We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Developing an Appetite for AI: ExxonMobil’s Sarah Karthigan

Developing an Appetite for AI: ExxonMobil’s Sarah Karthigan

2021/11/2
logo of podcast Me, Myself, and AI

Me, Myself, and AI

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
S
Sarah Karthigan
Topics
Sarah Karthigan:我在埃克森美孚负责领导利用人工智能为IT运营设计和执行自我修复策略。自我修复的核心是主动监控、检测和修复问题,无需人工干预。我的团队利用人工智能提高效率、降低成本,自动化手动任务,提高安全性和生产力,并帮助科学家和工程师进行决策。我们处理海量数据,人工智能在图像处理、需求预测、动态定价、动态收益管理和交易等方面都有应用。自我修复策略始于监控系统、捕获数据并集成数据,然后利用数据分析、训练机器提取洞见,检测异常并自动修复问题。埃克森美孚有多个团队从事数据科学和人工智能工作,这些团队嵌入不同的业务部门,与业务部门紧密合作。AI项目的性质和发起者取决于业务部门在AI采用和利用方面的成熟度。人工智能帮助地质学家和地球物理学家处理大量非结构化数据,提高了效率和准确性。成功的AI项目实施需要关注文化因素,获得最终用户的认可,并拥有良好的变更管理流程。最初推广AI时,团队通过展示AI的可能性,并先从提供数据分析结果开始,逐步获得用户认可。为了持续改进AI模型,需要监控模型性能、对模型进行再训练,并采用持续改进的方法。为了提升员工对AI的理解和应用能力,公司开展了员工培训项目。我非常期待即将进行的自我修复项目,该项目旨在将自我修复策略付诸实践。为了留住数据科学人才,埃克森美孚为员工提供接触不同应用案例的机会。在招聘数据科学家时,我关注团队的多样性,并寻找具有不同技能和背景的候选人。为了实现数据科学领域性别平衡,公司应提供平等的机会,女性数据科学家应积极争取机会并表达自己的观点。对于刚开始职业生涯或正在接受学术培训的女性数据科学家,我的建议是积累处理真实数据的项目经验,并积极表达自己的想法。 Sam Ransbotham和Sherven Kodabande:作为访谈主持,他们引导话题,提出问题,并对Sarah Karthigan的回答进行总结和评论。他们关注AI的组织方面和技术方面,以及如何引导用户接受和改进AI解决方案。

Deep Dive

Chapters
Sarah Karthigan discusses her role in leading AI strategies at ExxonMobil, focusing on self-healing IT operations and the company's commitment to providing reliable and affordable energy.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Today, we're airing an episode produced by our friends at the Modern CTO Podcast, who were kind enough to have me on recently as a guest. We talked about the rise of generative AI, what it means to be successful with technology, and some considerations for leaders to think about as they shepherd technology implementation efforts. Find the Modern CTO Podcast on Apple Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast.

and all-you-can-eat sushi buffet and artificial intelligence. How are they related? Find out today when we talk with Sarah Karthigan of ExxonMobil. Welcome to Me, Myself, and AI, a podcast on artificial intelligence in business. Each episode, we introduce you to someone innovating with AI. I'm Sam Ransbotham, professor of information systems at Boston College. I'm also the guest editor for the AI and business strategy Big Idea program at MIT Sloan Management Review.

And I'm Sherven Kodabande, senior partner with BCG, and I co-lead BCG's AI practice in North America. And together, MIT SMR and BCG have been researching AI for five years, interviewing hundreds of practitioners and surveying thousands of companies on what it takes to build and to deploy and scale AI capabilities across the organization and really transform the way organizations operate.

Today we're talking with Sarah Karthikhanen. She's the Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations Manager at ExxonMobil. Sarah, thanks for joining us. Welcome. Thanks for having me. ExxonMobil is one of the world's largest oil and gas companies, and it's existed since the 1870s, long before artificial intelligence. Sarah, can you tell us about your current role at ExxonMobil? I am currently responsible for leading the design and execution of self-healing strategies for IT operations using artificial intelligence.

And self-healing at its core is proactively monitoring, detecting, and remediating issues without human intervention. How did you end up in that role? My background is in electrical engineering, and I started Addix on mobile as a technical lead. I then went down the management career path, but one of my jobs took me up to Clinton, New Jersey, to support the corporate strategic research function.

So it is there I got exposed to data science, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. I was part of several pilots where we were assessing artificial intelligence capabilities.

