Is there an American oligarchy?
11:19 Share

Tech giant Elon Musk has been compared to an alien, has called himself a 3,000-year-old vampire, and was once the inspiration for the screen depiction of Marvel superhero Tony Stark.

But there is another descriptor following Musk around lately. They're clearly oligarchs. They have concentration of wealth and power. That was former Trump advisor Steve Bannon on his podcast, War Room. He later spoke to my colleague Steve Inskeep on Morning Edition. These oligarchs in the Silicon Valley, they have a very different view of how people should govern themselves. I call it techno-feudalism. Bannon's

Bannon has been feuding with Musk over immigrant access to work visas in the U.S., but he's not the only one to warn about the influence of billionaires like Musk. This whole idea may be the only point of agreement between Bannon and former President Joe Biden. Today, an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power, and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights, and freedoms.

Even before Musk was chosen to run Trump's newly created Department of Government Efficiency, he had deep investments in the federal government. Where both the federal government and the rest of the private sector have underinvested, Elon Musk has stepped in and really dominated.

That is NPR's tech correspondent, Bobby Allen. 60% of the country's electric vehicle chargers are controlled by Tesla. Another Musk company, SpaceX, operates the only U.S.-made rockets that can send astronauts to the International Space Station. So through Tesla and SpaceX, Musk's companies have been awarded, you know, hundreds of millions of dollars in federal contracts.

With the work Musk is doing, sometimes there's no other alternative. So the federal government just can't disentangle itself from the Musk empire. But Musk is not the only billionaire looking to work with the new administration. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and others have signaled their eagerness to cooperate with the new president.

Consider this. Oligarchy, a word that once more commonly referred to the super wealthy of Eastern Europe, has reached the shores of the U.S. What could an American oligarchy mean for the U.S. government and its citizens? From NPR, I'm Elsa Chang. This message comes from NPR sponsor, SADVA. Founder and CEO Ron Rudson shares the story of how he got started creating SADVA.

In 2007, 2008, I went out and I bought the most popular luxury mattresses. I tore them apart and I realized, based on the raw materials cost and the analysis that I had done, that I was able to sell that level mattress, but with a very affordable price. To learn more, go to s-double-a-t-v-a-dot-com-slash-n-p-r.

This message comes from Bluehost, making it easy to create a website fast. Their AI tools can help you customize, optimize, and launch in minutes and with 24-7 security, so you can focus on business, not hackers. Get your site launched at bluehost.com.

It's Consider This from NPR.

When Donald Trump was sworn in on Monday, he was flanked by billionaires Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg. Also on the dais were Apple CEO Tim Cook, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Bernard Arnault, owner of LVMH, which owns luxury brands like Dior and Louis Vuitton.

An American government closely aligned with money and power is something that outgoing President Joe Biden warned about in his farewell address, referring to an oligarchy taking shape in America.

Now oligarchy is a word more commonly associated with rich businessmen in Eastern Europe, but it is being used increasingly here in the U.S. We wanted to understand why, so we called someone who's written a lot about this. Jeffrey Winters is a professor of political science at Northwestern University and joins us now. Welcome.

Nice to be here. Thank you. Nice to have you. So I suppose we should just first define what an oligarchy is exactly. What is your understanding of the term and where does this term come from?

Yeah, you know, its current interpretation in the United States is quite negative. I teach a course at Northwestern, and on the very first day of this Oligarchs and Elites course some years ago, one of the students said, Russia has oligarchs and the United States has rich people. And there was this sort of interpretation, right? But it turns out the word oligarchs

has a lineage that goes back more than 2,500 years. And it goes back to Plato and Aristotle. And the meaning is simply persons who are super powerful because they are super wealthy. And it is the use of wealth power

As political influence that has always defined oligarchs throughout history. In other words, an oligarch is a extremely wealthy person. And there is the suggestion that that person uses their wealth for personal gain.

Well, okay, it might be personal, but it is the deploying of it in politics. So let me give you an example. There might be an oligarch who feels very strongly about abortion policy, but they're using that money power in the political system to sway the political outcome. That's one. But overwhelmingly, what you refer to is correct, which is,

The number one political objective of oligarchs throughout history has been wealth defense.

defending their fortunes from redistribution. Well, I want to get back to Biden's farewell address in which he talked about this rising oligarchy in America. And he likened today's super wealthy to the robber barons of the 19th and early 20th centuries, you know, to people like John D. Rockefeller, Cornelius Vanderbilt, J.P. Morgan. Is that fair comparison? Would you say that today's mega wealthy people

Yeah. And the thing that really stands out is that there was a visibility, an awareness of this kind of power being exerted politically at that time. And it kind of parallels the consciousness or awareness that people have now.

