How China’s Rare-Earths Control Defined Tentative Trade Deal With U.S.
13:45 Share

At GMC, ignorance is the furthest thing from bliss. Bliss is research, testing, testing the testing, until it results in not just one truck, but a whole lineup.

The 2025 GMC Sierra lineup featuring the Sierra 1500 heavy duty and EV because true bliss is removing every shadow from every doubt. We are professional grade. Visit GMC.com to learn more.

How China's hold on rare earths dictated the path towards a tentative trade deal with the U.S. I don't think there's a lot of clarity for businesses. What you can say is the auto companies aren't going to have to shut down plants tomorrow, but certainly they're going to have to be watching this issue going forward. Plus, U.S. inflation was muted in May, defying fears that President Trump's tariffs would drive up prices.

And the governor of Texas plans to deploy the National Guard as protests against immigration enforcement spread across the country. It's Wednesday, June 11th. I'm Alex Zosala for The Wall Street Journal. This is the p.m. edition of What's News, the top headlines and business stories that move the world today.

President Trump said today that the U.S. and China had agreed on terms for a truce on trade. As we reported this morning, the framework for the deal, which the U.S. and China negotiated over two days in London this week, hinged on access to China's exports of rare earth magnets, coin-sized components that are indispensable for powering car motors, industrial robots, and missile guidance systems.

An administration official confirmed that tariffs will stay at levels agreed to in the deal signed in Geneva last month. Gavin Bade covers economic policy for the journal and is here to tell us more. Gavin, earlier this year, China decided to cut back on exports of rare earth magnets for a few months. What role did that play in bringing the U.S. and China back to the bargaining table?

It was really the driving force behind these very hastily arranged negotiations in London this week. We heard not only defense contractors and military applications, companies complaining about this, but also large U.S. automakers were in the White House's ear saying, if we don't solve this export license problem with the rare earth magnets, we may need to shut down production on a large scale, like pandemic style disruptions to their operations.

What does this new deal include and how is this different from the one that was signed last month in Geneva? Basically, this is a non-tariff deal. All of the tariff stuff has stayed the same since Geneva. And basically, this deal brings us back to square one, where we were in May.

And I expect that means that the sides will need to continue talking just to make sure that either side is not going to see higher tariffs at the end of this 90-day period, which we think is still operable, although the administration has not cleared that up for us yet. And then there's always the opportunity for someone to ratchet up these export controls again. And so this is just the next chapter in this cycle that we see of escalation, de-escalation, and we will only see that more going forward.

What is China getting in return here? As we heard from people familiar with the matter, it limited the easing of rare earth export licenses for U.S. manufacturers to six months. Why is that?

What they're getting in return is the relaxation of some of the recent export controls, not the ones on leading edge chips, not the things or the software needed to make those chips. So not the things that China has been complaining about for a long time, but these new recent and not publicly announced export controls over things like jet engines. We had gone and taken a scalpel and really looked at places where they had a vulnerability similar to they were doing with the rare earth licenses.

And so it's not unreasonable to expect that the Chinese government would not just agree to something indefinitely with the Trump administration. They would say, OK, we'll do these licenses for six months and then we'll maybe check back in and make sure everything is still going well. So what we just see is another momentary detente.

I don't think there's a lot of clarity for businesses as well. What you can say is the auto companies aren't going to have to shut down plants tomorrow, but certainly they're going to have to be watching this issue going forward. That was WSJ reporter Gavin Bade. Thank you, Gavin. Thanks, Alex. Always a pleasure.

The Labor Department said today that consumer prices were up 2.4 percent in May from a year earlier. That's hotter than April's gain of 2.3 percent, but in line with economists' expectations. The so-called core measure economists watch in an effort to better capture inflation's underlying trend, prices excluding food and energy categories, rose 2.8 percent below forecasts. For more, I'm joined by WSJ investing columnist Spencer Jacob. Spencer, what does the

What does this inflation data mean for the Fed, especially given the latest jobs report out Friday that showed that hiring slowed last month? So there's a Fed meeting next week where basically no one expects them to do anything. And also because a lot of the other economic data has been good so far. More than inflation, what we need to watch are

signs of softness in the economy. You've had a lot of surveys that have pointed to trepidation in terms of companies investing, pessimism by consumers. But that's just what people say, what people do and how many people are hired. That's what the Fed really cares about.

President Trump has already been pressuring the Fed to lower interest rates. This morning, in fact, he posted on social media about the Consumer Price Index and urged the Fed to lower interest rates by a full point. How does that factor into the Fed's decision? Well, political pressure at the moment doesn't factor into their decision at all. The

The Fed needs to show that it is independent. It can't be seen taking orders from politicians, whether it's Congress or the White House at all. There's another thing at play here, too, which is not what the Fed does in the next several months because Trump is pressuring them, but also what people think the Fed will do when he appoints the next president.

Fed chair, because that person will have influence over rates. And since he's so explicitly urging them to do that, if there's some speculation about who that person might be and whether they might be more willing to be looser with monetary policy, that will affect market expectations in and of itself. That was WSJ Investing columnist Spencer Jacob. Thank you, Spencer. Thank you.

