We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode All Hell Breaks Loose When Maxwell Frost Insults Trump And Musk During House Oversight Hearing

All Hell Breaks Loose When Maxwell Frost Insults Trump And Musk During House Oversight Hearing

2025/2/27
logo of podcast Elon Musk Podcast

Elon Musk Podcast

AI Deep Dive Transcript
People
C
Christian Mortay
M
Maxwell Frost
W
Will Walden
未具名发言人
Topics
未具名发言人:我关注到一些联邦雇员工作效率低下,我认为应该解雇那些工作效率低下的员工。这不仅符合特朗普总统的利益,也符合美国公众的利益。我不认为共和党应该因为试图解决这个问题而受到攻击。 Christian Mortay:我理解提高政府效率的愿望,但我担心一次性解雇20万名试用期员工的做法。此外,我对特朗普政府试图私有化美国邮政服务以及由此可能造成的混乱表示担忧。我认为邮政服务是美国经济的基石,不应被私有化。 未具名发言人:我认为总统有权解雇任何机构的员工。此外,我认为民主党对Elon Musk和Doge团队削减浪费的批评是不合理的。我认为削减浪费、欺诈和滥用是必要的,因为美国债务高达36万亿美元。联邦员工的工作不值得他们的薪水,这些工作是由纳税人支付的,但纳税人已经无法负担。 Maxwell Frost:我认为我们应该关注特朗普和Elon Musk的腐败行为,而不是削减医疗补助等关键服务。我认为特朗普和Elon Musk利用公职谋取私利,这是一种对美国人民的欺诈。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Raise the rudder. Raise the sails. Raise the sails. Captain, an unidentified ship is approaching. Over. Roger. Wait, is that an enterprise sales solution? Reach sales professionals, not professional sailors. With LinkedIn ads, you can target the right people by industry, job title, and more. We'll even give you a $100 credit on your next campaign. Get started today at linkedin.com slash results. Terms and conditions apply.

This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance. Fiscally responsible. Financial geniuses. Monetary magicians. These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to Progressive and save hundreds. Visit Progressive.com to see if you could save. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states or situations.

Hi everyone and welcome back to the Elon Musk podcast. I'm your host, Will Walden. And if you're new here, this is a show all about Elon Musk and his groundbreaking work that he's doing with his various companies, including Tesla, SpaceX, The Boring Company, Neuralink, and of course, X.

And before we dive into today's episode, I wanted to share a quick insight from our show's analytics. It turns out that 45% of you listening right now are subscribed to the show, and thank you for that. But that means that 55% of you are not.

So I'm offering you a deal. I promise to do everything in my power to keep bringing you the latest and most interesting news about Elon Musk every single day and about his companies if you'll do me one favor and hit the subscribe or follow button on your podcast platform right now. That's it. Pretty simple and straightforward. It takes just a second for you, but it makes a huge difference for the show. Elon Musk news. Open from Wisconsin.

Just a comment, because I've heard similar comments from other members of your party. And of course, I love working with you guys. When Elon Musk or Doge or the president look into some of the federal employees

here, and we all know federal employees around here because maybe we have relatives, we have friends, whatnot, who work in the government. We hear some scare stories about people doing, and there are many hardworking federal employees. I'm glad we have good federal employees, but we hear anecdotal evidence of people doing very little.

If President Trump is the head of the executive branch and he discovers some employees doing very little, your position is apparently that we must keep these people going through the next budget or what have you and keep doing very little. It is obvious to me that both President Trump and the American public, upon discovering people who are doing very little work,

should ask that those employees be terminated. It's not something he does joyfully, but that is what you do if you are running the executive branch. And it is ridiculous that we have to have President Trump attacked and the Republican Party attacked when an effort is made to find employees who are doing very little. I am glad that President Trump has assigned people to look into this and

There are critical things you can say about the Republicans, but I wish you'd focus on that rather than trying to claim that every federal employee here in this town is necessary. Would you yield for a question?

Sure. Well, because you're bringing up that it should be okay and you see no problem with the Trump administration and with Doge doing this mass firing because, quote unquote, people are doing very little. How are they figuring out who's doing very little? I'm just curious. Well, you'll have to ask them, right? Oh, I'll have to ask them. So you're okay with being behind something that's happening, mass firing of people, firing of veterans? Congressman Grofman's time.

The president is in charge of the executive branch. I would assume at any given time people are being hired and being fired, probably more than have been the last 50 years around here, but they are. They are not going to report to Congress every time they feel a position is unnecessary. That would be absurd. Gentleman yields his time to Mr. Gosar. You know, Glenn, I'd like to ask you about

Wasn't there, this is not novel, having somebody like this. Wasn't Ezekiel Emanuel part of Obamacare? And I don't know what's more personal, our personal financial or our personal... All presidents have unconfirmed advisers. Thank you. That is not a new thing either. Will the gentleman yield? Chair, gentleman yields back, right?

