Ep. 130: The ugly truth is that ‘pro-Palestinian’ now means antisemitic
15:32 Share

And welcome to Jonathan Tobin Daily. I'm JNS Editor-in-Chief Jonathan Tobin. Thanks for joining me for another discussion on the most pressing issues in the Jewish law. Please like, subscribe, and give us good reviews when you listen to the show. Now let's get started.

As far as groups like Jewish Voice for Peace and the Nexix Project and their cheering section at The New York Times are concerned, what the Heritage Foundation is doing is pretty much the end of the world. The Washington think tank has been at the center of a set of democracy is doomed conspiracy theories floated by the American left for the last three years.

But the current indictment of Heritage isn't about Project 2025, their attempt to set forth a general agenda for what ultimately turned out to be the Trump 2.0 administration in the manner that such institutions on both ends of the political spectrum are always trying to do.

Instead, it is now being demonized for seeking to do something about the unprecedented surge in anti-Semitism in the United States that has been raging since the Hamas-led Palestinian Arab attacks on southern Israel on October 7th, 2023.

Herrich's Project Esther is an attempt to address a crisis for not just Jews, but for the country as a whole, which the Biden-Harris administration and much of the American Jewish establishment largely failed to address, let alone successfully fight. The Project Esther report was first published in October, weeks before the presidential election.

It was the focus of a major effort by The Times national investigative reporter Katie J.M. Baker and made clear its bias right in the title of the lengthy article published on May 18th called The Group Behind Project 2025 Has a Plan to Crush the Pro-Palestinian Movement, along with a video that summarized it.

The conceit of the piece is that Heritage's Project Esther is the script that the administration President Donald Trump has been following in its efforts to deal with the targeting of Jews on college campuses by pro-Hamas mobs since October 7th.

More to the point, the article claims that both Heritage and Trump aren't interested in anti-Semitism. Instead, it is alleged that they see the situation in academia as an opportunity to roll out a plan to impose authoritarian tactics that are a blueprint for a scheme to subvert democracy throughout the country.

To make that case, one has to accept the terminology and the premise of those who have been organizing the demonstrations, encampments, and building takeovers by students, faculty, administrators, and outside agitators chanting for Jewish genocide from the river to the sea and anti-Jewish terrorism, globalizing the Intifada, and saying that they aren't anti-Semitic.

According to the Times, the outpouring of support for the mass murder, rape, torture, burnings, and kidnapping and wanton destruction on October 7th, and then opposition to Israeli efforts to eradicate the Hamas terrorists and others who committed those atrocities, is merely pro-Palestinian activism.

The acts of violence and the openly anti-Semitic objectives, including the destruction of Israel and the genocide of its population, in addition to the language used by this movement, are bizarrely rationalized and justified as expressions of idealism and support for human rights. That is how the Times defines pro-Palestinian, and the widespread support for eliminating the one Jewish state on the planet is reported as mere criticism of Israel.

According to the newspaper, whose coverage was echoed in far-left outlets like Democracy Now! and the Islamist Al Jazeera, the opposition by both Heritage and the administration to the takeover of academia by those who think discrimination against Jews, but not other minority groups like African Americans or Hispanics, is an outrageous attempt to subvert democracy.

That has a familiar ring to it. Since 2022, the liberal press has been seeking to anathematize the scholars at Heritage for trying to envision what the next Republican administration could do to roll back the leftist woke tide threatening to replace the values of Western civilization and the American republic, the substance of Project 2025. They were falsely accused of hatching a plot to replace American democracy with a new form of Trumpian authoritarianism.

Project 2025 was a major Democratic talking point last year during the presidential campaign, and it obviously scared the Trump campaign enough for him to repeatedly disavow it. Strictly speaking, his denials of complicity in Heritage's project were entirely truthful.

