We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Why These Salmon Are On Anxiety Meds

Why These Salmon Are On Anxiety Meds

2025/4/23
logo of podcast Short Wave

Short Wave

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
J
Jack Brand
J
Jonathan Lambert
K
Karen Kidd
O
Olivia Simons
Topics
Jonathan Lambert: 人类活动导致大量药物残留物进入河流和溪流等水体,这些药物残留物对水生动物,特别是鲑鱼的生存和行为造成了潜在的威胁。实验室研究已经表明,某些药物会改变鱼类的行为模式,例如使它们更具攻击性或更倾向于冒险。然而,这些药物对野生鱼类行为的影响仍然有待进一步研究。 Jack Brand: 我们进行了一项研究,将抗焦虑药物和止痛药植入瑞典的野生大西洋鲑鱼体内,并追踪它们的迁移行为。研究结果显示,抗焦虑药物氯氮卓能够提高鲑鱼的迁移成功率,使它们更快地通过水力发电大坝等障碍物。然而,这种药物也使鲑鱼更孤僻,更倾向于单独行动,这可能会增加它们被捕食的风险。 Olivia Simons: 水力发电大坝的涡轮机对鲑鱼的迁移构成严重威胁,可能导致受伤甚至死亡。因此,鲑鱼在迁移过程中需要谨慎小心,避免冒险。 Karen Kidd: 目前,我们对多种药物混合污染对鱼类的影响知之甚少。各种药物的混合作用可能会对鱼类的健康和行为产生复杂的影响,这需要进一步的研究来揭示。 Jonathan Lambert: 除了研究药物对鱼类行为的影响之外,我们还需要关注如何减少药物污染。改进污水处理厂的过滤系统,以及研发更环保的药物,都是减少药物污染的有效途径。

Deep Dive

Chapters
The episode explores the impact of pharmaceutical pollution on aquatic life, focusing on a study where scientists implanted anti-anxiety drugs into salmon to observe their behavior during migration. The results were surprising, showing that the drugs affected the salmon's migration success and social behavior.
  • Researchers found over 900 pharmaceutical ingredients in waterways.
  • A study implanted anti-anxiety and pain medication into salmon.
  • The anti-anxiety drug improved migration success but decreased shoaling behavior.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Support for NPR and the following message come from ID Tech. ID Tech is a summer camp for ages 7 to 17 with over 50 courses like BattleBots, AI, coding, game design, and more. Visit IDTech.com and use code IDTech to save $150. You're listening to Shortwave from NPR.

Hey, short wavers. Emily Kwong here. And today I am joined by NPR science reporter Jonathan Lambert. Hey, John. Hey, Emily. John, I must thank you for all the hilarious and fascinating science stories you've been bringing us lately. Like chimps contagiously peeing or iguanas sailing the high seas or...

Or this most recent banger, salmon on drugs. What's that about? Yeah, salmon on drugs, specifically anti-anxiety drugs. How are salmon getting a hold of, not that they have hands, but how are they getting a hold of anti-anxiety pills? Basically through us. So when humans take medication, like for anxiety or bacterial infections, our bodies don't use all of it and we end up peeing out some of the chemicals.

That can end up in wastewater, which can get into rivers and streams. And runoff from pharmaceutical factories gets into waterways too. All told, researchers have found more than 900 different pharmaceutical ingredients in waterways around the world. 900 different ingredients. That's a lot. Yeah. Well, how does this then affect the fish and other aquatic creatures?

We're not entirely sure. Scientists have been trying to figure out what all this pollution could be doing to fish, and most of that has been done in the lab. Those experiments have shown that giving fish anxiety meds, for instance...

kind of messes with their behavior. How so? Like when researchers give fish medicine on purpose, what happens? Yeah, so if researchers give fish, say, a benzodiazepine like Xanax or an SSRI like Sertraline in the lab, these fish become more antisocial and more prone to take risks. But it's hard to say how these drugs affect their behavior out in the wild.

We can't, you know, dump a bunch of pharmaceuticals into the river. That's Jack Brand. He's a biologist at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. And he worked on a study that kind of did the next best thing from a scientific perspective. The study was published in the Journal of Science this past month. The team implanted pharmaceuticals in Atlantic salmon in Sweden and monitored how two drugs, an anxiety med and a pain med, influenced their migration behavior.

