We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode BREAKING NEWS: Elon and DOGE lied to us all

BREAKING NEWS: Elon and DOGE lied to us all

2025/4/29
logo of podcast Elon Musk Podcast

Elon Musk Podcast

AI Deep Dive Transcript
People
主持人
专注于电动车和能源领域的播客主持人和内容创作者。
Topics
主持人:马斯克的Doge组织声称通过削减政府开支节省了巨额资金,但其说法缺乏充分证据支持。虽然Doge组织声称节省了2000亿美元的纳税人资金,并公布了部分具体交易,但大部分节省金额缺乏独立可验证的证据。BBC Verify对Doge组织公布的数据进行了审查,发现其文档和证据存在严重不足。 Doge组织最初的目标是通过积极措施削减浪费、消除膨胀开支以及取消前任政府遗留下来的不必要项目来节省开支。然而,其公布的节省金额存在严重缺口,仅约40%的数字有具体交易可查。此外,美国媒体的审查还发现了Doge组织会计方面的错误,例如将800万美元的合同错误地报告为80亿美元。 Doge组织承认存在错误,并表示正在努力上传所有必要的收据和文件,但目前只有约30%的总节省金额有收据可查。许多节省数字并非基于实际停止的支出,而是基于未来数年合同的预计最大值,这导致实际节省金额与公布数字之间存在巨大差异。 对Doge组织声称的四大节省项目进行仔细审查后发现,实际数字与公布数字之间存在差异。例如,Doge组织声称取消一项在德克萨斯州建造收容移民儿童设施的合同节省了29亿美元,但实际节省的金额可能更接近1.53亿美元。另一个例子是,Doge组织声称取消国税局与Centennial Technologies公司之间的合同节省了19亿美元,但该合同在Doge组织介入之前就已经被终止。 此外,Doge组织声称取消国防部与A1 Fed Impact公司之间的一份24亿美元的IT服务合同节省了17.6亿美元,以及取消美国国际开发署对Gavi的拨款节省了17.5亿美元,但这些说法都缺乏证据支持。 Doge组织节省开支的报告的可信度至关重要,因为这些说法被用于政治上,以证明对联邦部门和预算进行全面改革是合理的。缺乏透明度会削弱公众对联邦机构的信任,并可能掩盖对数百万人依赖的基本服务的削减。不准确或夸大的数字可能会为批评者提供攻击马斯克及其背后更广泛的政治使命的理由。 虽然Doge组织做了大量工作,但如果其文件跟不上其说法,其信誉可能会受到无法弥补的损害。在如此短的时间内削减数百亿美元的开支,这在历史上几乎是前所未有的成就,会面临巨大的后勤和官僚挑战。马斯克不断变化的节省目标(从2万亿美元到1500亿美元)也表明,即使在Doge组织内部,也存在不确定性。 取消合同往往会产生隐性成本,例如提前终止的罚款、法律挑战或需要以更高的价格重新谈判未来的合同。政府合同本身的性质也增加了复杂性,仅仅取消尚未完全启动的合同并不总是意味着立即减少预算。几个监督组织呼吁对Doge组织报告的节省进行独立审计,这需要数月的时间才能得出可靠的数字。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

This episode is brought to you by Peloton. Everyone has a reason to change. Growing old, heartbreak, a fresh start, whatever it may be. Peloton is here to get you through life's biggest moments with instructors that speak your language and workouts that move to your own rhythm. Peloton's Tread and All Access membership help you set your targets, track your progress, and get stronger, making your fitness goals a reality. Find your push. Find your power. Peloton. Visit onepeloton.com.

Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile with a message for everyone paying big wireless way too much. Please, for the love of everything good in this world, stop. With Mint, you can get premium wireless for just $15 a month. Of course, if you enjoy overpaying, no judgments, but that's weird.

Okay, one judgment. Anyway, give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch.

Hey, everyone. Welcome back to the Elon Musk podcast. I'm thrilled to share some exciting news with you. Over the next two weeks, we're evolving. We'll be broadening our focus to cover all the tech titans shaping our world. You'll still get the latest insights on Elon Musk, plus so much more. So stay tuned for our official relaunch coming soon. Now let's get into this episode. The number is staggering. $200 billion.

