cover of episode [GLOBAL SOUTH] "Some Improvement" But Still a Long Way to Go to Resolve China-India Border Tensions

[GLOBAL SOUTH] "Some Improvement" But Still a Long Way to Go to Resolve China-India Border Tensions

2024/12/11
logo of podcast The China in Africa Podcast

The China in Africa Podcast

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
D
Daniel Balazs
E
Eric Olander
专注于分析中国在全球南方的技术创新和影响的媒体人物和分析师。
K
Kobus van Staden
印度外交部长S. Jaishankar
Topics
印度外交部长S. Jaishankar:中印边境局势有所缓和,但关系完全恢复正常仍需数年时间。双方已完成部分军队脱离接触,但仍需进行降级,这需要更长时间的谈判和努力。中方在2020年采取的行动破坏了边境地区的和平与安宁,目前取得的进展是持续外交努力的结果。 Kobus van Staden:Jaishankar的表态可能出于降低预期和应对国内政治反对派的考虑。 Eric Olander:目前缺乏中国方面的官方回应,这使得对中印边境局势的解读存在局限性。Jaishankar的表述完全是从印度的角度出发,中方立场可能大相径庭。 Daniel Balazs:中印已完成七个摩擦点的军队脱离接触,但降级尚未开始。脱离接触是指军队彼此拉开距离,降级是指减少边境地区的军队数量。双方将继续讨论降级事宜及未来关系走向。中印边境问题的解决似乎印证了印度坚持边境稳定是前提条件的策略,但双方都从这一进展中获益。印度在中印边境问题上的让步,受到国内经济界压力和自身经济发展目标的驱动。维持在边境的军事存在对印度来说代价高昂,也分散了其在其他地区的资源。莫迪政府在完成连任后,选择在这个时间点达成协议,可能与国内政治因素有关。中国在边境问题上做出让步,可能是为了应对印度与美国加强合作的趋势,以及维护金砖国家合作的需要。未来中印关系可能走向更具选择性的经济合作,而美国政策的变化也可能影响双边关系。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

WHY are India and China negotiating a border settlement?

Maintaining the military standoff along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) has been economically and strategically draining for both nations. India faced pressure from its business community to ease restrictions on Chinese trade and investment, while China sought to improve its image as a reasonable global actor and strengthen its position within BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

What is the difference between "disengagement" and "de-escalation" along the LAC?

Disengagement refers to troops pulling back from close proximity at friction points, creating physical distance to reduce the risk of immediate clashes. De-escalation involves a reduction in the overall number of troops deployed in the border region. While disengagement from seven friction points has been achieved, de-escalation is the next phase of negotiations.

What are India's primary concerns regarding the border dispute?

India insists on peace and stability along the border as a prerequisite for normalized relations with China. While acknowledging "some improvement," India's External Affairs Minister, S. Jaishankar, emphasized that a full "reset" will take years and expressed concerns about China's past territorial acquisitions and the need for a fair boundary settlement.

What is China's stance on the border dispute?

China has been less vocal about its position, though it has expressed a desire to improve economic ties with India. There is an expectation that China will likely emphasize the need for India to create a more favorable investment environment.

How has the border dispute affected India's relationship with other countries?

The 2020 border clashes led to a noticeable tilt in India's strategic posture towards the U.S. and the Quad, involving increased intelligence sharing and military cooperation. China views this alignment with suspicion, perceiving it as part of a U.S.-led effort to contain its influence.

What role did domestic politics play in India's approach to the border dispute?

The timing of the border agreement, shortly after Modi's re-election for a final term, is seen as strategically significant. It allowed him to make a potentially controversial deal without facing immediate electoral consequences, as defending territorial integrity is often linked to a leader's legitimacy.

How might the incoming Trump administration influence the India-China relationship?

The potential for new U.S. tariffs under Trump could impact both India and China, potentially pushing them closer together economically as they seek to reduce reliance on the U.S. market. However, Trump's unpredictable foreign policy, including his stance on alliances like the Quad, adds a significant element of uncertainty.

What is the likely future of economic relations between India and China?

While both sides have expressed interest in improving economic ties, a return to pre-2020 levels of engagement is unlikely. India is expected to pursue a more selective approach, identifying sectors where Chinese investment is welcome while maintaining restrictions in sensitive areas. China may exhibit more caution and emphasize the need for India to foster a better investment climate.

Shownotes Transcript

India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar told the lower house of parliament last week that "some improvement" had been made in resolving the ongoing border dispute with China. But he also cautioned that a lot more work has to be done and that it will take years to "reset" relations with Beijing.

The two sides have pulled back their military forces from seven points along their contested boundary in the Himalayas, so they're no longer in close proximity to one another, but those troops are nonetheless still stationed there and haven't yet been redeployed.

Daniel Balazs, a research fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, is a specialist in Sino-Indian relations and joins Eric to discuss what's motivating the two countries to negotiate a border settlement.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION: X: @ChinaGSProject) | @cgneema) | @eric_olander) | @stadenesque)

Facebook: www.facebook.com/ChinaAfricaProject) YouTube: www.youtube.com/@ChinaGlobalSouth)

Now on Bluesky! Follow CGSP at @chinagsproject.bsky.social)

FOLLOW CGSP IN FRENCH AND ARABIC: Français: www.projetafriquechine.com) | @AfrikChine) Arabic: عربي: www.alsin-alsharqalawsat.com) | @SinSharqAwsat)

JOIN US ON PATREON! Become a CGSP Patreon member and get all sorts of cool stuff, including our Week in Review report, an invitation to join monthly Zoom calls with Eric & Cobus, and even an awesome new CGSP Podcast mug! www.patreon.com/chinaglobalsouth)