Frailmales
35:54 Share

<context>Frailmales 本周，我们为您带来两个关于小家伙们试图做大事情的故事。 首先，自称为动物格林奇制作人的贝卡·布雷斯勒向我们介绍了或许是唯一让她心暖的生物：一只蟋蟀。更具体地说，是一只雄性蟋蟀。这是一个关于一只微小的罗密欧昆虫试图寻找伴侣的故事，以及它为了让自己的召唤被听到而付出的巧妙努力。 我们故事的英雄

特别感谢斯蒂芬·斯潘和乔舒亚·巴克斯特在坎伯兰大学的多里斯和哈里·维斯大学图书馆，以及乔治亚理工学院图书馆的艾莉森·雷诺兹。还要感谢里克·贝尔，以及斯科特·拉尔森，他写了一本关于这场比赛的书，名为《坎伯兰：历史上得分最高的足球比赛的真实故事》。最后，非常感谢我们的录音同步员安布里尔·克拉奇菲尔德对本集的帮助。 如果您仍然对这场史诗般的足球比赛感兴趣，请务必查看体育作家乔恩·博伊斯的这段精彩而搞笑的视频。 最后，不要忘记查看《死亡、性与金钱》。我们推荐一集名为《艰难》，深入探讨我们与勃起功能障碍的关系，以及为治疗它而开发的药物。 通过今天成为《实验室》的会员来支持Radiolab。 Radiolab在YouTube上！赶快收看新剧集，听听我们档案中的经典节目。此外，发现我们过去做过的其他酷炫事物——如迷你系列、音乐视频、短片和动画、幕后特辑、Radiolab现场表演等等。快来看看，探索并订阅吧！ 在这里下载盲文准备文件 (https://zpr.io/YPQjmqjec5g7) </context> <raw_text>0 Radio Lab is supported by Progressive Insurance. Whether you love true crime or comedy, celebrity interviews or news, you call the shots on what's in your podcast queue. And guess what? Now you can call the shots on your auto insurance too with the Name Your Price tool from Progressive. It works just the way it sounds. You tell Progressive how much you want to pay for car insurance and they'll show you coverage options that fit your budget.

Get your quote today at Progressive.com to join the over 28 million drivers who trust Progressive. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. Price and coverage match limited by state law.

At Leidos, a brilliant mind is smart, but a brilliant team is smarter. That's why we collaborate to create even smarter technology solutions in national security and health. Leidos, making smart smarter. Listener supported. WNYC Studios. Wait, you're listening. Okay. All right. Okay. All right. You're listening to Radio Lab.

Radio from WNYC.

Hey, I'm Latif Nasser. I'm Lulu Miller. This is Radiolab. Okay, should we do this thing? Yeah. And today, we're going to start with a story from our producer, Becca Bressler. How did you stumble across this? How did this little guy possess your brain? Okay. I basically, it was my turn to pitch something. And I was in like a dark Airbnb in Portland with my friend in January and just feeling like totally lost.

lost for inspiration. So I did a thing I actually never do when I'm looking for pitches, which is look for an animal story. Because I actually, I don't even really like animals that much. Like, I honestly am one of those people that I think pets dogs because I'm afraid of being judged if I don't, if I don't bend down and pet the dog. So like, that's...

That's how like animal agnostic like is apathetic like I actually am. Anyways, so like I'm Googling animal like science news. Clicked the animal...

And came across an article about it. It's just this little creature that to me struck me as a total genius. And that's what I want to tell you about. All right. I'm sort of still eating my breakfast. Also, for some balanced reporting, I dragged in animal lover producer Annie McEwen. Hello.

Okay, so this animal lives in these shrubby fields. A bushy kind of open landscape. In India, just outside Bangalore. It is quite an isolated area. This is Ritik Deb. He's an evolutionary ecologist at Vishwa Bharti University. In West Bengal, India. And he says to find this animal, you go out in the evening. In complete darkness. And walk out into the center of this field and just stop.

stand completely still and you wait for their song. Generally, on an average, maybe 10 minutes or so. The song of... A cricket. A cricket? Yeah. Really? Yeah. Hey! I mean, I don't know if I'd call that a song. Like, it's like a chirp.