That's what Elon Musk's doge claims it has saved the American taxpayers since President Donald Trump returned to the White House. But one unavoidable question now grips anyone hearing the claim. How much of it is real? How much is smoke and mirrors? And what evidence is there behind these extraordinary figures?

Question that matters deeply because the size of the claim implies a government overhaul of historic proportions, reshaping where billions of dollars flow every single month. Now, if Doge's numbers are even mostly true, it would suggest an era of unprecedented fiscal tightening. And if not, it raises concerns about transparency and accountability at the highest levels, understanding the reality behind these claims

It's not just a matter of curiosity, though. When Elon Musk introduced Doge shortly after Trump's inauguration, the concept was simple, get aggressive, cut waste, eliminate bloated spending, and cancel unnecessary projects left over from past administrations.

The problems were huge. The scope is large, and its ambitions are clear. Qatar gets contracts, grants, and federal leases, while also aiming to slash fraud and trim the government workforce. Doge has positioned itself as the muscle behind Trump's push to overhaul Washington's spending habits. Now, Doge publishes a running tally of its reported savings

on its official website, where it claims to have reached $160 billion in savings as of April 20th. Yet only about 40% of that figure is broken down into specific transactions that can be independently reviewed. Analysts from the BBC Verify took a closer look at these numbers and found serious gaps in documentation and evidence supporting these claims.

Now, in October of last year, Elon Musk raised eyebrows when he pledged to cut at least $2 trillion from the federal budget. However, the goal was later scaled down. By April 10th, Musk was speaking about aiming for about $150 billion in savings by the end of 2026, concentrating efforts on reducing fraud,

and waste. That's a huge difference. Now, the revised figure still represents an immense amount of money, though, especially considering federal budget for the last fiscal year was $6.75 trillion. Now,

We pulled some data directly from Doge's site on April 23rd and examined the reported savings from canceled contracts, grants, and leases. The findings reveal that approximately half of the itemized savings had a corresponding document or some form of cited evidence. This leaves a substantial portion of claimed savings essentially undocumented. Moreover, scrutiny from U.S. media revealed mistakes within Doge's accounting altogether. For instance,

The agency had boasted about an $8 billion saving from canceling an immigration contract, when in reality, the contract's full value was only $8 million. Now, Doge acknowledged the errors and stated that they're working to upload all necessary receipts and documentation in a digestible and transparent manner. Now, currently, receipts accounting for only about 30% of total savings are available,

with some listed as unavailable for legal reasons. Now, understanding how Doge calculates its savings is key to evaluating its claims, though. Many savings figures are based not on actual expenditures that were stopped, but on projected maximum contract values extending years into the future.

The contracts often list an upper spending limit, not an actual or expected expense. The real costs are only tallied after the contract is actually completed. Now, a close examination of Doge's four largest claimed savings reveals discrepancies between the numbers in reality. These four savings supposedly added up to $8.3 billion dollars.

However, when comparing the available documentation and consulting experts, the actual figures appear far lower. The biggest individual saving, Doge claims, is $2.9 billion from canceling a facility construction contract intended to house migrant children in Texas. The contract, signed during the Biden administration, had a scheduled end date of 2028.

Yet it was reviewed annually, meaning there was no guarantee of full renewal. And according to a source, the $2.9 billion figure was based on speculative maximum figures that would never have been realized. The actual immediate saving from halting the contract was closer to $153 million, not $2.9 billion. Now, operational costs were $18 million per month,

and the site never reached its intended maximum occupancy. In the second case, Doge claimed to save $1.9 billion by canceling a contract between the IRS and an IT company, which is Centennial Technologies. Now the linked FPDS document showed a maximum value of $1.9 billion, but reported $0 in actual spending so far.

Now, this doesn't necessarily mean that no money was spent, as government departments often delay updating expenditure and contract databases. Furthermore, the CEO of Centennial Technologies told the New York Times that the deal was already terminated during the Biden administration before Doge could take credit for canceling it.

A third largest saving listed by Doge involved canceling a $2.4 billion IT services contract with A1 Fed Impact for the Department of Defense.

