Warren Buffett Passes the Torch
27:14 Share

Dylan Lewis: After 60 years, Buffett passes the torch. Motley Fool Money starts now. I'm Dylan Lewis, and I'm joined over the airwaves by Motley Fool Canada analyst Jim Gillies. Jim, thanks for joining me on this momentous Monday. Jim Gillies: Indeed. Thanks, Dylan.

We talk about the news very often. We don't always get something this good when something happens over the weekend. To quote the great Warren Buffett himself, "The time has arrived." After 60 years as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffett announced he'll be stepping down at the end of 2025 for a well-deserved semi-retirement. He announced this, Jim, closing out the annual meeting in Omaha over the weekend, which was news to basically everybody except his kids.

Correct, yes. I had a number of friends on the floor, and one of them texted me literally as he was speaking, going, "Holy," insert golf word here, "Buffett just announced his retirement." And I'm like, "Okay, I'm going to have to take a moment to process this."

In typical Buffett fashion, it wasn't, "I'm leaving the CEO seat." It was him handing over the reins, but it was in an overview of board meetings and votes and recommendations. If it weren't for the standing ovation, if you had tuned out for a second, you actually might have missed it, because it was right at the end of the meeting and discussion. Yeah. Look, I am a Berkshire shareholder for almost three decades.

The entire way, Dylan, I've been told, aren't you worried? He's so old. Like, he's going to die soon. And thankfully, and a key lesson from Buffett reiterated many times over the years, including in this most recent annual meeting, is like, you know what? Take your time. Think through.

you know, things, things are not that imperative in the moment. And so I'm very glad I've ignored all of them. All of the people say, Oh boy, he's really old. And I similarly think about it a little bit today. It's like,

Buffett has been kind of prepping people for this quite honestly nearly two decades. I remember after his first wife passed away, Susie, it was always the intent of the Buffetts to give away the vast wealth that he's created.

And Susie was supposed to be the one because she was expected to outlive Warren. She was going to be the one handling the dispensation of that money. Susie's been gone for almost two decades now, Dylan.

We've seen him for, you know, I remember back at, it might be 15 or so years ago now, where they were first started talking about having the names of multiple people who could take over for him, step in whenever. The names in the envelope that could step in for him have changed constantly.

But a number of years ago, Charlie, who of course left us just over a year ago, Charlie kind of let slip at one meeting that the name, the only real name in the envelope that could take over for Buffett was Greg Abel, longtime CEO of Berkshire Hathaway Energy, MidAmerican Energy beforehand. And he just kind of confirmed what everybody largely knew.

I don't think much is going to change. First off, in a completely unsurprising development, the board did, in fact, vote unanimously along with Warren's suggestion. Hands up who thought that wouldn't happen. Yeah, zero surprise here, right? Exactly. Well, also two board members are

Warren's kids who, as you said, knew about this. They have in fact voted unanimously to pass the CEO's title to Greg Abel. This is the start of 2026. You've got another almost eight months with Uncle Warren at the helm.

at which point he will remain as non-executive chairman. He did allude to the idea that should markets behave in a certain way, and he didn't say it, but I will, plunge precipitously, they would be interested in deploying some of the

massive cash hoard they've got now, which I think is playing with $350 billion, that he would be useful perhaps reputation-wise to help deploy some of that capital should circumstances require it. And again, he was too polite to say if the markets blow up and people freak out. But that's what we're talking about here. Go back to 2008 and that's, you know,

If you find my advice helpful during any time, just let me know, essentially, the Buffettism. Yeah, exactly. But I don't think a lot's going to change. And part of that is because they've been gradually transitioning the day-to-day operating business into the hands of Greg Abel. They've long transitioned the decision-making at Geico, or is that Geico? Just in the insurance arms, all of the insurance arms, into the hands of Ajit Jain.

They have long been adding to the responsibilities of Ted and Todd, the investing lieutenants.

Buffett has long espoused that a ham sandwich should be able to run this business. In fact, I saw someone was quipping, another Fool was quipping with us this morning. I hope Greg had a t-shirt at that board meeting that said ham sandwich on it. I see the stock. I think the stock fell as much as 6% or 7% today. I wish it fell more. I hope it falls more in the next week or so because obviously, I'm talking about it now, so I'm locked out. I would be a happy buyer of shares today.

without a thing and without a concern, frankly.

Yeah. I was going to say, this is the first time we've ever seen the market have to weigh what they think of a Berkshire without Buffett, maybe a 4% or 5% discount on shares today. I don't think anyone could find that unexpected. It's a surprise no matter when it happens. It's a surprise no matter how well they lay out the succession planning. We've known Greg Abel, since 2021 formally, would be taking over this seat. And I think you're right. I think they've done such a nice job telegraphing

what's coming and also telegraphing. There are core Berkshire principles to the way that we approach things. And that probably isn't going to change very much. I remember looking back on some of the content from the morning meetings and the Q and A's and stuff like that over the weekend.

