We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Meta's news blackout in Canada causes problems during election

Meta's news blackout in Canada causes problems during election

2025/4/30
logo of podcast Marketplace All-in-One

Marketplace All-in-One

AI Deep Dive Transcript
People
K
Kimberly Adams
M
Megan McCarty Carino
Topics
Megan McCarty Carino: 我报道了加拿大首次在Facebook上新闻全面封锁的大选。这场选举是2023年加拿大通过《在线新闻法案》后的首次联邦选举,该法案要求社交媒体平台与新闻出版商就内容使用费进行谈判,否则可以选择封锁新闻。 Kimberly Adams: 我从加拿大报道了这项法案及其对在线新闻环境的影响。这项2023年的法律要求社交媒体平台和在线内容提供商要么与新闻出版商谈判付费协议,要么支付仲裁员设定的费用。Meta和Google曾大力游说阻止该法案,但最终该法案成为法律。这项法律旨在通过迫使大型科技公司分享收入来支持加拿大新闻业,因为新闻业多年来一直在苦苦挣扎。 Google与加拿大政府达成协议,每年向新闻媒体组织提供1亿美元资金,而Meta则选择封锁加拿大用户在Facebook和Instagram上分享或查看新闻链接,这影响了包括非加拿大新闻提供商的新闻链接。 一项研究显示,Meta的新闻封锁导致加拿大媒体参与度下降近一半,超过200家新闻机构倒闭,其中大部分是地方性媒体。虽然行业趋势也起到了作用,但这项禁令对媒体格局造成了迅速而重大的变化。 在加拿大选举期间,虽然大多数加拿大人没有注意到新闻链接的缺失,或者他们仍然通过截图等方式获取新闻,但大量非新闻内容,特别是具有党派性和误导性的内容,在信息真空的环境中迅速传播。此外,大量AI生成的政治领导人虚假图像和视频也在传播,这与Meta减少内容审核以及新闻封锁有关。传播的虚假信息主要是非政治性的,例如加密货币诈骗,其中甚至包括AI生成的Mark Carney(即将上任的总理)推销虚假投资项目的视频。 尽管Meta为选举提供了工具以引导用户获取权威信息并打击误导性AI内容,但其在加拿大的强硬态度是为了阻止其他国家效仿加拿大模式。Meta利用加拿大经验游说,阻止了加州类似法案的通过。 Dwayne Winsec: 我是卡尔顿大学的新闻学教授,也是全球媒体和互联网集中项目主任。我谈到了科技平台对加拿大《在线新闻法案》的不同回应:Google与加拿大政府达成协议,每年向新闻媒体组织提供1亿美元资金;而Meta则封锁了新闻链接。 Taylor Owen: 我在麦吉尔大学任教,并领导媒体、技术与民主中心。我们的调查显示,大多数加拿大人没有注意到新闻链接的缺失,但虚假信息却迅速传播,AI生成的虚假图像和视频也大量出现。Meta减少内容审核和新闻封锁加剧了这一问题。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Canada's first big election with a news blackout on Facebook. From American Public Media, this is Marketplace Tech. I'm Megan McCarty Carino. Canada's Liberal Party and its leader, Mark Carney, are set to remain in control after the country held federal elections Monday. They were the first since Canada adopted the Online News Act in 2023.

The law requires online content providers, like social media platforms, to negotiate some sort of fair payment to news publishers in exchange for using their content. Or they can just do what Meta did, block all news from their Facebook and Instagram platforms altogether.

We spoke with Marketplace senior Washington correspondent Kimberly Adams, who's reporting from Canada, to learn more about that law and what happened to the online news environment after it passed.

So this was a 2023 law that requires social media platforms and other online content providers to either negotiate deals to pay news publishers for their content or to pay some kind of fee that arbitrators would help set. And this was mainly going after Meta and Google, and they lobbied hard to stop the bill, but it ultimately became law.

Now, this law was Canada's attempt to support its news industry, ideally by forcing these big tech companies to share some of the money they make when users share news articles. Because just like here in the U.S., that industry, the news industry, has been struggling for years.