No, no, no. I'm going to call it a song. All right. Stick with me here. Okay. All right. Fine. Fine. Okay. So these crickets are called tree crickets. And just to give you a visual, they're sort of a translucent green. They've got little tiny wings. They're around one centimeter long. One centimeter. So like your pinky finger. Half of the pinky finger, I would say. So like a pinky fingernail. Slightly bigger than that. Slightly bigger than a pinky fingernail, depending on who you are. Is it hard to find...

It depends on where the cricket is. Once it happens that we hear a cricket and every time we go to a location, it feels like it's calling from behind us. We turn, we go to another location. Then it strikes us that it's calling from within our backpack.

Oh my gosh. And their song that Ritik uses to track these little guys down, that is the thing that makes them so interesting. Yeah. It's a hugely costly phenomenon. Ritik explained that the male crickets, who are the ones who sing the songs, they do this to attract mates. And every night a male cricket sings, it can lose up to 20% of its body weight.

Whoa. It like sings itself skinny. Yeah, it'd be like you or I losing 25 or 30 pounds in one night just to find a mate. Huh. And this is actually a classic conundrum in evolution. You would find it across so many different organisms. Darwin first noticed it in peacocks and it became known as the peacock puzzle. So a peacock's tail, as grand and beautiful as it is...

by the theory of natural selection kind of shouldn't be. It prevents them from being able to really fly well. It gets them like caught up in bushes easily. Peacocks are absurd. Totally, totally. And they really puzzled Darwin. Fashion over function. No, exactly. This is classic fashion over function. Totally. And fashion over function in science is actually just called sexual selection.

There's an official term for it, which is that. Darwin eventually figured out that females prefer peacocks with extravagant tails. And therefore, those peacocks mate a bunch more and they have many more offspring. And that is why that trait survives. Right. So these crickets are kind of like the peacocks, except that instead of having a big colorful tail, they have a very exhausting...

but super sexy song. And Ritchick would eventually discover actually that the sexiest songs are the louder songs. So females like loud, loud songs. Got it. But the genius in this cricket, the thing that made me fall in love with them so much is that some of these little guys give their little cricket middle finger to this beauty standard.

What? How? What do you mean? Okay, so let me tell you. So one night, Ritik is out in the field looking for crickets like he does. Another PhD student was also helping me with sampling. And then... He hears this song. I hear one cricket which...

Sounds louder than usual. Like louder than he's ever heard before. It's so loud that it feels like it's just near my ear, but there is no bush there. It's like the cricket is in his head, but not, obviously. Yeah. So we start searching for that particular cricket. He's moving through this field. I am like trying to overarch through top of a bush. Yeah.

It was really hard to locate it. Yeah, we are completely exhausted. Neither of us can find the cricket. And then suddenly I see that there seems to be a hole in the middle of a leaf. And there is a tiny head which is popping out. A little hole about the size of a penny in this leaf. And inside it, the head of a tiny tree cricket. I was like...

What am I looking at? And then I call my friend. We now are investigating more. Like we are looking from the back. We are trying to look from the side. And what they eventually see is that this cricket is singing from within this leaf. It's calling from the hole of the leaf.

So he's like, that's weird. Yeah, this is something very, very unusual. Because these crickets, they're always on the leaf. They're never actually in the leaf. My supervisor had given her mobile number and had told that only in case of emergencies, you should call.

And I frantically searched for my mobile and I called her immediately. 911. And she told him, you know, I've actually heard about this before. It was written about in some paper a few decades ago. This was a publication which came out in 1975. So what he saw, it wasn't just some fluke. Does it have a name?

They called it... Baffling. And the name that they gave to these crickets was... They called them...

Bafflers. Bafflers. Okay. Why? Why bafflers? So the leaves with the holes are called baffles. And a baffle is a surface that reflects sound, basically. Oh, okay. So the leaf is like taking the vibrations of their song and shooting it out into the field? Yeah, basically. You can think of a megaphone kind of a thing, right? So in other words, if you took that cricket out of the hole, it would be quiet.

And if you put it back in the hole, it would be loud again. The paper also explained that these crickets in the holes, they didn't just like fly.

fall into a hole, they created the holes for themselves. They chewed them with their little cricket mouths and they climbed inside them to amplify their songs. Wow. So they're like fashioning a tool? Exactly. Like a little insect tool? Exactly. Wow. Okay, that is crazy, right? That's pretty cool. Yeah. Okay, but this raises a very real and interesting question for Rittich. Does this work? No.