Someone had the foresight, not knowing what was coming, to ask, "Hey, Greg, what is something you've learned from Warren Buffett over the years?" Incredibly prescient question, it turns out. He talked about how, when they were first meeting, talking through MidAmerican Energy Holdings and that acquisition, the first thing that Buffett did was zoom in on the balance sheet. The first thing he did was zoom in on the derivative holdings for the company and start asking all these questions about risk,

exposure, what was actually there. Abel and Buffett both talked quite a bit at the annual meeting about the importance of being balance sheet-oriented, looking at the fundamentals of these businesses,

If you're a Berkshire shareholder, none of that stuff's going to change. That is going to continue to be the guide for how this management team is making decisions. Yes, and I don't think it was a surprise to anyone who's been a long-term Buffett slash Berkshire follower. If you were not aware that Uncle Warren likes his balance sheets, if you asked Greg, what's one thing you learned, I thought you were going to say how to keep a secret. Yeah.

He kind of did that a little bit. I'm guessing Greg maybe had a little heart palpitation there on stage, learning alongside all of the Berkshire shareholders that this was happening. What a vote of confidence, though, to have that. Even though he knows the job is going to be his. And again, look, Uncle Warren is 94. He'll be 95 at the end of the summer. If you don't expect someone approaching that anniversary of their existence to be

Maybe wanting to slow down a little bit, plan for retirement. It had to have been the subject. Well, as I said, I have heard variants of the, "Are you sure you want to be here for as long as I've held shares and my own personal shares, at least my earliest ones, can legally rent a car in the U.S.?"

Yes, they've matured. Exactly. One way to put it. They should hit the gym more. They're starting to have that middle-age precursor happening there. Continue, anyway. As you noted, this is a business now sitting on an incredible amount of cash, $347 billion, I think, as of the most recent report and the updates over the weekend. I have to imagine that that was also some of the intentionality with this planning.

Buffett unwinding some of the large positions that existed with Bank of America, with Apple over the years, and really putting Able and the management team in a position to make decisions that they were excited about, that they were interested in, that followed the Berkshire playbook, and probably to be opportunistic as there's possibly some clouds out there on the horizon.

Yeah. I mean, he kind of downplayed some of the -- you know, people say, oh, you're just trying to set up things for Greg Abel. It's like, no, you know, I'm not so charitable to make life easy for him. If an opportunity was here for me, I'd take it. Paraphrased. I mean, Apple is unquestionably the best investment, like, stock investment that Buffett has made, you could argue.

Others have done better percentage-wise or over a longer term. But in terms of the sheer amount of money, Buffett himself said, Tim Cook, Apple CEO, Tim Cook has made more money for Berkshire shareholders than I have. Point taken. Well, point taken. I will push back a little bit on Buffett and say, yeah, but you were the one that went into it, again, ignoring what other people were saying, which 2016

was that it's the biggest company in the world, how much growth is there left, turned out to do okay. I think it's going to be prescient for Berkshire, because of course, Apple itself went through its own, shall we say, high-profile succession plan back in 2010 through 2011, because founder Steve Jobs, of course,

famously, unfortunately, and I say this with all respect, drew the short straw in life, had a health issue that

tremendously shortened his life. That was tragic. But before he went, of course, and Tim Cook had stepped in for a lot of the day-to-day stuff with Apple before that. But officially, I think a few weeks before, it's now back in 2011. It's a few weeks before Steve's ultimate departure, Tim Cook was made the

the official CEO. On that day, the stock didn't have a great day. I've said for a number of years now on various forums, foolish forums, from a value creation perspective,

Tim Cook has been a far better CEO for Apple than Steve Jobs was. Now, Tim Cook doesn't get this opportunity without Steve Jobs and without the vision and the idea. I would say, Tim Cook is an execution guy, Steve Jobs is an idea guy or was an idea guy. The execution guy doesn't get to work as magic without the idea guy to start. So, you need both. But the sheer value that's been created at Apple

in the Tim Cook era greatly outstrips what was created during the Steve Jobs era. But you got to give Jobs some credit for what he planted the seeds so that Tim Cook could have the harvest. I think that's what's probably going to unfold with Berkshire Buffett, Greg Abel, is that Buffett has

put all kinds of seeds in play and has put the culture in play and has been, as we said before, slowly farming out bits and pieces of the business to the key players at Berkshire. He himself has said, literally at this meeting, that he thinks the Greg Abel era going forward will probably make more money for Berkshire shareholders than he would.

