We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode #109 The UX Design Process in the Age of AI – Where Does AI Help (and Where Does It Hurt)?

#109 The UX Design Process in the Age of AI – Where Does AI Help (and Where Does It Hurt)?

2025/4/17
logo of podcast Future of UX | Your Design, Tech and User Experience Podcast | AI Design

Future of UX | Your Design, Tech and User Experience Podcast | AI Design

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
P
Patricia Reiners
Topics
Patricia Reiners: 我认为我们都清楚,并非每一个设计流程都包含这五个阶段,而且顺序也并非一成不变。设计本身就杂乱无章。但为了方便起见,我们将遵循这五个典型阶段。尽管你当前项目的实际设计流程可能有所不同,但这完全正常。为了方便起见,我们将重点关注这五个阶段,首先是共情阶段。在这个阶段,我们希望深入了解用户、问题以及事情的来龙去脉。假设你正在进行用户体验研究或针对应用程序更新收集客户反馈。你可以使用AI驱动的观点分析工具来扫描数千条用户评论。AI会告诉你90%的评论是积极的。但当你亲自阅读时,你会看到诸如“哇,我喜欢这个新更新,每次打开它都会崩溃。干得好”之类的消息。AI将“喜欢”和“干得好”归类为积极的,但任何人都知道这是反语。因此,AI在用户研究中的应用方式是:AI驱动的工具,例如Dovetail、UX Tweak和ChatGPT,可以分析海量数据,包括服务和访谈数据。这已经非常有帮助了。AI驱动的观点分析可以检测用户反馈中的挫败感、满意度和模式。甚至聊天机器人也可以进行自动化的用户访谈以收集见解,尽管我不推荐这样做,我认为这有点棘手。因此,我们可以说:用户研究和共情阶段很大程度上是关于数据的,是关于收集大量信息。AI真正擅长的是组织、分析和综合数据并从中找到意义,这需要大量时间。因此,AI在这方面非常出色。AI在用户体验研究中不太擅长或存在风险的地方是什么呢?首先,有时AI会误解内容,无法完全掌握语气、讽刺或隐藏的情绪。当你想到定性用户访谈时,所说的话背后有很多东西。例如,当某人做出某种印象时,你会看到他们的反应方式,他们实际上并非如此。所说的话和所做的事情之间存在巨大差异。尤其是在可用性测试中,看到用户界面、用户点击的位置以及定性访谈非常重要,用户点击某个按钮或做错了什么。对于AI来说,分析视频仍然非常困难,因为它只能分析文本,这使得建立联系变得非常困难。另一个风险是AI只擅长其训练数据。如果训练数据存在偏差,那么见解也会存在偏差。对于每一个AI产品来说,情况都是如此。同理心不仅仅是识别模式,更是关于人际连接。因此,共情阶段的关键结论是:AI可以处理用户数据,但真正的同理心来自于人与人之间的互动。AI在研究方面是一个很棒的伙伴,但它永远、永远、永远不会取代真实的互动和反馈。我认为这一点非常重要,我再怎么强调都不为过。虽然有合成用户或注意力洞察之类的工具,但这都很好。我的意思是,如果你想使用它们,那就用吧,如果它对你有帮助,如果你无法进行用户研究,但要将那里的见解作为假设,而不是基于事实的信息。你需要在某个时候验证这些信息。让我们转到下一个阶段,定义阶段。AI能否帮助将数据转化为真正的见解?首先,定义阶段是关于综合所有用户研究见解并真正理解所有这些信息。此时,你拥有大量用户研究、反馈、数据和可用性测试。有一些工具非常有帮助。想想Miro、FigJam或Notion AI、ChatGPT、Perplexity AI、Cloud AI,它们可以帮助你总结数据、提出建议、总结、帮助你对见解进行分类,然后提出一些建议。例如,用户发现结账流程令人困惑。用户希望应用程序提供更多个性化设置。