We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Chewy Fetches Growth

Chewy Fetches Growth

2025/3/26
logo of podcast Motley Fool Money

Motley Fool Money

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
C
Charlie Youakim
M
Mary Long
主持金融播客,讨论伯克希尔哈撒韦、TGI Fridays 和 Uber 等公司的最新动态。
T
Tim Beyers
高级分析师和领先顾问,专注于软件和技术行业的投资分析。
Topics
Tim Beyers: 我认为Dollar Tree出售Family Dollar是为了解决其长期存在的债务问题,并释放Dollar Tree自身的增长潜力。Dollar Tree收购Family Dollar后背负了巨额债务,此后一直在努力降低成本、优化商品和定价。出售Family Dollar可能帮助Dollar Tree摆脱负担,从而释放其增长潜力。Dollar Tree拥有强大的现金流和债务偿还能力,出售Family Dollar后,其财务状况将进一步改善。Dollar Tree的财务状况正在好转,出售Family Dollar可能使其发展更快。 此外,经济低迷时期,部分消费者可能不会选择尝试Dollar Store,导致其增长受限。Dollar Store的核心客户群体也受到了经济压力的影响,消费能力下降。通货紧缩导致商品实际价格上涨,消费者购买力下降,影响了Dollar Store的销售。Dollar Store需要吸引新的客户群体,并与其他折扣零售商竞争。Dollar Store不仅要与其他Dollar Store竞争,还要与规模更大的折扣零售商(如沃尔玛)竞争。沃尔玛凭借其庞大的规模和强大的供应链管理能力,拥有显著的成本优势和定价权。沃尔玛强大的供应链管理能力和数据分析能力使其拥有显著的利润优势。沃尔玛的数据和物流能力使其拥有强大的利润优势,并不断扩大领先地位。从大型超市转向沃尔玛购物没有社会污名,但从大型超市转向Dollar Tree购物可能存在心理障碍。沃尔玛能够满足消费者的各种需求,而Dollar Tree则相对有限。沃尔玛提供的商品种类和价格优势远超Dollar Tree。 Mary Long: 尽管消费者信心指数低迷,零售额增长缓慢,但Dollar Tree和Dollar General的表现并未出现预期中的大幅增长。Dollar Tree和Dollar General的表现不如预期,这可能是因为其目标客户群体也受到了经济压力的影响。Chewy的客户数量和每客户的销售额都在增长,这表明其业务正在蓬勃发展。Chewy的客户增长在疫情后一度放缓,但后来又恢复了增长,原因尚不明确。Chewy的客户忠诚度很高,但这需要持续的投入来维护。许多公司在建立客户忠诚度后,又将其破坏,这提醒Chewy需要谨慎维护客户关系。 Charlie Youakim: Sezzle是一个“反向分期付款”平台,客户可以先拿到商品,再分期付款。Sezzle的模式提高了商家的转化率和销售额,并改变了消费者的购买行为。Sezzle的目标客户是中等及以下收入的年轻群体,他们更倾向于使用借记卡而不是信用卡进行分期付款。Sezzle的支付方式方便了消费者预算管理,避免了信用卡带来的债务压力。Sezzle改变了消费者的购买行为,让消费者能够更方便地进行分期付款。Sezzle为消费者、商家和Sezzle自身三方都带来了好处。Sezzle通过创新,推出了直接面向消费者的模式,包括订阅服务和按需服务。Sezzle的Premium订阅服务允许客户在Sezzle的应用程序中购买来自300家顶级商家的商品。Sezzle的Anywhere订阅服务允许客户使用虚拟卡在任何地方购物。Sezzle的On-Demand服务允许客户按需支付服务费进行交易。Sezzle与WebBank合作提供按需服务,并与Bastion合作提供融资。Sezzle从Bastion获得融资,利率为SOFR加6.25%。Sezzle的订阅服务收入可观,这使其在同行业中具有独特的竞争优势。Sezzle是目前最全面的先买后付提供商,拥有强大的订阅服务。Sezzle的订阅服务使其在竞争中脱颖而出。Sezzle的订阅服务方便了客户的使用,提高了客户粘性。Sezzle的模式具有良好的可扩展性,并且能够应对不同的宏观经济环境。Sezzle的模式从一开始就具有良好的可扩展性。Sezzle的运营支出与毛利之间的关系表明其具有良好的可扩展性。Sezzle的融资模式轻资产,对现金的需求较少。Sezzle的融资模式使其具有较强的抗风险能力。Sezzle的融资需求较低,这使其在经济下行时期具有较强的韧性。Sezzle的增长和毛利率使其能够减少对信贷额度的依赖。Sezzle的目标是保持高毛利率,以应对经济下行风险。Sezzle的高毛利率使其能够应对经济下行风险。Sezzle的高毛利率为其提供了应对经济下行风险的缓冲。 Tim Beyers: Chewy通过为客户提供更多服务来提高客户粘性和每客户销售额(wallet share)。Chewy的自动送货服务(AutoShip)非常成功,促进了客户关系的深化和销售额的增长。Chewy的自动送货服务(AutoShip)销售额增长迅速,对现金流和客户关系的改善有积极作用。Chewy的自动送货服务占比越来越高,表明其与客户的关系越来越深厚。Chewy需要继续保持客户忠诚度,并在经济不确定性时期保持增长。Chewy第四季度的业绩令人鼓舞,但未来业绩仍存在不确定性。Chewy的宠物医疗诊所(vet care clinics)发展良好,有助于提升客户粘性和销售额。Chewy的宠物医疗诊所为客户提供了更全面的宠物护理服务,加强了客户关系。Chewy的业绩增长可能与宠物医疗诊所的成功有关。Chewy的宠物医疗诊所模式与Warby Parker的线下门店模式类似,都通过提供更全面的服务来提升客户粘性和销售额。Chewy的宠物医疗诊所可能是其业绩增长的催化剂。Chewy的盈利能力正在改善,这消除了投资者的一些担忧。Chewy通过提供全面的宠物护理服务,增加了客户的消费支出。如果Chewy能够继续提供全面的宠物护理服务,其股票将有良好的投资回报。Chewy的未来业绩仍需观察,尤其关注宠物医疗诊所的持续表现。 Tom Gardner & Andy Cross: (没有足够的上下文信息来总结他们的核心论点)