And so, yes, in between that long period, there have been oligarchs and there's been oligarchic power, but it hasn't been as visible and as agitating to people as it is now.

And partly that has to do with the fact that the Supreme Court had a decision in 2010, Citizens United, that said using your wealth as voice, as First Amendment expression, is completely legitimate and, for all intents and purposes, unlimited. And so the floodgate was opened for the use of this very unequal power. Yeah.

But let me ask you this. I mean, these so-called modern day oligarchs, they are, for the most part, quite successful people. You know, they're leaders in business. Their companies are a huge part of the American economy. Are there benefits, legitimate benefits to have them sharing their expertise and insights with government leaders or future leaders? Yeah.

Sure, absolutely. I mean, we're talking about people who are very, very talented. There's no doubt about it. They wouldn't be where they were unless they inherited their money. They wouldn't be where they were. But I don't think the United States should avoid drawing on very talented people. Of course it should draw on talented people. But one of the ways that's been done, Elsa, is that

In the past, if you were brought in, for example, from industry or from the finance sector, you had to sort of leave that position and come and serve and not still maintain your businesses. You had to be sort of shielded from doing things that were beneficial to your business. So those kinds of protections in the past have been very important.

Well, you've kind of been nipping at the edges of the answer to the next question. But let me just ask you straight out. What do you see as the biggest risk of a president being closely aligned with the billionaire class? Well...

I would just simply say it's not the first time. I mean, one of my messages is this is not new. It's only its visibility is new. Really, that is the fundamental message. The United States is a vastly more unequal society today than it was 50 years ago. And that's partly because the power of oligarchs has been so great that

For the last half century that the Rand Corporation, for example, estimates that over those 50 years, $50 trillion in wealth has been shifted upward.

to a very small number of people, while people at the average level of society have not benefited. But would you say that there is something unprecedented about this current administration in the sense of the kind of political influence you see from the mega, mega rich? Or is this just history replaying itself?

I think it is history replaying itself. I wouldn't go so far as to say absolutely unprecedented. But I would say definitely one of the reasons we in the country are talking about it is it is incredibly visible and people are concerned about the impact.

I mean, we saw the seating chart at inauguration. It is very visible. The billionaires were right there. Yeah, literally, literally right there. There is a risk to having that much visibility, which is we saw in the Gilded Age and the robber baron era that there was a backlash. So one of the strategies of oligarchs throughout history has been not to be too visible.

And that has worked well for them. And visibility has not always worked well. Well, I was just going to ask you, how do you see Trump's alliance with Musk and other powerful CEOs playing out? Do you see a backlash down the road from people who have just had enough with this? I'm going to deflect the question by saying political scientists have a hard enough time explaining what has happened. Really? You can't just get your crystal ball out?

No, I'm, you know, we're, we're, we're challenged just explaining what has happened. Fair enough. Yeah. Jeffrey Winters is a professor of political science at Northwestern University. He's also author of the upcoming book called Domination Through Democracy. Why Oligarchs Win. Thank you so much for joining us today. Thank you. It's a pleasure. Thank you.

This episode was produced by Mark Rivers with audio engineering by Hannah Glovna. It was edited by Courtney Dorning. Our executive producer is Sammy Yannigan. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Elsa Chang.

Support for NPR and the following message come from Washington Wise. Decisions made in Washington can affect your portfolio every day. But what policy changes should investors be watching? Washington Wise is an original podcast for investors from Charles Schwab that unpacks the stories making news in Washington and how it may affect your finances and portfolio. Listen at schwab.com slash Washington Wise.

Support for NPR and the following message come from IXL Learning. IXL Learning uses advanced algorithms to give the right help to each kid, no matter the age or personality. Get an exclusive 20% off IXL membership when you sign up today at ixl.com slash NPR.

Support for NPR and the following message come from IXL Online. Is your child asking questions on their homework you don't feel equipped to answer? IXL Learning uses advanced algorithms to give the right help to each kid, no matter the age or personality. One subscription gets you everything. One site for all the kids in your home, pre-K to 12th grade.

Make an impact on your child's learning. Get IXL now. And NPR listeners can get an exclusive 20% off IXL membership when they sign up today at ixl.com slash NPR.