Shownotes Transcript
This episode is brought to you by PNC Bank. Some things should be boring, like banking. Boring is safe and reliable. You don't want your bank to be surprising. Surprising is for podcasts about seemingly insignificant inventions that impact our lives, not banks. PNC Bank strives to be boring with your money so you can be happily fulfilled with your life. PNC Bank, brilliantly boring since 1865.
Brilliantly boring since 1865 is a service mark of the PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., PNC Bank, National Association, member FDIC.
Lowe's knows that taking on more projects should be rewarding. That's why loyalty members get more every day with rewards for every home or business purchase. Plus, shop weekly member deals and get access to free standard shipping. So, what are you waiting for? Join for free today. Lowe's. We help you save. Loyalty programs subject to terms and conditions. Details at lowes.com slash terms. Subject to change.
This is 99% Invisible. I'm Roman Mars.
Back in 2021, Chris Ochter, a farmer in Saskatchewan, Canada, was hashing out a contract with a buyer interested in purchasing some of his flax. And they've dealt with each other before. They've formed contracts before. This is Eric Goldman, a law professor at Santa Clara University Law School. And he says that the farmer, Chris, and the buyer had a history. They would often discuss these grain orders over text.
And so they're working on a new contract for this year's crop. And the buyer sends over a standard form that says, here's the offer for buying your flax. And the seller responds with the thumbs up emoji.
Between discussing the contract in March and the delivery date in November, the price of flax increased. That's producer Talen Stradley. That year, there was a drought, and the flax harvest was smaller than many farmers expected. As the supply of flax went down, its price went up. This would have been a good thing for the buyer, who thought they locked in their contract earlier that year at the lower price. But when November rolled around, no flax was delivered.
The misunderstanding goes back to that thumbs-up emoji. The buyer thought Chris was agreeing to the contract, but Chris, the seller, had a different perspective. The seller explaining the thumbs-up emoji says, I was just acknowledging receipt. I wasn't agreeing to the terms, just like we all have done many times using a thumbs-up emoji. In other words, the seller said he was acknowledging the contract while the buyer said he was signing it.
The buyer sued the seller for breach of contract and damages, bringing the ambiguous nature of emojis into contact with the rigid world of contract law. Is a thumbs up emoji a legally binding signature? This case caught global attention and got people wondering what an emoji means in the eyes of the courts.
A Saskatchewan judge thinks emojis are contractually binding. Last year, Justice Timothy Keene called the thumbs-up emoji a non-traditional but valid response. The court said that the thumbs-up, in this context, was a digital signature. The buyer was awarded roughly $62,000 U.S. dollars in damages. So that single thumbs-up emoji was worth tens of thousands of dollars in that circumstance.
Contract law is all about trying to wring out the nuances of language, and emojis are an increasingly big part of how we communicate. They appear in texts, social media posts, Slack messages, Zoom chats, emails, and when things go wrong, in courtrooms. It's not just this Canadian farmer getting into emoji trouble.
Under former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, the crypto firm FTX approved millions of dollars in expenses using emojis. In Australia, a Twitter user was sued for defamation when they tweeted a single zipper face emoji in response to a question about a lawyer's alleged misconduct. As more emojis end up in evidence, the courts will have to figure out how to handle them.
Judges are running into emojis whether they want to or not, and the judges have to be prepared for it. But emojis can be tricky. Their meaning is constantly in flux, changing quickly in the hyper vortex of Internet culture, which means they present some real challenges as they make their way through the legal system.
Eric Goldman, our lawyer, has probably seen just about every emoji that is passed through the U.S. legal system. He set up keyword alerts in various databases for the terms emoji and emoticon. And I'm keeping a running log of those cases. Now over a thousand opinions that have used the term emoji or emoticon somewhere in their opinions.
This database has given Eric some perspective on the growing problem that is emoji law. In 2016, he found at least 26 court opinions that referenced emojis. By 2023, that number was over 200.
There is a freight train of emojis headed toward the legal system, and Eric wants us to get ahead of it. But right now, the courts are behind. Many of them don't even include emojis in their evidence transcriptions. They'll often cut and paste a chat log, and there will be emojis in it, and then the judges will take them out and just put in a bracket, emoji, without being specific even what emoji it was, but certainly without showing it to us.
In other words, for some old school judges, emojis don't merit any consideration. Which is wild, because emojis can be central to how we understand the meaning of a message. I don't think they're different from words. I think they're the exact same thing as words. This is Adam Oleksik. He's a linguist, and he researches Gen Z slang in particular. Adam was shocked when I told him that some judges simply ignore emojis.