Deep Dive

Chapters
Dollar Tree is selling Family Dollar to private equity firms for $1 billion. This move, though seemingly a loss, could allow Dollar Tree to pay down debt and improve its overall performance. The sale might unleash Dollar Tree's potential for growth.
  • Dollar Tree bought Family Dollar in 2015 for $9 billion.
  • Dollar Tree is selling Family Dollar for $1 billion.
  • The sale could help Dollar Tree reduce debt and improve its financial health.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

The Dollar Tree gets a trim. You're listening to Motley for Money. I'm Mary Long, joined on this fine Wednesday morning by Mr. Tim Byers. We are live and in a kind of studio in Denver, Colorado. Tim, great to see you. How you doing?

Doing well, Mary? Fully caffeinated, ready to go? As am I. Refilled my coffee right before we walked in here. We'll kick off this morning with a story about a family of dollars. Once upon a time in the year 2015, the Dollar Tree bought the family dollar chain for $9 billion. Today, about 10 years later, the Dollar Tree is selling that family dollar chain for $1 billion. It's going to a duo of private equity companies.

Tim, solve this for us. Why couldn't Family Dollar find its place within the Dollar Tree family tree? I mean, I think they're different businesses, to be honest. The price for the deal isn't necessarily awesome. I do know that. But I'm not sure it's actually bad because if it doesn't fit, then it doesn't fit. And you have to figure out how to

make the business work on its own. And to be fair, the current Dollar Tree management has been figuring this out for quite some time. I mean, they, when they bought Family Dollar, they really piled up quite a lot of debt and, um,

They have ever since been lowering their costs, figuring out how to optimize merchandising, figuring out pricing and so forth. It has gotten a bit better. Now, I have heard from our colleague, Buck Hartzell, about this, and he's done a lot more work on this than I have. I think he's right in that removing this anchor from Dollar Tree

might unleash them.