Like we said before, when it comes to these crickets, females generally prefer louder individuals. Louder is better. Now, sometimes they have to settle for a quiet cricket. Based on how much energy you have spent searching. Like your standards lower. Exactly. Very relatable. Yeah. But if given the choice, it will always go for the louder one.

And it's not even just that a female cricket prefers a louder cricket to a quieter cricket. She'll actually mate with that louder cricket for longer than she would that quiet cricket. And here, Rittik has found a quiet cricket, pretending, using this leaf megaphone thing to disguise itself as a loud one.

And so the question is, do the females actually get deceived? Do they treat this cricket like a loud cricket? Do they stick around and mate with it for longer than they would if it didn't have that baffle? Or can they spot the con? Is she like, I've been punked? Or is she like, let's do it, whatever. It will all boil down to the point whether the female can catch the bluff.

So Rittich didn't experiment to test this out. And what he found was that the female cricket... It spent equal amount of time with a quiet cricket whose call has been amplified by using baffle, with that of a truly loud individual who already calls at that particular loudness. The female crickets mated with the bafflers just as much as the naturally loud crickets. So it was like...

wow, indeed the cheating is working. It's just ingenious. Like this little cricket that by no fault of its own isn't supposed to mate that much has found this incredibly clever way of leveling the playing field, of sort of like playing with the big dogs and like keeping himself in the fight.

But like to me, I don't know. I'm like a little hesitant because like considering it from the female side. Yeah. What the hell? Like this is false advertising. The whole idea of sexual selection, as I understand it, is that the peacock's tail or the loud cricket chirp, like that suggests genetic change.

And the reason that it's lasted for so long in the cricket world is because loud guys are better mates that are going to produce stronger offspring who are more likely to survive. So now what this kind of hack, this is a bait and switch. A lie. Like this is not fair. But this cricket.

Cricket is a genius. Like, I guess that's where I come in is. But is he even, is he an evil genius is the question. No, I know. I've like self-reflected on this a lot and whether or not like I should be ashamed that I am endorsing this type of deception. However, a couple other ways you could think about it. The loudness might just signal this is a good one and I should spend more time mating with it. And

And so whether that is a cricket that is just naturally louder or a cricket that has figured out a way to make its own calls louder, like that is a pretty, that trait, like, I don't know. I feel like that deserves some recognition. I don't know though, Bex. Like it's still a lie. It's still a trick. I just, this is the guy, this is the animal that wooed you over into liking animals? Yes!

It is, okay. And, okay, I guess the other reason that I want to defend this male cricket is, so in the peacocks, peacocks have developed these beautiful tails because females choose and they like big, pretty tails, right? So it's like this whole sex of peacocks has adapted just to be chosen as a mate, used for its body, if you will. Now, my feeling about this male cricket is that

It feels like in a way that what we're seeing is crickets not narrowing in into some like homogenized version of the cricket that is the most likely to get chosen. This cricket's like fighting for itself. It's like I might not measure up to your beauty standards, but I deserve to survive. And so I'm going to find another way of doing that. Producer, animal lover, Becca Bressler.

I wrote a song about the cricket. Oh, sing me the song. Can you guys give me a beat? I guess it's like, they rub their wings so they don't die alone. They use the leaves as a megaphone. They spread their seeds to get the ladies going. They use the leaves as a megaphone. Thank you so much.

Next up, we've got another underdog story for you. But we are leaving the fields of India and heading onto the field in the American South. Hike! We'll be back.

Hey, listeners. This is Becca Bressler. I produced one of the segments for this episode alongside Annie McKeown. First off, thank you. As you know, Radiolab belongs to New York Public Radio, which is to say that we rely on your support. For each episode, we rope in so many people to do so many different things. This episode was no exception.

There were two reporters on this episode, Annie and me, our team of sound designers, and our incredible fact checker, Diane Kelly. We talked to two different guests. We read at least three books, probably like 25, 30 articles. And there were as many as, I don't know, 17 or 18 versions of each story until we made one that worked. And this is just what we do. We dive into each episode as deep as we can. And this takes so much time.

And we do this thanks to you. You help sustain us over time. This is why we created our membership program, The Lab.