Is it your position that the president can delete any agency? Oh, yeah. Joe, he yielded his time back. Chair, Mr. Christian Mortay from Illinois.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Just to very briefly address Mr. Grothman, I take you as being serious about wanting to improve efficiency in government and so forth. I think the issue is when you fire or give a pink slip to 200,000 probationary workers at one time, regardless of their efficiency, I think that's where there's a serious concern that's raised.

But I want to just address one other issue, Mr. Comer, and that's the U.S. Postal Service. On December 14th, 2024, The Washington Post reported that the Trump administration was considering at that time a move to privatize the Postal Service and push thousands of federal service employees out of their jobs in favor of a broad privatization of the agency's essential services.

Then just last week on February 20th, the Washington Post stated that the administration is preparing to, quote, dissolve the leadership of the USPS and absorb the independent mail agency into his administration. As you know, the Commerce Department potentially throwing trillions of dollars of e-commerce transactions into turmoil.

These reports are beyond troubling. And I respectfully request that you have a hearing again on the USPS. You had a very good hearing the other day where we were able to grill Mr. DeJoy. And I learned a lot. I think a lot of our members on both sides learned a lot. I think we need to have a hearing on this particular issue, as you know.

The USPS is the foundation of our $1.92 trillion mailing industry, led courageously by numerous veterans, letter carriers who deliver 44% of the world's mail.

More importantly, no private sector entity provides universal service across the nation. And without these letter carriers and others, more than 51.5 million households and businesses, especially in rural communities, Mr. Chairman, would have no guaranteed delivery. As a member of this panel tasked with oversight of the federal government's activities, including the USPS,

I believe it's essential, it's imperative that we have this hearing, sir. I know that you and the ranking member care deeply about the USPS and what the administration is proposing to do with the USPS, in my opinion, is illegal. It is against the framework of the USPS and we need to look into it. I yield back.

Gentlemen, before I recognize Ms. Green from Georgia, I'll just respond that when we see a proposal or something, we will...

have something either a briefing or a committee hearing or subcommittee hearing or, or something I'm interested as well, uh, to see what, uh, you mentioned potentially throw it into turmoil. Some would argue the postal service is already in turmoil right now with, uh, the, the delays in certain mail sorting facilities. So, uh, I, I agree with what you said. I know you're sincere and I think, uh, ranking member Conley and I have demonstrated, uh,

We want to support the Postal Service, and so when we find out more, we'll do something immediately, have a briefing or a subcommittee hearing or full committee hearing. Okay. Chair recognizes Ms. Green from Georgia. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Democrat colleagues across the aisle are complaining and pitching tantrums over Elon Musk and his Doge teams cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from

from the executive branch in the federal government. Claiming this is unconstitutional is an outright lie. Article 2 of the Constitution clearly states that the executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States of America

President Trump exercised that power by appointing Mr. Elon Musk as a special government employee. The president, via executive order, created the U.S. Doge service within the former U.S. digital service to implement the president's Doge agenda by modernizing federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency, productivity,

and productivity. Doge has been brought in exactly like the US Digital Service during President Obama's tenure.

This is not unconstitutional. 72% of Americans, this is on both sides of the aisles, you guys. These are people in your district. These are people in my district agree that we need to cut the ridiculous amount of waste, fraud, and abuse because Americans, all of us together, are $36 trillion in debt.

$36 trillion in debt is what should be unconstitutional, not doing everything we can to save the American people their hard-earned tax dollars. You can protest all you want outside of departments of this government. You can protest all you want, but the American people disagree with you.

You're protecting the bureaucracy. The bureaucracy is not a business. Those are not real jobs producing federal revenue. By the way, they're consuming taxpayer dollars. Those jobs are paid for by the American tax people who work real jobs, earn real income, pay

federal taxes and then pay these federal employees. Federal employees do not deserve their jobs. Federal employees do not deserve their paychecks.

And these are jobs that can be fired at will. But you want to know why? The American people can't pay for it anymore. We cannot afford it. $36 trillion in debt. If you want to make that your platform, your hill to die on, go ahead because 72% of Americans agree with DOGE, agree with cutting the waste, fraud, and abuse, and agree with what this committee is supposed to be about, oversight.

So continue your temper tantrums. I would love to win the midterms. Mr. Chairman, I yield back. TLA yields back. Chair, Mr. Frost from Florida. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I appreciate it. You know, in the mission statement that you've put out for this committee, it says to ensure that the economy, efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability of the federal government, which I think we all agree on, we all want to combat waste, fodder, and abuse. But the thing is that y'all are all looking in the wrong places.