The think tank's effort was launched at a point in time when it wasn't clear that Trump would be the GOP's presidential candidate in 2024. At that point, many of those who cheered the effort could have easily envisioned some of the proposals outlined in the report being implemented by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who, as the Times has noted, has already championed the same efforts to defend Jewish students and oppose woke ideology that is fueling anti-Semitism in his state.

Trump's campaign had no input on what Heritage published, but the agenda they were hoping that the next Republican president would act on was entirely in sync with Trump's understanding of the forces inside and outside the government that had done so much to sabotage and undermine his first term, as well as what needed to be done to thwart the takeover of American education by so-called progressives.

Once he won last year's election and began a second term determined to roll back the liberal-dominated administrative state and the way the woke catechism of diversity, equity, and inclusion, DEI, was harming American society and government, it was hardly surprising that he was acting on some of the same imperatives outlined in Project 2025.

As far as education is concerned, Heritage's Project Esther provides a blueprint for pursuing a plan designed to deny federal funds to schools that violate the law by enabling DEI-related racial discrimination and anti-Semitism that is fueled by the same toxic leftist myths about critical race theory, intersectionality, and settler colonialism that falsely label Jews and the State of Israel as white oppressors of people of color.

The surge in Jew hatred on campus is the direct result of these ideas. So, too, is the way foreign funders and students have helped spread this ideological war on Israel and its Jewish supporters. What is so interesting about the criticism of Project Esther and Trump's efforts to fight anti-Semitism is how its opponents frame the issue as an authoritarian effort to suppress entirely reasonable and even idealistic critics of Israel.

That's the substance of the Times article. Groups that are directly opposed to calling out anti-Semites are allowed to pose as representatives of enlightened Jewish opinion. That Jewish Voice for Peace, which has engaged in open anti-Semitism, including blood libels, and opposes Israel's existence in efforts to defend it, would be quoted in this manner. It's as grotesque as it is misleading.

The same is true of the newspaper's use of the Nexus Project, which has deceptively sought to redefine anti-Semitism in opposition to the widely accepted working definition encouraged by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance so as to make it safe for Jew haters to call for Israel's destruction without being labeled as hate mongers. The point of this argument is to legitimize anti-Zionism and to try to falsely argue that it's not the same thing as anti-Semitism.

That's a talking point regularly voiced by Jew haters. But it doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Suffice it to say that if you're willing to deny Jews rights that no one would think to deny to anyone else, such as the right to live in peace and sovereignty in their ancient homeland and to defend themselves, then you are engaging in discrimination against them.

Just as dishonest is the way that the Times deprecates Project Esther's willingness to refer to a Hamas support network and to Hamas support organizations, such as Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine, another font of anti-Semitic invective and goals.

In doing so, Heritage is simply being honest about this network of people and organizations that are devoted to the dismantling of Israel, the denial of Jewish rights in history, and the active targeting of American Jews for intimidation, silencing, and even violence, as we've seen on hundreds of college campuses in the last 19 months.

By seeking to call out these lawbreakers, whose activities would never be tolerated, let alone encouraged by college administrations, were they directed in any other minority group, Heritage and Trump are simply demanding enforcement of the law that forbids the funding of institutions that violate Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. And they want academic institutions to reject the toxic teachings that help normalize such aberrant conduct and hatred.

Taking such a position has nothing to do with suppressing free speech or destroying democracy, and any assertion to the contrary is simply an effort to confuse the issue and provide cover for anti-Semites and supporters of a terrorist group. Yet for so-called progressives, this is not just the thin edge of the wedge of right-wing Trumpian authoritarianism.

In order to discredit heritage, those supporting this anti-Semitic surge are seeking to gaslight the country and tell us that the people trying to defend Jews are the real anti-Semites. That's the substance not only of the time-slanted news coverage of this issue, but also of the writings of some of its left-wing columnists like Michelle Goldberg.