We are so very grateful to you. So we also try to make it worth your while. There's so much stuff that we love that we can't include in every episode that you'll get to hear or even events where we get to spend time together. Also, swag. There's like a super cool tie-dye hat that has a goat on top of a cow, which is so strange. Bottom line is that your support makes it possible for us to continue to do the work that we do.

To our lab members, thank you. Thank you for allowing us to go on. And for those of you who aren't members yet, you can join the lab at radiolab.org slash join. See you all there. And thanks for listening.

I'm Maria Konnikova. And I'm Nate Silver. And our new podcast, Risky Business, is a show about making better decisions. We're both journalists who moonlight as poker players, and that's the lens we're going to use to approach this entire show. We're going to be discussing everything from high-stakes poker to personal questions. Like whether I should call a plumber or fix my shower myself. And of course, we'll be talking about the election, too. Listen to Risky Business wherever you get your podcasts.

Latif. Lulu. Radiolab. Next up, we've got another story about some little guys trying to do a big thing. Okay, let's just huddle up, circle up. Yeah, circle up, circle up. What are you here to tell us about? Great question. Okay. From producer Annie McEwen. All right, let's do it.

Okay, so picture a college football field in Atlanta, Georgia. What season? It's fall. It's fall. It's October. Okay. And it's a warm day. It's like 70 degrees plus and it's humid and the fans are cheering from the stands as the players jog out onto the field. Georgia Tech versus Cumberland University. The game is about to begin. A familiar scene in the U.S. today. Yeah. Yeah.

Except这些球员，代替笨重的护具和巨大的闪亮头盔，穿着小皮帽和拉到膝盖的针织袜子。因为这场比赛发生在1916年。哦。好的。观众们即将见证历史。这样的事情再也无法重演。因为这场足球比赛根本不该发生。

这不仅仅是一场足球比赛，因为这太荒谬了。谁会这样做？这里来帮我解释的是坎伯兰大学的历史教授塔拉·米切尔·梅尔尼克博士。我是第九代田纳西州人，所以我们在这里待了很久。

那么这场比赛，你第一次听说是什么时候？我不太确定。我觉得我一直都知道这件事。我想这可能是坎伯兰的一个名声或恶名，我不太确定。好的。那么我们就开始吧。如果你能告诉我发生了什么。好的。1916年...

坎伯兰遇到了一些财务困难。大学需要削减开支，削减成本。已经做出了决定。足球队被解散了。坎伯兰将不再拥有足球队。现在，那个赛季的比赛日程已经安排好了。所以坎伯兰不得不联系所有学校，说，我们很抱歉，但我们没有足球队。我们不会比赛。每所学校都说，没问题。除了一个。乔治亚理工学院。乔治亚理工学院。

他们从乔治亚理工学院收到的回信大致是这样的：你们有合同。这是一个法律合同。如果你们不参加这场比赛，我们将起诉你们3000美元。3000美元在当时相当于今天的8万美元。有些人说这将使学校破产。将关闭学校。为什么乔治亚理工学院如此固执？为什么他们不让他像其他人一样解脱？这个故事的这一部分有点模糊，但根据传说，乔治亚理工学院对坎伯兰感到愤怒。哦。

而且不仅仅是乔治亚理工学院的任何人，特别是他们的主教练，一个名叫约翰·海斯曼的人。海斯曼奖杯的力量，魔力，力量。

你们听说过约翰·海斯曼吗？没有。海斯曼奖杯。在我让你们离开之前，谁是海斯曼奖杯的得主？海斯曼奖杯可以在这个...所以海斯曼奖杯每年颁发给最佳大学足球运动员。它以历史上最著名的大学足球教练之一的名字命名。没有人能否认海斯曼在足球方面的天才。这个家伙发明了后卫，传球给四分卫...

被认为是推广前传球的先驱。没有他，足球就不会是同样的运动。他就是那个人。他看起来有点像一个可怕的神，像高颧骨，强壮的眉头。他的执教风格也有点像神一样。你知道，我们不输，不表现出弱点。他以在每个赛季开始时对球员进行演讲而闻名，他会举起一个足球，直视他们的眼睛说...