This inspired me to go back to school, and I pursued my graduate certification at Harvard in data science. And one thing led to another, and I came back to Houston to take on my data science manager role. Maybe let's start with an example of a project that's maybe self-healing, maybe one of these projects. What's an example of a concrete way that you and your team have

have used artificial intelligence in a way that you couldn't have done before artificial intelligence? There are plenty of opportunities for artificial intelligence in the energy sector. But before I actually give you some examples, I think it's worthwhile to just understand the scale of operations in the energy sector, right? So kind of starting with the basics here, energy is constantly evolving. And when you think about energy, it underpins everything

every area of modern life, right? So when you think about mobility or economic prosperity or social progress, access to energy underpins all of that.

And at its core, what we do here at ExxonMobil is ensuring that we are able to offer reliable, affordable energy to the masses. So the scale of energy itself is quite unimaginable. And the data that we work with is also massive. It's big data is not new to the energy sector. So we deal with just huge volumes of data.

So without artificial intelligence, without data science, or without machine learning, you can imagine the amount of effort that goes into just processing and analyzing that data.

And with artificial intelligence, it is such a big, big, big advantage. The potential that AI carries with respect to just overall improving efficiency and cost effectiveness is huge. We also use artificial intelligence for areas where we are able to automate manual tasks, thereby improving safety and productivity.

And if we are able to get people off of harm's way, that's a huge application for artificial intelligence in the energy sector. Additionally, ExxonMobil is an energy company, but at its core, again, we are a technology company. And so we can use AI to help our scientists and engineers in their decision-making process. So we are able to augment their decision-making, connect the dots, and

and help discover insights of value to them at a much faster pace. So there are plenty of applications. My team and I, we have worked on several use cases. And again, when you think about big data, clearly you can think of potential applications of deep learning when it comes to image processing.

Now, whether that's in the front end of the value chain, you know, it can start with seismic image processing to even leak and flare detection. So we can use artificial intelligence for just, again, plenty of use cases.

So that's one side of things. You can also use artificial intelligence, and we have used it for demand sensing, for dynamic pricing, for dynamic revenue management. Also, we have used it for trading. So there's just so many different applications that my team has been involved in. So tell us a bit about self-healing. I think you mentioned building AI systems that can heal.

preempt issues or problems or errors or faults, I don't want to put words in your mouth, without human intervention. So could you give us some examples of those?

So it all starts with monitoring, right? How well can we monitor our systems, capture the right type of data, and then integrate data, which is probably sitting across silos today. It all begins with that, capturing the data and bringing it all together and integrating it so you are able to have visibility across the different silos that we have in place.

It starts with observability. And then once you have the data in place, now we are talking about how can we utilize the data? How can we analyze it? How can we teach a machine? How can we train a machine to extract insights out of that data, to look at patterns, to see what typically happens before an incident occurs?

So it is able to look for those patterns. It's able to understand the history and detect anomalies. And thereby, it is able to prompt either an end user, or you can just go ahead and close the loop out with automation altogether and kick off the necessary automations that need to happen, need to occur. So we are able to remediate the issue even before it becomes an issue. That is kind of the life cycle of self-healing.

Yeah, that's very helpful. And tell us a bit about the number of use cases, if you will. How big is this group's span of impact and work?

There are multiple groups within ExxonMobil because as you were saying, given the scale of the company, it's not possible to just centralize all of the data science capability in just one group. So we do have data scientists. We have AI engineers, machine learning engineers embedded into the different business functions. So they are able to work very closely with the business. And the opportunities, there are many.

We are working on a myriad of those use cases, and they only continue to grow. Who initiates these projects? Are these things that your group comes up with, or do business units bring them to you? What's the working relationship there? The nature of the AI project, as well as who initiates them,

It typically comes down to where a business line is in their AI adoption and utilization journey. If they are in the early stages, what you will see is typically they are looking at a few potential use cases. They are exploring a few enterprise scale opportunities. That's where it kind of starts. But

But as they continue down that maturity curve, you will notice that now we're talking about systemic introduction of AI capabilities into core businesses. We're talking about true enterprise scale opportunities. So we are able to drive data-driven decisions.

And so depending on where the business line is in their journey, that dictates the nature of the project as well as who initiates it. The more mature a business line is, the more the business lines initiate the projects themselves. What's an example of one that someone has initiated? Or can you give us just like a very specific before AI, they were doing X and then they came along and we said, hey, let's use artificial intelligence and then we can do Y. And what happened?

What's the difference? And can you give us some concretes around just one of those? I'll start with a simple example. So I touched on this earlier. ExxonMobil is a very data-rich company, right? So big data is not new to us. There's data that is locked up in salt mines. So we have huge volumes of data. In the past, some of our geoscientists and geophysicists

They had to process a lot of unstructured data pretty much manually. And they were the ones who were connecting the dots. These were the subject matter experts. So they were ingesting all of this unstructured data and they were connecting the dots and they were identifying the right place for us to go pursue.

