Humans have a natural curiosity but also a compulsive desire to avoid complexity, fear, and moral implications of knowing too much. This internal struggle is driven by the overwhelming nature of information, fear for personal safety, and the dread of ethical responsibilities, such as complicity in global issues like climate change.
Information overload makes it difficult for individuals to focus on what truly matters. The constant flood of real-time information from around the world creates a sense of being overwhelmed, leading people to withdraw and seek ways to filter out noise, often resulting in a desire to tune out or remain ignorant.
People idealize the past as simpler due to the overwhelming complexity and rapid changes in the present. This idealization is a coping mechanism to escape the moral exhaustion of dealing with modern problems. It often leads to a nostalgic view of the past as a time of clearer choices and simpler lives, which can fuel political reactions on both the left and right.
The 'city on a hill' metaphor, rooted in biblical context, symbolizes a standard of democracy and opportunity that many Americans aspire to. However, this desire often comes with an unwillingness to acknowledge the country's historical and present failings, reflecting a tension between high moral expectations and the reality of societal imperfections.
In ancient times, democracy was viewed as the worst political regime, associated with mob rule and the rise of populist tyrants. Over time, democracy gained a more optimistic reputation, but modern expectations have inflated its perceived capabilities. Democracy is good at certain things but not others, and understanding its limitations is crucial for realistic self-assessment.
Self-knowledge helps individuals navigate uncertainty by understanding their own capacities and limitations. It allows people to filter out unnecessary information, focus on what truly matters, and avoid forming uninformed opinions. This self-awareness is essential for maintaining balance and making meaningful decisions in an age of information overload.
The idealization of childhood innocence can harm children by keeping them ignorant of the world's complexities. Overprotecting children from knowledge, such as sexual education or societal dangers, can leave them unprepared for real-world challenges. Children need gradual exposure to the world to develop into responsible adults, rather than being shielded from it entirely.
Ignorance drives scientific progress by compelling researchers to question existing knowledge and seek new truths. Scientific results are always tentative, and the recognition of ignorance motivates the pursuit of better understanding. This approach fosters a culture of curiosity and continuous improvement in the sciences.
Young people can navigate constant connectivity by turning inward to develop self-awareness and understanding of their own values. Reducing reliance on social media for validation and seeking meaningful experiences through books, introspection, and real-world interactions can help them find balance and inner peace.
Self-awareness is necessary for moral responsibility, but excessive self-knowledge can lead to paralysis. Ethical action often requires the belief that one is fully in control of their actions, even though this belief may be partially false. Balancing self-awareness with the ability to act decisively is key to maintaining moral agency.
“Aristotle taught that all human beings want to know,” writes Columbia professor of humanities Mark Lilla, adding that “our own experience teaches us that all human beings also want not to know, sometimes fiercely so.” We’ll talk to Lilla about our innate disposition toward ignorance – whether about a political reality or an uncomfortable family secret. Lilla’s new book is “Ignorance and Bliss: On Wanting Not to Know.”
Guests:
**Mark Lilla, **professor of the humanities, department of history, Columbia University; http://marklilla.com/