Yeah, I think he said, "I will remain a shareholder," and that is a financial decision. Exactly. I trust the management team here. I'm glad you brought up the Apple example, because Buffett gave a nod to that, too. He had a quote, "Nobody but Steve could have created Apple. Nobody but Tim could have developed it like he has." I think you could swap out the names there. He's essentially talking about his own business, right? He is. Now, will Greg Abel, overseeing Ted and Todd,

Will they be able to create some of the magic that we've seen in stock picking? And I think, actually, that'll be a tough sell. But I also think it's a tough sell under Buffett because of the size of the company.

Again, Apple has been the last real big home run. There's been a bunch of little things that haven't worked out and that's fine. Or IBM didn't work out or the airlines didn't work out. Now, I'm of the opinion that Buffett got out of the airlines

during COVID, because when the facts change, I change my mind, what do you do, sir? The world changed, right? A worldwide pandemic that shuts down air traffic for a not insignificant period of time.

makes those airlines worth -- it changes the calculus about how you calculate the fair value of those airlines. He knew they were going to need government assistance, and he also knew that the optics of having Warren Buffett, one of the richest people on Earth,

through Berkshire Hathaway, it wasn't Warren Buffett owning them, but it was Berkshire. The fact that Berkshire Hathaway being the largest shareholder of all of these airlines, that now all of a sudden need a bailout, the optics of that are going to be pretty bad. And he also knew he didn't want to be the guy bailing out the airlines. So, oh, I'm going to sell my shares, that takes him off the board and takes Berkshire off the board. That way they can qualify for

reasonably well for government funding. And whatever you think about airlines and their perpetual need to go hat in hand to the government at every crisis, I leave that as an exercise for the listener. I think it will be an interesting play from here. And I don't think -- and I say this again, I know I've said, I'm trying to remain respectful and giving -- Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway have been very, very good to me personally.

As I've mentioned, it is my largest shareholding, it is my longest-held shareholding. But let us be honest, the stock picking over the past decade or so has not been spectacular aside from Apple. And I would argue that is not because Warren Buffett has faded in abilities or anything.

That is because this is a $1.15 trillion company with a bazillion different irons in the fires. They mentioned there was a $10 billion acquisition as well that they passed on. My response to that, all I could think of when I heard about that over the weekend was, "Who cares?"

$10 billion? A $10 billion acquisition for a company with $348 billion or $350 billion in dry powder, it's 3% of your cash. It's not material. It's irrelevant. I don't want to hear about $10 billion acquisitions prospectively. I want to hear about minimum $100 billion prospective acquisitions. Bigger is better,

How many of those companies are out there that will be available at a price that Berkshire and Buffett and Greg Abel and Ted and Todd would think compelling? And I submit to you, there ain't many, which is why, you know, one reason why I think Buffett is, you know, I'll go play. He's going to go day trade.

- It's a good time for him to step away. The house is relatively tidy. He's been able to put things in pretty good shape.

Trading as Schwab is now powered by Ameritrade, bringing you an expanding library of education with even more ways to sharpen your trading skills. Access new online courses, insightful webcasts, articles, engaging videos, and more, all curated just for traders. Plus, guided learning paths with content designed to fit your unique interests. No sifting to find exactly what you need so you can spend your time learning to trade brilliantly.

Learn more at Schwab.com slash trading. What is kind of amazing to me, taking a step back on Berkshire, is sitting on record levels of cash. And we know what cash is earning right now.

It's, year to date, up more than 10%. The market is in the opposite direction, down about 4% year to date. Investors haven't seemed to mind giving them a little bit of time to put that money to work. They've been rewarded for their patience so far. I don't think that will change. I think anyone who's expecting anything really large

is going to be waiting quite a while. I think we're going to see a capital allocation and deployment strategy that is very much like what we've seen in the past. That might mean we're looking at $3-figure billion of cash on the balance sheet for a long period of time. Yeah. I think you can probably assume, because they've said this, expect that cash balance to never again drop below $50 billion.

Now, when you have $350 billion -- There's room to go down. We can just hold that and it's fine. I am genuinely curious to see it. I don't think you're going to see it anytime soon.

I think Buffett probably needs to ultimately exit the board fully before you'll ever see anything here. But I am curious to see, because it took about a minute and a half after the announcement before various denizens of Twitter started saying, "Break up Berkshire Hathaway now, it needs to be broken up," or "When are they going to pay a dividend?"

