AI-Powered iMessage Assistant: The Future of Smart Conversations
05:19 Share

Hello, everyone. Welcome back to another episode of the AI podcast, Decoding Tomorrow's Intelligence. I'm your host, Eli Schaefer, and we have a really interesting topic today. So who hasn't seen a text just sitting there and felt like, oh, no, I should have replied to that? Like life just gets in the way sometimes and we turn into the ghost we never wanted to be. Such a common thing as even a term for now, text dead.

But what if there was an app to like help us with this whole thing? Well, that's what we're looking at today. This new AI app called RPLY that wants to like totally change how we deal with our inboxes. So RPLY is getting a lot of attention and for good reason. It's not your average messaging app. It's made just for iMessage. And it's all the help when you get to that magical place. Inbox zero for all those texts you'd be meaning to reply to. The person behind this is Molly Cantaloupe. She's like 21, drop down Stanford. And hold on, because this isn't even her first AI project.

She also made AnnoX, this AI assistant that OpenAI Startup Fund is already backing. So how does RPLY actually do all this? Imagine it's like your super organized texting assistant. It scans your iMessage looking for those messages that have been sitting there for like 24 hours or more. And it uses AI to suggest replies so you don't end up ghosting people. But here's the really interesting part.

RPLY doesn't just give you generic replies like, "Hey, how you doing?" It goes way deeper than that. It actually looks at all your past texts to figure out how you communicate, how you phrase things, your sense of humor, even your punctuation. Think about that for a second.

It's making replies that sound just like you, mimicking your tone and how you talk to different people. It's almost like having a digital twin who knows how you text better than you do. And it even has this thing called the unanswered message filter. Like it takes all your unread texts and puts them in like a to-do list for your inbox so you can see right away who you still need to reply to. It's kind of like prioritizing your conversations right.

But you're probably thinking, "Wade, that's like super basic." But here's the thing. Apple doesn't even have that for iMessage. It makes you wonder why something so simple isn't already there. But there's even more.

RPLY also gives you all this cool info about how you text. You can see how long it takes you to reply on average. You can track how long you can keep your inbox at zero with an inbox zero street. And even see who you're fastest to answer and who might be waiting a little longer. It's like it analyzes your whole texting style. So the big question is, does it actually work?

Well, people over at TechCrunch got to try it out and they said it's pretty good. They said the replies sounded natural and some people even thought they were talking to a real person. Of course, AI isn't perfect yet and there were a few things they gave away, like sometimes they would put a comma after "haha" but all of court, that showed it wasn't human. They also noticed it didn't use emojis, which they thought would make it feel more personal.

Now you might be wondering who's using this thing. Well, RPOI already has like a thousand paid users, mostly in tech creative fields and business. Like founders who are juggling a ton of things, recruiters going through a million messages, or retail people dealing with customer questions, and basically anyone whose inbox is out of control. And let's be real, students would probably love this too. No more freaking out late at night because you forgot to reply to your professor.

But here's where things get a little deeper, because rvly brings up some big questions about how we communicate. Like as AI gets better, are we going to let technology take over our personal conversations? Is it making us less connected to each other? Is having a clean inbox worth losing that real human connection? Think about it if we're letting AI write our texts for us. Are we really expressing ourselves or are we just sending automatic replies?

It's a tough question, and there's no easy answer. But it's something to consider as AI becomes a bigger part of our lives. And of course, we can't talk about AI without talking about privacy. To use RPLY, you have to give it access to all your iMessages and your contacts. That's a lot of personal info, and for some people, that might be too much. Now, RPLY said they don't use this data to train other AI models and that they'd lean it all after its process. They call it a zero data retention policy.

and they say they don't sell your data either. But even with the best intentions, sometimes data breaches happen. Remember that deep seek thing where all their user data got out? Chad history is everything. It just shows that nothing is totally foolproof.

So it makes you think, are these risks just the price we pay for convenience? Can we maybe do things differently, like process the data only on your device? It's a complicated issue for sure. And RPOY doesn't want to stop with just iMessageAider. Molly Cantellan wants to expand to WhatsApp and Slack too. Especially Slack that brings up some interesting questions like, would people at work be okay with an AI reading their conversations? It gets kind of blurry when you think about AI in the workplace. So where does all this leave us?

RPoY is definitely a cool solution to the problem of having too many texts, but it also makes us think about some ethical stuff in privacy. Is it a tool that frees us from our inbots? Or is it taking away from real human connection? Are we really okay with giving up some privacy for convenience? I guess the future of communication is changing really fast, and we have to decide what part AI is going to play. If AI can write our texts, what does that mean for how we talk to each other online?

Something to think about, right? Next time you see that little cursor blinking and you're feeling overwhelmed by all your messages, maybe take a second to think who's really behind your reply. Is it you or is it the algorithm?