Because even if it's only $1 billion, if you can take that $1 billion and use it to pay off even more debt and get Dollar Tree a bit unlocked, a bit more unleashed, we might see a much different and much more valuable Dollar Tree in the market. I'm a bit more optimistic about this. Remember, over the last year, about $1.5 billion of free cash flow,

and they've paid down about $3 billion in debt over just the past year. So this is a business that's getting better. If it's a little bit lighter, well, maybe it starts flying.

You talk about unleashing the potential of Dollar Tree. It seems, if we zoom out and look at the macro situation that we're in, we have some new data that came out earlier this week, earlier this month. The Consumer Confidence Index, for instance, came out earlier this week. It indicated that the economic outlook among a lot of Americans is at its lowest point in the past 12 years.

You've got reports of U.S. retail sales from February that came out earlier this month, and they were lower than expected. So, we haven't seen a full pullback. Sales rose, but only by 0.2%. So, with that in mind, one could be forgiven for assuming that, okay, this is actually a time for discount retailers to be unleashed, to potentially fly. Market's tight, people are tightening up their wallets, they might be more apt to turn to these discount retailers.

But that doesn't really seem to be what we're seeing unfold quite yet for Dollar Tree or Dollar General. The former operated at a loss in 2023 and has negative net income for the trailing 12 months. The latter still posting a profit, but it has shrinking margins. Why aren't we seeing boom times for these dollar-branded retailers quite yet? That's probably tougher to say.

Some of that may have to do with, you know, these just like every retailer, they do have some classic audiences. Like you are, and I don't think you're wrong to do this. You know,

There is maybe a class of consumers that typically has not shopped at a dollar store market. And when things get tighter, would they choose to try a dollar market? Maybe or maybe not. It is also possible that the core audience for these deep discount retailers are just getting squeezed because, frankly,

Everybody's getting squeezed. Even with these dollar stores, you have to think that some of the merchandising has changed, the pricing has changed.

I mean, your dollar is not going as far as the dollar used to go. This is something that we heard probably about a year ago. It was all talk about shrinkflation. The packaging is changing. Your dollar isn't going as far. You buy a bag of potato chips and you thought for $1.25, you were getting a 15-ounce

bag of potato chips and now you only get 12 ounces shrink flation. I do think that it's it's not as simple. So yes, there is an argument that this is a time for for dollar stores But I think those dollar stores have to convince You know, maybe a new audience to give them a shot and I think we're pretty early in the cycle for that

They have to convince a new audience to give them a shot, but also they have to compete against not just other dollar store type audiences,

stores, but other discount retailers. Walmart, for instance, is crushing it. In the past year, Walmart's stock price has increased by nearly 41%. Compare that to shares of Dollar Tree and Dollar General, both of which have lost over 43% of their value in the same timeframe. Why is there such a stark divide between the performance of these two admittedly different types of discount stores?

Scale matters. It always has. But in the case of Walmart, they're not unique, but they're pretty close to unique in the amount of power that they can exert over a supply chain. They're not just omnipresent around the United States and in different parts of the world.

but their ability to command pricing power in all the supply chains where they buy, because they buy in such bulk, such magnitude, that Walmart is just different. They're different scale.

They have an extraordinary amount of power in that respect. They are also one of the greatest users of data and logistics in the world, really. They have done more to build out an infrastructure that gives them real margin power

And it's just cooked straight into the business, Mary. And it's always been this way. And I think they're trying to widen their lead here. And times like this, where economically... See, I do think there is a difference. And I feel like I'm being a little bit unfair, but I don't know that I'm wrong. I do think there is a difference between maybe downgrading your shopping from like...

your local grocery store to Walmart and getting a little bit of a price break there, I don't think that has any stigma. If you're going from your grocery store to Dollar Tree and you're not used to doing that, I don't know that you're willing to make that leap.

I do think that is different. Also, the Dollar Tree, to be fair, is not going to have the same scale to serve your, let's say, your grocery needs. It's going to serve maybe some novelty needs and some of your grocery needs. But Walmart can essentially serve everything you want.

and at a potentially much lower price. - They're all discount retailers, but there's a lot more that you can get at a Walmart that you could not find at a Dollar Tree, Dollar Store or Family Dollar. - Right.