It's really terrible. They have such a critical function frequently of telling you the vibe of the sentence. This is part of what makes emojis unique to other written communication.
Sure, sometimes they might be a literal replacement for a word, like sending a pizza emoji when someone asks what you want for dinner. But they can also provide what linguists call a tone tag. To indicate the tone of the sentence. So if I say, like, I had a great time today, thumbs up emoji. It could be a tone tag for older people saying, like, they had a great time. But it could be a tone tag for younger people saying, I'm joking. This is ironic. This is a sarcastic thumbs up. I did not have a great time.
The meaning of emojis can vary depending on a user's age, location, profession, even their political ideology. These meanings are constantly shifting. From about 2010 to 2015, emojis were mostly unironic online. So if you were laughing, you just send somebody the laughing, crying emoji.
However, around like, I don't know, my inflection point is 2016, 2017, people started seeing like these traditional emojis as a little bit cringe and started moving to different ways to express laughter. So we started turning to the crying emoji. And at a certain point that gets overused. And now Gen Z people are using the skull emoji. And so these emojis are rapidly evolving. And unless you're tapped into the chronically online space, you're going to miss out on the nuance there.
In some cases, that nuance has to do with the meaning of emojis in different communities and subcultures. The goat emoji is used by sports fans to mean the greatest of all time. The infinity emoji is used to represent neurodiversity. The watermelon emoji is used to express support for Palestine. For the most part, these subcultural emojis are just a way for communities to connect over shared symbols. But they're not always harmless.
Sometimes, the meaning of certain emojis can get pretty dark and even veer into criminal territory.
Let me give you an example of an emoji that has slang usage. The crown emoji has very specific meaning in the sex trafficking context. It's basically used to signal the relationship between a pimp and a sex worker, where the sex worker is either admitting to some subordinate relationship or is being offered to take on that subordinate relationship.
The courts might be slow to get on board with emojis, but they're used to dealing with ambiguous encoded communications of other kinds. They've always had to consider complexities of human communication, even offline, like the way things were said, who was saying it, and where.
This is something that judges and the legal system deal with all the time. And frankly, they're really quite good at it. Juries will watch when a witness testifies about their facial expressions, their vocal inflections, their body language, and factor that into the trustworthiness of the speaker. As an example, when a bad guy gives you a compliment, you know they're not trying to be nice. It is a threat. Think diehard.
It's a very nice suit, Mr. Takagi. To be ashamed to ruin it. So this happens every day. Go watch Law & Order or CSI or whatever. This is happening all the time on the TV shows too. And so emojis are just another piece of that. They're just another part of the overall package of communication that's being delivered between speakers. It's not unusual. That's just the way human communication goes.
But for emojis, there is one key piece of technical knowledge that judges, lawyers and juries have to grasp. It's something that makes emojis fundamentally different from the spoken and written language the courts are used to. And that's the fact that sometimes the emoji that a person sends is different from the emoji that another person receives.
Something as simple as an Apple phone sending an emoji to an Android phone could result in a different emoji design and therefore a different message. It is possible that the emoji depiction that the sender sees is different from the emoji depiction that the recipient sees. And it's possible, if not likely, that the sender and recipient don't know that they're seeing slightly different images.
Whether it's Apple, Android, Meta, Slack, or X, each platform has their own unique emoji designs. Some are more detailed, some are quite simple, some are three-dimensional, some are flat, and sometimes they don't even show the same object. Take, for example, the infamous gun emoji.
Different platforms show the gun emoji very differently. At first, many platforms depicted the pistol as a firearm, specifically a revolver. In the following years, the emoji kept popping up in courts as a threat. A man in France was sentenced to three months in jail after texting the gun emoji to his ex-girlfriend. In Virginia, a 12-year-old girl was charged with threatening her school after using the gun, knife, and bomb emojis in an Instagram post.
It got to the point where a gun control organization launched a campaign to change the emoji's design. Apple changed their gun emoji in 2016, depicting it as a water gun instead. And many other companies did the same. But then, just last year, Elon Musk reverted X's water gun emoji back to a pistol. Now, some platforms show water guns and some show firearms, and there's no clear way to know which version other people are seeing.
Not even the direction of the pistol emoji is the same across platforms, making things complicated when the emoji shows up in court. Usually, it points to the left, but in some cases, it's rotated slightly, so it looks like it's pointing at the viewer. At least one platform has the gun emoji facing the opposite direction, to the right.
Of course, the direction a gun is pointed is pretty important to the meaning of a message. Let's say, for instance, you have the following emojis. A crocodile, a pistol, and a cop.
