All eyes back on Gaza
27:46 Share

Things in Gaza have been bad for, like, forever. But they're getting so bad that the coalition of people talking about it has got to be the most far-reaching it's ever been. From the podcaster Theo Vaughn... That I think we're watching. Probably, like, you know, one of the sickest things that's ever happened. To the children's entertainer Miss Rachel... It's sad that people...

Try to make it controversial when you speak out for children that are facing immeasurable suffering. To the new Pope, Pope Bob. To a former Israeli prime minister. A couple of million people living in Gaza and they say they should all starve and be demolished. This is a call for war crime. To even President Trump. We're going to help the people of Gaza get some food.

We're going to ask if it'll make a difference on Today Explained. At New Balance, we believe if you run, you're a runner, however you choose to do it. Because when you're not worried about doing things the right way, you're free to discover your way. And that's what running's all about. Run your way at newbalance.com slash running.

Memorial Day savings are here at The Home Depot. So take your kitchen to the next level with up to 35% off, plus up to an extra $450 off select appliances like LG. Plan your get-togethers with an LG refrigerator you can count on for years to come at The Home Depot. And with the connected ThinQ app, you'll know if the door is left open and when to change the filter. Spend less time worrying this Memorial Day with savings on LG, America's most reliable appliance brand at The Home Depot.

Offer valid May 15th through June 4th. U.S. only. See store or online for details. You are listening to Today Explained. Tia Goldenberg is a correspondent for the Associated Press in Jerusalem. We asked her what's going on with aid in Gaza.

Israel and the U.S. are trying to get a new aid system off the ground. Throughout the war, you've had traditional aid groups like the U.N. and other charities providing aid to Gazans where they are in the Gaza Strip. And Israel, for the entirety of the war, has accused Hamas of siphoning off that aid and using it to bolster its rule in Gaza. Hamas steals the supplies and prevents the people of Gaza from getting them.

It uses these supplies to finance its terror machine, which is aimed directly at Israel and our civilians. And this we cannot accept. Aid groups say there's been no significant diversion.

But Israel's been looking for a way to get aid away from the UN and aid groups. It also obviously has lots of years-long skepticism and tensions between Israel and the UN. So what we've seen over the past couple of days is this new aid mechanism get off the ground. The linchpin of this aid mechanism is a group called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.

The so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is backed by the US and Israel and uses American contractors for security. The shadowy organization faces accusations of helping Israel fulfill its military objectives, of excluding Palestinians, and of failing to adhere to humanitarian principles.

The American company running this new scheme says that 8,000 boxes of food have been handed out so far. But remember, the population of Gaza is 2.2 million. Now, what we've also seen over the past couple of days is the chaos that surrounds this attempt to kind of arrest aid from the traditional aid groups delivering it.

There's video circulating online now and it shows the moment that thousands of Palestinians flooded this distribution center in Rafah. There was no order. The people rushed to take something. We didn't get anything. There was shooting and we fled.

Now this came hours after the organization's executive director said that he was resigning even before the foundation began working. Jake Woods' resignation comes just two months after he was asked to leave the organization. In a statement issued by the foundation, Wood made his reasoning clear. It is clear that it's not possible to implement this plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence.

which I will not abandon. The effort itself is really controversial because the UN and aid groups say they're not going to work with the GHF. They think that if they do, it'll violate their core humanitarian principles because Palestinians have to essentially be displaced. They have to move to reach these aid centers. And they don't want to be part of that. They see that aid is being politicized or even weaponized.

The project has been controversial, seen by critics as politicising and militarising aid and using food distribution to cattle Palestinians into diminishingly smaller areas with selective distribution used to starve out Israel's adversaries. We need all types of aid, not aid that is cherry-picked by the Israeli side that we are allowed to get in.

And what we've seen over the past few months since March 2nd is Israel blocking aid from entering Gaza entirely. That ended about a week ago when Israel

it would let in a limited amount of aid. And so during these few weeks, or nearly three months actually, no aid was being let into Gaza, no food, no medicine, no fuel. And you had a situation where food experts were warning that nearly one million Palestinians barely had enough access to food, and nearly half a million Palestinians

were at the risk of possible starvation. I saw people running there. I decided to go too. People said it was scary. I didn't care. It was dangerous or not. I was going to go. I want to feed my children.