We'll move on to another story. Chewy, the pet supply retailer, posted fourth quarter earnings this morning. Tim, I've been in a co-working space with you long enough. I know you love pets. I know you love dogs. Love me some dogs. Yep. So let's figure out how you feel about this stock. One closely watched metric for Chewy is its customer count. So they added over 430,000 active net customers over the course of the year. The increased net sales per active customer, a

Immediately post-pandemic though, Chewy was experiencing some slowing customer growth. What happened to turn that trend around? What did they do?

It's hard to say exactly what happened here, but it does appear that Chewy is doing a lot to do more for its customers. In tech, we hear this term a lot, but it's called wallet share. We are getting more from our customers by doing more for our customers. I'll talk a little bit more about this in a minute.

As a provider that you can go back to reliably over and over and over again, the evidence is that customers are relying on Chewy more and more and more. The auto ship, for example, that has been an unqualified success. I mean, my goodness, you sign up for Chewy and then every month you get a certain amount of deliveries delivered.

on a prescribed schedule for your little furry friend. And that can include things like medicine. It can include food. It can include toys, all of this stuff. But auto ship sales were up more than 21%. And overall sales were up about 15%. So the fact that auto ship is growing as a

As a portion of overall sales, it's just so good for the business. It's really good for cash flow. So overall, AutoShip is now 80.6% of all sales. That's up from 76.4%. That is astoundingly good, Mary. It just means that the relationships with customers are getting deeper. And this is what we need.

As investors, we really need Chewy to convince its existing customers to do more with it. We need them to stay, we need them to grow their relationship, and then choose to do other things with Chewy over time. That does seem to be happening. I find that very encouraging. The key question is, with a lot of economic uncertainty right now,

Is it going to continue to be this way? I think it's very encouraging that in the fourth quarter, Chewy was able to achieve what they were able to achieve, more net customers, more spend. Right now, we are entering a very weird economic period. So this quarter, I think will be an interesting bellwether.

You talk about growing and deepening the relationship with the customer. This is something that's relevant for many businesses, but I feel as though it's really relevant whenever we have a conversation about Chewy. I hear it when I listen to investment analysis about this company, or just when you talk to customers and consumers about this company. People really hit home with this loyalty point about how much customers love Chewy.

That is great, but it costs money and time to create, to nurture, and to keep that customer loyalty. There are plenty of companies that build that up and then break that. I'll shout out my once beloved Southwest as having broken a brand promise in favor of improving and increasing their top and bottom lines.

How does Chewy balance its commitment to customer care, which their CEO is very explicit about, while also prioritizing growth and finances? Yeah, it's a tough one. This is the optionality argument that you've heard me make before. You have to provide more things that are of obvious value to the customer. They're not just going to stay because they like you.

you have to provide value. And in this particular case, I do find it very encouraging that Chewy has had some success with their vet care clinics. You know, they opened eight in the last fiscal year. They plan to open another eight to 10 in the coming fiscal year. And they seem to be doing quite well, Mary. I mean, they seem to be

providing a place for a chewy customer to go and do all the things you would do with chewy you could get some food you can get some toys but you could also get you know your take your furry friend in for boarding you could take them in for getting medications and shots and all of these other things that are very important and that's it does seem to be creating a touch point

for Chewy customers that leads them to engage more deeply. I find that super interesting. I hope it continues to be this way. It's too early to say whether or not this is exactly a good comparison, but what it appears to be just based on the nest pack customers, the net spend per active customer that was up, what, 21% year over year, really good numbers there.

it seems to have a little bit of a Warby Parker feel to it. And I'll tell you, that was the thing that really unlocked Warby Parker. When they started going to stores and you could come in and you can get your eye appointment done, you could get your tests done, and you could get a fairly affordable pair of glasses and use your FSA spend for it. If you're handling more of the overall

need for the customer. That seems to go very, very well. It's been a real boon for Warby Parker. It seems to be happening for Chewy, but I think it's just a little bit too early to tell. But that seems to be the indicator here. Those vet care clinics seem to be a catalyst that's driving this company forward, and I'm here for it.