But now with the introduction of artificial intelligence, we were able to build an intelligent system that using natural language processing that is able to ingest huge volumes of data. And we're able to train that system to look for the right type of patterns and to help augment the decisions that a geoscientist or a geophysicist would make. So that is one example of how we use machine learning insight.

I was going to ask you, Sarah, it seems like there is a large amount of human-AI collaboration that has to happen in this example that you gave, because we've got to imagine that a series of decisions that used to be performed by human experts and geologists and engineers

that is over time being sort of augmented and maybe even automatically, entirely automatically performed by AI, must have gone through a pretty robust journey to get to a level where those experts are comfortable and actually seek out the machine rather than rely on their judgment. So comment a bit about how that process happens and how you bring the

experts and the geologists and the engineers and others from the old school way to the new school way, what does that feel like? It is a journey. And it starts with, number one, understanding what is the appetite for new emerging solutions with the end user base. Because this is not just a technology challenge. This is very much a cultural challenge.

And then, of course, we make sure that we have advocates in the business before we start on any of these AI pilots, AI solutions projects.

Because ultimately, the end users need to be bought in, right? They shouldn't be fighting the solution. They should very much be the ones who are adopting those solutions and who are helping propagate the changes that this will produce. We have seen that having a very robust management of change process is crucial for the adoption of any AI solution for it to become a success. And

What we have also learned is giving the end users kind of an under-the-hood experience of what the tech actually does, what it brings, is extremely helpful. They are able to see that this is going to augment what they're doing, not going to replace them. What is their reaction? You give them this solution that does a lot of what they've been used to before. What is their reaction? How do they feel? What do they say? They actually love it when they realize that the machine is actually helping them.

And sometimes it is able to even lead them to areas that they may have not checked themselves. I've seen that the partnership goes really, really well once they understand the value that the new solution is able to bring to the table. You led actually in your response to this question with confidence.

several non-technical factors first, right? So what's your appetite? What's the openness to change?

And how badly do you want it? Which is really quite insightful because over, I think, the last 10 years, it's just been indexed so much towards the technical side of things. And then the sort of change management becomes an afterthought. And I was really energized that you actually led with the change management. Before I do anything, before I write a single line of code, how badly do you want it? I want to fall on the appetite question.

The first time I was offered sushi, my appetite for it was zero. But when somebody effectively forced me to try it, then it sort of become my food. So how do you balance that act of not forcing the end user, but also helping them understand that what they think their appetite is before they try it

is going to be different than what their appetite will be after they try it. When I first founded the group, when I had my first set of data scientists,

We actually met with quite a lot of skepticism, to your point. So there are a lot of people thinking all of this is just hype. Like, why are we doing this? Well, we know what we're doing. We have done what we do very successfully. So why do we have to change it? So when we started out, it really came down to demonstrating the art of the possible. We were knocking a lot of doors and asking people for, hey, just give us your data.

And you don't have to even engage with us because folks were at that time a little bit skeptical about the amount of time it would require on their part. And they were not necessarily ready to offer that at the get-go. So we started out with just give us your data.

And let us come back to you with what we can discover on our own and see if that is of interest to you or not. And now you have many sushi restaurants. Very much so. An all-you-can-eat buffet. So let's say that you've got these people somewhat convinced and interested, and then you start to put things into production.

How do you keep them going? How do you keep them improving? How do you keep them continuously getting better? Do you have processes around that? And if so, how is that organized? I'll tell you this much. It's been an interesting learning experience, right? Because it's one thing to go build out a model. It's one thing to go ahead and create a prototype and have everything working. But it's another thing altogether when you're trying to operationalize it.

After you operationalize AI solutions, what we have learned is, number one, to make sure that it is fully integrated into the business processes, there are several things that you have to be aware of and keep tabs on. We ensure after a solution has been operationalized that it is being monitored.

So that is extremely important. Now, we learned very quickly you cannot monitor all the features of the model. So there are some features that you have to hone in on that have the potential to disrupt to, I would say, not necessarily break the model, but it has the greatest potential to impact the predictions. So we want to hone in on those types of features and monitor them and see if a concept drift is setting in.

Because once a model moves into production, it starts degrading. That's the reality. So we need to ensure that we are keeping our eyes on the model to make sure that the predictions are still accurate, that they are still useful. We also make sure that our models are being retrained with the latest and the greatest data.

We are looking into adopting a weighting mechanism so that more recent data is weighted heavily in retraining a model than older data. And we are also looking into continuous improvement, continuous training, and continuous learning methodologies for our models. So these are some things that we do once a solution has been productized.

So within the organization, that's about how the models get better. How do you help the end users get better? You mentioned initially working with them to make sure that it's not too much resistance to even consider trying a model. That's sure even trying sushi in the first place. But

How do you get them to appreciate the finer culinary aspects? I mean, maybe for all we know, Servin's stuck on the same piece of sushi that he started with years and years ago. I mean, there's lots of other types out there. How are you growing that understanding in the user base?