And so how did these tech platforms respond to this law? I asked Dwayne Winsec, who teaches journalism at Carleton University in Ottawa. He's also director of the Global Media and Internet Concentration Project there. And he talked about two different responses. Google came to the table and it made an agreement with the Canadian government to provide $100 million dollars

per year into a fund that will be distributed by a third-party consortium to news media organizations. And that has to do with, like, the size of the organization and how many journalists they have working for them. On the other hand, Meta took a very different approach.

and blocked users in Canada from being able to share or view news links on their platforms, Instagram and Facebook, rather than comply with this law. Now, this can affect links for news stories from even non-Canadian news providers. So it's been a couple years since then. How big of an effect has this kind of news blackout on Facebook and Instagram had? A

According to a study by the Center for Media, Technology, and Democracy at McGill University, almost half of all media engagement across all platforms has just disappeared. And more than 200 news outlets have gone under, the vast majority of which were local. Now, obviously, there's been some industry trends playing into that as well, but it was a pretty rapid change in the media landscape after the ban. We'll be right back.

You're listening to Marketplace Tech. I'm Megan McCarty Carino. We're back with Marketplace's senior Washington correspondent, Kimberly Adams. So this was the first federal election in Canada since these policies kicked in.

How did it shape the information ecosystem around the election? So Taylor Owen, who teaches at McGill and runs that Center for Media Technology and Democracy I just mentioned, pointed out that in their survey, most Canadians didn't even notice the absence of news links on the platforms. Or they're still seeing news in the form of like screenshots and other repurposing of content. But there's also been a lot more information

non-news content that's been able to spread pretty quickly in the void. The New York Times found evidence that a ton of hyper-partisan and misleading content was flourishing online in the run-up to the vote. And Taylor Owen flagged another issue as well. One of the things we've seen during this election is widespread AI-generated fake images and videos of the political leaders.

And we think that's part of a function of both Meta scaling back their content moderation efforts, as well as blocking news and leaving this void in Canada. So what kind of misinformation, you know, fake news was spreading?

Oddly enough, it wasn't so much political content, but it was mostly stuff like crypto scams. Owen sent me a couple of examples like this one, which was an AI generated and manipulated video of Mark Carney, who's set up to be the next prime minister, pushing a fake investment program.

In just a month, your $350 Canadian dollars could turn into $12,000 Canadian dollars or even $20,000 Canadian dollars. This is the safest investment opportunity in Canada. Obviously, not a safe investment opportunity at all. Now, I should point out that Meta had a whole suite of tools for the election to push people towards authoritative information about the vote, as well as to clamp down on AI content that could mislead voters.

So why does this matter to us here in the U.S. and how we get information online? You know, Canada's law was modeled after one in Australia. And these platforms, Google, Meta, even X, and to some extent places like TikTok, have a major interest in making sure that the rest of the world, especially a profitable market like the U.S., does not follow the same route. And the experts I talk to say that's why Meta's really playing hardball here.

So Taylor Owen at McGill pointed to an effort in California last year to pass a bill to pay news publishers that got shelved when Google reached a payment deal. But Owen says Meta used the Canadian example as part of its lobbying to help kill the legislation. That was Marketplace senior correspondent Kimberly Adams.

We reached out to Meta for comment. They didn't get back to us before our deadline. But we've got general details on how they address misinformation on their platforms at MarketplaceTech.org. Daniel Shin produced this episode. I'm Megan McCarty Carino, and that's Marketplace Tech. This is APM. If there's one thing we know about social media, it's that misinformation is everywhere, especially when it comes to personal finance.

Financially Inclined from Marketplace is a podcast you can trust to help you get serious about your money so you can build a life you've always dreamed of. I'm the host, Janelia Espinal, and each week I ask experts important money questions, like how to negotiate job offers, how to choose a college that you can afford, and how to talk about money with friends and family. Listen to Financially Inclined wherever you get your podcasts.