I'm so curious. What happened? Something kind of unexpected. The anxiety medication actually improved the migration success of the salmon. Wait, so the drugs helped? In this narrow sense, yeah, they did seem to help. But that's not the whole story. Okay, so today on the show, how scientists managed to drug salmon in the wild.

what pharmaceutical pollution could be doing to aquatic animals worldwide, and what we can do about it. You're listening to Shortwave, the science podcast from NPR.

Support for this podcast and the following message come from Robinhood. Missions to Mars, driverless cars, AI chatbots. Feels like the future has already arrived. Robinhood is built for the future of trading. Their intuitive design helps make trading more seamless. Spot opportunities and take control of your trades and even trade your favorite assets all in one place. The future of trading is fast, powerful, and precise. Experience it now on Robinhood.

Sign up today. Investing is risky. Robinhood Financial LLC member SIPC is a registered broker-dealer. This message comes from NPR sponsor Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, where hundreds of researchers and clinicians make new discoveries inspired by the work of previous Dana-Farber scientists. See why nothing is as effective against cancer as a relentless succession of breakthroughs. Learn more about their momentum. Go to danafarber.org slash everywhere.

Okay, John, so let's back up a second because pharmaceutical drugs are designed to work on human brains and bodies, right? So how do they end up affecting the brains and bodies of fish? Yeah, so it turns out a lot of drugs that act on our minds target parts of the brain that have a

deep evolutionary history, and so they're shared by lots of different animals. So they can work on salmon in similar ways that work on humans. Now, it's not like fish are literally popping pills like we would. What's happening is the pills are getting super diluted in rivers and entering their bodies through their gills. Oh, huh. Yeah.

But even with super low concentrations, like what a fish would encounter in the wild, these drugs are still altering their behavior in the lab. This all makes sense. It sounds like a big problem. So there have been a lot of experiments to understand the problem on a deeper level, but way fewer field experiments. So how are researchers studying the effects of drug exposure in the wild?

in the wild. So researchers put these like slow release capsules into the bodies of over 250 juvenile hatchery-raised Atlantic salmon. The capsules released two drugs, a benzodiazepine called Clobazam used to treat anxiety and an opioid used for pain management called Tramadol. So why these two drugs, Clobazam and Tramadol in particular?

In humans, these drugs can cause harmful interactions, and so the researchers wanted to see if combining them had, like, extra bad effects. Yikes, okay. They're also found in lots of rivers around the world, but not in the river where these particular salmon live. Okay, so this sounds like a very good river in which to conduct this study. Yeah, yeah, exactly. Overall, they had four different treatments. No drug, only Clobazam, only Tramadol, and both. Okay, well, what did they do next?

They also implanted these tracking devices so the scientists could follow the fish as they migrated from a release site in a Swedish river out to the Baltic Sea. So they put like GPS on the fish?

Not exactly. They were like little devices that emit a sound, and then the researchers placed a bunch of receivers along the migratory route that pick up that sound, allowing them to kind of like reconstruct the journey. Oh, so it's like air tags for salmon. Yeah. All right. So they have these experimental conditions. They have the salmon trackers. What did they find? It was a bit of a surprise. So one drug, the pain medication, didn't seem to make any difference.

But it turned out that fish exposed to Clobazam were actually more successful in reaching the Baltic Sea than salmon who weren't exposed. Interesting. Let's break this down a little bit. Why would an anti-anxiety drug like Clobazam...

make fish better at migrating. Yeah, the researchers aren't 100% sure, but one part of their results hints at an answer. So this route, this migration route, is not exactly like a lazy river. There are two hydropower dams, each with a series of turbines that the fish have to cross to get to their destination. Those can be pretty hairy. Here's Olivia Simons, a salmon biologist at the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research.

Basically, with turbine passage, you can get injuries, which are, of course, not good if you have a long way to swim. And you also get mortality. So if they're struck by a blade, they can die. So that's not good. It's tough out here being a salmon. Yeah. So non-drugged fish really took their time navigating these dams. Like, I imagine them waiting together in a group and going, oh, not yet. Wait, wait. Okay. Okay.