这看起来不错且有帮助,但有时会出现一些问题,因为用户体验设计师不仅要定义问题,还要深入研究隐藏的需求。因此,为了正确使用AI,至关重要的是不要提示AI说“你的建议是什么?”然后出现示例。你只是发现结账流程令人困惑。这很好,但为什么?我们需要理解为什么。不是说他们觉得它令人困惑,而是什么导致了这种困惑?问题是什么?他们在哪里迷路了?因此,AI可能会总结说用户想要个性化设置,但人类研究人员需要发现用户实际上是被过多的选择压垮了。这基本上需要人类进行批判性思考。AI也可以帮助你定义用户体验问题。AI可以将这些大量数据组织成非常清晰的主题。它可以将其分类为痛点、需求和目标。或者你可以使用我之前提到的AI生成的热图来预测用户将把注意力集中在哪里。你可以这样做,但同样,这是一个你仍然需要在某个时候验证的假设。或者AI可以处理调查结果并大规模提取模式。这非常有帮助,尤其是在你拥有大量数据的情况下。因此,AI在定义阶段失败的地方,AI不会问为什么。它只会发现过去行为中的模式,它不会问为什么。AI可能会强化现有偏见,而不是发现新的见解。一些用户体验问题可以通过数据来定义,但直觉起着巨大的作用。定义阶段的关键结论是什么?AI是组织见解的绝佳助手。但我们仍然需要人类,我们永远都需要。需要定义真正问题的人,对所有事情都有批判性洞察力的人,并得出真正深入的结论,询问原因,并可能发现研究中存在某些差距,以及仍然需要回答的某些问题。让我们转到第三部分,即构思阶段。提出功能、新想法和头脑风暴。AI可以发挥创造力。AI在头脑风暴、提出想法和新内容方面确实非常出色。它有多新颖是另一个问题,但它肯定能提出想法。这非常有帮助,我强烈建议使用AI,尤其是在头脑风暴阶段,你已经掌握了所有见解,你已经定义了你的问题陈述,你真正了解了这一切,你有了你的研究见解,你理解了问题,你已经对解决方案有了一些感觉,然后使用AI进行头脑风暴,然后对不同的想法进行优先排序,然后将其转化为功能。对于这个阶段,我强烈推荐使用ChatGPT、Perplexity AI等大型语言模型。构思很大程度上是关于内容的。它不是关于可视化内容。我的意思是,当然你可以,但大型语言模型最适合这些阶段。我认为AI在整个构思过程中失败的一些地方是:它可以根据过去的设计和产品预测或推荐某些功能。有时它不会创造出完全新的东西,或者它会过于疯狂。我的建议和推荐是,当你开始提示语言模型时,要非常精确。你已经提到了目标群体、见解和问题陈述。你提供的细节越多,功能就越好。然后不要忘记迭代。不要使用第一个想法,而是迭代、迭代、迭代,对它们进行优先排序,对这些想法进行分类,然后将其作为起点。你知道,你不需要从空白页面开始。好的,现在让我们来谈谈本集的赞助商,Wix Studio。网页设计师们,让我们来谈谈“C”字——创意倦怠。你的客户方拥有真正的投资组合潜力,但在资源、反馈、有限的预算和越来越紧张的截止日期之间,它根本无法实现。Wix Studio帮助弥补了这一差距。它专为代理机构和企业而构建,你可以将自己的愿景变为现实,并通过无代码动画、大量AI工具、可重复使用的设计资产和高级布局工具来保持其活力。对于你的下一个项目,请访问wixstudio.com。这是wixstudio.com。因为一个很大的问题是,有时AI生成的想法缺乏用户背景,因此它们需要人工改进或在提示中提供良好的信息。是的,这绝对是我推荐的内容。构思阶段的关键结论是:ChatGPT,所有大型语言模型在头脑风暴和构思方面都很出色。但对你来说,至关重要的是,首先要正确地提示语言模型。因此,提供足够的背景信息,然后检查内容,对它们进行优先排序,并将其作为起点。让我们转到第四步,原型设计阶段。AI是否使设计速度更快?我认为它绝对做到了。原型设计是什么样的?通常,原型设计阶段是关于可视化你的想法或你提出的概念。也许你已经有一些功能想法,并且你想对其进行原型设计,以便在下一阶段进行测试或将其展示给利益相关者。原型设计对于帮助人们理解功能、产品和想法的外观以及对其进行测试非常重要。AI可以提供很大的帮助。有像Galileo AI、Vizilli、Relume这样的出色工具,它们可以帮助你仅通过简单的提示创建小型原型。我的建议是,这也是我在研讨会或与客户一起使用这些工具时看到的,它们还无法创建视觉上完美的成果。