Vatever you vant, Vladimir
28:14 Share

All right. It's officially been a month now. And to his credit, President Trump waited almost an entire month before doing a 180 on U.S.-Russia relations.

Trump had a nice long phone call with Vladimir Putin about a week ago. Ukraine was not invited. My call was perfect. And then on Tuesday, Trump blamed Ukraine for being invaded by Russia. And then to top it off, on Truth Social yesterday, he called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky a dictator without elections. Shortly thereafter, on that same website, Trump called himself a king.

Totally cool, normal stuff. But you might be old enough to remember the United States being on Ukraine's side of this war. On Today Explained, we're getting used to this new normal, being BFFs with Russia. And we're going to start with the person Trump has put in charge of U.S. intelligence, a Russia sympathizer with no intelligence experience to speak of, named Tulsi Gabbard.

Whatever you look for in a getaway, you can find it at Virginia Beach. When you're there, you'll be able to enjoy some of the best cultural attractions, activities, and culinary experiences the world has to offer. You could take a stroll on the world's longest pleasure beach that travels for miles and miles. Or you could take part in their annual festivals, concerts, and waterfront dining. And if you're in the mood for dinner, make sure to check out their fresh local seafood with farm-to-table ingredients.

It's a trip that everyone in the family will remember for a lifetime. Go to visitvirginiabeach.com to learn more.

Okay, business leaders, are you here to play or are you playing to win? If you're in it to win, meet your next MVP. NetSuite by Oracle. NetSuite is your full business management system in one convenient suite. With NetSuite, you're running your accounting, your finance, your HR, your e-commerce, and more, all from your online dashboard. Upgrade your playbook and make the switch to NetSuite, the number one cloud ERP. Get the CFO's Guide to AI and Machine Learning at netsuite.com slash vox.

netsuite.com slash vox. This is Today Explained. Vladimir Putin got his start as a spy, and now our top spy in the United States has a soft spot for Vladimir Putin. In fact, some people sincerely believe she's a straight-up Russian operative. That is a charge that's been leveled against her.

She's a favorite of the Russians. She once sued Hillary Clinton for $50 million for saying something along those lines. I will not stand quietly by as Hillary Clinton or anyone else tries to smear my character. I think that goes too far, but she has expressed sympathy for Hillary.

Putin's dilemma. You hear President Biden say, well, this is Putin's war. This is Putin's fault. It's Putin who's the one who's solely responsible. Well, the United States and some of these European NATO countries...

are fueling this war. And for dictators like Bashar al-Assad, the former dictator of Syria. Do you think Assad is our enemy? Assad is not the enemy of the United States because Syria does not pose a direct threat to the United States. She has called for a pardon for Edward Snowden, the whistleblower who exposed illegal surveillance of Americans. You've celebrated Snowden, that's a quote.

Brave whistleblower. So she sounds more like a progressive politician sometimes than a establishment spy chief. And I think she would say that's kind of the point. We need a different perspective on top of the American intelligence system. Steve Kahl is a senior editor at what I'm told is a leading magazine, The Economist. And he's here to help you understand who's just been put in charge of U.S. intelligence and how that might shift the course of

of U.S. foreign policy. Well, she grew up in Hawaii in somewhat unusual circumstances. Her parents were members of a religious community called the Science of Identity Foundation, which was derived from the Hare Krishna branch

of sort of meditation and yoga teaching. And the community that her parents belonged to and that she had considerable exposure to as a child was led by a charismatic guru named Chris Butler, who was a former surfer and college dropout who had lived on the streets as a Hare Krishna follower, but then started his own community. So

One of Chris Butler's most adamant views, at least in the 80s and 90s, was an opposition to homosexuality, which he regarded as an abomination, but also to the establishment of rights for gay and lesbian couples. And as a teenager, Tulsi Gabbard found herself on the streets of Honolulu protesting alongside her parents against the establishment of gay marriage rights in Hawaii.

Don't open the door to weird marriages. Don't let homosexuals force their values on the people of Hawaii. Vote yes on the marriage amendment. And it was in that time when she was very young, I think just 20 or 21 years old, that she and her father simultaneously ran for public office in Hawaii. She was elected to the state legislature and her father was elected as a city councilman initially. So she was in politics.

But she decided after 9-11 that she wanted to join the military. I enlisted in the army because of the horrific terrorist attack on September 11th and volunteered to deploy to Iraq in 2005 where I served in a medical unit. And she has described this experience of war as transformational in her outlook on war.

the American government, on American power. I mean, it was something every day that we all experienced firsthand, the terribly high human cost of war. We have to honor our servicemen and women by only sending them on missions that are worthy of their sacrifice. She did eventually come back to politics after establishing her military career as a part-time reservist.