宁愿死去也不愿失误这个足球。哇。是的。

那么，海斯曼为什么对坎伯兰如此生气？好吧，传说是这样的，这一切都与一个名叫乔治·艾伦的坎伯兰学生有关。乔治·艾伦显然是校园里的风云人物。他20岁，外表干净，普通的白人小伙子，来自1910年代，热衷于兄弟会派对，大家最喜欢的兄弟。他是棒球和足球队的学生经理。当坎伯兰大学取消他们的足球队时，乔治·艾伦有了这个主意。

传说是，这个主意让约翰·海斯曼非常生气。好的。好的。乔治·艾伦感到学校精神低落。有一天，他想，如果坎伯兰的棒球队在下一场比赛中真的能打出好成绩，

那么也许失去足球项目就不会那么痛苦。他试图向世界展示学校仍然充满运动精神。是的。所以他偷偷雇佣了所有这些小联盟球员，这些职业棒球运动员。所谓的“替补”。那些技术上并不是坎伯兰学生的家伙。穿上坎伯兰大学的制服，在即将到来的棒球比赛中比赛。他们在和谁比赛？他们在和乔治亚理工学院的

棒球队比赛。哦。出于某种原因，这支球队也由约翰·海斯曼执教。哦，不。是的。这场比赛完全是一边倒。这些专业球员在和这些孩子比赛，基本上他们只是感到无聊，打得很轻松。在某个时刻，他们开始轻松打击。太不公平了。他们最终以22比0获胜。坎伯兰的学校精神回来了。但约翰·海斯曼并不高兴。是的。我能理解。

所以当坎伯兰说，嘿，我们不会在亚特兰大进行秋季的那场足球比赛，因为我们取消了足球项目时，海斯曼基本上说，去你的，乔治·艾伦。我们将进行这场比赛。但问题是坎伯兰没有足球队。我们已经取消了我们的足球项目。所以乔治·艾伦站出来说，我们将进行这场比赛。

但没有足球队。那么他该怎么办？基本上，乔治·艾伦开始在校园招募。请求所有这些年轻的法学院学生。他们都是十几岁和二十出头的年轻人。这些你可以在图书馆走廊或外面聚会时看到的苍白身影。他们并不反对聚会。我们就这么说吧。乔治·艾伦说，我们需要你的帮助。学校需要你的帮助。母校在请求你的帮助。人们纷纷响应。大约有16到18名学生。他们以前玩过足球吗？

有些人玩过。一些人曾在高中时是足球运动员。所以他们对这场比赛的样子和如何进行这场比赛有一定的了解。他们并不是完全的新手。因此，他们迅速筹集资金购买火车票和酒店房间。

当大日子到来时，黎巴嫩举行了盛大的送行。每个人都出来为那些自愿拯救学校的男孩加油。他们挥舞着横幅，上面写着诸如“哦，哇”的大标语。然后他们搭乘火车前往亚特兰大。当我们前往亚特兰大时，我将请Radiolab的制作协调员W·哈里·福图纳加入，因为哈里，我认为在我们四人中，只有他对足球有所了解。我来帮忙。好的。

1916年10月7日，乔治亚理工学院的格兰特球场，观众席上有1000名乔治亚理工学院的观众。对于坎伯兰来说，这将是一个庞大的观众。他们可能会对为这场比赛而来的观众人数感到敬畏。这让我想起了《胡希尔斯》中篮球队进入那个巨大的体育馆的场景，他们有点像，哦，我的天。这太大了。

他们没有设备经理。他们必须自己携带设备。他们几乎没有护具。那些旧的皮革头盔，几乎只是你头上的一顶帽子。我甚至不认为有护齿。在场边，乔治·艾伦和其他球员一起穿着装备，发表了几句话。我们只是想让这一切顺利进行。我们必须进行这场比赛并回家。当裁判把硬币抛向空中...

它在阳光下闪烁，翻转着。坎伯兰一方有一种感觉，也许... - 我们可以做到。我们真的可以做到。结果这将成为他们余生都在谈论的事情。- 因为从这场比赛的开始，

事情开始出现偏差。乔治亚理工学院赢得了掷硬币的机会，他们选择开球。他们踢出了球。球飞过空中。是坎伯兰的一名球员，然后转身看到一堵乔治亚理工学院的球员墙朝他冲来，他愣住了。