因此,AI工具会向你展示的是一个非常粗略的草稿,一个很好的起点,我认为这是与你的团队开始讨论、与客户分享、甚至进行第一次测试的最佳起点。但不要指望它完美无缺,因为它不会完美无缺。我认为对AI原型设计抱有正确的期望是好的。另一件非常重要的事情是,当你提示AI工具创建线框图、创建设计时,不要含糊其辞,因为它们无法做到,它们不知道。在你提示这些工具之前,想想这个功能是什么样的。使用另一个大型语言模型,例如ChatGPT,进行头脑风暴。好的,我想设计一个新的搜索功能,一个用于在预订系统中查找完美航班的搜索区域,我需要什么?我需要什么功能?好的,我需要一些东西来输入日期,可能我需要一些东西来输入机场、到达和出发机场,也许我需要一个过滤器,也许我需要我想携带的人、我想携带的人、任何我想添加的服务。因此,你已经考虑过你想包含哪些不同的组件。要非常具体。否则,你会得到一些非常随机的东西,一些毫无意义的东西。这就是我看到很多人不幸做错的事情,然后他们对结果非常沮丧。这也是这些工具略显不足的地方。它们可能感觉非常通用,缺乏个性,但你越了解你想要什么,你就能越好地提示AI。不要指望AI为你做所有工作。这绝对行不通。原型设计阶段的关键结论是:AI可以加快设计速度,但设计师必须首先定义他们实际想要在原型中包含什么,它是什么样的,以及他们需要如何有条理地测试想法。当你认为AI会抢走你的工作,因为有很多工具已经可以设计和创建视觉上漂亮的东西时,不会,因为它们不知道你实际上想用这个原型表达什么。你的目标是什么?你不是为了好玩才这样做。你这样做是为了向利益相关者展示某个想法,进行一些测试。你有一些问题,你希望通过原型得到答案。好的,现在让我们进入最后一个阶段,测试阶段。测试是使用原型、假设和假设,并使用真实用户进行测试,也可以使用AI进行测试。但通常情况下,两者结合是最好的。有一些AI驱动的可用性测试工具,例如Amaze和Lookback,它们会在你进行真实测试之前预测用户行为。这可能会有所帮助。你可以这样做。它们提供某些基于AI的眼动追踪工具,模拟用户首先会看哪里。我已经提到了Attention Insights工具,它可以根据AI对用户注视位置的预测创建热图,或者AI可以自动化调查和基于聊天的反馈。这都很好。这都可能很棒,但仍然需要进行真实的测试。AI绝对失败的一些领域:AI测试是预测性的,而不是真实的。因此,它没有考虑人类的情感。也许你已经看到,当你有一个阴影设计或进行热图测试时。有时,我认为对我来说,看到人们实际上在看什么地方也很吸引人。这不是你可以预测的事情。这与层次结构无关。有时人们会因为某个词、某个符号或其他什么原因而关注某些东西。因此,你始终需要使用真实用户进行测试。AI无法像人类观察那样真正衡量细微的挫败感或喜悦感。测试阶段的关键结论是:AI有助于进行初步测试,即在真实测试之前进行的一些测试,以便基本上有一些想法,更多的假设,但仍然需要进行真实世界的可用性测试。在粗略地浏览了设计流程并了解了我们如何在何处实施设计之后,我们看到AI根本没有取代你的用户体验设计,而是在重塑它。对我们来说,了解我们可以在哪里使用AI、我们在哪里产生最大的影响、我们如何在何处真正加快流程非常重要。因为有很多方面AI实际上比人类要好得多。例如所有重复性工作、所有自动化工作、所有数据、生成想法。因此,我们可以更多地关注人类技能,真正的同理心、创造力、决策能力。这仍然来自人类,深入研究这些主题非常重要。顺便说一句,如果你想了解更多关于如何在你的设计流程中深入整合AI的信息,请务必注册AI for Designers 2.0自定进度版本课程,并在说明中找到链接。本课程将帮助你保持最新状态,让你快速掌握AI工具。如果你感到不知所措,如果你不知道如何使用它们,如果你仍然觉得每天都会出现新的工具,我不知道从哪里开始。这是你的课程,我强烈推荐你参加。这是对你的未来最好的投资。AI已经到来,我们可以选择抵制它或战略性地使用它。因此,对我们来说,重要的是真正了解AI如何在何处发挥作用,以及如何使用它来成为更好的用户体验设计师。非常感谢你的收听。如果你想联系我们,你可以在Instagram上找到我们。你可以在LinkedIn上找到我们。给我们发消息。请与我们联系。请打个招呼。如果你有任何问题,随时联系我们。我很高兴认识你,和你聊聊天。非常感谢你的收听。我想说,我们将来再见。