She hasn't made any secret about her own version of criticism of Israel, which involves not just falsely labeling its democratically elected government as authoritarian, but invoking opposition to Zionism and its existence as a Jewish state. In a gobsmacking analogy, Goldberg claims those behind Project Esther, like the admirable heritage scholar Victoria Coates, are somehow akin to anti-Semites of the past, like those who favored appeasement of the Nazis like Charles Lindbergh.

What Goldberg disingenuously ignores is that organizations like Heritage and even leaders like Trump are the ones fighting to save the liberal culture that allowed Jews to thrive in the United States, not the pro-Palestinians. It is progressives like her and other anti-Zionists who seek to destroy that culture and replace it with woke leftist ideologies that, as we've seen since October 7th, condone and justify anti-Semitism.

Part of that involves smearing Christians who support Israel as anti-Semites, who only want to bring on Armageddon, as did Detroit Pre-Press editorial page editor Nancy Kaffer, who echoed the Times' disgraceful attack on Project Esther as being linked to Jew hatred.

Boiled down to its essence, the leftist critique involves a willingness to see those who oppose the murder, rape, and kidnapping of Jews and the destruction of the Jewish state as bad people who should be viewed with distrust. At the same time, they want us to believe that those pro-Palestinian advocates are not haters of Israel and the Jews, even though they celebrate or rationalize October 7th and oppose efforts to prevent Hamas from repeating its crimes.

The label pro-Palestinian is equally dishonest. Anyone who wishes the Palestinian Arabs well would want them to be free of the rule of Islamists like Hamas, a terrorist group that preaches endless war on Jews in Israel, and seeks to sacrifice the lives of Palestinians. Genuine presence of the Palestinians would welcome Hamas's destruction and call for it to release the remaining hostages it took on October 7th and to surrender.

Those who wished the German people well in 1945 would not have called for a ceasefire with the Nazis that would allow the Adolf Hitler regime to survive World War II, but urged a swift Allied victory that would allow for that country to be rebuilt as a democracy. Still, that's what Project Esther's critics of the times and elsewhere are doing with respect to the baby killers and criminals of Hamas, as well as opposition to Israel's justified campaign to defeat them.

In this context, it's clear that the functional meaning of pro-Palestinian in 2025 America has nothing to do with the welfare of the residents of Gaza. A pro-Palestinian is now someone who opposes Israel's existence and supports, whether openly or tacitly, Hamas's war on Israel's existence.

Though they mendaciously label Israel as perpetrating a genocide of Palestinian Arabs, they are the ones advocating for the genocide of Israeli Jews. It is a sad fact that Palestinian nationalism, whether the version exemplified by Hamas or the equally intransigent one displayed by the Palestinian Authority, is inextricably tied to a century-old war on the Jews that they stubbornly refuse to end.

The same is true of those who support them from afar by labeling Israel's existence as illegitimate. It would be better for all concerned if this weren't so. But it is now undeniable that those who claim the title of pro-Palestinian are indistinguishable from anti-Semites in their rhetoric and intentions.

Liberal Jews who dislike Trump because of partisan leanings and who distrust Heritage for the same reasons should not be deceived by the effort to convince them to reject Project Esther and the administration's long-overdue enforcement of the law to protect Jewish students.

Project Esther is no conspiratorial threat to democracy. Instead, it is a much-needed clarion call for reading colleges and universities of Jew hatred that deserves to be cheered by those who care about Jewish safety. Its opponents are a clear and present danger to Jewish life that should be labeled for who they are, the allies and fellow travelers of a pro-terrorist movement that seeks Jewish genocide.

Thanks for listening. Please remember to tune in every day for Jonathan Tobin Daily Edition and every week for Think Twice, my full-length JNS TV program. Whether you're listening to us on any of the podcast platforms or on the JNS YouTube channel, please like and or subscribe to JNS, click on the bell for notifications, and give us good reviews. Please write to us at thinktwice at jns.org and let us know where you listen or watch the show and what you think about it. And remember,

Keep reading and thinking for yourself.