Just trying to get rice is a struggle for this 18-year-old. Everyone's pushing, she says. There's no flour. This is the beginning of a famine. So the situation is incredibly dire, and it remains so, even though Israel has begun letting a limited amount of aid into Gaza. You're calling it a limited amount of aid. So it's by design not enough aid?

I mean, I can't tell you what the designs of the Israeli government are. Israel is accused of aid groups and world courts of using starvation as a weapon of war.

But Israel says that it has legitimate concerns that this aid is being used to fuel Hamas's rule in Gaza. At the end of the day, Palestinians on the ground are the ones that are suffering and suffering dramatically. How are these policies around aid going over with Israelis in Israel? October 7th.

Hamas's attacks were a huge, huge shock for Israelis, and they're still traumatized.

This also falls in the context of an ongoing war where there are still 58 hostages, about a third of them believed to be alive, being held in Gaza. And so Israelis believe that soldiers are not just fighting in Gaza, they're fighting to free these hostages. So throughout the war, it's important to note that Israeli media has also limited the type of coverage that it has shown to Israelis. Wow.

Some of the harshest images that you see in international media just don't find a place in Israeli media. They tend to promote the Israeli narrative that Hamas is solely to blame for what's happening to civilians in Gaza.

And so there hasn't been too much of a discussion about the humanitarian crisis in the public discourse. That said, there has been somewhat of a shift in recent days or weeks. We're seeing there's a protest movement, an anti-war protest movement that has a very small but growing contingent of protesters who hold up pictures of Palestinian children who have been killed throughout the war.

A leading

opposition politician the other day made some of the harshest comments against Israel's conduct and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. You have an Israeli former general, Yair Golan, saying a sane country does not attack civilians, does not kill babies as a hobby, and does not expel civilian populations. Which sparked an uproar and there was lots of condemnations across the political spectrum, but it also sparked a discussion about

Israel's conduct and what it is doing and the toll of the war on civilians. So, I mean, it's not a wave yet of discussion, but there is kind of sparks looking into or just beginning to discuss the humanitarian situation in Gaza among Israelis. In the meantime, is any of this getting Israel closer to getting back these 58 hostages, one third of whom Israel?

are believed to still be alive? Israel and Hamas were engaged in a ceasefire earlier this year, which Israel ended up shattering about eight weeks in. And, you know, the ceasefire led to hostages being freed. It led to a lull in fighting. And then after Israel resumed fighting, it decided it was going to ramp up the pressure on Hamas. You know, part of that tactic was

to block the aid going into Gaza. And it also said it would ratchet up its offensive on the territory with the aim of defeating Hamas and freeing the hostages. That's been its war aims throughout. So in the past couple of weeks, since this new offensive began, there's been an intensification of strikes. Israel says that as part of this plan, it wants to seize all of Gaza.

Our forces are capturing more and more territory, eliminating and clearing out Hamas terrorists. All of the Gaza Strip will be under the security control of Israel. It wants to hold on to territory. It wants to move the population of Gaza to the south. Ultimately, we intend to have large safe zones in the south of Gaza.

And the Palestinian population will move there for their own safety while we conduct combat in other zones. And that aid plan we discussed earlier is part of this, of moving the population south. So, I mean, it's trying all these new tactics to try to reach its war aims. So far, it's still unclear how different this intensification of its offensive

how it'll manage to do anything different than the last nearly 20 months of fighting did. You know, this war has been going on for so long, and Israel still has not reached its aim of dismantling Hamas and freeing the hostages. And in fact, an overwhelming amount of hostages who have been freed...

have been freed through ceasefire deals and not through military pressure that Israel is now ramping up. So why ramp up military pressure instead of negotiating? Is that desperation? Israel and Hamas stand very far apart on how they see the end of this war playing out. Hamas says it's prepared to free all the hostages immediately for a complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and an end to the war.

Israel obviously wants its hostages freed, but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he's not prepared to end the war unless Hamas is dismantled. This war can end tomorrow.

It can end if Hamas lays down its arms and returns our hostages. And so this has been a key sticking point throughout the war. And neither side is relenting, you know, no matter how much military pressure Israel puts on Hamas. You know, it's killed its leaders. It's devastated the territory. It's just been an intense, intense conflict. And yet that hasn't dislodged Hamas from its position.