But the Clobazam-exposed fish did it two and a half to three times faster. Those drugged fish were like, I'm ready. Yeah, yeah. Here's how Brand explained it.

So we actually found that more Clobazam-exposed fish eventually migrated through the river and reached the Baltic Sea, their destination, more than unexposed fish. Poor salmon friends. So the anti-anxiety meds made those salmon, you know, I guess migration risk-takers, but it left those unmedicated salmon behind.

Yeah. On the face of it, it kind of seems like this study is basically saying that it's good to give salmon benzos, but the authors caution against that interpretation. Yeah. I imagine that taking more risks might help fish reach the Baltic Sea faster, but it's

It could pose problems once they get there. Exactly. A follow-up lab experiment they did found that Clobazam made salmon less likely to shoal with other salmon. Shoaling is when fish group together for a safety in numbers kind of thing, and setting off on your own could make it easier for ocean predators to pick you off. Yeah, lone wolf. Lone salmon behavior. Yeah. Clobazam essentially made them more antisocial and willing to live a bit more dangerously.

Scaled up, a lot more antisocial and risk-prone salmon could ultimately shrink the population. And that could cause problems for the whole ecosystem. Now, John, migration is just one part of the Atlantic salmon's life cycle, right? So how else do the drugs affect them? Yeah, so it's honestly a little bit of a limitation of this study in that it's just looking at this kind of narrow slice of an animal's life.

Showing that drugs can influence behavior in the wild was still a huge accomplishment. But there are still a lot of unknowns. Right. Clobazam is just one drug. But you said earlier that over 900 different pharmaceutical ingredients have been found in rivers and streams worldwide. Yeah, exactly. Here's what Karen Kidd, an ecotoxicologist at McMaster University, had to say. You think of the soup of pharmaceuticals that are going into our rivers.

That's a huge unknown. We have no idea what those anti-anxiety medications plus the analgesics, plus the antibiotics, plus the anti-epileptics, plus the chemotherapeutics, etc., etc., collectively are doing to fish cancer.

Yeah, absolutely. So is there anything we can do as consumers or just as a society about pharmaceutical pollution that doesn't, you know, require people to stop taking drugs that make their lives better? Yeah, there definitely are things we can do. One way is by designing wastewater treatment plants that do a better job filtering out drugs.

A study from a few years ago actually found that pharmaceutical pollution in rivers is often worse in low- to middle-income countries because wastewater management infrastructure there doesn't catch it all.

Interesting. Okay, so better filtration systems. What else, John? There's also a push to design greener drugs, basically tweaking pharmaceuticals to degrade more easily in the environment, but still be just as effective in humans. That's so interesting. Because, right, there's like...

greener cleaning products out there, greener makeup products, greener medicine could totally be a thing. Yeah, yeah. And these solutions aren't silver bullets, but they could lessen our impact. And with climate change and habitat destruction already majorly disrupting animal lives, it's important to try to do what we can to ensure our waste isn't disrupting their behavior too. John Lambert, another incredible science story. Please come back anytime. Thank you so much. Thank you.

This episode was produced by Hannah Chin and edited by me, Emily Kwong, and Rebecca Ramirez. Tyler Jones checked the facts. Kweisi Lee was the audio engineer. Beth Donovan is our senior director. And Colin Campbell is our senior vice president of podcasting strategy. I'm Emily Kwong. And I'm Jonathan Lambert. Thank you for listening to Shortwave, the science podcast from NPR.

This message comes from NPR sponsor, 1Password. Secure access to your online world, from emails to banking, so you can protect what matters most with 1Password. For a free two-week trial, go to 1Password.com slash NPR.

This message comes from LinkedIn ads. Target your buyers by job title, company, role, and skills with LinkedIn ads. All the professionals you need to reach in one place. Get a $100 credit on your next campaign at linkedin.com slash results. Terms and conditions apply.

This message comes from Warby Parker. What makes a great pair of glasses? At Warby Parker, it's all the invisible extras without the extra cost, like free adjustments for life. Find your pair at warbyparker.com or visit one of their hundreds of stores around the country.