Deep Dive

Chapters
This chapter explores the use of AI in the empathize phase of UX design. AI tools can analyze large datasets, but they struggle with nuances like sarcasm and hidden emotions, highlighting the irreplaceable value of human interaction in understanding user needs. Empathy requires human connection, which AI cannot replicate.
  • AI excels at analyzing large datasets and identifying patterns in user feedback.
  • AI struggles with interpreting nuances like sarcasm and hidden emotions.
  • Human interaction remains crucial for genuine empathy and understanding user needs.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Hello friends and welcome to the future of UX, the podcast where we explore the trends, the challenges and everything that's shaping the future of design. I'm Patricia Reiners and in each episode we dive into the intersection of UX, technology and the future so you can stay ahead of the curve. Today we are tackling a question that's on, I would say, every designer's mind at the moment.

AI is changing how we work, but does it enhance or undermine the UX design process? UX is human-centered by nature, but AI isn't human. So how do these two things coexist?

We will talk about how or can AI truly understand users and their needs? Can AI generated designs replace creative thinking? And is AI making the UX process faster and better or less thoughtful?

In this episode, we will break down the five phases of the UX design process, emphasize, define, ideate, prototype and test and look at each one of them and do a little deep dive in how AI is or can be used in each state, where AI is actually useful and where it's risky and how designers should adapt to keep UX truly human-centered. I would say let's dive right in.

Let's get started with the very first phase: Emphasize. Can I really understand users? And maybe a quick disclaimer:

I think we all know that not every single design process consists of these five stages in the certain order. Design is messy, design is chaotic. But just to make it a little bit easier, we will go through those typical five stages. Although your design process for the project that you're currently working on might look a little bit different, this is totally normal. Just to make it a little bit easier,

We will focus on those five stages and we will get started with the emphasize phase. So the phase where we really want to understand. We go broad. We want to understand the user. We want to understand the problem. We want to see what this is all about. And imagine you're running a UX research study or a customer feedback for an app update.

You decide to use an AI-powered sentiment analysis tool to scan thousands of user reviews. AI tells you that 90% of the comments are positive. But when you read them yourself, you see messages like, Wow, love that this new update crashes every time I open it. Great job.

So AI saw love and great job classified as positive, but any human would know this was sarcasm. So how AI is being used in user research. AI powered tools like Dovetail, UX Tweak, ChatGPT can analyze massive amounts of data. It can be services, it can be interview data. This is already super helpful.

AI-driven sentiment analysis detects frustration, also satisfaction, and patterns in user feedback. And even chatbots can conduct automated user interviews to gather insights, although I wouldn't recommend this, so I think this is a bit tricky. So what we can already say is: User research and emphasizing is a lot about data, gathering a lot of information.

And what AI is really good at is structuring, analyzing, synthesizing the data and making sense of it, which takes a lot of time. So AI is wonderful at that. What is AI not so good at or what are the risks of AI in UX research? First of all, sometimes AI misinterprets contents and it can't fully grasp the tones and sarcasm or hidden emotions.

When you think about qualitative user interviews, there's a lot happening behind what's being said. For example, when someone, you know, just makes a certain impression and you see just like the way how they react, that they actually don't mean it that way. And there's a huge difference between what people are saying and what people are doing. And especially when it comes to like usability tests or where it's really important that you

have that you also see the interface so where the user is clicking on you have this qualitative interview and the user is clicking on a certain button or it does something wrong so for AI it's still very difficult to analyze basically the video because it can't analyze the video it can only analyze the transcript makes then become like the connection very difficult another risk is that AI is only good at it

as its training data. So if the training data is biased, the insights will be too. And this is the case for every AI product. And empathy isn't just about recognizing patterns, it's about human connection. So the key takeaway here for the emphasize phase is AI can process user data, but real empathy comes from human to human interaction.

AI is a wonderful companion when it comes to research, but it will never, never, never, never replace real user interaction and real user feedback. And I think this is super important and I can't stress that enough. Although there are tools like synthetic users or attention insights, that's all great. I mean, if you want to use them, use them if it's helpful, if you don't have access to user research, but use the insights there as hypothesis, as assumptions.

and not as fact-based information. So you need to validate these information at some point. Let's move to the next phase, define. Can AI help turn data into real insights? First of all, the define phase is all about synthesizing all the insights from the user research and really trying to make sense of all of that. At that point, you have a messy collection of user research, of feedback, of data, of usability tests.