Calm down, folks. I think really, truly, nothing is going to change. Nothing is going to change as long as Buffett is consuming oxygen. I think nothing changes.

when he ultimately leaves the scene. I think nothing is going to change really for a little while longer. I think they will continue in reinvesting in their existing businesses. It wouldn't shock me to see them deploying incremental capital in some of their already-existent areas. More energy. They famously talked over the past, let's say, 15 to 20 years about how they like businesses where they can deploy significant capital at Google

good expected returns, but that would be the railroad and that would be a few of their other businesses where they can, again, the utilities. I would be shocked outside of a market dislocating event. I would be shocked to see them make any meaningful

drawdown of that cash hoard. I don't think they're going out and buying Disney tomorrow. I don't think they're going out to take out Hershey or try to acquire Mars privately. They might, but these are the types of businesses that would be fun to see them make a run at Coca-Cola. I will say that would tickle me a little bit. It would fit the profile. It

It would. And it would certainly fit Buffett's tastes.

Yeah, I think you're right. The market may give them that dislocating moment. We've talked at length on the show about how there is a bit of a precarious situation going on macro-wise. I don't know what you're talking about. Buffett has provided some commentary on that. I can't think of a better position to be in, to have $350 billion in cash, if you expect there may be a lot of headwinds away and there may be some discounts available to the business.

You mentioned railroads. You talked about energy a little bit. Any other sectors you think might fit the profile for a Berkshire acquisition, if we start seeing some things on sale? Coca-Cola would be funny, but it's also possible, right?

I don't know how far they'd get. No, I think you want to look at a space where they already have an interest. It will not be technology-motivated. It's always going to be where we like to invest in places where we think we know. I mean, there's the famous story about what was the best-selling candy bar in

you know, the '80s? Well, it was Snickers. Snickers. What was it in the '90s? Well, it was Snickers. I don't know who's going to have the dominant operating system in 20 years. You'd probably make a good guess. But people are going to still be eating Snickers. But you're probably going to be buying Snickers. And the pricing power of a Snickers or the pricing power of a can of Coke is probably going to -- or a bottle of ketchup, because he's famously got the Kraft Heinz Association -- is

probably going to be there. I would like to see them. It's always going to be a low technology possibility.

The obvious things are more insurance, more energy, consumer products with a significant brand moat. So, you know, a Coca-Cola. I joke a little bit, even at Disney, but even Disney is, you know, there are problems if Disney were to ever be something like that. I think it's going to be interesting to see where it goes. I am...

signing up for the ride. I've been signed up for the ride for a while. At the very least, I'd like to not vacate my shares while I'm still drawing a regular paycheck because I don't particularly want to hand the government a

large check. As you say, it's a great place to be. And yeah, it has been a great place to be. And the cornerstone of my philosophy or my investing philosophy has to have the ballast holdings in my portfolio, of which Berkshire is absolutely one. It's the largest one, as I've said. And those ballast holdings, that for me, Brookfield is another one. Some people really like Fairfax Financial. Have your ballast holdings so you can go out and do some more

riskier plays. I'm not talking day trading or penny stocks or stuff like that, but still things that may or may not work out for you, but you've always got the ballast just to keep you calm. In days when

When you see those market dislocations, I would really encourage people to go back and look at what Buffett was doing during the global financial crisis, the 2008 crisis. Wasn't panicking. Stock got hit along with everything else. That's fine. Buffett has said even this weekend, we don't care about that kind of stuff. Berkshire's fallen, I don't know how many times, by 50%. Doesn't bother us in the slightest. Focus on the business, all that wonderful stuff. But remember what he did back then.

Goldman Sachs came hat in hand. The vampire squid came hat in hand. Buffett said, "Sure, I'll help you. Here's your 15% anchor." Harley-Davidson came hat in hand. "Sure, we'll help you. Here's your 15% anchor." Bank of America,

I think, gave penny warrants or dollar warrants as part of the investment, don't call it a bailout, as part of the investment that Buffett made in Bank of America and there's others. That's one thing I think I want people to remember about. Buffett's got this kindly Midwestern old dude persona. When it comes to allocating capital, dude's a killer. You want my money, it's going to be 15%.

My end is 15, Precious, and that's how we're starting. We'll take a little bit of equity comp as well. I hope that Greg Gable and Ted and Todd can be similarly value extractive, shall we call it, during future market dislocations, which as Buffett, again, said this weekend,

coming. We don't know when they are. They will come. Probably be a Tuesday. He seems to think that the business is in good hands with Greg running it. And again, if we have trusted Buffett's process on the building of Berkshire, I suggest to you we should be similarly trusting of his transition planning for the business that he's building.

Jim, it sounds like even though he won't be calling the shots for your largest holding, his tenants, his investing style will remain the pillars of your portfolio and how you expect Berkshire will continue to be run. Sounds about right to me, yes. Jim, thanks for talking through it today. Thank you, Dylan.

As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell anything based only on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, check out our show notes. For The Motley Fool Money team, I'm Dylan Lewis. We'll be back tomorrow.