Or at least advocating for crocodiles to shoot cops.
The Pistol is an especially chaotic example, and you'd be forgiven for thinking it's the Wild West when you send emojis across platforms. But there's actually an organization that's supposed to keep all emojis looking the same, at least in theory. It's called Unicode. Unicode.
Unicode is like a universal dictionary that computers use to display text properly. It works by assigning a unique ID number for every character you type. That ID is readable across all platforms and languages. It can get a little complicated, but what it boils down to is this. Unicode is what ensures the letter A on your computer shows up as an A on someone else's computer, even if they live on the other side of the world.
Unicode started by standardizing letters, but 15 years ago, they moved into the emoji space. They assigned each emoji an ID made of a string of numbers and then provided a simple black and white design for reference. The idea was to create a coherent set of emojis that all platforms would recognize.
The problem is that Unicode doesn't really have any power to enforce this standardization. There are no emoji inspectors, no emoji cops. Unicode simply provides a system that most companies agree to use, so all their devices play nice. And while Unicode might want to enforce the sameness of emojis across different platforms, there are a number of competing forces pushing companies to differentiate.
The first is branding. A number of operating system vendors view emojis as a competitive differentiator. If they have slicker emojis, they think that's going to increase adoption for them. Another factor that Eric thinks is pushing companies to vary their design is copyright law, which requires that emojis not be too similar.
A company's emoji is considered an original illustration. Nobody wants to open themselves up to a lawsuit by copying someone else's work. And so every platform tweaks its emoji designs.
The differences between what is sent and what is received could effectively double the work of the courts. And while they're perfectly capable of interpreting emojis, they have to make sure that they're interpreting the right ones. And this is where Eric steps in. He trains lawyers and judges on all of these intricacies so that they can be prepared for future emoji cases before a bad decision is made. What I
So, for emojis to be effectively interpreted in courts, they have to clear multiple hurdles.
First, the court has to actually recognize emojis as an important part of conversation and include them in the evidence. Then, they have to consider all the various contextual meanings of an emoji. Finally, they should keep in mind what emoji design was sent and what emoji design was received. Eric points out that the thumbs-up case with the Saskatchewan farmer is a good example of how courts should handle emojis.
In this thumbs-up case, the court didn't just look at this one message. They looked at the text messages around the thumbs-up, where they discussed the contract. They also looked at past contracts that were approved in a similar way, with a brief, okay, or yup, sent over text.
And so the court says, looking at the emoji in the context of the conversation and with the context of past dealings with each other, it looks like that thumbs up was an assent to the contract. But I think that the court's methodology, not just to look at the emoji in the abstract, but to put it in context, was exactly what we would hope the courts would do. And I think based on that, to me, it looked like the court got the right outcome.
Human communication has always been messy. Every time you open your mouth or type out a message and try to convey your thoughts to someone else, there's a chance they'll misunderstand. And that's why we have judges, lawyers, and juries in the first place. Legal conflicts often involve competing points of view that are subjective and muddled and up for interpretation. That's even more true when people are talking across generational differences and new technologies. So remember...
If you're texting about something illegal, toss in a few random emojis for good measure. Keep the courts on their toes. Coming up after the break, we'll talk with author Keith Houston about the origins of the poop emoji. That's after these ads.
Yeah.
Combining a dynamic sporting personality with elegance and agility, it delivers an instinctive drive. Its assertive stance hints at an equally refined driving performance, defining true modern luxury. The Range Rover Sport features the latest innovations in comfort and convenience.
The cabin air purification system alongside the active noise cancellation creates a new level of quality, comfort, and control. Terrain Response 2 offers seven terrain modes to choose from, fine-tuning the vehicle for any challenging roads ahead. A force inside and out, the Range Rover Sport is available with a choice of powerful engines, including a plug-in hybrid with an estimated range of 53 miles. Build your Range Rover Sport at rangerover.com slash us slash sport.
You booked your flights. You booked your place to stay. Now what? Adventure doesn't need to begin when you arrive. With Get Your Guide, planning is as much of an experience as the trip itself. Get Your Guide is an online platform where you can discover and book a range of activities in the U.S. and around the world.
Thank you.
There is something for everyone, whether it's must-see iconic attractions or unexpected under-the-radar gems. With flexible booking options, mobile tickets, and millions of verified reviews, I'm one of those five-star reviews, you'll find everything you need to simplify trip planning and book the best things to do in thousands of destinations. Discover and book experiences for your next trip at getyourguide.com. That's getyourguide.com.
There is no filler. Every item is chosen for its craftsmanship, design, and lasting value.
