We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Will the Supreme Court Save TikTok?

Will the Supreme Court Save TikTok?

2025/1/10
logo of podcast What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future

What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
E
Emily Baker White
L
Lizzie O'Leary
Topics
Lizzie O'Leary: 本期节目讨论了TikTok在美国面临的禁令及其对言论自由和国家安全的影响。最高法院正在审理此案,其裁决将对TikTok的未来以及美国政府对社交媒体平台的监管方式产生深远影响。本案涉及到第一修正案的权利,以及政府在保护国家安全的同时如何平衡言论自由。此外,本案还涉及到字节跳动与中国政府的关系,以及这是否构成国家安全风险。特朗普政府曾试图通过要求字节跳动出售TikTok来避免禁令,但由于中国政府的干预而失败。目前,TikTok正在争取法院的裁决,以避免被禁。如果法院维持禁令,这将是美国政府首次禁止主要的社交媒体应用,并可能对其他社交媒体平台产生影响。 Emily Baker White: 字节跳动和TikTok的论点是,禁止TikTok是对言论自由的侵犯。他们认为,TikTok的美国实体拥有第一修正案赋予的权利,而国会禁止该应用是对这些权利的不当限制。他们还指出,美国用户在TikTok上也有第一修正案赋予的权利。法院需要区分不同个体和实体的权利,并权衡政府限制言论的理由与言论自由之间的平衡。上诉法院认为,鉴于大型全球公司对信息生态系统的影响力,对言论进行一定程度的监管可能是必要的。政府则强调了外国干涉的风险,并试图将TikTok与冷战时期苏联对美国广播电台的控制进行类比。然而,即使在冷战时期,美国也没有禁止外国宣传。政府更关注的是谁拥有平台,而不是谁消费信息,因为限制谁拥有平台更容易站得住脚。一些用户提交了法庭之友状,认为只要用户知道存在中国的影响,就可以允许TikTok存在。TikTok可以添加一个标签,告知用户该平台可能受到中国政府的影响,这可能是政府采取的较不严格的措施。如果法院裁决不利于字节跳动,他们可能会再次考虑出售TikTok,但字节跳动不太可能违反中国政府的命令出售TikTok。 Emily Baker White: 我认为法院会关注审查级别,以及政府利益的迫切性和法律的精确性。法院对在线言论的理解至关重要,因为我们是在私有渠道上进行交流。缺乏透明度使得我们难以了解社交媒体平台如何选择向我们展示信息,这导致了信息生态系统中的问题。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why is the Supreme Court hearing a case about banning TikTok?

The Supreme Court is hearing the case because a law banning TikTok in the U.S. was signed in spring 2023 and is set to take effect on January 19th. The court must decide whether to block the law, which would prevent TikTok from operating in the U.S. The case involves significant First Amendment issues and national security concerns, given TikTok's ownership by the Chinese company ByteDance.

What is ByteDance's argument against the TikTok ban?

ByteDance argues that banning TikTok violates First Amendment rights, as it restricts the ability of TikTok creators and users to express themselves on the platform. They claim that content moderation decisions made by U.S. employees are protected speech under the First Amendment. Additionally, they argue that the ban is overly broad and not narrowly tailored to address national security concerns.

What role does the TikTok algorithm play in the legal battle?

The TikTok algorithm, particularly the 'For You' recommendation algorithm, is central to the legal battle. The Chinese government has imposed export restrictions on the algorithm, making it nearly impossible for ByteDance to sell TikTok to a U.S. company without Chinese approval. The algorithm is considered the core of TikTok's functionality, and its protection under Chinese law complicates any potential sale.

How does the U.S. government justify the TikTok ban?

The U.S. government justifies the ban by citing national security concerns, arguing that ByteDance could be compelled to share TikTok user data with the Chinese government. They compare the situation to Cold War-era fears of Soviet control over American media, emphasizing the need to protect against foreign interference in the U.S. information ecosystem.

What are the potential consequences if TikTok is banned in the U.S.?

If TikTok is banned, 170 million U.S. users would lose access to the app, and creators who rely on it for their livelihoods would face significant disruptions. The ban would also set a precedent for government regulation of social media platforms, potentially leading to future bans on other apps. This could reshape the online ecosystem and increase scrutiny of tech companies' relationships with foreign governments.

What is the significance of the Supreme Court's decision on TikTok for free speech?

The Supreme Court's decision will determine the balance between national security and free speech rights. If the court upholds the ban, it could open the door to further government regulation of speech on social media platforms. Conversely, striking down the ban would reinforce the protection of free speech online, limiting the government's ability to restrict access to platforms based on ownership or content concerns.

How does the Chinese government's involvement complicate the TikTok ban?

The Chinese government has imposed export restrictions on TikTok's recommendation algorithm, making it nearly impossible for ByteDance to sell the app to a U.S. company without Chinese approval. This complicates any potential sale or divestment, as ByteDance cannot comply with U.S. demands without violating Chinese law, effectively forcing TikTok to exit the U.S. market if the ban is upheld.

What is the role of the First Amendment in TikTok's legal defense?

TikTok's legal defense hinges on the First Amendment, arguing that banning the app restricts the speech rights of its U.S. users, creators, and employees. They contend that content moderation decisions and the platform's operation constitute protected speech. The case raises questions about how far the government can go in regulating speech on privately owned platforms, especially those with global reach.

What are the implications of the TikTok ban for other social media platforms?

If the TikTok ban is upheld, it could set a precedent for the U.S. government to regulate or ban other social media platforms, particularly those with foreign ownership or influence. This could lead to increased scrutiny of platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook, especially if they are perceived as being influenced by foreign governments or entities.

What is the timeline for the TikTok ban and potential sale?

The TikTok ban is set to take effect on January 19th, 2024. ByteDance has until then to either sell TikTok to a U.S. company or face a ban. However, the Chinese government's export restrictions on TikTok's algorithm make a sale highly unlikely. If the Supreme Court upholds the ban, TikTok will likely exit the U.S. market, leaving users and creators scrambling to transition to other platforms.

Chapters
This chapter introduces the Supreme Court case concerning a potential TikTok ban in the US, highlighting its significance and the potential implications for free speech and national security. The case's importance is emphasized by the Supreme Court's rarity in hearing such cases.
  • Supreme Court hears oral arguments on TikTok ban
  • Ban set to take effect January 19th
  • Supreme Court's involvement highlights the case's significance
  • 170 million Americans use TikTok

Shownotes Transcript

Will a First Amendment defense keep TikTok running in America? 

Guest: Emily Baker White, tech reporter for Forbes. 

Want more What Next TBD? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus) to get access wherever you listen.

Podcast production by Evan Campbell, Patrick Fort, and Cheyna Roth.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)