情绪,但这并不意味着我们可以忽略社会因素在塑造个体情绪管理能力中的作用。作者指出情绪劳动与性别之间存在密切关系,许多需要沟通和表达关怀的工作主要由女性承担。许多被认为需要高度情绪投入的工作,往往是由女性承担的,这并非偶然。情商的概念,最初源于女性化的工作,现已成为许多工作中的一部分,无论从事这项工作的人是男性还是女性。情商的概念已经成为发达工业国家许多工作定义的一部分,尤其是在护理工作中更为强烈。 作者认为情商被企业用来影响和胁迫员工。文章源于对丹尼尔·戈尔曼畅销书《情商》25周年的反思。戈尔曼书中关于缺乏情商的负面例子与实际情况存在错配,将社会问题归咎于个体缺乏自我控制。戈尔曼将关于贫困和资源不平等的报道解读为个人缺乏自我控制的例子。作者分析了雇主利用情商的动机,认为情商能够压制员工对工作条件的不满。 作者认为,应该关注人际关系,而不是技能,因为技能的概念会使社会现象个体化。将情商视为技能,可以让人们更有自主性,这与公司管理情商的方式形成对比。将情商视为“智力”,会让人们产生一种虚假的自主感,但它也确实赋予人们一种理解自身能力的语言和词汇。情商既可以被视为一种意识形态,也可以被视为一种乌托邦式的想法,即有些人天生就比其他人更擅长处理情绪。 Adam Grant: 对情商的理解,从相信个体差异的存在,到探讨情商在工作场所的应用,以及情商训练与组织文化的关系。作者认为,情商是可学习的技能,在不同的家庭、学校和工作场所,这些技能的培养程度不同。作者认为,情绪管理和调节能力对工作绩效至关重要,但同时也可能是领导者或公司控制员工的最危险手段。作者质疑了情绪需求高的工作主要由女性承担的假设,并指出一些男性主导的职业也对情绪有很高的要求。作者认为,情商培训通常被用作权宜之计,而我们真正需要的是解决组织文化问题。在疫情期间,大学等机构为员工提供的压力管理培训,并没有解决根本问题,例如缺乏儿童保育支持。作者认为,情绪劳动的不同技能对员工造成不同程度的压力和疲惫,表面行为比深度行为更易导致倦怠。人们有强烈的动机去真正体验他们所表现出的情绪,因为伪装会造成心理痛苦。情商之所以有效,是因为没有人想伪装情绪,这使得区分企业控制的开始和结束变得困难。作者理想中的世界是人们不必为了工作安全或工作效益而过度进行情绪劳动,可以坦然表达自己的兴趣或缺乏兴趣。在某些职业中,例如治疗师,情绪表达的管理和控制是必要的,但并不意味着需要完全的透明和可读性。作者主张人们在工作场合有权选择不公开自己的情绪生活。 作者认为,在情绪智力的各个维度中,情绪管理和调节能力对工作绩效最为重要。魅力的培养与情商训练有关,但真正的魅力需要展现出一种毫不费力的感觉。在服务业和利用文学作品培养领导力的课程中,强调练习的重要性,目的是使最终的表现看起来毫不费力。作者建议研究那些缺乏传统魅力特质但仍能取得成功的领导者,以了解他们的成功之道。作者认为,结构比个体更重要,个体更多的是结构的体现。虽然结构塑造了人们的行为,但人们依然能够创造、强化和打破结构。应该将个体和结构这两个概念结合起来思考,并允许它们在某些时刻产生矛盾,从而激发人们对改进和改变的思考。作者认为,如果只关注社会结构,就会产生自我实现的预言,人们不会尝试改变现状。 作者认为,情商是一套技能,人们可以在工作和生活中都应用这些技能。将情商视为技能,并不会消除谈论技能的可能性,但它忽略了社会现象的本质。应该关注人际关系,而不是技能,因为技能的概念会使社会现象个体化。将情商视为“智力”,可以使那些在数学和语言能力方面不突出的人,也能获得一种肯定。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why is Merve Emre skeptical about the concept of emotional intelligence?

Merve Emre is skeptical about emotional intelligence because she believes it has been co-opted as a form of corporate control, used to exploit employees by making them feel responsible for managing their emotions rather than addressing systemic issues in the workplace. She also finds the term 'intelligence' misleading and prefers to focus on the social and relational aspects of emotional labor.

Why does Merve Emre think emotional intelligence is a form of corporate control?

Merve Emre thinks emotional intelligence is a form of corporate control because it shifts the focus from systemic issues to individual behavior. By convincing employees to manage their emotions, it represses resentment towards poor working conditions and makes it easier for corporations to profit from emotional labor without providing adequate support or benefits.

Why does Merve Emre believe emotional intelligence is often used as a band-aid in the corporate world?

Merve Emre believes emotional intelligence is often used as a band-aid because organizations use it to address symptoms of stress and burnout without tackling the root causes, such as abusive bosses, oppressive rules, and lack of job security. This approach allows companies to avoid making meaningful structural changes.

Why does Merve Emre think the term 'emotional labor' is more appropriate than 'emotional intelligence'?

Merve Emre thinks the term 'emotional labor' is more appropriate because it emphasizes the social and relational aspects of managing emotions in the workplace, rather than individualizing the concept. She argues that emotional labor highlights the power dynamics and economic conditions that influence how and why people manage their emotions.

Why does Merve Emre critique the examples used in Daniel Goleman's book on emotional intelligence?

Merve Emre critiques the examples in Daniel Goleman's book because they often attribute violent or emotional outbursts to individual mean-spiritedness, ignoring broader social and economic factors. She finds it problematic that the book fails to contextualize these behaviors within the larger societal issues that may contribute to them.

Why does Merve Emre think emotional intelligence is gendered and how has this changed over time?

Merve Emre thinks emotional intelligence is gendered because it originated from feminized concepts of emotional labor, which are disproportionately expected from women in care and service jobs. However, she notes that as the service sector has expanded, the expectation to perform emotional labor has spread to jobs regardless of gender, though care work remains largely dominated by women.

Why does Merve Emre think it's important to consider the social context in emotional intelligence research?

Merve Emre thinks it's important to consider the social context in emotional intelligence research because ignoring broader cultural and structural forces can lead to misleading conclusions. For example, the ability to delay gratification in the marshmallow study is influenced by social class and trust in authority, which are often overlooked in individual-focused research.

Why does Merve Emre advocate for the freedom to withhold emotions in the workplace?

Merve Emre advocates for the freedom to withhold emotions in the workplace because she believes it should be acceptable for employees to not always make their emotional lives available to others. This freedom can reduce the pressure to perform emotional labor and protect workers from burnout and job insecurity.

Why does Merve Emre think charisma is related to emotional intelligence?

Merve Emre thinks charisma is related to emotional intelligence because both involve the ability to control and manage one's emotions to influence others. However, she notes that charisma often appears effortless, which can hide the effort and rehearsal that go into projecting a charismatic front.

Shownotes Transcript

It's been 25 years since the concept of emotional intelligence exploded onto the scene. Cultural critic Merve Emre makes a bold case that in the wrong hands, it can be used to exploit people. We unpack the surprising roots of emotional intelligence, how it's been co-opted as a form of corporate control and why you might want to rethink some of your core assumptions about emotions at work. This episode originally aired on June 8, 2021.

You can find the full transcript for this episode at go.ted.com/T4GTscript6 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy) for more information.