And she found an opening first on the Honolulu City Council and then in 2012, a seat in Congress, one of the four that Hawaii has opened up. I'm Tulsi Gabbard. I approve this message. I'll work to end tax loopholes, end the war in Afghanistan now, protect Medicare and Social Security. She arrived in Washington and said,

Nancy Pelosi took her under her wing. She was seen as maybe the next Obama, another Hawaiian politician, a woman of color, military career, what's not to like, good speaker, telegenic. Come on, man. And then very quickly, as these things go in Washington, it kind of started to come apart.

Partly, she didn't play the game, and she started to pick fights with the

leaders of her party, including Barack Obama, who she called out for not being sufficiently tough on Islamic terrorism. Our administration refuses to recognize who our enemy is. And unless and until that happens, then it's impossible to come up with a strategy to defeat that enemy. We have to recognize that this is about radical Islam. This is a... So, by the time the 2016 presidential cycle arrived,

She was starting to drift away from the party that had embraced her. What you can see by 2016 is the beginnings of what some people have called the horseshoe shape of American political populism, where the farther you go to the left, the closer you get to the MAGA right.

By 2019, she's still a Democrat and she can be critical of Donald Trump in public. What is happening right now is a very clear consequence of having a commander in chief who doesn't know what he's doing. She was already part of the MAGA conversation. She knew Tucker Carlson went on his show on Fox News and she won praise from some ardent Republicans.

Trump supporters in the manosphere and podcasting landscape and so forth. And so she, in 2022, she left the party to become an independent. I can no longer remain in today's Democratic Party. It's now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness. And...

In 2024, she campaigned with Donald Trump and then she endorsed him. I invite you to join me in doing all that we can to save our country and elect President Donald J. Trump and send him back to the White House. And then finally, toward the end of the campaign, she announced that she was becoming a Republican. I'm proud to stand here with you today, President Trump, and announce that I'm joining the Republican Party.

Good for her. How does she go from becoming a Republican to becoming one of the most important players in our intelligence community? If not the most important player.

Well, you know, it really is a puzzle because Donald Trump could have nominated her to be secretary of veterans affairs or something. And everyone would have said, oh, what a what an innovative choice. And she would have gotten confirmed with with no difficulty. Instead, he named her the top spy of the U.S. system. Now, she has no experience of these bureaucracies.

She has not been an intelligence analyst or a synthesizer of complicated information. Indeed, a lot of her takes over the years on the foreign policy questions that she was most interested in were a bit garbled or a bit puzzling in different ways. She sometimes aligned herself with misinformation and propaganda that was coming out of Russia or Syria's dictatorship.

She seemed kind of an uncritical thinker. She clearly had strong policy views, but she would select facts

as if she was just cruising the internet and making her arguments out of what she found. And so it left me initially, as I was working on her biography, kind of puzzled, like, why this job? But the answer reveals itself in her own speaking and writing and her own convictions. And she brought some of this even to her confirmation hearing. Chuck Schumer admitted a few years ago, quote, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you. And...

So this is, in fact, why Donald Trump, I think, is attracted to her leadership and why she's aligned with Donald Trump's agenda in the intelligence community, which is that her first job includes carrying out two executive orders that the president signed fairly early on that basically designate the director of national intelligence as

for a period of a couple or three months to conduct a review of people who are disloyal and to take disciplinary action against them, people who had quote-unquote weaponized intelligence in the previous administration or who were otherwise unreliable politically. And so she's going to lead that review.

And what you can say is that she's motivated to do it. She thinks there is a really deep-seated problem in the intelligence communities that she will now have the power to do something about. So those are her first tasks from her boss. But obviously a big part of her job will be countering intelligence.

U.S. adversaries, China comes to mind. Russia historically would have come to mind. But what does putting Tulsi Gabbard in charge of our national intelligence say about where we're heading with Russia and about what Trump wants to accomplish with Russia?