A comparison between Warby Parker and Chewy was not necessarily on my bingo card for our conversation today. Anything else you want to add before we wrap up about this quarter or the year for Chewy? Well, I think it's nice to see that the economics of Chewy are starting to work out in their favor. Because one of the real worries, and you made this point before,

is that the active customer count was declining and it looked like they were going to be subject to some real headwinds in terms of the economic climate.

and that as a premium product, it was going to be easy to disconnect from Chewy. It's encouraging that that's not happening. What seems to me, Mary, the thesis now is that by virtue of handling more of the overall pet care, the life cycle of pet care, everything from vet to medication to food to toys to everything,

all of those things, it seems that they are sucking up more. They're getting more dollars by solving more of the problems. If that's true, and if it continues down this path, I think we're in for some very good returns for this stock.

It's still early. I will qualify this by saying, let's see how this vet care, you know, these vet care clinics continue to do over the next several quarters. But so far, so good. Tim Byers, always a pleasure. Thanks for coming on to the show today. Thanks, Mary.

Trading at Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade. Unlocking the power of thinkorswim, the award-winning trading platforms loaded with features that let you dive deeper into the market. Visualize your trades in a new light on thinkorswim desktop with robust charting and analysis tools, all while you uncover new opportunities with up-to-the-minute market news and insights. thinkorswim is available on desktop, web, and mobile to meet you where you are. It's built by the trading obsessed to help you trade brilliantly.

Learn more at Schwab.com slash trading.

Not all buy now, pay later companies are alike. Up next, we've got a closer look at Sezzle, the BNPL company that's built a bit differently from its competitors. What we're about to play is a cut of a longer conversation that originally aired on Fool24, our live stream that's available on YouTube and our premium platform. You'll hear two Foolish voices, our Chief Investment Officer, Andy Cross, plus our CEO and co-founder, Tom Gardner, interview Charlie Uyghur, Sezzle's CEO.

Well, Charlie, we're excited to have the conversation with you, talk all things Sezzle, which is really exciting. It's a recommendation of ours, so we're excited to get right into it and just talk a little bit maybe about the Buy Now, Pay Later company you founded. Can you explain what Sezzle does for our members? And really, why is it different in a very competitive Buy Now, Pay Later space? Yeah, one quick way to describe it, even to my mom when we first started the company, was think of like reverse layaway.

you know basically in the old days with layaway you'd make a purchase but you'd have to wait for the product buy now pay later is an innovation upon that where it's basically i call it reverse layaway because you make the purchase you get the product up front but the payment plan still exists paying for so it's four payments interest-free over a six-week time period so 25 down today two weeks four weeks six weeks and we automate the payment payment plan for the customer

And the reason it became very, very popular in a short period of time was it really made a massive difference for the merchant in terms of driving conversions, driving sales, increasing basket sizes, and just changing decision-making for the customer. And our customer tends to be like a mid to low income, younger customer. And what I think what was going through their mindset when they're making this purchase decision was, you know, I can budget for that product. I'll come back later.

And I don't want to use my credit card. 65% of our customers have a credit card, but they just choose to pay us with debit cards. They don't like to use the credit card. And so they say, I'll come back and buy it later. But merchants know that the customer is not going to come back. So we changed the buying behavior by basically putting the budgeting tool on the website and telling the customer about it, that you can pay in four for this over six weeks. And a lot of these customers get paid biweekly. And so the customers felt very comfortable that I could basically budget for this, make the decision to buy it now,

And they also felt comfortable with the credit product in that there was never a chance for like a credit card to create a burden in the future or some sort of stress where now I maybe I overspent a little bit and I can't pay that off in full next month. And now I've got this balance that I got to pay interest rate on. You know, so I think that's what the...

The aha was on the consumer side and on the merchant side. And that's why we've had this just dramatic growth in our sector and with Sezzle as well. I want to reset one more time just to help our members understand the three primary players here at a transaction. So maybe take a classic case study of who is it, who's your sort of classic customer? What are they actually buying?