Netanyahu, meanwhile, is under a lot of political pressure from his governing coalition to continue the war. It's hard to see how the sides reconcile and come to an agreement that ends this war. Tia Goldenberg, Associated Press, APNews.com. Trump ices out Netanyahu when we're back on Today Explained.

Support for this show comes from StoryWorth. StoryWorth for Father's Day. Father's Day is a great time to dig into your family's stories, and StoryWorth can help you capture those stories. Each week, StoryWorth emails your loved ones a memory-provoking question that you help pick.

All your loved ones need to do is respond to that email with a story. They can either write a story or record it over the phone for StoryWorth to transcribe. At the end of the year, StoryWorth compiles your loved one's stories and photos into a beautiful keepsake hardcover book that you'll be able to share and revisit for generations to come. Colleague Claire White has tried StoryWorth. Here's what she had to say. My dad's an incredible storyteller and he has been my whole life. And so getting this down on paper...

just feels so special to me. And I know it will feel really special to him. You know, having these will be amazing to hold on to for years and years to come. And so I'm excited to continue to fill this book with his stories. Give the dads in your life a unique heartfelt gift you'll all cherish for years. StoryWorth. Right now, save $10 during their Father's Day sale when you go to storyworth.com slash explained at storyworth.com slash explained to save $10 on your order. Support for the show comes from Mercury.

What if banking did more? Because to you, it's more than an invoice. It's your hard work becoming revenue. It's more than a wire. It's payroll for your team. It's more than a deposit. It's landing your fundraise. The truth is, banking can do more.

Mercury brings all the ways you use money into a single product that feels extraordinary to use. Visit mercury.com to join over 200,000 entrepreneurs who use Mercury to do more for their business. Mercury. Banking that does more.

Hi, this is Joe from Vanta. In today's digital world, compliance regulations are changing constantly, and earning customer trust has never mattered more. Vanta helps companies get compliant fast and stay secure with the most advanced AI, automation, and continuous monitoring out there. So whether you're a startup going for your first SOC 2 or ISO 27001, or a growing enterprise managing vendor RIST, Vanta makes it quick, easy, and scalable. And I'm not just saying that because I work here. Get started at Vanta.com.

Today Explained is back. I'm Sean Ramos from here with Josh Keating, who covers national security and foreign policy here at Vox. Josh, Gaza was one of the things that Donald Trump wanted to solve as soon as he entered office. How is he talking about Gaza now? Well, you know, in some ways, to give him credit, you know,

He didn't solve it, but there was a ceasefire in place when he took office. This deal was developed and negotiated under my administration, but its terms will be implemented for the most part by the next administration.

— So incoming Trump's team's cooperation with the outgoing Biden's team helped secure a ceasefire in January, which lasts until March. — The war in Gaza reignited. Israel's military says it is targeting Hamas with new airstrikes in the Gaza Strip. Hamas says it means the ceasefire is over. — Various proposals by U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff had been rejected by Hamas.

You know, now reportedly he's very upset by the images coming out of Gaza, the sort of pictures of malnourished children he's seeing. And, you know, he's made several statements to the effect that he wants to see this war wrapped up quickly. On Gaza, we want to see if we can stop that. And Israel, we've been talking to them and we want to see if we can stop that whole situation as quickly as possible. We're almost oddly back kind of where we were before.

under the Biden administration, where we have all these stories coming out

every few days where either Trump or senior officials speaking on background are quoted saying how frustrated they are with the Netanyahu government, how they're losing patience. We got to get that taken care of. A lot of people are starving. A lot of people are... There's a lot of bad things going on. But the war doesn't seem to be ending. It's continuing. And it's not really clear just how much pressure the Trump administration is willing to bring to bear to get a ceasefire in place.

I guess it wasn't surprising to most people that he couldn't figure this out instantly, considering, I don't know, the history here. But maybe more surprising is that his relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has cooled down so much. What exactly happened there?

Yeah, I mean, you could basically define the Trump administration's Mideast policy in his first term as give Netanyahu what he wants. I speak to you today as a lifelong supporter and true friend of Israel.