坎伯兰的四分卫爱德华斯用身体挡住了一个即将到来的乔治亚理工学院球员，立刻被击倒在地。持球的家伙，那个愣住的家伙也被压倒了。坎伯兰无法摆脱自己的领地。他们最终踢出了一个球，但这个球只有20码。不是很多。不是很多。乔治亚理工学院获得了球权，并迅速将球推进到达阵区。乔治亚理工学院的达阵。在第一场比赛中。我只想让你们去访问我发给你们的YouTube文件。哦，太好了。因为这是每次乔治亚理工学院得分时播放的歌曲。好的。等一下，让我播放。真是个了不起的工程师。

乔治亚理工学院踢出额外得分，在不到一分钟的比赛中，比分是乔治亚理工学院7，坎伯兰0。而那第一次达阵只是个开始。乔治亚理工学院开始一次又一次地将球推进过线。

达阵，接着是达阵，接着是达阵，接着是达阵。主场观众们失去了理智。很快，情况变得相当明显。这是...

0 这将是个问题。坎伯兰正在遭受重创。他们被铲倒。用各种身体部位撞击他的脸或头。你的手臂、头、肩膀，只要能把他放倒就行。这就是足球。四分卫爱德华兹重新回到场上，但立刻又被击倒。哦，拜托。他又被抬下场。基本上每次乔治亚理工触球，他们都能跑进达阵区。坎伯兰的球员们心想，这太糟糕了。这是一场荒谬的屠杀足球比赛。

他们终于到了中场休息。现在的比分是多少？中场的比分是126比零。126比零？没错。现在许多球员本该因脑震荡被换下。他们不被允许继续比赛，但这是个不同的时代。在正常比赛中，应该会有一个

弃权。但如果坎伯兰弃权，他们就得支付3000美元。所以他们必须坚持到比赛结束。必须继续。而海斯曼，他没有保留。他也不信任乔治·艾伦。他想，或许他引入了一些外援。乔治·艾伦在他的边线试图鼓励他的队伍。他说，好吧，大家，我们已经走到一半了。坚持下去。

中场休息结束。我们能做到。我们能做到。我们只需要完成。而现在赢的目标已经完全放弃，所有的一切都只是为了耗时间，各种本能开始发挥作用。生存，战斗或逃跑。一些坎伯兰的球员开始逃离技术队的比赛。

甚至有一个坎伯兰的球员说，每次技术队拿到球，我就转身和技术队一起跑。这是他试图保护自己的方式。偶尔，他们似乎有机会，我想，因为有一个故事讲述一个坎伯兰的球员在开阔的场地上奔向达阵线。他在跑。他要成功了。坎伯兰。但不，他摔倒了。他绊倒了一个正在四肢着地找眼镜的队友。啊！

第三节开始。我们的朋友爱德华兹，被击倒了两次。他又回到比赛中。有人把球给了他。他把球传给一个队友，队友又把球传回。两人都不想要这个球。如果你没有橄榄球，你就不会被铲倒。所以他们站在那里来回传球。几乎就像是热土豆橄榄球。直到一个技术队的铲球手过来，把他们两个都撞倒，爱德华兹第三次被抬下场。

时间。哦，爱德华兹。我们有皮维，一个法学院的学生，他被告知不需要碰球。他被扔了球。

他慌了。他把球扔掉，跑到一个栅栏后面，那里已经有两个其他的坎伯兰球员在躲藏。不！是的，他们不想让他暴露他们的藏身之处，所以把他扔回栅栏那边。有一个故事是海斯曼看着他的替补席，他说，我不认识那个家伙。他走过去问，难道你不是坎伯兰的球员吗？那个人说，别告诉他们。坎伯兰的球员，他的名字叫约翰尼·狗·尼尔森。他被一只狗追着，是真正的狗。哦！

所以我们现在完全像是《乐一通》卡通。绝对如此。好吧，我们快到结尾了，这是一个惊人的时刻，因为坎伯兰就像，草地上有血。鼻子骨折。可怜的爱德华兹第三次被击倒。这些人被摧毁了。他们已经没有什么可以失去了。现在的比分是多少？比分是173比0。哇。好吧。这些家伙没有希望。但出于某种原因...

他们在心中找到团结的力量。所以坎伯兰，他们在一个小圈里讨论他们的下一步。那一定是开球或者他们在阻挡额外得分。阻挡一个任意球？是的。有人提议这个爬梯子战术，现在是非法的。哦，天哪。一些坎伯兰的球员说，不，这太自杀了。我们不应该这样做。但这个年轻人，鱼木...

