The "language of lying" segment was written by Valerie Fridland, a professor of linguistics at the University of Nevada in Reno and the author of "Like, Literally, Dude): Arguing for the Good in Bad English." )A version of this story originally appeared on Psychology Today), and you can find her at valeriefridland.com).
đź”— **Share your familect recording in a **WhatsApp chat.)
đź”—Â Watch my LinkedIn Learning writing courses).
đź”—Â Subscribe to the newsletter).
🔗 **Take our advertising survey). **
đź”—** Get the edited **transcript.)
🔗 **Get Grammar Girl books). **
đź”— Join Grammarpalooza (Get texts from Mignon!): https://joinsubtext.com/grammar) or text "hello" to (917) 540-0876.
| HOST: Mignon Fogarty
| VOICEMAIL: 833-214-GIRL (833-214-4475).
| Grammar Girl is part of the Quick and Dirty Tips podcast network).
| Theme music by Catherine Rannus).
| Grammar Girl Social Media Links: YouTube). TikTok). Facebook).Threads). Instagram). LinkedIn). Mastodon).
Â
Â
References for the "Linguistics of Lying" segment
Arciuli, J., Mallard, D., and Villar, G. (2010). “Um, I can tell you’re lying”: Linguistic markers of deception versus truth-telling in speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(3), 397–411.
Bond, C., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234.
Hauch, Valerie, Iris BlandĂłn-Gitlin, Jaume Masip, and Siegfried L. Sporer. (2014) Are Computers Effective Lie Detectors? A Meta-Analysis of Linguistic Cues to Deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19:4, 307-342.
Fuller, Biros, D. P., & Wilson, R. L. (2009). Decision support for determining veracity via linguistic-based cues. Decision Support Systems, 46(3), 695–703.
Verschuere, B., Bogaard, G., and Meijer, E. (2020). Discriminating deceptive from truthful statements using the verifiability approach: A meta-analysis. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 35, 374–384.