And then what's Sezzle's part, what's the merchant's part, and what's the customer's part? Even though you've done a good job already with it, I think just walking us through one transaction would help. When we first started the business,

What we would do is we'd go to retailers and we'd tell retailers, put Sezzle on your site in the checkout, much like PayPal. Put us in the checkout. Put us on your product page, though. That was actually one of the most important keys. Put us on your product page. And when you're selling a product, and our typical products, early days, the key price points are $100 to $200. So I always give an example of a pair of jeans or you're buying a sweater. Fashion and apparel, beauty and cosmetics were the core at the start. So you're buying a pair of jeans for $100. On the site, it would say, or $100.

four interest-free payments of $25 with Sezzle. And you could click on that little advertisement widget and find out more, you know, because early days it seemed like it was too good to be true for the customer. So they had to learn more about, you know, this is real. And then what would happen is, okay, and then in that transaction, the merchant would pay us like a 6% plus 30 cents. That was our rack rate of our product. Blended average right now is more like 5% because we have larger merchants in the mix. So they'd pay us like we're a processor, the retailer.

So the customer decides, I want to buy that pair of jeans. They go to the checkout. They choose Sezzle. They sign up with us. We make the payment plan for that customer and fulfill the purchase. We pay the retailer the $100 minus the 5% blended average we have. So less the $5. So the retailer gets $95. They're happy. I got $95. It's two more dollars than I would have...

would have made or two less than I would have made if I would have processed with Stripe. But I still got 95 and made a sale. They've got margins that are like 60% margin, so they're happy. So they make the sale, they ship the product, customer gets the product, and then they now have a Sezzle account and they make the payments to Sezzle automated. It's all automated. They don't have to think about it. And those payments come into Sezzle over that six-week period.

That's basically the interplay between customer, retailer, and Sezzle. Original model. What Sezzle has done that has really made us attractive as a company, I think to investors, and just as a growth company now, is we've continued to innovate. I'm an entrepreneur. I'm a believer in innovation. The innovation that we launched, or the innovations, was more of a direct-to-consumer model. We have now two subscription levels and a pay-as-you-go product that allows the customer to

Originally, they were locked into our network of 25,000 merchants. They could shop at all those merchants in our app. We launched Premium in 2022, which allowed the customer to shop at 300 top merchants in the United States through our app if they paid us $12.95 per month.

and that unlocked a lot of places to shop that the merchants were the customers were asking for and so now there's a less of a relationship with the merchant or at least less of a direct relationship with the merchant they'd still go shot the customer would shop at the merchant we'd finance it we'd pay the merchant through interchange through like either a gift card or through a credit card we'd pay the merchant they'd get their funding but then the customer would just pay us back directly and then we launched anywhere the next year which allowed the customer to get a virtual card and just shop anywhere

for 17.95 per month and then this year or this past year just a few months ago we launched something called on demand which didn't require a subscription you could just basically pay a service fee almost like an atm fee four dollars every time you shop when you make a transaction you just pay four dollars and will transact no reason to get into a subscription so that's basically like the interplay right now between sezzle merchants and consumers there's a financing arm to this that you partner with

various firms. WebBank. Like WebBank, for example, that fund the ability for you to be able to pay the retailer, and then you pay a rate on that. Oh, absolutely. Yeah. So, WebBank is our banking as a service partner. They enable our on-demand product because it's a finance charge, essentially. So, that's where WebBank plays into it. This is a partner. And we just launched them in October of last year, late September.

But you're right. We also, we lend to the customer, essentially. We borrow from a group called Bastion. They've worked with us for the last six years. And they lend to us at SOFR plus six and a quarter or so, somewhere in that range. And that's our funding facility through to the customer. That's a unique proposition in the buy now, pay later space. And I just want to make sure our members understand kind of, so the, you know, an average monthly rate maybe of...

$15 or something, $15 to $16. And you're talking about, you know, hundreds of thousands of people who now who are subscribing to the Sezzle subscription offerings. And I just want to make sure we, because that's a lot, that is different than what you see from some of the other buy now pay later providers. Yeah. Most of the other buy now pay later providers are really focused on the merchant relationship, which was the original model. And I think if you look at Sezzle right now, we're, we're the most complete provider.

