We're back at it with the oft cited and accessibly written concurring opinion of McLachlin CJ in the SCC decision of Machtinger v HOJ Industries. This concurring decision, which contains an explanation of implied terms, is still cited in 1L contract law classes today and was heavily cited by the SCC in Uber v Heller. To hear Zach and Karly's thoughts on the case, head on back to the previous episode!
Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!
Link to Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1992/1992canlii102/1992canlii102.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAQbWFjaHRpbmdlciB2IGhvagAAAAAB&resultIndex=1
Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii Connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at [email protected]
While you're here, check out our team!
Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/)
Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/)
Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!