Well, she never appeared to regard Vladimir Putin as an enemy of the United States. She tended to express herself indirectly about this by criticizing the democratic elites for demonizing Putin. And she would mock them for calling him the new Hitler. And she blamed NATO for provoking Putin. So in that sense, she...

was aligned with President Trump's assessments of Putin as someone he could do business with, as someone he should try to do business with. You know, perhaps there are people around President Trump who see grand strategy in this. They might say that U.S. policy has driven Russia and China closely together, complicating America's great power position, and that

the U.S. has to pull one of those two away and Russia is the better choice. That seems to be the hypothesis that has brought hawks and non-interventionists together in this early period of the Trump administration. But for Tulsi Gabbard, I don't hear anything

on the chessboard like that. I think she just has an instinct that the elites have gotten it all wrong and that Vladimir Putin has been unfairly maligned. Steve Call, Economist.com, whatever you want, Vladimir, ahead on Today Explained. Today Explained

Explore new frontiers at South by Southwest, the premier destination for creatives from around the globe. Network with industry professionals, attend inspirational conference sessions, check out the latest tech innovations, and explore so much more at the 2025 South by Southwest Conference and Festivals.

This March 7th to 15th in Austin, Texas. The greatest discoveries happen when bold people and ideas come together at South by Southwest. Save 10% off platinum badges with code Vox10 at SXSW.com.

Get the Angel Reef Special at McDonald's now. Let's break it down. My favorite barbecue sauce, American cheese, crispy bacon, pickles, onions, and a sesame seed bun, of course. And don't forget the fries and a drink. Sound good? Ba-da-ba-ba-ba. And participating restaurants for a limited time.

When you check out at the pharmacy, you see the journey from idea to medicine, thanks to our intellectual property system, or IP for short. IP safeguards inventions, like a new way to prevent seizures or lower cholesterol. And IP supports competition from other brands. Then, lower-cost generics, which are 90% of prescriptions filled in the U.S. Innovation. Competition. Lower costs.

Thanks to IP. Learn more at phrma.org slash IPWorksWonders.

I still haven't understood how can someone so beautiful be an Iraq war veteran. Ladies and gentlemen, presenting a video address by Ms. Sean Ramos from Today Explained, here now with Matthew Luxmore. He covers the war in Ukraine for the Wall Street Journal, a war whose end the United States wants to accelerate with Russia the victor.

It all started around a week ago last Wednesday when, firstly, Trump's new defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, announced, quite surprisingly, that NATO membership for Ukraine is off the table. The United States does not believe that NATO membership for Ukraine is a realistic outcome of a negotiated settlement. He later walked back some of those comments, but it's been quite a clear line for the Trump administration ever since. And

And then the same day, Trump announced that he had had a phone call with Russia's president, Vladimir Putin. We had a great call and it lasted for a long time, over an hour. Essentially bringing the Kremlin leader in from the cold after three years of isolation by Biden's administration. And then in a press conference...

batting away criticism from reporters, he said that the only way to fix this is to start with talks directly with Russia. We ultimately expect to meet. In fact, we expect

that he'll come here and I'll go there. And he announced that a meeting would take place in Saudi Arabia between the U.S. side and the Russian side, which of course left the Europeans and the Ukrainians, most importantly, scrambling for a response since they had thought all along that they would be key players in any negotiation over the end of this war.

What sense do we have of what exactly the peace deal might be, the one that the Trump administration is shopping around for? Well, it's very unclear at this stage. Of course, we had this meeting between the U.S. and the Russian side in Saudi Arabia. Trump has all along said that the war must be ended, that, you know, Ukraine is a huge killing field, many lives being lost, which is all correct.

But he's driving towards a peace without really explaining how this peace would be negotiated. The main problem is that Russia's position and Ukraine's position completely don't overlap. Ukraine, until recently, was saying that it's going to regain at least a large part of the land that it lost.

Russia was saying that it's going to keep all the territory that it's taken and it's been calling for a complete disarmament of Ukraine and a kind of neutral version of Ukraine that is not allowed to participate in any international military coalitions and would certainly not be a member of NATO, which is a key aspiration for Ukraine written into its constitution. So Trump, of course, is talking a good game about fixing this war. He's met with the Russian side and

Ukraine says there's going to be no deal that it accepts unless it's involved directly in negotiations. So I think we're very short on the specifics at the moment. All we know at this stage is that talks have begun and presumably Ukraine will be involved in those talks soon when all sides come to the table. But it's very unclear whether the Europeans will be. And that too is contentious. Yes, Trump...

Members of his team have suggested that the Europeans will not be at the table. I said I'm a school of realism. I think that's not going to happen. Even though, of course, it's the continent that sits closest to Ukraine that will be directly impacted by whatever peace deal is made of Ukraine. But they cannot agree on the specifics of what their version of a peace deal would be.