And there are some tools that are super helpful. Thinking about Miro, thinking about FigJam or Notion AI or ChatGPT, Perplexity AI, Cloud AI will help you to summarize the data and help you to come up with suggestions, come up with summaries, help you to categorize the insights and then suggest something. For example, users find this checkout process confusing. Users want more personalization in the app.

That seems right and helpful, but sometimes there's a little bit of a problem because UX designers don't just define the problems. They also look deeper into the hidden needs. So for us also to use AI correctly, it's super important to not prompt the AI to say like, what are your suggestions? And then things come up as the example. You just find the checkout process confusing.

That's wonderful, but like why? We need to understand why. Not that they find it confusing, but what caused these confusions? What is the problem? Where did they get lost? So AI might summarize that users want personalization, but a human researcher, a human being needs to uncover that users actually feel overwhelmed by too many choices. So this basically critical thinking needs to be done by a human.

AI can also help you define the UX problems. AI can organize these large amounts of data into very clear themes. It can categorize it into pain points, into needs, into goals. Or you can use, as I already mentioned, AI-generated heat maps and predict where users will focus their intention. You can do that, but again, this is an assumption that you still need to validate at some point.

Or AI can process survey results and extract patterns at scale. This is super helpful, especially if you have large amounts of data. So where AI fails, especially in the defined phase, AI doesn't ask why. It only finds patterns in past behavior and it can't ask why. And AI might reinforce existing biases instead of uncovering new insights.

Some UX problems can be defined by data alone, but intuition plays a huge, huge role. So what is the key takeaway for the defined phase? AI is an amazing helper, an amazing assistant in organizing insights. But we still need this human being, and we will always do.

who needs to define the real problem, who have this critical oversight over everything and draws real conclusions that really go deep, that ask why and maybe, you know, sees where there are certain gaps in the research, where there are still certain questions that needs to be answered. Let's move to part number three, which is ideation. So coming up with features, with new ideas and brainstorming.

AI can be creative. AI actually really shines when it comes to brainstorming ideas and brainstorming features and coming up with new content. I mean, how new it is, is another question, but definitely coming up with ideas.

And this is super helpful and I can highly, highly recommend to use AI, especially in the brainstorming part where you have all the insights, where you have your problem statement defined, where you really know what this is all about, where you have your research insights, you understand the problem, where you get a sense of the solution already and then use AI to brainstorm and then also to prioritize the different ideas and then transfer this into features maybe.

And for this stage, I can highly recommend tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity AI, so all the large language models. Ideation is very much about

content. So it's not so much about like visualizing content. I mean, of course you could, but the large language models are the best ones for especially those faces. A few things that I think where I falls or fails a little bit in the entire ideation process

It can predict certain features or can recommend certain features based on past designs, based on other products.

And sometimes it doesn't create something entirely new or it goes too crazy. And my tip and recommendation is there to be also when you come to prompting the language model, be very, very precise. So you already mentioned the target group, the insights, the problem statement. So the more details you already give there, the better the features are. And then don't forget to iterate.

So don't use the first ideas, but iterate, iterate, iterate, prioritize them, categorize these ideas, then use this as a starting point. You know, so you don't need to start with a blank page. Okay, so now let's come to this episode's sponsor, Wix Studio. Web designers, let's talk about the C word, creative burnout.

Your client side has real portfolio potential, but between resourcing, feedback, end-tied budgets, and ever-tidier deadlines, it just doesn't make the cut. Wix Studio helps close that gap. Built for agencies and enterprises, you can bring your own vision to life and keep it alive with no-code animations, tons of AI tools, reusable design assets, and advanced layout tools. For your next project, check out wixstudio.com

That's wixstudio.com. Because a really big problem is that sometimes AI generated ideas lack the user context, so they need human refinement or really good information in the prompt. And yeah, this is definitely something that I would recommend. So the key takeaway for the ideation phase: ChatGPT, all loud language models are great when it comes to brainstorming about ideation.

But for you, it's super important to first of all prompt the language model the right way. So give adequate background information and then also double check the content, prioritize them and use this as a starting point.

Let's move to our step number four, which is prototyping. Does AI make designing much faster? I would say it definitely does. So how does prototyping look like? Generally, the prototyping phase is about visualizing your ideas or the concept that you came up with. Maybe you already got some feature ideas and you would like to prototype them to maybe even test it in the next phase or to present it to a stakeholder.

