We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Trump Threatens Elon Musk

Trump Threatens Elon Musk

2025/6/10
logo of podcast Elon Musk Podcast

Elon Musk Podcast

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
W
Will Walden
Topics
Will Walden: 我讨论了美国总统唐纳德·特朗普威胁私人公民埃隆·马斯克的事件。特朗普直接威胁马斯克,如果他资助特朗普反对的政治候选人,将会面临非常严重的后果。这一威胁并非通过泄露或秘密信息传递,而是特朗普在接受NBC记者克里斯汀·韦尔克的电话采访时直接说出的。 特朗普的威胁并非含糊其辞。他在周四的一篇帖子中暗示,为了节省预算,他将取消马斯克公司获得的联邦合同和补贴。这则帖子是在马斯克公开批评共和党最新的预算法案,并呼吁在2026年投票罢免现任议员之后发布的。马斯克还提出了组建一个新的政党来代表中间80%人口的想法。特朗普几天后回应,警告说如果马斯克在中期选举中支持民主党候选人,他将遭受未指明的后果。总统没有解释这些后果是什么,但他坚称这些后果将“非常严重”。 马斯克在2024年选举周期中至少捐赠了2.88亿美元,以支持特朗普和其他共和党人。这笔款项使他成为去年共和党圈中最有影响力的财政支持者。他突然威胁要将支持从共和党转移,或者可能资助第三方或民主党候选人,这引发了特朗普的警告升级。特朗普传递的信息是,忠诚是交易性的,改变立场会带来惩罚。 特朗普的策略甚至让一些政治盟友感到不安。联邦补贴在维持马斯克公司的运营中发挥了重要作用。SpaceX通过NASA合同获得数十亿美元,而特斯拉则受益于与其电动汽车相关的能源税收抵免和税收优惠。取消这些补贴将对运营、投资者和就业产生切实的影响。这一威胁直接针对埃隆·马斯克及其财务和业务。在与捐助者的私人讨论中,特朗普强调了他对交易性政治的偏好。知情人士表示,特朗普认为财务忠诚是他政治机器的基石。这使得马斯克的异议在特朗普看来异常危险。马斯克曾吹嘘自己是言论自由绝对主义者,但他发现自己陷入了在维护政治独立性和为他和他的公司保留政府资源之间的两难境地。 除了个人恩怨之外,科技公司首席执行官和联邦官员也正在经历一个新的政策影响时代,在这个时代,准入和资金越来越依赖于个人关系,而不是传统的游说或价值。特朗普政府似乎正在进行握手交易。马斯克在特朗普执政期间享有影响力,包括友好的会面和有利的公开评论,以及住在特朗普的庄园里。现在这种影响力已经完全消失了。其他科技领导者认为这是一个填补空白的机会。Palantir和Endreal等公司正在增加联邦游说力度,给予更多资金,并将自己定位为马斯克的替代者。Meta的领导层也改变了其政治立场。 马斯克的失误可能为特朗普的新宠儿出现创造空间。马斯克在硅谷的地位已经开始受到他反复无常的公开声明和不一致的商业重点的影响。失去特朗普的青睐可能会进一步孤立他,特别是如果他的企业帝国成为特朗普政府审查的目标。特朗普与马斯克之间的不和的一个后果是美国太空政策的潜在变化。SpaceX目前主导着政府卫星发射和太空物流。如果联邦机构开始将合同转向杰夫·贝佐斯的太空企业蓝色起源,那么蓝色起源可能会从中受益。NASA正在探索多样化发射供应商的方法,以应对与SpaceX等单一供应商依赖相关的政治风险。Sam Altman也将从政治影响中受益。Altman通过将一个大型数据中心倡议重新定位为联邦基础设施项目,并在特朗普就职后不久获得了一次白宫合影机会,从而在政府内部赢得了信誉,而没有引起马斯克式的争议。 其他科技领导人的沉默说明了很多问题。许多高管暗自希望马斯克离开特朗普的核心圈子将缓解政策谈判,并为他们的公司创造一个更可预测的商业环境。特朗普政府对待马斯克的态度揭示了特朗普如何看待权力和忠诚,以及他如何将财富和影响力视为有用的工具,当它们服务于他的政治目标时,以及当它们不再服务于他时,就视为负债。马斯克帮助推动了2024年的共和党竞选,但在2026年,这可能不足以保护他不受唐纳德·特朗普的报复。特朗普的信息非常直白:你可以资助反对派,但那会让你付出代价。

Deep Dive

Chapters
Donald Trump directly threatened Elon Musk with unspecified but "very serious" consequences if he funds political candidates Trump opposes. This followed public disagreements and Musk's criticism of the GOP budget and suggestion of a new political party. Trump's threat included the potential cutting off of federal contracts and subsidies to Musk's companies.
  • Trump threatened Musk with consequences for opposing political candidates.
  • The threat was delivered directly during a phone interview.
  • Trump suggested cutting off federal contracts and subsidies.

Shownotes Transcript

This episode is brought to you by State Farm. Knowing you could be saving money for the things you really want is a great feeling. Talk to a State Farm agent today to learn how you can choose to bundle and save with a personal price plan. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there. Prices are based on rating plans that vary by state. Coverage options are selected by the customer. Availability, amount of discounts and savings, and eligibility vary by state.

