We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Selects: How the Stanford Prison Experiment Worked

Selects: How the Stanford Prison Experiment Worked

2024/11/23
logo of podcast Stuff You Should Know

Stuff You Should Know

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
Topics
Josh Clark 和 Chuck Bryant:斯坦福监狱实验的执行存在严重缺陷,其结果存在多种解读,实验设计者更像是一个表演者,而非科学家。实验结果没有发表在同行评审的期刊上,这本身就是一个警示信号。实验中扮演“坏警卫”的参与者Dave Eshelman声称自己只是在扮演角色,并非出于恶意。实验的结论——人们天生邪恶或容易在逆境中崩溃——是错误的,因为实验参与者的行为并非自然发生,而是被引导的结果。Zimbardo作为实验参与者,他的行为影响了实验结果。实验者对警卫进行了指导,这使得实验结果失去了客观性。对警卫的指导消除了其行为的自然性,并使他们成为了实验的共同参与者,从而破坏了实验的客观性。实验缺乏对照组,这严重影响了实验结果的可靠性。Zimbardo试图阻止BBC监狱研究的发表,这体现了他的不端行为。实验招募广告中使用了“监狱实验”字样,这导致参与者存在偏见。 Philip Zimbardo:实验旨在揭示监狱环境的残酷性以及其对人性的影响,而非进行纯粹的科学研究。 Dave Eshelman:自己只是在扮演角色,并非出于恶意。 Douglas Corpy:承认自己是在装病以逃离实验。 Christine Maslach:对实验中出现的残酷行为感到震惊,并促使实验提前结束。 Jaffe:作为实验的共同设计者,对实验结果负有责任。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why did the Stanford Prison Experiment attract participants who were biased against prisons?

The experiment advertised itself as a 'prison experiment,' which attracted individuals already inclined towards prison reform or against the prison system.

Why did the Stanford Prison Experiment fail to include a control group?

Zimbardo did not set up a control group, which is crucial for scientific comparison, likely because he was more focused on proving the inherent brutality of prisons.

Why did the guards in the Stanford Prison Experiment become cruel so quickly?

The guards were coached by researchers to be more brutal, turning them into co-experimenters rather than passive participants, which influenced their behavior.

Why did Douglas Corpy fake a nervous breakdown during the Stanford Prison Experiment?

Corpy faked the breakdown to escape the experiment, which he found unpleasant and not what he expected when he signed up.

Why did Zimbardo's girlfriend, Christine Maslach, intervene in the Stanford Prison Experiment?

Maslach was outraged by the cruel treatment of the prisoners and the chaotic conditions, leading her to insist that Zimbardo stop the experiment.

Why did Zimbardo's findings about inherent human cruelty gain widespread acceptance?

The findings resonated with the public's concerns about the Vietnam War, the Maile Massacre, and the Attica prison riot, tying into broader societal debates about authority and brutality.

Why did Zimbardo attempt to discredit the BBC Prison Study?

Zimbardo reportedly tried to prevent the BBC Prison Study from being published because it contradicted his findings and showed less brutality among guards and prisoners when not coached.

Why did Zimbardo involve himself in the Stanford Prison Experiment?

Zimbardo acted as the superintendent, likely to ensure the experiment reflected his views on the inherent brutality of prisons, but this compromised the objectivity of the study.

Why did the Stanford Prison Experiment conclude after only six days?

The experiment was halted after six days due to the extreme psychological distress of the participants and the intervention of Zimbardo's girlfriend, Christine Maslach.

Why did the Stanford Prison Experiment become a notorious example of ethical malfeasance?

The experiment is criticized for its lack of scientific rigor, ethical violations, and the manipulation of participants, making it a cautionary tale in research ethics.

Chapters
Josh and Chuck discuss the Stanford Prison Experiment, questioning its validity and execution.
  • The Stanford Prison Experiment is often criticized for its poor execution.
  • Zimbardo's involvement as the superintendent tainted the experiment.
  • The experiment's findings are widely open to interpretation.

Shownotes Transcript

The infamous Stanford Prison Experiment wasn't really much of an experiment as it turns out. It was more like a poorly thought out exercise conducted by a professor who didn't dot the i's and cross the t's. Listen in to this classic episode as Josh and Chuck give this experiment some harsh treatment of their own.

See omnystudio.com/listener) for privacy information.