Prototyping is very important to help people to understand how the feature, how the product, how the idea looks like and also to test it. And AI can be very helpful. There are wonderful tools like Galileo AI or Vizilli, Relume. Many, many amazing tools that help you to basically to create a mini prototype

with just a simple prompt. My tip here is, and also what I'm seeing, you know, using these tools in workshops or with clients, is that they are not at a point where they can create visually perfect results.

So what AI tools will present you is a very first draft, a wonderful starting point that is, I think, the best starting point to start a discussion with your team, to share this with clients, do some first testings maybe even. But don't expect it to be perfect because it won't. It won't be. And I think it's good to have the right expectation when it comes to AI prototyping.

Another really important thing is when you prompt AI tools to create via frames, to create designs, don't be abstract because they can't, they have no idea. Before you prompt these tools, think about how the feature already looks like. Use another large language model like ChatGPT, for example, to brainstorm. Okay, I want to design a new search feature

search area for finding the perfect flight in a booking system what do I need what kind of functions do I need okay I need something like to put in the date probably I need something to enter the airport the arrival the departure airport maybe I need a filter maybe I need

Pads that I want to bring, people that I want to bring, any kind of like services I want to add. So you already think about like what are the different components that you would like to have included. So be very specific. Otherwise, you will get something very random and something that doesn't really make sense. And this is what I'm seeing what a lot of people unfortunately doing wrong and then they are super frustrated with the results.

Then this is also the problem where these tools fall a little bit short. They can feel very generic, they lack personality, but the better you know what you want, the better you can prompt the AI. Don't expect you to do the AI, like do AI or let AI do all the work for you. This is definitely not going to work. The key takeaway for the prototyping phase is AI can accelerate design, but designers must

First of all, define what they actually want in the prototype, how it would look like, and what they need to test ideas thoughtfully. So when you think that AI is going to take your job because there are so many tools that can already design and create visually beautiful things,

No, because they don't know what you actually want to get across with this prototype. What's your goal? You don't do this for fun. You do this to present a certain idea to a stakeholder, to do some testing. You have certain questions that you would like to have answers with the prototype.

Okay, now let's move to our last phase, the testing phase. Testing is using the prototype, using the assumption, the hypothesis and testing this with real users, also tested with AI. But a combination is usually the best.

There are AI powered usability testing tools like Amaze, like Lookback, and they predict user behavior before you do the real tests. This can be helpful. You can do that. And they offer certain AI based eye tracking tools, simulate where users will look first.

I already mentioned the tool Attention Insights, which create heat maps based on AI prediction of where the user will look at or AI can automate surveys and chatbot-based feedback. This is all wonderful. This can all be great, but still real testing is definitely needed.

Some areas where AI absolutely fails: AI testing is predictive and not real. So it doesn't account for human emotions. And maybe you have seen that when you had a shader design or when you did like a heatmap testing.

Sometimes I think also for me, it's fascinating to see where people are actually looking at. And this is not something that you can predict. It's not something about hierarchy. Sometimes people are looking at something because of a certain word, because of a certain sign, because of something. So you always need to test with real users. And AI can't really measure the subtle frustration or delight as well as human observations.

So the key takeaway for the testing phase is AI helps with preliminary testing, so something that you do before the real testing to basically have some thoughts, more hypothesis, but real-world usability testing is still necessary. So after going roughly through the design process and seeing how and where we can implement design, we are seeing that AI is not replacing your X design at all, but it's reshaping it.

And for us, it's so important to understand where exactly can we use AI? Where do we make the biggest impact? How and where do we actually speed up the process? Because there are so many ways where AI is actually much better than humans are. Like all the repetition, all the automation, all the data, generating ideas.

And so we can focus much more on like the human skills, real empathy, creativity, decision making. This still comes from human and it's very important to really dive deep into those topics.

By the way, if you would learn more about how to deeply incorporate AI in your design process, make sure to sign up for the AI for Designers 2.0 self-paced version and find the link in the description course. This course helps you to stay up to date, to really get you up to speed with the AI tools. So if you feel a bit overwhelmed, if you don't know how to use them, if

If you still feel like every day there's a new tool coming out, I don't know where to start. This is your course and highly recommend to participate. This is the best investment in your future. AI is here to stay and we can either boycott it or use it very strategically. So for us, it's important to really understand how and where AI can make a difference and how you can use it to become a better UX designer.

Thank you so much for listening. If you would like to connect, you can find us on Instagram. You can find us on LinkedIn. Shoot us a message. Please connect. Please say hi. And if you have any questions, always feel free to reach out. I'm super happy to get to know you, to have a little chat. And thank you so much for listening. I would say see you in the future.

you