Elon Musk using X to recruit baby mommas
10:49 Share

Hey, everyone. Welcome back to the Elon Musk podcast. I'm thrilled to share some exciting news with you. Over the next two weeks, we're evolving. We'll be broadening our focus to cover all the tech titans shaping our world. And with that, our show will become stage zero. You'll still get the latest insights on Elon Musk, plus so much more. So stay tuned for our official relaunch at stage zero coming soon. So for the past

past four or five years, I've been bringing you in-depth, no-nonsense insights from the world of Elon Musk. But I need your help to keep this show alive and growing. If you love what you hear, consider supporting Stage Zero on Patreon at patreon.com slash stagezeronews. By joining our Patreon community, you'll get exclusive content, early access to some episodes, and

and a chance to shape future topics. Everyone has a voice and your support goes directly into making this show absolutely better. And it helps me keep bringing you the content that you enjoy every single day. If you're getting value from Stage Zero News, becoming a patron is the best way to make sure this journey keeps going. So let's make the next five years even bigger together. There's a link in the show notes below.

just for you. Elon Musk, who has publicly famed declining birth rates as one of humanity's gravest threats, is now taking personal action to counter that problem, but not in the abstract. According to reports from the Wall Street Journal, Musk has turned his own social media platform, X, into a pipeline for identifying women who may be open to having his children,

He's reported to privately message content creators, influencers, and conservative personalities on the site, engaging in conversations that sometimes lead to financial agreements, secret pregnancies, and long-term agreements. Now, what's becoming increasingly clear is that this isn't about family in the traditional sense. It's more of a program. And the central to that program is Musk's belief that he has both the obligation to

and the means to repopulate what he sees as a declining civilization. Now, Musk has at least 14 known children with the actual number possibly higher, according to sources familiar with his private life. And these children are spread across four women, some of whom have never been publicly identified.

His strategy has been described by insiders as calculated, almost contractual in nature. One woman reportedly received $15 million up front from Elon Musk, in addition to $100,000 a month in support until her child turns 21.

These are real financial agreements tied to real children, according to the Wall Street Journal. Now, in that context, it's difficult to frame these relationships as traditional romantic partnerships. They're bound by strict nondisclosure agreements managed through legal teams and at times overseen by Jared Birchall, Musk's longtime associate and head of his family office.

Mothers may receive security details, real estate in major cities, and continued monthly payments. But they also reportedly agree to keep Musk's name off birth certificates and maintain a level of discretion that limits what they can share publicly.

The goal, it appears, is not only privacy, but control of the situation. Now, Ashley St. Clair's case brings this dynamic into sharper focus. She's a 26-year-old conservative commentator. St. Clair revealed in early 2025 that she had a child with Elon Musk.

conceived in January 2024 and born that September. The relationship reportedly began with a DM from Musk on X, eventually turning into a romantic connection that led to pregnancy. Musk provided her with a Manhattan apartment and private security, but insisted the child's existence remain confidential. Eventually, the arrangement deteriorated and

and St. Clair now seeks sole custody. She's accused Elon Musk of pulling back financial support as a method of influence and of only seeing their son three times since his birth.

In legal documents, the child was referred to by initials, but his real name, Romulus, was later revealed. This too fits a pattern. Musk refers to his children collectively as a legion, evoking Roman military organization. The implication isn't subtle, though. He sees his expanding family as a structured, purpose-driven force.

The motivation behind all of this comes back to a longstanding theme in Musk's public statement: population collapse. He believes declining birth rates present a larger threat to human civilization than climate change. In a 2022 tweet, he wrote, "Population collapse due to low birth rates is a much bigger risk to civilization than global warming." Now, Musk hasn't let that concern remain theoretical. He's moved from words into action.

This isn't just about solving a global crisis though. Musk applies to seem logic to his family expansion as he does to building rockets or cars. He identifies a problem, calculates the mechanics of a solution and begins executing

His unique position as the owner of a major social media platform is he can directly message potential partners without intermediaries. And from there, discussions can shift toward parenthood, support, and confidentiality, all with legal frameworks in place to protect the whole process.

Now, financial agreements are a critical part of this system. In one example reported by the Wall Street Journal, a woman was offered $15 million up front, followed by $100,000 every month until the child reached legal adulthood. Other reported cases include Musk covering housing costs, providing apartments in major cities, and paying for security details. Now, these deals often come with NDAs shielding the agreement for public disclosure.

This is all supported by legal filings, investigative reports, and testimony from involved parties. In addition to the upfront payments, Musk's control over the financial lifeline appears to be a recurring element. St. Clair claims that Musk reduced child support to maintain control over her behavior, and the offer of security and support in her account came with strings attached. Once she sought public recognition of their child in independent custody, the benefits began to diminish.

Tiffany Fong, a cryptocurrency influencer, described a similar experience. Musk allegedly propositioned her over DMs about having his child, despite never meeting in person. When she declined and shared her experience privately with others, Musk unfollowed her. This caused a measurable drop in her income from X's revenue-sharing program, where she had previously made over $21,000 in two weeks. Now, Musk did not respond publicly to the allegation, but the financial drop-off followed soon,

after their online disengagement. Now, these cases suggest a method. Use X to access and find potential mothers, offer them financial security, and manage the narrative through legal mechanisms. It's an approach that blends influence, resources, and privacy as a little bit scummy, all in service of a long-term reproductive goal for Elon Musk. Now, the

Now, the power dynamics are very clear. Musk holds financial leverage, legal infrastructure, and the public platform to shame them. The women, in exchange, may gain material support, but lose the ability to control their own story and their child's story. And beyond personal relationships, Musk has also integrated his population goals into corporate policy.

To companies like Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and The Boring Company, he has promoted financial benefits for employees who have children. Musk's foundation has echoed this model, supporting families and encouraging pronatal decisions. These aren't passive stances, though. They're active incentives that mirror his own personal beliefs.

Now, Musk has also praised national policies aimed at increasing birth rates. He publicly supported Hungary's tax release program for mothers with multiple children. It aligns with the broader trend. Musk wants systems, not just individual decisions, that encourage higher reproduction. He applies logic at home, at work, and in the public policy space.

Now, there's also the matter of control for this. In multiple reported cases, Musk has worked to keep his name off birth certificates, control the flow of child support, and manage the public story. These steps suggest that Musk does not view his role as one of co-parenting, but rather as that of a benefactor, a kind of architect designing a system with controlled variables. His behavior raises legal and ethical questions. Are these consensual relationships, or do they become transactional,

under the weight of financial imbalance? Can support be considered generous if it's withdrawn during custody disputes? And what does it mean for a billionaire to use a public platform as a private recruiting tool for children? Now, the answers remain largely in the hands of Elon Musk. The mothers involved

mainly under NDAs, are bound by court agreements and they can't say anything. But Musk continues to promote pronatal values in interviews and on social media posts while rarely acknowledging specific children or arrangements. And his followers, some are supportive, others are skeptical. Watch as he builds a gigantic family, not just for companionship, but for continuity. Now, he uses X to recruit moms,

and offer financial contracts. And it's not a side story. He's the main character. It's central to his broader vision of survival, legacy,

and control over these people. Hey, thank you so much for listening today. I really do appreciate your support. If you could take a second and hit this subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening on right now, I'd greatly appreciate it. It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never miss an episode. And each episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you caught up quickly. And please, if you want to support the show even more, go to patreon.com

slash stage zero. And please take care of yourselves and each other, and I'll see you tomorrow.