The Hoover Dam wasn't built in a day. And the GMC Sierra lineup wasn't built overnight. Like every American achievement, building the Sierra 1500 heavy-duty and EV was the result of dedication. A dedication to mastering the art of engineering. That's what this country has done for 250 years.

and what GMC has done for over 100. We are professional grade. Visit GMC.com to learn more. Assembled in Flint and Hamtramck, Michigan and Fort Wayne, Indiana of U.S. and globally sourced parts. Your ultimate authority for daily Elon Musk news. Exploring the world's biggest ideas with your host, Will Walden. There's something new every day. The president of the United States has just threatened a private citizen.

Donald Trump told Elon Musk to expect very serious consequences if he funds political candidates that Trump opposes. Now, this threat didn't come through a leak or some sort of back-channel message. It came directly from the president himself during a phone interview with NBC's Kristen Welker. Now, that message followed a series of public jabs between the two men, revealing a larger question. What happens when the president, Donald Trump,

threatens to retaliate against a private citizen for political donations. Trump's threat wasn't vague, though. In a Thursday post, he suggested cutting off federal contracts and subsidies to Musk's companies as a budget-saving measure. That post followed Musk's public criticism of the GOP's latest budget legislation and his call to vote out incumbents in 2026.

Elon also floated the idea of launching a new political party to represent the 80% in the middle. Trump responded within days, warning that if Musk backs Democratic candidates in the midterms, he'll suffer unspecified consequences. Now, the president didn't explain what those would be, but insisted they'd be very serious.

Now, Musk donated at least $288 million to support Trump and other Republicans during the 2024 election cycle, according to campaign finance reports. That sum made him the most influential financial backer in GOP circles last year. Now, his abrupt threat to redirect support away from the party or possibly fund third party or Democratic candidates has triggered Donald Trump's escalated warnings. Now, the message that Donald Trump is sending is...

is that loyalty is transactional and switching sides comes with penalties. Trump's tactics have created unease even among some of his political allies. Federal subsidies have played a major role in sustaining Musk's company. SpaceX receives billions through NASA contracts and Tesla benefits from energy credits and tax incentives tied to its EVs.

Cutting those off would have tangible effects on operations, investors, and jobs. The threat was targeted directly at Elon Musk and his finances and his businesses. In private discussions with donors, Trump has emphasized his preference for transactional politics. Sources familiar with the situation say that Trump views financial loyalty as a cornerstone of his political machine.

That makes Musk's dissent unusually dangerous in Trump's view. Musk, who once boasted of being a free speech absolutist, has found himself caught between asserting political independence and preserving access to government resources for him and also his companies. Now, the dynamic matters to everybody, but

Beyond personal grudges, tech CEOs and federal officials are always navigating a new era of policy influence right now, where access and funding increasingly depend on personal relationships rather than traditional lobbying or merit. It looks like handshake deals are happening throughout Trump's administration. Musk had enjoyed a period of influence under Trump

including friendly meetings and favorable public comments, staying at Trump's estates. Now that influence is completely gone. It's evaporated. Other tech leaders see this as an opportunity to fill the void, though. Executives at companies like Palantir and Endreal, both heavily defense-focused, see a pathway to gain favor with the administration.

Industry sources say these firms are already increasing the federal lobbying efforts, giving more and more money and positioning themselves as alternative to Elon Musk. Now, Meta's leadership has also shifted its political tone.

This episode is brought to you by Amazon Prime. From streaming to shopping, Prime helps you get more out of your passions. So whether you're a fan of true crime or prefer a nail-biting novel from time to time, with services like Prime Video, Amazon Music, and fast, free delivery, Prime makes it easy to get more out of whatever you're into or getting into. Visit Amazon.com slash Prime to learn more.

Aligning more closely with Trump's rhetoric in recent months, Musk's misstep could create room for new favorites of Trump to emerge. Musk's standing in Silicon Valley had already begun to erode due to his erratic public statements and inconsistent business focuses recently. And while respected for engineering successes and managing Tesla and SpaceX, he has frustrated partners and investors with unpredictable behavior and unkept promises.

And losing Trump's favor could further isolate him, especially if his corporate empire becomes a target of scrutiny for Trump's administration. One consequence of this feud is a potential change in U.S. space policy. SpaceX currently dominates government satellite launches and space logistics. If federal agencies begin to shift contracts toward Blue Origin, who's Jeff Bezos' space venture, it could benefit handsomely.

Sources familiar with NASA's current contract review process say the agency is exploring ways to diversify launch providers in light of political risks associated with single-vendor dependency such as SpaceX. OpenAI, who, of course, Elon has been warring with for a while, Sam Altman stands to benefit from the political fallout as well.

Although Altman has his own ongoing feud with Elon Musk, he has navigated the post-election power structure with more discretion. He repurposed a large-scale data center initiative as a federal infrastructure project and secured a White House photo op shortly after Trump's inauguration. His strategy earned him credibility inside the administration without attracting Musk-style controversy. Now,

The silence from other tech leaders speaks volumes here. Most prefer to avoid choosing sides in a political feud that could affect federal contracts, antitrust actions, or export licenses. Many executives are quietly hopeful that Musk's departure from Trump's inner circle will ease policy negotiations and create a more predictable business environment for their companies.

Now the administration's treatment of Musk reveals how Trump views power and loyalty, sees wealth and influence as useful tools when they serve his political goals and as liabilities when they don't serve him anymore. Musk helped fuel the Republican campaign in 2024, but in 2026, that might not be enough to shield him from Donald Trump's retribution. Trump's message is very blunt. You can fund the opposition, but

It will cost you.

And please take care of yourselves and each other. And I'll see you tomorrow.