France is not preparing to send ground troops as belligerents in a conflict to the front line. I'm prepared to consider committing British forces on the ground alongside others

if there is a lasting peace agreement. It is completely premature and completely the wrong time to have this discussion now. I'm even a little irritated by these debates, I have to say. This is highly inappropriate, to put it bluntly and honestly. And this is one of the things that Trump's team has expressed very publicly, that Europe is divided and there is no cohesive agreement.

narrative in Europe about how to end this war. A lot of people are upset right now because it seems like the United States is taking a rather sympathetic view towards Russia's side of this war, towards Russia's arguments around this war. Do we have any idea why that is? Well, yeah, of course, here in Europe, in Ukraine as well, people have been quite shocked by the

statements made by Trump on Tuesday suggesting that Ukraine had started the war. But today I heard, oh, well, we weren't invited. Well, you've been there for three years. You should have ended it three years. You should have never started it. You could have made a deal. Which, of course, is not the case. Three years ago, Russia sent, you know, hundreds of thousands of troops over the border into Ukraine and tanks and armored vehicles.

And planes in a full scale invasion of the country. So this is obviously ruffled feathers in Ukraine. And there is very broadly a sense that the Trump administration, if it doesn't outright favor the Russian narrative on things, it seems at least to be sympathetic to it in a way that was obvious.

almost impossible to expect from a U.S. government a year ago when Biden was in power. Right. I mean, I think the new director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, has said that Ukraine and NATO provoked Putin into starting this war. Donald Trump has said similar things. Is the general vibe that the United States is sending to Europe, to Ukraine, to Russia, that

Ukraine bears some responsibility here and thus will have to pay for it. Yeah, I mean, there's the transactional nature of Trump's approach to this conflict, of course. There's also the statements that you referenced that have been made publicly by members of his team, which to anyone in Ukraine sound very much like the statements that Russian officials have made since the war started.

So people are very, very concerned that Russia has swayed the Trump administration. And just on Wednesday, Ukrainian President Zelensky suggested in his most forceful statements about Trump so far that...

whom we respect very much, who supports us constantly, unfortunately lives in this disinformation space. It suggests that there should be more truth coming from the Trump administration. As far as the kind of transactional nature of all this is concerned, the U.S. position is that it has sent billions of dollars in military and financial aid to

to back Ukraine since the war started, as have the Europeans, of course, and that the U.S. side deserves to have something back. And it will give no more, as Trump puts it, aid for nothing to Ukraine. It wants something in exchange. And one of the things it wants in exchange is access to Ukraine.

These so-called rare earths in Ukraine, you know, mineral resources that Ukraine has in abundance, many of which are on Russian occupied territory and very, very difficult to dig out of the ground. But it's one of the ways in which Trump is saying that Ukraine needs to pay the U.S. side back for the help that it's supporting and basically keeping Ukraine as a sovereign state.

It's quite an incredible turnaround from the situation a year ago. Ukraine kind of scuffling with the country that has been instrumental in keeping it, you know, alive, essentially keeping it surviving over the past three years since Russia invaded. You're in Kiev right now.

When you talk to Ukrainians about what's happening here, what's the feeling on the ground? I think it's kind of a mixture between defiance, resignation, caution over what this all means. When you walk the streets of Kyiv today, I think you definitely do sense this kind of tension, this mood of experiencing a calm before the storm. And Zelensky, the president...

He, since the beginning of the war, has been recording each evening a video address to the people. And this week he's suddenly kind of stopped recording these addresses. Now, maybe this is not something that we need to read too much into.

But some people, I think, almost feel like things are more unstable than they used to be and that Zelensky does appear to be flustered and frustrated because I think he's struggling to understand how to respond to this whole situation. And Ukrainians, I think, are just as confused as he is.

Matthew Luxmore, known as today explained as DeluxeMatthewWSJ.com, Avishai Artsy produced, Amina Alsari edited, Laura Bullard fact-checked, Patrick Boyd and Andrea Christen's daughter mixed. The rest of the team includes Harima Wagdi, Amanda Llewellyn, Peter Balanon-Baby, Miles Bryan, Travis Larchuk, Victoria Chamberlain, Devin Schwartz, Jolie Myers, Miranda Kennedy, Noelle King, and welcome, Gabrielle Burbey.

Believe it or not, we use music by Breakmaster Cylinder. Today Explained is distributed by WNYC. The show is a part of Vox. Support our journalism, if you will, by joining our membership program today. Go to vox.com slash members to sign up. And have you heard about the Log Off newsletter? It's a Vox product that tells one story about what happened in Trump world each afternoon. So then you can just log off and forget about him for the rest of the night. Consider it. We'll be logging off in the meantime. Goodbye.