You want to talk about making cuts to things like Medicaid, which, by the way, over 35 percent of all the children in this country are covered under Medicaid. Over 100,000 people in my district are covered under Medicaid. People like the grifter in chief Trump and President Musk are openly using their public offices to enrich themselves to the tune of billions of dollars.

So if we want to look at waste, fraud and abuse, which I'm down to do, why is there complete silence on the other side of the aisle about looking at the complete grifter that is the president of the United States and the richest man on the earth, which is looking into things like social security and different things like that? Why don't we investigate the real corruption? Hold off. Hold off. Point of order. Point of order. Hold off. Hold off. Hold off.

There was a point of order when you said something. Who asked for it? Mr. Higgins. I can say to my new Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, hey, find a keto-friendly restaurant nearby and text it to Beth and Steve. And it does without me lifting a finger. So I can get in more squats anywhere I can. One, two, three. Will that be cash or credit? Credit.

Galaxy S25 Ultra, the AI companion that does the heavy lifting so you can do you. Get yours at Samsung.com. Compatible with select apps. Requires Google Gemini account. Results may vary based on input. Check responses for accuracy.

Your data is like gold to hackers. They're selling your passwords, bank details, and private messages. McAfee helps stop them. SecureVPN keeps your online activity private. AI-powered text scam detector spots phishing attempts instantly. And with award-winning antivirus, you get top-tier hacker protection. Plus, you'll get up to $2 million in identity theft coverage, all for just $39.99 for your first year. Visit McAfee.com. Cancel any time. Terms apply.

I can refer to Elon Musk as the president. The first amendment has been suspended in this committee yet. Yeah, y'all were fine with... All right, suspend for a second. Just a few weeks ago. Before... Mr. Frost. Right after being elected president of the United States. Mr. Frost, before we proceed on all of this... Mr. Chairman. Would you like to... Hold on. I'm the chairman. I recognize Mr. Frost and will recognize you. Would you like to revise...

your remark with respect to improperly identifying the president of the United States? I'll say President Musk and Grifter and Chief Trump. Hey, Mr. Chairman, point of order. If I wanted to challenge someone to a fight, they would know it. Thank you. There's an extra fundraising video for him. Mr. Chairman, Mr. Chairman, I don't believe that Mr. Musk is protected by the rules of the House or the committee.

And no, we're looking at the disparaging the president now. But I don't believe Mr. Frost disparaged the president. I believe he disparaged Mr. Musk. Well, he did disparage Mr. Chairman. If Mr. Musk actually came here, then maybe the rule. All right. I heard no disparagement. I'll say something else. We'll save a lot of time. I'll say something else. OK. All right. We're going to let chair recognize Mr. Frost. You still have.

349, you're going to maybe revise the disparaging comment about the president because that's supposed to be our decorum here. It is supposed to be. President Musk and the President of the United States, Donald Trump, who is engaged in grifting of the American people, often use their public offices to enrich themselves.

Someone on the other side was just asking, how would you feel if you called someone else from the other side? Hold off, hold off, Mr. Frost, hold off. There's a pending motion for disparaging the president. So the motion was words taken down about disparaging the president. And the chair finds the words for the gentleman from Florida are not parliamentary because they constitute personalities toward the president, which...

If you sit in the House floor, that's always uttered by the presiding officer on the House floor. You cannot disparage the president of the United States. So, Mr. Chairman, would you please read back to us the words that were disparaging? Because I didn't hear them. If you're willing to request unanimous consent to withdraw the disparaging comments about President Trump, I guess you can disparage Elon Musk if you want. I will withdraw Drifter in chief and I will.

I will say the president's grifting because you spent the last two years saying President Biden was corrupt. I can say that Trump is grifting. What I will withdraw is calling him grifter-in-chief. The chair sustains the point of order and the words in question are ordered stricken from the transcript of this proceeding. So...

The member is barred from further participation. I challenge the ruling of the chair. I move to table. Okay, we have a motion to challenge ruling the chair, and then Mr. Gosar made a motion to table. Second. Conley's motion. So there's a motion in second to table Mr. Conley's motion.

The motion is not debatable. As many as are in favor of tabling signify by saying aye. Aye. All those opposed signify by saying no. No. Mr. Chairman, I ask for a recorded vote. A recorded vote is ordered. The clerk will call the roll. Mr. Jordan. Mr. Jordan votes yes. Mr. Turner. Mr. Gosar. Mr. Gosar votes yes. Ms. Foxx.

