Today we're bringing you the Supreme Court of Canada's Dissenting opinion in R v Barton. The dissent took a slightly different position and would have had the accused retried for murder as well as manslaughter. To hear a broader context and Karly and Zach's thoughts on the case, head back to the previous episode.
CW: This case is about the sexual assault and murder of an Indigenous woman in Alberta. If this content is not for you, please choose another episode. Take care when listening.
Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!
Link to Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2019/2019scc33/2019scc33.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAKUiB2IEJhcnRvbgAAAAAB&resultIndex=1
Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii Connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at [email protected]
While you're here, check out our team!
Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/)
Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/)
Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!