So there's one of our competitors, Zip, has what we call on-demand. We saw them launch it. We liked it. We knew we wanted it. We needed it. But we're, I think, the only player that has a very strong subscription offering, from what I can see, at least.

I know Afterpay launched one, and they no longer have it. I don't know why. Klarna has one, but it doesn't seem to be a large percentage of their business like ours is. I don't know why, again. It's basically Sezzle with this subscription offering that seems to be -- it definitely is an important part of our business. We're definitely unique in that regard. I think part of the reason why it's such a good product for the customer is,

You know, like all of us, we have this heuristic or natural human laziness. When you're signed up for a subscription, you don't have to think about when you're going to a site, which one of these am I going to use? You just use Sezzle. And that's worth the $15 a month. I don't have to think about it. I just...

Just use Sezzle. I don't have to look at the checkout, who's there. I just use Sezzle. So, I think it solved that kind of pain point for the customer. I'm not a financing lending expert. I did talk to somebody who spends a lot of time studying buy now, pay later companies. And their primary question was, what happens as the model scales?

And sourcing the capital to cover the X number of weeks that you are waiting to get the payment back from the customer. What happens if this company is five times larger? How do you see the pathway to making all the partnerships work and the financing arrangements work, including in different macroeconomic environments to the extent that that has an impact on your model? Yeah, great question, Tom. I mean, I think that's, I believe in scaling partnerships.

big time when I'm building a company. That's what makes a company attractive, its ability to scale. A couple of years back when we were going through this reinventing of the company and getting into profitability and continuing to push forward, we told investors, "Watch us. We are going to show you how well this company scales." I knew it scaled. I'll tell you an early example. When we first launched, we had our first holiday season, we probably had six people in the company. This is 2017, the first holiday season, six people in the company.

the thing just ran automated over the holiday season. No one's in the office. Intrinsically, I knew this scales incredibly well. It was not a massive holiday season compared to what we have today, but it's software, it's just running. We knew it scaled. I said to investors a couple of years back, and we keep on saying this because it's my favorite chart, we always talk about it. Look at our operational expenses,

versus our gross margin dollars. And we're going to show you how we can have a different angle of inclination on those two lines and show you how well it scales because we don't need to grow OPEX to grow revenue and grow gross margin dollars. And then in terms of the funding mechanism, it's because people have a question about that. The beauty of BNPL is it's very funding light.

Personally, I don't want to go longer-term with the company. You create a really heavy cash burden. Driving cash flow in a business is important to the valuation of the business. When you have a long-term financing activity, there's a lot of cash demand. With our product, it's essentially a three-week product, because we take 25% at point of sale, and then the last payment is at six weeks. Put the teeter-totter on it, it's a three-week product.

Our last couple of quarters, our draw on our line was $90 million and $105 million, I think, the last of this quarter. And if you think about that, we're doing over $2 billion in terms of run rate and processing, but we're only borrowing $100 million to do it. That's because of all that turnover. And then one of the really unique things, and it doesn't take a very complicated spreadsheet to see this, with our growth rates and our gross margin percentages,

Eventually, you can drive enough cash into the business where in theory, if you keep these sort of at the steady state, you don't need a line of credit.

you can scale off the line of credit. I mean, I'm not saying it's the best decision, but that's attractive that you have the option to if you want to, which I think makes you very resilient in potentially a very bad economy that you may not even have that much of a dependence on a line of credit at all. So I think that's one of the nice things. And then in terms of just resilience in economic downturns, that's why we shoot for a 55% to 60% gross margin.

Because the thing that's going to move the most in an economic recession or a very bad one, let's say, is principal loss rate. No doubt about it.

But we've got basically the 6% on dollars, on the GMV, 6% NTM or gross margin percentage. And that's a huge cushion for principal loss rates rising. Maybe we go from a 55% gross margin percentage down to a 35% in some sort of maelstrom. But we still have a 35% gross margin percentage. We've got a good barrier.

As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and are not approved by advertisers. With The Motley Fool Money Team, I'm Mary Long. Thanks for listening. We'll see you tomorrow.