Mr. Grothman Mr. Grothman votes yes Mr. Cloud Mr. Cloud votes yes Mr. Palmer Mr. Palmer votes aye Mr. Higgins Mr. Higgins votes yes Mr. Sessions Mr. Sessions votes aye Mr. Biggs Mr. Biggs votes aye Ms. Mace Ms. Mace votes aye Mr. Fallon aye

Mr. Fallon votes aye. Mr. Donalds. Mr. Perry. Mr. Perry votes aye. Mr. Timmons. Mr. Timmons votes aye. Mr. Burchett. Ms. Green. Ms. Green votes aye. Ms. Boebert. Ms. Boebert votes aye. Ms. Luna. Mr. Langworthy. Mr. Burleson. Mr. Burleson votes aye. Mr. Crane.

Mr. Crane votes aye. Mr. Jack? Aye. Mr. Jack votes aye. Mr. McGuire? Mr. McGuire votes yes. Mr. Gill? Mr. Gill votes aye. Mr. Connolly? Nay. Mr. Connolly votes nay. Ms. Norton? No. Ms. Norton votes no. Mr. Lynch? No. Mr. Lynch votes no. Mr. Krishnamoorthy? No.

Mr. Krishnamoorthy votes no. Mr. Khanna. No. Mr. Khanna votes no. Mr. Mfume. No. Mr. Mfume votes no. Ms. Brown. No. Ms. Brown votes no. Ms. Stansbury. Absolutely not. Ms. Stansbury votes no. Mr. Garcia. Mr. Garcia votes no. Mr. Frost. No.

mr frost votes no miss lee miss lee votes no mr

Ms. Crockett, insulting people's appearance as well as trying to fight them isn't a problem. Point of order. It's a yes or no. We're so sad. Yes or no. That our order. Yes or no. Just skip her. Skip her. Skip her. Go to the next one. Go to the next one. The MSNBC anchor. Go to the next one. Don't count that. Go to the next one. Ms. Randall votes no. Mr. Subramaniam. Mr. Subramaniam votes no.

Ms. Ansari. Mr. Bell. Mr. Bell votes no. Ms. Simon. Ms. Simon votes no. Mr. Min. No. Mr. Min votes no. Ms. Presley. Ms. Tlaib. Nope. Ms. Tlaib votes no. Mr. Chairman. Yes. Mr. Chairman votes yes. This episode is brought to you by PDS Debt.

Struggling with credit cards, personal loans, medical bills, or collections? It's time to stop worrying about that high-interest debt you've got piling up. PDS Debt can help you start saving money immediately. Their platform can analyze your unique situation and create a plan to get you out of debt. There's no minimum credit score required, and it takes 30 seconds to get your results. With PDS Debt, you'll take back control of your finances. Get a free debt analysis in just 30 seconds at pdsdebt.com.

When the game tips off, the NBA action is just beginning on FanDuel, America's number one sportsbook. Because FanDuel is your home for NBA live betting, however you want to play. Now is the perfect time to join. Make every moment more with FanDuel, official sports betting partner of the NBA. 21 plus and present in Virginia. First online, real money wager only. $5 first deposit required. Bonus issued is non-withdrawable bonus bets which expire seven days after receipt. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Build a routine with Ollie that supports your wellness needs, like getting your daily vitamins and minerals with Ollie's Multigummies, or keeping your mood upbeat with all the vitamin D in Hello Happy. Give your gut health some support with probiotics, and wake up feeling refreshed after taking Ollie's sleep. Do wellness on your terms. Find Ollie at a Walmart or Target near you, or at Ollie.com. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

Mr. Chairman, how is Ms. Crockett recorded? Let's try this one more time. How is Ms. Crockett voted? Ms. Crockett is not yet recorded. No. I thank my colleague. Ms. Crockett votes no. Mr. Chairman, how is Mr. Kassar recorded? Mr. Kassar is not recorded. Mr. Kassar votes no.

Mr. Chairman, on this vote, the ayes are 20, the nays are 19. All right. The motion to table passes. I now recognize Mr. McGuire. I want to say it's despicable that this committee is going to silence me for bringing up Ross. Mr. Frost. Mr. Frost. Speak for the rest of the hearing. Making millions of dollars. Mr. Frost. Mr. Ranking Member, I'm going to have the Sergeant Arms remove him if he doesn't refrain.

Chair recognizes Mr. McGuire. Mr. Chairman, parliamentary inquiry. Mr. McGuire. Parliamentary inquiry. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I'd like to...

Hey, thank you so much for listening today. I really do appreciate your support. If you could take a second and hit this subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening on right now, I'd greatly appreciate it. It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never miss an episode. And each episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you caught up quickly. And please, if you want to support the show even more, go to patreon.com slash stage zero.

And please take care of yourselves and each other. And I'll see you tomorrow.