We're back at it with the oft cited and accessibly written concurring opinion of McLachlin CJ in the SCC decision of Machtinger v HOJ Industries. This concurring decision, which contains an explanation of implied terms, is still cited in 1L contract law classes today and was heavily cited by the SCC in Uber v Heller. To hear Zach and Karly's thoughts on the case, head on back to the previous episode!

Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!

Link to Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1992/1992canlii102/1992canlii102.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAQbWFjaHRpbmdlciB2IGhvagAAAAAB&resultIndex=1

Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii Connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at legallistening@gmail.com

While you're here, check out our team!

Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/

Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/

Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!

Episode 55: Machtinger v HOJ Industries Part II (Concurring) 14:19 Share

Legal Listening

Shownotes Transcript

Episode 55: Machtinger v HOJ Industries Part II (Concurring)