Doge claimed $1.76 billion in savings from this cancellation. However, again, there is no evidence of any spending against the contract at the time it was terminated. It remains unclear how Doge calculated the $1.76 billion figure, and neither the Pentagon nor the contractor has provided any clarity on this matter. And they should know. They were part of it. Now, the fourth claim.

large savings here. 1.75 from Doge canceling USAID grant to Gavi, an international health organization that works to improve vaccine access. According to USAspending.gov, linked page confirmed that $880 million had been paid to Gavi in three installments during the Biden administration. And their spokesperson,

said that they were unaware of any termination notice. Without confirmation from USAID, it remains a mystery how Doge arrived at its $1.75 billion saving figure.

Now, the credibility of Doge's reporting savings matters because these claims are being used politically to justify sweeping changes to federal departments and budgets. When savings are exaggerated or poorly documented, it undermines public trust and raises questions about how government reforms are being communicated to the public. And for everyday Americans, the operations of Doge have real-world effects.

Cutting federal spending can impact everything from government services, health programs, and infrastructure projects. The grants for research and also education too. A misleading theme

This episode is brought to you by Chevy Silverado. When it's time for you to ditch the blacktop and head off-road, do it in a truck that says no to nothing. The Chevy Silverado Trail Boss. Get the rugged capability of its Z71 suspension and 2-inch factory lift. Plus, impressive torque and towing capacity thanks to an available Duramax 3-liter turbo diesel engine. Where other trucks call it quits, you'll just be getting started. Visit Chevy.com to learn more.

I think you're on mute. Workday starting to sound the same? I think you're on mute. Find something that sounds better for your career on LinkedIn. With LinkedIn Job Collections, you can browse curated collections by relevant industries and benefits, like FlexPTO or hybrid workplaces, so you can find the right job for you. Get started at LinkedIn.com slash jobs. Finding where you fit. LinkedIn knows how.

"Misleading claims of cost savings could mask reductions in essential services that millions depend on." And moreover, if DOJA's figures continue to be presented without any solid evidence or data, it could erode the standard of accountability the citizens expect from federal agencies. Transparency in spending and in cuts is crucial for ensuring that the government acts responsibly with public money.

And beyond the practical impact, the political ramifications are equally important. Musk's leadership of Doge has become a central symbol for Trump's return to a smaller government platform. Inaccurate or exaggerated figures risk providing critics with ammo to attack not only Musk, but the broader political mission behind it, and also Trump.

Doge has done extensive work. Don't get me wrong. And according to its site, it's reviewing thousands of contracts, grants, and leases with a goal of trimming operational expenses across all departments. But if the documentation does not keep pace with the claims, its credibility could suffer irreparable damage. But it's worth noting that cutting government spending at the scale that Doge claims

would be an almost unprecedented achievement. Historic efforts to slash federal budgets, such as during Reagan, often took years and encountered strong political resistance. Attempting to achieve hundreds of billions in cuts within months raises logistical and bureaucratic challenges that cannot be glossed over. Now, adding to the skepticism are Musk's shifting targets for savings. Going from a $2 trillion target

to just $150 billion in a matter of months suggests that even within Doge, there's uncertainties. Elon didn't look at the data before he made the claim. And as an engineer, you never underproduce and overpromise. There's uncertainties about what is achievable from Doge now. Now, further complicating matters,

The cancellation of contracts often carries hidden costs, such as penalties for early termination, legal challenges, or the need to renegotiate future contracts at higher prices.

DOJA's reported savings do not appear to account for these potential side effects. And another layer of complexity comes from the nature of government contracts themselves. Many contracts are written with future contingencies in mind. Simply canceling a contract that had not yet been fully activated does not always equate to an immediate budget reduction despite appearances.

Several watchdog groups have called for an independent audit of DODA's reported savings. Such a review would likely require months of detailed analysis, contract by contract, grant by grant, before producing a reliable figure. And until that happens, the exact amount saved remains uncertain.

As of now, the official Doge site lists $160 billion in estimated savings. But with less than half of those savings traceable to public documents and multiple examples of accounting discrepancies, we don't really know what's going on behind the scenes at Doge.

Hey, thank you so much for listening today. I really do appreciate your support. If you could take a second and hit subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening on right now, I'd greatly appreciate it. It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never miss an episode. And each episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you caught up quickly. And please, if you want to support the show even more, go to patreon.com slash stage zero.

And please take care of yourselves and each other, and I'll see you tomorrow.