My house is like an article furniture longitudinal study. I sleep in an article bed. My wife, Joy, works at and we eat at an article dining room table and we sit in article chairs. And it has been this way for years and years and years. All the furniture I've ever gotten from article is still in service and performing at its peak.
Article is offering our listeners $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more. To claim, visit article.com slash 99 and the discount will be automatically applied at checkout. That's article.com slash 99 for $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more.
Thank you.
With their collection of cutting-edge design tools, anyone can build a bespoke online presence that perfectly fits their brand or business. And Squarespace's intuitive built-in analytics tools can help you make smarter business decisions by letting you review website traffic, focus on key areas of engagement, and track revenue from bookings, invoices, or product sales, all from one place. I set up RomanMars.com, my Squarespace site, so long ago it was...
very simple and it's sort of dynamically refreshed by social media posts and other tools and so I don't really have to fuss with it which is the greatest gift Squarespace can give me head to squarespace.com slash invisible for a free trial and when you're ready to launch use offer code invisible to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain
We're back with 99pi favorite author Keith Houston, who has a new book called Face with Tears of Joy, which comes out in July. The book explores the history of various emojis, including one of the most iconic, the poop emoji. Here's Keith.
there is this anime called, or was this anime called, Dr. Slump. And one of the characters was called Poop Boy, or Unshikun. And he was a poo done by the main character, or the title character, Dr. Slump, Senbei Norimaki. He had some friends. His friends were Manure Boy, Bird Poop Boy, Old Man Poop, and Soft Serve Ice Cream Boy, who the others mistook for a poo. And so this character was quite popular. Also, apparently, in Japanese, the term Unshi...
It kind of has connotations of sort of good luck, even though it literally means poop. And so weirdly, or perhaps not, the notion of poop being in some way cute or lucky or just a good thing to have around made its way into this first emoji set. So what did this original poop emoji look like?
The original poop emoji, like all of the other initial emoji, was tiny. It was something like, I think, 12 pixels by 12 pixels. And it just, it looks like a poop. It doesn't have eyes. It's not smiling. It's just a poop. Of course, the engineers or designers who were working on these were really constrained by the technology of the time. They were all monochrome. All the phones at this point had black and white screens or LCD screens. And yet they became popular.
They became this fundamentally useful part of Japanese internet culture. I've read a theory that Japanese can be quite a formal language. And I think some users felt that emoji gave them a kind of a way out or helped them to express really complex sentiments that would otherwise be quite difficult. Not only that, even just entering text on a keyboard or a Japanese phone could be quite difficult. So again, emoji were a kind of a shortcut to expressing emotions or sentiments that were just difficult.
fundamentally quite difficult or quite time consuming to express otherwise.
And what this meant was that in the mid-2000s, when Google wanted to broaden its reach into Asia and Japan, it wanted to launch Gmail. And one particular product manager insisted that emoji had to be part of this. He told his bosses, we can't launch Gmail in Japan without emoji. And was he insisting on this because of the way emoji just broadened the expression? Like, what do you attribute to his insistence that emoji be part of any email? It...
Seems like emoji just felt like an integral part of electronic communication at that point. One of the Googlers on this, Kat Momoi, he wrote that emails just felt kind of dry and boring if they didn't have emoji. There was something lacking. They had given something to written communication which hadn't existed previously. And also, they just made it easier to express emotion. And I think it's quite telling that someone at Google, which is very data-driven,
was able to express this thing. And then some of the engineers in the Gmail project did a bit of statistical analysis and found that the poop emoji that existed already was actually quite popular. It was relatively well used. And so, you know, he appealed both to, I think, the heart and to the head of his bosses. And they said, okay, fine, we can have emoji and you can have the poop.
The first step is you can have emoji. And the second step is you can have the poop emoji, which might not translate to, you know, a seriously minded company like Google necessarily. Was there some pushback about the poop emoji in particular? There was. I think there was just a thought that this is ridiculous. Why do we need to have an animated poop in our Gmail product? But again, you know, this appeal to the data won the day.
And the poop arrived. So you mentioned that this Google poop emoji was a pile of poo with flies around it. Can you talk a little bit about the evolution of the design of the poop emoji? There are basically, there are two flavors. I've got a terrible thing to say. There are two flavors of poop emoji. The one which everyone will be most familiar with is the smiling poop emoji. And the other one is just a faceless poop, perhaps with flies, perhaps not.