他是金发，笑容很好。他自愿说，我来做。你可以想象，观众现在一定在疯狂，因为看到一个团队在如此低谷时团结起来。我知道。我喜欢这个。我喜欢。这太棒了。

所以一个球员四肢着地，抓住第二个球员的膝盖，第二个球员弯腰抓住第三个球员的肚子。什么？当乔治亚理工的踢球手踢球时，第四个球员，鱼木，他冲向他们，爬上他们的背部，尽可能高地跳起来。什么？他在空中飞翔，手臂伸出，试图抓住球。但他的手指只是擦过一切。

而不是用手挡住球，维奇用脸挡住了。摔断了鼻子。可能有脑震荡。等等，但...他确实挡住了。所以如果不是因为维奇·伍兹，得分会更高。是的，他用脸挡住了。哎呀。

比赛很快结束，最终比分是222比零。哇。技术队总共得了32个达阵。那是当时最高的得分吗？是的。实际上今天仍然是最高的。这在《吉尼斯世界纪录》中。是最高得分的比赛。我只是试图想象比赛结束时的情景，就像比赛的最后哨声。

在最后一分钟。躺下，试图喘口气，判断一下，知道有没有什么地方受伤。只是疲惫和沮丧。这些家伙真的是彻底的失败者。

但他们坚持到了最后，拯救了他们的学校免于潜在的财务破产。他们去吃牛排晚餐了吗？显然他们去了。他们出去聚会了吗？显然他们在亚特兰大那晚出去聚会，眼睛肿得几乎看不见任何东西。但显然他们去了。连爱德华兹也去吗？我不知道爱德华兹。是的。我仍然想要一个维奇·伍兹的纹身。我无法不喜欢这个。维奇·伍兹！

制作人，足球评论员，安妮·麦基伦。好吧，在我们结束之前，我想告诉你一个刚刚发布的新系列，来自我们在《死亡、性与金钱》上的同事。它叫《硬》。它是关于...

它是关于勃起功能障碍的。我很好奇你会怎么说这个。是的。作为一个嫁给女人的女人，我不确定里面是否会有很多内容适合我。但在安娜·塞尔斯主持下，结果发现确实有。我是说，有一些坦诚的对话，关于亲密关系可以是什么样的。

而且有一个非常疯狂的伟哥发明历史，以及药物如何工作的完全令人震惊的生理学。我对此一无所知。这是一个最终充满快乐的系列。到最后，它真的...

超越了所谓的勃起功能障碍甚至是功能障碍的概念，并且有这些非常广泛的时刻，人们谈论亲密关系的新愿景。就像这样。感觉就像，我之前解释过的，感觉就像我的血管里有阳光。就像我体内的一切都变成红色

白色和愉悦。我的整个身体似乎消失在这种愉悦的状态中。感觉就像我被注入了快乐。再次强调，它叫《硬》，来自《死亡、性与金钱》。希望你能听听。♪

《电台实验室》由贾德·阿布姆拉德创作，索伦·惠勒编辑。露露·米勒和拉提夫·纳赛尔是我们的联合主持人。苏茜·莱赫滕贝格是我们的执行制片人。迪伦·基夫是我们的声音设计总监。我们的工作人员包括西蒙·阿德勒，杰里米·布鲁姆，贝卡·布雷斯勒，以及

瑞秋·库西克，W·哈里·福图纳，大卫·盖布尔，玛丽亚·帕兹·古铁雷斯，辛德胡·耶尼桑宾丹，马特·基尔提，安妮·麦基恩，亚历克斯·尼森，萨拉·卡里，安娜·罗斯克维特-帕兹，阿里安·瓦克，帕特·沃尔特斯，和莫莉·韦伯斯特。感谢卡罗琳·麦克斯克和莎拉·索恩巴赫的帮助。我们的事实检查员是黛安·凯利，艾米莉·克里格，和亚当·希比尔。

嗨，我是苏珊娜，来自华盛顿特区。对《电台实验室》科学节目提供领导支持的是戈登和贝蒂·摩尔基金会，科学沙盒，一个西蒙斯基金会的倡议，以及约翰·坦普尔顿基金会。对《电台实验室》的基础支持由阿尔弗雷德·P·斯隆基金会提供。