Some of the dramatic moves included moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the disputed Golan Heights, and what may have been the kind of crowning achievement of the Trump administration's first-term foreign policy, the Abraham Accords, which are this series of deals under which several Arab countries established formal diplomatic relations with Israel for the first time. I took a risk in doing them and

They've been an absolute bonanza for the countries that have joined. So I think the Israelis, when Trump came in, had every reason to assume that, you know, they had their guy in the White House again, you know, after, you know, some of the frustrations they had with the Biden administration. But putting Gaza to the side for a second, what's been really striking to me is the degree to which

The Trump administration is just kind of pursuing its priorities in the Middle East with

without seemingly any concern over appearing to be aligned with Israel. It's hard to imagine any of the last few administrations doing things like having direct negotiations with Hamas to secure the release of an Israeli-American hostage. Now, we understand that this was the result of direct four-way talks, which led to the release, again, with countries like the U.S., Qatar, Egypt,

and Hamas. We know that the president during his trip throughout the Middle East will not meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Some say it is viewed as somewhat as a slight. They've also restarted nuclear talks with Iran, perhaps willing to countenance a deal that would leave Iran with some kind of nuclear enrichment.

which is a deal basically comparable to the one negotiated by Barack Obama that Trump tore up a decade ago, and which the Israelis famously hated that deal, wanted it torn up. And then a third example is

Yes, the U.S. launched this bombing campaign against the Houthis, the rebels in Yemen who've been attacking shipping in the Red Sea. But when they agreed to stop that bombing a week ago, the deal that they reached with the Houthis basically stipulated that this group wouldn't attack American ships anymore. It said nothing about continuing attacks on Israel. And actually, the Houthis have continued lobbing missiles at Israel. And so

You know, the implicit message of that is that they basically left Israel on its own to deal with the Houthis. So this is stuff that's just kind of remarkable to see from an administration, from a president who's basically touted himself as the most pro-Israel U.S. president in history.

What about the rest of the world? How are they responding to the situation in Gaza right now? Well, I mean, we're seeing European allies who were long reluctant to criticize Israel kind of

Making their positions a lot more clear. I mean, there was a joint statement from the leaders of France, Canada and the UK. We will not stand by while the Netanyahu government pursues these egregious actions. If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response. We oppose any attempt to extremism.

to expand settlements in the West Bank. Even Germany, the government that has perhaps been, other than the US, been the staunchest supporter of Israel within the West, within NATO, has said that it no longer finds Israel's actions acceptable. What the Israeli army is now doing in the Gaza Strip

I no longer understand, frankly, what its objective is. To cause such suffering to the civilian population, as has increasingly been the case in recent days, can no longer be justified as a fight against Hamas terrorism. Is it making any difference? This may also have been one factor among many that led to the resumption of humanitarian aid. But

It's a lot easier for him to brush off

the pressure from these European governments who are sort of viewed as sort of implicitly anti-Israel anyway, than it would be for him to brush it off coming from Trump, who's supposedly Netanyahu's guy. He's, you know, this is supposed to be the most pro-Israel government ever. So if they're losing Trump's backing, I think that's in a lot of ways more meaningful. Okay, so you're saying that if Trump did the thing that Biden did actually do briefly...

and suspended military aid to Israel in some fashion, it could actually turn the tide here. Trump wants to figure out a deal here, he says, at least. He's turned his back on Netanyahu a little, at least. Why not go the extra step? I think cutting off support for Israel would be, you know, a much more dramatic step that I have a hard time accepting.

this president take. I mean, you know, it's important to remember, too, that there's almost this split screen going on with how Trump approaches this issue. When it comes to domestic policy, I think he's sort of like followed through on this most pro-Israel president ever title. You know, the president has made his

effectively tried to criminalize criticism of Israel in many respects. He's deported U.S. residents who've been involved in anti-Israel protests. He's punished universities. You know, it's funny. In some ways, Israel's almost been a domestic issue for this administration rather than a foreign policy one. But I think...

maintaining that split screen is going to be harder if you get to, you know, actually taking steps to sort of punish or restrict aid to Israel on the international stage. That puts the president in a very tricky situation here. If he is genuinely concerned about these images of starving children, where does that path lead him? I could see it leading to effective

sort of public disengagement. I mean, we're seeing a sort of similar dynamic play out in the Russia-Ukraine situation where they're just kind of getting frustrated progress is not being made and they might just sort of wash their hands of the negotiating process, you know, and continue sending weapons to Israel and say it's not really our problem anymore.

Josh.KeatingVox.com, Avishai Artsy and Denise Guerra produced the program today. Jolie Myers edited. Laura Bullard is our senior researcher on facts. And Andrea Christen's daughter was our sole audio engineer for this episode of Today Explained.