And basically this came down to which of two Japanese mobile companies one followed. The first one, which was called J-Phone, if I remember rightly, had just a faceless, had a sort of faceless, this is just a poop icon. And the second one to introduce it was called KDDI, and they had a smiling poop emoji. And it really just, it's really interesting to try and follow the history of any one particular emoji back because it's,
There are so many of them and there are so many different potential inspirations for each one. But this one can be traced fairly clearly back. You know, if you look at a poop emoji and it's got eyes, it's descended from KDDI. And if you look at it and it doesn't, it's descended from J-Phone. Yeah. So talk about the popularity or the impact of the poop emoji since its adoption and widespread use on lots of different platforms. Well, this is really interesting. It's not popular and no one likes it. Yeah.
At least in the West. What happened was Google launched Gmail with their emoji and they did quite a responsible thing, which was it went to this organization called Unicode. It's just a private corporation headquartered in California. Google went to Unicode and say, we'd like to standardize this stuff. And it turned out Unicode were actually already looking at it. They had formed something called the Symbols Committee or Symbols Subcommittee. And within a few years,
Unicode had standardized this and what they did was they basically imported all the emoji that were in use in Japan by these different mobile operators and they just kind of inherited the poop. They didn't think about it. It just came along with, you know, smiling faces and bento boxes and bullet trains and a poop.
And so it went into, I think it was Unicode version 6, came out in 2010, and the poop was rubber stamped, so to speak, as an official emoji. But only four years later, there was a survey that found that the poop emoji was the 88th most popular emoji on Twitter.
And then another report in about 2022, so just a few years ago, Emoji did this big thing called the US Emoji Trend Report, found that the poop emoji was the least popular emoji for basically every generation from Gen Z back down to boomers. No one likes it. But I think the telling thing is that
I think it's become this kind of emblem of emoji. What do you think about when you think about emoji? Maybe a smiley yellow face, but that existed before. You know, that was an icon. That was a concept that kind of merged into emoji. The poop emoji is just the poop emoji. It exists in our heads because emoji exists.
And so you have Patrick Stewart voicing a poop emoji in the Emoji Movie. You know, I can buy a crocheted poop emoji squishy toy or like a plush emoji or a 3D printed gold emoji. Any number of things that are shaped like the poop emoji. It seems to have transcended emoji. I don't know, it's done something. It's managed to achieve escape velocity. God, that's a terrible, like another terrible metaphor in the context of a poop emoji.
But despite the fact that the poop emoji has achieved, as you would say, escape velocity, it hasn't been without controversy, right? Like there was an incident in 2016 or 2017 that you've actually written about. Right. So emoji at that point were six or seven years old or they were officially six or seven years old. And this organization, the Unicode Consortium, which manages emoji on our behalf,
They were undergoing or experiencing a few sort of internal ructions where some members who are very serious and they were interested in, we will encode this ancient language, we'll improve support for this sort of punctuation. They were getting really hacked off with how much attention emoji was being given within the consortium. But I think also they were almost angry because it was getting so much attention outside of the consortium. And so
there was one particular year where the yearly set of emoji for next year's standard being debated.
And one of them was a frowning poo or poo with sad face. And one particular Unicode contributor wrote a comment. He said,
He was just absolutely incandescent that the Unicode technical committee in any way should have to care about this. This whole era of this unrest was called Emojigeddon. But we came out of it on the other side. And one of the funny things is that when a character goes into Unicode, there's no way to take it out. So the poo is in there. It doesn't matter how much you hate it. So it may be the least popular emoji ever in the long history, long future history of emoji, but we will never be truly rid of it.
That was Keith Houston. His book, Face with Tears of Joy, A Natural History of Emoji, will be out in July. And all Keith Houston books are must-haves for 99pi fans. So pre-order it now.
The 99% Invisible logo was created by Stephan Lawrence.
We are part of the SiriusXM podcast family, now headquartered six blocks north in the Pandora building in beautiful Uptown, Oakland, California. You can find us mostly on Blue Sky as well as our own Discord server. There's a link to that as well as every past episode of 99PI at 99PI.org.
Imagine what's possible in your business career when learning doesn't get in the way of life. At Capella University, our game-changing FlexPath learning format is available in select business programs and lets you learn at a time and pace that works for you.
That means you don't have to put your life on hold while earning your business degree. Instead, enjoy learning your way and earn your degree without missing a beat. A different future is closer than you think with Capella University. Learn more at capella.edu.
The mother of all sales is happening right now at Designer Shoe Warehouse. Score up to 25% off big deal brands like Adidas, Crocs, Converse, Reebok, and more. And just in time for Mother's Day, buy a perfect gift for her or for you because mama needs a new pair of shoes. And hurry, this mother-loving deal ends Sunday. Save up to 25% at your DSW store or DSW.com today.