Bond investors liked that latest read on inflation. In recent trading, U.S. government bonds staged a big rally, dragging the yield on 10-year Treasury notes down to about 4.42%. Major U.S. indexes fell slightly today. The S&P 500 dropped about 0.3%, the Nasdaq dipped 0.5%, and the Dow stayed flat.

Gold has emerged as the real rival to the dollar's reserve status. It has surpassed the euro as the second largest global reserve asset at market prices last year. A report out today from the European Central Bank highlighted the shifts underway in the portfolios of global central banks. At the end of 2024, gold bullion made up around 20% of global official reserves, overtaking the euro's 16%.

The increased share was driven by a combination of central bank stockpiling and record high gold prices. Coming up, protests against immigration enforcement have spread. How Home Depot found itself in the middle of the debate. That's after the break.

This message is brought to you by Abercrombie & Fitch. I've been ready for summer for a while, and now it's finally time for summer outfits. With the trip coming up, the A&F Vacation Shop has me covered. Abercrombie really knows how to do a lightweight outfit. Their tees, sweater polos, and linen blend shorts never miss. I wear Abercrombie denim year-round. Their shorts are no different and have the comfort I need for summer.

Prep for your next trip with the A&F Vacation Shop. Get their newest arrivals in-store, online, and in the app. Texas Governor Greg Abbott said he would deploy the National Guard across parts of the state as anti-ice protests that have gripped Los Angeles since Friday spread across the country.

The move came ahead of a planned protest in San Antonio expected today, two days after protesters in Austin were met with tear gas and pepper spray projectiles near the state capitol. Local organizers in several other cities, including New York, Las Vegas, Seattle, and Minneapolis, said they were planning protests for today. Already, hundreds of protesters have been arrested in demonstrations across the country. Meanwhile, one company that has found itself in the middle of the debate around the immigration crackdown is Home Depot.

Immigration agents conducted a sweep Friday at a strip mall that includes a Home Depot in the predominantly Latino neighborhood of Westlake in Los Angeles, setting off days of protests around Los Angeles County. For more, I'm joined by Sarah Nassauer, who covers large retailers for The Journal.

How did the company find itself at the center of all of this? Let's start by digging into this relationship between Home Depot and the day laborers who often show up outside its stores for work. This sort of symbiotic but somewhat contentious relationship has existed for decades between day laborers and Home Depot and in other informal places across the country. But the Trump administration and specifically Stephen Miller, The Wall Street Journal has reported last month

wanted to step up its enforcement actions. And one of the suggestions he had in a meeting with ICE officials was just go to Home Depot, just go to 7-Eleven. We need to branch out from targeting criminals. We need to round up more people, basically. What is the company saying about this? A spokeswoman said yesterday that they're not involved. They don't know when an immigration enforcement action is coming to the area of their store. They aren't coordinating anything.

but that they are issuing some guidance to stores, for example, in the Los Angeles area where a lot of this activity has been focused so far, that those store workers and managers should report when this happens to corporate. They want to track what's going on as well as not get involved for their own safety. And they said they have a policy that if a worker doesn't feel comfortable sticking around for the day, they can leave and still be paid. What does all of this mean for Home Depot's business?

That part's a little unclear, and it to me is really fascinating. It has been decades that Home Depot is a known spot for day laborers to hang out and look for daily work. The company does not explicitly endorse it. They have a no solicitation policy, they say. This has been contentious, though. Some people have criticized Home Depot over the years for potentially enabling illegal immigration. Other people have criticized Home Depot over the years for

not treating those workers well. And so they've been criticized from all sides. And it's unclear how this will affect their business, but it's clearly something that is a piece of how people that come to Home Depot, at least in some cities, see like the benefit. Like I might be able to get a worker who can come and help on this job I'm working on today. That was WSJ reporter Sarah Nassauer. Thank you, Sarah. Thanks for having me.

In other news, Elon Musk has de-escalated his war of words with President Trump. Writing on X this morning, he said that he regretted some of his posts about the president last week and said, quote, they went too far. We're exclusively reporting that, according to people familiar with the matter, Vice President J.D. Vance and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles urged Musk to put an end to the feud in a call last Friday.

Harvey Weinstein has been found guilty of one count of sexual assault and acquitted on another in his sex crimes retrial in New York. The mixed verdict comes after two trials and dozens of allegations against the former Hollywood producer. The jury couldn't reach consensus on a rape charge, and deliberations will resume tomorrow. Weinstein was tried and convicted on similar sex crimes in 2020, but New York's highest court overturned that conviction last year.

And a lawsuit filed in federal court in Tennessee today seeks to end a program designed to funnel tens of millions of dollars to colleges and universities with a large percentage of Hispanic students, charging it is racist and unconstitutional. The suit was filed by the state of Tennessee, an advocacy group Students for Fair Admissions, against the U.S. Department of Education. The president of SFFA, Edward Bloom, spearheaded the Harvard case.

The Education Department didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. And that's what's news for this Wednesday afternoon. Today's show is produced by Anthony Bansi and Pierre Bien-Aimé, with supervising producer Michael Cosmedes. I'm Alex Oseleff for The Wall Street Journal. We'll be back with a new show tomorrow morning. Thanks for listening. ♪