We have several efforts in progress within the company where we're looking at upskilling our employees, making sure that we are able to train them on the latest and the greatest emerging technologies. So they have enough of an understanding of what AI offers, what are the potential use cases we can consider. So there's a lot of training work that is happening.

What are you excited about? I mean, what's new and what are we going to read about tomorrow that ExxonMobil is doing with artificial intelligence? What's something you're excited about, either it's a technology or a project?

What I'm really excited about and what I hope you get to read about soon is this self-healing pilot that we are gearing up to do. The self-healing pilot is looking at taking an application that is end-user facing and seeing how many of these self-healing wins we can realize in

We have been investing our time in building out the foundation, the fabric that is important to really bring this whole solution together. So now we are very much excited about testing that out and putting the strategy into action. Sarah, as you think about your own team building and cultivating and expanding that team, two questions. So what are you looking for in the candidates that you're bringing in? What are some...

technical and non-technical capabilities you're looking for? That's my first question. And number two is, how do you keep them interested and excited in data science and AI with everything that's going on and all the sort of other options out there for them? Let me kind of start with answering your second question. So how do we keep them interested?

We keep them interested by exposing them to diverse use cases. You don't have to leave the company to work on a finance problem. There are opportunities here within the company.

And so just the myriad of use cases that the data scientist gets to work on, gets to solve, is what I have found that keeps them excited, that wants them to continue their career here within the company. So that is our secret to retaining talent internally. As far as what do I look for in a candidate?

I am quite keen on diversity. I don't want a team which is an echo chamber. I specifically go seek out skills that are in adjacent areas. I have had data scientists on my team whose background is biostatistics.

I have even had people with English and political major, of course. Now, I am looking for people with data science skills too. So either they had an undergrad degree in that area, but then they also studied data science. I go seek out those types of candidates because it's extremely important to have very diverse viewpoints at the table when you are trying to solve a problem.

I'm looking for someone who's curious, who is very much interested in problem solving. And again, what excites them is challenging problems. And we're talking about a scale that is truly unimaginable. Sarah, you've been named a leader in tech. You've been named one of 25 most influential women in energy, in tech. What do you think companies could do

more of to ensure a more fair gender balance in sort of data science roles? And what do you think data scientists out there, female data scientists that are just starting their career, could be doing more of? I would say it all starts with providing equal opportunities.

I am here because I got the opportunity to demonstrate what I can do, what I'm capable of doing. Making sure that that window of opportunity is truly open for both women and men is crucial. So that's where it all starts. For an aspiring data scientist, for girls in middle school, high school, who are even considering pursuing a STEM career,

My encouragement would be, yes, absolutely, we need you. Women bring a perspective that is so different and that is extremely needed in the work environment. And especially, you know, we talked about responsible AI. It is essential.

important to have that type of a diverse perspective right from the get-go, right from building a strategy all the way to execution. It should not be an afterthought. You shouldn't try to slap on, hey, let me go ahead and make sure I address diversity and inclusion at the end. No, that's not how it works.

You start with that, and that is crucial. And women play a key role in making that happen. And what do you think women in data science who are either just starting their careers or are in their academic training, what do you think they could be doing to seek out the right opportunities for themselves? What's your advice for them? I would say that, you know, ensure you have...

really good examples of either capstone projects or experiences with internships or

co-op opportunities, whatever you want to call those experiences with companies where you have dealt with real data. I think that absolutely augments your resume. And then on top of that, once you have found that entry point into a company, just feel free to speak up and bring your solutions very vocally to the table. That's what I would say. Today, we learned a lot about

starting with the organizational aspects of an artificial intelligence chain versus the technical aspects. Learned about leading with the idea of showing people what's possible and what the potential can be from artificial intelligence. We learned about the many steps in the process of data that are fraught with peril, but organizations can overcome. And I really appreciate you taking the time to talk with us today, Sarah. Thanks for joining us. Thank you, Sarah. It's been my pleasure. Thank you.

In our next episode, we'll talk with Doug Hamilton about how NASDAQ uses AI to mitigate high-risk situations. Please join us. Thanks for listening to Me, Myself, and AI. We believe, like you, that the conversation about AI implementation doesn't start and stop with this podcast. That's why we've created a group on LinkedIn specifically for listeners like you. It's called AI for Leaders. And if you join us, you can chat with show creators and hosts, ask your own questions, share your insights,

and gain access to valuable resources about AI implementation from MIT SMR and BCG, you can access it by visiting mitsmr.com forward slash AI for Leaders. We'll put that link in the show notes and we hope to see you there.